Signaling by estrogens and tamoxifen in the human endometrium

Tamoxifen is used as adjuvant treatment for postmenopausal breast cancer patients. The mechanism of action of tamoxifen in breast cancer patients is that tamoxifen inhibits growth of cancer cells by competitive antagonism for estrogens at the estrogen receptor (ER). In the endometrium, tamoxifen has an effect that varies with the ambient concentration of estrogen: in premenopausal women (high estrogen levels), tamoxifen displays an estrogen-antagonistic effect, while in postmenopausal women (low estrogen levels), tamoxifen displays an estrogen-agonistic mode of action. Here, using microarray technology we have compared estrogen signaling with tamoxifen signaling in the human endometrium. It was observed that on the one hand tamoxifen-treatment results in modulation of expression of specific genes (370 genes) and on the other hand tamoxifen-treatment results in modulation of a set of genes which are also regulated by estrogen treatment (142 genes). Upon focusing on regulation of proliferation, we found that tamoxifen-induced endometrial proliferation is largely accomplished by using the same set of genes as are regulated by estradiol. So, as far as regulation of proliferation goes, tamoxifen seems to act as estrogen agonist. Furthermore, tamoxifen-specific gene regulation may explain why tamoxifen-induced endometrial tumors behave more aggressively than sporadic endometrial tumors.     

A non-functional retinoblastoma tumor suppressor (RB) pathway in premenopausal breast cancer is associated with resistance to tamoxifen

The retinoblastoma tumor suppressor (RB) is important for retaining cell cycle control and loss of RB function is commonly observed in various malignancies. Experimental and animal studies have shown that RB knockdown in ER+ (estrogen receptor) cell lines and xenografts leads to resistance to tamoxifen, indicating that RB-inactivation could be linked to impaired response to specific cancer treatments. To address this issue, we utilized a unique randomized trial including 500 premenopausal breast cancer patients receiving either two years of adjuvant tamoxifen treatment or no treatment after surgery, and defined the tamoxifen response in RB-subgroups. Non-functional RB tumors were defined by lack of concordance between RB-phosphorylation and proliferation, in comparison to RB-functional tumors displaying comparable RB-phosphorylation and proliferation. In the ER+ tumors harboring a functional RB pathway (N=204), patients benefited from adjuvant tamoxifen with fewer breast cancer recurrences (HR=0.53, 95% CI 0.34-0.81, P=0.003). In the small subgroup of ER+ and RB non-functional tumors there was no benefit of tamoxifen (HR=2.28, 95% CI 0.51-10.3, P=0.28). In a multivariate analysis, the interaction between status of the RB pathway and treatment was significant (P=0.010), validating that despite being a small subgroup of ER+ breast cancer, RB functional status appears to be linked to response to tamoxifen treatment. These findings are in line with earlier experimental data altogether suggesting that analyses of RB status in breast cancer have the potential to be one among other future predictive factors that needs to be analyzed in order to successfully identify patients that will benefit from tamoxifen treatment.     

Strategies for breast cancer therapy with antiestrogens

Current clinical research is focused upon the application of adjuvant therapy for the treatment of breast cancer. Combination chemotherapy is the most successful adjuvant therapy for premenopausal patients whereas the antiestrogen tamoxifen (1 or 2 yr) is successful in postmenopausal disease. We have developed a unifying strategy for the treatment of breast cancer. The thesis is based upon the application of continuous adjuvant therapy with tamoxifen in a low estrogen environment. Chemotherapy causes a chemical castration in premenopausal patients. In contrast, tamoxifen causes an increase in steroidogenesis. A combination of both approaches will work against each other until ovarian failure occurs. Patients should be checked for castration to provide a low estrogen environment in which tamoxifen, a competitive antagonist of estrogen action, can effectively work. Laboratory evidence using carcinogen-induced rat mammary tumor models demonstrates the efficacy of long-term therapy. Studies with the human breast cell line MCF-7 grown in athymic mice show that tamoxifen is a tumoristatic agent so that once the therapy is stopped, tumors can be regrown by estrogen administration. Patients should receive continuous tamoxifen therapy to prevent the growth-stimulating effects of adrenal steroids, environmental and phyto-estrogens.     

