Factors influencing the growth hormone response to growth hormone-releasing hormone in children with idiopathic growth hormone deficiency

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the factors influencing the growth hormone (GH) response to GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) test in idiopathic GH deficiency. METHODS: 28 patients aged 4.9 +/- 0.7 years with certain GH deficiency were given GHRH (2 microg/kg). RESULTS: The GH peak after GHRH was correlated negatively with age at evaluation (r = -0.37, p < 0.05) and body mass index (r = -0.44, p = 0.02), and positively with anterior pituitary height (r = 0.47, p = 0.02), GH peak after non-GHRH stimulation (r = 0.78, p < 0.0001) and spontaneous GH peak (r = 0.82, p = 0.007). It was lower in the patients aged >5 years than in the youngest (p = 0.04), but it was similar in the patients with and without features suggesting a hypothalamic origin. CONCLUSION: The GH response to GHRH test cannot be used to differentiate between hypothalamic and pituitary forms of idiopathic GH deficiency, probably because the GH response decreases after the first 5 years of life, whatever the origin of the deficiency.     

Growth hormone responses to sleep, insulin hypoglycaemia and arginine infusion

This study compares the peak serum growth hormone (GH) concentration during slow wave sleep with the serum GH responses to insulin-induced hypoglycaemia and intravenous arginine infusion in 23 children referred because of short stature (20) or precocious puberty (3). Peak serum GH concentration during sleep correlated significantly with peak GH response to insulin hypoglycaemia (r = 0.64, p less than 0.01) and arginine infusion (r = 0.57, p less than 0.01). 3 children had subnormal (less than 15 mU/l) peak serum GH concentrations during sleep but normal responses to either insulin-induced hypoglycaemia or intravenous arginine infusion. 1 child had a normal peak serum GH response to sleep but subnormal responses to insulin and arginine. Sleep studies of GH secretion may be indicated when the GH responses to pharmacological stimuli are inconsistent with the observed growth pattern.     

Effects of acute intravenous injection of two growth hormone-releasing hormones (GHRH 1-40 and 1-29) on serum growth hormone and other pituitary hormones in short children with pulsatile growth hormone secretion

We administered two different growth hormone-releasing hormones (GHRH) to 20 short, prepubertal children who had spontaneous secretion of growth hormone (GH), assessed from 24-hour GH secretion profiles (72 sampling periods of 20 min). We compared one i.v. injection of 1 microgram/kg of GHRH 1-40 with that of GHRH 1-29 regarding serum concentrations of GH, prolactin, luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone and IGF-I. The children were allocated to two groups without statistical randomization. Both groups were given both peptides, with at least 1 week in between. The first group started with GHRH 1-40, the other with GHRH 1-29. The peptides both induced an increased serum concentration of GH of the same magnitude: mean maximal peak of 89 +/- 12 mU/l after GHRH 1-40 and 94 +/- 10 mU/l after GHRH 1-29 (n.s.). The mean difference in maximum serum GH concentration in each child after injection was 52 +/- 9 mU/l, range 1-153 mU/l. GHRH 1-29 also induced a short-term, small increase in the concentrations of prolactin (p less than 0.05), luteinizing hormone (p less than 0.01) and follicle-stimulating hormone (p less than 0.05). We conclude that the shorter sequence GHRH 1-29, when given in a dose of 1 microgram/kg, gives a rise in serum concentration of GH similar to that after the native form GHRH 1-40.     

Growth hormone (GH) profiles with successive provocation by GH-releasing hormone and arginine in children: a clinical appraisal

