Structure of a conjugating enzyme-ubiquitin thiolester intermediate reveals a novel role for the ubiquitin tail

BACKGROUND: Ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes (E2s) are central enzymes involved in ubiquitin-mediated protein degradation. During this process, ubiquitin (Ub) and the E2 protein form an unstable E2-Ub thiolester intermediate prior to the transfer of ubiquitin to an E3-ligase protein and the labeling of a substrate for degradation. A series of complex interactions occur among the target substrate, ubiquitin, E2, and E3 in order to efficiently facilitate the transfer of the ubiquitin molecule. However, due to the inherent instability of the E2-Ub thiolester, the structural details of this complex intermediate are not known. RESULTS: A three-dimensional model of the E2-Ub thiolester intermediate has been determined for the catalytic domain of the E2 protein Ubc1 (Ubc1(Delta450)) and ubiquitin from S. cerevisiae. The interface of the E2-Ub intermediate was determined by kinetically monitoring thiolester formation by 1H-(15)N HSQC spectra by using combinations of 15N-labeled and unlabeled Ubc1(Delta450) and Ub proteins. By using the surface interface as a guide and the X-ray structures of Ub and the 1.9 A structure of Ubc1(Delta450) determined here, docking simulations followed by energy minimization were used to produce the first model of a E2-Ub thiolester intermediate. CONCLUSIONS: Complementary surfaces were found on the E2 and Ub proteins whereby the C terminus of Ub wraps around the E2 protein terminating in the thiolester between C88 (Ubc1(Delta450)) and G76 (Ub). The model supports in vivo and in vitro experiments of E2 derivatives carrying surface residue substitutions. Furthermore, the model provides insights into the arrangement of Ub, E2, and E3 within a ternary targeting complex.     

Cdc34 self-association is facilitated by ubiquitin thiolester formation and is required for its catalytic activity

Using a coimmunoprecipitation strategy, we showed that the Cdc34 ubiquitin (Ub)-conjugating enzyme from Saccharomyces cerevisiae self-associates in cell lysates, thereby indicating an in vivo interaction. The ability of Cdc34 to interact with itself is not dependent on its association with the ubiquitin ligase Skp1-Cdc53/Cul1-Hrt1-F-box complex. Rather, this interaction depends upon the integrity of the Cdc34-Ub thiolester. Furthermore, several principal determinants within the Cdc34 catalytic domain, including the active-site cysteine, amino acid residues S73 and S97, and its catalytic domain insertion, also play a role in self-association. Mutational studies have shown that these determinants are functionally important in vivo and operate at the levels of both Cdc34-Ub thiolester formation and Cdc34-mediated multi-Ub chain assembly. These determinants are spatially situated in a region that is close to the active site, corresponding closely to the previously identified E2-Ub interface. These observations indicate that the formation of the Cdc34-Ub thiolester is important for Cdc34 self-association and that the interaction of Cdc34-Ub thiolesters is in turn a prerequisite for both multi-Ub chain assembly and Cdc34's essential function(s). A conclusion from these findings is that the placement of ubiquitin on the Cdc34 surface is a structurally important feature of Cdc34's function.     

Main chain and side chain dynamics of the ubiquitin conjugating enzyme variant human Mms2 in the free and ubiquitin-bound States

Protein ubiquitination involves a cascade of enzymatic steps where ubiquitin (Ub) is sequentially transferred as a thiolester intermediate from an E1 enzyme to an E2 enzyme and finally to the protein target with the help of a Ub-protein ligase. Protein ubiquitination brought about by the Ubc13-Mms2 (E2-E2) complex has a unique role in the cell, unrelated to protein degradation. The Mms2-Ubc13 heterodimer links Ub molecules to one another through an isopeptide bond between its own C-terminus and Lys-63 on another Ub. The role of Mms2 is to orient a target-bound Ub molecule such that its Lys-63 is proximal to the C-terminus of the Ub molecule that is covalently linked to the active site of Ubc13. To gain insight into the influence of protein dynamics on the affinity of Ub for Mms2, we have determined pico- to nanosecond time scale fluctuations of the main chain and methyl side chains of human Mms2 in the free and Ub-bound states using solution state (15)N and (2)H nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation measurements. Analysis of the relaxation data allows for a semiquantitative estimation of the conformational entropy change (TDeltaS(NMR)) for the main chain and side chain methyl groups of Mms2 upon binding Ub. The value of TDeltaS(NMR) for the main chain and side chain methyl groups of Mms2 is -8 +/- 2 and -2 +/- 2 kcal mol(-)(1), respectively. The experimental DeltaG(binding) for the Mms2.Ub complex is -6 kcal mol(-)(1). Estimation of DeltaG(binding) using an empirical structure-based approach that does not account for changes in main chain entropy yields a value of -17 +/- 2 kcal mol(-)(1). However, inclusion of TDeltaS(NMR) for the main chain of Mms2 increases the estimated DeltaG(binding) to -9 +/- 3 kcal mol(-)(1). Assuming that changes in Ub main chain dynamics contribute to TDeltaS(NMR) to the same extent as Mms2, the estimated DeltaG(binding) is further reduced to -1 +/- 4 kcal mol(-)(1), a value close to the experimental DeltaG(binding).     

