The polarity of editing within a multiple gRNA-mediated domain is due to formation of anchors for upstream gRNAs by downstream editing.

Seventeen kinetoplast minicircle-encoded and nine maxicircle-encoded gRNA genes have been identified. Six overlapping minicircle-encoded gRNAs mediate editing for the 5'-pan-edited MURF4 gene and two for the 5'-edited COIII gene. The pan-edited RPS12 mRNA is edited by seven minicircle-encoded gRNAs and one maxicircle-encoded gRNA. The 3'-most gRNA in each domain forms an anchor with unedited mRNA, whereas upstream gRNAs form anchors only with edited mRNA, thereby explaining the observed 3' to 5' polarity of editing within an editing domain. We suggest that a role of G-U base pairs is to allow breathing of the edited mRNA-gRNA hybrid and formation of the upstream anchor hybrid.     

Genomic organization of Trypanosoma brucei kinetoplast DNA minicircles

The sequences of seven new Trypanosoma brucei kinetoplast DNA minicircles were obtained. A detailed comparative analysis of these sequences and those of the 18 complete kDNA minicircle sequences from T. brucei available in the database was performed. These 25 different minicircles contain 86 putative gRNA genes. The number of gRNA genes per minicircle varies from 2 to 5. In most cases, the genes are located between short imperfect inverted repeats, but in several minicircles there are inverted repeat cassettes that did not contain identifiable gRNA genes. Five minicircles contain single gRNA genes not surrounded by identifiable repeats. Two pairs of closely related minicircles may have recently evolved from common ancestors: KTMH1 and KTMH3 contained the same gRNA genes in the same order, whereas KTCSGRA and KTCSGRB contained two gRNA genes in the same order and one gRNA gene specific to each. All minicircles could be classified into two classes on the basis of a short substitution within the highly conserved region, but the minicircles in these two classes did not appear to differ in terms of gRNA content or gene organization. A number of redundant gRNAs containing identical editing information but different sequences were present. The alignments of the predicted gRNAs with the edited mRNA sequences varied from a perfect alignment without gaps to alignments with multiple mismatches. Multiple gRNAs overlapped with upstream gRNAs, but in no case was a complete set of overlapping gRNAs covering an entire editing domain obtained. We estimate that a minimum set of approximately 65 additional gRNAs would be required for complete overlapping sets. This analysis should provide a basis for detailed studies of the evolution and role in RNA editing of kDNA minicircles in this species.     

Implications of novel guide RNA features for the mechanism of RNA editing in Crithidia fasciculata.

We have determined the relative steady state concentration of the two Crithidia fasciculata guide (g)RNAs involved in editing the two domains of mRNAs for NADH dehydrogenase (ND) subunit 7. We found that, although there was an 8-fold difference between the molar ratio of these two gRNAs relative to the (pre)-mRNA, the two domains are edited with a very similar frequency (around 50%). Also, for the editing of a given domain, many gRNA species exist with the same 5' end but with a different 3' uridylation site. Approximately 20% of these short gRNAs do not contain the information required for editing a complete domain, which may explain the high incidence of partially edited RNAs. Remarkably, genomically encoded Us are missing from two sites of a few of the gRNAs involved in editing apocytochrome b RNA. We speculate that these species are created by editing-like events. Both the short and complete forms of the ND7 gRNAs are found in chimeric molecules, in which the gRNA is covalently linked via its 3'-terminus to an editing site of pre-edited ND7 RNA. Some features of the chimeric molecules are at odds with current models of RNA editing: (i) U residues are completely absent from the connecting sequence of a number of these molecules, (ii) the ND7 gRNAs are frequently hooked up to the wrong editing domain of ND7 RNA, although other gRNAs are not found at these positions and (iii) in some chimeric molecules the gRNA appears to be linked to the 5' end of pre-edited RNA.     

Maxicircle DNA and edited mRNA sequences of closely related trypanosome species: implications of kRNA editing for evolution of maxicircle genomes.

kRNA editing produces functional mRNAs by uridine insertion and deletion. We analyzed portions of the apocytochrome b and NADH dehydrogenase subunits 7 and 8 (ND7 and 8) genes and their edited mRNAs in Trypanosoma congolense and compared these to the corresponding sequences in T.brucei. We find that these genes are highly diverged between the two species, especially in the positions of thymidines and in nucleotide transitions. Editing eliminates differences in encoded uridines producing edited mRNAs that are identical except for the nucleotide substitutions. The resulting predicted proteins are identical since all nucleotide substitutions are silent. A T.congolense minicircle-encoded gRNA which can specify editing of ND8 mRNA was identified. This gRNA can basepair with both T.congolense and T.brucei ND8 mRNA despite nucleotide transitions due to the flexibility of G:U base-pairing. These results illustrate how editing affects the characteristics of maxicircle sequence divergence and allows protein sequence conservation despite a level of DNA sequence divergence which would be predicted to be intolerable in the absence of editing.     

