The biology of incretin hormones

Gut peptides, exemplified by glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) are secreted in a nutrient-dependent manner and stimulate glucose-dependent insulin secretion. Both GIP and GLP-1 also promote β cell proliferation and inhibit apoptosis, leading to expansion of β cell mass. GLP-1, but not GIP, controls glycemia via additional actions on glucose sensors, inhibition of gastric emptying, food intake and glucagon secretion. Furthermore, GLP-1, unlike GIP, potently stimulates insulin secretion and reduces blood glucose in human subjects with type 2 diabetes. This article summarizes current concepts of incretin action and highlights the potential therapeutic utility of GLP-1 receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.     

GIP and GLP-1 as incretin hormones: lessons from single and double incretin receptor knockout mice

Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) are gut-derived incretins secreted in response to nutrient ingestion. Both incretins potentiate glucose-dependent insulin secretion and enhance beta-cell mass through regulation of beta-cell proliferation, neogenesis and apoptosis. In contrast, GLP-1, but not GIP, inhibits gastric emptying, glucagon secretion, and food intake. Furthermore, human subjects with Type 2 diabetes exhibit relative resistance to the actions of GIP, but not GLP-1R agonists. The physiological importance of both incretins has been investigated through generation and analysis of incretin receptor knockout mice. Elimination of incretin receptor action in GIPR-/- or GLP-1R-/- mice produces only modest impairment in glucose homeostasis. Similarly, double incretin receptor knockout (DIRKO) mice exhibit normal body weight and normal levels of plasma glucagon and hypoglycemic responses to exogenous insulin. However, glucose-stimulated insulin secretion is significantly decreased following oral but not intraperitoneal glucose challenge in DIRKO mice and the glucose lowering actions of dipeptidyl peptidase-IV (DPP-IV) inhibitors are extinguished in DIRKO mice. Hence, incretin receptor signaling exerts physiologically relevant actions critical for glucose homeostasis, and represents a pharmacologically attractive target for development of agents for the treatment of Type 2 diabetes.     

Secretion of incretin hormones (GIP and GLP-1) and incretin effect after oral glucose in first-degree relatives of patients with type 2 diabetes

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Since insulin secretion in response to exogenous gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) is diminished not only in patients with type 2 diabetes, but also in their normal glucose-tolerant first-degree relatives, it was the aim to investigate the integrity of the entero-insular axis in such subjects. METHODS: Sixteen first-degree relatives of patients with type 2 diabetes (4 male, 12 female, age 50+/-12 years, BMI 26.1+/-3.8 kg/m(2)) and 10 matched healthy controls (negative family history, 6 male, 4 female, 45+/-13 years, 26.1+/-4.2 kg/m(2)) were examined with an oral glucose load (75 g) and an "isoglycaemic" intravenous glucose infusion. Blood was drawn over 240 min for plasma glucose (glucose oxidase), insulin, C-peptide, GIP and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1; specific immunoassays). RESULTS: The pattern of glucose concentrations could precisely be copied by the intravenous glucose infusion (p=0.99). Insulin secretion was stimulated significantly more by oral as compared to intravenous glucose in both groups (p<0.0001). The percent contribution of the incretin effect was similar in both groups (C-peptide: 61.9+/-5.4 vs. 64.4+/-5.8%; p=0.77; insulin: 74.2+/-3.3 vs. 75.8+/-4.9; p=0.97; in first-degree relatives and controls, respectively). The individual responses of GIP and GLP-1 secretion were significantly correlated with each other (p=0.0003). The individual secretion of both GIP and GLP-1 was identified as a strong predictor of the integrated incremental insulin secretory responses as well as of the incretin effect. CONCLUSION/INTERPRETATION: Despite a lower insulin secretory response to exogenous GIP, incretin effects are similar in first-degree relatives of patients with type 2 diabetes and control subjects. This may be the result of a B cell secretory defect that affects stimulation by oral and intravenous glucose to a similar degree. Nevertheless, endogenous secretion of GIP and GLP-1 is a major determinant of insulin secretion after oral glucose.     