Molecular and structural insight into lysine selection on substrate and ubiquitin lysine 48 by the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme Cdc34

The attachment of ubiquitin (Ub) to lysines on substrates or itself by ubiquitin-conjugating (E2) and ubiquitin ligase (E3) enzymes results in protein ubiquitination. Lysine selection is important for generating diverse substrate-Ub structures and targeting proteins to different fates; however, the mechanisms of lysine selection are not clearly understood. The positioning of lysine(s) toward the E2/E3 active site and residues proximal to lysines are critical in their selection. We investigated determinants of lysine specificity of the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme Cdc34, toward substrate and Ub lysines. Evaluation of the relative importance of different residues positioned −2, −1, +1 and +2 toward ubiquitination of its substrate, Sic1, on lysine 50 showed that charged residues in the −1 and −2 positions negatively impact on ubiquitination. Modeling suggests that charged residues at these positions alter the native salt-bridge interactions in Ub and Cdc34, resulting in misplacement of Sic1 lysine 50 in the Cdc34 catalytic cleft. During polyubiquitination, Cdc34 showed a strong preference for Ub lysine 48 (K48), with lower activity towards lysine 11 (K11) and lysine 63 (K63). Mutating the −2, −1, +1 and +2 sites surrounding K11 and K63 to mimic those surrounding K48 did not improve their ubiquitination, indicating that further determinants are important for Ub K48 specificity. Modeling the ternary structure of acceptor Ub with the Cdc34~Ub complex as well as in vitro ubiquitination assays unveiled the importance of K6 and Q62 of acceptor Ub for Ub K48 polyubiquitination. These findings provide molecular and structural insight into substrate lysine and Ub K48 specificity by Cdc34.     

Crystal structure of cyclic Lys48-linked tetraubiquitin

Lys48-linked polyubiquitin chains serve as a signal for protein degradation by 26S proteasomes through its Ile44 hydrophobic patches interactions. The individual ubiquitin units of each chain are conjugated through an isopeptide bond between Lys48 and the C-terminal Gly76 of the preceding units. The conformation of Lys48-linked tetraubiquitin has been shown to change dynamically depending on solution pH. Here we enzymatically synthesized a wild-type Lys48-linked tetraubiquitin for structural study. In the synthesis, cyclic and non-cyclic species were obtained as major and minor fractions, respectively. This enabled us to solve the crystal structure of tetraubiquitin exclusively with native Lys48-linkages at 1.85 Å resolution in low pH 4.6. The crystallographic data clearly showed that the C-terminus of the first ubiquitin is conjugated to the Lys48 residue of the fourth ubiquitin. The overall structure is quite similar to the closed form of engineered tetraubiquitin at near-neutral pH 6.7, previously reported, in which the Ile44 hydrophobic patches face each other. The structure of the second and the third ubiquitin units [Ub(2)-Ub(3)] connected through a native isopeptide bond is significantly different from the conformations of the corresponding linkage of the engineered tetraubiquitins, whereas the structures of Ub(1)-Ub(2) and Ub(3)-Ub(4) isopeptide bonds are almost identical to those of the previously reported structures. From these observations, we suggest that the flexible nature of the isopeptide linkage thus observed contributes to the structural arrangements of ubiquitin chains exemplified by the pH-dependent closed-to-open conformational transition of tetraubiquitin.     