To establish a single and reliable test for evaluating growth hormone (GH) secretion, we examined successive GH provocation by two agents with different modes of action, GH releasing-hormone (GHRH) and arginine (Arg) in 60 children of short stature, 6 patients with pituitary dwarfism and 9 normal young adults. Their GH profiles were qualitatively classified into 4 types: 25 children and 7 adults responded to both stimuli with 2 GH peaks (48.7 +/- 4.3 [SEM] micrograms/L for GHRH and 32.2 +/- 2.6 micrograms/L for Arg in children; 25.8 +/- 7.6 micrograms/L and 30.1 +/- 9.2 micrograms/L respectively in adults) (type A). A single peak for GHRH (57.7 +/- 4.6 micrograms/L) without an Arg-induced peak was obtained in 29 younger children (type B), which is considered to be a GHRH-dominant pattern. Two of them were diagnosed as hypothalamic GHRH deficiency based on a low nocturnal plasma GH and good response to GH treatment. Six adolescents and 2 adults showed a blunted response to GHRH (9.0 +/- 1.1 micrograms/L) but a normal response to Arg (40.6 +/- 9.5 micrograms/L) (type C), which appears to be caused by somatostatin (SRIH) hypertonicity. None with pituitary dwarfism responded to both stimuli (4.5 +/- 1.3 and 2.3 +/- 0.5 micrograms/L). Thus, the GHRH-Arg test makes it possible to evaluate the counterbalance between GHRH and SRIH as well as to differentiate pituitary GH deficiency from hypothalamic GHRH dysfunction.     

Pyridostigmine enhances even if it does not normalize the growth hormone responses to growth hormone-releasing hormone in patients with Cushing's disease.

Subjects with Cushing's disease have diminished growth hormone (GH) response to growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH). The aim of our study was to investigate the underlying mechanism of this diminished GH response in these patients using pyridostigmine (PD), an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, which is reported to increase GH secretion by reducing somatostatin tone. Eight subjects with untreated Cushing's disease (caused by a pituitary adenoma) and 6 control subjects received GHRH 100 micrograms in 1 ml of saline, as intravenous bolus injection 60 min after (1) placebo (2 tablets, p.o.) or (2) PD (120 mg, p.o.). After GHRH plus placebo, the GH peak (mean +/- SEM) was significantly lower in subjects with Cushing's disease (2.4 +/- 0.5 micrograms/l) compared to control subjects (25.1 +/- 1.8 micrograms/l, p less than 0.05). After GHRH plus PD, the GH peak was significantly enhanced both in subjects with Cushing's disease (7.1 +/- 2.3 micrograms/l, p less than 0.05) and in control subjects (42.3 +/- 4.3 micrograms/l, p less than 0.05). In patients with Cushing's disease, the GH response to GHRH plus PD was lower with respect to the GH response to GHRH alone in normal subjects. We conclude that hypercortisolism may cause a decrease in central cholinergic tone which is in turn hypothesized to be responsible of an enhanced somatostatin release from the hypothalamus. However, other metabolic or central nervous system alterations may act synergistically with hypercortisolism in causing GH inhibition in patients with Cushing's disease.     

Robust growth hormone (GH) secretion in aged female rats co-administered GH-releasing hexapeptide (GHRP-6) and GH-releasing hormone (GHRH)

Aging is associated with a blunted growth hormone (GH) secretory response to GH-releasing hormone (GHRH), in vivo. The objective of the present study was to assess the effects of aging on the GH secretory response to GH-releasing hexapeptide (GHRP-6), a synthetic GH secretagogue. GHRP-6 (30 micrograms/kg) was administered alone or in combination with GHRH (2 micrograms/kg) to anesthetized female Fischer 344 rats, 3 or 19 months of age. The peptides were co-administered to determine the effect of aging upon the potentiating effect of GHRP-6 on GHRH activity. The increase in plasma GH as a function of time following administration of GHRP-6 was lower (p less than 0.001) in old rats than in young rats; whereas the increase in plasma GH secretion as a function of time following co-administration of GHRP-6 and GHRH was higher (p less than 0.001) in old rats than in young rats (mean Cmax = 8539 +/- 790.6 micrograms/l vs. 2970 +/- 866 micrograms/l, respectively; p less than 0.01). Since pituitary GH concentrations in old rats were lower than in young rats (257.0 +/- 59.8 micrograms/mg wet wt. vs. 639.7 +/- 149.2 micrograms/mg wet wt., respectively; p less than 0.03), the results suggested that GH functional reserve in old female rats was not linked to pituitary GH concentration. The differential responses of old rats to individually administered and co-administered GHRP-6 are important because they demonstrate that robust and immediate GH secretion can occur in old rats that are appropriately stimulated. The data further suggest that the cellular processes subserving GH secretion are intact in old rats, and that age-related decrements in GH secretion result from inadequate stimulation, rather than to maladaptive changes in the mechanism of GH release.     