Role of incretin hormones in the regulation of insulin secretion in diabetic and nondiabetic humans

The available evidence suggests that about two-thirds of the insulin response to an oral glucose load is due to the potentiating effect of gut-derived incretin hormones. The strongest candidates for the incretin effect are glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1). In patients with type 2 diabetes, however, the incretin effect is lost or greatly impaired. It is hypothesized that this loss explains an important part of the impaired insulin secretion in patients. Further analysis of the incretin effects in patients has revealed that the secretion of GIP is near normal, whereas the secretion of GLP-1 is decreased. On the other hand, the insulintropic effect of GLP-1 is preserved, whereas the effect of GIP is greatly reduced, mainly because of a complete loss of the normal GIP-induced potentiation of second-phase insulin secretion. These two features, therefore, explain the incretin defect of type 2 diabetes. Strong support for the hypothesis that the defect plays an important role in the insulin deficiency of patients is provided by the finding that administration of excess GLP-1 to patients may completely restore the glucose-induced insulin secretion as well as the beta-cells' sensitivity to glucose. Because of this, analogs of GLP-1 or GLP-1 receptor activations are currently being developed for diabetes treatment, so far with very promising results.     

Impact of incretin hormones on beta-cell function in subjects with normal or impaired glucose tolerance

The mechanisms by which the enteroinsular axis influences beta-cell function have not been investigated in detail. We performed oral and isoglycemic intravenous (IV) glucose administration in subjects with normal (NGT; n = 11) or impaired glucose tolerance (IGT; n = 10), using C-peptide deconvolution to calculate insulin secretion rates and mathematical modeling to quantitate beta-cell function. The incretin effect was taken to be the ratio of oral to IV responses. In NGT, incretin-mediated insulin release [oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)/IV ratio = 1.59 +/- 0.18, P = 0.004] amounted to 18 +/- 2 nmol/m(2) (32 +/- 4% of oral response), and its time course matched that of total insulin secretion. The beta-cell glucose sensitivity (OGTT/IV ratio = 1.52 +/- 0.26, P = 0.02), rate sensitivity (response to glucose rate of change, OGTT/IV ratio = 2.22 +/- 0.37, P = 0.06), and glucose-independent potentiation were markedly higher with oral than IV glucose. In IGT, beta-cell glucose sensitivity (75 +/- 14 vs. 156 +/- 28 pmol.min(-1).m(-2).mM(-1) of NGT, P = 0.01) and potentiation were impaired on the OGTT. The incretin effect was not significantly different from NGT in terms of plasma glucagon-like peptide 1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide responses, total insulin secretion, and enhancement of beta-cell glucose sensitivity (OGTT/IV ratio = 1.73 +/- 0.24, P = NS vs. NGT). However, the time courses of incretin-mediated insulin secretion and potentiation were altered, with a predominance of glucose-induced vs. incretin-mediated stimulation. We conclude that, under physiological circumstances, incretin-mediated stimulation of insulin secretion results from an enhancement of all dynamic aspects of beta-cell function, particularly beta-cell glucose sensitivity. In IGT, beta-cell function is inherently impaired, whereas the incretin effect is only partially affected.     

Lack of effect of incretin hormones on insulin release from pancreatic islets in the bile duct-ligated rats

Hyperglycemia associated with obstructive jaundice seriously affects the prognosis of patients with hepatobiliary diseases. We investigated secretory properties of isolated islets from bile duct-ligated (BDL) rats. Pancreatic islets from BDL rats lost their secretory responses to glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), although their responses to glucose were normal. Loss of potentiation of insulin release was also observed in glucagon and glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP), whereas modulation of the release by forskolin, dibutyryl cAMP, or epinephrine remained unaffected. cAMP production by BDL islets was not increased by these insulinotropic hormones. Serum levels of glucagon, but not GIP, were increased in BDL rats. GLP-1 levels were also elevated, although they did not reach statistical significance. Immunoblotting of trimeric G protein subunits demonstrated that G(s)alpha L and G(s)alpha S, but not G(i)alpha 1/2 and G(i)alpha 3/o alpha, were less expressed in BDL islets. Therefore, unresponsiveness of the beta-cell to cAMP-raising hormones is involved in glucose intolerance under cholestasis. It results from diminished expression of alpha-subunits of the relevant G protein, G(s), and desensitization of receptors of these hormones.     

