Directed import of macromolecules into mitochondria

Mitochondria are multifunctional eukaryotic organelles that provide cells with energy via oxidative phosphorylation. They participate in the formation of Fe-S clusters, oxidation of fatty acids, and synthesis of certain amino acids and play an important role in apoptosis. Mitochondria have their own genome and are able to transcribe and translate it. However, most macromolecules functioning in mitochondria, such as proteins and some small RNAs, are imported from the cytoplasm. Protein import into mitochondria is a universal process, and its mechanism is very similar in all eukaryotic cells. Today this mechanism is known in detail. At the same time, the RNA import was discovered only in several eukaryotic groups. Nevertheless, it is proposed that this process is typical for most species. A set of imported RNA molecules varies in different organisms. Although the knowledge about the mechanisms of RNA import is less extensive than that of protein import, it becomes clear that these mechanisms greatly differ between different species. The review summarizes information about the import of such macromolecules into mitochondria.     

Signal recognition initiates reorganization of the presequence translocase during protein import

The mitochondrial presequence translocase interacts with presequence‐containing precursors at the intermembrane space (IMS) side of the inner membrane to mediate their translocation into the matrix. Little is known as too how these matrix‐targeting signals activate the translocase in order to initiate precursor transport. Therefore, we analysed how signal recognition by the presequence translocase initiates reorganization among Tim‐proteins during import. Our analyses revealed that the presequence receptor Tim50 interacts with Tim21 in a signal‐sensitive manner in a process that involves the IMS‐domain of the Tim23 channel. The signal‐driven release of Tim21 from Tim50 promotes recruitment of Pam17 and thus triggers formation of the motor‐associated form of the TIM23 complex required for matrix transport.     

Structural basis for the function of Tim50 in the mitochondrial presequence translocase

Many mitochondrial proteins are synthesized as preproteins carrying amino-terminal presequences in the cytosol. The preproteins are imported by the translocase of the outer mitochondrial membrane and the presequence translocase of the inner membrane. Tim50 and Tim23 transfer preproteins through the intermembrane space to the inner membrane. We report the crystal structure of the intermembrane space domain of yeast Tim50 to 1.83 Å resolution. A protruding β-hairpin of Tim50 is crucial for interaction with Tim23, providing a molecular basis for the cooperation of Tim50 and Tim23 in preprotein translocation to the protein-conducting channel of the mitochondrial inner membrane.     

A J-protein is an essential subunit of the presequence translocase-associated protein import motor of mitochondria

Transport of preproteins into the mitochondrial matrix is mediated by the presequence translocase-associated motor (PAM). Three essential subunits of the motor are known: mitochondrial Hsp70 (mtHsp70); the peripheral membrane protein Tim44; and the nucleotide exchange factor Mge1. We have identified the fourth essential subunit of the PAM, an essential inner membrane protein of 18 kD with a J-domain that stimulates the ATPase activity of mtHsp70. The novel J-protein (encoded by PAM18/YLR008c/TIM14) is required for the interaction of mtHsp70 with Tim44 and protein translocation into the matrix. We conclude that the reaction cycle of the PAM of mitochondria involves an essential J-protein.     

A dynamic machinery for import of mitochondrial precursor proteins

Mitochondria contain approximately 1000 different proteins, which are located in four different compartments, outer membrane, inner membrane, intermembrane space and matrix. The vast majority of these proteins has to be imported from the cytosol. Therefore, sophisticated molecular machineries have evolved that mediate protein translocation across or insertion into mitochondrial membranes and subsequent assembly into multi-subunit complexes. While the initial entry of virtually all mitochondrial proteins is mediated by the general import pore of the outer membrane, at least four different downstream pathways are dedicated to import and assembly of proteins into a specific compartment.     

