On the differences between maximum likelihood and regression interval mapping in the analysis of quantitative trait loci

The differences between maximum-likelihood (ML) and regression (REG) interval mapping in the analysis of quantitative trait loci (QTL) are investigated analytically and numerically by simulation. The analytical investigation is based on the comparison of the solution sets of the ML and REG methods in the estimation of QTL parameters. Their differences are found to relate to the similarity between the conditional posterior and conditional probabilities of QTL genotypes and depend on several factors, such as the proportion of variance explained by QTL, relative QTL position in an interval, interval size, difference between the sizes of QTL, epistasis, and linkage between QTL. The differences in mean squared error (MSE) of the estimates, likelihood-ratio test (LRT) statistics in testing parameters, and power of QTL detection between the two methods become larger as (1) the proportion of variance explained by QTL becomes higher, (2) the QTL locations are positioned toward the middle of intervals, (3) the QTL are located in wider marker intervals, (4) epistasis between QTL is stronger, (5) the difference between QTL effects becomes larger, and (6) the positions of QTL get closer in QTL mapping. The REG method is biased in the estimation of the proportion of variance explained by QTL, and it may have a serious problem in detecting closely linked QTL when compared to the ML method. In general, the differences between the two methods may be minor, but can be significant when QTL interact or are closely linked. The ML method tends to be more powerful and to give estimates with smaller MSEs and larger LRT statistics. This implies that ML interval mapping can be more accurate, precise, and powerful than REG interval mapping. The REG method is faster in computation, especially when the number of QTL considered in the model is large. Recognizing the factors affecting the differences between REG and ML interval mapping can help an efficient strategy, using both methods in QTL mapping to be outlined.     

A comparison of interval mapping procedures including the QTL-cluster mapping

Using the deterministic sampling, patterns of the log-likelihood surfaces expected in some interval mapping procedures for estimating the position of, and the effect for, QTL(s) were investigated for the situations where a single QTL or closely linked QTLs are contained in a chromosome segment bracketed with two markers. The mapping procedures compared were the conventional, likelihood-based interval mapping (IM), the regression interval mapping (RIM), and the QTL-cluster mapping (CM) in which the conditional probabilities of transmission of the whole segment marked by the flanking markers were taken into consideration. The half-sib design was used here, and several cases of the true genetic model were considered, differing in the number of QTLs contained in the marker interval, the linkage phase for the sire, and the magnitude of the QTL(s) effect. For the true genetic models where a single QTL or closely linked QTLs being in coupling phase are contained in the interval, with (R)IM, clear global maxima of the log-likelihood were observed within the range of the marker interval. It was shown that the estimates of the QTL(s) effect at the marked segment level are expected to be unbiased. On the other hand, in a setting where the linkage phase for the linked QTLs located in the interval was different from coupling and repulsion, there was found a ridge along the interval for the log-likelihood surface with (R)IM, indicating the dependency between the estimates of the position of, and the effect for, the putative QTL. For this case, it was found that the position of the putative QTL could be estimated as that of one of the flanking markers, and the estimate of the QTL effect be biased. In contrast, it was revealed that CM is expected to provide the unbiased estimate of the QTL(s)-effect at the segment level for any case of the true genetic models considered here. If the aim is for marker-assisted selection rather than mapping closely linked QTLs individually, then the CM approach is considered to be useful.     

A method for computing identity by descent probabilities and quantitative trait loci mapping with dominant (AFLP) markers

Amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLPs) are a widely used marker system: the technique is very cost-effective, easy and rapid, and reproducibly generates hundreds of markers. Unfortunately, AFLP alleles are typically scored as the presence or absence of a band and, thus, heterozygous and dominant homozygous genotypes cannot be distinguished. This results in a significant loss of information, especially as regards mapping of quantitative trait loci (QTLs). We present a Monte Carlo Markov Chain method that allows us to compute the identity by descent probabilities (IBD) in a general pedigree whose individuals have been typed for dominant markers. The method allows us to include the information provided by the fluorescent band intensities of the markers, the rationale being that homozygous individuals have on average higher band intensities than heterozygous individuals, as well as information from linked markers in each individual and its relatives. Once IBD probabilities are obtained, they can be combined into the QTL mapping strategy of choice. We illustrate the method with two simulated populations: an outbred population consisting of full sib families, and an F2 cross between inbred lines. Two marker spacings were considered, 5 or 20 cM, in the outbred population. There was almost no difference, for the practical purpose of QTL estimation, between AFLPs and biallelic codominant markers when the band density is taken into account, especially at the 5 cM spacing. The performance of AFLPs every 5 cM was also comparable to that of highly polymorphic markers (microsatellites) spaced every 20 cM. In economic terms, QTL mapping with a dense map of AFLPs is clearly better than microsatellite QTL mapping and little is lost in terms of accuracy of position. Nevertheless, at low marker densities, AFLPs or other biallelic markers result in very inaccurate estimates of QTL position.     

A comparison of regression interval mapping and multiple interval mapping for linked QTL

Regression interval mapping and multiple interval mapping are compared with regard to mapping linked quantitative trait loci (QTL) in inbred-line cross experiments. For that purpose, a simulation study was performed using genetic models with two linked QTL. Data were simulated for F(2) populations of different sizes and with all QTL and marker alleles fixed for alternative alleles in the parental lines. The criteria for comparison are power of QTL identification and the accuracy of the QTL position and effect estimates. Further, the estimates of the relative QTL variance are assessed. There are distinct differences in the QTL position estimates between the two methods. Multiple interval mapping tends to be more powerful as compared to regression interval mapping. Multiple interval mapping further leads to more accurate QTL position and QTL effect estimates. The superiority increased with wider marker intervals and larger population sizes. If QTL are in repulsion, the differences between the two methods are very pronounced. For both methods, the reduction of the marker interval size from 10 to 5 cM increases power and greatly improves QTL parameter estimates. This contrasts with findings in the literature for single QTL scenarios, where a marker density of 10 cM is generally considered as sufficient. The use of standard (asymptotic) statistical theory for the computation of the standard errors of the QTL position and effect estimates proves to give much too optimistic standard errors for regression interval mapping as well as for multiple interval mapping.     

The genetic variance for multiple linked quantitative trait loci conditional on marker information in a crossed population

In the prediction of genetic values and quantitative trait loci (QTLs) mapping via the mixed model method incorporating marker information in animal populations, it is important to model the genetic variance for individuals with an arbitrary pedigree structure. In this study, for a crossed population originated from different genetic groups such as breeds or outbred strains, the variance of additive genetic values for multiple linked QTLs that are contained in a chromosome segment, especially the segregation variance, is investigated assuming the use of marker data. The variance for a finite number of QTLs in one chromosomal segment is first examined for the crossed population with the general pedigree. Then, applying the concept of the expectation of identity-by-descent proportion, an approximation to the mean of the conditional probabilities for the linked QTLs over all loci is obtained, and using it an expression for the variance in the case of an infinite number of linked QTLs marked by flanking markers is derived. It appears that the approach presented can be useful in the segment mapping using, and in the genetic evaluation of, crosses with general pedigrees in the population of concern. The calculation of the segregation variance through the current approach is illustrated numerically, using a small data-set.     

Detection and parameter estimation for quantitative trait loci using regression models and multiple markers

A strategy of multi-step minimal conditional regression analysis has been developed to determine the existence of statistical testing and parameter estimation for a quantitative trait locus (QTL) that are unaffected by linked QTLs. The estimation of marker-QTL recombination frequency needs to consider only three cases: 1) the chromosome has only one QTL, 2) one side of the target QTL has one or more QTLs, and 3) either side of the target QTL has one or more QTLs. Analytical formula was derived to estimate marker-QTL recombination frequency for each of the three cases. The formula involves two flanking markers for case 1), two flanking markers plus a conditional marker for case 2), and two flanking markers plus two conditional markers for case 3). Each QTL variance and effect, and the total QTL variance were also estimated using analytical formulae. Simulation data show that the formulae for estimating marker-QTL recombination frequency could be a useful statistical tool for fine QTL mapping. With 1 000 observations, a QTL could be mapped to a narrow chromosome region of 1.5 cM if no linked QTL is present, and to a 2.8 cM chromosome region if either side of the target QTL has at least one linked QTL.     