The Prognostic Significance of Wnt-5a Expression in Primary Breast Cancer Is Extended to Premenopausal Women

Wnt-5a protein expression in primary tumors from unselected breast cancer patients has revealed a tumor suppressive function of the protein. However, in vitro experiments on human breast cancer cells have reported contradictory results, indicating both a tumor suppressive and promoting functions of Wnt-5a. This could be due to various functions of Wnt-5a in different subgroups of patients. The unselected cohorts analyzed to date for Wnt-5a protein expression contained few premenopausal patients. The aim of the present investigation was to evaluate the prognostic significance of Wnt-5a protein expression in a cohort of premenopausal women with comprehensive data on biomarkers, molecular subtypes and long-term outcome. In a randomized trial of adjuvant tamoxifen versus no adjuvant treatment, 564 premenopausal primary breast cancer patients were included. The median follow-up time was 14 years. A tumor tissue array was constructed and 361 samples were evaluated for Wnt-5a reactivity by immunohistochemistry. The primary end-point was recurrence-free survival. Wnt-5a protein expression was reduced or lost in 146/361 of tumors and correlated to younger age, estrogen receptor (ER) negativity and triple-negative phenotype. Wnt-5a was a prognostic factor in the whole cohort (p = 0.003). In patients with ER-positive tumors, Wnt-5a was an independent positive prognostic marker (HR 0.51 95% CI: 0.33–0.78 p = 0.002) and HER2 a negative prognostic marker (HR 2.84 95% CI: 1.51–5.31, p = 0.001) in a Cox multivariate analysis adjusted for standard prognostic markers and tamoxifen treatment. In the ER-negative subset, Wnt-5a added no prognostic information. In a subgroup analysis, Wnt-5a was significantly associated with better prognosis in patients with Luminal A tumors (p = 0.04). Conclusively, our results suggest that loss of Wnt-5a is a valuable prognostic marker in premenopausal breast cancer patients in particular in patients with ER-positive tumors and out-performed conventional prognostic factors in this subset of patients.     

Multi-gene fluorescence in situ hybridization to detect cell cycle gene copy number aberrations in young breast cancer patients

Breast cancer is a disease of cell cycle, and the dysfunction of cell cycle checkpoints plays a vital role in the occurrence and development of breast cancer. We employed multi-gene fluorescence in situ hybridization (M-FISH) to investigate gene copy number aberrations (CNAs) of 4 genes (Rb1, CHEK2, c-Myc, CCND1) that are involved in the regulation of cell cycle, in order to analyze the impact of gene aberrations on prognosis in the young breast cancer patients. Gene copy number aberrations of these 4 genes were more frequently observed in young breast cancer patients when compared with the older group. Further, these CNAs were more frequently seen in Luminal B type, Her2 overexpression, and tiple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) type in young breast cancer patients. The variations of CCND1, Rb1, and CHEK2 were significantly correlated with poor survival in the young breast cancer patient group, while the amplification of c-Myc was not obviously correlated with poor survival in young breast cancer patients. Thus, gene copy number aberrations (CNAs) of cell cycle-regulated genes can serve as an important tool for prognosis in young breast cancer patients.     

The consequences of exhaustive antiestrogen therapy in breast cancer: estrogen-induced tumor cell death

Forty years ago, the endocrine treatment for breast cancer was a last resort at palliation before the disease overwhelmed the patient (1). Ovarian ablation was the treatment of choice for the premenopausal patient, whereas either adrenalectomy or, paradoxically, high-dose synthetic estrogen therapy were used for treatment in postmenopausal patients. A reduction or an excess of estrogen provoked objective responses in one out of three women. Unfortunately, there was no way of predicting who would respond to endocrine ablation, and because so few patients responded there was no enthusiasm for developing new endocrine agents. All hopes for a cure for breast cancer turned to appropriate combinations of cytotoxic chemotherapy. Today tamoxifen, a nonsteroidal antiestrogen (2), has proven to be effective in all stages of premenopausal and postmenopausal breast cancer, and several new endocrine strategies, including aromatase inhibitors, luteinizing-hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) superagonists, and a pure antiestrogen (fulvestrant), are now available for breast cancer treatment. Additionally, tamoxifen and raloxifene, a related compound, are used to reduce the risk of breast cancer and osteoporosis, respectively, in high-risk groups (3). Hormonal modulation and strategies to prevent the actions of estrogen in the breast are ubiquitous. However, with successful changes in treatment strategies comes the consequence of change. This minireview will describe the current strategies for the treatment and prevention of breast cancer and present emerging new concepts about the consequences of exhaustive antiestrogen treatment on therapeutic resistance.     