Minicircle-encoded guide RNAs from Crithidia fasciculata.

Although the mitochondrial uridine insertion/deletion, guide RNA (gRNA)-mediated type of RNA editing has been described in Crithidia fasciculata, no evidence for the encoding of gRNAs in the kinetoplast minicircle DNA has been presented. There has also been a question as to the capacity of the minicircle DNA in this species to encode the required variety of gRNAs, because the kinetoplast DNA from the C1 strain has been reported as essentially containing a single minicircle sequence class. To address this problem, the genomic and mature edited sequences of the MURF4 and RPS12 cryptogenes were determined and a gRNA library was constructed from mitochondrial RNA. Five specific gRNAs were identified, two of which edit blocks within the MURF4 mRNA, and three of which edit blocks within the RPS12 mRNA. The genes for these gRNAs are all localized with identical polarity within one of the two variable regions of specific minicircle molecules, approximately 60 bp from the "bend" region. These minicircles were found to represent minor sequence classes representing approximately 2% of the minicircle DNA population in the network. The major minicircle sequence class also encodes a gRNA at the same relative genomic location, but the editing role of this gRNA was not determined. These results confirm that kinetoplast minicircle DNA molecules in this species encode gRNAs, as is the case in other trypanosomatids, and suggest that the copy number of specific minicircle sequence classes can vary dramatically without an overall effect on the RNA editing system.     

Trypanosoma brucei guide RNA poly(U) tail formation is stabilized by cognate mRNA

Guide RNAs (gRNAs) are small RNAs that provide specificity for uridine addition and deletion during mRNA editing in trypanosomes. Terminal uridylyl transferase (TUTase) adds uridines to pre-mRNAs during RNA editing and adds a poly(U) tail to the 3' end of gRNAs. The poly(U) tail may stabilize the association of gRNAs with cognate mRNA during editing. Both TUTase and gRNAs associate with two ribonucleoprotein complexes, I (19S) and II (35S to 40S). Complex II is believed to be the fully assembled active editing complex, since it contains pre-edited mRNA and enzymes thought necessary for editing. Purification of TUTase from mitochondrial extracts resulted in the identification of two chromatographically distinct TUTase activities. Stable single-uridine addition to different substrate RNAs is performed by the 19S complex, despite the presence of a uridine-specific 3' exonuclease within this complex. Multiple uridines are added to substrate RNAs by a 10S particle that may be an unstable subunit of complex I lacking the uridine-specific 3' exonuclease. Multiple uridines could be stably added onto gRNAs by complex I when the cognate mRNA is present. We propose a model in which the purine-rich region of the cognate mRNA protects the uridine tail from a uridine exonuclease activity that is present within the complex. To test this model, we have mutated the purine-rich region of the pre-mRNA to abolish base-pairing interaction with the poly(U) tail of the gRNA. This RNA fails to protect the uridine tail of the gRNA from exoribonucleolytic trimming and is consistent with a role for the purine-rich region of the mRNA in gRNA maturation.     

Organization and complexity of minicircle-encoded guide RNAs in Trypanosoma cruzi.

The previously observed extensive sequence heterogeneity of the kinetoplast minicircle DNA in Trypanosoma cruzi, both intra- and interstrain, has raised the question as to how the minicircle DNA in this species can have any guide RNA (gRNA)-coding capacity at all, because there do not appear to be any variable-region sequences conserved between different strains. To address this question, we obtained the complete edited sequence of maxicircle unidentified reading frame 4 mRNA and identified 25 cognate gRNAs from gRNA libraries constructed from two clonal strains of T. cruzi--Sylvio X10/CL1 and CAN III/CL1. Libraries of PCR-amplified minicircle-variable regions were also constructed for both strains. A single gene for each gRNA was identified in the same polarity within specific minicircle-variable regions from both strains, 60-100 nt downstream from the conserved 12mer sequence. GTP-capped total gRNA from one strain failed to cross-hybridize with minicircle DNA from the other strain. The explanation for this proved to be the number of polymorphisms, mainly transitions, within the homologous gRNAs in the two strains. In most cases, these transitions did not destroy the edited mRNA/gRNA base pairing, as a result of the allowed G-U wobble base pairing. The sequences of the variable regions containing homologous gRNAs in the two strains probably derived from an ancestral sequence, and each has accumulated sufficient polymorphisms so as not to allow hybridization. Within a strain, multiple redundant gRNAs were identified that encode identical editing information but have different sequences.     