Effect of arginine on the GHRH-stimulated GH secretion in patients with hyperthyroidism.

Patients with hyperthyroidism have reduced GH responses to pharmacological stimuli and reduced spontaneous nocturnal GH secretion. The stimulatory effect of arginine on GH secretion has been suggested to depend on a decrease in hypothalamic somatostatin tone. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effects of arginine on the GH-releasing hormone (GHRH)-stimulated GH secretion in patients with hyperthyroidism. Six hyperthyroid patients with recent diagnosis of Graves' disease [mean age +/- SEM, 39.2 +/- 1.4 years; body mass index (BMI) 22 +/- 0.4 kg/m2] and 6 healthy nonobese volunteers (4 males, 2 females; mean age +/- SEM, 35 +/- 3.5 years) underwent two experimental trials at no less than 7-day intervals: GHRH (100 micrograms, i.v.)-induced GH secretion was evaluated after 30 min i.v. infusion of saline (100 ml) or arginine (30 g) in 100 ml of saline. Hyperthyroid patients showed blunted GH peaks after GHRH (13.2 +/- 2.9 micrograms/l) as compared with normal subjects (23.8 +/- 3.9 micrograms/l, p < 0.05). GH peaks after GHRH were only slightly enhanced by arginine in hyperthyroid subjects (17.6 +/- 2.9 micrograms/l), whereas, in normal subjects, the enhancement was clear cut (36.6 +/- 4.4 micrograms/l; p < 0.05). GH values after arginine + GHRH were still lower in hyperthyroid patients with respect to normal subjects. Our data demonstrate that arginine enhances but does not normalize the GH response to GHRH in patients with hyperthyroidism when compared with normal subjects. We hypothesize that hyperthyroxinemia may decrease GH secretion, both increasing somatostatin tone and acting directly at the pituitary level.     

Acylated ghrelin secretion is acutely suppressed by oral glucose load or insulin-induced hypoglycemia independently of basal growth hormone secretion in humans

BACKGROUND: Ghrelin has been reported to be the natural ligand of growth hormone (GH) secretagogue receptor, and it is known that exogenous ghrelin administration strongly stimulates GH release in humans. However, the effects of endogenous ghrelin on GH secretion and changes in ghrelin levels during dynamic changes in GH levels are not well understood. METHODS: Therefore, we measured circulating acylated ghrelin concentrations during oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs) in patients with active acromegaly (AA, n = 9) and in age/sex/BMI-matched group A controls (n = 12), and during insulin tolerance testing (ITT) in patients with GH deficiency (GHD, n = 10) and in group B controls (n = 10). Plasma acylated ghrelin, serum GH, insulin and glucose levels were measured during each test. RESULTS: Fasting plasma ghrelin levels correlated negatively with serum insulin levels in both group A and B controls (r = -0.665; p < 0.05) but not in patients with AA or GHD. During OGTTs, circulating ghrelin levels decreased significantly with a nadir at 30 min in both patients with AA (p < 0.05) and group A controls (p < 0.01). Also, ITTs were followed by a significant decrease in circulating ghrelin levels with a nadir at 30 min in patients with GHD (p < 0.05) and in group B controls (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The results of the study show that at baseline acylated ghrelin levels do not differ with respect to the GH status (GH excess or GH deficiency) and, furthermore, the suppression of acylated ghrelin levels during OGTT or ITT is independent of the GH response to the tests.     