The effects of selective genotyping on estimates of proportion of recombination between linked quantitative trait loci

Selective genotyping is the marker assay of only the more extreme phenotypes for a quantitative trait and is intended to increase the efficiency of quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping. We show that selective genotyping can bias estimates of the recombination frequency between linked QTLs — upwardly when QTLs are in repulsion phase, and downwardly when QTLs are in coupling phase. We examined these biases under simple models involving two QTLs segregating in a backcross or F₂ population, using both analytical models and computer simulations. We found that bias is a function of the proportion selected, the magnitude of QTL effects, distance between QTLs and the dominance of QTLs. Selective genotyping thus may decrease the power of mapping multiple linked QTLs and bias the construction of a marker map. We suggest a large proportion than previously suggested (50%) or the entire population be genotyped if linked QTLs of large effects (explain > 10% phenotypic variance) are evident. New models need to be developed to explicitly incorporate selection into QTL map construction.     

On the mapping of quantitative trait loci at marker and non-marker locations

Previous studies have noted that the estimated positions of a large proportion of mapped quantitative trait loci (QTLs) coincide with marker locations and have suggested that this indicates a bias in the mapping methodology. In this study we predict the expected proportion of QTLs with positions estimated to be at the location of a marker and further examine the problem using simulated data. The results show that the higher proportion of putative QTLs estimated to be at marker positions compared with non-marker positions is an expected consequence of the estimation methods. The study initially focused on a single interval with no QTLs and was extended to include multiple intervals and QTLs of large effect. Further, the study demonstrated that the larger proportion of estimated QTL positions at the location of markers was not unique to linear regression mapping. Maximum likelihood produced similar results, although the accumulation of positional estimates at outermost markers was reduced when regions outside the linkage group were also considered. The bias towards marker positions is greatest under the null hypothesis of no QTLs or when QTL effects are small. This study discusses the impact the findings could have on the calculation of thresholds and confidence intervals produced by bootstrap methods.     

标记基因型中QTL基因型条件概率分布

随着分子数量遗传学的发展,人们提出了很多统计模型用于QTL定位分析。在这些模型中,首先得确定QTL在标记基因型中的条件概率分布,然后利用适当的统计方法对QTL在基因组中所处的位置进行估计。本文讨论了常见作图群体（如F2和回交群体）中在给定标记基因型下QTL的条件概率分布,提出了用Mathematics软件推导QTL基因型条件概率分布的方法。用该方法能够快速地、准确地推导出比较复杂的标记基因型中QTL基因型的条件概率分布。     

Multi-QTL mapping for quantitative traits using distorted markers

Marker segregation distortion is a common natural phenomenon. However, relatively little is known about utilizing distorted markers for detecting quantitative trait loci (QTL). Therefore, in this study we proposed a multi-QTL mapping approach that uses distorted markers. First, the information from all markers, including distorted markers, was used to detect segregation distortion loci (SDL). Second, the information from the detected SDL was used to correct the conditional probabilities of the QTL genotypes conditional on marker information, and these corrected probabilities were then incorporated into a multi-QTL mapping methodology. Finally, the proposed approach was validated by both Monte Carlo simulation studies and real data analysis. The results from the simulation studies show that as long as one or two SDL are placed around the simulated QTL, there are no differences between the new method and the ordinary interval mapping method in terms of the power of QTL detection or the estimates of the position and dominant effects of the QTL. However, the power of QTL detection is higher under the dominant genetic model of SDL than under the additive genetic model, and the estimate for the additive effect of QTL using the new method is significantly different from the estimate obtained using ordinary interval mapping. The above results were further confirmed by the detection of QTL for dried soymilk in 222 F_2:4 families in soybean.     