A conserved catalytic residue in the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme family

Ubiquitin (Ub) regulates diverse functions in eukaryotes through its attachment to other proteins. The defining step in this protein modification pathway is the attack of a substrate lysine residue on Ub bound through its C-terminus to the active site cysteine residue of a Ub-conjugating enzyme (E2) or certain Ub ligases (E3s). So far, these E2 and E3 cysteine residues are the only enzyme groups known to participate in the catalysis of conjugation. Here we show that a strictly conserved E2 asparagine residue is critical for catalysis of E2- and E2/RING E3-dependent isopeptide bond formation, but dispensable for upstream and downstream reactions of Ub thiol ester formation. In contrast, the strictly conserved histidine and proline residues immediately upstream of the asparagine are dispensable for catalysis of isopeptide bond formation. We propose that the conserved asparagine side chain stabilizes the oxyanion intermediate formed during lysine attack. The E2 asparagine is the first non-covalent catalytic group to be proposed in any Ub conjugation factor.     

A SnapShot of Ubiquitin Chain Elongation: LYSINE 48-TETRA-UBIQUITIN SLOWS DOWN UBIQUITINATION*

We have explored the mechanisms of polyubiquitin chain assembly with reconstituted ubiquitination of IκBα and β-catenin by the Skp1-cullin 1-βTrCP F-box protein (SCF^βTrCP) E3 ubiquitin (Ub) ligase complex. Competition experiments revealed that SCF^βTrCP formed a complex with IκBα and that the Nedd8 modified E3-substrate platform engaged in dynamic interactions with the Cdc34 E2 Ub conjugating enzyme for chain elongation. Using “elongation intermediates” containing β-catenin linked with Ub chains of defined length, it was observed that a Lys-48-Ub chain of a length greater than four, but not its Lys-63 linkage counterparts, slowed the rate of additional Ub conjugation. Thus, the Ub chain length and linkage impact kinetic rates of chain elongation. Given that Lys-48-tetra-Ub is packed into compact conformations due to extensive intrachain interactions between Ub subunits, this topology may limit the accessibility of SCF^βTrCP/Cdc34 to the distal Ub Lys-48 and result in slowed elongation.     

Recruitment of Ubiquitin within an E2 Chain Elongation Complex

The ubiquitin (Ub) proteolysis pathway uses an E1, E2, and E3 enzyme cascade to label substrate proteins with ubiquitin and target them for degradation. The mechanisms of ubiquitin chain formation remain unclear and include a sequential addition model, in which polyubiquitin chains are built unit by unit on the substrate, or a preassembly model, in which polyubiquitin chains are preformed on the E2 or E3 enzyme and then transferred in one step to the substrate. The E2 conjugating enzyme UBE2K has a 150-residue catalytic core domain and a C-terminal ubiquitin-associated (UBA) domain. Polyubiquitin chains anchored to the catalytic cysteine and free in solution are formed by UBE2K supporting a preassembly model. To study how UBE2K might assemble polyubiquitin chains, we synthesized UBE2K-Ub and UBE2K-Ub₂ covalent complexes and analyzed E2 interactions with the covalently attached Ub and Ub₂ moieties using NMR spectroscopy. The UBE2K-Ub complex exists in multiple conformations, including the catalytically competent closed state independent of the UBA domain. In contrast, the UBE2K-Ub₂ complex takes on a more extended conformation directed by interactions between the classic I44 hydrophobic face of the distal Ub and the conserved MGF hydrophobic patch of the UBA domain. Our results indicate there are distinct differences between the UBE2K-Ub and UBE2K-Ub₂ complexes and show how the UBA domain can alter the position of a polyubiquitin chain attached to the UBE2K active site. These observations provide structural insights into the unique Ub chain-building capacity for UBE2K.     

Atypical binding of the Swa2p UBA domain to ubiquitin

Swa2p is an auxilin-like yeast protein that is involved in vesicular transport and required for uncoating of clathrin-coated vesicles. Swa2p contains a ubiquitin-associated (UBA) domain, which is present in a variety of proteins involved in ubiquitin (Ub)-mediated processes. We have determined a structural model of the Swa2p UBA domain in complex with Ub using NMR spectroscopy and molecular docking. Ub recognition occurs predominantly through an atypical interaction in which UBA helix α1 and the N-terminal part of helix α2 bind to Ub. Mutation of Ala148, a key residue in helix α1, to polar residues greatly reduced the affinity of the UBA domain for Ub and revealed a second low-affinity Ub-binding site located on the surface formed by helices α1 and α3. Surface plasmon resonance showed that the Swa2p UBA domain binds K48- and K63-linked di-Ub in a non-linkage-specific manner. These results reveal convergent evolution of a Ub-binding site on helix α1 of UBA domains involved in membrane protein trafficking.     