A three-dimensional working model for a guide RNA from Trypanosoma brucei.

RNA editing in protozoan parasites is a mitochondrial RNA processing reaction in which exclusively uridylate residues are inserted into, and less frequently deleted from, pre-mRNAs. Molecules central to the process are so-called guide RNAs (gRNAs) which function as templates in the reaction. For a detailed molecular understanding of the mechanism of the editing process knowledge of structural features of gRNAs will be essential. Here we report on a computer-assisted molecular modelling approach to construct the first three-dimensional gRNA model for gND7-506, a ND7-specific gRNA from Trypanosoma brucei. The modelling process relied on chemical modification and enzymatic probing data and was validated by in vitro mutagenesis experiments. The model predicts a reasonably compact structure, where two stem/loop secondary structure elements are brought into close proximity by a triple A tertiary interaction, forming a core element within the centre of the molecule. The model further suggests that the surface of the gRNA is primarily made up of the sugar-phoshate backbone. On the basis of the model, footprinting experiments of gND7-506 in a complex with the gRNA binding protein gBP21 could successfully be interpreted and provide a first picture for the assembly of gRNAs within a ribonucleoprotein complex.     

Assembly of mitochondrial ribonucleoprotein complexes involves specific guide RNA (gRNA)-binding proteins and gRNA domains but does not require preedited mRNA.

RNA editing in kinetoplastids probably employs a macromolecular complex, the editosome, that is likely to include the guide RNAs (gRNAs) which specify the edited sequence. Specific ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complexes which form in vitro with gRNAs (H. U. Göringer, D. J. Koslowsky, T. H. Morales, and K. D. Stuart, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, in press) are potential editosomes or their precursors. We find that several factors are important for in vitro formation of these RNP complexes and identify specific gRNA-binding proteins present in the complexes. Preedited mRNA promotes the in vitro formation of the four major gRNA-containing RNP complexes under some conditions but is required for the formation of only a subcomponent of one complex. The 5' gRNA sequence encompassing the RYAYA and anchor regions and the 3' gRNA oligo(U) tail are both important in complex formation, since their deletion results in a dramatic decrease of some complexes and the absence of others. UV cross-linking experiments identify several proteins which are in contact with gRNA and preedited mRNA in mitochondrial extracts. Proteins of 25 and 90 kDa are highly specific for gRNAs, and the 90-kDa protein binds specifically to gRNA oligo(U) tails. The gRNA-binding proteins exhibit a differential distribution between the four in vitro-formed complexes. These experiments reveal several proteins potentially involved in RNA editing and indicate that multiple recognition elements in gRNAs are used for complex formation.     

Trypanosome RNA editing: simple guide RNA features enhance U deletion 100-fold

Trypanosome RNA editing is a massive processing of mRNA by U deletion and U insertion, directed by trans-acting guide RNAs (gRNAs). A U deletion cycle and a U insertion cycle have been reproduced in vitro using synthetic ATPase (A6) pre-mRNA and gRNA. Here we examine which gRNA features are important for this U deletion. We find that, foremost, this editing depends critically on the single-stranded character of a few gRNA and a few mRNA residues abutting the anchor duplex, a feature not previously appreciated. That plus any base-pairing sequence to tether the upstream mRNA are all the gRNA needs to direct unexpectedly efficient in vitro U deletion, using either the purified editing complex or whole extract. In fact, our optimized gRNA constructs support faithful U deletion up to 100 times more efficiently than the natural gRNA, and they can edit the majority of mRNA molecules. This is a marked improvement of in vitro U deletion, in which previous artificial gRNAs were no more active than natural gRNA and the editing efficiencies were at most a few percent. Furthermore, this editing is not stimulated by most other previously noted gRNA features, including its potential ligation bridge, 3' OH moiety, any U residues in the tether, the conserved structure of the central region, or proteins that normally bind these regions. Our data also have implications about evolutionary forces active in RNA editing.