Predominant membrane localization is an essential feature of the bacterial signal recognition particle receptor

Background  

The signal recognition particle (SRP) receptor plays a vital role in co-translational protein targeting, because it connects the soluble SRP-ribosome-nascent chain complex (SRP-RNCs) to the membrane bound Sec translocon. The eukaryotic SRP receptor (SR) is a heterodimeric protein complex, consisting of two unrelated GTPases. The SRβ subunit is an integral membrane protein, which tethers the SRP-interacting SRα subunit permanently to the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. The prokaryotic SR lacks the SRβ subunit and consists of only the SRα homologue FtsY. Strikingly, although FtsY requires membrane contact for functionality, cell fractionation studies have localized FtsY predominantly to the cytosolic fraction of Escherichia coli. So far, the exact function of the soluble SR in E. coli is unknown, but it has been suggested that, in contrast to eukaryotes, the prokaryotic SR might bind SRP-RNCs already in the cytosol and only then initiates membrane targeting.     

The Sec translocon mediated protein transport in prokaryotes and eukaryotes

Protein transport via the Sec translocon represents an evolutionary conserved mechanism for delivering cytosolically-synthesized proteins to extra-cytosolic compartments. The Sec translocon has a three-subunit core, termed Sec61 in Eukaryotes and SecYEG in Bacteria. It is located in the endoplasmic reticulum of Eukaryotes and in the cytoplasmic membrane of Bacteria where it constitutes a channel that can be activated by multiple partner proteins. These partner proteins determine the mechanism of polypeptide movement across the channel. During SRP-dependent co-translational targeting, the ribosome threads the nascent protein directly into the Sec channel. This pathway is in Bacteria mainly dedicated for membrane proteins but in Eukaryotes also employed by secretory proteins. The alternative pathway, leading to post-translational translocation across the Sec translocon engages an ATP-dependent pushing mechanism by the motor protein SecA in Bacteria and a ratcheting mechanism by the lumenal chaperone BiP in Eukaryotes. Protein transport and biogenesis is also assisted by additional proteins at the lateral gate of SecY/Sec61α and in the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum or in the periplasm of bacterial cells. The modular assembly enables the Sec complex to transport a vast array of substrates. In this review we summarize recent biochemical and structural information on the prokaryotic and eukaryotic Sec translocons and we describe the remarkably complex interaction network of the Sec complexes.     

Identification of YidC Residues That Define Interactions with the Sec Apparatus

In bacteria, a subset of membrane proteins insert into the membrane via the Sec apparatus with the assistance of the widely conserved essential membrane protein insertase YidC. After threading into the SecYEG translocon, transmembrane segments of nascent proteins are thought to exit the translocon via a lateral gate in SecY, where YidC facilitates their transfer into the lipid bilayer. Interactions between YidC and components of the Sec apparatus are critical to its function. The first periplasmic loop of YidC interacts directly with SecF. We sought to identify the regions or residues of YidC that interact with SecY or with additional components of the Sec apparatus other than SecDF. Using a synthetic lethal screen, we identified residues of YidC that, when mutated, led to dependence on SecDF for viability. Each residue identified is highly conserved among YidC homologs; most lie within transmembrane domains. Overexpression of SecY in the presence of two YidC mutants partially rescued viability in the absence of SecDF, suggesting that the corresponding wild-type YidC residues (G355 and M471) participate in interactions, direct or indirect, with SecY. Staphylococcus aureus YidC complemented depletion of YidC, but not of SecDF, in Escherichia coli. G355 of E. coli YidC is invariant in S. aureus YidC, suggesting that this highly conserved glycine serves a conserved function in interactions with SecY. This study demonstrates that transmembrane residues are critical in YidC interactions with the Sec apparatus and provides guidance on YidC residues of interest for future structure-function analyses.     

Structural and Functional Profiling of the Lateral Gate of the Sec61 Translocon

The evolutionarily conserved Sec61 translocon mediates the translocation and membrane insertion of proteins. For the integration of proteins into the membrane, the Sec61 translocon opens laterally to the lipid bilayer. Previous studies suggest that the lateral opening of the channel is mediated by the helices TM2b and TM7 of a pore-forming subunit of the Sec61 translocon. To map key residues in TM2b and TM7 in yeast Sec61 that modulate lateral gating activity, we performed alanine scanning and in vivo site-directed photocross-linking experiments. Alanine scanning identified two groups of critical residues in the lateral gate, one group that leads to defects in the translocation and membrane insertion of proteins and the other group that causes faster translocation and facilitates membrane insertion. Photocross-linking data show that the former group of residues is located at the interface of the lateral gate. Furthermore, different degrees of defects for the membrane insertion of single- and double-spanning membrane proteins were observed depending on whether the mutations were located in TM2b or TM7. These results demonstrate subtle differences in the molecular mechanism of the signal sequence binding/opening of the lateral gate and membrane insertion of a succeeding transmembrane segment in a polytopic membrane protein.     

