Identification and Characterization of a G Protein-binding Cluster in α7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors

α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) play an important role in synaptic transmission and inflammation. In response to ligands, this receptor channel opens to conduct cations into the cell but desensitizes rapidly. In recent studies we show that α7 nAChRs bind signaling proteins such as heterotrimeric GTP-binding proteins (G proteins). Here, we demonstrate that direct coupling of α7 nAChRs to G proteins enables a downstream calcium signaling response that can persist beyond the expected time course of channel activation. This process depends on a G protein-binding cluster (GPBC) in the M3-M4 loop of the receptor. A mutation of the GPBC in the α7 nAChR (α7_345–348A) abolishes interaction with Gα_q as well as Gβγ while having no effect on receptor synthesis, cell-surface trafficking, or α-bungarotoxin binding. Expression of α7_345–348A, however, did significantly attenuate the α7 nAChR-induced Gα_q calcium signaling response as evidenced by a decrease in PLC-β activation and IP₃R-mediated calcium store release in the presence of the α7 selective agonist choline. Taken together, the data provides new evidence for the existence of a GPBC in nAChRs serving to promote intracellular signaling.     

Stoichiometric Structure-Function Analysis of the Prolactin Receptor Signaling Domain by Receptor Chimeras

The intracellular domain of the prolactin (PRL) receptor (PRLr) is required for PRL-induced signaling and proliferation. To identify and test the functional stoichiometry of those PRLr motifs required for transduction and growth, chimeras consisting of the extracellular domain of either the α or β subunit of human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) receptor (GM-CSFr) and the intracellular domain of the rat PRLr were synthesized. Because the high-affinity binding of GM-CSF results from the specific pairing of one α- and one β-GM-CSFr, use of GM-CSFr/PRLr chimera enabled targeted dimerization of the PRLr intracellular domain. To that end, the extracellular domains of the α- and β-GM-CSFr were conjugated to one of the following mutations: (i) PRLr C-terminal truncations, termed α278, α294, α300, α322, or β322; (ii) PRLr tyrosine replacements, termed Y309F, Y382F, or Y309+382F; or, (iii) PRLr wild-type short, intermediate, or long isoforms. These chimeras were cotransfected into the cytokine-responsive Ba/F3 line, and their expression was confirmed by ligand binding and Northern and Western blot analyses. Data from these studies revealed that heterodimeric complexes of the wild type with C-terminal truncation mutants of the PRLr intracellular domain were incapable of ligand-induced signaling or proliferation. Replacement of any single tyrosine residue (Y309F or Y382F) in the dimerized PRLr complex resulted in a moderate reduction of receptor-associated Jak2 activation and proliferation. In contrast, trans replacement of these residues (i.e., αY309F and βY382F) markedly reduced ligand-driven Jak2 activation and proliferation, while cis replacement of both tyrosine residues in a single intracellular domain (i.e., αY309+382F) produced an inactive signaling complex. Analysis of these GM-CSFr–PRLr complexes revealed equivalent levels of Jak2 in association with the mutant receptor chains, suggesting that the tyrosine residues at 309 and 382 do not contribute to Jak association, but instead to its activation. Heterodimeric pairings of the intracellular domains from the known PRLr receptor isoforms (short-intermediate, short-long, and intermediate-long) also yielded inactive receptor complexes. These data demonstrate that the tyrosine residues at 309 and 382, as well as additional residues within the C terminus of the dimerized PRLr complex, contribute to PRL-driven signaling and proliferation. Furthermore, these findings indicate a functional requirement for the pairing of Y309 and Y382 in trans within the dimerized receptor complex.     

Assembly and Function of the Regulator of G protein Signaling 14 (RGS14)·H-Ras Signaling Complex in Live Cells Are Regulated by Gαi1 and Gαi-linked G Protein-coupled Receptors