Growth and growth hormone status after a bone marrow transplant

The three most common clinical situations which have given rise to diagnostic and therapeutic issues involve the child treated for: (1) a brain tumour or extracranial tumour with radiotherapy (XRT) which includes an XRT dose of > or =30 Gy to the hypothalamic-pituitary axis; (2) acute lymphoblastic leukaemia with a cranial XRT dose of 18-24 Gy, and (3) haematological malignancy or solid tumour requiring total body irradiation (dose 10-14 Gy) and BMT. The decision about the intent to treat and the timing of GH replacement needs to be taken in collaboration with the paediatric oncologist who will provide guidance about overall prognosis and the risk of relapse. After a dose of > or =30 Gy to the hypothalamic pituitary axis the risk of GH deficiency (GHD) 2 years later is very high (>50%) and therefore there is 'solid' epidemiological evidence, which predicts outcome. Therapeutically the choice is whether or not to offer GH replacement at 2 years in the presence of biochemical evidence of GHD but independent of auxology, or wait until the growth rate declines. Diagnostically the IGF-1 SDS is more useful than previously thought, particularly if XRT-induced GHD is severe; there may, however, be systematic discordancy between the GH responses to different pharmacological stimuli (ITT vs. arginine). For irradiated children in categories 2 and 3, greater emphasis is placed on auxology in determining the need for assessment of GH status. Early rather than very precocious puberty is a real issue and needs to be actively treated with a GnRH analogue if final height appears to be significantly compromised.     

Growth hormone response to growth hormone releasing hormone 1-40 in Turner's syndrome

The response of growth hormone (GH) to acute administration of GH-releasing hormone 1-40 (GHRH) was evaluated in 12 patients with Turner's syndrome and in 12 prepubertal or early pubertal girls. In 7 of 12 patients GHRH induced a definite increase (greater than 10 ng/ml) of plasma GH levels. In 5 patients there was a poor GH rise after GHRH administration (less than 10 ng/ml). Overall, the mean GH response of patients was significantly lower than that of normal girls. Five out of 7 patients with a 45 X,O karyotype had a reduced GH rise after GHRH, while all patients with non X,O karyotype (mosaicism and/or 46 X,iX) had a normal GH response to GHRH. Although the cause of short stature in patients with Turner's syndrome is most likely multifactorial, a reduced pituitary GH reserve, as documented by the reduced GH response to GHRH in some of our patients, may contribute to the growth impairment in this disorder.     

The use of growth hormone-releasing hormone in the diagnosis and treatment of short stature

We have assessed the role of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) as a diagnostic test in 40 children and young adults with growth hormone deficiency (GHD), principally using the GHRH(1-29)NH2 analogue. Following 200 micrograms GHRH as an acute intravenous bolus, serum GH rose to normal or just subnormal levels in 13 out of 17 children with structural lesions, and in 8 of 14 patients with idiopathic GHD or panhypopituitarism. Of 9 children (mean age 12 years) with GHD following treatment with cranial irradiation for nonendocrine tumours, all responded acutely to GHRH. 12- and 24-hour infusions with GHRH(1-29)NH2, and 1- and 2-week treatments with twice-daily subcutaneous GHRH(1-29)NH2, showed persistent stimulation of GH release. It is concluded that many children with GHD of diverse aetiology will respond both acutely and chronically to treatment with GHRH.     

Growth response to recombinant human growth hormone (GH) in children with idiopathic growth retardation by level of maximum GH peak during GH stimulation tests

Due to their lack of reproducibility, it is unlikely that GH stimulation tests can provide reliable diagnostic information to distinguish partial isolated GH deficiency (GHD) from idiopathic short stature (ISS). We hypothesized that the classical distinction between these groups, essentially based on stimulatory GH peaks, is artificial and that, as a consequence, the average response to GH treatment will not be different between them. The hypothesized lack of prognostic validity of stimulatory GH peaks was studied in 435 prepubertal children with nonorganic growth retardation. Children were categorized as 'severe GHD', 'partial GHD' or 'ISS', if the maximum rise in their serum GH during two GH stimulation tests was 0--10 mU/l, 10--20 mU/l, or >20 mU/l, respectively. Children with 'partial GHD' had short-term (1- and 2-year) and long-term (till final adult height) growth responses similar to those of children with ISS, significantly lower than the response seen in children with 'severe GHD'. In children with stimulatory GH peaks >10 mU/l, including those currently considered partially GH deficient, the maximum GH peak was not a significant determinant of growth response in the short or the long term. In conclusion, 'partial GHD' is ill defined and cannot be distinguished from ISS based on the currently applied auxological or GH stimulation test criteria alone. More research is required for better identification of (all) children who will respond to GH treatment, whether or not GH deficient.     

