F plasmid partition depends on interaction of SopA with non-specific DNA

Bacterial ATPases belonging to the ParA family assure partition of their replicons by forming dynamic assemblies which move replicon copies into the new cell-halves. The mechanism underlying partition is not understood for the Walker-box ATPase class, which includes most plasmid and all chromosomal ParAs. The ATPases studied both polymerize and interact with non-specific DNA in an ATP-dependent manner. Previous work showed that in vitro, polymerization of one such ATPase, SopA of plasmid F, is inhibited by DNA, suggesting that interaction of SopA with the host nucleoid could regulate partition. In an attempt to identify amino acids in SopA that are needed for interaction with non-specific DNA, we have found that mutation of codon 340 (lysine to alanine) reduces ATP-dependent DNA binding > 100-fold and correspondingly diminishes SopA activities that depend on it: inhibition of polymer formation and persistence, stimulation of basal-level ATP hydrolysis and localization over the nucleoid. The K340A mutant retained all other SopA properties tested except plasmid stabilization; substitution of the mutant SopA for wild-type nearly abolished mini-F partition. The behaviour of this mutant indicates a causal link between interaction with the cell's non-specific DNA and promotion of the dynamic behaviour that ensures F plasmid partition.     

Disruption of the F plasmid partition complex in vivo by partition protein SopA

The SopA protein plays an essential, though so far undefined, role in partition of the mini-F plasmid but, when overproduced, it causes loss of mini-F from growing cells. Our investigation of this phenomenon has revealed that excess SopA protein reduces the linking number of mini-F. It appears to do so by disturbing the partition complex, in which SopB normally introduces local positive supercoiling upon binding to the sopC centromere, as it occurs only in plasmids carrying sopC and in the presence of SopB protein. SopA-induced reduction in linking number is not associated with altered sop promoter activity or levels of SopB protein and occurs in the absence of changes in overall supercoil density. SopA protein mutated in the ATPase nucleotide-binding site (K120Q) or lacking the presumed SopB interaction domain does not induce the reduction in linking number, suggesting that excess SopA disrupts the partition complex by interacting with SopB to remove positive supercoils in an ATP-dependent manner. Destabilization of mini-F also depends on sopC and SopB, but the K120Q mutant retains some capacity for destabilizing mini-F. SopA-induced destabilization thus appears to be complex and may involve more than one SopA activity. The results are interpreted in terms of a regulatory role for SopA in the oligomerization of SopB dimers bound to the centromere.     

Polymerization of SopA partition ATPase: regulation by DNA binding and SopB

In bacteria, mitotic stability of plasmids and many chromosomes depends on replicon-specific systems which comprise a centromere, a centromere-binding protein and an ATPase. Dynamic self-assembly of the ATPase appears to enable active partition of replicon copies into cell-halves, but for most ATPases (the Walker-box type) the mechanism is unknown. Also unknown is how the host cell contributes to partition. We have examined the effects of non-sequence-specific DNA on in vitro self-assembly of the SopA partition ATPase of plasmid F. SopA underwent polymerization provided ATP was present. DNA inhibited this polymerization and caused breakdown of pre-formed polymers. Centromere-binding protein SopB counteracted DNA-mediated inhibition by itself binding to and masking the DNA, as well as by stimulating polymerization directly. The results suggest that in vivo, SopB smothers DNA by spreading from sopC, allowing SopA-ATP polymerization which initiates plasmid displacement. We propose that SopB and nucleoid DNA regulate SopA polymerization and hence partition.     

