Cytoplasmic Nucleation and Atypical Branching Nucleation Generate Endoplasmic Microtubules in Physcomitrella patens

The mechanism underlying microtubule (MT) generation in plants has been primarily studied using the cortical MT array, in which fixed-angled branching nucleation and katanin-dependent MT severing predominate. However, little is known about MT generation in the endoplasm. Here, we explored the mechanism of endoplasmic MT generation in protonemal cells of Physcomitrella patens. We developed an assay that utilizes flow cell and oblique illumination fluorescence microscopy, which allowed visualization and quantification of individual MT dynamics. MT severing was infrequently observed, and disruption of katanin did not severely affect MT generation. Branching nucleation was observed, but it showed markedly variable branch angles and was occasionally accompanied by the transport of nucleated MTs. Cytoplasmic nucleation at seemingly random locations was most frequently observed and predominated when depolymerized MTs were regrown. The MT nucleator γ-tubulin was detected at the majority of the nucleation sites, at which a single MT was generated in random directions. When γ-tubulin was knocked down, MT generation was significantly delayed in the regrowth assay. However, nucleation occurred at a normal frequency in steady state, suggesting the presence of a γ-tubulin-independent backup mechanism. Thus, endoplasmic MTs in this cell type are generated in a less ordered manner, showing a broader spectrum of nucleation mechanisms in plants.     

Kinesins Have a Dual Function in Organizing Microtubules during Both Tip Growth and Cytokinesis in Physcomitrella patens

Microtubules (MTs) play a crucial role in the anisotropic deposition of cell wall material, thereby affecting the direction of growth. A wide range of tip-growing cells display highly polarized cell growth, and MTs have been implicated in regulating directionality and expansion. However, the molecular machinery underlying MT dynamics in tip-growing plant cells remains unclear. Here, we show that highly dynamic MT bundles form cyclically in the polarized expansion zone of the moss Physcomitrella patens caulonemal cells through the coalescence of growing MT plus ends. Furthermore, the plant-specific kinesins (KINID1) that are is essential for the proper MT organization at cytokinesis also regulate the turnover of the tip MT bundles as well as the directionality and rate of cell growth. The plus ends of MTs grow toward the expansion zone, and KINID1 is necessary for the stability of a single coherent focus of MTs in the center of the zone, whose formation coincides with the accumulation of KINID1. We propose that KINID-dependent MT bundling is essential for the correct directionality of growth as well as for promoting growth per se. Our findings indicate that two localized cell wall deposition processes, tip growth and cytokinesis, previously believed to be functionally and evolutionarily distinct, share common and plant-specific MT regulatory components.     

Xyloglucan Deficiency Disrupts Microtubule Stability and Cellulose Biosynthesis in Arabidopsis,Altering Cell Growth and Morphogenesis

Xyloglucan constitutes most of the hemicellulose in eudicot primary cell walls and functions in cell wall structure and mechanics. Although Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) xxt1 xxt2 mutants lacking detectable xyloglucan are viable, they display growth defects that are suggestive of alterations in wall integrity. To probe the mechanisms underlying these defects, we analyzed cellulose arrangement, microtubule patterning and dynamics, microtubule- and wall-integrity-related gene expression, and cellulose biosynthesis in xxt1 xxt2 plants. We found that cellulose is highly aligned in xxt1 xxt2 cell walls, that its three-dimensional distribution is altered, and that microtubule patterning and stability are aberrant in etiolated xxt1 xxt2 hypocotyls. We also found that the expression levels of microtubule-associated genes, such as MAP70-5 and CLASP, and receptor genes, such as HERK1 and WAK1, were changed in xxt1 xxt2 plants and that cellulose synthase motility is reduced in xxt1 xxt2 cells, corresponding with a reduction in cellulose content. Our results indicate that loss of xyloglucan affects both the stability of the microtubule cytoskeleton and the production and patterning of cellulose in primary cell walls. These findings establish, to our knowledge, new links between wall integrity, cytoskeletal dynamics, and wall synthesis in the regulation of plant morphogenesis.The primary walls of growing plant cells are largely constructed of cellulose and noncellulosic matrix polysaccharides that include hemicelluloses and pectins (Carpita and Gibeaut, 1993; Somerville et al., 2004; Cosgrove, 2005). Xyloglucan (XyG) is the most abundant hemicellulose in the primary walls of eudicots and is composed of a β-1,4-glucan backbone with side chains containing Xyl, Gal, and Fuc (Park and Cosgrove, 2015). XyG is synthesized in the Golgi apparatus before being secreted to the apoplast, and its biosynthesis requires several glycosyltransferases, including β-1,4-glucosyltransferase, α-1,6-xylosyltransferase, β-1,2-galactosyltransferase, and α-1,2-fucosyltransferase activities (Zabotina, 2012). Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) XYLOGLUCAN XYLOSYLTRANSFERASE1 (XXT1) and XXT2 display xylosyltransferase activity in vitro (Faik et al., 2002; Cavalier and Keegstra, 2006), and strikingly, no XyG is detectable in the walls of xxt1 xxt2 double mutants (Cavalier et al., 2008; Park and Cosgrove, 2012a), suggesting that the activity of XXT1 and XXT2 are required for XyG synthesis, delivery, and/or stability.Much attention has been paid to the interactions between cellulose and XyG over the past 40 years. Currently, there are several hypotheses concerning the nature of these interactions (Park and Cosgrove, 2015). One possibility is that XyGs bind directly to cellulose microfibrils (CMFs). Recent data indicating that crystalline cellulose cores are surrounded with hemicelluloses support this hypothesis (Dick-Pérez et al., 2011). It is also possible that XyG acts as a spacer-molecule to prevent CMFs from aggregating in cell walls (Anderson et al., 2010) or as an adapter to link cellulose with other cell wall components, such as pectin (Cosgrove, 2005; Cavalier et al., 2008). XyG can be covalently linked to pectin (Thompson and Fry, 2000; Popper and Fry, 2005, 2008), and NMR data demonstrate that pectins and cellulose might interact to a greater extent than XyG and cellulose in native walls (Dick-Pérez et al., 2011). Alternative models exist for how XyG-cellulose interactions influence primary wall architecture and mechanics. One such model posits that XyG chains act as load-bearing tethers that bind to CMFs in primary cell walls to form a cellulose-XyG network (Carpita and Gibeaut, 1993; Pauly et al., 1999; Somerville et al., 2004; Cosgrove, 2005). However, results have been accumulating against this tethered network model, leading to an alternative model in which CMFs make direct contact, in some cases mediated by a monolayer of xyloglucan, at limited cell wall sites dubbed “biomechanical hotspots,” which are envisioned as the key sites of cell wall loosening during cell growth (Park and Cosgrove, 2012a; Wang et al., 2013; Park and Cosgrove, 2015). Further molecular, biochemical, and microscopy experiments are required to help distinguish which aspects of the load-bearing, spacer/plasticizer, and/or hotspot models most accurately describe the functions of XyG in primary walls.Cortical microtubules (MTs) direct CMF deposition by guiding cellulose synthase complexes in the plasma membrane (Baskin et al., 2004; Paredez et al., 2006; Emons et al., 2007; Sánchez-Rodriguez et al., 2012), and the patterned deposition of cellulose in the wall in turn can help determine plant cell anisotropic growth and morphogenesis (Baskin, 2005). Disruption of cortical MTs by oryzalin, a MT-depolymerizing drug, alters the alignment of CMFs, suggesting that MTs contribute to CMF organization (Baskin et al., 2004). CELLULOSE SYNTHASE (CESA) genes, including CESA1, CESA3, and CESA6, are required for normal CMF synthesis in primary cell walls (Kohorn et al., 2006; Desprez et al., 2007), and accessory proteins such as COBRA function in cellulose production (Lally et al., 2001). Live-cell imaging from double-labeled YFP-CESA6; CFP-ALPHA-1 TUBULIN (TUA1) Arabidopsis seedlings provides direct evidence that cortical MTs determine the trajectories of cellulose synthesis complexes (CSCs) and patterns of cellulose deposition (Paredez et al., 2006). Additionally, MT organization affects the rotation of cellulose synthase trajectories in the epidermal cells of Arabidopsis hypocotyls (Chan et al., 2010). Recently, additional evidence for direct guidance of CSCs by MTs has been provided by the identification of CSI1/POM2, which binds to both MTs and CESAs (Bringmann et al., 2012; Li et al., 2012). MICROTUBULE ORGANIZATION1 (MOR1) is essential for cortical MT organization (Whittington et al., 2001), but disruption of cortical MTs in the mor1 mutant does not greatly affect CMF organization (Sugimoto et al., 2003), and oryzalin treatment does not abolish CSC motility (Paredez et al., 2006).Conversely, the organization of cortical MTs can be affected by cellulose synthesis. Treatment with isoxaben, a cellulose synthesis inhibitor, results in disorganized cortical MTs in tobacco cells, suggesting that inhibition of cellulose synthesis affects MT organization (Fisher and Cyr, 1998), and treatment with 2,6-dichlorobenzonitrile, another cellulose synthesis inhibitor, alters MT organization in mor1 plants (Himmelspach et al., 2003). Cortical MT orientation in Arabidopsis roots is also altered in two cellulose synthesis-deficient mutants, CESA6^52-isx and kor1-3, suggesting that CSC activity can affect MT arrays (Paredez et al., 2008). Together, these results point to a bidirectional relationship between cellulose synthesis/patterning and MT organization.MTs influence plant organ morphology, but the detailed mechanisms by which they do so are incompletely understood. The dynamics and stability of cortical MTs are also affected by MT-associated proteins (MAPs). MAP18 is a MT destabilizing protein that depolymerizes MTs (Wang et al., 2007), MAP65-1 functions as a MT crosslinker, and MAP70-1 functions in MT assembly (Korolev et al., 2005; Lucas et al., 2011). MAP70-5 stabilizes existing MTs to maintain their length, and its overexpression induces right-handed helical growth (Korolev et al., 2007); likewise, MAP20 overexpression results in helical cell twisting (Rajangam et al., 2008). CLASP promotes microtubule stability, and its mutant is hypersensitive to microtubule-destabilizing drug oryzalin (Ambrose et al., 2007). KATANIN1 (KTN1) is a MT-severing protein that can sever MTs into short fragments and promote the formation of thick MT bundles that ultimately depolymerize (Stoppin-Mellet et al., 2006), and loss of KTN1 function results in reduced responses to mechanical stress (Uyttewaal et al., 2012). In general, cortical MT orientation responds to mechanical signals and can be altered by applying force directly to the shoot apical meristem (Hamant et al., 2008). The application of external mechanical pressure to Arabidopsis leaves also triggers MT bundling (Jacques et al., 2013). Kinesins, including KINESIN-13A (KIN-13A) and FRAGILE FIBER1 (FRA1), have been implicated in cell wall synthesis (Cheung and Wu, 2011; Fujikura et al., 2014). The identification of cell wall receptors and sensors is beginning to reveal how plant cell walls sense and respond to external signals (Humphrey et al., 2007; Ringli, 2010); some of them, such as FEI1, FEI2, THESEUS1 (THE1), FERONIA (FER), HERCULES RECEPTOR KINASE1 (HERK1), WALL ASSOCIATED KINASE1 (WAK1), WAK2, and WAK4, have been characterized (Lally et al., 2001; Decreux and Messiaen, 2005; Kohorn et al., 2006; Xu et al., 2008; Guo et al., 2009; Cheung and Wu, 2011). However, the relationships between wall integrity, cytoskeletal dynamics, and wall synthesis have not yet been fully elucidated.In this study, we analyzed CMF patterning, MT patterning and dynamics, and cellulose biosynthesis in the Arabidopsis xxt1 xxt2 double mutant that lacks detectable XyG and displays altered growth (Cavalier et al., 2008; Park and Cosgrove, 2012a). To investigate whether and how XyG deficiency affects the organization of CMFs and cortical MTs, we observed CMF patterning in xxt1 xxt2 mutants and Col (wild-type) controls using atomic force microscopy (AFM), field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and confocal microscopy (Hodick and Kutschera, 1992; Derbyshire et al., 2007; Anderson et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2014). We also generated transgenic Col and xxt1 xxt2 lines expressing GFP-MAP4 (Marc et al., 1998) and GFP-CESA3 (Desprez et al., 2007), and analyzed MT arrays and cellulose synthesis using live-cell imaging. Our results show that the organization of CMFs is altered, that MTs in xxt1 xxt2 mutants are aberrantly organized and are more sensitive to external mechanical pressure and the MT-depolymerizing drug oryzalin, and that cellulose synthase motility and cellulose content are decreased in xxt1 xxt2 mutants. Furthermore, real-time quantitative RT-PCR measurements indicate that the enhanced sensitivity of cortical MTs to mechanical stress and oryzalin in xxt1 xxt2 plants might be due to altered expression of MT-stabilizing and wall receptor genes. Together, these data provide insights into the connections between the functions of XyG in wall assembly, the mechanical integrity of the cell wall, cytoskeleton-mediated cellular responses to deficiencies in wall biosynthesis, and cell and tissue morphogenesis.     