Similar clinical features among patients with severe adult growth hormone deficiency diagnosed with insulin tolerance test or arginine or glucagon stimulation tests

ObjectiveTo determine whether insulin tolerance tests (ITTs), arginine stimulation tests (ASTs), and glucagon stimulation tests (GST) identify patients who have similar clinical features of growth hormone (GH) deficiency when a diagnostic GH threshold of 3 μg/L is used.MethodsData were obtained from the KIMS database (Pfizer International Metabolic Database). Comparisons were made between patients who underwent ITT, AST, or GST for GH peak, body mass index, lipids, waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, and quality of life.ResultsA total of 5453 tests were available from 4867 patients registered in the database (ITT = 3111, AST To purchase reprints of this article, please visit: www.aace.com/reprints. Copyright © 2012 AACE = 1390, GST = 952). Significant (P < .001) intraindividual correlations were observed between the GH peaks for ITT vs AST (r = 0.655), ITT vs GST (r = 0.445), and AST vs GST (r = 0.632). GH peaks in response to all tests were negatively correlated to the number of additional pituitary hormone deficiencies and positively correlated to the insulinlike growth factor 1 standard deviation score. Body mass index had a negative influence on all 3 tests. Most clinical variables did not differ between the groups when comparing GH-deficient patients according to the diagnostic test used. The only exceptions that showed any difference were body mass index (slightly higher in the AST and GST groups), triglyceride levels (increased in the GST group), and insulinlike growth factor 1 (standard deviation score) (lower in the ITT and AST groups than in the GST group). Waist circumference was greater and quality of life was worse in the GST group than in the other groups.ConclusionsThe ITT, AST, and GST produce similar GH peaks, are influenced by similar clinical factors, and identify patients with similar features of GH deficiency at a diagnostic threshold of 3 μg/L. (Endocr Pract. 2012;18:325-334)     

Lower 24-hour growth hormone levels in type I diabetics responding to thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH).

The aim of the study was the evaluation of growth hormone secretion under physiologic conditions in two groups of type I diabetics: responding and nonresponding to TRH stimulation. Both groups matched for age and metabolic control of diabetes were studied during 24-hours and after GHRH stimulation. The whole diabetic group (n = 18) showed circadian rhythm of GH secretion with mesor value of 4.03 micrograms/l. TRH-responders had lower mesor GH value than TRH-nonresponders: 3.53 vs. 5.32, p < 0.05. GH response to GHRH was almost identical in both groups. C-peptide level was lower in TRH-responders: 0.16 vs. 0.56 microgram/l, p < 0.05. No correlation was found between growth hormone response and HbA1 and C-peptide levels. It is concluded that type I diabetics responding to TRH stimulation are characterized by lower mean 24-hour GH levels and lower C-peptide values.     

Recruiting of somatotroph cells after combined somatostatin, GHRH and growth hormone (GH) secretagogue stimulation in a study of pituitary GH reserve in prepuberal female rats

Diagnostic confirmation of growth hormone (GH) deficiency in children and adults is based on stimulation tests designed to assess the pituitary reserve by measuring the amount of GH released into the bloodstream; however, the results obtained by this means cannot provide any direct indication of the amount of GH actually produced by pituitary somatotroph cells. The present paper sought to test the hypothesis that release of GH following administration of specific stimuli does not accurately reflect the somatotroph cell response, and that the amount of GH released into the bloodstream may often be greater or smaller than the amount synthesized. GH release and changes in the proportion of somatotroph cells were charted in prepuberal female Wistar rats, following administration of several different GH stimuli: GHRH (1 microg/kg), GHRP-6 (1 microg/kg), GHRELIN (1 microg/kg) and combined GHRH-based treatments, with or without SRIH pretreatment (1 microg/kg) 90 minutes earlier. Peak serum GH values were recorded 15 minutes after administration of GHRH+GHRELIN and GHRH+GHRP-6; maximum stimulation in terms of an increased proportion of somatotroph cells occurred 15 minutes after combined adminstration of GHRH + GHRELIN. SRIH pretreatment (- 90 min) inhibited GH release, with a subsequent "escape" and lack of response to stimulation which lasted at least 30 minutes except following administration of GHRH. However, combined administration of GHRH+GHRELIN maintained stimulation of the somatotroph cell population. In conclusion, the results suggest that the enhanced GH release prompted by stimulation tests used to diagnose GH deficiency in prepuberal female rats does not fully reflect somatroph cell dynamics, and that not all the GH produced and stored by somatotroph cells is released into the bloodstream.     

