Physiological Function of Night Interruption in Lemna paucicostata 6746: Action of Light as a Phaser on the Photoperiodic Clock

Flowering of Lemna paucicostata 6746 under short-day conditionsis completely inhibited by daily night interruption given tothe "inhibition zone" that starts at Zeitgeber time (ZT) 14,i.e., 14 h after dawn, and ends 14 h before the next dusk [Oota(1983a) Plant & Cell Physiol. 24: 327]. With a modifiedmin-SD method, most of these night interruptions were foundto signal the false dawn (false ZT 0) after one entraining cycle.Thus, on and after day 2 the interruption was associated withthe next main photoperiod to form a noninductive skeleton photoperiod.However, a light pulse applied at the start of the inhibitionzone, caused no phase shift in the photoperiodic clock, andformed a noninductive skeleton photoperiod in association withthe preceding main photoperiod. The complete floral inhibition due to the night interruptionwas ascribed to the illumination of both the LI-phase (realor false ZT 0) and L2-phase (real or false ZT 14), or the twolight-sensitive fractions of the original or shifted criticalphotoperiod, by the thus formed skeleton photoperiod, just aswas the case for the floral inhibition by complete photoperiodslonger than the critical daylength, 14 h [Oota (1983a), Oota(1983b) Plant & Cell Physiol. 24: 1503]. (Received October 20, 1983; Accepted January 7, 1984)     

Bimodal Floral Response of Lemna gibba G3 to Night Interruption: Photoperiodic Time Measurement

Lemna gibba G3 (M-1% sucrose medium, 26°C) showed a bimodalfloral response to a 2-hr light pulse scanning 21-, 18-, 15-and 12-hr nyctoperiods. With the simplified min-LD method, thelight pulse given early or late in these nyctoperiods was foundto signal false dusk or false dawn after two transient cycles.The magnitude of floral response to the light pulse dependedon the length of the asymmetric skeleton photoperiod comprisingeither the preceding main photoperiod and the false dusk orthe false dawn and the subsequent main photoperiod. No flowerwas induced by asymmetric skeleton photoperiods shorter thanthe critical daylength, 12 hr. In duckweed previously entrainedto an interrupted 15-hr nyctoperiod, false dawn or false duskwas physiologically equivalent to the light-requiring L1- orL2-phase of the critical photoperiod. Another light-requiringphase occurred 12 hr after or before the false dawn or falsedusk. These and relevant findings suggest that the timing ofthe L1- and L2-phases is under the control of the endogenouscircadian oscillator and that the skeleton as well as completephotoperiods are inductive only when both the L1- and L2-phases,whether they are shifted or not due to night interruption, areilluminated. (Received October 3, 1980; Accepted December 3, 1980)     

Photoperiod and Temperature Regulation of Floral Initiation and Anthesis in Soya Bean

Floral development includes initiation of floral primordia andsubsequent anthesis as discrete events, even though in manyinvestigations only anthesis is considered. For ‘Ransom’soya bean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] grown at day/night temperaturesof 18/14, 22/18, 26/22, 30/26, and 34/30 °C and exposedto photoperiods of 10, 12, 14, 15, and 16 h, time of anthesisranged from less than 21 days after exposure at the shorterphotoperiods and warmer temperatures to more than 60 days atlonger photoperiods and cooler temperatures. For all temperatureregimes, however, floral primordia were initiated under shorterphotopenods within 3 to 5 days after exposure and after notmore than 7 to 10 days exposure to longer photoperiods. Onceinitiation had begun, time required for differentiation of individualfloral primordia and the duration of leaf initiation at shootapices increased with increasing length of photoperiod. Whileproduction of nodes ceased abruptly under photoperiods of 10and 12 h, new nodes continued to be formed concurrently withinitiation of axillary floral primordia under photoperiods of14, 15 and 16 h. The vegetative condition at the main stem shootapex was prolonged under the three longer photoperiods and issuggestive of the existence of an intermediate apex under theseconditions. The results indicate that initiation and anthesisare controlled independently rather than collectively by photoperiod,and that floral initiation consists of two independent steps—onefor the first-initiated flower in an axil of a main stem leafand a second for transformation of the terminal shoot apex fromthe vegetative to reproductive condition. Apical meristem, intermediate apex, floral initiation, anthesis, photoinduction, Glycine max(L.) Merrill, soya bean, photoperiod, temperature     