ADP-ATP carrier of Saccharomyces cerevisiae contains a mitochondrial import signal between amino acids 72 and 111

The ADP-ATP carrier (also referred to as the adenine nucleotide translocator) of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is encoded by a nuclear gene, translated in the cytosol, and imported into the mitochondrial inner membrane. In order to study the determinants of mitochondrial import, a series of fusion proteins, consisting of the first 21, 72, and 111 amino acids of the ADP-ATP carrier, joined to mouse dihydrofolate reductase were generated. Dihydrofate reductase is a cytoslic protein that does not bind mitochondria. The reticulocyte lysate reaction containing the 35S-methionine-labeled protein was incubated with mitochondria in a buffer containing 3% BSA. Following incubation for import, the reactions were treated with 1 mM PMSF or 25 micrograms/ml proteinase K; mitochondria were reisolated and analyzed by gel electrophoresis. The 21 and 72 amino acid hybrid proteins showed a low level of binding to mitochondria: the bound form was entirely protease accessible. The 111 amino acid hybrid protein was imported to a protease-protected location within mitochondria. It is concluded that the first 72 amino acids of the ADP-ATP carrier do not suffice to import the protein into mitochondria and that the region between amino acids 72 and 111, a region that contains a transmembrane-spanning domain, constitutes at least part of the mitochondrial import signal.     

The presequence of fumarase is exposed to the cytosol during import into mitochondria

The majority of mitochondrial proteins can be imported into mitochondria following termination of their translation in the cytosol. Import of fumarase and several other proteins into mitochondria does not appear to occur post-translationally according to standard in vivo and in vitro assays. However, the nature of interaction between the translation and translocation apparatuses during import of these proteins is unknown. Therefore, a major question is whether the nascent chains of these proteins are exposed to the cytosol during import into mitochondria. We asked directly if the presequence of fumarase can be cleaved by externally added mitochondrial processing peptidase (MPP) during import, using an in vitro translation-translocation coupled reaction. The presequence of fumarase was cleaved by externally added MPP during import, indicating a lack of, or a loose physical connection between, the translation and translocation of this protein. Exchanging the authentic presequence of fumarase for that of the more efficient Su9-ATPase presequence reduced the exposure of fumarase precursors to externally added MPP en route to mitochondria. Therefore, exposure to cytosolic MPP is dependent on the presequence and not on the mature part of fumarase. On the other hand, following translation in the absence of mitochondria, the authentic fumarase presequence and that of Su9-ATPase become inaccessible to added MPP when attached to mature fumarase. Thus, folding of the mature portion of fumarase, which conceals the presequence, is the reason for its inability to be imported in classical post-translational assays. Another unique feature of fumarase is its distribution between the mitochondria and the cytosol. We show that in vivo the switch of the authentic presequence with that of Su9-ATPase caused more fumarase molecules to be localized to the mitochondria. A possible mechanism by which the cytosolic exposure, the targeting efficiency, and the subcellular distribution of fumarase are dictated by the presequence is discussed.     

Alternative topogenesis of Mgm1 and mitochondrial morphology depend on ATP and a functional import motor

Mitochondrial morphology and inheritance of mitochondrial DNA in yeast depend on the dynamin-like GTPase Mgm1. It is present in two isoforms in the intermembrane space of mitochondria both of which are required for Mgm1 function. Limited proteolysis of the large isoform by the mitochondrial rhomboid protease Pcp1/Rbd1 generates the short isoform of Mgm1 but how this is regulated is unclear. We show that near its NH2 terminus Mgm1 contains two conserved hydrophobic segments of which the more COOH-terminal one is cleaved by Pcp1. Changing the hydrophobicity of the NH2-terminal segment modulated the ratio of the isoforms and led to fragmentation of mitochondria. Formation of the short isoform of Mgm1 and mitochondrial morphology further depend on a functional protein import motor and on the ATP level in the matrix. Our data show that a novel pathway, to which we refer as alternative topogenesis, represents a key regulatory mechanism ensuring the balanced formation of both Mgm1 isoforms. Through this process the mitochondrial ATP level might control mitochondrial morphology.     

In vivo study in Trypanosoma brucei links mitochondrial transfer RNA import to mitochondrial protein import

Trypanosoma brucei imports all mitochondrial transfer RNAs (tRNAs) from the cytosol. By using cell lines that allow independent tetracycline-inducible RNA interference and isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside-inducible expression of a tagged tRNA, we show that ablation of Tim17 and mitochondrial heat-shock protein 70, components of the inner-membrane protein translocation machinery, strongly inhibits import of newly synthesized tRNAs. These findings, together with previous results in yeast and plants, suggest that the requirement for mitochondrial protein-import factors might be a conserved feature of mitochondrial tRNA import in all systems.     

