共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
Y. Kobayashi H. Ando 《Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research》1988,26(3):186-210
Adopting the cladistic method in comparative embryology, 27 embryonic characters were analyzed to reconstruct the phylogenetic relationships among the lepidopteran and trichopteran suborders, viz., Annulipalpia, Integripalpia, Zeugloptera, Dacnonypha, Exoporia, Monotrysia, and Ditrysia. The resultant cladogram is basically coincident with that proposed by Kristensen . The order Trichoptera and Lepidoptera constitute a monophyletic group on the basis of one synapomorphy, the presence of well developed silk glands in embryos. The Trichoptera are separable from the Lepidoptera by the states of four characters. The Trichoptera, as a whole, are quite homogenous, and embryological data provide no rational ground for the separation of this order into the Annulipalpia and Integripalpia at a subordinal level. On the contrary, the embryonic development of the Lepidoptera becomes divergent from the most primitive condition to a specialized one according to suborders. The Zeugloptera are the sister group of all other Lepidoptera, because they share two apomorphies with the latter. The Dacnonypha are the most primitive next to the Zeugloptera, and have a sister-group relationship with the Exoporia + (Monotrysia + Ditrysia), being held together with the latter by five synapomorphies. Although the Exoporia retain almost as many plesiomorphic characters as the Dacnonypha, they have a sister-group relationship with the Monotrysia + Ditrysia, as inferred on the basis of two synapomorphies. The Monotrysia and Ditrysia have a sistergroup relationship, and are the most advanced groups in the Lepidoptera judging from their shared acquisition of many apomorphic characters. 相似文献
2.
Eleven representatives of the superorder Amphiesmenoptera (Trichoptera + Lepidoptera) were examined for sex chromatin status. Three species represent stenopsychoid, limnephiloid and leptoceroid branches of the Trichoptera; eight species belong to the primitive, so-called nonditrysian Lepidoptera and represent the infra-orders Zeugloptera, Dacnonypha, Exoporia, Incurvariina, Nepticulina and Tischeriina. The female-specific sex chromatin body was found in the interphase somatic nuclei of Tischeria ekebladella (Bjerkander 1795) (Lepidoptera, Tischeriina). The sex chromatin was absent in all investigated Trichoptera species as well as in all representatives of the nonditrysian Lepidoptera except Tischeria ekebladella . The sex chromosome mechanism of Limnephilus lunatus Curtis 1834 (Trichoptera, Limnephilidae) is Z/ZZ. The sex chromosome mechanism of Tischeria ekebladella (Lepidoptera, Tischeriina) is ZW/ZZ including the W chromosome as the largest element in the chromosome set. The data obtained support the hypothesis that the Z/ZZ sex chromosome system, the female heterogamety and the absence of the sex chromatin body in interphase nuclei are ancestral traits in the superorder Amphiesmenoptera. These ancestral characters are probably kept constant in all the Trichoptera and in the most primitive Lepidoptera. The W sex chromosome and the sex chromatin evolved later in the nonditrysian grade of the Lepidoptera. It is proposed that the sex chromatin is a synapomorphy of Tischeriina and Ditrysia. 相似文献
3.