Empirical Bayesian elastic net for multiple quantitative trait locus mapping

In multiple quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping, a high-dimensional sparse regression model is usually employed to account for possible multiple linked QTLs. The QTL model may include closely linked and thus highly correlated genetic markers, especially when high-density marker maps are used in QTL mapping because of the advancement in sequencing technology. Although existing algorithms, such as Lasso, empirical Bayesian Lasso (EBlasso) and elastic net (EN) are available to infer such QTL models, more powerful methods are highly desirable to detect more QTLs in the presence of correlated QTLs. We developed a novel empirical Bayesian EN (EBEN) algorithm for multiple QTL mapping that inherits the efficiency of our previously developed EBlasso algorithm. Simulation results demonstrated that EBEN provided higher power of detection and almost the same false discovery rate compared with EN and EBlasso. Particularly, EBEN can identify correlated QTLs that the other two algorithms may fail to identify. When analyzing a real dataset, EBEN detected more effects than EN and EBlasso. EBEN provides a useful tool for inferring high-dimensional sparse model in multiple QTL mapping and other applications. An R software package ‘EBEN'' implementing the EBEN algorithm is available on the Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN).     

The covariance between relatives conditional on genetic markers

The development of molecular genotyping techniques makes it possible to analyze quantitative traits on the basis of individual loci. With marker information, the classical theory of estimating the genetic covariance between relatives can be reformulated to improve the accuracy of estimation. In this study, an algorithm was derived for computing the conditional covariance between relatives given genetic markers. Procedures for calculating the conditional relationship coefficients for additive, dominance, additive by additive, additive by dominance, dominance by additive and dominance by dominance effects were developed. The relationship coefficients were computed based on conditional QTL allelic transmission probabilities, which were inferred from the marker allelic transmission probabilities. An example data set with pedigree and linked markers was used to demonstrate the methods developed. Although this study dealt with two QTLs coupled with linked markers, the same principle can be readily extended to the situation of multiple QTL. The treatment of missing marker information and unknown linkage phase between markers for calculating the covariance between relatives was discussed.     

Mapping quantitative trait loci by genotyping haploid tissues.

Mapping strategies based on a half- or full-sib family design have been developed to map quantitative trait loci (QTL) for outcrossing species. However, these strategies are dependent on controlled crosses where marker-allelic frequency and linkage disequilibrium between the marker and QTL may limit their application. In this article, a maximum-likelihood method is developed to map QTL segregating in an open-pollinated progeny population using dominant markers derived from haploid tissues from single meiotic events. Results from the haploid-based mapping strategy are not influenced by the allelic frequencies of markers and their linkage disequilibria with QTL, because the probabilities of QTL genotypes conditional on marker genotypes of haploid tissues are independent of these population parameters. Parameter estimation and hypothesis testing are implemented via expectation/conditional maximization algorithm. Parameters estimated include the additive effect, the dominant effect, the population mean, the chromosomal location of the QTL in the interval, and the residual variance within the QTL genotypes, plus two population parameters, outcrossing rate and QTL-allelic frequency. Simulation experiments show that the accuracy and power of parameter estimates are affected by the magnitude of QTL effects, heritability levels of a trait, and sample sizes used. The application and limitation of the method are discussed.     

Linear models for joint association and linkage QTL mapping

Background

Populational linkage disequilibrium and within-family linkage are commonly used for QTL mapping and marker assisted selection. The combination of both results in more robust and accurate locations of the QTL, but models proposed so far have been either single marker, complex in practice or well fit to a particular family structure.