Autoregulation of the partition genes of the mini-F plasmid and the intracellular localization of their products in Escherichia coli

The sopAB operon and the sopC sequence, which acts as a centromere, are essential for stable maintenance of the mini-F plasmid. Immunoprecipitation experiments with purified SopA and SopB proteins have demonstrated that these proteins interact in vitro. Expression studies using the lacZ gene as a reporter revealed that the sopAB operon is repressed by the cooperative action of SopA and SopB. Using immunofluorescence microscopy, we found discrete fluorescent foci of SopA and SopB in cells that produce both SopA and SopB in the presence of the sopC DNA segment, but not in the absence of sopC, suggesting the SopA-SopB complex binds to sopC segments. SopA was exclusively found to colocalize with nucleoids in cells that produced only SopA, while, in the absence of SopA, SopB was distributed in the cytosolic spaces.     

Dual Role of DNA in Regulating ATP Hydrolysis by the SopA Partition Protein

In bacteria, mitotic stability of plasmids and many chromosomes depends on replicon-specific systems, which comprise a centromere, a centromere-binding protein and an ATPase. Dynamic self-assembly of the ATPase appears to enable active partition of replicon copies into cell-halves, but for Walker-box partition ATPases the molecular mechanism is unknown. ATPase activity appears to be essential for this process. DNA and centromere-binding proteins are known to stimulate the ATPase activity but molecular details of the stimulation mechanism have not been reported. We have investigated the interactions which stimulate ATP hydrolysis by the SopA partition ATPase of plasmid F. By using SopA and SopB proteins deficient in DNA binding, we have found that the intrinsic ability of SopA to hydrolyze ATP requires direct DNA binding by SopA but not by SopB. Our results show that two independent interactions of SopA act in synergy to stimulate its ATPase. SopA must interact with (i) DNA, through its ATP-dependent nonspecific DNA binding domain and (ii) SopB, which we show here to provide an arginine-finger motif. In addition, the latter interaction stimulates ATPase maximally when SopB is part of the partition complex. Hence, our data demonstrate that DNA acts on SopA in two ways, directly as nonspecific DNA and through SopB as centromeric DNA, to fully activate SopA ATP hydrolysis.Faithful segregation of low copy number plasmids in bacteria depends on partition loci, named Par. Such loci are composed of two genes, generically termed parA and parB, encoding an ATPase and a DNA-binding protein, respectively, and a cis-acting centromeric site parS (reviewed in Ref. 1). These three essential elements are sufficient for the partition process. ParBs assemble on parS to form nucleoprotein structures called partition complexes (2–6). ParA ATPases are considered to be motors that direct displacement and positioning of partition complexes inside the cell.Partition systems have been classified into two major types, distinguished by the nature of their ATPase proteins (7). Type I is characterized by Walker box ATPases, which are specified by many plasmids and most bacterial chromosomes. In some (Type Ia) the nucleotide-binding P-loop is preceded by an N-terminal regulatory domain, in the others (Type Ib) it is not. Type II specifies actin-like ATPases and is present on relatively few plasmids. It is presently the best understood system at the molecular level (8–10). However, the underlying mechanism that drives partition still remains elusive for both systems. Our work aims at the understanding of an archetypal representative of Type Ia, namely SopABC of the Escherichia coli plasmid F.The several activities of Type Ia ParA proteins are regulated by binding of adenine nucleotides (11, 12), which induce conformational changes in the proteins (13, 14). In their apo and/or ADP-bound forms these proteins display site-specific DNA binding activity, recognizing their cognate promoters through their N-terminal domains. Such activity is involved in the autoregulation of par operon expression (15, 16). In the ATP-bound form, they specifically interact with cognate partition complexes through contact with ParB proteins. The ATP-bound form of type I ParAs spontaneously forms polymers, which appear as bundled filaments in electron micrographs (12, 17–19). The role of these filaments is not understood but they could be related to the rapid movement of partition complexes in the cell. In vivo, ParA proteins form dynamic assemblies that move back and forth in the cell if the cognate ParB protein and parS centromere are present (20–23). The link between this oscillatory behavior and the segregation of partition complexes is not clear. They both require the ATPase activity of ParA proteins but the role of ATP hydrolysis in the partition process is not understood.It has long been known that ParA partition proteins exhibit low intrinsic ATPase activity (24, 25). ATP hydrolysis is modestly stimulated by either DNA or the cognate ParB alone but is strongly activated (up to 35-fold) when both DNA and ParBs are present (12, 24, 25). The lack of major stimulation of ATPase by DNA in the absence of ParB proteins has been taken to mean that the DNA-bound form of ParB is the effective activator (26). However, incorporation of centromere sites in the DNA added to ParB did not increase stimulation of ATPase (24, 25), leaving doubts as to the role of the partition complex in ATPase activation.The mechanism by which ATP hydrolysis acts in the partition process is not known for type I systems. This is in marked contrast to actin-based partition ATPases whose ATPase activity is stimulated in growing filaments (8), where it provokes the rapid disassembly of filaments unless these are capped by the cognate partition complex (9). Therefore, for the type II partition system, ATP hydrolysis ensures discrimination between unproductive filaments that are rapidly disassembled and productive filaments that drive partition complexes to opposite ends of the cell. This dynamic instability, which ensures elongation of actin-like filaments only between two partition complexes to be segregated, thus provides regulation of the partition process.Recently, it has been shown that two members of the type I ParA family, Soj of Thermus thermophilus and SopA of plasmid F, bind nonspecific DNA in the presence of ATP (12, 26). Two studies revealed that this DNA binding activity is essential for partition (27, 28). Importantly, it has been shown that a SopA mutant deficient in DNA binding no longer stimulates ATP hydrolysis efficiently, suggesting that DNA could play a direct role in the regulation of the ATPase activity (28). This finding raises the issue of the interactions required for activation of the type I partition ATPase activity by cognate proteins and DNA.In this study, we have investigated the mechanism of activation of ATP hydrolysis by SopA. First, we have found that the formation of the F partition complex is required for strong stimulation of the SopA intrinsic ATPase activity. We have also found that the partition complex and DNA stimulate ATP hydrolysis independently but that these two independent interactions act in synergy to amplify SopA ATPase activity. Lastly, we have identified an arginine finger motif in SopB responsible for the stimulation of SopA ATPase activity.     