On the Inside

Cellulose synthase complexes (CSCs) at the plasma membrane (PM) are aligned with cortical microtubules (MTs) and direct the biosynthesis of cellulose. The mechanism of the interaction between CSCs and MTs, and the cellular determinants that control the delivery of CSCs at the PM, are not yet well understood. We identified a unique small molecule, CESA TRAFFICKING INHIBITOR (CESTRIN), which reduces cellulose content and alters the anisotropic growth of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) hypocotyls. We monitored the distribution and mobility of fluorescently labeled cellulose synthases (CESAs) in live Arabidopsis cells under chemical exposure to characterize their subcellular effects. CESTRIN reduces the velocity of PM CSCs and causes their accumulation in the cell cortex. The CSC-associated proteins KORRIGAN1 (KOR1) and POM2/CELLULOSE SYNTHASE INTERACTIVE PROTEIN1 (CSI1) were differentially affected by CESTRIN treatment, indicating different forms of association with the PM CSCs. KOR1 accumulated in bodies similar to CESA; however, POM2/CSI1 dissociated into the cytoplasm. In addition, MT stability was altered without direct inhibition of MT polymerization, suggesting a feedback mechanism caused by cellulose interference. The selectivity of CESTRIN was assessed using a variety of subcellular markers for which no morphological effect was observed. The association of CESAs with vesicles decorated by the trans-Golgi network-localized protein SYNTAXIN OF PLANTS61 (SYP61) was increased under CESTRIN treatment, implicating SYP61 compartments in CESA trafficking. The properties of CESTRIN compared with known CESA inhibitors afford unique avenues to study and understand the mechanism under which PM-associated CSCs are maintained and interact with MTs and to dissect their trafficking routes in etiolated hypocotyls.Plant cell expansion and anisotropic cell growth are driven by vacuolar turgor pressure and cell wall extensibility, which in a dynamic and restrictive manner direct cell morphogenesis (Baskin, 2005). Cellulose is the major load-bearing component of the cell wall and is thus a major determinant for anisotropic growth (Baskin, 2001). Cellulose is made up of β-1,4-linked glucan chains that may aggregate to form microfibrils holding 18 to 36 chains (Somerville, 2006; Fernandes et al., 2011; Jarvis, 2013; Newman et al., 2013; Thomas et al., 2013). In contrast to cell wall structural polysaccharides, including pectin and hemicellulose, which are synthesized by Golgi-localized enzymes, cellulose is synthesized at the plasma membrane (PM) by cellulose synthase complexes (CSCs; Somerville, 2006; Scheller and Ulvskov, 2010; Atmodjo et al., 2013). The cellulose synthases (CESAs) are the principal catalytic units of cellulose biosynthesis and in higher plants are organized into globular rosettes (Haigler and Brown, 1986). For their biosynthetic function, each primary cell wall CSC requires a minimum of three catalytic CESA proteins (Desprez et al., 2007; Persson et al., 2007).On the basis of observations that cellulose microfibrils align with cortical microtubules (MTs) and that MT disruption leads to a loss of cell expansion, it was hypothesized that cortical MTs guide the deposition and, therefore, the orientation of cellulose (Green, 1962; Ledbetter and Porter, 1963; Baskin, 2001; Bichet et al., 2001; Sugimoto et al., 2003; Baskin et al., 2004; Wasteneys and Fujita, 2006). Confocal microscopy of CESA fluorescent fusions has advanced our understanding of CESA trafficking and dynamics. CSCs are visualized as small particles moving within the plane of the PM, with an average velocity of approximately 200 to 400 nm min⁻¹. Their movement in linear tracks along cortical MTs (Paredez et al., 2006) supports the MT-cellulose alignment hypothesis.Our current understanding of cellulose synthesis suggests that CESAs are assembled into CSCs in either the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) or the Golgi apparatus and trafficked by vesicles to the PM (Bashline et al., 2014; McFarlane et al., 2014). The presence of CESAs in isolated Golgi and vesicles from the trans-Golgi network (TGN) has been established by proteomic studies (Dunkley et al., 2006; Drakakaki et al., 2012; Nikolovski et al., 2012; Parsons et al., 2012; Groen et al., 2014). Their localization at the TGN has been corroborated by electron microscopy and colocalization with TGN markers, such as vacuolar H⁺-ATP synthase subunit a1 (VHA-a1), and the Soluble NSF Attachment Protein Receptor (SNARE) protein SYNTAXIN OF PLANTS41 (SYP41), SYP42, and SYP61 (Crowell et al., 2009; Gutierrez et al., 2009; Drakakaki et al., 2012). A population of post-Golgi compartments carrying CSCs, referred to as microtubule-associated cellulose synthase compartments (MASCs) or small cellulose synthase compartments (SmaCCs), may be associated with MTs or actin filaments and are thought to be directly involved in either CSC delivery to, or internalization from, the PM (Crowell et al., 2009; Gutierrez et al., 2009).In addition to the CESAs, auxiliary proteins have been identified that play a vital role in the cellulose-synthesizing machinery. These include COBRA (Roudier et al., 2005), the endoglucanase KORRIGAN1 (KOR1; Lane et al., 2001; Lei et al., 2014b; Vain et al., 2014), and the recently identified POM-POM2/CELLULOSE SYNTHASE INTERACTIVE PROTEIN1 (POM2/CSI1; Gu et al., 2010; Bringmann et al., 2012). The latter protein functions as a linker between the cortical MTs and CSCs, as genetic lesions in POM2/CSI1 result in a lower incidence of coalignment between CSCs and cortical MTs (Bringmann et al., 2012). Given the highly regulated process of cellulose biosynthesis and deposition, it can be expected that many more accessory proteins participate in the delivery of CSCs and their interaction with MTs. Identification of these unique CSC-associated proteins can ultimately provide clues for the mechanisms behind cell growth and cell shape formation.Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) mutants with defects in the cellulose biosynthetic machinery exhibit a loss of anisotropic growth, which results in organ swelling. This phenotype may be used as a diagnostic tool in genetic screens to identify cellulose biosynthetic and CSC auxiliary proteins (Mutwil et al., 2008). Chemical inhibitors complement genetic lesions to perturb, study, and control the cellular and physiological function of proteins (Drakakaki et al., 2009). A plethora of bioactive small molecules have been identified, and their analytical use contributes to our understanding of cellulose biosynthesis and CESA subcellular behavior (for review, see Brabham and Debolt, 2012). Small molecule treatment can induce distinct characteristic subcellular CESA patterns that can be broadly grouped into three categories (Brabham and Debolt, 2012). The first is characterized by the depletion of CESAs from the PM and their accumulation in cytosolic compartments, as observed for the herbicide isoxaben {N-[3-(1-ethyl-1-methylpropyl)-5-isoxazolyl]-2,6-dimethyoxybenzamide}, CGA 325615 [1-cyclohexyl-5-(2,3,4,5,6-pentafluorophe-noxyl)-1λ4,2,4,6-thiatriazin-3-amine], thaxtomin A (4-nitroindol-3-yl containing 2,5-dioxopiperazine), AE F150944 [N2-(1-ethyl-3-phenylpropyl)-6-(1-fluoro-1-methylethyl)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-di-amine], and quinoxyphen [4-(2-bromo-4,5-dimethoxyphenyl)-3,4-dihydro-¹H-benzo-quinolin-2-one]; (Paredez et al., 2006; Bischoff et al., 2009; Crowell et al., 2009; Gutierrez et al., 2009; Harris et al., 2012). The second displays hyperaccumulation of CESAs at the PM, as seen for the herbicides dichlobenil (2,6-dichlorobenzonitrile) and indaziflam {N-[(1R,2S)-2,3-dihydro-2,6-dimethyl-¹H-inden-1-yl)-6-(1-fluoroethyl]-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamine} (Herth, 1987; DeBolt et al., 2007b; Brabham et al., 2014). The third exhibits disturbance of both CESAs and MTs and alters CESA trajectories at the PM, as exemplified by morlin (7-ethoxy-4-methylchromen-2-one; DeBolt et al., 2007a). Unique compounds inducing a phenotype combining CESA accumulation in intermediate compartments and disruption of CSC-MT interactions can contribute to both the identification of the accessory proteins linking CSCs with MTs and the vesicular delivery mechanisms of CESAs.In this study, we identified and characterized a unique cellulose deposition inhibitor, the small molecule CESA TRAFFICKING INHIBITOR (CESTRIN), which affects the localization pattern of CSCs and their interacting proteins in a unique way. The induction of cytoplasmic CESTRIN bodies might provide further clues for trafficking routes that carry CESAs to the PM.     