Organization of the native ribosome–translocon complex at the mammalian endoplasmic reticulum membrane

BackgroundIn eukaryotic cells, many proteins have to be transported across or inserted into the endoplasmic reticulum membrane during their biogenesis on the ribosome. This process is facilitated by the protein translocon, a highly dynamic multi-subunit membrane protein complex.Scope of reviewThe aim of this review is to summarize the current structural knowledge about protein translocon components in mammals.Major conclusionsVarious structural biology approaches have been used in synergy to characterize the translocon in recent years. X-ray crystallography and cryoelectron microscopy single particle analysis have yielded highly detailed insights into the structure and functional mechanism of the protein-conducting channel Sec61, which constitutes the functional core of the translocon. Cryoelectron tomography and subtomogram analysis have advanced our understanding of the overall structure, molecular organization and compositional heterogeneity of the translocon in a native membrane environment. Tomography densities at subnanometer resolution revealed an intricate network of interactions between the ribosome, Sec61 and accessory translocon components that assist in protein transport, membrane insertion and maturation.General significanceThe protein translocon is a gateway for approximately one third of all synthesized proteins and numerous human diseases are associated with malfunctioning of its components. Thus, detailed insights into the structure and molecular organization of the translocon will not only advance our understanding of membrane protein biogenesis in general, but they can potentially pave the way for novel therapeutic approaches against human diseases.     

Practical aspects of overexpressing bacterial secondary membrane transporters for structural studies

Membrane transporter proteins play critical physiological roles in the cell and constitute 5-10% of prokaryotic and eukaryotic genomes. High-resolution structural information is essential for understanding the functional mechanism of these proteins. A prerequisite for structural study is to overexpress such proteins in large quantities. In the last few years, over 20 bacterial membrane transporters were overexpressed at a level of 1 mg/l of culture or higher, most often in Escherichia coli. In this review, we analyzed those factors that affect the quantity and quality of the protein produced, and summarized recent progress in overexpression of membrane transporters from bacterial inner membrane. Rapid progress in genome sequencing provides opportunities for expressing several homologues and orthologues of the target protein simultaneously, while the availability of various expression vectors allows flexible experimental design. Careful optimization of cell culture conditions can drastically improve the expression level and homogeneity of the target protein. New sample preparation techniques for mass spectrometry of membrane proteins have enabled one to identity the rigid protein core, which can be subsequently overexpressed. Size-exclusion chromatography on HPLC has proven to be an efficient method in screening detergent, pH an other conditions required for maintaining the stability and monodispersity of the protein. Such high-quality preparations of membrane transporter proteins will probably lead to successful crystallization and structure determination of these proteins in the next few years.     

Positively charged amino acids placed next to a signal sequence block protein translocation more efficiently in Escherichia coli than in mammalian microsomes

Positively charged amino acids are known efficiently to block protein secretion in Escherichia coli, when placed within a short distance downstream of a signal sequence. It is not known whether the same applies to protein secretion in eukaryotic cells, though statistical studies of signal sequences of prokaryotic and eukaryotic secretory proteins have suggested that the situation may be different in this case. Here, we show that identical charge mutations in a model protein have different effects on membrane translocation in E. coli and in mammalian microsomes, and that the ‘charge block’ effect is much more pronounced in the prokaryotic system. This finding has implications not only for our understanding of the mechanisms of protein secretion, but also points to a potential problem in the expression of eukaryotic secretory proteins in bacteria.     

Eukaryotic integral membrane protein expression utilizing the <Emphasis Type="Italic">Escherichia coli</Emphasis> glycerol-conducting channel protein (GlpF)

A fusion protein expression system is described that allows for production of eukaryotic integral membrane proteins in Escherichia coli (E. coli). The eukaryotic membrane protein targets are fused to the C terminus of the highly expressed E. coli inner membrane protein, GlpF (the glycerol-conducting channel protein). The generic utility of this system for heterologous membrane-protein expression is demonstrated by the expression and insertion into the E. coli cell membrane of the human membrane proteins: occludin, claudin 4, duodenal ferric reductase and a J-type inwardly rectifying potassium channel. The proteins are produced with C-terminal hexahistidine tags (to permit purification of the expressed fusion proteins using immobilized metal affinity chromatography) and a peptidase cleavage site (to allow recovery of the unfused eukaryotic protein).     