Environmental Control of Flowering in Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). II. Rate of Developement as a Function of Temperature and Photoperiod and its Modification by Low-temperature Vernalization

Plants of six contrasting genotypes of barley were raised fromvernalized (imbibed at 1 °C for 30 d) or non-vernalizedseeds and grown in 12 different controlled environments comprisingfactorial combinations of three photoperiods (10, 13 and 16h d^–1), two day temperatures (18 and 28 °C) and twonight temperatures (5 and 13 °C). Except at longer daysfor Athenais or Arabi Abiad, the 28 °C day temperature wasgenerally supra-optimal and delayed awn emergence. At lowertemperatures and in photoperiods shorter than the critical value,P_C, which delay awn emergence, the time from sowing to awn emergencefor five of the genotypes conformed to the equation 1/f=a +bT{macron}+cPwhere f is the time to awn emergence (d), T{macron} is meandiurnal temperature (°C), P is photoperiod (h d^–1)and a, b and c are genotype-specific constants. In Arabi Abiad,however, significant responses to temperature were not detected.The low temperature pre-treatment of the seeds reduced the subsequenttime to awn emergence in Athenais and the autumn-sown genotypesAger, Arabi Abiad and Gerbel B, especially in longer days, buteither had no effect or tended to delay awn emergence in thespring-sown types Emir and Mona. In the spring-sown types P_Cwas outside the range investigated (i.e. > 16 h d^–1),but in Ager it was approx. 13 h d^–1 and in Gerbel B justover 13 h d^–1. For plants of Arabi Abiad grown from vernalizedseeds P_c was almost 15 h, but     

Role of the Photoperiod Preceding a Flower-Inductive Dark Period in Dark-Grown Seedlings of Pharbitis nil Choisy

Flowering responses to a single photoperiod, of various durationsand irradiances, followed by an inductive dark period were investigatedwith dark-grown seedlings of Pharbitis nil Choisy. The numberof flower buds induced in each plant (NFB) increased with theincrease of both duration and irradiance of the photoperiod.Reciprocity did not hold for this photoresponse within the rangeof 0-16 h and 2.5-10 W-m^-2, NFB depending on the duration ratherthan the irradiance. With lengthening of the dark period followinga photoperiod of 8 h or less, two different phases alternatelyappeared so that NFB sharply increased at 20-24 h and 40-43h after the onset of the photoperiod, then gradually decreased.When the photoperiod was longer than 8 h, NFB sharply increasedat 12–16 h after the end of the photoperiod and remainedaround the saturated value with longer dark periods. Far-redlight given immediately after the photoperiod inhibited flowering,the inhibitory effect being stronger the shorter the photoperiod.This far-red effect is mediated by phytochrome and P_FR seemsto be required during the inductive dark period following ashort photoperiod for floral induction. (Received December 23, 1983; Accepted April 12, 1984)     

The action of skeleton photoperiods on flowering in Lemna perpusilla

The effects of 24 hr cycle skeleton photoperiodic schedulesinvolving two short light pulses on flowering in Lemna perpusillahave been studied. Simulation of complete photoperiods by correspondingskeletal ones is nearly perfect for all photoperiods up to 8hr and is unstable for periods of 9 to 13 hr. A jump in theresponse phase appears when skeleton photoperiods ranging from12 to 13hr are given. For all skeleton photoperiods longer than14 hr the phase is entrained so that it agrees with that givenby skeleton photoperiods of complemental lengths. That is, askeleton photoperiod of 18 hr is equivalent to that of 6 (=24–18) hr. Simulation is largely related to whether thesecond pulse is locked on to "dawn" or to "sunset" dependingon when it falls during the dark period following the firstpulse. The inductive action of skeleton photoperiods that gives unstableentrainment depends on the length of a preliminary dark periodgiven before the plant receives the first pulse, since in theseskeleton schedules the sensitive zone to the second pulse shiftswith the length of the preliminary darkness. Thus, we tentatively conclude that the circadian oscillationin L. perpusilla involves an entrainment mechanism and thatphotoperiodic induction is contingent on the coincidence oflight and a specific inductive phase in oscillation. (Received September 18, 1968; )     