Affinity Purification and Characterization of Functional Tubulin from Cell Suspension Cultures of Arabidopsis and Tobacco

Microtubules assemble into several distinct arrays that play important roles in cell division and cell morphogenesis. To decipher the mechanisms that regulate the dynamics and organization of this versatile cytoskeletal component, it is essential to establish in vitro assays that use functional tubulin. Although plant tubulin has been purified previously from protoplasts by reversible taxol-induced polymerization, a simple and efficient purification method has yet to be developed. Here, we used a Tumor Overexpressed Gene (TOG) column, in which the tubulin-binding domains of a yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) TOG homolog are immobilized on resin, to isolate functional plant tubulin. We found that several hundred micrograms of pure tubulin can readily be purified from cell suspension cultures of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) and Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). The tubulin purified by the TOG column showed high assembly competence, partly because of low levels of polymerization-inhibitory phosphorylation of α-tubulin. Compared with porcine brain tubulin, Arabidopsis tubulin is highly dynamic in vitro at both the plus and minus ends, exhibiting faster shrinkage rates and more frequent catastrophe events, and exhibits frequent spontaneous nucleation. Furthermore, our study shows that an internal histidine tag in α-tubulin can be used to prepare particular isotypes and specifically engineered versions of α-tubulin. In contrast to previous studies of plant tubulin, our mass spectrometry and immunoblot analyses failed to detect posttranslational modification of the isolated Arabidopsis tubulin or detected only low levels of posttranslational modification. This novel technology can be used to prepare assembly-competent, highly dynamic pure tubulin from plant cell cultures.Microtubules (MTs) are important cytoskeletal polymers that are conserved in eukaryotic cells and are assembled from α- and β-tubulin heterodimers (Desai and Mitchison, 1997). In plants, MTs have important functions in essential cellular processes, such as cell division, and in cell morphogenesis. MTs in plant cells adopt several distinct higher order arrays and are remodeled in response to the cell cycle, developmental programs, and environmental cues (Hashimoto, 2015). Genetic, molecular, and cell biological approaches have been used to identify cellular factors that regulate the organization and dynamics of plant MTs. Considerable effort has been devoted to simulating the organization of cortical MT arrays by computational modeling.Cell-free in vitro studies are essential for the biochemical characterization of various MT regulators and for elucidating the mechanistic principles underlying the versatility of this dynamic polymer in cellular functions. The purification of sufficient amounts of assembly-competent tubulin is a prerequisite for these in vitro studies. Tubulin is traditionally purified from mammalian brains, since these tissues contain sufficiently high concentrations of tubulin to allow MT assembly in crude cell extracts. Polymerized MTs and their associated MT-binding proteins are separated from other cellular proteins by sedimentation. Pelleted MTs are then depolymerized upon drug washout under MT-destabilizing conditions, such as high concentrations of salt and calcium and low temperature. A few rounds of assembly-disassembly cycles highly enrich for tubulin and copurify MT-associated proteins, which can subsequently be removed by column chromatography (Borisy et al., 1975). Tubulin has also been purified from several plant sources (Morejohn and Fosket, 1982; Mizuno, 1985; Jiang et al., 1992; Bokros et al., 1993; Moore et al., 1997). However, since tubulin concentrations are low in plant cells, taxol, which stabilizes MTs, is generally included in the polymerization buffer, and cytoplasm-rich miniprotoplasts, which lack vacuoles, are sometimes used as starting material (Hamada et al., 2013). Since it is technically challenging to isolate assembly-competent pure tubulin from nonneural sources (Sackett et al., 2010), general plant science laboratories may hesitate to prepare plant tubulin themselves.Although the primary amino acid sequences of eukaryotic tubulins are fairly well conserved and the biophysical mechanisms of MT assembly and disassembly are thought to be similar for all MTs, the kinetics of MT dynamic instability differ for MTs assembled from animal and plant tubulin (Moore et al., 1997). Interactions with MT-interacting proteins may differ for tubulins isolated from different biological sources, as reported for the MT-dependent activation of kinesin (Alonso et al., 2007). Posttranslational modifications of tubulin, which generate distinct tubulin signatures and may modulate the functions of MT-interacting proteins, such as kinesin (Sirajuddin et al., 2014), are extensive in brain tubulin (Janke, 2014) but may be quantitatively and qualitatively different in plant tubulin. Furthermore, MT nucleation by the γ-tubulin ring complex shows a strong preference for tubulin from the same species (Kollman et al., 2015). Thus, it is important to use plant tubulin, and not brain tubulin, for in vitro studies of plant MTs.Tubulin is folded by a series of molecular chaperones to form an αβ-tubulin heterodimer in which one structural GTP is embedded in the interdimer interface (Lundin et al., 2010). The requirement of these eukaryote-specific chaperones precludes the use of prokaryotic expression systems for synthesizing properly folded and functional tubulin. Bacterially synthesized tubulin can be folded in rabbit reticulocyte lysate to produce functional tubulin, but with moderate yields (Shah et al., 2001). A yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) expression system has been developed to produce modified yeast tubulin (Uchimura et al., 2006; Johnson et al., 2011), but this system is not suitable for the synthesis of animal (Sirajuddin et al., 2014) and plant (our unpublished data) tubulin. A baculovirus-insect cell expression system was recently reported to yield functional human tubulin (Minoura et al., 2013).Tubulin-binding proteins have been used to develop affinity-purification columns. The TOG domains (named after the human MT regulator, colonic and hepatic Tumor Overexpressed Gene [ch-TOG]) are among the best-characterized tubulin-binding domains. ch-TOG and orthologs from other eukaryotes bind to the growing plus ends of MTs and accelerate MT growth (Al-Bassam and Chang, 2011). TOG domains from the yeast ortholog Stu2 were recently used to affinity purify assembly-competent tubulin from fungal and animal sources (Widlund et al., 2012). In this study, we demonstrate that a TOG-based affinity column can be used to purify functional tubulin from tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) and Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). We examined the posttranslational modifications of the isolated tubulins by mass spectrometry and immunoblot analysis and showed that a His-tagged Arabidopsis tubulin isotype could be purified using this column. These results show that wild-type and recombinant functional tubulin from plant sources can be isolated efficiently.     

Phosphatidic Acid Regulates Microtubule Organization by Interacting with MAP65-1 in Response to Salt Stress in Arabidopsis

Membrane lipids play fundamental structural and regulatory roles in cell metabolism and signaling. Here, we report that phosphatidic acid (PA), a product of phospholipase D (PLD), regulates MAP65-1, a microtubule-associated protein, in response to salt stress. Knockout of the PLDα1 gene resulted in greater NaCl-induced disorganization of microtubules, which could not be recovered during or after removal of the stress. Salt affected the association of MAP65-1 with microtubules, leading to microtubule disorganization in pldα1cells, which was alleviated by exogenous PA. PA bound to MAP65-1, increasing its activity in enhancing microtubule polymerization and bundling. Overexpression of MAP65-1 improved salt tolerance of Arabidopsis thaliana cells. Mutations of eight amino acids in MAP65-1 led to the loss of its binding to PA, microtubule-bundling activity, and promotion of salt tolerance. The pldα1 map65-1 double mutant showed greater sensitivity to salt stress than did either single mutant. These results suggest that PLDα1-derived PA binds to MAP65-1, thus mediating microtubule stabilization and salt tolerance. The identification of MAP65-1 as a target of PA reveals a functional connection between membrane lipids and the cytoskeleton in environmental stress signaling.     