A molecular phylogeny for the oldest (nonditrysian) lineages of extant Lepidoptera,with implications for classification,comparative morphology and life‐history evolution
下载免费PDF全文
![点击此处可从《Systematic Entomology》网站下载免费的PDF全文](/ch/ext_images/free.gif)
JEROME C. REGIER CHARLES MITTER DONALD R. DAVIS ERIK J. VAN NIEUKERKEN JADRANKA ROTA THOMAS J. SIMONSEN KIM T. MITTER AKITO Y. KAWAHARA SHEN‐HORN YEN MICHAEL P. CUMMINGS ANDREAS ZWICK 《Systematic Entomology》2015,40(4):671-704
Within the insect order Lepidoptera (moths and butterflies), the so‐called nonditrysian superfamilies are mostly species‐poor but highly divergent, offering numerous synapomorphies and strong morphological evidence for deep divergences. Uncertainties remain, however, and tests of the widely accepted morphological framework using other evidence are desirable. The goal of this paper is to test previous hypotheses of nonditrysian phylogeny against a data set consisting of 61 nonditrysian species plus 20 representative Ditrysia and eight outgroups (Trichoptera), nearly all sequenced for 19 nuclear genes (up to 14 700 bp total). We compare our results in detail with those from previous studies of nonditrysians, and review the morphological evidence for and against each grouping The major conclusions are as follows. (i) There is very strong support for Lepidoptera minus Micropterigidae and Agathiphagidae, here termed Angiospermivora, but no definitive resolution of the position of Agathiphagidae, although support is strongest for alliance with Micropterigidae, consistent with another recent molecular study. (ii) There is very strong support for Glossata, which excludes Heterobathmiidae, but weak support for relationships among major homoneurous clades. Eriocraniidae diverge first, corroborating the morphological clade Coelolepida, but the morphological clades Myoglossata and Neolepidoptera are never monophyletic in the molecular trees; both are contradicted by strong support for Lophocoronoidea + Hepialoidea, the latter here including Mnesarchaeoidea syn.n. (iii) The surprising grouping of Acanthopteroctetidae + Neopseustidae, although weakly supported here, is consistent with another recent molecular study. (iv) Heteroneura is very strongly supported, as is a basal split of this clade into Nepticuloidea + Eulepidoptera. Relationships within Nepticuloidea accord closely with recent studies based on fewer genes but many more taxa. (v) Eulepidoptera are split into a very strongly supported clade consisting of Tischeriidae + Palaephatidae + Ditrysia, here termed Euheteroneura, and a moderately supported clade uniting Andesianidae with Adeloidea. (vi) Relationships within Adeloidea are strongly resolved and Tridentaformidae fam.n. is described for the heretofore problematic genus Tridentaforma Davis, which is strongly supported in an isolated position within the clade. (vii) Within Euheteroneura, the molecular evidence is conflicting with respect to the sister group to Ditrysia, but strongly supports paraphyly of Palaephatidae. We decline to change the classification, however, because of strong morphological evidence supporting palaephatid monophyly. (viii) We review the life histories and larval feeding habits of all nonditrysian families and assess the implications of our results for hypotheses about early lepidopteran phytophagy. The first host record for Neopseustidae, which needs confirmation, suggests that larvae of this family may be parasitoids. This published work has been registered in ZooBank: http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C17BB79B‐EF8F‐4925‐AFA0‐2FEF8AC32876 . 相似文献
4.
《International Journal of Insect Morphology and Embryology》1989,18(5-6):261-274
The eggshells of Hepialus hecta, Wiseana umbraculata (Hepialidae) and of Mnesarchaea fusilella (Mnesarchaeidae) (Lepidoptera, Exoporia) were studied by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission (TEM) electron microscopy. All 3 species show a very similar surface sculpture of the micropylar region which, however, is very different from the eggs of the Ditrysia. The micropylar plate is large and oval. There are only 2 or 3 micropylar openings. In the hepialid moths, the surface of the egg's main body is characterized by spherical protuberances. The radial fine structure of the eggshells of all 3 species as well as of alcohol-stored eggs of Mnesarchaea acuta (Mnesarchaeidae) is basically identical to the eggshell of Korscheltellus lupulinus (Hepialidae). The chorion consists of only one layer, which, in the hepialid species, shows a crystalline-like fine structure. The vitelline envelope is composed of a thin, laminated, outer layer (V-2) and a thick, rigid, inner layer (V-1) that is traversed by large numbers of canals. This kind of eggshell architecture is distinctively different from that of the ditrysian Lepidoptera. 相似文献
5.
6.