Revolutionizing membrane protein overexpression in bacteria

The bacterium Escherichia coli is the most widely used expression host for overexpression trials of membrane proteins. Usually, different strains, culture conditions and expression regimes are screened for to identify the optimal overexpression strategy. However, yields are often not satisfactory, especially for eukaryotic membrane proteins. This has initiated a revolution of membrane protein overexpression in bacteria. Recent studies have shown that it is feasible to (i) engineer or select for E. coli strains with strongly improved membrane protein overexpression characteristics, (ii) use bacteria other than E. coli for the expression of membrane proteins, (iii) engineer or select for membrane protein variants that retain functionality but express better than the wild-type protein, and (iv) express membrane proteins using E. coli-based cell-free systems.     

Involvement of PpiD in Sec-dependent protein translocation

The periplasmic space in between the inner and outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria contains numerous chaperones that are involved in the biogenesis and rescue of extra-cytosolic proteins. In contrast to most of those periplasmic chaperones, PpiD is anchored by an N-terminal transmembrane domain within the inner membrane of Escherichia coli. There it is located in close proximity to the SecY subunit of the SecYEG translocon, which is the primary transporter for secretory and membrane proteins. By site-specific cross-linking we now found the periplasmic domain of PpiD also in close vicinity to the SecG subunit of the Sec translocon and we provide the first direct evidence for a functional cooperation between PpiD and the Sec translocon. Thus we demonstrate that PpiD stimulates in a concentration-dependent manner the translocation of two different secretory proteins into proteoliposomes that had been reconstituted with sub-saturating amounts of SecYEG. In addition we found ribosome-associated nascent chains of a secretory protein stalled at SecY also being in close contact to PpiD. Collectively these results suggest that PpiD plays a role in clearing the Sec translocon of newly translocated secretory proteins thereby improving the overall translocation efficiency. Consistent with this conclusion we demonstrate that PpiD contributes to the efficient detachment of newly secreted OmpA from the inner membrane and in doing so, seems to cooperate in a hierarchical manner with other periplasmic chaperones such as SurA, DegP, and Skp.     

Signal Recognition Particle and SecA Cooperate during Export of Secretory Proteins with Highly Hydrophobic Signal Sequences

The Sec translocon of bacterial plasma membranes mediates the linear translocation of secretory proteins as well as the lateral integration of membrane proteins. Integration of many membrane proteins occurs co-translationally via the signal recognition particle (SRP)-dependent targeting of ribosome-associated nascent chains to the Sec translocon. In contrast, translocation of classical secretory proteins across the Sec translocon is a post-translational event requiring no SRP but the motor protein SecA. Secretory proteins were, however, reported to utilize SRP in addition to SecA, if the hydrophobicity of their signal sequences exceeds a certain threshold value. Here we have analyzed transport of this subgroup of secretory proteins across the Sec translocon employing an entirely defined in vitro system. We thus found SecA to be both necessary and sufficient for translocation of secretory proteins with hydrophobic signal sequences, whereas SRP and its receptor improved translocation efficiency. This SRP-mediated boost of translocation is likely due to the early capture of the hydrophobic signal sequence by SRP as revealed by site-specific photo cross-linking of ribosome nascent chain complexes.     

Dynamic Interaction of the Sec Translocon with the Chaperone PpiD

The Sec translocon constitutes a ubiquitous protein transport channel that consists in bacteria of the three core components: SecY, SecE, and SecG. Additional proteins interact with SecYEG during different stages of protein transport. During targeting, SecYEG interacts with SecA, the SRP receptor, or the ribosome. Protein transport into or across the membrane is then facilitated by the interaction of SecYEG with YidC and the SecDFYajC complex. During protein transport, SecYEG is likely to interact also with the protein quality control machinery, but details about this interaction are missing. By in vivo and in vitro site-directed cross-linking, we show here that the periplasmic chaperone PpiD is located in front of the lateral gate of SecY, through which transmembrane domains exit the SecY channel. The strongest contacts were found to helix 2b of SecY. Blue native PAGE analyses verify the presence of a SecYEG-PpiD complex in native Escherichia coli membranes. The PpiD-SecY interaction was not influenced by the addition of SecA and only weakly influenced by binding of nontranslating ribosomes to SecYEG. In contrast, PpiD lost contact to the lateral gate of SecY during membrane protein insertion. These data identify PpiD as an additional and transient subunit of the bacterial SecYEG translocon. The data furthermore demonstrate the highly modular and versatile composition of the Sec translocon, which is probably essential for its ability to transport a wide range of substrates across membranes in bacteria and eukaryotes.     