Regulator of G protein signaling 14 (RGS14) is a multifunctional scaffolding protein that integrates heterotrimeric G protein and H-Ras signaling pathways. RGS14 possesses an RGS domain that binds active Gα_i/o-GTP subunits to promote GTP hydrolysis and a G protein regulatory (GPR) motif that selectively binds inactive Gα_i1/3-GDP subunits to form a stable heterodimer at cellular membranes. RGS14 also contains two tandem Ras/Rap binding domains (RBDs) that bind H-Ras. Here we show that RGS14 preferentially binds activated H-Ras-GTP in live cells to enhance H-Ras cellular actions and that this interaction is regulated by inactive Gα_i1-GDP and G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) in live cells, we show that RGS14-Luciferase and active H-Ras(G/V)-Venus exhibit a robust BRET signal at the plasma membrane that is markedly enhanced in the presence of inactive Gα_i1-GDP but not active Gα_i1-GTP. Active H-Ras(G/V) interacts with a native RGS14·Gα_i1 complex in brain lysates, and co-expression of RGS14 and Gα_i1 in PC12 cells greatly enhances H-Ras(G/V) stimulatory effects on neurite outgrowth. Stimulation of the Gα_i-linked α_2A-adrenergic receptor induces a conformational change in the Gα_i1·RGS14·H-Ras(G/V) complex that may allow subsequent regulation of the complex by other binding partners. Together, these findings indicate that inactive Gα_i1-GDP enhances the affinity of RGS14 for H-Ras-GTP in live cells, resulting in a ternary signaling complex that is further regulated by GPCRs.     

Isoproterenol Acts as a Biased Agonist of the Alpha-1A-Adrenoceptor that Selectively Activates the MAPK/ERK Pathway

The α_1A-AR is thought to couple predominantly to the Gα_q/PLC pathway and lead to phosphoinositide hydrolysis and calcium mobilization, although certain agonists acting at this receptor have been reported to trigger activation of arachidonic acid formation and MAPK pathways. For several G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) agonists can manifest a bias for activation of particular effector signaling output, i.e. not all agonists of a given GPCR generate responses through utilization of the same signaling cascade(s). Previous work with Gα_q coupling-defective variants of α_1A-AR, as well as a combination of Ca²⁺ channel blockers, uncovered cross-talk between α_1A-AR and β₂-AR that leads to potentiation of a Gα_q-independent signaling cascade in response to α_1A-AR activation. We hypothesized that molecules exist that act as biased agonists to selectively activate this pathway. In this report, isoproterenol (Iso), typically viewed as β-AR-selective agonist, was examined with respect to activation of α_1A-AR. α_1A-AR selective antagonists were used to specifically block Iso evoked signaling in different cellular backgrounds and confirm its action at α_1A-AR. Iso induced signaling at α_1A-AR was further interrogated by probing steps along the Gα_q /PLC, Gα_s and MAPK/ERK pathways. In HEK-293/EBNA cells transiently transduced with α_1A-AR, and CHO_α_1A-AR stable cells, Iso evoked low potency ERK activity as well as Ca²⁺ mobilization that could be blocked by α_1A-AR selective antagonists. The kinetics of Iso induced Ca²⁺ transients differed from typical Gα_q- mediated Ca²⁺ mobilization, lacking both the fast IP₃R mediated response and the sustained phase of Ca²⁺ re-entry. Moreover, no inositol phosphate (IP) accumulation could be detected in either cell line after stimulation with Iso, but activation was accompanied by receptor internalization. Data are presented that indicate that Iso represents a novel type of α_1A-AR partial agonist with signaling bias toward MAPK/ERK signaling cascade that is likely independent of coupling to Gα_q.     

Cardiac Overexpression of Constitutively Active Galpha q Causes Angiotensin II Type1 Receptor Activation,Leading to Progressive Heart Failure and Ventricular Arrhythmias in Transgenic Mice

Background

Transgenic mice with transient cardiac expression of constitutively active Galpha q (Gα_q-TG) exhibt progressive heart failure and ventricular arrhythmias after the initiating stimulus of transfected constitutively active Gα_q becomes undetectable. However, the mechanisms are still unknown. We examined the effects of chronic administration of olmesartan on heart failure and ventricular arrhythmia in Gα_q-TG mice.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Olmesartan (1 mg/kg/day) or vehicle was chronically administered to Gα_q-TG from 6 to 32 weeks of age, and all experiments were performed in mice at the age of 32 weeks. Chronic olmesartan administration prevented the severe reduction of left ventricular fractional shortening, and inhibited ventricular interstitial fibrosis and ventricular myocyte hypertrophy in Gα_q-TG. Electrocardiogram demonstrated that premature ventricular contraction (PVC) was frequently (more than 20 beats/min) observed in 9 of 10 vehicle-treated Gα_q-TG but in none of 10 olmesartan-treated Gα_q-TG. The collected QT interval and monophasic action potential duration in the left ventricle were significantly shorter in olmesartan-treated Gα_q-TG than in vehicle-treated Gα_q-TG. CTGF, collagen type 1, ANP, BNP, and β-MHC gene expression was increased and olmesartan significantly decreased the expression of these genes in Gα_q-TG mouse ventricles. The expression of canonical transient receptor potential (TRPC) 3 and 6 channel and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) proteins but not angiotensin II type 1 (AT₁) receptor was increased in Gα_q-TG ventricles compared with NTG mouse ventricles. Olmesartan significantly decreased TRPC6 and tended to decrease ACE expressions in Gα_q-TG. Moreover, it increased AT₁ receptor in Gα_q-TG.