Frank Hünefeld Christine Mißbach Rolf Georg Beutel 《Arthropod Structure & Development》2012,41(4):361-371
In the present article homology issues, character evolution and phylogenetic implications related to the female postabdomen of the holometabolan insects are discussed, based on an earlier analysis of a comprehensive morphological data set. Hymenoptera, the sistergroup of the remaining Holometabola, are the only group where the females have retained a fully developed primary ovipositor of the lepismatid type. There are no characters of the female abdomen supporting a clade Coleopterida + Neuropterida. The invagination of the terminal segments is an autapomorphy of Coleoptera. The ovipositor is substantially modified in Raphidioptera and distinctly reduced in Megaloptera and Neuroptera. The entire female abdomen is extremely simplified in Strepsiptera. The postabdomen is tapering posteriorly in Mecopterida and retractile in a telescopic manner (oviscapt). The paired ventral sclerites of segments VIII and IX are preserved, but valvifers and valvulae are not distinguishable. In Amphiesmenoptera sclerotizations derived from the ventral appendages VIII are fused ventromedially, forming a solid plate, and the appendages IX are reduced. The terminal segments are fused and form a terminal unit which bears the genital opening subapically. The presence of two pairs of apophyses and the related protraction of the terminal unit by muscle force are additional autapomorphies, as is the fusion of the rectum with the posterior part of the genital chamber (cloaca). Antliophora are supported by the presence of a transverse muscle between the ventral sclerites of segment VIII. Secondary egg laying tubes have evolved independently within Boreidae (absent in Caurinus) and in Tipulomorpha. The loss of two muscle associated with the genital chamber are likely autapomorphies of Diptera. The secondary loss of the telescopic retractability of the postabdomen is one of many autapomorphies of Siphonaptera. 相似文献
7.
《International Journal of Insect Morphology and Embryology》1990,19(5-6):269-276
The morphology of the male genital organs and sperm ultrastructure were studied by light and transmission electron microscopy in adult males of two species of the genus Micropterix (Micropterigidae; Zeugloptera; Lepidoptera). The results are compared with findings from other primitive Lepidoptera and Trichoptera, and evaluated from a phylogenetic viewpoint. Both Micropterix species examined agree with regard to essential characters of the male genital organs. The paired testes are separate and show no internal compartmentalization. The male genital organs contain only mature nucleate (eupyrene) spermatozoa. Anucleate (apyrene) spermatozoa characteristically found in all other Lepidoptera were not observed. The eupyrene spermatozoa are filiform, measure 100 μm in length, and contain an elongated nucleus, 2 mitochondrial derivatives without paracrystalline materials, and a 9 + 2 axoneme without accessory tubules; the nucleus extends for almost the entire length of the spermatozoa. The absence of apyrene spermatozoa in Micropterix is in contrast to their presence in another species of the same family. 相似文献
8.
The micropterygid moth Neomicropteryx nipponensis belongs to the most primitive suborder Zeugloptera of the Lepidoptera. During embryogenesis the small circular germ disk formed on the ventral egg surface invaginates deeply into the yolk. It finally separates from the egg periphery or rudimentary serosa, and becomes a sac-shaped germ rudiment. Its anterior part later develops into the germ band, while its posterior part is the future amnion. Just before revolution of the embryo, the embryo assumes a completely superficial position beneath the yolk. Neither amnion nor serosa rupture during revolution; by completion of dorsal closure they have been incorporated into the yolk to form the secondary dorsal organ. The formation of the germ rudiment and embryonic membranes in N. nipponensis resembles those of swift moths, Endoclyta (suborder Monotrysia) and of the caddisflies, Stenopsyche (Trichoptera), but differs from those of ditrysian Lepidoptera. The secondary dorsal organ has never been found in any other lepidopteran embryos; however, it is formed in N. nipponensis and in the Trichoptera. The results of the present study strongly support the general phylogenetic views that the Zeugloptera have a close affinity to the Trichoptera. 相似文献
9.
10.
从12目具翅昆虫中选出16个代表种,对其后足基骨片的形态特征在不同类群中的衍变进行分析比较,据此构建反映下列初步进化关系的系统树:[Ephemeroptera+(Odonata+Neoptera)]+[Plecoptera+(Megaloptera+Neuroptera+(Orthoptera+(Hemiptera+(... 相似文献
11.
12.
13.