Distribution of Transglutaminase in Pear Pollen Tubes in Relation to Cytoskeleton and Membrane Dynamics

Transglutaminases (TGases) are ubiquitous enzymes that take part in a variety of cellular functions. In the pollen tube, cytoplasmic TGases are likely to be involved in the incorporation of primary amines at selected peptide-bound glutamine residues of cytosolic proteins (including actin and tubulin), while cell wall-associated TGases are believed to regulate pollen tube growth. Using immunological probes, we identified TGases associated with different subcellular compartments (cytosol, membranes, and cell walls). Binding of cytosolic TGase to actin filaments was shown to be Ca²⁺ dependent. The membrane TGase is likely associated with both Golgi-derived structures and the plasma membrane, suggesting a Golgi-based exocytotic delivery of TGase. Association of TGase with the plasma membrane was also confirmed by immunogold transmission electron microscopy. Immunolocalization of TGase indicated that the enzyme was present in the growing region of pollen tubes and that the enzyme colocalizes with cell wall markers. Bidimensional electrophoresis indicated that different TGase isoforms were present in distinct subcellular compartments, suggesting either different roles or different regulatory mechanisms of enzyme activity. The application of specific inhibitors showed that the distribution of TGase in different subcellular compartments was regulated by both membrane dynamics and cytoskeleton integrity, suggesting that delivery of TGase to the cell wall requires the transport of membranes along cytoskeleton filaments. Taken together, these data indicate that a cytoplasmic TGase interacts with the cytoskeleton, while a different TGase isoform, probably delivered via a membrane/cytoskeleton-based transport system, is secreted in the cell wall of pear (Pyrus communis) pollen tubes, where it might play a role in the regulation of apical growth.Transglutaminases (TGases [EC 2.3.2.13]; protein-Gln γ-glutamyltransferase) are a family of ubiquitous Ca²⁺-activated enzymes that are involved in animal cell morphogenesis and differentiation, apoptosis, cell death, inflammation, cell migration, and wound healing (Griffin et al., 2002; Mehta et al., 2006; Beninati et al., 2009). TGases are associated with different subcellular compartments, such as cytosol, plasma membrane, nucleus, mitochondria, and extracellular matrix. The specific localization of TGases is likely to determine both the biochemical activity and the type of proteins and/or substrates with which TGases react (Park et al., 2010). The distribution profile of TGase is affected by Ca²⁺, since the enzyme is preferentially associated with the lysosome compartment of liver cells in the absence of Ca²⁺ (Juprelle-Soret et al., 1984).TGase was initially detected in association with the cytosol, with the particulate (probably the microsomal) fraction (Birckbichler et al., 1976), and with the nucleus of animal cells (Remington and Russell, 1982). The association of TGase with the plasma membrane was related to its activity in promoting cell adhesion and to the interaction of cells with the extracellular matrix, while the presence of TGase in the nucleus is likely related to cell apoptosis (Griffin et al., 2002). How TGase is delivered to its final destination in animal cells remains to be clarified. Since the cytoskeleton is essential for the correct positioning of proteins in the cells, this interplay has often been studied in terms of potential substrates of TGase activity (Griffin et al., 2002). For example, the TGase-mediated incorporation of polyamines (PAs) stimulates actin polymerization (Takashi, 1988; Griffin et al., 2002). TGase was also found to associate with myosin in stress fibers of vascular smooth cells (Chowdhury et al., 1997). The association between TGase and microtubules (MTs) was initially studied in view of the importance of MTs in Alzheimer’s disease (Griffin et al., 2002), whereas the dynamics of MTs is also likely to be controlled by TGase (Al-Jallad et al., 2011). Interestingly, MTs are also a substrate of TGase activity in cells committed to apoptosis (Piredda et al., 1999). TGase was also shown to posttranslationally modify MT-associated proteins such as tau (Griffin et al., 2002).Information about the localization and function of TGases in plant cells is limited. Following the early evidence of an enzyme-based incorporation of PAs in plants (Serafini-Fracassini et al., 1988), a number of reports described the presence and role of TGase in nonphotosynthetic/photosynthetic tissues and in isolated chloroplasts (Serafini-Fracassini and Del Duca, 2008, and refs. therein). Attempts have also been made to examine the differences and similarities between plant and animal TGases. For example, a tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) TGase was proposed to be involved in the programmed cell death (PCD) of the flower corolla (Della Mea et al., 2007); in such a case, TGase is likely to be released into the cell wall by a Golgi vesicle-based transport. Plant TGases might also be involved in protection against viruses (Del Duca et al., 2007) and in the self-incompatibility (SI) response involving pollen and stigma during sexual reproduction (Del Duca et al., 2010). Recently, different TGase isoforms were detected in meristematic apices of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus) tuber sprouts (Beninati et al., 2013).The pollen tube is a widely investigated tip-growing plant cell (Lee and Yang, 2008). Studies are generally aimed at clarifying the many aspects related either to its growth or to rejection by the stigma/style. Early evidence for a role of PAs during pollen tube emergence (Bagni et al., 1981) was confirmed through the detection of PA binding via a Ca²⁺-activated TGase activity (Del Duca et al., 1997) and later by the identification of actin and tubulin as substrates of purified pollen TGase (Del Duca et al., 2009). In pollen, the enzyme affected the polymerization state and activity of actin filaments (AFs) and MTs (Del Duca et al., 2009) and existed as both soluble and cell wall associated (Di Sandro et al., 2010). Visualization of fluorescently labeled TGase products indicated that the cross-linking activity of TGase occurred at the apex of pollen tubes, in a basal region close to the pollen grain and within the pollen grain itself (Iorio et al., 2008). The enzyme was found as a soluble cytoplasmic form likely involved in the regulation of unspecified physiological processes (possibly associated with the cytoskeleton; Del Duca et al., 2009).Although the association of pollen TGases with organelles/vesicles has not been reported, an extracellular form of a Ca²⁺-dependent TGase was shown to be involved in pollen tube growth (likely as a modulator of cell wall building and strengthening). Moreover, pollen TGase was secreted in the incubation medium during germination, where it might catalyze the cross linking of PAs with secreted proteins (Di Sandro et al., 2010). This suggests that pollen TGase may be secreted through a vesicle-based mechanism. Finally, a TGase activity was also observed in planta, consistent with a possible role of TGase during tube migration through the style (Di Sandro et al., 2010) or in the SI response of pollen tubes (Del Duca et al., 2010).The pollen tube is an excellent model to study how a given plant protein is either secreted or delivered to its final destination. Although we know that actin and tubulin are substrates of TGase activity, and that the active enzyme is located in the cell wall and released outside, how TGase is distributed in the cells and how this process is dependent on cytoskeleton and membrane dynamics remain unknown. Here, we wanted to study in detail the localization and distribution of TGase in growing pollen tubes of pear (Pyrus communis) in relation to both cytoskeleton and membrane dynamics. The aim was to shed light on the mechanism by which TGase is transported and secreted, a process that is still not well understood even in animal cells. Specific antibodies that cross react with the TGase of pollen tubes were used to localize the enzyme in different membrane compartments and in the cell wall. The use of specific inhibitors indicated that the delivery of extracellular TGase is dependent on both AFs and membrane dynamics. Analysis by bidimensional electrophoresis (2-DE) showed that distinct TGase isoforms are associated with different cell compartments, suggesting that TGase might be differently regulated according to its position in the cell. Together, these data may contribute to our understanding of the mechanisms underlying pollen tube growth, an essential aspect of fertilization processes.     

Patterning and Lifetime of Plasma Membrane-Localized Cellulose Synthase Is Dependent on Actin Organization in Arabidopsis Interphase Cells

The actin and microtubule cytoskeletons regulate cell shape across phyla, from bacteria to metazoans. In organisms with cell walls, the wall acts as a primary constraint of shape, and generation of specific cell shape depends on cytoskeletal organization for wall deposition and/or cell expansion. In higher plants, cortical microtubules help to organize cell wall construction by positioning the delivery of cellulose synthase (CesA) complexes and guiding their trajectories to orient newly synthesized cellulose microfibrils. The actin cytoskeleton is required for normal distribution of CesAs to the plasma membrane, but more specific roles for actin in cell wall assembly and organization remain largely elusive. We show that the actin cytoskeleton functions to regulate the CesA delivery rate to, and lifetime of CesAs at, the plasma membrane, which affects cellulose production. Furthermore, quantitative image analyses revealed that actin organization affects CesA tracking behavior at the plasma membrane and that small CesA compartments were associated with the actin cytoskeleton. By contrast, localized insertion of CesAs adjacent to cortical microtubules was not affected by the actin organization. Hence, both actin and microtubule cytoskeletons play important roles in regulating CesA trafficking, cellulose deposition, and organization of cell wall biogenesis.Plant cells are surrounded by a flexible yet durable extracellular matrix that makes up the cell wall. This structure offers mechanical strength that counters osmotically driven turgor pressure, is an important factor for water movement in plants, acts as a physical barrier against pathogens (Somerville et al., 2004), and is a determining factor for plant cell morphogenesis. Hence, the cell wall plays a central role in plant biology.Two main types of cell walls can typically be distinguished: the primary and the secondary cell wall. The major load-bearing component in both of these cell walls is the β-1,4-linked glucan polymer cellulose (Somerville et al., 2004). Cellulose polymers are synthesized by plasma membrane (PM)-localized cellulose synthase (CesA) complexes (Mueller and Brown, 1980), which contain several CesA subunits with similar amino acid sequences (Mutwil et al., 2008a). The primary wall CesA complexes are believed to be assembled in the Golgi and are subsequently delivered to the PM via vesicular trafficking (Gutierrez et al., 2009), sometimes associated with Golgi pausing (Crowell et al., 2009). Furthermore, the primary wall CesA complexes are preferentially inserted into the PM at sites that coincide with cortical microtubules (MTs), which subsequently guide cellulose microfibril deposition (Gutierrez et al., 2009). Hence, the cortical MT array is a determinant for multiple aspects of primary wall cellulose production.The actin cytoskeleton plays a crucial role in organized deposition of cell wall polymers in many cell types, including cellulose-related polymers and pectins in tip-growing cells, such as pollen tubes and root hairs (Hu et al., 2003; Chen et al., 2007). Thus, actin-depolymerizing drugs and genetic manipulation of ACTIN genes impair directed expansion of tip-growing cells and long-distance transport of Golgi bodies with vesicles to growing regions (Ketelaar et al., 2003; Szymanski, 2005). In diffusely growing cells in roots and hypocotyls, loss of anisotropic growth has also been observed in response to mutations to vegetative ACTIN genes and to actin-depolymerizing and -stabilizing drugs (Baluska et al., 2001; Kandasamy et al., 2009). While actin is clearly important for cell wall assembly, it is less clear what precise roles it plays.One well-known function of actin in higher plants is to support intracellular movement of cytoplasmic organelles via actomyosin-based motility (Geisler et al., 2008; Szymanski, 2009). During primary wall synthesis in interphase cells, treatment with the actin assembly inhibitor latrunculin B (LatB) led to inhibition of Golgi motility and pronounced inhomogenities in CesA density at the PM (Crowell et al., 2009; Gutierrez et al., 2009) that coincided with the density of underlying and immobile Golgi bodies (Gutierrez et al., 2009). These results suggested that Golgi motility is important for CesA distribution (Gutierrez et al., 2009). The actin cytoskeleton also appears to be important for secondary wall cellulose microfibril deposition. For example, longitudinal actin filaments (AFs) define the movement of secondary wall CesA-containing Golgi bodies in developing xylem vessels (Wightman and Turner, 2008). In addition, it has been proposed that the AFs also can regulate the delivery of the secondary wall CesA complex to the PM via pausing of the Golgi (Wightman and Turner, 2008). It is therefore clear that actin organization is important for CesA distribution and for the pattern of cellulose microfibril deposition.Despite the above findings, very few reports have undertaken detailed studies to elucidate the role of the actin cytoskeleton in the distribution and trafficking of specific proteins in plant cells. Here, we have investigated the intracellular trafficking of CesA-containing vesicles and delivery of CesAs to the PM, in the context of the actin cytoskeleton. We quantitatively demonstrate that the organization of the actin cytoskeleton regulates CesA-containing Golgi distribution and the exocytic and endocytic rate of the CesAs. However, actin organization has no effect on the localized insertion of CesAs at sites of MTs at the PM.     