Conclusions/Significance

These findings suggest that angiotensin II type 1 receptor activation plays an important role in the development of heart failure and ventricular arrhythmia in Gα_q-TG mouse model of heart failure.     

Cannabinoid receptor interacting protein 1a interacts with myristoylated Gαi N terminus via a unique gapped β-barrel structure

Cannabinoid receptor interacting protein 1a (CRIP1a) modulates CB₁ cannabinoid receptor G-protein coupling in part by altering the selectivity for Gα_i subtype activation, but the molecular basis for this function of CRIP1a is not known. We report herein the first structure of CRIP1a at a resolution of 1.55 Å. CRIP1a exhibits a 10-stranded and antiparallel β-barrel with an interior comprised of conserved hydrophobic residues and loops at the bottom and a short helical cap at the top to exclude solvent. The β-barrel has a gap between strands β8 and β10, which deviates from β-sandwich fatty acid–binding proteins that carry endocannabinoid compounds and the Rho-guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitor predicted by computational threading algorithms. The structural homology search program DALI identified CRIP1a as homologous to a family of lipidated-protein carriers that includes phosphodiesterase 6 delta subunit and Unc119. Comparison with these proteins suggests that CRIP1a may carry two possible types of cargo: either (i) like phosphodiesterase 6 delta subunit, cargo with a farnesyl moiety that enters from the top of the β-barrel to occupy the hydrophobic interior or (ii) like Unc119, cargo with a palmitoyl or a myristoyl moiety that enters from the side where the missing β-strand creates an opening to the hydrophobic pocket. Fluorescence polarization analysis demonstrated CRIP1a binding of an N-terminally myristoylated 9-mer peptide mimicking the Gα_i N terminus. However, CRIP1a could not bind the nonmyristolyated Gα_i peptide or cargo of homologs. Thus, binding of CRIP1a to Gαi proteins represents a novel mechanism to regulate cell signaling initiated by the CB₁ receptor.     

A Chemical Biology Approach Demonstrates G Protein βγ Subunits Are Sufficient to Mediate Directional Neutrophil Chemotaxis

Our laboratory has identified a number of small molecules that bind to G protein βγ subunits (Gβγ) by competing for peptide binding to the Gβγ “hot spot.” M119/Gallein were identified as inhibitors of Gβγ subunit signaling. Here we examine the activity of another molecule identified in this screen, 12155, which we show that in contrast to M119/Gallein had no effect on Gβγ-mediated phospholipase C or phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) γ activation in vitro. Also in direct contrast to M119/Gallein, 12155 caused receptor-independent Ca²⁺ release, and activated other downstream targets of Gβγ including extracellular signal regulated kinase (ERK), protein kinase B (Akt) in HL60 cells differentiated to neutrophils. We show that 12155 releases Gβγ in vitro from Gα_i1β₁γ₂ heterotrimers by causing its dissociation from GαGDP without inducing nucleotide exchange in the Gα subunit. We used this novel probe to examine the hypothesis that Gβγ release is sufficient to direct chemotaxis of neutrophils in the absence of receptor or G protein α subunit activation. 12155 directed chemotaxis of HL60 cells and primary neutrophils in a transwell migration assay with responses similar to those seen for the natural chemotactic peptide n-formyl-Met-Leu-Phe. These data indicate that release of free Gβγ is sufficient to drive directional chemotaxis in a G protein-coupled receptor signaling-independent manner.     