Ectopic growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) syndrome in a case with multiple endocrine neoplasia type I

A 36-yr-old man with multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN) type I had an ectopic growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) syndrome due to a GHRH-secreting pancreatic tumor. The immunoreactive (IR)-GHRH concentration in his plasma ranged from 161 to 400 pg/ml (299 +/- 61 pg/ml, mean +/- SD; normal, 10.4 +/- 4.1 pg/ml), and a significant correlation was found between his plasma IR-GHRH and GH (r = 0.622, p less than 0.02). After removal of the pancreatic tumor, the high plasma GH concentration returned to nearly the normal range (42.2 +/- 31.3 to 9.6 +/- 3.8 ng/ml). These changes paralleled the normalization of his plasma IR-GHRH (16.1 +/- 3.8 pg/ml) and some of his symptoms related to acromegaly improved. However, plasma GH (7.7 +/- 1.3 ng/ml) and IGF-I (591 +/- 22 ng/ml) concentrations were high at 12 months after surgery, suggesting adenomatous changes in the pituitary somatotrophs. Before surgery, exogenous GHRH induced a marked increase in plasma GH, and somatostatin and its agonist (SMS201-995) completely suppressed GH secretion, but not IR-GHRH release. No pulsatile secretion of either IR-GHRH or GH was observed during sleep. An apparent increase in the plasma GH concentration was observed in response to administration of TRH, glucose, arginine or insulin, while plasma IR-GHRH did not show any fluctuation. However, these responses of plasma GH were reduced or no longer observed one month and one year after surgery. These results indicate that 1) a moderate increase in circulating GHRH due to ectopic secretion from a pancreatic tumor stimulated GH secretion resulting in acromegaly, and evoked GH responses to various provocative tests indistinguishable from those in patients with classical acromegaly, and 2) the ectopic secretion of GHRH may play an etiological role in the pituitary lesion of this patient with MEN type I.     

Plasma growth hormone response to synthetic GH-RH1-44 in 52 children and adults with growth hormone deficiency of various etiologies

52 patients (42 children and 10 adults) with growth hormone deficiency (GHD), grouped into four diagnostic categories, and 6 children with constitutional short stature who served as controls were tested for plasma GH response to synthetic GH-RH1-44 given in an intravenous bolus. The response was classified into three degrees according to the magnitude of the maximal rise: Good, greater than 9 ng/ml; Partial, 3.1-9.0 ng/ml; None, less than or equal to 3 ng/ml. Among the GHD patients the highest response was observed in patients with partial growth hormone deficiency (PGHD), and 60% of the children with isolated GH deficiency (IGHD) showed an increase in plasma GH levels. Nevertheless, the response of the GHD patients was lower than that in the control group. In the children and adolescents with PGHD and IGHD the response was not age related. Among those with multiple pituitary hormone deficiencies-idiopathic (MPHD-ID) there was no response in the adolescents although a hypothalamic disorder had been documented by other tests. Among those with MPHD-organic (MPHD-ORG) the GH-RH stimulated GH secretion in the patients with glioma, who had received only irradiation treatment, and in the youngest of the patients with craniopharyngioma. Of the 10 young adults tested none showed a good response. It is concluded that GH-RH is useful in differentiating between GH deficiency of hypothalamic origin and that of pituitary origin, and in selecting those patients who might benefit from long-term treatment with GH-RH in the future.     