A conserved pathway to activate BRCA1-dependent ubiquitylation at DNA damage sites

The BRCA1 tumour suppressor and its heterodimeric partner BARD1 constitute an E3-ubiquitin (Ub) ligase and function in DNA repair by unknown mechanisms. We show here that the Caenorhabditis elegans BRCA1/BARD1 (CeBCD) complex possesses an E3-Ub ligase responsible for ubiquitylation at DNA damage sites following ionizing radiation (IR). The DNA damage checkpoint promotes the association of the CeBCD complex with E2-Ub conjugating enzyme, Ubc5(LET-70), leading to the formation of an active E3-Ub ligase on chromatin following IR. Correspondingly, defects in Ubc5(let-70) or the DNA damage checkpoint genes atl-1 or mre-11 abolish CeBCD-dependent ubiquitylation in vivo. Extending these findings to human cells reveals a requirement for UbcH5c, the MRN complex, gamma-H2AX and a co-dependence for ATM and ATR kinases for BRCA1-dependent ubiquitylation at DNA damage sites. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the DNA damage checkpoint promotes the association between BRCA1 and UbcH5c to form an active E3-Ub ligase on chromatin after IR. These data reveal that BRCA1-dependent ubiquitylation is activated at sites of DNA repair by the checkpoint as part of a conserved DNA damage response.     

Interaction of the tail with the catalytic region of a class II E2 conjugating enzyme

Ubiquitination plays an important role in many biological processes, including DNA repair, cell cycle regulation, and protein degradation. In the latter pathway the ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes or E2 enzymes are important proteins forming a key E2-ubiquitin thiolester prior to substrate labelling. While the structure of the 150-residue catalytic domain has been well characterized, a subset of E2 enzymes (class II) carry a variable length C-terminal `tail' where structural detail is not available. The presence of this C-terminal extension plays an important role in target recognition, ubiquitin chain assembly and oligomerization. In this work NMR spectroscopy was used to determine the secondary structure of the 215-residue yeast E2 protein Ubc1 and the interactions of its C-terminus with the catalytic domain. The C-terminal tail of Ubc1 was found to contain three -helices between residues D169-S176, K183-L193 and N203-L213 providing the first evidence for a well-defined secondary structure in this region. Chemical shift mapping indicated that residues in the L2 loop of the catalytic domain were most affected indicating the C-terminus of Ubc1 likely interacts with this region. This site of interaction is distinct from that observed in the E2-ubiquitin thiolester and may act to protect the catalytic C88 residue and direct the interaction of ubiquitin in the thiolester intermediate.     

Specificity of the interaction between ubiquitin-associated domains and ubiquitin

Ubiquitin-associated (UBA) domains are found in a large number of proteins with diverse functions involved in ubiquitination, DNA repair, and signaling pathways. Recent studies have shown that several UBA domain proteins interact with ubiquitin (Ub), specifically p62, the phosphotyrosine-independent ligand of the SH2 domain of p56(lck); HHR23A, a human nucleotide excision repair protein; and DDI1, another damage-inducible protein. NMR chemical shift mapping reveals that Ub binds specifically but weakly to a conserved hydrophobic epitope on HHR23A UBA(1) and UBA(2) and that the UBA domains bind on the hydrophobic patch on the surface of the five-stranded beta-sheet of Ub. Models of the UBA(1)-Ub and UBA(2)-Ub complexes obtained from de novo docking reveal different orientations of the UBA domains on the Ub surface compared with those obtained by homology modeling with the related CUE domains, which also bind Ub. Our results suggest that UBA domains may interact with Ub as well as other proteins in more than one way while utilizing the same binding surface.     

Structural insights into the conformation and oligomerization of E2~ubiquitin conjugates