Comparison of the TIM and TOM channel activities of the mitochondrial protein import complexes

Water-filled channels are central to the process of translocating proteins since they provide aqueous pathways through the hydrophobic environment of membranes. The Tom and Tim complexes translocate precursors across the mitochondrial outer and inner membranes, respectively, and contain channels referred to as TOM and TIM (previously called PSC and MCC). In this study, little differences were revealed from a direct comparison of the single channel properties of the TOM and TIM channels of yeast mitochondria. As they perform similar functions in translocating proteins across membranes, it is not surprising that both channels are high conductance, voltage-dependent channels that are slightly cation selective. Reconstituted TIM and TOM channel activities are not modified by deletion of the outer membrane channel VDAC, but are similarly affected by signal sequence peptides.     

The J-related segment of tim44 is essential for cell viability: a mutant Tim44 remains in the mitochondrial import site, but inefficiently recruits mtHsp70 and impairs protein translocation.

Tim44 is a protein of the mitochondrial inner membrane and serves as an adaptor protein for mtHsp70 that drives the import of preproteins in an ATP-dependent manner. In this study we have modified the interaction of Tim44 with mtHsp70 and characterized the consequences for protein translocation. By deletion of an 18-residue segment of Tim44 with limited similarity to J-proteins, the binding of Tim44 to mtHsp70 was weakened. We found that in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae the deletion of this segment is lethal. To investigate the role of the 18-residue segment, we expressed Tim44Delta18 in addition to the endogenous wild-type Tim44. Tim44Delta18 is correctly targeted to mitochondria and assembles in the inner membrane import site. The coexpression of Tim44Delta18 together with wild-type Tim44, however, does not stimulate protein import, but reduces its efficiency. In particular, the promotion of unfolding of preproteins during translocation is inhibited. mtHsp70 is still able to bind to Tim44Delta18 in an ATP-regulated manner, but the efficiency of interaction is reduced. These results suggest that the J-related segment of Tim44 is needed for productive interaction with mtHsp70. The efficient cooperation of mtHsp70 with Tim44 facilitates the translocation of loosely folded preproteins and plays a crucial role in the import of preproteins which contain a tightly folded domain.     

Studies on the topology of the protein import channel in relation to the plant mitochondrial processing peptidase integrated into the cytochrome bc1 complex

The mitochondrial processing peptidase (MPP) specifically cleaves N-terminal targeting signals from hundreds of nuclear-encoded, matrix-targeted precursor proteins. In contrast to yeast and mammals, the plant MPP is an integral component of the respiratory cytochrome bc1 complex. The topology of the protein import channel in relation to MPP/bc1 in plants was studied using chimeric precursors containing truncated cytochrome b2 (cyt b2) proteins of 55-167 residues in length, fused to dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR). The DHFR domain could be tightly folded by methotrexate (MTX), generating translocation intermediates trapped in the import channel with only the cyt b2 pre-sequence/mature domain protruding into the matrix. Spinach and soybean mitochondria imported and processed unfolded precursors. MTX-folded intermediates were not processed in spinach but the longest (1-167) MTX-folded cyt b2-DHFR construct was processed in soybean, while yeast mitochondria successfully processed even shorter MTX-folded constructs. The MTX-folded precursors were cleaved with high efficiency by purified spinach MPP/bc1 complex. We interpret these results as indicating that the protein import channel is located distantly from the MPP/bc1 complex in plants, and that there is no link between protein translocation and protein processing.     