Summary of aromatase inhibitor trials: the past and future

Antagonizing estrogen by inhibition of aromatase has become a mainstay of adjuvant endocrine therapy in women with hormone receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer. Recent trials have shown an incremental gain for the AIs over tamoxifen when given as an up-front alternative to tamoxifen, but additionally added benefit is achieved by giving them in sequence with tamoxifen after either an early switch (2–3 years) or as a late switch (5 years). The true clinical implications of accelerated bone resorption from AIs is becoming better understood and its management defined. AI minimally effect quality of life. The chronic relapsing nature of ER+ breast cancer implies long term therapy will be of benefit in selected patients. Outstanding issues under investigation include optimal duration of endocrine therapy, optimal sequence, optimal agents and whether combining anti-estrogens will yield advantage. The role of AIs is also under investigation in premenopausal women in combination with ovarian function suppression. Identifying prognostic and predictive factors of endocrine therapy is important as is the identification and overcoming of resistance mechanisms. Both tumor and host signatures are being pursued to this end. Optimizing, expanding and extending endocrine therapy is likely to add further to patient outcome.     

Breast cancer prevention--clinical trials strategies involving aromatase inhibitors

Estrogens and their metabolites have been implicated in both the initiation and the prevention of breast cancer. The reduction in breast cancer incidence seen in the tamoxifen arms of the four prospective trials to date has established the proof of principle that antagonizing estrogen is a potential means of reducing breast cancer risk. However, the areas to improve on these results include: (a) enhanced efficacy, (b) reduction in the incidence of receptor-negative tumors, (c) improved overall and endocrinological side effects, and (d) improved function on end-organs other than the breast. The aromatase inhibitors offer the potential to achieve these goals in part in the following ways: (a) greater reduction in risk of disease as evidenced by superior efficacy in advanced breast cancer and by inhibition of both initiation and promotion of breast cancer, (b) reduction in receptor-negative tumors by synergy with COX-2 inhibitors resulting in growth factor inhibition, anti-angiogenesis and inhibition of tumor-associated aromatase expression, (c) fewer vasomotor and urogenital abnormalities, and (d) reduced thromboembolism and cardiovascular complications and satisfactory effects on bone metabolism. Important differences may exist between non-steroidal reversible inhibitors and steroidal irreversible inactivators in particular related to the androgenic/anabolic effects of the steroidal inactivators. Pilot studies of aromatase inhibitors described elsewhere in this session have begun in healthy women with dense mammography, or a high-risk genetic and/or histocytopathologic profile, to determine potential efficacy, as well as effects on end-organ function. A number of phase three trials with aromatase inhibitors are also underway or in planning. Among these are the BRCA 1 and 2 study of exemestane versus placebo in unaffected postmenopausal carriers, the International Breast Intervention Study 2 (IBIS 2) of anastrozole versus placebo in women with a high-risk profile, and the National Cancer Institute of Canada’s Clinical Trial Group (NCIC CTG) study of exemestane with or without celecoxib versus placebo in women at risk of the disease. For premenopausal women, combination strategies of gonadotrophin agonists and aromatase inhibitors are being investigated. The potential of using low doses of aromatase inhibitors to lower “in breast” estrogen levels without unduly perturbing plasma concentrations is also being explored. The potential of the aromatase gene functioning as an oncogene within the breast may be tied to breast density which in turn may represent both a selection tool for elevated risk and an intermediate marker of prevention. The strong link between postmenopausal estrogen levels and breast cancer risk suggests the possibility that plasma estrogen levels may be a useful intermediate marker of prevention. The aromatase inhibitors offer us the first ever tool to render women virtually free of estrogen and are potentially an exciting tool for the prevention of breast cancer.     

Tamoxifen therapy benefit predictive signature combining with prognostic signature in surgical-only ER-positive breast cancer

Tamoxifen treatment is important assistant for estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer (BRCA) after resection. This study aimed to identify signatures for predicting the prognosis of patients with BRCA after tamoxifen treatment. Data of gene-specific DNA methylation (DM), as well as the corresponding clinical data for the patients with BRCA, were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas and followed by systematic bioinformatics analyses. After mapping these DM CPG sites onto genes, we finally obtained 352 relapse-free survival (RFS) associated DM genes, with which 61,776 gene pairs were combined, including 1,614 gene pairs related to RFS. An 11 gene-pair signature was identified to cluster the 189 patients with BRCA into the surgical low-risk group (136 patients) and high-risk group (53 patients). Then, we further identified a tamoxifen-predictive signature that could classify surgical high-risk patients with significant differences on RFS. Combining surgical-only prognostic signature and tamoxifen-predictive signature, patients were clustered into surgical-only low-risk group, tamoxifen nonbenefit group, and tamoxifen benefit group. In conclusion, we identified that the gene pair PDHA2–APRT could serve as a potential prognostic biomarker for patients with BRCA after tamoxifen treatment.     

