Nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate: evidence of linkage to BCL3 in 17 multigenerational families.

Nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CL/P) is a common craniofacial developmental defect. Recent segregation analyses have suggested that major genes play a role in the etiology of CL/P. Linkage to 22 candidate genes was tested in 11 multigenerational families with CL/P, and 21 of these candidates were excluded. APOC2, 19q13.1, which is linked to the proto-oncogene BCL3, gave suggestive evidence for linkage to CL/P. The study was expanded to include a total of 39 multigenerational CL/P families. Linkage was tested in all families, using an anonymous marker, D19S178, and intragenic markers in BCL3 and APOC2. Linkage was tested under two models, autosomal dominant with reduced penetrance and affecteds only. Homogeneity testing on the two-point data gave evidence of heterogeneity at APOC2 under the affecteds-only model. Both models showed evidence of heterogeneity, with 43% of families linked at zero recombination to BCL3 when marker data from BCL3 and APOC2 were included. A maximum multipoint LOD score of 7.00 at BCL3 was found among the 17 families that had posterior probabilities > = 50% in favor of linkage. The transmission disequilibrium test provided additional evidence for linkage with the 3 allele of BCL3 more often transmitted to affected children. These results suggest that BCL3, or a nearby gene, plays a role in the etiology of CL/P in some families.     

Cleft lip and palate: no evidence of linkage to transforming growth factor alpha.

Recently, an association of a specific transforming growth factor alpha (TGFA) haplotype has been reported to occur in patients with nonsyndromic cleft lip and palate (CLP) who had a positive family history of the disorder. We tested linkage of CLP to TGFA in 12 multiplex families with clefting. TGFA haplotypes were constructed on the basis of three polymorphic restriction sites. No haplotype was associated with CLP, and discordant inheritance of TGFA haplotypes was observed in a single informative family. The log odds (LOD) score was -2.1 at theta = .05. These findings indicate that CLP and TGFA are not tightly linked in these families.     

Nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate in west Bengal, India: evidence for an autosomal major locus.

Ninety extended families having one or more individuals affected with nonsyndromic cleft lip (CL) with or without cleft palate (CL/P) were ascertained in rural West Bengal, India. These families included 138 affected people, 64% of whom had CL alone and 66% of whom were male. Multiple-affected-member ("multiplex") pedigrees were less common than single-affected-member ("simplex") pedigrees, composing 34% of all extended pedigrees. There was no difference between multiplex and simplex pedigrees in the frequency of affected persons with CL alone, but multiplex pedigrees had a lower frequency of affected males (58%) than did simplex pedigrees (76%; P = .02). Complex segregation analysis using the POINTER computer program rejected both the hypothesis of no familial transmission (P < .0001) and the hypothesis that familiarity could be explained solely by a multifactorial/threshold model (P < .05). The hypothesis of major-locus inheritance alone could not be rejected. Among major-locus models examined, strictly recessive inheritance was rejected (P < .0001), but codominant and dominant models were not. Neither the addition of a multifactorial component nor the addition of a proportion of sporadic cases to the major-locus model improved the fit of the data. In conclusion, the results of complex segregation analysis were consistent with a dominant or codominant major-locus mode of inheritance of CL/P in these families.     

Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic cleft lip and palate: significant evidence of linkage at 18q21.1

Nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate (NSCL/P) is one of the most common congenital facial defects, with an incidence of 1 in 700-1,000 live births among individuals of European descent. Several linkage and association studies of NSCL/P have suggested numerous candidate genes and genomic regions. A genomewide linkage analysis of a large multigenerational family (UR410) with NSCL/P was performed using a single-nucleotide-polymorphism array. Nonparametric linkage (NPL) analysis provided significant evidence of linkage for marker rs728683 on chromosome 18q21.1 (NPL=43.33 and P=.000061; nonparametric LOD=3.97 and P=.00001). Parametric linkage analysis with a dominant mode of inheritance and reduced penetrance resulted in a maximum LOD score of 3.61 at position 47.4 Mb on chromosome 18q21.1. Haplotype analysis with informative crossovers defined a 5.7-Mb genomic region spanned by proximal marker rs1824683 (42,403,918 bp) and distal marker rs768206 (48,132,862 bp). Thus, a novel genomic region on 18q21.1 was identified that most likely harbors a high-risk variant for NSCL/P in this family; we propose to name this locus "OFC11" (orofacial cleft 11).     

Familial recurrence-pattern analysis of cleft lip with or without cleft palate.

Cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CL/P) is a common congenital malformation with an incidence in European white populations of about 1/1,000. The familial clustering of CL/P has been extensively characterized, and epidemiological studies have proposed monogenic models (with reduced penetrance), multifactorial/threshold models, and mixed major-gene/multifactorial models to explain its inheritance. The recognition of an association between two RFLPs at the transforming growth factor alpha (TGFA) locus and CL/P supports a major-gene component to the etiology of CL/P. Risch has shown that the recurrence risk ratio lambda R (risk to relatives, vs. population prevalence) is a useful pointer to the mode of inheritance. Here we further develop the use of lambda R to analyze recurrence-risk data for CL/P. Recurrence risks for first-, second-, and third-degree relatives equate well with oligogenic models with as few as four loci. A monogenic/additive model is strongly rejected. The limited available twin data are also consistent with this model. A "major gene" interacting epistatically with an oligogenic background is shown to be a plausible alternative. Power calculations for a linkage study to map the CL/P major-risk locus suggest that a sample of 50 affected sib pairs will be adequate, but linkage to minor-risk loci will require very much larger samples.     

Mouse genetic models of cleft lip with or without cleft palate

Nonsyndromic cleft lip and palate (CLP) is among the most common human birth defects. Transmission patterns suggest that the causes are "multifactorial" combinations of genetic and nongenetic factors, mostly distinct from those causing cleft secondary palate (CP). The major etiological factors are largely unknown, and the embryological mechanisms are not well understood. In contrast to CP or neural tube defects (NTD), CLP is uncommon in mouse mutants. Fourteen known mutants or strains express CLP, often as part of a severe syndrome, whereas nonsyndromic CLP is found in two conditional mutants and in two multifactorial models based on a hypomorphic variant with an epigenetic factor. This pattern suggests that human nonsyndromic CLP is likely caused by regulatory and hypomorphic gene variants, and may also involve epigenetics. The developmental pathogenic mechanism varies among mutants and includes deficiencies of growth of the medial, lateral or maxillary facial prominences, defects in the fusion process itself, and shifted midline position of the medial prominences. Several CLP mutants also have NTD, suggesting potential genetic overlap of the traits in humans. The mutants may reflect two interacting sets of genetic signaling pathways: Bmp4, Bmpr1a, Sp8, and Wnt9b may be in one set, and Tcfap2a and Sox11 may be in another. Combining the results of chromosomal linkage studies of unidentified human CLP genes with insights from the mouse models, the following previously unexamined genes are identified as strong candidate genes for causative roles in human nonsyndromic CLP: BMP4, BMPR1B, TFAP2A, SOX4, WNT9B, WNT3, and SP8.     

Genetic linkage studies with cleft lip and palate: report of two family studies

Genetic linkage studies are reported on two families with cleft lip +/- cleft palate. For the first family (LP01) the etiology of the clefting is unknown, and the linkage analyses were done assuming both autosomal dominant and autosomal recessive inheritance. Close linkage is rejected with the Duffy blood group under the dominant model and with four loci (Duffy, Kidd, and ABO blood groups and haptoglobin) under the recessive model. The second family (LP02) is a Mexican-American family segregating the van der Woude syndrome with lip pits. The linkage analyses for this autosomal dominant trait excluded close linkage with seven genetic markers, including three on chromosome one. The maximum lod scores were 0.6 with BF (chromosome 6) and 0.4 with the P blood group, which is not yet mapped.     

Mode of inheritance of nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate: a reanalysis.

Nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CL +/- P) is traditionally recognized as a multifactorial threshold trait (MFT). Recently, however, evidence for the involvement of a major gene in the etiology of CL +/- P has been reported. To assess the potential for major-gene involvement in the etiology of this trait, familial recurrence patterns from several family studies of CL +/- P were reanalyzed. The recurrence patterns in first-degree relatives of CL +/- P probands were found to be compatible with the expectations for either an MFT or a generalized single-major-locus (gSML) trait. The use of multiple thresholds based on proband sex, defect bilaterality, or palatal involvement did not help to discriminate between these models. However, the pattern of recurrence among MZ twins and more remote relatives of CL +/- P probands is not consistent with gSML inheritance but is compatible with either an MFT model or a model specifying multiple interacting loci. For such a model, no single locus can account for more than a sixfold increase in risk to first-degree relatives. These findings have important implications with regard to the feasibility of detecting linkage to loci conferring susceptibility to CL +/- P.