Noninvasive Evaluation of Heavy Metal Uptake and Storage in Micoralgae Using a Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer-Based Heavy Metal Biosensor

We have developed a fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based heavy metal biosensor for the quantification of bioavailable free heavy metals in the cytoplasm of the microalga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. The biosensor is composed of an end-to-end fusion of cyan fluorescent protein (CFP), chicken metallothionein II (MT-II), and yellow fluorescent protein (YFP). In vitro measurements of YFP/CFP fluorescence emission ratios indicated that the addition of metals to the purified biosensor enhanced FRET between CFP and YFP, consistent with heavy metal-induced folding of MT-II. A maximum YFP/CFP FRET ratio of 2.8 was observed in the presence of saturating concentrations of heavy metals. The sensitivity of the biosensor was greatest for Hg²⁺ followed by Cd²⁺ ≈ Pb²⁺ > Zn²⁺ > Cu²⁺. The heavy metal biosensor was unresponsive to metals that do not bind to MT-II (Na⁺ and Mg²⁺). When expressed in C. reinhardtii, we observed a differential metal-dependent response to saturating external concentrations (1.6 mm) of heavy metals (Pb²⁺ > Cd²⁺) that was unlike that observed for the isolated biosensor (in vitro). Significantly, analysis of metal uptake kinetics indicated that equilibration of the cytoplasm with externally applied heavy metals occurred within seconds. Our results also indicated that algae have substantial buffering capacity for free heavy metals in their cytosol, even at high external metal concentrations.Many proteins utilize metals to stabilize their structures or as cofactors to catalyze redox and other chemical reactions. Metals such as zinc, copper, iron, magnesium, cobalt, and manganese are required by most living organisms for their normal cellular functions. Essential metals are often present at low concentrations in the environment, however, and must be imported into cells, often at the expense of energy (Hanikenne et al., 2005; Merchant et al., 2006). In contrast to essential metals, toxic metals such as cadmium, lead, and mercury can disrupt cellular functions by competing with essential metals for their metal-binding sites and/or by altering the redox state of cells. Exposure of organisms to high concentrations of toxic metals can impair their cellular functions, growth, and reproduction. To prevent metal-induced cellular anomalies, organisms have evolved a variety of strategies to reduce the toxicity of heavy metals. One such strategy involves the selective binding of toxic metals in the cytoplasm by metal-binding proteins and other small molecules. As discussed below, both enzymatically and ribosomally synthesized Cys-rich peptides, including phytochelatins and metallothioneins (MTs), are utilized by a variety of organisms to sequester toxic heavy metals, including cadmium, mercury, lead, silver, and gold. The peptides may also serve as storage reserves for essential metals such as copper and zinc (Cobbett and Goldsbrough, 2002).Phytochelatins are enzymatically synthesized polypeptides containing repeating units of (γ-Glu-Cys)_n-Gly, where n = 2 to 11 (Rauser, 1990), whereas MTs are genetically encoded, ribosomally synthesized polypeptides (Cobbett and Goldsbrough, 2002). MTs have molecular mass values ranging from 6 to 7 kD and contain approximately 20 conserved Cys residues (Cobbett and Goldsbrough, 2002; Romero-Isart and Vasák, 2002). Metals are characteristically bound to MT via the thiolate sulfur ligands of Cys residues (Kägi, 1991). It is estimated that the metal-saturated MT contains about 10% thiolate sulfur and bound metals by mass (Romero-Isart and Vasák, 2002). Structural analyses of metal-free and metal-complexed MTs demonstrated that MTs undergo a structural transition from a metal-free random-coil structure to a metal-bound compact dumbbell-shaped structure having metal saturated α- and β-domains (Pearce et al., 2000; Romero-Isart and Vasak, 2002; Hong and Maret, 2003). The N-terminal β-domain binds three metal ion equivalents, and the C-terminal α-domain binds four metal ion equivalents (Romero-Isart and Vasák, 2002; Vasák, 2005). Furthermore, several decades of work on MTs have provided a great deal of information regarding their metal-binding affinity, specificity, and domain selectivity for select metals (Cobbett and Goldsbrough, 2002; Romero-Isart and Vasák, 2002; Vasák, 2005).Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) involves the nonradioactive transfer of energy between the excited state of a luminescent or fluorescent donor molecule and a nearby acceptor molecule that has overlapping excited state transitions. Proteins that are modified to have efficient energy donor and acceptor domains and that undergo structural changes upon binding a specific ligand are good candidates for FRET-based sensors. For ligand-specific FRET-based biosensors, the distance and/or the orientation between the energy donor and acceptor molecules is changed upon ligand binding in a concentration-dependent manner (Selvin, 1995; Weiss, 2000; Hong and Maret, 2003; Looger et al., 2005). Relevant to this discussion, a FRET-based biosensor with GFP variants fused to MT was previously shown to be an effective means to monitor metal release during nitric oxide-induced signaling in endothelial cells (Pearce et al., 2000).Unicellular algae such as Chlamydomonas species are often found in areas that might be contaminated by toxic heavy metals (Merchant et al., 2006). Chlamydomonas species have also been shown to sequester toxic metals (e.g. cadmium and mercury) and have potential use for bioremediation of these metals (Cai et al., 1999; Adhiya et al., 2002; Siripornadulsil et al., 2002; He et al., 2011; Priyadarshani et al., 2011). To determine the kinetics and selectivity of exogenous heavy metal uptake as well as free heavy metal concentration in the cytoplasm of Chlamydomonas species, we developed an MT, FRET-based metal-binding sensor and expressed this in the cytoplasm of the unicellular green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. We demonstrate that heavy metal uptake is rapid in C. reinhardtii and that cytoplasmic free heavy metal concentrations are substantially lower than exogenous free heavy metal concentrations, implying that heavy metals are rapidly sequestered by various biological molecules in the cell.     

The Arabidopsis Endosomal Sorting Complex Required for Transport III Regulates Internal Vesicle Formation of the Prevacuolar Compartment and Is Required for Plant Development