Post-translational modification of proteins by ubiquitin (Ub) regulates a host of cellular processes, including protein quality control, DNA repair, endocytosis, and cellular signaling. In the ubiquitination cascade, a thioester-linked conjugate between the C-terminus of Ub and the active site cysteine of a ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme (E2) is formed. The E2~Ub conjugate interacts with a ubiquitin ligase (E3) to transfer Ub to a lysine residue on a target protein. The flexibly linked E2~Ub conjugates have been shown to form a range of structures in solution. In addition, select E2~Ub conjugates oligomerize through a noncovalent "backside" interaction between Ub and E2 components of different conjugates. Additional studies are needed to bridge the gap between the dynamic monomeric conjugates, E2~Ub oligomers, and the mechanisms of ubiquitination. We present a new 2.35 ? crystal structure of an oligomeric UbcH5c~Ub conjugate. The conjugate forms a staggered linear oligomer that differs substantially from the "infinite spiral" helical arrangement of the only previously reported structure of an oligomeric conjugate. Our structure also differs in intraconjugate conformation from other structurally characterized conjugates. Despite these differences, we find that the backside interaction mode is conserved in different conjugate oligomers and is independent of intraconjugate relative E2-Ub orientations. We delineate a common intraconjugate E2-binding surface on Ub. In addition, we demonstrate that an E3 CHIP (carboxyl terminus of Hsp70 interacting protein) interacts directly with UbcH5c~Ub oligomers, not only with conjugate monomers. These results provide insights into the conformational diversity of E2~Ub conjugates and conjugate oligomers, and into their compatibility and interactions with E3s, which have important consequences for the ubiquitination process.     

Molecular insights into RBR E3 ligase ubiquitin transfer mechanisms

RING‐in‐between‐RING (RBR) ubiquitin (Ub) ligases are a distinct class of E3s, defined by a RING1 domain that binds E2 Ub‐conjugating enzyme and a RING2 domain that contains an active site cysteine similar to HECT‐type E3s. Proposed to function as RING/HECT hybrids, details regarding the Ub transfer mechanism used by RBRs have yet to be defined. When paired with RING‐type E3s, E2s perform the final step of Ub ligation to a substrate. In contrast, when paired with RBR E3s, E2s must transfer Ub onto the E3 to generate a E3~Ub intermediate. We show that RBRs utilize two strategies to ensure transfer of Ub from the E2 onto the E3 active site. First, RING1 domains of HHARI and RNF144 promote open E2~Ubs. Second, we identify a Ub‐binding site on HHARI RING2 important for its recruitment to RING1‐bound E2~Ub. Mutations that ablate Ub binding to HHARI RING2 also decrease RBR ligase activity, consistent with RING2 recruitment being a critical step for the RBR Ub transfer mechanism. Finally, we demonstrate that the mechanism defined here is utilized by a variety of RBRs.     

Two Mms2 residues cooperatively interact with ubiquitin and are critical for Lys63 polyubiquitination in vitro and in vivo

Recent structural analyses support a model whereby Mms2 interacts with and orientates Ub to promote Ubc13-mediated Lys63 chain formation. However, residues of the hMms2-Ub interface have not been addressed. We found two hMms2 residues to be critical for binding and polyUb conjugation. Surprisingly, while each single mutation reduces the binding affinity, the double mutation causes significant reduction of Ub binding and abolishes polyUb chain formation. Furthermore, the corresponding yeast mms2 double mutant exhibited an additive phenotype that caused a complete loss of MMS2 function. Taken together, this study identifies key residues of the Mms2-Ub interface and provides direct experimental evidence that Mms2 physical association with Ub is correlated with its ability to promote Lys63-linked Ub chain assembly.     

Inherent dynamics within the Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic fever virus protease are localized to the same region as substrate interactions

Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic fever virus (CCHFV) is one of several lethal viruses that encodes for a viral ovarian tumor domain (vOTU), which serves to cleave and remove ubiquitin (Ub) and interferon stimulated gene product 15 (ISG15) from numerous proteins involved in cellular signaling. Such manipulation of the host cell machinery serves to downregulate the host response and, therefore, complete characterization of these proteases is important. While several structures of the CCHFV vOTU protease have been solved, both free and bound to Ub and ISG15, few structural differences have been found and little insight has been gained as to the structural plasticity of this protease. Therefore, we have used NMR relaxation experiments to probe the dynamics of CCHFV vOTU, both alone and in complex with Ub, discovering a highly dynamic protease that exhibits conformational exchange within the same regions found to engage its Ub substrate. These experiments reveal a structural plasticity around the N-terminal regions of CCHFV vOTU, which are unique to vOTUs, and provide a rationale for engaging multiple substrates with the same binding site.     

