Regulation of open complex formation at the Escherichia coli galactose operon promoters. Simultaneous interaction of RNA polymerase, gal repressor and CAP/cAMP.

The regulation of open complex formation at the Escherichia coli galactose operon promoters by galactose repressor and catabolite activator protein/cyclic AMP (CAP/cAMP) was investigated in DNA-binding and kinetic experiments performed in vitro. We found that gal repressor and CAP/cAMP bind to the gal regulatory region independently, resulting in simultaneous occupancy of the two gal operators and the CAP/cAMP binding site. Both CAP/cAMP and gal repressor altered the partitioning of RNA polymerase between the two overlapping gal promoters. Open complexes formed in the absence of added regulatory proteins were partitioned between gal P1 and P2 with occupancies of 25% and 75%, respectively. CAP/cAMP caused open complexes to be formed nearly exclusively at P1 (98% occupancy). gal repressor caused a co-ordinated, but incomplete, switch in promoter partitioning from P1 to P2 in both the absence and presence of CAP/cAMP. We measured the kinetic constants governing open complex formation and decay at the gal promoters in the absence and presence of gal repressor and CAP/cAMP. CAP/cAMP had the largest effect on the kinetics of open complex formation, resulting in a 30-fold increase in the apparent binding constant. We conclude that the regulation of open complex formation at the gal promoters does not result from competition between gal repressor, CAP/cAMP and RNA polymerase for binding at the gal operon regulatory region, but instead results from the interactions of the three proteins during the formation of a nucleoprotein complex on the gal DNA fragment. Finally, we present a kinetic model for the regulation of open complex formation at the gal operon.     

A genomic-scale search for regulatory binding sites in the integration host factor regulon of Escherichia coli K12

We examined general aspects of the DNA-protein interaction between the integration host factor (IHF) global regulator and its regulatory binding sites in the Escherichia coli K12 genome. Two models were developed with distinct weight matrices for the regulatory binding sites recognized by IHF. Using these matrices we performed a genome scale scan and built a set of computationally predicted binding sites for each of the models. The sites found by the model associated with repetitive sequences had a higher score in the sequence to matrix alignment. They were also more rare than the other sites. The sites not associated with repeats rapidly tended to become undistinguishable from the background as statistical stringency was relaxed. We compared our results to the known sites documented in RegulonDB and found new members of the IHF Regulon. The two models exhibit clearly distinct affinity patterns (scores in the sequence to matrix alignments and in the number of regulatory sites), as we vary the stringency of the statistical confidence parameters. We suggest that these differences may play an important role in the dynamics of the network. We concluded that IHF may regulate two genes encoding ATP-dependent RNA helicases. This interaction is not described in RegulonDB, even as a computational prediction. IHF may also regulate RNA modification processes.     

Riboflavin operon in Bacillus subtilis contains additional promoters

Using the methods of molecular cloning permitted to show that riboflavin operon of Bacillus subtilis contains four promoters. Three of them are functionally active in the Bacillus subtilis system. The main promoter of the operon with regulatory region was cloned in plasmid pPL603. Cells containing the constructed plasmid pGM32 are resistant to chloramphenicol. The level of resistance is regulated by concentration of riboflavin (the effector of operon). The following model of rib-operon has been proposed: (Formula: see text).     

Relative roles of the fla/che P(A), P(D-3), and P(sigD) promoters in regulating motility and sigD expression in Bacillus subtilis

Three promoters have been identified as having potentially important regulatory roles in governing expression of the fla/che operon and of sigD, a gene that lies near the 3' end of the operon. Two of these promoters, fla/che P(A) and P(D-3), lie upstream of the >26-kb fla/che operon. The third promoter, P(sigD), lies within the operon, immediately upstream of sigD. fla/che P(A), transcribed by E sigma(A), lies >/=24 kb upstream of sigD and appears to be largely responsible for sigD expression. P(D-3), transcribed by E sigma(D), has been proposed to participate in an autoregulatory positive feedback loop. P(sigD), a minor sigma(A)-dependent promoter, has been implicated as essential for normal expression of the fla/che operon. We tested the proposed functions of these promoters in experiments that utilized strains that bear chromosomal deletions of fla/che P(A), P(D-3), or P(sigD). Our analysis of these strains indicates that fla/che P(A) is absolutely essential for motility, that P(D-3) does not function in positive feedback regulation of sigD expression, and that P(sigD) is not essential for normal fla/che expression. Further, our results suggest that an additional promoter(s) contributes to sigD expression.