Development Rate in Wheat as Affected by Duration and Rate of Change of Photoperiod

A field study was conducted to test the hypothesis that wheatdevelopment rate responds to the rate of change of photoperiod.Two wheat cultivars (Condor and Thatcher) were sown on 18 Aug.1992 at Melbourne (38° S). Photoperiod was extended artificiallyto give five treatments up to terminal spikelet initiation (TS)viz.: natural photoperiod (rate of change of photoperiod, 2·3mind d^-1), two faster rates of change (9·8 and 13·1min d^-1) and two constant photoperiods of 14·0 and 15·5h. After TS, the two constant photoperiods were extended to15·0 and 16·5 h, respectively and treatments wererandomly re-allocated, i.e. some plots received different photoperiodregimes before and after TS. There were no significant differences among treatments in thelength of the period from sowing (S) to seedling emergence (E)phase, ranging from 15 to 16·3 d. The rate of developmentfrom E to TS responded to increases in photoperiod in both cultivars,increasing with average photoperiod across all treatments butthere was no effect of rate of change of photoperiod independentof its average photoperiod. The rate of development from TSto anthesis (A) did not show any trend with average photoperiod.This lack of effect of photoperiod on the period from TS toA contrasts with other results from the literature and possiblereasons for this conflicting result are discussed. Rate of changeof photoperiod did not affect the duration of the phase fromTS to A either. Therefore, the effect of photoperiod on theduration of the S-A period was strongly and positively correlatedto that of the length of the E-TS phase.Copyright 1994, 1999Academic Press Triticum aestivum L., wheat, phasic development, photoperiod, rate of change     

The Growth and Development of the Wheat Apex: The Effects of Photoperiod on Spikelet Production and Sucrose Concentration in the Apex

Spring wheat (Triticum aestivum cv. Warimba) plants were grownin a controlled environment (20°C) in two photoperiods (8or 16 h). In the first instance, plants were maintained in eachof the photoperiods from germination onwards at the same irradiance(375 µE m^–2 s^–1). In the second case, allplants were grown in a long photoperiod until 4 days after double-ridgeinitiation when half the plants were transferred to a shortphotoperiod with double the irradiance (16 h photoperiod at225 or 8 h at 475 µE ^–2 s^–1). The rates of growth and development of the apices were promotedby the longer photoperiod in both experiments. Shoot dry weightgain was proportional to the total light energy received perday whereas the dry weight of the shoot apex increased withincreasing photoperiod even when the total daily irradiancewas constant. The principal soluble carbohydrate present in the shoot apexwas sucrose, although low concentrations of glucose and fructosewere found in the apices of long photoperiod plants late indevelopment. Sucrose concentration was invariably greater inthe slow-growing apices of short photoperiod plants, but roseto approach this level in the long photoperiod plants when theterminal spikelet had been initiated. Triticum aestivum, wheat, apex, spikelet initiation, photoperiod, flower initiation     

Measurement of the Critical Nyctoperiod by Lemna paucicostata 6746 Grown in Continuous Light

The short-day duckweed Lemna paucicostata 6746 could be inducedto flower in two days at 26C when continuous illumination forentrainment was followed by continuous darkness. This 48-h darkperiod or the minimum darkness requirement for floral inductionwas called the induction period. The length of the inductionperiod (IP) was routinely computed as the number of 24-h cyclesusing the equation of regression of flower number in logarithmon culture time. A light pulse given about 7 h after the startof the induction period increased the apparent IP value fromtwo to three, suggesting that the interrupted first day hadfunctioned as a noninductive day. A pulse given at any otherpart of the induction period did not modify the IP value. Thelight-sensitive part is probably the inducible phase, and thefirst 7-h period of darkness terminated by it seems to be thecritical nyctoperiod. These and relevant facts suggest thatthe light-off oscillator measures the critical night length,7 h. Either red or far-red irradiation at the inducible phase extendedthe IP value by one. No red/far-red photoreversibility was detected.As expected, however, red or far-red irradiation of any otherpart of the critical nyctoperiod could not modify the IP value. (Received February 8, 1985; Accepted May 14, 1985)     

The Effects of Temperature, Photoperiod and Light Integral on the Time to Flowering of Pansy cv. Universal Violet (ViolaxwittrockianaGams.)