High-throughput production of prokaryotic membrane proteins

Membrane proteins constitute ~30% of prokaryotic and eukaryotic genomes but comprise a small fraction of the entries in protein structural databases. A number of features of membrane proteins render them challenging targets for the structural biologist, among which the most important is the difficulty in obtaining sufficient quantities of purified protein. We are exploring procedures to express and purify large numbers of prokaryotic membrane proteins. A set of 280 membrane proteins from Escherichia coli and Thermotoga maritima, a thermophile, was cloned and tested for expression in Escherichia coli. Under a set of standard conditions, expression could be detected in the membrane fraction for approximately 30% of the cloned targets. About 22 of the highest expressing membrane proteins were purified, typically in just two chromatographic steps. There was a clear correlation between the number of predicted transmembrane domains in a given target and its propensity to express and purify. Accordingly, the vast majority of successfully expressed and purified proteins had six or fewer transmembrane domains. We did not observe any clear advantage to the use of thermophilic targets. Two of the purified membrane proteins formed crystals. By comparison with protein production efforts for soluble proteins, where ∼70% of cloned targets express and ∼25% can be readily purified for structural studies [Christendat et al. (2000) Nat. Struct. Biol., 7, 903], our results demonstrate that a similar approach will succeed for membrane proteins, albeit with an expected higher attrition rate.     

SuptoxD2.0: A second-generation engineered Escherichia coli strain achieving further enhanced levels of recombinant membrane protein production

The bacterium Escherichia coli is among the most popular hosts for recombinant protein production, including that of membrane proteins (MPs). We have recently generated the specialized MP-producing E. coli strain SuptoxD, which upon co-expression of the effector gene djlA, is capable of alleviating two major bottlenecks in bacterial recombinant MP production: it suppresses the toxicity that frequently accompanies the MP-overexpression process and it markedly increases the cellular accumulation of membrane incorporated and properly folded recombinant MP. Combined, these two positive effects result in dramatically enhanced volumetric yields for various recombinant MPs of both prokaryotic and eukaryotic origin. Based on the observation that djlA is found in the genomes of various pathogenic bacteria, the aim of the present work was to investigate (a) whether other naturally occurring DjlA variants can exert the MP toxicity-suppressing and production-promoting effects similarly to the E. coli DjlA and (b) if we can identify a DjlA variant whose efficiency surpasses that of the E. coli DjlA of SuptoxD. We report that a quite surprisingly broad variety of homologous DjlA proteins exert beneficial effects on recombinant MP when overexpressed in E. coli. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the Salmonella enterica DjlA is an even more potent enhancer of MP productivity compared with the E. coli DjlA of SuptoxD. Based on this, we constructed a second-generation SuptoxD strain, termed SuptoxD2.0, whose MP-production capabilities surpass significantly those of the original SuptoxD, and we anticipate that SuptoxD2.0 will become a broadly utilized expression host for recombinant MP production in bacteria.     

Double-spanning plant viral movement protein integration into the endoplasmic reticulum membrane is signal recognition particle-dependent, translocon-mediated, and concerted

The current model for cell-to-cell movement of plant viruses holds that transport requires virus-encoded movement proteins that intimately associate with endoplasmic reticulum membranes. We have examined the early stages of the integration into endoplasmic reticulum membranes of a double-spanning viral movement protein using photocross-linking. We have discovered that this process is cotranslational and proceeds in a signal recognition particle-dependent manner. In addition, nascent chain photocross-linking to Sec61alpha and translocating chain-associated membrane protein reveal that viral membrane protein insertion takes place via the translocon, as with most eukaryotic membrane proteins, but that the two transmembrane segments of the viral protein leave the translocon and enter the lipid bilayer together.     