Autoregulation of the partition genes of the mini-F plasmid and the intracellular localization of their products in Escherichia coli

The sopAB operon and the sopC sequence, which acts as a centromere, are essential for stable maintenance of the mini-F plasmid. Immunoprecipitation experiments with purified SopA and SopB proteins have demonstrated that these proteins interact in vitro. Expression studies using the lacZ gene as a reporter revealed that the sopAB operon is repressed by the cooperative action of SopA and SopB. Using immunofluorescence microscopy, we found discrete fluorescent foci of SopA and SopB in cells that produce both SopA and SopB in the presence of the sopC DNA segment, but not in the absence of sopC, suggesting the SopA-SopB complex binds to sopC segments. SopA was exclusively found to colocalize with nucleoids in cells that produced only SopA, while, in the absence of SopA, SopB was distributed in the cytosolic spaces. Received: 14 July 1997 / Accepted: 3 October 1997     

ATPase activity of SopA, a protein essential for active partitioning of F plasmid

Summary The SopA, B, C genes of the F plasmid play an essential role in plasmid partitioning during cell division in Escherichia coli. In this paper, the products of the sopA and sopB genes were isolated and their biochemical activities studied. [-³²P]ATP was cross-linked to the SopA protein by UV irradiation; this cross-linking was observed only in the presence of magnesium ion, and was competitively inhibited in the presence of non-radioactive ATP, ADP and dATP, but not other NTPs or dNTPs. In contrast, no ATP binding activity was detected for the SopB protein. The SopA protein showed a modest magnesium ion-dependent ATPase activity and this activity was stimulated in the presence of DNA. The ATPase activity in the presence of DNA was further stimulated by addition of the SopB protein. However, the SopB protein alone failed to stimulate the ATPase activity.     