We have established an efficient transient expression system with several vacuolar reporters to study the roles of endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT)-III subunits in regulating the formation of intraluminal vesicles of prevacuolar compartments (PVCs)/multivesicular bodies (MVBs) in plant cells. By measuring the distributions of reporters on/within the membrane of PVC/MVB or tonoplast, we have identified dominant negative mutants of ESCRT-III subunits that affect membrane protein degradation from both secretory and endocytic pathways. In addition, induced expression of these mutants resulted in reduction in luminal vesicles of PVC/MVB, along with increased detection of membrane-attaching vesicles inside the PVC/MVB. Transgenic Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) plants with induced expression of ESCRT-III dominant negative mutants also displayed severe cotyledon developmental defects with reduced cell size, loss of the central vacuole, and abnormal chloroplast development in mesophyll cells, pointing out an essential role of the ESCRT-III complex in postembryonic development in plants. Finally, membrane dissociation of ESCRT-III components is important for their biological functions and is regulated by direct interaction among Vacuolar Protein Sorting-Associated Protein20-1 (VPS20.1), Sucrose Nonfermenting7-1, VPS2.1, and the adenosine triphosphatase VPS4/SUPPRESSOR OF K⁺ TRANSPORT GROWTH DEFECT1.Endomembrane trafficking in plant cells is complicated such that secretory, endocytic, and recycling pathways are usually integrated with each other at the post-Golgi compartments, among which, the trans-Golgi network (TGN) and prevacuolar compartment (PVC)/multivesicular body (MVB) are best studied (Tse et al., 2004; Lam et al., 2007a, 2007b; Müller et al., 2007; Foresti and Denecke, 2008; Hwang, 2008; Otegui and Spitzer, 2008; Robinson et al., 2008; Richter et al., 2009; Ding et al., 2012; Gao et al., 2014). Following the endocytic trafficking of a lipophilic dye, FM4-64, the TGN and PVC/MVB are sequentially labeled and thus are defined as the early and late endosome, respectively, in plant cells (Lam et al., 2007a; Chow et al., 2008). While the TGN is a tubular vesicular-like structure that may include several different microdomains and fit its biological function as a sorting station (Chow et al., 2008; Kang et al., 2011), the PVC/MVB is 200 to 500 nm in size with multiple luminal vesicles of approximately 40 nm (Tse et al., 2004). Membrane cargoes destined for degradation are sequestered into these tiny luminal vesicles and delivered to the lumen of the lytic vacuole (LV) via direct fusion between the PVC/MVB and the LV (Spitzer et al., 2009; Viotti et al., 2010; Cai et al., 2012). Therefore, the PVC/MVB functions between the TGN and LV as an intermediate organelle and decides the fate of membrane cargoes in the LV.In yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), carboxypeptidase S (CPS) is synthesized as a type II integral membrane protein and sorted from the Golgi to the lumen of the vacuole (Spormann et al., 1992). Genetic analyses on the trafficking of CPS have led to the identification of approximately 17 class E genes (Piper et al., 1995; Babst et al., 1997, 2002a, 2002b; Odorizzi et al., 1998; Katzmann et al., 2001) that constitute the core endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT) machinery. The evolutionarily conserved ESCRT complex consists of several functionally different subcomplexes, ESCRT-0, ESCRT-I, ESCRT-II, and ESCRT-III and the ESCRT-III-associated/Vacuolar Protein Sorting4 (VPS4) complex. Together, they form a complex protein-protein interaction network that coordinates sorting of cargoes and inward budding of the membrane on the MVB (Hurley and Hanson, 2010; Henne et al., 2011). Cargo proteins carrying ubiquitin signals are thought to be passed from one ESCRT subcomplex to the next, starting with their recognition by ESCRT-0 (Bilodeau et al., 2002, 2003; Hislop and von Zastrow, 2011; Le Bras et al., 2011; Shields and Piper, 2011; Urbé, 2011). ESCRT-0 recruits the ESCRT-I complex, a heterotetramer of VPS23, VPS28, VPS37, and MVB12, from the cytosol to the endosomal membrane (Katzmann et al., 2001, 2003). The C terminus of VPS28 interacts with the N terminus of VPS36, a member of the ESCRT-II complex (Kostelansky et al., 2006; Teo et al., 2006). Then, cargoes passed from ESCRT-I and ESCRT-II are concentrated in certain membrane domains of the endosome by ESCRT-III, which includes four coiled-coil proteins and is sufficient to induce the membrane invagination (Babst et al., 2002b; Saksena et al., 2009; Wollert et al., 2009). Finally, the ESCRT components are disassociated from the membrane by the adenosine triphosphatase (ATPase) associated with diverse cellular activities (AAA) VPS4/SUPPRESSOR OF K+ TRANSPORT GROWTH DEFECT1 (SKD1) before releasing the internal vesicles (Babst et al., 1997, 1998).Putative homologs of ESCRT-I–ESCRT-III and ESCRT-III-associated components have been identified in plants, except for ESCRT-0, which is only present in Opisthokonta (Winter and Hauser, 2006; Leung et al., 2008; Schellmann and Pimpl, 2009). To date, only a few plant ESCRT components have been studied in detail. The Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) AAA ATPase SKD1 localized to the PVC/MVB and showed ATPase activity that was regulated by Lysosomal Trafficking Regulator-Interacting Protein5, a plant homolog of Vps Twenty Associated1 Protein (Haas et al., 2007). Expression of the dominant negative form of SKD1 caused an increase in the size of the MVB and a reduction in the number of internal vesicles (Haas et al., 2007). This protein also contributes to the maintenance of the central vacuole and might be associated with cell cycle regulation, as leaf trichomes expressing its dominant negative mutant form lost the central vacuole and frequently contained multiple nuclei (Shahriari et al., 2010). Double null mutants of CHARGED MULTIVESICULAR BODY PROTEIN, chmp1achmp1b, displayed severe growth defects and were seedling lethal. This may be due to the mislocalization of plasma membrane (PM) proteins, including those involved in auxin transport such as PINFORMED1, PINFORMED2, and AUXIN-RESISTANT1, from the vacuolar degradation pathway to the tonoplast of the LV (Spitzer et al., 2009).Plant ESCRT components usually contain several homologs, with the possibility of functional redundancy. Single mutants of individual ESCRT components may not result in an obvious phenotype, whereas knockout of all homologs of an ESCRT component by generating double or triple mutants may be lethal to the plant. As a first step to carry out systematic analysis on each ESCRT complex in plant cells, here, we established an efficient analysis system to monitor the localization changes of four vacuolar reporters that accumulate either in the lumen (LRR84A-GFP, EMP12-GFP, and aleurain-GFP) or on the tonoplast (GFP-VIT1) of the LV and identified several ESCRT-III dominant negative mutants. We reported that ESCRT-III subunits were involved in the release of PVC/MVB’s internal vesicles from the limiting membrane and were required for membrane protein degradation from secretory and endocytic pathways. In addition, transgenic Arabidopsis plants with induced expression of ESCRT-III dominant negative mutants showed severe cotyledon developmental defects. We also showed that membrane dissociation of ESCRT-III subunits was regulated by direct interaction with SKD1.     

Revisiting Plant Plasma Membrane Lipids in Tobacco: A Focus on Sphingolipids

The lipid composition of plasma membrane (PM) and the corresponding detergent-insoluble membrane (DIM) fraction were analyzed with a specific focus on highly polar sphingolipids, so-called glycosyl inositol phosphorylceramides (GIPCs). Using tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) ‘Bright Yellow 2’ cell suspension and leaves, evidence is provided that GIPCs represent up to 40 mol % of the PM lipids. Comparative analysis of DIMs with the PM showed an enrichment of 2-hydroxylated very-long-chain fatty acid-containing GIPCs and polyglycosylated GIPCs in the DIMs. Purified antibodies raised against these GIPCs were further used for immunogold-electron microscopy strategy, revealing the distribution of polyglycosylated GIPCs in domains of 35 ± 7 nm in the plane of the PM. Biophysical studies also showed strong interactions between GIPCs and sterols and suggested a role for very-long-chain fatty acids in the interdigitation between the two PM-composing monolayers. The ins and outs of lipid asymmetry, raft formation, and interdigitation in plant membrane biology are finally discussed.Eukaryotic plasma membranes (PMs) are composed of three main classes of lipids, glycerolipids, sphingolipids, and sterols, which may account for up to 100,000 different molecular species (Yetukuri et al., 2008; Shevchenko and Simons, 2010). Overall, all glycerolipids share the same molecular moieties in plants, animals, and fungi. By contrast, sterols and sphingolipids are different and specific to each kingdom. For instance, the plant PM contains an important number of sterols, among which β-sitosterol, stigmasterol, and campesterol predominate (Furt et al., 2011). In addition to free sterols, phytosterols can be conjugated to form steryl glycosides (SG) and acyl steryl glycosides (ASG) that represent up to approximately 15% of the tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) PM (Furt et al., 2010). As for sphingolipids, sphingomyelin, the major phosphosphingolipid in animals, which harbors a phosphocholine as a polar head, is not detected in plants. Glycosyl inositol phosphorylceramides (GIPCs) are the major class of sphingolipids in plants, but they are absent in animals (Sperling and Heinz, 2003; Pata et al., 2010). Sphingolipidomic approaches identified up to 200 plant sphingolipids (for review, see Pata et al., 2010; Cacas et al., 2013).Although GIPCs belong to one of the earliest classes of plant sphingolipids that were identified in the late 1950s (Carter et al., 1958), only a few GIPCs have been structurally characterized to date because of their high polarity and a limited solubility in typical lipid extraction solvents. For these reasons, they were systematically omitted from published plant PM lipid composition. GIPCs are formed by the addition of an inositol phosphate to the ceramide moiety, the inositol headgroup of which can then undergo several glycosylation steps. The dominant glycan structure, composed of a hexose-GlcA linked to the inositol, is called series A. Polar heads containing three to seven sugars, so-called series B to F, have been identified and appeared to be species specific (Buré et al., 2011; Cacas et al., 2013; Mortimer et al., 2013). The ceramide moiety of GIPCs consists of a long-chain base (LCB), mainly t18:0 (called phytosphingosine) or t18:1 compounds (for review, see Pata et al., 2010), to which is amidified a very-long-chain fatty acid (VLCFA), the latter of which is mostly 2-hydroxylated (hVLCFA) with an odd or even number of carbon atoms. In plants, little is known about the subcellular localization of GIPCs. It is assumed, however, that they would be highly represented in the PM (Worrall et al., 2003; Sperling et al., 2005), even if this remains to be experimentally proven. The main argument supporting such an assumption is the strong enrichment of trihydroxylated LCB (t18:n) in detergent-insoluble membrane (DIM) fractions (Borner et al., 2005; Lefebvre et al., 2007), LCB being known to be predominant in GIPC’s core structure as aforementioned.In addition to this chemical complexity, lipids are not evenly distributed within the PM. Sphingolipids and sterols can preferentially interact with each other and segregate to form microdomains dubbed the membrane raft (Simons and Toomre, 2000). The membrane raft hypothesis suggests that lipids play a regulatory role in mediating protein clustering within the bilayer by undergoing phase separation into liquid-disordered and liquid-ordered phases. The liquid-ordered phase, termed the membrane raft, was described as enriched in sterol and saturated sphingolipids and is characterized by tight lipid packing. Proteins, which have differential affinities for each phase, may become enriched in, or excluded from, the liquid-ordered phase domains to optimize the rate of protein-protein interactions and maximize signaling processes. In animals, rafts have been implicated in a huge range of cellular processes, such as hormone signaling, membrane trafficking in polarized epithelial cells, T cell activation, cell migration, and the life cycle of influenza and human immunodeficiency viruses (Simons and Ikonen, 1997; Simons and Gerl, 2010). In plants, evidence is increasing that rafts are also involved in signal transduction processes and membrane trafficking (for review, see Mongrand et al., 2010; Simon-Plas et al., 2011; Cacas et al., 2012a).Moreover, lipids are not evenly distributed between the two leaflets of the PM. Within the PM of eukaryotic cells, sphingolipids are primarily located in the outer monolayer, whereas unsaturated phospholipids are predominantly exposed on the cytosolic leaflet. This asymmetrical distribution has been well established in human red blood cells, in which the outer leaflet contains sphingomyelin, phosphatidylcholine, and a variety of glycolipids like gangliosides. By contrast, the cytoplasmic leaflet is composed mostly of phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylserine, phosphatidylinositol, and their phosphorylated derivatives (Devaux and Morris, 2004). With regard to sphingolipids and glycerolipids, the asymmetry of the former is established during their biosynthesis and that of the latter requires ATPases such as the aminophospholipid translocase that transports lipids from the outer to the inner leaflet as well as multiple drug resistance proteins that transport phosphatidylcholine in the opposite direction (Devaux and Morris, 2004). This ubiquitous scheme encountered in animal cells could apply in plant cells as proposed (Tjellstrom et al., 2010). Indeed, the authors showed that there is a pronounced transverse lipid asymmetry in root at the PM. Phospholipids and galactolipids dominate the cytosolic leaflet, whereas the apoplastic leaflet is enriched in sphingolipids and sterols.From such a high diversity of the plant PM thus arises the question of the respective contribution of lipids to membrane suborganization. Our group recently tackled this aspect by characterizing the order level of liposomes prepared from various plant lipids and labeled with the environment-sensitive probe di-4-ANEPPDHQ (Grosjean et al., 2015). Fluorescence spectroscopy experiments showed that, among phytosterols, campesterol exhibits the strongest ability to order model membranes. In agreement with these data, spatial analysis of the membrane organization through multispectral confocal microscopy pointed to the strong ability of campesterol to promote liquid-ordered domain formation and organize their spatial distribution at the membrane surface. Conjugated sterols also exhibit a striking ability to order membranes. In addition, GIPCs enhance the sterol-induced ordering effect by emphasizing the formation and increasing the size of sterol-dependent ordered domains.The aim of this study was to reinvestigate the lipid composition and organization of the PM with a particular focus on GIPCs using tobacco leaves and cv Bright Yellow 2 (BY-2) cell cultures as models. Analyzing all membrane lipid classes at once, including sphingolipids, is challenging because they all display dramatically different chemical polarity, from very apolar (like free sterols) to highly polar (like polyglycosylated GIPCs) molecules. Most lipid extraction techniques published thus far use a chloroform/methanol mixture and phase partition to remove contaminants, resulting in the loss GIPCs, which remain in the aqueous phase, unextracted in the insoluble pellet, or at the interphase (Markham et al., 2006). In order to gain access to both glycerolipid and sphingolipid species at a glance, we developed a protocol whereby the esterifed or amidified fatty acids were hydrolyzed from the glycerol backbone (glycerolipids) or the LCB (sphingolipids) of membrane lipids, respectively. Fatty acids were then analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) with appropriate internal standards for quantification. We further proposed that the use of methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) ensures the extraction of all classes of plant polar lipids. Our results indicate that GIPCs represent up to 40 mol % of total tobacco PM lipids. Interestingly, polyglycolyslated GIPCs are 5-fold enriched in DIMs of BY-2 cells when compared with the PM. Further investigation led us to develop a preparative purification procedure that allowed us to obtain enough material to raise antibodies against GIPCs. Using immunogold labeling on PM vesicles, it was found that polyglycosylated GIPCs cluster in membrane nanodomains, strengthening the idea that lateral nanosegregation of sphingolipids takes place at the PM in plants. Multispectral confocal microscopy was performed on vesicles prepared using GIPCs, phospholipids, and sterols and labeled with the environment-sensitive probe di-4-ANEPPDHQ. Our results show that, despite different fatty acid and polar head compositions, GIPCs extracted from tobacco leaves and BY-2 cells have a similar intrinsic propensity of enhancing vesicle global order together with sterols. Assuming that GIPCs are mostly present in the outer leaflet of the PM, interactions between sterols and sphingolipids were finally studied by the Langmuir monolayer technique, and the area of a single molecule of GIPC, or in interaction with phytosterols, was calculated. Using the calculation docking method, the energy of interaction between GIPCs and phytosterols was determined. A model was proposed in which GIPCs and phytosterols interact together to form liquid-ordered domains and in which the VLCFAs of GIPCs promote the interdigitation of the two membrane leaflets. The implications of domain formation and the asymmetrical distribution of lipids at the PM in plants are also discussed. Finally, we propose a model that reconsiders the intricate organization of the plant PM bilayer.     