Ribosomal RNAs are tolerant toward genetic insertions: evolutionary origin of the expansion segments

Ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs), assisted by ribosomal proteins, form the basic structure of the ribosome, and play critical roles in protein synthesis. Compared to prokaryotic ribosomes, eukaryotic ribosomes contain elongated rRNAs with several expansion segments and larger numbers of ribosomal proteins. To investigate architectural evolution and functional capability of rRNAs, we employed a Tn5 transposon system to develop a systematic genetic insertion of an RNA segment 31 nt in length into Escherichia coli rRNAs. From the plasmid library harboring a single rRNA operon containing random insertions, we isolated surviving clones bearing rRNAs with functional insertions that enabled rescue of the E. coli strain (Δ7rrn) in which all chromosomal rRNA operons were depleted. We identified 51 sites with functional insertions, 16 sites in 16S rRNA and 35 sites in 23S rRNA, revealing the architecture of E. coli rRNAs to be substantially flexible. Most of the insertion sites show clear tendency to coincide with the regions of the expansion segments found in eukaryotic rRNAs, implying that eukaryotic rRNAs evolved from prokaryotic rRNAs suffering genetic insertions and selections.     

YidC, an assembly site for polytopic Escherichia coli membrane proteins located in immediate proximity to the SecYE translocon and lipids

Like its mitochondrial homolog Oxa1p, the inner membrane protein YidC of Escherichia coli is involved in the integration of membrane proteins. We have analyzed individual insertion steps of the polytopic E. coli membrane protein MtlA targeted as ribosome-nascent chain complexes to inner membrane vesicles. YidC can accommodate at least the first two transmembrane segments of MtlA at the protein lipid interface and retain them even though the length of the nascent chain would amply allow insertion into membrane lipids. An even longer insertion intermediate of MtlA is described that still has the first transmembrane helix bound to YidC while the third contacts SecE and YidC during integration. Our findings suggest that YidC forms a contiguous integration unit with the SecYE translocon and functions as an assembly site for polytopic membrane proteins mediating the formation of helix bundles prior to their release into the membrane lipids.     

Comparative Analysis of the Ribosomal Componentsof the Hydrogenosome-Containing Protist, Trichomonas vaginalis

The ribosomes of the amitochondriate but hydrogenosome-containing protist lineage, the trichomonads, have previously been reported to be prokaryotic or primitive eukaryotic, based on evidence that they have a 70S sedimentation coefficient and a small number of proteins, similar to prokaryotic ribosomes. In order to determine whether the components of the trichomonad ribosome indeed differ from those of typical eukaryotic ribosomes, the ribosome of a representative trichomonad, Trichomonas vaginalis, was characterized. The sedimentation coefficient of the T. vaginalis ribosome was smaller than that of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and larger than that of Escherichia coli. Based on two-dimensional PAGE analysis, the number of different ribosomal proteins was estimated to be approximately 80. This number is the same as those obtained for typical eukaryotes (approximately 80) but larger than that of E. coli (approximately 55). N-Terminal amino acid sequencing of 18 protein spots and the complete sequences of 4 ribosomal proteins as deduced from their genes revealed these sequences to display typical eukaryotic features. Phylogenetic analyses of the five ribosomal proteins currently available also clearly confirmed that the T. vaginalis sequences are positioned within a eukaryotic clade. Comparison of deduced secondary structure models of the small and large subunit rRNAs of T. vaginalis with those of other eukaryotes revealed that all helices commonly found in typical eukaryotes are present and conserved in T. vaginalis, while variable regions are shortened or lost. These lines of evidence demonstrate that the T. vaginalis ribosome has no prokaryotic or primitive eukaryotic features but is clearly a typical eukaryotic type.     

The bacterial SRP receptor, SecA and the ribosome use overlapping binding sites on the SecY translocon

Signal recognition particle (SRP)-dependent protein targeting is a universally conserved process that delivers proteins to the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane or to the endoplasmic reticulum membrane in eukaryotes. Crucial during targeting is the transfer of the ribosome-nascent chain complex (RNC) from SRP to the Sec translocon. In eukaryotes, this step is co-ordinated by the SRβ subunit of the SRP receptor (SR), which probably senses a vacant translocon by direct interaction with the translocon. Bacteria lack the SRβ subunit and how they co-ordinate RNC transfer is unknown. By site-directed cross-linking and fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) analyses, we show that FtsY, the bacterial SRα homologue, binds to the exposed C4/C5 loops of SecY, the central component of the bacterial Sec translocon. The same loops serve also as binding sites for SecA and the ribosome. The FtsY-SecY interaction involves at least the A domain of FtsY, which attributes an important function to this so far ill-defined domain. Binding of FtsY to SecY residues, which are also used by SecA and the ribosome, probably allows FtsY to sense an available translocon and to align the incoming SRP-RNC with the protein conducting channel. Thus, the Escherichia coli FtsY encompasses the functions of both the eukaryotic SRα and SRβ subunits in one single protein.