Simultaneous determination of incretin hormones and their truncated forms from human plasma by immunoprecipitation and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry

The incretins, glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP(1-42)) and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1(7-36)), are involved in regulation of gastric emptying, glucose homeostasis, body fat regulation and the glucose-induced insulin secretion from the endocrine pancreas. After release in the circulation both peptides are rapidly degraded by the exopeptidase dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DP IV) to the inactive polypeptides GIP(3-42) and GLP-1(9-36). In vivo stabilization of the active incretins by orally available DP IV-inhibitors is now widely accepted as a new therapeutic approach in antidiabetic treatment. In order to demonstrate the pharmacodynamic effect of DP IV-inhibitors, it is necessary to measure the plasma levels of active and inactive forms of GIP and GLP-1. We previously described an immunoprecipitation method as sample preparation and concentration in combination with a LC-MS analysis for determination of active and inactive GIP. We could improve the efficiency and suitability of this method by reduction of the necessary sample volume to 1.0 ml and simultaneous measurement of GIP(1-42), GIP(3-42) and GLP-1(7-36), GLP-1(9-36), without loss of sensitivity. An LOQ of approximately 5 and 11 pmol/l was maintained for GIP and GLP-1, respectively.     

Overview of osteoporosis.

Osteoporosis is a common age-related disorder manifested clinically by skeletal fractures, especially fractures of the vertebrae, hip, and distal forearm. The major cause of these fractures is low bone mass, although an increase in trauma due to falls in the elderly also contributes. There are multiple causes for the low bone mass which, in any given individual, may contribute differently to the development of the osteopenia. The most important groups of causes are failure to achieve adequate peak bone mass, slow bone loss due to processes relating to aging, the menopause in women, and a variety of sporadic behavioral, nutritional, and environmental factors that affect bone mass in some but not in other individuals. The most important approach is prevention. Drugs and behavioral factors known to cause bone loss should be eliminated and perimenopausal women should be evaluated for possible preventive administration of estrogen. For patients with fractures due to established osteoporosis, the only drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration are the antiresorptive agents calcium, estrogen, and calcitonin. Formation-stimulating regimens, however, are being developed and may be available for clinical use in the foreseeable future. These regimens may be capable of increasing bone mass to above the fracture threshold, thereby resulting in a clinical cure of the osteoporosis.     

Discovery of dual-action membrane-anchored modulators of incretin receptors

Background

The glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptors are considered complementary therapeutic targets for type 2 diabetes. Using recombinant membrane-tethered ligand (MTL) technology, the present study focused on defining optimized modulators of these receptors, as well as exploring how local anchoring influences soluble peptide function.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Serial substitution of residue 7 in membrane-tethered GIP (tGIP) led to a wide range of activities at the GIP receptor, with [G⁷]tGIP showing enhanced efficacy compared to the wild type construct. In contrast, introduction of G⁷ into the related ligands, tGLP-1 and tethered exendin-4 (tEXE4), did not affect signaling at the cognate GLP-1 receptor. Both soluble and tethered GIP and GLP-1 were selective activators of their respective receptors. Although soluble EXE4 is highly selective for the GLP-1 receptor, unexpectedly, tethered EXE4 was found to be a potent activator of both the GLP-1 and GIP receptors. Diverging from the pharmacological properties of soluble and tethered GIP, the newly identified GIP-R agonists, (i.e. [G⁷]tGIP and tEXE4) failed to trigger cognate receptor endocytosis. In an attempt to recapitulate the dual agonism observed with tEXE4, we conjugated soluble EXE4 to a lipid moiety. Not only did this soluble peptide activate both the GLP-1 and GIP receptors but, when added to receptor expressing cells, the activity persists despite serial washes.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that conversion of a recombinant MTL to a soluble membrane anchored equivalent offers a means to prolong ligand function, as well as to design agonists that can simultaneously act on more than one therapeutic target.