Results

We herein present linear model theory to come up with additive effects of the QTL alleles in any member of a general pedigree, conditional to observed markers and pedigree, accounting for possible linkage disequilibrium among QTLs and markers. The model is based on association analysis in the founders; further, the additive effect of the QTLs transmitted to the descendants is a weighted (by the probabilities of transmission) average of the substitution effects of founders'' haplotypes. The model allows for non-complete linkage disequilibrium QTL-markers in the founders. Two submodels are presented: a simple and easy to implement Haley-Knott type regression for half-sib families, and a general mixed (variance component) model for general pedigrees. The model can use information from all markers. The performance of the regression method is compared by simulation with a more complex IBD method by Meuwissen and Goddard. Numerical examples are provided.

Conclusion

The linear model theory provides a useful framework for QTL mapping with dense marker maps. Results show similar accuracies but a bias of the IBD method towards the center of the region. Computations for the linear regression model are extremely simple, in contrast with IBD methods. Extensions of the model to genomic selection and multi-QTL mapping are straightforward.     

Precision Mapping of Quantitative Trait Loci

Adequate separation of effects of possible multiple linked quantitative trait loci (QTLs) on mapping QTLs is the key to increasing the precision of QTL mapping. A new method of QTL mapping is proposed and analyzed in this paper by combining interval mapping with multiple regression. The basis of the proposed method is an interval test in which the test statistic on a marker interval is made to be unaffected by QTLs located outside a defined interval. This is achieved by fitting other genetic markers in the statistical model as a control when performing interval mapping. Compared with the current QTL mapping method (i.e., the interval mapping method which uses a pair or two pairs of markers for mapping QTLs), this method has several advantages. (1) By confining the test to one region at a time, it reduces a multiple dimensional search problem (for multiple QTLs) to a one dimensional search problem. (2) By conditioning linked markers in the test, the sensitivity of the test statistic to the position of individual QTLs is increased, and the precision of QTL mapping can be improved. (3) By selectively and simultaneously using other markers in the analysis, the efficiency of QTL mapping can be also improved. The behavior of the test statistic under the null hypothesis and appropriate critical value of the test statistic for an overall test in a genome are discussed and analyzed. A simulation study of QTL mapping is also presented which illustrates the utility, properties, advantages and disadvantages of the method.     

植物QTL定位方法的研究进展

本文系统地介绍了QTL定位的单一标记分析法、区间作图法以及复合区间作图法、混合显性模型的分析方法,概述了一些主要定位方法的分析原理、存在的主要优缺点。单一标记分析法可以采用方差分析、回归分析或似然比检验的方法分析。区间作图法和复合区间作图法是基于两个相邻标记的QTL定位方法,可采用回归分析或最大似然法分析。复合区间作图法在模型中包括了与其他QTL连锁的标记,可以提高作图的精度和效率。混合线性模型的QTL定位方法可以包括复杂的遗传效应及QTL与环境的互作效应,具有更广阔的应用前景。 Abstract:QTL mapping methods are reviewed for single-marker mapping,interval mapping,composite interval mapping,and mixed-model based method.Statistical approaches along with their properties are discussed for the mapping methods.ANOVA,regression method and likelihood ratio test can be applied in single-marker mapping.Interval mapping and composite interval mapping can be conducted,based on two interval markers,by regression method and maximum likelihood method.Since markers linked with other QTLs are include in the model,composite interval mapping is more precision and powerful.Mapping QTL by mixed-model approaches is more applicable when complicated QTL effects as well as QTL by environment interaction are analyzed.     

Generalized Linear Model for Mapping Discrete Trait Loci Implemented with LASSO Algorithm

Generalized estimating equation (GEE) algorithm under a heterogeneous residual variance model is an extension of the iteratively reweighted least squares (IRLS) method for continuous traits to discrete traits. In contrast to mixture model-based expectation–maximization (EM) algorithm, the GEE algorithm can well detect quantitative trait locus (QTL), especially large effect QTLs located in large marker intervals in the manner of high computing speed. Based on a single QTL model, however, the GEE algorithm has very limited statistical power to detect multiple QTLs because of ignoring other linked QTLs. In this study, the fast least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) is derived for generalized linear model (GLM) with all possible link functions. Under a heterogeneous residual variance model, the LASSO for GLM is used to iteratively estimate the non-zero genetic effects of those loci over entire genome. The iteratively reweighted LASSO is therefore extended to mapping QTL for discrete traits, such as ordinal, binary, and Poisson traits. The simulated and real data analyses are conducted to demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed method to simultaneously identify multiple QTLs for binary and Poisson traits as examples.     