Salicylic Acid Regulates Arabidopsis Microbial Pattern Receptor Kinase Levels and Signaling

In Arabidopsis thaliana, responses to pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) are mediated by cell surface pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) and include the accumulation of reactive oxygen species, callose deposition in the cell wall, and the generation of the signal molecule salicylic acid (SA). SA acts in a positive feedback loop with ACCELERATED CELL DEATH6 (ACD6), a membrane protein that contributes to immunity. This work shows that PRRs associate with and are part of the ACD6/SA feedback loop. ACD6 positively regulates the abundance of several PRRs and affects the responsiveness of plants to two PAMPs. SA accumulation also causes increased levels of PRRs and potentiates the responsiveness of plants to PAMPs. Finally, SA induces PRR- and ACD6-dependent signaling to induce callose deposition independent of the presence of PAMPs. This PAMP-independent effect of SA causes a transient reduction of PRRs and ACD6-dependent reduced responsiveness to PAMPs. Thus, SA has a dynamic effect on the regulation and function of PRRs. Within a few hours, SA signaling promotes defenses and downregulates PRRs, whereas later (within 24 to 48 h) SA signaling upregulates PRRs, and plants are rendered more responsive to PAMPs. These results implicate multiple modes of signaling for PRRs in response to PAMPs and SA.     

Hitching a Ride on Vesicles: Cauliflower Mosaic Virus Movement Protein Trafficking in the Endomembrane System

The transport of a viral genome from cell to cell is enabled by movement proteins (MPs) targeting the cell periphery to mediate the gating of plasmodesmata. Given their essential role in the development of viral infection, understanding the regulation of MPs is of great importance. Here, we show that cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) MP contains three tyrosine-based sorting signals that interact with an Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) μA-adaptin subunit. Fluorophore-tagged MP is incorporated into vesicles labeled with the endocytic tracer N-(3-triethylammoniumpropyl)-4-(6-(4-(diethylamino)phenyl)hexatrienyl)pyridinium dibromide. The presence of at least one of the three endocytosis motifs is essential for internalization of the protein from the plasma membrane to early endosomes, for tubule formation, and for CaMV infection. In addition, we show that MP colocalizes in vesicles with the Rab GTPase AtRAB-F2b, which is resident in prevacuolar late endosomal compartments that deliver proteins to the vacuole for degradation. Altogether, these results demonstrate that CaMV MP traffics in the endocytic pathway and that virus viability depends on functional host endomembranes.Membrane trafficking is essential in eukaryotic cells. Cellular membranes serve as a delivery system for newly synthesized proteins such as transporters and receptors exiting the endoplasmic reticulum after proper folding. They then transit through the Golgi complex, reaching the plasma membrane (PM) or the tonoplast via intermediate endomembrane compartments. Receptors and transporters returning from the PM are either recycled or targeted to the vacuole for degradation. Delivery and recycling sorting pathways overlap in the trans-Golgi network (TGN)/early endosome (EE), an intermediate compartment for both exocytosis and endocytosis (Reyes et al., 2011). In plant systems, the endoplasmic reticulum and PM provide membrane continuity between cells through the connections made by plasmodesmata (PD), cytoplasmic channels that regulate traffic in the symplasm (Maule et al., 2011).The selective transport of macromolecules between different compartments of the endomembrane system is mediated by coat proteins promoting the generation of small cargo-trafficking coated vesicles (Spang, 2008). The recognition and recruitment of cargo proteins are mediated by so-called adaptor complexes (AP complexes [AP-1–AP-4]; Robinson, 2004) one of which, AP-1, is localized on the TGN/EE and endosomes, whereas AP-2 is in the PM. The μ-subunit of AP complexes is devoted to cargo protein selection via a specific and well-characterized interaction with a Tyr-sorting signal, YXXΦ, where Φ is a bulky hydrophobic residue and X is any amino acid (Bonifacino and Dell’Angelica, 1999). YXXΦ motifs are present in the cytoplasmic tail of many proteins integral to the PM and TGN/EE and have been found in the movement proteins (MPs) of some viruses (Laporte et al., 2003; Haupt et al., 2005). Plant viruses are obligate parasites that exploit host components to move within the cell and from cell to cell into the vascular system for systemic invasion of the host. Virus movement, which requires the passage of macromolecules through PD connections, is mediated by one or more virus-encoded MPs with the help of the host cytoskeleton and/or endomembranes (Harries et al., 2010). While most MPs act to increase the size exclusion limit of PD to facilitate the passage of the viral nucleoprotein complex, other MPs are assembled in tubules that pass inside highly modified PD and transport encapsidated particles through their lumen.Here, we focus on this second group of tubule-forming MPs and examine the intracellular trafficking of cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) MP. The MP encoded by CaMV forms tubules guiding encapsidated virus particle cell-to-cell transport via an indirect MP-virion interaction (Stavolone et al., 2005; Sánchez-Navarro et al., 2010). However, how CaMV MP (and the other tubule-forming MPs) targets the PM and forms tubules remains to be elucidated. Tubule-forming MPs do not require an intact cytoskeleton for PM targeting (Huang et al., 2000; Pouwels et al., 2002) and/or tubule formation (Laporte et al., 2003). However, suppression of tubule formation upon treatment with brefeldin A (BFA), a specific inhibitor of secretion or endocytosis, suggests the involvement of the endomembrane system in correct functioning of some tubule-forming MPs (Huang et al., 2000; Laporte et al., 2003). In this study, we examined the three Tyr-sorting motifs in CaMV MP and show that each of the three domains interacts directly with subunit μ of an Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) AP complex. Mutations in these domains revert in the viral context to maintain CaMV viability. MP is found in endosomal compartments labeled by AtRAB-F2b (ARA7) and N-(3-triethylammoniumpropyl)-4-(6-(4-(diethylamino)phenyl)hexatrienyl)pyridinium dibromide (FM4-64). The presence of at least one functional YXXΦ domain is essential for the localization of MP to endosomes and for tubule assembly but is not required for MP targeting to the PM. We provide several lines of evidence to show CaMV MP trafficking in the endocytic pathway. Our findings are discussed in the light of the recent demonstration that the TGN/EE functions as a major hub controlling secretory and endocytic pathways in plants.     

Determining the Subcellular Location of Synthesis and Assembly of the Cell Wall Polysaccharide (1,3; 1,4)-β-d-Glucan in Grasses

The current dogma for cell wall polysaccharide biosynthesis is that cellulose (and callose) is synthesized at the plasma membrane (PM), whereas matrix phase polysaccharides are assembled in the Golgi apparatus. We provide evidence that (1,3;1,4)-β-d-glucan (mixed-linkage glucan [MLG]) does not conform to this paradigm. We show in various grass (Poaceae) species that MLG-specific antibody labeling is present in the wall but absent over Golgi, suggesting it is assembled at the PM. Antibodies to the MLG synthases, cellulose synthase-like F6 (CSLF6) and CSLH1, located CSLF6 to the endoplasmic reticulum, Golgi, secretory vesicles, and the PM and CSLH1 to the same locations apart from the PM. This pattern was recreated upon expression of VENUS-tagged barley (Hordeum vulgare) CSLF6 and CSLH1 in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves and, consistent with our biochemical analyses of native grass tissues, shown to be catalytically active with CSLF6 and CSLH1 in PM-enriched and PM-depleted membrane fractions, respectively. These data support a PM location for the synthesis of MLG by CSLF6, the predominant enzymatically active isoform. A model is proposed to guide future experimental approaches to dissect the molecular mechanism(s) of MLG assembly.     