Complex Role of Collybistin and Gephyrin in GABAA Receptor Clustering

Gephyrin and collybistin are key components of GABA_A receptor (GABA_AR) clustering. Nonetheless, resolving the molecular interactions between the plethora of GABA_AR subunits and these clustering proteins is a significant challenge. We report a direct interaction of GABA_AR α2 and α3 subunit intracellular M3–M4 domain (but not α1, α4, α5, α6, β1–3, or γ1–3) with gephyrin. Curiously, GABA_AR α2, but not α3, binds to both gephyrin and collybistin using overlapping sites. The reciprocal binding sites on gephyrin for collybistin and GABA_AR α2 also overlap at the start of the gephyrin E domain. This suggests that although GABA_AR α3 interacts with gephyrin, GABA_AR α2, collybistin, and gephyrin form a trimeric complex. In support of this proposal, tri-hybrid interactions between GABA_AR α2 and collybistin or GABA_AR α2 and gephyrin are strengthened in the presence of gephyrin or collybistin, respectively. Collybistin and gephyrin also compete for binding to GABA_AR α2 in co-immunoprecipitation experiments and co-localize in transfected cells in both intracellular and submembrane aggregates. Interestingly, GABA_AR α2 is capable of “activating ” collybistin isoforms harboring the regulatory SH3 domain, enabling targeting of gephyrin to the submembrane aggregates. The GABA_AR α2-collybistin interaction was disrupted by a pathogenic mutation in the collybistin SH3 domain (p.G55A) that causes X-linked intellectual disability and seizures by disrupting GABA_AR and gephyrin clustering. Because immunohistochemistry in retina revealed a preferential co-localization of collybistin with α2 subunit containing GABA_ARs, but not GlyRs or other GABA_AR subtypes, we propose that the collybistin-gephyrin complex has an intimate role in the clustering of GABA_ARs containing the α2 subunit.     

Gq-coupled Purinergic Receptors Inhibit Insulin-like Growth Factor-I/Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase Pathway-dependent Keratinocyte Migration

Insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) activation of phosphoinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) is an essential pathway for keratinocyte migration that is required for epidermis wound healing. We have previously reported that activation of Gα_(q/11)-coupled-P2Y₂ purinergic receptors by extracellular nucleotides delays keratinocyte wound closure. Here, we report that activation of P2Y₂ receptors by extracellular UTP inhibits the IGF-I–induced p110α-PI3K activation. Using siRNA and pharmacological inhibitors, we demonstrate that the UTP antagonistic effects on PI3K pathway are mediated by Gα_(q/11)—and not G_(i/o)—independently of phospholipase Cβ. Purinergic signaling does not affect the formation of the IGF-I receptor/insulin receptor substrate-I/p85 complex, but blocks the activity of a membrane-targeted active p110α mutant, indicating that UTP acts downstream of PI3K membrane recruitment. UTP was also found to efficiently attenuate, within few minutes, the IGF-I–induced PI3K-controlled translocation of the actin-nucleating protein cortactin to the plasma membrane. This supports the UTP ability to alter later migratory events. Indeed, UTP inhibits keratinocyte spreading and migration promoted by either IGF-I or a membrane-targeted active p110α mutant, in a Gα(q/11)-dependent manner both. These findings provide new insight into the signaling cross-talk between receptor tyrosine kinase and Gα_(q/11)-coupled receptors, which mediate opposite effects on p110α-PI3K activity and keratinocyte migration.     

Regulation of Constitutive Cargo Transport from the trans-Golgi Network to Plasma Membrane by Golgi-localized G Protein βγ Subunits

Observations of Golgi fragmentation upon introduction of G protein βγ (Gβγ) subunits into cells have implicated Gβγ in a pathway controlling the fission at the trans-Golgi network (TGN) of plasma membrane (PM)-destined transport carriers. However, the subcellular location where Gβγ acts to provoke Golgi fragmentation is not known. Additionally, a role for Gβγ in regulating TGN-to-PM transport has not been demonstrated. Here we report that constitutive or inducible targeting of Gβγ to the Golgi, but not other subcellular locations, causes phospholipase C- and protein kinase D-dependent vesiculation of the Golgi in HeLa cells; Golgi-targeted β₁γ₂ also activates protein kinase D. Moreover, the novel Gβγ inhibitor, gallein, and the Gβγ-sequestering protein, GRK2ct, reveal that Gβγ is required for the constitutive PM transport of two model cargo proteins, VSV-G and ss-HRP. Importantly, Golgi-targeted GRK2ct, but not a PM-targeted GRK2ct, also blocks protein transport to the PM. To further support a role for Golgi-localized Gβγ, endogenous Gβ was detected at the Golgi in HeLa cells. These results are the first to establish a role for Golgi-localized Gβγ in regulating protein transport from the TGN to the cell surface.     