The effects of temperature, photoperiod and light integral onthe time to first flowering of pansy (ViolaxwittrockianaGams)were investigated. Plants were grown at six temperatures (meansbetween 14.8 and 26.1 °C), combined with four photoperiods(8, 11, 14 and 17 h). The rate of progress to flowering increasedlinearly with temperature (up to an optimum of 21.7 °C)and with increase in photoperiod (r²=0.91, 19 d.f.), the latterindicating that pansies are quantitative long day plants (LDPs).In a second experiment, plants were sown on five dates betweenJuly and December 1992 and grown in glasshouse compartmentsunder natural day lengths at six temperatures (means between9.4 and 26.3 °C). The optimum temperature for time to floweringdecreased linearly (from 21.3 °C) with declining light integralfrom 3.4 MJ m^-2d^-1(total solar radiation). Data from both experimentswere used to construct a photo-thermal model of flowering inpansy. This assumed that the rate of progress to flowering increasedas an additive linear function of light integral, temperatureand photoperiod. Independent data from plants sown on threedates, and grown at five temperatures (means between 9.8 and23.6 °C) were used to validate this model which gave a goodfit to the data (r²=0.88, 15 d.f.). Possible confounding ofthe effects of photoperiod and light integral are discussed. Pansy;Violaxwittrockiana; flowering; photo-thermal model; temperature; photoperiod; light integral     

Variation in the Durations of the Photoperiod-sensitive and Photoperiod-insensitive Phases of Development to Flowering Among Eight Maturity Isolines of Soyabean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill]

In soyabean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill] the period between sowingand flowering is comprised of three successive developmentalphases—pre-inductive, inductive and post-inductive—inwhich the rate of development is affected, respectively, bytemperature only, by photoperiod and temperature, and then againby temperature only. A reciprocal-transfer experiment (carriedout at a mean temperature of 25°C) in which cohorts of plantswere transferred successively between short and long photoperiodsand vice-versa showed that eight combinations of three pairsof maturity alleles (E₁/e₁, E₂ /e₂, E₃ /e₃) had their greatesteffect on the duration of the inductive phase in long days.This phase was increased with the increasing photoperiod sensitivityinduced by the different gene combinations, and ranged fromabout 27 to 54 d according to genotype. In a short day regime(11·5 h d^-1), less than the critical photoperiod, theduration of the inductive phase was brief—requiring about11 photoperiodic cycles in the less photoperiod-sensitive genotypesand only about seven cycles in the more sensitive ones. Thematurity genes also affected the duration of the two photoperiod-insensitivephases; these durations were positively correlated with thephotoperiod-sensitivity potential of the gene combinations.The largest effect was on the pre-inductive phase which variedfrom 3 to 11 d, while the post-inductive phase varied from about13 to 18 d. As a consequence of these non-photoperiodic effectsof the maturity genes, even in the most inductive regimes (daylengthsless than the critical photoperiod) the time taken to flowerby the less photoperiod-sensitive combinations of maturity geneswas somewhat less than in the more sensitive combinations—rangingfrom about 28 to 34 d. The genetic and practical implicationsof these findings are discussed.Copyright 1994, 1999 AcademicPress Glycine max (L.) Merrill, soyabean, maturity genes, isolines, flowering, photoperiod     

Rate of Leaf Appearance and Final Number of Leaves in Wheat: Effects of Duration and Rate of Change of Photoperiod