Multipoint identity-by-descent prediction using dense markers to map quantitative trait loci and estimate effective population size

A novel multipoint method, based on an approximate coalescence approach, to analyze multiple linked markers is presented. Unlike other approximate coalescence methods, it considers all markers simultaneously but only two haplotypes at a time. We demonstrate the use of this method for linkage disequilibrium (LD) mapping of QTL and estimation of effective population size. The method estimates identity-by-descent (IBD) probabilities between pairs of marker haplotypes. Both LD and combined linkage and LD mapping rely on such IBD probabilities. The method is approximate in that it considers only the information on a pair of haplotypes, whereas a full modeling of the coalescence process would simultaneously consider all haplotypes. However, full coalescence modeling is computationally feasible only for few linked markers. Using simulations of the coalescence process, the method is shown to give almost unbiased estimates of the effective population size. Compared to direct marker and haplotype association analyses, IBD-based QTL mapping showed clearly a higher power to detect a QTL and a more realistic confidence interval for its position. The modeling of LD could be extended to estimate other LD-related parameters such as recombination rates.     

A simulation study on the accuracy of position and effect estimates of linked QTL and their asymptotic standard deviations using multiple interval mapping in an F2 scheme

Approaches like multiple interval mapping using a multiple-QTL model for simultaneously mapping QTL can aid the identification of multiple QTL, improve the precision of estimating QTL positions and effects, and are able to identify patterns and individual elements of QTL epistasis. Because of the statistical problems in analytically deriving the standard errors and the distributional form of the estimates and because the use of resampling techniques is not feasible for several linked QTL, there is the need to perform large-scale simulation studies in order to evaluate the accuracy of multiple interval mapping for linked QTL and to assess confidence intervals based on the standard statistical theory. From our simulation study it can be concluded that in comparison with a monogenetic background a reliable and accurate estimation of QTL positions and QTL effects of multiple QTL in a linkage group requires much more information from the data. The reduction of the marker interval size from 10 cM to 5 cM led to a higher power in QTL detection and to a remarkable improvement of the QTL position as well as the QTL effect estimates. This is different from the findings for (single) interval mapping. The empirical standard deviations of the genetic effect estimates were generally large and they were the largest for the epistatic effects. These of the dominance effects were larger than those of the additive effects. The asymptotic standard deviation of the position estimates was not a good criterion for the accuracy of the position estimates and confidence intervals based on the standard statistical theory had a clearly smaller empirical coverage probability as compared to the nominal probability. Furthermore the asymptotic standard deviation of the additive, dominance and epistatic effects did not reflect the empirical standard deviations of the estimates very well, when the relative QTL variance was smaller/equal to 0.5. The implications of the above findings are discussed.     

Statistical model for characterizing epistatic control of triploid endosperm triggered by maternal and offspring QTLs

To study the effects of maternal and endosperm quantitative trait locus (QTL) interaction on endosperm development, we derive a two-stage hierarchical statistical model within the maximum-likelihood context, implemented with an expectation-maximization algorithm. A model incorporating both maternal and offspring marker information can improve the accuracy and precision of genetic mapping. Extensive simulations under different sampling strategies, heritability levels and gene action modes were performed to investigate the statistical properties of the model. The QTL location and parameters are better estimated when two QTLs are located at different intervals than when they are located at the same interval. Also, the additive effect of the offspring QTLs is better estimated than the additive effect of the maternal QTLs. The implications of our model for agricultural and evolutionary genetic research are discussed.