The interaction of Gα13 with integrin β1 mediates cell migration by dynamic regulation of RhoA

Heterotrimeric G protein Gα₁₃ is known to transmit G protein–coupled receptor (GPCR) signals leading to activation of RhoA and plays a role in cell migration. The mechanism underlying the role of Gα₁₃ in cell migration, however, remains unclear. Recently we found that Gα₁₃ interacts with the cytoplasmic domain of integrin β₃ subunits in platelets via a conserved ExE motif. Here we show that a similar direct interaction between Gα₁₃ and the cytoplasmic domain of the integrin β₁ subunit plays a critical role in β₁-dependent cell migration. Point mutation of either glutamic acid in the Gα₁₃-binding ⁷⁶⁷EKE motif in β₁ or treatment with a peptide derived from the Gα₁₃-binding sequence of β₁ abolished Gα₁₃–β₁ interaction and inhibited β₁ integrin–dependent cell spreading and migration. We further show that the Gα₁₃-β₁ interaction mediates β₁ integrin–dependent Src activation and transient RhoA inhibition during initial cell adhesion, which is in contrast to the role of Gα₁₃ in mediating GPCR-dependent RhoA activation. These data indicate that Gα₁₃ plays dynamic roles in both stimulating RhoA via a GPCR pathway and inhibiting RhoA via an integrin signaling pathway. This dynamic regulation of RhoA activity is critical for cell migration on β₁ integrin ligands.     

Regulation of the AGS3·Gαi Signaling Complex by a Seven-transmembrane Span Receptor

G-protein signaling modulators (GPSM) play diverse functional roles through their interaction with G-protein subunits. AGS3 (GPSM1) contains four G-protein regulatory motifs (GPR) that directly bind Gα_i free of Gβγ providing an unusual scaffold for the “G-switch” and signaling complexes, but the mechanism by which signals track into this scaffold are not well understood. We report the regulation of the AGS3·Gα_i signaling module by a cell surface, seven-transmembrane receptor. AGS3 and Gα_i1 tagged with Renilla luciferase or yellow fluorescent protein expressed in mammalian cells exhibited saturable, specific bioluminescence resonance energy transfer indicating complex formation in the cell. Activation of α₂-adrenergic receptors or μ-opioid receptors reduced AGS3-RLuc·Gα_i1-YFP energy transfer by over 30%. The agonist-mediated effects were inhibited by pertussis toxin and co-expression of RGS4, but were not altered by Gβγ sequestration with the carboxyl terminus of GRK2. Gα_i-dependent and agonist-sensitive bioluminescence resonance energy transfer was also observed between AGS3 and cell-surface receptors typically coupled to Gα_i and/or Gα_o indicating that AGS3 is part of a larger signaling complex. Upon receptor activation, AGS3 reversibly dissociates from this complex at the cell cortex. Receptor coupling to both Gαβγ and GPR-Gα_i offer additional flexibility for systems to respond and adapt to challenges and orchestrate complex behaviors.     

Drosophila GoLoco-Protein Pins Is a Target of Gαo-mediated G Protein–coupled Receptor Signaling

G protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs) transduce their signals through trimeric G proteins, inducing guanine nucleotide exchange on their Gα-subunits; the resulting Gα-GTP transmits the signal further inside the cell. GoLoco domains present in many proteins play important roles in multiple trimeric G protein–dependent activities, physically binding Gα-subunits of the Gα_i/o class. In most cases GoLoco binds exclusively to the GDP-loaded form of the Gα-subunits. Here we demonstrate that the poly-GoLoco–containing protein Pins of Drosophila can bind to both GDP- and GTP-forms of Drosophila Gα_o. We identify Pins GoLoco domain 1 as necessary and sufficient for this unusual interaction with Gα_o-GTP. We further pinpoint a lysine residue located centrally in this domain as necessary for the interaction. Our studies thus identify Drosophila Pins as a target of Gα_o-mediated GPCR receptor signaling, e.g., in the context of the nervous system development, where Gα_o acts downstream from Frizzled and redundantly with Gα_i to control the asymmetry of cell divisions.     