Phylogenetic relationships among the holometabolous insect orders were inferred from cladistic analysis of nucleotide sequences of 18S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) (85 exemplars) and 28S rDNA (52 exemplars) and morphological characters. Exemplar outgroup taxa were Collembola (1 sequence), Archaeognatha (1), Ephemerida (1), Odonata (2), Plecoptera (2), Blattodea (1), Mantodea (1), Dermaptera (1), Orthoptera (1), Phasmatodea (1), Embioptera (1), Psocoptera (1), Phthiraptera (1), Hemiptera (4), and Thysanoptera (1). Exemplar ingroup taxa were Coleoptera: Archostemata (1), Adephaga (2), and Polyphaga (7); Megaloptera (1); Raphidioptera (1); Neuroptera (sensu stricto = Planipennia): Mantispoidea (2), Hemerobioidea (2), and Myrmeleontoidea (2); Hymenoptera: Symphyta (4) and Apocrita (19); Trichoptera: Hydropsychoidea (1) and Limnephiloidea (2); Lepidoptera: Ditrysia (3); Siphonaptera: Pulicoidea (1) and Ceratophylloidea (2); Mecoptera: Meropeidae (1), Boreidae (1), Panorpidae (1), and Bittacidae (2); Diptera: Nematocera (1), Brachycera (2), and Cyclorrhapha (1); and Strepsiptera: Corioxenidae (1), Myrmecolacidae (1), Elenchidae (1), and Stylopidae (3). We analyzed approximately 1 kilobase of 18S rDNA, starting 398 nucleotides downstream of the 5' end, and approximately 400 bp of 28S rDNA in expansion segment D3. Multiple alignment of the 18S and 28S sequences resulted in 1,116 nucleotide positions with 24 insert regions and 398 positions with 14 insert regions, respectively. All Strepsiptera and Neuroptera have large insert regions in 18S and 28S. The secondary structure of 18S insert 23 is composed of long stems that are GC rich in the basal Strepsiptera and AT rich in the more derived Strepsiptera. A matrix of 176 morphological characters was analyzed for holometabolous orders. Incongruence length difference tests indicate that the 28S + morphological data sets are incongruent but that 28S + 18S, 18S + morphology, and 28S + 18S + morphology fail to reject the hypothesis of congruence. Phylogenetic trees were generated by parsimony analysis, and clade robustness was evaluated by branch length, Bremer support, percentage of extra steps required to force paraphyly, and sensitivity analysis using the following parameters: gap weights, morphological character weights, methods of data set combination, removal of key taxa, and alignment region. The following are monophyletic under most or all combinations of parameter values: Holometabola, Polyphaga, Megaloptera + Raphidioptera, Neuroptera, Hymenoptera, Trichoptera, Lepidoptera, Amphiesmenoptera (Trichoptera + Lepidoptera), Siphonaptera, Siphonaptera + Mecoptera, Strepsiptera, Diptera, and Strepsiptera + Diptera (Halteria). Antliophora (Mecoptera + Diptera + Siphonaptera + Strepsiptera), Mecopterida (Antliophora + Amphiesmenoptera), and Hymenoptera + Mecopterida are supported in the majority of total evidence analyses. Mecoptera may be paraphyletic because Boreus is often placed as sister group to the fleas; hence, Siphonaptera may be subordinate within Mecoptera. The 18S sequences for Priacma (Coleoptera: Archostemata), Colpocaccus (Coleoptera: Adephaga), Agulla (Raphidioptera), and Corydalus (Megaloptera) are nearly identical, and Neuropterida are monophyletic only when those two beetle sequences are removed from the analysis. Coleoptera are therefore paraphyletic under almost all combinations of parameter values. Halteria and Amphiesmenoptera have high Bremer support values and long branch lengths. The data do not support placement of Strepsiptera outside of Holometabola nor as sister group to Coleoptera. We reject the notion that the monophyly of Halteria is due to long branch attraction because Strepsiptera and Diptera do not have the longest branches and there is phylogenetic congruence between molecules, across the entire parameter space, and between morphological and molecular data. 相似文献
14.
J.S. Dugdale 《New Zealand journal of zoology.》2013,40(2):277-281
Abstract The Monotrysian superfamily Incurvarioidea (Lepidoptera) is now known to be present inNew Zealand. A mummified partly decayed male, parasitised pupae, larval head capsules, and characteristic cocoons are associated with long (1500–2000 mm) meandering cortical scribble-like mines in sapling Weinmannia, Nothofagus and Myrsine. The fragments and larval biology display features of Prodoxidae, but cannot be assigned to a genus. Wing pattern, some forewing venation, pupal structure, male genitalia and some female ovipositor structures, larval head capsule and pronotum, and details of the pupal cell and larval mine are described and illustrated. 相似文献
15.