Mapping of functional domains in F plasmid partition proteins reveals a bipartite SopB-recognition domain in SopA

Active partition of the F plasmid to dividing daughter cells is assured by interactions between proteins SopA and SopB, and a centromere, sopC. A close homologue of the sop operon is present in the linear prophage N15 and, together with sopC-like sequences, it ensures stability of this replicon. We have exploited this sequence similarity to construct hybrid sop operons with the aim of locating specific interaction determinants within the SopA and SopB proteins that are needed for partition function and for autoregulation of sopAB expression. Centromere binding was found to be specified entirely by a central 25 residue region of SopB strongly predicted to form a helix-turn-helix structure. SopB protein also carries a species-specific SopA-interaction determinant within its N-terminal 45 amino acids, and, as shown by Escherichia coli two-hybrid analysis, a dimerization domain within its C-terminal 75 (F) or 97 (N15) residues. Promoter-operator binding specificity was located within an N-terminal 66 residue region of SopA, which is predicted to contain a helix-turn-helix motif. Two other regions of SopA protein, one next to the ATPase Walker A-box, the other C-terminal, specify interaction with SopB. Yeast two-hybrid analysis indicated that these regions contact SopB directly. Evidence for the involvement of the SopA N terminus in autoinhibition of SopA function was obtained, revealing a possible new aspect of the role of SopB in SopA activation.     

Insight into F plasmid DNA segregation revealed by structures of SopB and SopB–DNA complexes

Accurate DNA segregation is essential for genome transmission. Segregation of the prototypical F plasmid requires the centromere-binding protein SopB, the NTPase SopA and the sopC centromere. SopB displays an intriguing range of DNA-binding properties essential for partition; it binds sopC to form a partition complex, which recruits SopA, and it also coats DNA to prevent non-specific SopA–DNA interactions, which inhibits SopA polymerization. To understand the myriad functions of SopB, we determined a series of SopB–DNA crystal structures. SopB does not distort its DNA site and our data suggest that SopB–sopC forms an extended rather than wrapped partition complex with the SopA-interacting domains aligned on one face. SopB is a multidomain protein, which like P1 ParB contains an all-helical DNA-binding domain that is flexibly attached to a compact (β₃–α)₂ dimer-domain. Unlike P1 ParB, the SopB dimer-domain does not bind DNA. Moreover, SopB contains a unique secondary dimerization motif that bridges between DNA duplexes. Both specific and non-specific SopB–DNA bridging structures were observed. This DNA-linking function suggests a novel mechanism for in trans DNA spreading by SopB, explaining how it might mask DNA to prevent DNA-mediated inhibition of SopA polymerization.     

Partition of the linear plasmid N15: interactions of N15 partition functions with the sop locus of the F plasmid

A locus close to one end of the linear N15 prophage closely resembles the sop operon which governs partition of the F plasmid; the promoter region contains similar operator sites, and the two putative gene products have extensive amino acid identity with the SopA and -B proteins of F. Our aim was to ascertain whether the N15 sop homologue functions in partition, to identify the centromere site, and to examine possible interchangeability of function with the F Sop system. When expressed at a moderate level, N15 SopA and -B proteins partly stabilize mini-F which lacks its own sop operon but retains the sopC centromere. The stabilization does not depend on increased copy number. Likewise, an N15 mutant with most of its sop operon deleted is partly stabilized by F Sop proteins and fully stabilized by its own. Four inverted repeat sequences similar to those of sopC were located in N15. They are distant from the sop operon and from each other. Two of these were shown to stabilize a mini-F sop deletion mutant when N15 Sop proteins were provided. Provision of the SopA homologue to plasmids with a sopA deletion resulted in further destabilization of the plasmid. The N15 Sop proteins exert effective, but incomplete, repression at the F sop promoter. We conclude that the N15 sop locus determines stable inheritance of the prophage by using dispersed centromere sites. The SopB-centromere and SopA-operator interactions show partial functional overlap between N15 and F. SopA of each plasmid appears to interact with SopB of the other, but in a way that is detrimental to plasmid maintenance.     