Interaction of C-Terminal Truncated Human αA-Crystallins with Target Proteins

Background

Significant portion of αA-crystallin in human lenses exists as C-terminal residues cleaved at residues 172, 168, and 162. Chaperone activity, determined with alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) and βL-crystallin as target proteins, was increased in αA_1–172 and decreased in αA_1–168 and αA_1–162. The purpose of this study was to show whether the absence of the C-terminal residues influences protein-protein interactions with target proteins.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Our hypothesis is that the chaperone-target protein binding kinetics, otherwise termed subunit exchange rates, are expected to reflect the changes in chaperone activity. To study this, we have relied on fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) utilizing amine specific and cysteine specific fluorescent probes. The subunit exchange rate (k) for ADH and αA_1–172 was nearly the same as that of ADH and αA-wt, αA_1–168 had lower and αA_1–162 had the lowest k values. When βL-crystallin was used as the target protein, αA_1–172 had slightly higher k value than αA-wt and αA_1–168 and αA_1–162 had lower k values. As expected from earlier studies, the chaperone activity of αA_1–172 was slightly better than that of αA-wt, the chaperone activity of αA_1–168 was similar to that of αA-wt and αA_1–162 had substantially decreased chaperone activity.

Conclusions/Significance

Cleavage of eleven C-terminal residues including Arg-163 and the C-terminal flexible arm significantly affects the interaction with target proteins. The predominantly hydrophilic flexible arm appears to be needed to keep the chaperone-target protein complex soluble.     

Biased Signaling at Chemokine Receptors

The ability of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) to activate selective signaling pathways according to the conformation stabilized by bound ligands (signaling bias) is a challenging concept in the GPCR field. Signaling bias has been documented for several GPCRs, including chemokine receptors. However, most of these studies examined the global signaling bias between G protein- and arrestin-dependent pathways, leaving unaddressed the potential bias between particular G protein subtypes. Here, we investigated the coupling selectivity of chemokine receptors CCR2, CCR5, and CCR7 in response to various ligands with G protein subtypes by using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer biosensors monitoring directly the activation of G proteins. We also compared data obtained with the G protein biosensors with those obtained with other functional readouts, such as β-arrestin-2 recruitment, cAMP accumulation, and calcium mobilization assays. We showed that the binding of chemokines to CCR2, CCR5, and CCR7 activated the three Gα_i subtypes (Gα_i1, Gα_i2, and Gα_i3) and the two Gα_o isoforms (Gα_oa and Gα_ob) with potencies that generally correlate to their binding affinities. In addition, we showed that the binding of chemokines to CCR5 and CCR2 also activated Gα₁₂, but not Gα₁₃. For each receptor, we showed that the relative potency of various agonist chemokines was not identical in all assays, supporting the notion that signaling bias exists at chemokine receptors.     

Molecular Requirements for Ethanol Differential Allosteric Modulation of Glycine Receptors Based on Selective Gβγ Modulation

It is now believed that the allosteric modulation produced by ethanol in glycine receptors (GlyRs) depends on alcohol binding to discrete sites within the protein structure. Thus, the differential ethanol sensitivity of diverse GlyR isoforms and mutants was explained by the presence of specific residues in putative alcohol pockets. Here, we demonstrate that ethanol sensitivity in two ligand-gated ion receptor members, the GlyR adult α₁ and embryonic α₂ subunits, can be modified through selective mutations that rescued or impaired Gβγ modulation. Even though both isoforms were able to physically interact with Gβγ, only the α₁ GlyR was functionally modulated by Gβγ and pharmacological ethanol concentrations. Remarkably, the simultaneous switching of two transmembrane and a single extracellular residue in α₂ GlyRs was enough to generate GlyRs modulated by Gβγ and low ethanol concentrations. Interestingly, although we found that these TM residues were different to those in the alcohol binding site, the extracellular residue was recently implicated in conformational changes important to generate a pre-open-activated state that precedes ion channel gating. Thus, these results support the idea that the differential ethanol sensitivity of these two GlyR isoforms rests on conformational changes in transmembrane and extracellular residues within the ion channel structure rather than in differences in alcohol binding pockets. Our results describe the molecular basis for the differential ethanol sensitivity of two ligand-gated ion receptor members based on selective Gβγ modulation and provide a new mechanistic framework for allosteric modulations of abuse drugs.     