Divergent Roles for Maize PAN1 and PAN2 Receptor-Like Proteins in Cytokinesis and Cell Morphogenesis

Pangloss1 (PAN1) and PAN2 are leucine-rich repeat receptor-like proteins that function cooperatively to polarize the divisions of subsidiary mother cells (SMCs) during stomatal development in maize (Zea mays). PANs colocalize in SMCs, and both PAN1 and PAN2 promote polarization of the actin cytoskeleton and nuclei in these cells. Here, we show that PAN1 and PAN2 have additional functions that are unequal or divergent. PAN1, but not PAN2, is localized to cell plates in all classes of dividing cells examined. pan1 mutants exhibited no defects in cell plate formation or in the recruitment or removal of a variety of cell plate components; thus, they did not demonstrate a function for PAN1 in cytokinesis. PAN2, in turn, plays a greater role than PAN1 in directing patterns of postmitotic cell expansion that determine the shapes of mature stomatal subsidiary cells and interstomatal cells. Localization studies indicate that PAN2 impacts subsidiary cell shape indirectly by stimulating localized cortical actin accumulation and polarized growth in interstomatal cells. Localization of PAN1, Rho of Plants2, and PIN1a suggests that PAN2-dependent cell shape changes do not involve any of these proteins, indicating that PAN2 function is linked to actin polymerization by a different mechanism in interstomatal cells compared with SMCs. Together, these results demonstrate that PAN1 and PAN2 are not dedicated to SMC polarization but instead play broader roles in plant development. We speculate that PANs may function in all contexts to regulate polarized membrane trafficking either directly or indirectly via their influence on actin polymerization.Leucine-rich repeat (LRR)-receptor-like kinases (RLKs) regulate many aspects of plant development and physiology. While few ligands have been definitively identified, the general view of the function of these proteins is that interaction of ligand(s) with the LRR-containing extracellular domains regulates the activity of the intracellular kinase domains, triggering downstream cellular responses. While the kinase domains of many such receptor-like proteins appear to be catalytically inactive (an estimated approximately 20% of all Arabidopsis [Arabidopsis thaliana] RLKs, based on bioinformatics analyses; Castells and Casacuberta, 2007), many such “pseudokinases” nevertheless participate in signal transduction via interaction with active kinases (other LRR-RLKs or cytoplasmic kinases; Llompart et al., 2003; Boudeau et al., 2006; Rajakulendran and Sicheri, 2010).We previously identified a pair of LRR-RLKs in maize (Zea mays), Pangloss1 (PAN1) and PAN2, which function cooperatively to polarize the asymmetric divisions of subsidiary mother cells (SMCs) during stomatal development (Cartwright et al., 2009; Zhang et al., 2012). In response to hypothetical polarizing cues from the adjacent guard mother cell (GMC), premitotic SMCs polarize toward the GMC, involving migration of the nucleus to the site of GMC contact and the formation of a pronounced enrichment of cortical F-actin at that site. Subsequently, SMCs divide asymmetrically to produce subsidiary cells flanking the GMC, which in turn divides to produce a guard cell pair (Galatis and Apostolakos, 2004). In pan1 and pan2 mutants, defects in premitotic SMC polarization (evident from a lack of nuclear polarization and/or actin accumulation at the GMC contact site) lead to abnormally oriented divisions producing aberrantly shaped subsidiaries that often fail to differentiate correctly (Gallagher and Smith, 2000; Cartwright et al., 2009; Zhang et al., 2012). A function for PAN1 and PAN2 in responding to ligands produced by adjacent GMCs is consistent with the finding that both proteins accumulate in SMCs preferentially at the site of contact with GMCs, prior to actin accumulation and nuclear polarization to this site (Cartwright et al., 2009; Zhang et al., 2012). However, no ligands for PAN1 or PAN2 have yet been identified. A synergistic increase in the frequency of SMC polarity defects in pan1;pan2 double mutants provides evidence of cooperative or partially redundant functions for these LRR-RLKs, but we found no evidence that they physically interact as expected for a coreceptor pair (Zhang et al., 2012). Instead, localization studies revealed that these proteins act sequentially, with PAN2 functioning upstream of PAN1, because the polarized accumulation of PAN1 at GMC contact sites of SMCs requires PAN2 but not vice versa (Cartwright et al., 2009; Zhang et al., 2012). The kinase domains of both PAN1 and PAN2 are inactive in vitro, as predicted from the lack of certain amino acids needed for catalytic activity (Cartwright et al., 2009; Zhang et al., 2012), but both may function in signaling via a kinase domain-mediated association with active kinases. The downstream events linking PAN function to premitotic SMC polarization are largely unknown, but PAN1 functions cooperatively with, and physically interacts with, type I Rho of Plants (ROP) GTPases to promote SMC polarization (Humphries et al., 2011). Considering that Rho family GTPases including ROPs in plants are well known for their roles in regulating actin polymerization (Yalovsky et al., 2008), this finding suggests that ROPs link PAN1 to localized actin polymerization at GMC contact sites. However, the functional significance of localized actin accumulation at the GMC contact site of SMCs is unclear.In addition to their function in maize SMC polarization, type I ROPs function in a variety of plant cells undergoing polarized cell expansion to mediate the localized accumulation of F-actin associated with localized expansion of the cell surface (Yalovsky et al., 2008). The roles of actin and ROPs in polarized cell growth have been studied in the context of tip-growing pollen tubes and root hairs as well as in epidermal pavement cells, where nonuniform patterns of cell expansion underlie the formation of lobes that interlock adjacent cells together. Arabidopsis ROP2 is enriched at sites of pavement cell lobe outgrowth, where it acts via the novel ROP effector ROP-Interactive CRIB Domain-Containing4 (RIC4) to stimulate localized cortical F-actin enrichment (Fu et al., 2005). Studies of the role of auxin and the auxin-binding protein ABP1 in this process support a model in which ABP1-auxin interaction at the cell surface signals through ROP2 and RIC4 to promote actin-dependent localized accumulation of the auxin efflux carrier PIN1, further increasing the local concentration of auxin and establishing a local feedback loop that promotes localized cell expansion (Xu et al., 2010; Yang and Lavagi, 2012). In pollen tubes, actin filaments provide both long- and short-range guidance for vesicles trafficking to and from the growth site and may also directly influence vesicle fusion and/or removal from the plasma membrane (Qin and Yang, 2011; Chebli et al., 2013). Thus, actin regulation of membrane trafficking plays a central role in polarized cell growth in all cell types where it has been studied, although the mechanisms by which actin influences these processes may not be the same in all cell types.The cytoskeleton and membrane trafficking also play critical roles in plant cytokinesis. During somatic cell divisions, an actin- and microtubule-based structure called the phragmoplast forms between daughter nuclei after mitosis and functions as a dynamic scaffold for the assembly of a new cell wall (cell plate) separating the daughter cells (Jürgens, 2005). The cell plate is initiated via vesicle fusion at the phragmoplast equator and proceeds through a complex series of membrane-remodeling events to form a network of interconnected tubules and eventually a continuous sheet perforated by plasmodesmata, involving ongoing fusion and fission of vesicles (Samuels et al., 1995; Seguí-Simarro et al., 2004). A wide variety of proteins regulating vesicle targeting, fusion, and fission are localized to cell plate membranes, with variations in timing suggesting participation in distinct phases of cell plate formation (McMichael and Bednarek, 2013). The cell plate is also an active site of cell wall and membrane biosynthesis directed by enzymes that are recruited to the plate with characteristic timing (McMichael and Bednarek, 2013). Studies with cytoskeleton-disrupting drugs have clearly demonstrated an essential role for phragmoplast microtubules in transporting vesicles to the cell plate, but the role of phragmoplast F-actin is less clear (Jürgens, 2005). The mechanisms responsible for the coordination and temporal regulation of the complex events underlying cell plate formation during cytokinesis are largely unknown.Here, we report new and unequal roles for PAN1 and PAN2 outside of SMCs. PAN1, but not PAN2, is localized to cell plates, although no essential function for PAN1 in cell plate formation was found via an analysis of pan mutants. PAN2 plays a greater role than PAN1 in the coordinated morphogenesis of interstomatal cells and stomatal subsidiary cells that produce the characteristic shapes of maize stomata. Thus, PANs do not always function cooperatively and have other roles besides the promotion of premitotic SMC polarization, with implications regarding the cellular processes in which these receptor-like proteins function.     

Brassinosteroid Regulates Cell Elongation by Modulating Gibberellin Metabolism in Rice

Brassinosteroid (BR) and gibberellin (GA) are two predominant hormones regulating plant cell elongation. A defect in either of these leads to reduced plant growth and dwarfism. However, their relationship remains unknown in rice (Oryza sativa). Here, we demonstrated that BR regulates cell elongation by modulating GA metabolism in rice. Under physiological conditions, BR promotes GA accumulation by regulating the expression of GA metabolic genes to stimulate cell elongation. BR greatly induces the expression of D18/GA3ox-2, one of the GA biosynthetic genes, leading to increased GA₁ levels, the bioactive GA in rice seedlings. Consequently, both d18 and loss-of-function GA-signaling mutants have decreased BR sensitivity. When excessive active BR is applied, the hormone mostly induces GA inactivation through upregulation of the GA inactivation gene GA2ox-3 and also represses BR biosynthesis, resulting in decreased hormone levels and growth inhibition. As a feedback mechanism, GA extensively inhibits BR biosynthesis and the BR response. GA treatment decreases the enlarged leaf angles in plants with enhanced BR biosynthesis or signaling. Our results revealed a previously unknown mechanism underlying BR and GA crosstalk depending on tissues and hormone levels, which greatly advances our understanding of hormone actions in crop plants and appears much different from that in Arabidopsis thaliana.