Subcellular positioning of F plasmid mediated by dynamic localization of SopA and SopB

SopA, SopB proteins and the cis-acting sopC DNA region of F plasmid are essential for partitioning of the plasmid, ensuring proper subcellular positioning of the plasmid DNA molecules. We have analyzed by immunofluorescence microscopy the subcellular localization of SopA and SopB. The majority of SopB molecules formed foci, which localized frequently with F plasmid DNA molecules. The foci increased in number in proportion to the cell length. Interestingly, beside the foci formation, SopB formed a spiral structure that was dependent on SopA, which also formed a spiral structure, independent of the presence of SopB, and these two structures partially overlapped. On the basis of these results and previous biochemical studies together with our simulations, we propose a theoretical model named "the reaction-diffusion partitioning model", using reaction-diffusion equations that explain the dynamic subcellular localization of SopA and SopB proteins and the subcellular positioning of F plasmid. We hypothesized that sister copies of plasmid DNA compete with each other for sites at which SopB multimer is at the optimum concentration. The plasmid incompatibility mediated by the Sop system might be explained clearly by this hypothesis.     

Identification of a partition region carried by the plasmid QpH1 of Coxiella burnetii

Coxiella burnetii is an intracellular bacterial pathogen which causes Q fever in humans and other animals. Most of the isolates found carry plasmids which share considerable homology. Unfortunately all of these plasmids remain cryptic. Initial attempts to look for secreted or membrane proteins encoded by these plasmids using TnphoA mutagenesis revealed an open reading frame on the EcoRI-fragment C of the plasmid QpH1. Upstream DNA sequencing of the TnphoA insertions revealed a deduced peptide sequence with homology to the SopA protein which is encoded by the F plasmid in Escherichia coli. Maxi-cell analysis showed that fragment C encoded two proteins: one was 43.5 kDa in size and designated QsopA, and a second was 38 kDa in size. These proteins are similar in molecular weight to the SopA and SopB proteins, which are essential components of the partition mechanism of the F plasmid. The region appears to be conserved in plasmids QpRS, QpDV, and QpDG, but is absent in a plasmidless isolate in which plasmid sequences have integrated into the chromosomal DNA. Complementation studies demonstrated that fragment C has a plasmid partitioning function and can restore maintenance stability of the partition-defective mini-F plasmid. These data suggest that fragment C carries the plasmid partition region of the plasmid QpH1.     

Probing plasmid partition with centromere-based incompatibility

Low-copy number plasmids of bacteria rely on specific centromeres for regular partition into daughter cells. When also present on a second plasmid, the centromere can render the two plasmids incompatible, disrupting partition and causing plasmid loss. We have investigated the basis of incompatibility exerted by the F plasmid centromere, sopC, to probe the mechanism of partition. Measurements of the effects of sopC at various gene dosages on destabilization of mini-F, on repression of the sopAB operon and on occupancy of mini-F DNA by the centromere-binding protein, SopB, revealed that among mechanisms previously proposed, no single one fully explained incompatibility. sopC on multicopy plasmids depleted SopB by titration and by contributing to repression. The resulting SopB deficit is proposed to delay partition complex formation and facilitate pairing between mini-F and the centromere vector, thereby increasing randomization of segregation. Unexpectedly, sopC on mini-P1 exerted strong incompatibility if the P1 parABS locus was absent. A mutation preventing the P1 replication initiation protein from pairing (handcuffing) reduced this strong incompatibility to the level expected for random segregation. The results indicate the importance of kinetic considerations and suggest that mini-F handcuffing promotes pairing of SopB-sopC complexes that can subsequently segregate as intact aggregates.     