Chronic growth hormone administration does not suppress endogenous growth hormone secretion in patients with neurosecretory growth hormone dysfunction.

Short children who respond normally to growth hormone (GH) stimulation, but have a subnormal spontaneous secretion of GH (neurosecretory GH dysfunction, NSD) are treated with exogenous GH which might suppress their endogenous GH secretion. The effect of chronic administration of GH (8-24 months) on plasma GH responses to GHRH, clonidine and spontaneous GH secretion were studied in 17 NSD patients. The diagnosis of NSD was based on a normal GH response to clonidine (greater than 10 micrograms/l) and an integrated concentration of (IC-GH) GH less than 3.2 micrograms/l. The GH dose used in this study was 0.25 IU/kg three times a week in 10 patients and 0.05 IU/kg daily in 7 patients. Insulin-like growth factor I levels (nmol) increased significantly on therapy from 9.3 +/- 3.8 to 24.4 +/- 22.4 (p less than 0.001). The GH response (microgram/l) to GHRH was 20.4 +/- 5.5 before treatment and 22.4 +/- 6.2 on GH. Peak GH after clonidine was 22.4 +/- 8.9 and 22.8 +/- 8.1, respectively. There was no significant decrease in the number of GH spontaneous peaks (1.8 +/- 0.7 vs. 2.0 +/- 0.7, respectively) or in the area under the curve. A subcutaneous GH bolus of 0.25 IU/kg in 4 patients resulted in a GH peak of 55-82 micrograms/l at 3-5 h and a gradual return to basal levels at 15-20 h after GH administration. The first spontaneous GH peak appeared 26-28 h after GH injection, peak amplitude was 10-15 micrograms/l.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Growth hormone-releasing hormone and somatostatin in normal and tumoral human pituitaries.

In order to further understand the role of endogenous pituitary neuropeptides in pituitary hormonal content and secretion, GHRH, SRIH and GH contents were quantified in GH adenomas obtained from acromegalic patients with plasma GH levels either high (greater than 5 micrograms/l, range 11 to 550 micrograms/l, n = 11) or in the normal range (less than 5 micrograms/l, range 1 to 3.3 micrograms/l, n = 4). Values were compared to those found in normal human pituitaries. No relationship was found between GHRH content and plasma GH or between SRIH and GH content when considering together adenomas and normal pituitaries. Results showed that there is a positive relationship between GHRH and GH content: when GHRH content is high, GH content is also high (normal pituitaries and GH adenomas of acromegalic patients with high plasma GH) and when GHRH content is low, GH content is also low (GH adenomas of acromegalic patients with plasma GH in the normal range). Conversely, SRIH content is negatively related to plasma GH levels: when SRIH is present, plasma GH is in the normal range; when SRIH is undetectable, plasma GH is high.     

Induction of growth hormone (GH) mRNA by pulsatile GH-releasing hormone in rats is pattern specific

Growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) is a main inducer of growth hormone (GH) pulses in most species studied to date. There is no information regarding the pattern of GHRH secretion as a regulator of GH gene expression. We investigated the roles of the parameters of exogenous GHRH administration (frequency, amplitude, and total amount) upon induction of pituitary GH mRNA, GH content, and somatic growth in the female rat. Continuous GHRH infusions were ineffective in altering GH mRNA levels, GH stores, or weight gain. Changing GHRH pulse amplitude between 4, 8, and 16 microg/kg at a constant frequency (Q3.0 h) was only moderately effective in augmenting GH mRNA levels, whereas the 8 microg/kg and 16 microg/kg dosages stimulated weight gain by as much as 60%. When given at a 1.5-h frequency, GHRH doubled the amount of GH mRNA, elevated pituitary GH stores, and stimulated body weight gain. In the rat model, pulsatile but not continuous GHRH administration is effective in inducing pituitary GH mRNA and GH content as well as somatic growth. These studies suggest that the greater growth rate, pituitary mRNA levels, and GH stores seen in male compared with female rats are likely mediated, in part, by the endogenous episodic GHRH secretory pattern present in males.