Integrin αIIbβ3: A novel effector of Gα13

Under physiological conditions, circulating platelets are discoid in shape.¹ On these platelets, the fibrinogen receptor (integrin α_IIbβ₃) is in a low-affinity state, unable to bind soluble fibrinogen (Fg). Activation by agonists such as ADP and thrombin leads to a change in the conformation of the integrin α_IIbβ₃ through a process known as inside-out signaling. This enables the integrin to bind soluble Fg, which initiates a cascade of events referred to as outside-in signaling.² Outside-in signaling control processes, such as platelet spreading and clot retraction, by regulating small G-proteins such as RhoA, Rac and cdc42.Key words: platelets, integrin α_IIbβ₃, Galpha13, RhoA, clot retraction, thrombin, fibrinogenThe majority of the physiological platelet agonists (except collagen) induce inside-out signaling by binding to specific G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). A G-protein plays a crucial role in translating the signal from GPCR to downstream effector molecules, ultimately leading to affinity modulation of integrin α_IIbβ₃. Platelets express nine Gα subunits; namely G_q, G_i1, G_i2, G_i3, G_z, G₁₂, G₁₃, G_s and G₁₆. Previous studies have shown that a small G-protein, RhoA, is activated by the G_12/13 family and plays a crucial role in calcium-independent platelet shape change.³ However, RhoA is also activated by α_IIbβ₃ and inhibits platelet spreading to trigger clot retraction.⁴ Recently, in a series of elegant experiments, Gong et al. have described the dynamic regulation of RhoA through a signaling crosstalk between Gα₁₃ and α_IIbβ₃.⁵By generating mice in which the platelets were depleted of Gα₁₃ using siRNA technology, Gong et al. investigated the role of Gα₁₃-mediated signaling on platelet spreading on immobilized Fg.⁵ The confocal images very clearly showed that, in the absence of Gα₁₃, platelets spread poorly on Fg, which was rescued by pretreatment with the Rho-kinase inhibitor Y27632, confirming previous findings that RhoA activated downstream of integrin α_IIbβ₃ inhibits platelet spreading. Interestingly, Gα₁₃-depleted platelets failed to activate c-Src but accelerated RhoA activation. From these observations, the authors infer that Gα₁₃ is important for integrin-mediated c-Src activation and RhoA inhibition, leading to increased cell spreading.⁵Since Gα₁₃ regulates integrin-mediated cell spreading and c-Src activation, Gong et al. examined the interaction of Gα₁₃ with α_IIbβ₃ using co-immunoprecipitation and GST pull-down assays.⁵ They found that the GTP-bound form of Gα₁₃ shows enhanced interaction with the integrin β₃ subunit. This interaction is required for the activation of c-Src and the inhibition of RhoA. However, they found that the inhibition of RhoA is transient. RhoA activation is suppressed for the first 15 min of platelet spreading, after which RhoA is activated. This initial suppression is rescued by blocking Gα₁₃ and β₃ cytoplasmic domain (β3-CD) interaction. Furthermore, they observed that RhoA activation parallels clot retraction.⁵ These findings indicate that Gα₁₃ is a key regulator of platelet spreading and clot retraction phenomena.According to Gong et al., thrombin-induced inside-out signaling through GPCR leads to GTP loading of Gα₁₃ (Fig. 1A). This GTP-bound Gα₁₃ interacts with integrin β3-CD of ligand-bound integrin, thus facilitating c-Src activation, which leads to platelet spreading. Blockade of the interaction between Gα₁₃ and β3-CD or cleavage of β3-CD by calpain results in clot retraction (Fig. 1B).Open in a separate windowFigure 1Schematic representation of the dynamic regulation of RhoA by Gα₁₃ during platelet activation. (A) Activation of platelets by thrombin receptors coupled to Gα₁₃ leads to the activation of RhoA, leading to platelet shape change. (B) The change in the conformation of integrin to a high-affinity form results in fibrinogen binding to α_IIbβ₃. Active Gα13 binds to the cytoplasmic domain of β₃ leading to the activation of c-Src, resulting in platelet spreading. The rise in intracellular calcium activates calpain, which cleaves the β₃ cytoplasmic domain, releasing c-Src, which, resulting in the activation of RhoA, leads to cell retraction. *Denotes GTP-bound active form of G-proteins.Perhaps the most significant and novel finding of the study is the identification of integrin α_IIbβ₃ as an effector of Gα₁₃. The study also convincingly shows that Gα₁₃ bound to integrin regulates RhoA via c-Src. Furthermore, achieving 80% knockdown of Gα₁₃ in an in vivo setting using siRNA represents a technological advancement. Since Gα₁₃ binds to integrin β3-CD in a 1:1 stoichiometry, it appears that only a small population of integrin is regulated by Gα₁₃, as there are far less Gα₁₃ molecules in a single platelet than the number of α_IIbβ₃ molecules. This will require further investigation. Gong et al. also finds that an appreciable amount of Gα₁₃ is associated with β₃ in resting platelets, which requires some explanation.⁵ It is also not clear if Gα₁₃ remains bound to β3-CD or dissociates from the integrin during clot retraction.Overall, this is a paradigm-shifting study that establishes the importance of the dynamic regulation of RhoA by Gα₁₃ in order to achieve efficient platelet spreading and clot retraction.     