L and D presequence peptides derived from the precursor of F1β subunit of the ATP synthase inhibit mitochondrial protein import by interaction with import machinery

We investigated the effect of L and D enantiomers of a 25-residue peptide derived from the N-terminal region of the presequence of Nicotiana plumbaginifolia F₁ subunit of the ATP synthase, pF₁(1, 25), on import into spinach leaf mitochondria. Three in vitro synthesized precursor proteins using different import pathways were used. Import of the precursor proteins of F₁ subunit of the ATP synthase, pre-F₁, and the alternative oxidase, pre-AOX, required addition of external ATP, whereas the chimeric precursor containing the N-terminal 84 amino acids of the cytochrome b ₂ precursor protein linked to dihydrofolate reductase, pre-b ₂(1, 84)-DHFR was not dependent on ATP. Import of pre-F₁, and pre-AOX was inhibited already at 1 M and 3 M concentration of the L and D enantiomers, whereas inhibition of import of pre-b ₂(1, 84)-DHFR, occurred at concentrations >10 M of both enantiomers. Binding efficiency of the precursor proteins was not affected by addition of the L and D enantiomers. There was no correlation between inhibition of import of pre-F₁ and pre-AOX and dissipation of membrane potential measured as a decrease of Rhodamine 123 fluorescence quenching. The inhibitory effect of the L and D presequence enantiomers on import of pre-F₁ and pre-AOX was concluded to occur within the outer membrane translocase machinery beyond the initial precursor receptor interaction. Furthermore, the fact that the D enantiomer had the same effect as the natural peptide showed that interaction of the presequence with the import machinery was not dependent on chiral properties of the presequence.     

Novel mitochondrial intermembrane space proteins as substrates of the MIA import pathway

Mitochondria consist of four compartments, the outer membrane, intermembrane space (IMS), inner membrane and the matrix. Most mitochondrial proteins are synthesized as precursors in the cytosol and have to be imported into these compartments. While the protein import machineries of the outer membrane, inner membrane and matrix have been investigated in detail, a specific mitochondrial machinery for import and assembly of IMS proteins, termed MIA, was identified only recently. To date, only a very small number of substrate proteins of the MIA pathway have been identified. The substrates contain characteristic cysteine motifs, either a twin Cx(3)C or a twin Cx(9)C motif. The largest MIA substrates known possess a molecular mass of 11 kDa, implying that this new import pathway has a very small size limit. Here, we have compiled a list of Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteins with a twin Cx(9)C motif and identified three IMS proteins that were previously localized to incorrect cellular compartments by tagging approaches. Mdm35, Mic14 (YDR031w) and Mic17 (YMR002w) require the two essential subunits, Mia40 and Erv1, of the MIA machinery for their localization in the mitochondrial IMS. With a molecular mass of 14 kDa and 17 kDa, respectively, Mic14 and Mic17 are larger than the known MIA substrates. Remarkably, the precursor of Erv1 itself is imported via the MIA pathway. As Erv1 has a molecular mass of 22 kDa and a twin Cx(2)C motif, this study demonstrates that the MIA pathway can transport substrates that are twice as large as the substrates known to date and is not limited to proteins with twin Cx(3)C or Cx(9)C motifs. However, tagging of MIA substrates can interfere with their subcellular localization, indicating that the proper localization of mitochondrial IMS proteins requires the characterization of the authentic untagged proteins.     

The role of Tim9p in the assembly of the TIM22 import complexes

Tim9p is located in the soluble 70-kDa Tim9p–Tim10p complex and the 300-kDa membrane complex in the mitochondrial TIM22 protein import system, which mediates the import of inner membrane proteins. From a collection of temperature-sensitive mutants, we have analyzed two in detail. tim9–3 contained two mutations and tim9–19 contained one mutation, all located near the 'twin CX₃C' motif that is conserved in the small Tim proteins. As a result, the import components in the tim9–3 mutant mitochondria were severely reduced and assembled into complexes of aberrant sizes. Protein import was severely reduced and Tim9p and Tim10p binding to in vitro imported ADP/ATP carrier was impaired. In the tim9–19 mutant mitochondria, the 300-kDa membrane complex was assembled, although the soluble 70-kDa Tim9p–Tim10p complex was not detectable. Protein import was decreased only two-fold. When coexpressed in Escherichia coli , tim9–19 and TIM10 proteins failed to assemble into a 70-kDa complex. Our findings suggest that residues near the 'twin CX₃C' motif are important for the assembly of Tim9p in both the Tim9p–Tim10p complex and the 300-kDa membrane complex.     