Megaloptera are a basal holometabolous insect order with larvae exclusively predacious and aquatic. The evolutionary history of Megaloptera attracts great interest because of its antiquity and important systematic status in Holometabola. However, due to the difficulties identifying morphological apomorphies for the group, controversial hypotheses on the monophyly and higher phylogeny of Megaloptera have been proposed. Herein, we describe the complete mitochondrial (mt) genome of a fishfly species, Neochauliodes punctatolosus Liu & Yang, 2006, representing the first mt genome of the subfamily Chauliodinae. A phylogenomic analysis was carried out based on the mt genomic sequences of 13 mt protein-coding genes (PCGs) and two rRNA genes of nine Neuropterida species, comprising all three orders of Neuropterida and all families and subfamilies of Megaloptera. Both maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference analyses highly support the monophyly of Megaloptera, which was recovered as the sister of Neuroptera. Within Megaloptera, the sister relationship between Corydalinae and Chauliodinae was corroborated. The divergence time estimation suggests that stem lineage of Neuropterida and Coleoptera separated in the Early Permian. The interordinal divergence within Neuropterida might have occurred in the Late Permian. 相似文献
16.
17.
Abstract Segment 9 of male Raphidioptera, comprising tergite, sternite, gonocoxites, gonostyli and gonapophyses, is a benchmark for homologies in the male and female terminalia of the three Neuropterida orders Raphidioptera, Megaloptera and Neuroptera. The segments relating to genitalia are 9, 10 and 11 in males and 7, 8 and 9 in females. Results from holomorphological and recent molecular cladistic analyses of Neuropterida agree in supporting the sister‐group relationships between: (1) the Raphidioptera and the clade Megaloptera + Neuroptera, and (2) the suborder Nevrorthiformia and all other Neuroptera. The main discrepancy between the results of these studies is the nonmonophyly of the suborder Hemerobiiformia in the molecular analysis. The monophyly of the Megaloptera (which has been repeatedly questioned) is further corroborated by a hitherto overlooked ground pattern autapomorphy: the presence of eversible sacs within the complex of the fused gonocoxites 11 in Corydalidae and Sialidae. The recently discovered paired complex of gonocoxites 10 (parameres) in Nipponeurorthus (Nevrorthidae) indicates that the curious apex of sternite 9 of Nevrorthus and Austroneurorthus is the amalgamation of the sclerites of gonocoxites 10 with sternite 9, interpreted as synapomorphic. In the molecular study, the Nevrorthidae, Sisyridae and Osmylidae branch off in consecutive splitting events, a result that is supported by the analysis of male genital sclerites reported here. Extraordinary parallel apomorphies (e.g. excessive enlargement and modification of gonocoxites 10 ending in a thread‐like ‘penisfilum’) in derived representatives of Coniopterygidae, Berothidae, Rhachiberothidae and Mantispidae corroborate the dilarid clade of the morphological analysis and leads us to hypothesize a sister‐group relationship of the Coniopterygidae with the dilarid clade. A re‐interpretation of the tignum of Chrysopidae as gonocoxites 11 means that the structure previously called the gonarcus represents the fused gonocoxites 9. In Hemerobiidae, the corresponding sclerite is consequently also homologized as fused gonocoxites 9. The enlargement of the lateral wings of the gonocoxites in both families is interpreted as a synapomorphy. Excessive enlargement of gonostyli 11 in the Polystoechotid clade and Myrmeleontiformia supports a sister‐group relationship of these two clades. The occurrence of certain serial homologues of female genitalia structures (gonocoxites and gonapophyses), such as the digitiform processus together with the flat appendices in segment 8 of certain Myrmeleontidae, or the wart‐like processus together with the flat circular sclerites in segment 7 of certain Berothidae, as well as the presence of gonocoxites 8 as pseudosternites in certain Nemopteridae and Coniopterygidae, are probably character reversals. The digitiform processus of tergite 9 (pseudogonocoxites) in Rhachiberothidae and Austroberothella (Berothidae) are either independently developed acquisitions with a function in oviposition, or are homologous sclerites, possibly of epipleurite origin. 相似文献
18.