Oscillating focus of SopA associated with filamentous structure guides partitioning of F plasmid

The F plasmid is actively partitioned to daughter cells by the sopABC gene. To elucidate the partitioning mechanisms, we simultaneously analysed movements of the plasmid and the SopA ATPase in single living cells. SopA, which is a putative motor protein assembled densely near nucleoid borders and formed a single discrete focus associated with less dense filamentous distribution along the long axis of the cell. The dense SopA focus oscillates between cell poles. The direction of the plasmid motion switches as the SopA focus switches its position. The velocity of the plasmid motion stays constant while it oscillates moving towards the SopA focus. The low density filamentous distribution of SopA persisted throughout the SopA oscillation. The focus associated with filamentous distribution of SopA was also observed in a cell without nucleoid. The SopA filament may guide the movement of the plasmid as a railway track and lead it to cell quarters.     

ParA‐mediated plasmid partition driven by protein pattern self‐organization

DNA segregation ensures the stable inheritance of genetic material prior to cell division. Many bacterial chromosomes and low‐copy plasmids, such as the plasmids P1 and F, employ a three‐component system to partition replicated genomes: a partition site on the DNA target, typically called parS, a partition site binding protein, typically called ParB, and a Walker‐type ATPase, typically called ParA, which also binds non‐specific DNA. In vivo, the ParA family of ATPases forms dynamic patterns over the nucleoid, but how ATP‐driven patterning is involved in partition is unknown. We reconstituted and visualized ParA‐mediated plasmid partition inside a DNA‐carpeted flowcell, which acts as an artificial nucleoid. ParA and ParB transiently bridged plasmid to the DNA carpet. ParB‐stimulated ATP hydrolysis by ParA resulted in ParA disassembly from the bridging complex and from the surrounding DNA carpet, which led to plasmid detachment. Our results support a diffusion‐ratchet model, where ParB on the plasmid chases and redistributes the ParA gradient on the nucleoid, which in turn mobilizes the plasmid.     

ATP-regulated interactions between P1 ParA, ParB and non-specific DNA that are stabilized by the plasmid partition site, parS

Localization of the P1 plasmid requires two proteins, ParA and ParB, which act on the plasmid partition site, parS. ParB is a site-specific DNA-binding protein and ParA is a Walker-type ATPase with non-specific DNA-binding activity. In vivo ParA binds the bacterial nucleoid and forms dynamic patterns that are governed by the ParB-parS partition complex on the plasmid. How these interactions drive plasmid movement and localization is not well understood. Here we have identified a large protein-DNA complex in vitro that requires ParA, ParB and ATP, and have characterized its assembly by sucrose gradient sedimentation and light scattering assays. ATP binding and hydrolysis mediated the assembly and disassembly of this complex, while ADP antagonized complex formation. The complex was not dependent on, but was stabilized by, parS. The properties indicate that ParA and ParB are binding and bridging multiple DNA molecules to create a large meshwork of protein-DNA molecules that involves both specific and non-specific DNA. We propose that this complex represents a dynamic adaptor complex between the plasmid and nucleoid, and further, that this interaction drives the redistribution of partition proteins and the plasmid over the nucleoid during partition.     

Purification and characterization of SopA and SopB proteins essential for F plasmid partitioning

Mini-F plasmid has the trans-acting genes sopA and sopB and the cis-acting site sopC which are essential for accurate partitioning of plasmid DNA molecules into both daughter cells. In this study, we purified independently SopA and SopB proteins, analyzed the in vitro DNA-binding activity of these proteins by the gel retardation assay, and determined the precise binding sites of DNA by the footprinting method. SopA binds to four repeated sequences (CTTTGC) located in the promoter-operator region of the sopAB operon. The SopA binding activity is enhanced by the addition of SopB protein. SopB protein itself does not bind to this DNA region. These results suggest that the complex of SopA and SopB proteins autoregulate the expression of the sopA-sopB operon. On the other hand, SopB protein binds to the sopC region, in which 12 direct repeats of 43-base pairs nucleotides exist. SopB protein recognizes the inverted repeats of 7 base pairs in each direct repeats. SopA protein does not affect the SopB binding activity to the sopC DNA segment.