This study was conducted to test the hypothesis that photoperiodor its rate of change significantly affects the rate of leafappearance (RLA) and final number of leaves (FNL) in wheat,as suggested from several time-of-sowing experiments. Two wheatcultivars (Condor and Thatcher) were sown in the field on 2Sep. 1992 at Melbourne (38°S). Photoperiod was extendedartificially to give five treatments up to terminal spikeletinitiation (TS) viz.: natural photoperiod (rate of change ofphotoperiod = 2 min d^-1), two faster rates of change (8·5and 13·3 min d^-1) and two constant photoperiods of 14·0and 15·5 h. After TS, the two constant photoperiods wereextended to 15·0 and 16·5 h, respectively, andtreatments were re-randomised, i.e. some plots received differentphotoperiod regimes before and after TS. The rate of leaf appearance maintained strong linear relationshipswith thermal time. It was greater for Condor [0·012-0·013(°C d)^-1] than for Thatcher [0·011-0·012 (°Cd)^-1] and did not alter during plant development or in responseto the change in photoperiod at TS. Rate of leaf appearanceon the main culm was not influenced by the rate of change ofphotoperiod nor by the average photoperiod. Cultivar and photoperiod significantly affected FNL on the mainculm. Condor produced more leaves than Thatcher under long butnot under short photoperiods. The rate of change of photoperioddid not affect FNL independently of the effect of average photoperiod.Most of the variation in FNL due to photoperiod resulted fromdifferences in duration of leaf initiation. The lack of effects of the photoperiod treatments on RLA contrastwith previous reports of its effects on the rate of phasic developmentfrom seedling emergence to double ridge. Therefore, the numberof visible leaves on the main culm (NL) at double ridge andat TS were not constant. However, NL on the main culm at doubleridge was closely correlated with FNL.Copyright 1994, 1999 AcademicPress Triticum aestivum L., wheat, leaf appearance, phyllochron, photoperiod     

The Effects of Temperature and Light Integral on the Phases of Photoperiod Sensitivity inPetuniaxhybrida

Flowering in petunias is hastened by long days, but little isknown about when the plants are most sensitive to photoperiod,or how light integral or temperature affect such phases of sensitivity.The effects of these factors on time to flowering was investigatedusing reciprocal transfer experiments between long (16 h d^-1)and short days (8 h d^-1). The effect of light integral on thephases of photoperiod sensitivity was examined using two sowingdates and a shading treatment (53% transmission). The effectsof temperature were investigated by conducting reciprocal transferexperiments in glasshouse compartments at five temperature regimes(means of 13.7, 19.2, 22.3, 25.0 and 28.7 °C). The lengthof the photoperiod-insensitive juvenile phase of development,when flowering cannot be induced by any environmental stimulus,was sensitive to light integral; low light integrals prolongedthis phase, from 23 d at 2.6 MJ m^-2d^-1to 36 d at 1.6 MJ m^-2d^-1(totalsolar radiation). The length of this development phase was shortest(12.5 d) at 21 °C; it was longer under cooler (21 d at 13.5°C) and warmer temperatures (17.6 d at 28.3 °C). Afterthis phase, time to flowering was influenced greatly by photoperiod,with long days hastening flowering by between 28 and 137 d,compared with short days. Plants also showed some sensitivityto both temperature and light integral during this phase, butthe duration of the final phase of flower development, duringwhich plants were photoperiod-insensitive, was dependent primarilyon the temperature at which the plants were grown; at 14.5 °C,33.9 d were required to complete this phase compared with 11.4d at 25.5 °C. The experimental approach gave valuable informationon the phases of sensitivity to photothermal environment duringthe flowering process, and could provide the basis of a morephysiologically-based quantitative model of flowering than hashitherto been attempted. The information is also useful in thescheduling of lighting and temperature treatments to give optimalflowering times of high quality plants.Copyright 1999 Annalsof Botany Company Petunia,Petuniaxhybrida, juvenility, flowering, photoperiod, temperature, light integral, reciprocal transfer.     

Growth and light absorption of some planktonic cyanobacteria, diatoms and Chlorophyceae under simulated natural light fluctuations

Specific growth rates of Limnozhrix redekei, Planktothrix agardhii(cyanobacteria), Synedraacus, Stephanodiscus minutulus (diatoms),Scenedesmus acuminatus and Scenedesmus armatus (Chlorophyceae)were compared under different time structures of illumination,but the same daily light exposure, at 20C. Fluctuating irradiancesimulating a uniform rapid transport of the algal cells acrossthe aquatic light field on a cloudless day with Z^eu/Z^mix=1 wascompared with constant irradiance throughout the same photoperiodof 12 h length as well as a photoperiod of 6 h length. Fluctuatinglight (30 min for a cycle) resulted in a decrease in specificgrowth rates as compared with constant irradiance at the samephotoperiod length. This decrease amounts to 15–20% fordiatoms, 20–25% for Chlorophyceae and 35–40% forcyanobacteria, respectively. The decrease is somewhat lowerif the fluctuations simulating mixing are slower (60 min fora cycle). The specific growth rate is also decreased by a shorterphotoperiod, but this effect is more species specific. Regardingthe in vivo absorption spectra, fluctuating light or a shorterphotoperiod has little or no effect on the Chlorophyceae anddiatoms studied, whereas cyanobacteria show an increase in lightabsorption by chlorophyll a and phycobilins.     