Computational Study on the Different Ligands Induced Conformation Change of β2 Adrenergic Receptor-Gs Protein Complex

β₂ adrenergic receptor (β₂AR) regulated many key physiological processes by activation of a heterotrimeric GTP binding protein (Gs protein). This process could be modulated by different types of ligands. But the details about this modulation process were still not depicted. Here, we performed molecular dynamics (MD) simulations on the structures of β₂AR-Gs protein in complex with different types of ligands. The simulation results demonstrated that the agonist BI-167107 could form hydrogen bonds with Ser203^5.42, Ser207^5.46 and Asn293^6.55 more than the inverse agonist ICI 118,551. The different binding modes of ligands further affected the conformation of β₂AR. The energy landscape profiled the energy contour map of the stable and dissociated conformation of Gαs and Gβγ when different types of ligands bound to β₂AR. It also showed the minimum energy pathway about the conformational change of Gαs and Gβγ along the reaction coordinates. By using interactive essential dynamics analysis, we found that Gαs and Gβγ domain of Gs protein had the tendency to separate when the inverse agonist ICI 118,551 bound to β₂AR. The α5-helix had a relatively quick movement with respect to transmembrane segments of β₂AR when the inverse agonist ICI 118,551 bound to β₂AR. Besides, the analysis of the centroid distance of Gαs and Gβγ showed that the Gαs was separated from Gβγ during the MD simulations. Our results not only could provide details about the different types of ligands that induced conformational change of β₂AR and Gs protein, but also supplied more information for different efficacies of drug design of β₂AR.     

Orthosteric Binding of ρ-Da1a,a Natural Peptide of Snake Venom Interacting Selectively with the α1A-Adrenoceptor

ρ-Da1a is a three-finger fold toxin from green mamba venom that is highly selective for the α_1A-adrenoceptor. This toxin has atypical pharmacological properties, including incomplete inhibition of ³H-prazosin or ¹²⁵I-HEAT binding and insurmountable antagonist action. We aimed to clarify its mode of action at the α_1A-adrenoceptor. The affinity (pKi 9.26) and selectivity of ρ-Da1a for the α_1A-adrenoceptor were confirmed by comparing binding to human adrenoceptors expressed in eukaryotic cells. Equilibrium and kinetic binding experiments were used to demonstrate that ρ-Da1a, prazosin and HEAT compete at the α_1A-adrenoceptor. ρ-Da1a did not affect the dissociation kinetics of ³H-prazosin or ¹²⁵I-HEAT, and the IC₅₀ of ρ-Da1a, determined by competition experiments, increased linearly with the concentration of radioligands used, while the residual binding by ρ-Da1a remained stable. The effect of ρ-Da1a on agonist-stimulated Ca²⁺ release was insurmountable in the presence of phenethylamine- or imidazoline-type agonists. Ten mutations in the orthosteric binding pocket of the α_1A-adrenoceptor were evaluated for alterations in ρ-Da1a affinity. The D106^3.32A and the S188^5.42A/S192^5.46A receptor mutations reduced toxin affinity moderately (6 and 7.6 times, respectively), while the F86^2.64A, F288^6.51A and F312^7.39A mutations diminished it dramatically by 18- to 93-fold. In addition, residue F86^2.64 was identified as a key interaction point for ¹²⁵I-HEAT, as the variant F86^2.64A induced a 23-fold reduction in HEAT affinity. Unlike the M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor toxin MT7, ρ-Da1a interacts with the human α_1A-adrenoceptor orthosteric pocket and shares receptor interaction points with antagonist (F86^2.64, F288^6.51 and F312^7.39) and agonist (F288^6.51 and F312^7.39) ligands. Its selectivity for the α_1A-adrenoceptor may result, at least partly, from its interaction with the residue F86^2.64, which appears to be important also for HEAT binding.