Dimeric pig heart succinate-coenzyme A transferase uses only one subunit to support catalysis

Pig heart succinate-coenzyme A transferase (succinyl-coenzyme A: 3-oxoacid coenzyme A transferase; E. C. 2.8.3.5.), a dimeric enzyme purified by affinity chromatography on Procion Blue MX-2G Sepharose, reacts with acetoacetyl-coenzyme A to form a covalent enzyme-coenzyme A thiolester intermediate in which the active site glutamate (E344) of both subunits each forms thiolester links with coenzyme A. Reaction of this dimeric enzyme-coenzyme A species with sodium borohydride leads to inactivation of the enzyme and reduction of the thiolester on both subunits to the corresponding enzyme alcohol, as judged by electrospray mass spectrometry. Reaction of the dimeric enzyme-coenzyme A intermediate with either succinate or acetoacetate, however, results in only one-half of the coenzyme A being transferred to the acceptor carboxylate to form either succinyl-coenzyme A or acetoacetyl-coenzyme A. Reaction of this latter enzyme species with borohydride caused no loss of enzyme activity despite the reduction of the remaining half of the enzyme-coenzyme A thiolester to the enzyme alcohol. That this catalytic asymmetry existed between subunits within the same enzyme dimer was demonstrated by showing that the enzyme species, created by successive reaction with acetoacetyl-coenzyme A and succinate, bound to Blue MX-2G Sepharose through the remaining available active site and could be eluted as a single chromatographic species by succinyl-coenzyme A. It is concluded that while both of the subunits of the succinate-coenzyme A transferase dimer are able to form enzyme-coenzyme A thiolester intermediates, only one subunit is competent to transfer the coenzyme A moiety to a carboxylic acid acceptor to form the new acyl-coenzyme A product. The possible structural basis for this catalytic asymmetry and its mechanistic implications are discussed.     

Structural mechanism of enoyl-CoA hydratase: three atoms from a single water are added in either an E1cb stepwise or concerted fashion

We have determined the crystal structure of the enzyme enoyl-CoA hydratase (ECH) from rat liver with the bound substrate 4-(N,N-dimethylamino)cinnamoyl-CoA using X-ray diffraction data to a resolution of 2.3 A. In addition to the thiolester substrate, the catalytic water, which is added in the hydration reaction, has been modeled into well-defined electron density in each of the six active sites of the physiological hexamer within the crystallographic asymmetric unit. The catalytic water bridges Glu(144) and Glu(164) of the enzyme and has a lone pair of electrons poised to react with C(3) of the enzyme-bound alpha,beta-unsaturated thiolester. The water molecule, which bridges two glutamate residues, is reminiscent of the enolase active site. However, unlike enolase, which has a lysine available to donate a proton, there are no other sources of protons available from other active site residues in ECH. Furthermore, an analysis of the hydrogen-bonding network of the active site suggests that both Glu(144) and Glu(164) are ionized and carry a negative charge with no reasonable place to have a protonated carboxylate. This lack of hydrogen-bonding acceptors that could accommodate a source of a proton, other than from the water molecule, leads to a hypothesis that the three atoms from a single water molecule are added across the double bond to form the hydrated product. The structural results are discussed in connection with details of the mechanism, which have been elucidated from kinetics, site-directed mutagenesis, and spectroscopy of enzyme-substrate species, in presenting an atomic-resolution mechanism of the reaction. Contrary to the previous interpretation, the structure of the E-S complex together with previously determined kinetic isotope effects is consistent with either a concerted mechanism or an E1cb stepwise mechanism.     

Proteome-wide identification of ubiquitylation sites by conjugation of engineered lysine-less ubiquitin

Ubiquitin conjugation (ubiquitylation) plays important roles not only in protein degradation but also in many other cellular functions. However, the sites of proteins that are targeted for such modification have remained poorly characterized at the proteomic level. We have now developed a method for the efficient identification of ubiquitylation sites in target proteins with the use of an engineered form of ubiquitin (K0-Ub), in which all seven lysine residues are replaced with arginine. K0-Ub is covalently attached to lysine residues of target proteins via an isopeptide bond, but further formation of a polyubiquitin chain does not occur on K0-Ub. We identified a total of 1392 ubiquitylation sites of 794 proteins from HEK293T cells. Profiling of ubiquitylation sites indicated that the sequences surrounding lysine residues targeted for ubiquitin conjugation do not share a common motif or structural feature. Furthermore, we identified a critical ubiquitylation site of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27(Kip1). Mutation of this site thus inhibited ubiquitylation of and stabilized p27(Kip1), suggesting that this lysine residue is the target site of p27(Kip1) for ubiquitin conjugation in vivo. In conclusion, our method based on K0-Ub is a powerful tool for proteome-wide identification of ubiquitylation sites of target proteins.