Effect of Elevated CO2 on Stomatal Size and Distribution in Perennial Ryegrass

Plants of ryegrass (Lolium perenne L. cv. Melle) were grownfrom the early seedling stage in growth cabinets at a day/nighttemperature of 20/15 °C, with a 12-h photoperiod, and aCO₂ concentration of either 340 or 680 ± 15 µl1^–1 CO₂. Young, fully-expanded, acclimated leaves fromprimary branches were sampled for length of stomata, and ofepidermal cells between stomata, numbers of stomata and epidermalcells per unit length of stomatal row, numbers of stomatal rowsacross the leaf and numbers of stomatal rows between adjacentvein ridges. Elevated CO₂ had no significant effect on any ofthe measured parameters. Elevated CO₂, Lolium perenne, ryegrass, stomatal distribution, stomatal size     

The Effect of Cooling on Photosynthesis, Amounts of Carbohydrate and Assimilate Export in Sunflower

Sunflower plants (Helianthus annuus L.) grown at 30°C werecooled to 13°C in the light in atmospheric CO² or low CO²,or in darkness. Photosynthetic rate at 30°C after coolingwhole plants in atmospheric CO² for 12 h during a photoperiodwas significantly lower than at the start of the photoperiodcompared to plants cooled at low CO², those cooled in the darkand those maintained at 30°C. Amounts of sucrose, hexosesand starch in leaves at 13°C increased throughout a 14 hphotoperiod to levels higher than in leaves at 30°C, whereamounts of sucrose and hexoses were stable or falling after4 h. Carbohydrate accumulation at 13°C during this photoperiodwas more than twice that at 30°C. After three photoperiodsand two dark periods at 13°C carbohydrate levels in leaveswere still as high as at the end of the first photoperiod, butless carbohydrate accumulated during the photoperiods than duringthe first photoperiod, and more was partitioned as starch. Amountsof soluble carbohydrate in roots were greater after 14 h at13°C than in roots of plants at 30°C. Loss of ¹⁴C fromleaves at 30°C as a proportion of ¹⁴CO2 fixed by them at30°C, decreased after exposure of plants to 13°C inthe light for 30 min prior to ¹⁴CO²feeding. Results indicatean effect of cold on the transport process that was light-dependent.It is inferred that the reduction in the proportion of ¹⁴C lostfrom leaves after 10 h cooling was due to reduced sink demand,whereas the rise in the proportion of ¹⁴C lost from leaves after24 h reflects reduced photosynthetic rate. The coincidence ofreduced photosynthetic rate with raised carbohydrate levelsin leaves maintained at 30°C throughout, whilst the restof the plant was cooled to 13°C in the light implies feedbackinhibition of photosynthesis. This may reduce the imbalancebetween source and sink in sunflower during the first days oflong-term cooling. Key words: Temperature, carbon export, carbohydrates, photosynthesis, sunflower     

Photoperiod Sensitivity during Flower Development of Opium Poppy (Papaver somniferum L.)

Photoperiod is a major factor in flower development of the opiumpoppy (Papaver somniferum L. ‘album DC’) which isa long-day plant. Predicting time to flower in field-grown opiumpoppy requires knowledge of which stages of growth are sensitiveto photoperiod and how the rate of flower development is influencedby photoperiod. The objective of this work was to determinewhen poppy plants first become sensitive to photoperiod andhow long photoperiod continues to influence the time to firstflower under consistent temperature conditions. Plants weregrown in artificially-lit growth chambers with either a 16-hphotoperiod (highly flower inductive) or a 9-h photoperiod (non-inductive).Plants were transferred at 1 to 3-d intervals from a 16- toa 9-h photoperiod andvice versa . All chambers were maintainedat a 12-h thermoperiod of 25/20 °C. Poppy plants becamesensitive to photoperiod 4 d after emergence and required aminimum of four inductive cycles (short dark periods) beforethe plant flowered. Additional inductive cycles, up to a maximumof nine, hastened flowering. After 13 inductive cycles, floweringtime was no longer influenced by photoperiod. These resultsindicate that the interval between emergence and first flowercan be divided into four phases: (1) a photoperiod-insensitivejuvenile phase (JP); (2) a photoperiod-sensitive inductive phase(PSP); (3) a photoperiod-sensitive post-inductive phase (PSPP);and (4) a photoperiod-insensitive post-inductive phase (PIPP).The minimum durations of these phases forPapaver somniferum‘album DC’ under the conditions of our experimentwere determined as 4 d, 4 d, 9 d, and 14 d, respectively. Anthesis; days to flowering; flower bud; opium poppy; Papaver somniferum L.; photoperiod; photoperiod sensitivity; predicting time to flowering; transfer     