Cryo-electron microscopy structure of a yeast mitochondrial preprotein translocase

The translocase of the outer mitochondrial membrane (TOM) complex is the main entry gate for proteins imported into mitochondria. We determined the structure of the native, unstained ∼ 550-kDa core-Tom20 complex from Saccharomycescerevisiae by cryo-electron microscopy at 18-Å resolution. The complex is triangular, measuring 145 Å on edge, and has near-3-fold symmetry. Its bulk is made up of three globular ∼ 50-Å domains. Three elliptical pores on the c-face merge into one central ∼ 70-Å cavity with a cage-like assembly on the opposite t-face. Nitrilotriacetic acid-gold labeling indicates that three Tom22 subunits in the TOM complex are located at the perimeter of the complex near the interface of the globular domains. We assign Tom22, which controls complex assembly, to three peripheral protrusions on the c-face, while the Tom20 subunit is tentatively assigned to the central protrusion on this surface. Based on our three-dimensional map, we propose a model of transient interactions and functional dynamics of the TOM assembly.     

Biogenesis of mitochondria: dual role of Tom7 in modulating assembly of the preprotein translocase of the outer membrane

Biogenesis of the translocase of the outer mitochondrial membrane (TOM complex) involves the assembly of the central β-barrel forming protein Tom40 with six different subunits that are embedded in the membrane via α-helical transmembrane segments. The sorting and assembly machinery (SAM complex) of the outer membrane plays a central role in this process. The SAM complex mediates the membrane integration of β-barrel precursor proteins including Tom40. The small Tom proteins Tom5 and Tom6 associate with the precursor of Tom40 at the SAM complex at an early stage of the assembly process and play a stimulatory role in the formation of the mature TOM complex. A fraction of the SAM components interacts with the outer membrane protein mitochondrial distribution and morphology protein 10 (Mdm10) to form the SAM-Mdm10 machinery; however, different views exist on the function of the SAM-Mdm10 complex. We report here that the third small Tom protein, Tom7, plays an inhibitory role at two distinct steps in the biogenesis of the TOM complex. First, Tom7 plays an antagonistic role to Tom5 and Tom6 at the early stage of Tom40 assembly at the SAM complex. Second, Tom7 interacts with Mdm10 that is not bound to the SAM complex, and thus promotes dissociation of the SAM-Mdm10 complex. Since the SAM-Mdm10 complex is required for the biogenesis of Tom22, Tom7 delays the assembly of Tom22 with Tom40 at a late stage of assembly of the TOM complex. Thus, Tom7 modulates the biogenesis of topologically different proteins, the β-barrel forming protein Tom40 and Tom22 that contains a transmembrane α-helix.     

The mitochondrial intermembrane space: the most constricted mitochondrial sub-compartment with the largest variety of protein import pathways

The mitochondrial intermembrane space (IMS) is the most constricted sub-mitochondrial compartment, housing only about 5% of the mitochondrial proteome, and yet is endowed with the largest variability of protein import mechanisms. In this review, we summarize our current knowledge of the major IMS import pathway based on the oxidative protein folding pathway and discuss the stunning variability of other IMS protein import pathways. As IMS-localized proteins only have to cross the outer mitochondrial membrane, they do not require energy sources like ATP hydrolysis in the mitochondrial matrix or the inner membrane electrochemical potential which are critical for import into the matrix or insertion into the inner membrane. We also explore several atypical IMS import pathways that are still not very well understood and are guided by poorly defined or completely unknown targeting peptides. Importantly, many of the IMS proteins are linked to several human diseases, and it is therefore crucial to understand how they reach their normal site of function in the IMS. In the final part of this review, we discuss current understanding of how such IMS protein underpin a large spectrum of human disorders.     

The protein import machinery of the mitochondrial membranes

Mitochondria are surrounded by two membranes that contain independent and non-related protein transport machineries. Remarkable progress was recently achieved in elucidating the structure of the outer membrane import channel and in the identification of new components involved in protein traffic across the intermembrane space and the inner membrane. Traditional concepts of protein targeting and sorting had to be revised. Here we briefly summarize the data on the mitochondrial protein import system with particular emphasis on new developments and perspectives.