大口涡虫属所有物种均为雌雄同体,具一套交配器官。作者于2015年在广东省的两处淡水环境,首次发现2个具有双雄性交配器官的大口涡虫(Macrostomum sp.)标本。通过对活体、整装片、连续组织切片的显微镜观测,发现2只标本的两套交配器官呈左右排列;每套交配器官具备完整的假储精囊、储精囊、颗粒囊与交配刺;假储精囊与储精囊内具有精子;雄孔分别为1个与2个;交配刺的结构与中国已经记录的物种都不相同。本研究对其做了较为详细的描述,并初步探讨了大口涡虫多交配器官发生的原因。 相似文献
19.
《International Journal of Insect Morphology and Embryology》1988,17(3):197-205
The female reproductive system of the humpbacked fly Megaselia scalaris Loew (Diptera : Phoridae) was examined in whole mount preparations and serial sections. The system includes 2 ovaries, paired lateral oviducts, a common oviduct, and a genital chamber, opening externally through a gonopore, anteriad and ventrad to the anus. The ducts of the 2 accessory glands open independently into the dorsal region of the genital chamber. The terminal duct of a 2-armed spermatheca joins the right posterior and ventral wall of the genital chamber, immediately inside the gonopore. Passing dorally, the spermathecal duct lies immediately ventral to the duct of the right accessory gland. A short distance posteriad, it divides into two branches, each supplying an arm of the spermatheca. The genital chamber extends both anteriorly and posteriorly from its junction with the common oviduct, creating anterior and posterior compartments. In the right lateral wall of the genital chamber, a distinctive loop-shaped thickening (plate) resembles a darkened thread when it is observed through the integument. Features likely to have taxonomic utility include the posterior and ventral location of the terminal portion of the spermathecal duct; and the asymmetrically arranged, loop-shaped plate. 相似文献
20.
The sperm pumps of Strepsiptera and Antliophora (Hexapoda) 总被引:4,自引:0,他引:4
F. Hünefeld R. G. Beutel 《Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research》2005,43(4):297-306
Male genital structures of representatives of Strepsiptera, Siphonaptera and Diptera are described in detail, with special emphasis on sperm pumps. The parts involved in the apparatus are evaluated with respect to their homology. Functional interpretations are presented based on the morphological observations. The phylogenetic significance of characters related to the male genital apparatus is discussed. The sperm pumps differ strongly in Strepsiptera and Antliophora (s.s.) and are not homologous. The strepsipteran type, which lacks any sclerotized parts, has evolved independently. Autapomophies of the male genital apparatus are the compact testes, the large balloon‐shaped vesicula seminalis, the strongly developed musculature of the proximal ductus ejaculatorius, the strongly simplified copulatory organ, the unusual muscles of segments VIII and IX, and the complete absence of accessory glands. The median fusion and almost globular shape of the vesicula are potential autapomorphies of Corioxenidae. The absence of the furrow separating the testes from the vesicula seminalis is a derived condition found in Xenos and Myrmecolax. A sperm pump is absent in Boreus (Mecoptera) and Culicomorpha and the functionally relevant parts and their arrangement differ strongly in Siphonaptera, Pistillifera and Diptera (excl. Culicomorpha). The presence of a functional and homologous pumping apparatus does not belong to the groundplan of Antliophora, which implies that this alleged autapomorphy of the clade is invalid. A sperm pump belongs to the groundplan of Diptera and was secondarily reduced in Culicomorpha, many representatives of Bibionomorpha, and in Diopsidae. It was very likely primarily absent in Mecoptera. However, the precise reconstruction of the groundplan depends on the position of Nannochoristidae within Mecoptera and on the possible affinities of Siphonaptera and Boreidae. Sperm pumps should be considered as a functional term and not be used as a character for phylogenetic reconstruction, unless specific similarities are included in the character definition. 相似文献