Physiological Structure of the Critical Photoperiod of Lemna paucicostata 6746

The critical day length or the length of the critical photoperiodfor the short-day duckweed, Lemna paucicostata 6746 is about14 h (Oota 1983). With the min-SD method, I found that not thewhole critical photoperiod but only its initial and terminalbrief fractions, called respectively the LI- and L2-phases,need be illuminated for a given day to be a noninductive day.Inversely, the darkened LI- and/or L2-phase makes the day inductive.The rest of the day can be either darkened or illuminated withoutmodifying the inductive or noninductive property of the day. Thus, the physiological structure of the critical photoperiodfor L. paucicostata 6746 closely resembles that of the criticalphotoperiod for the long-day duckweed, L. gibba G3 (Oota 1981). (Received May 24, 1983; Accepted September 21, 1983)     

Photoperiod and Temperature Effects on Late Developmental Stages of Stylosanthes guianensis

Seedlings of Stylosanthes guianensis var. guianensis cv. Cookand S. guianensis var. pauciflora cv. Bandeirante were defoliatedand placed in a naturally lit glasshouse at 23/18 °C, 28/23°C or 33/28 °C (day/night). After exposure to 14 h daysand after floral induction with 30 cycles of 11 h, plants wereallocated to 11, 12, 13 or 14 h during flowering and seed formation. Floral initiation occurred after 10–15 short-day cycles.Flower appearance was hastened by warm temperatures and spikenumber per plant at 20 d after flower appearance was negativelyrelated to temperature and greater in Cook than in Bandeirante.Exposure to 13- and 14-h days reduced the continued differentiationof inflorescences in Bandeirante, and in Cook in warm temperatures.Floret number per spike was greatest at 23/18 °C and a higherproportion of florets aborted in Bandeirante at 33/ 28 °C.Variations in seed setting of the bi-articulate loment of Bandeiranteare described. Highest potential seed yield occurred if afterfloral induction 11 or 12 h days were maintained with 23/18°C or 28/23 °C temperatures. Photoperiod, temperature, development, Stylosanthes guianensis, flowering     

Durations of the Photoperiod-sensitive and Photoperiod-insensitive Phases of Development to Flowering in Four Cultivars of Soyabean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill]

Four cultivars of soyabean [Glycine max (L.) Merill] of diverseorigin were grown in pots in a plastic-house maintained at day/nighttemperatures of 30/20°C. Plants were transferred at varioustimes after sowing from short (11·5 h d^-1) to long (13·5h d^-1) days and vice versa. The times from sowing to first floweringfor control plants grown continuously in short days varied from38 to 53 d, whereas the flowering of plants grown continuouslyin long days was delayed by about 20 d in each cultivar. Theduration of the initial photoperiod-insensitive phase (oftencalled the juvenile phase) varied three-fold between cultivars,i.e. from 11 to 33 d. As expected, the duration of the photoperiod-sensitivephase was greater in long days, but there was comparativelylittle genetic variation in photoperiod-sensitivity as definedin terms of days delay in time to flowering per hour increasein photoperiod (9-11 d h^-1). Similarly, there was little variationin the photoperiod-insensitive post-inductive phase; it rangedfrom 15 to 20 d. In consequence, the duration of the initialphotoperiod-insensitive phase was a strong determinant of timeto first flowering in these cultivars. The importance of thisso-called juvenile trait is discussed in terms of preventingthe premature flowering of USA-adapted cultivars when grownin short tropical daylengths and thus improving the adaptationof the crop to the lower latitudes.Copyright 1993, 1999 AcademicPress Glycine max (L.) Merill, soyabean, photoperiodism, juvenility, flowering