Establishment of two basal-like breast cancer cell lines with extremely low tumorigenicity from Taiwanese premenopausal women

The research of carcinogenetic mechanisms of breast cancer in different ethnic backgrounds is an interesting field, as clinical features of breast cancers vary among races. High premenopausal incidence is distinctive in East-Asian breast cancer. However, human cell lines derived from Asian primary breast tumor are rare. To provide alternative cell line models with a relevant genetic background, we aimed to establish breast cancer cell lines from Taiwanese patients of Han-Chinese ethnicity. Fresh tissue from mammary tumors were digested into organoids, plated and grown in basal serum-free medium of human mammary epithelial cells (HuMEC) with supplements. Cells were further enriched by positive selection with CD326 (epithelial cell adhesion molecule; EpCAM)-coated micro-magnetic beads. Two breast cancer cell lines derived from premenopausal women were successfully established by this method, and named Chang-Gung Breast Cancer 01 (CGBC 01) and 02 (CGBC 02). These two cell lines had a similar phenotype with weak expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and without amplification of receptor tyrosine protein kinase erbB-2 (HER2/neu). Genome-wide Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) array showed multiple copy number alterations in both cell lines. Based on gene expression profiles, CGBC 01 and 02 were clustered into basal-like subtype with reference to the breast cancer cell line gene expression database. The tumorigenicity of both cell lines was extremely low in both anchorage-independence assay and transplantation into the mammary fat pads of nude mice. CGBC 01 and CGBC 02 are low tumorigenic breast cancer cell lines, established from Han-Chinese premenopausal breast cancer patients, which serve as in vitro models in studying the biological features of Asian breast cancer.     

Prognostic and predictive value of the urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its inhibitors PAI-1 and PAI-2 in operable breast cancer

The present study on the prognostic and predictive value of serine proteases was conducted in 460 early breast cancer patients mostly treated with some kind of adjuvant systemic therapy: 156 received chemotherapy, 141 hormone therapy and 111 a combination of both. Already in univariate analysis PAI-1 was the only proteolytic factor with a significant impact on DFS, which was retained in multivariate analysis (p = 0.020); PAI-2 showed borderline significance in univariate analysis (p = 0.0503) and uPA did not present as a significant prognostic factor for DFS in our patient series. In a separate univariate analysis of DFS on patient subgroups defined by adjuvant systemic therapy, a higher risk of relapse associated with higher uPA and PAI-1 levels was found in the subgroup of patients who did not receive any treatment; this difference did not reach the level of significance, probably due to the small number (n = 52) of patients in this group (HR 1.37; p = 0.71 and HR 2.14; p = 0.321, respectively). A higher risk of relapse was also found in the subgroup of patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 1.44; p = 0.381 and HR 2.48; p = 0.003, respectively). In contrast, the bad prognostic impact of high uPA and PAI-1 levels was lost in the subgroup of patients treated with adjuvant hormone therapy (HR 0.79; p = 0.693 and HR 0.26; p = 0.204, respectively). The same observations were made for the uPA/PAI-1 combination. Our study confirmed the prognostic value of serine proteases in early breast cancer. In addition, it pointed to a possible predictive value of these tumor markers for response to adjuvant hormone therapy with tamoxifen, which should be confirmed in further studies.     

The role of endocrine therapy in primary breast cancer

A recent overview of the results of all trials of adjuvant chemotherapy suggests a clinically and statistically significant advantage for premenopausal women with positive axillary nodes. The results of the same approach for all other women with early breast cancer are very disappointing. These data suggest that contrary to the original hypothetical model, adjuvant chemotherapy is exerting its effect indirectly via chemical castration. In contrast, the results of trials of adjuvant tamoxifen have been more promising and, again, in contrast to the original premises, it would appear that a modest improvement in survival and delay in recurrence can be achieved amongst all groups of women independent of age, nodal status and oestrogen receptor content of the primary tumour. In order to explain these counter-intuitive observations, it is necessary to elaborate an alternative biological model. This paper describes the current thinking on the mode of action of the "anti-oestrogens" and the possible role of inhibitory growth factors activated indirectly by anti-oestrogens. Future trials of adjuvant systemic therapy for early breast cancer should include studies on the duration of tamoxifen, comparing 2 yr with longer, and a comparison of tamoxifen alone with polychemotherapy for premenopausal node positive patients.     

Identification of novel proteins induced by estradiol, 4-hydroxytamoxifen and acolbifene in T47D breast cancer cells

Tamoxifen is currently used as adjuvant therapy for estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer patients and as a chemopreventative agent. Although ER is a predictive marker for tamoxifen response, ER status fails to predict tamoxifen response in a significant number of patients highlighting the need to identify new pathways for tamoxifen sensitivity/resistance. To identify novel proteins induced by tamoxifen in breast cancer cells sensitive to tamoxifen growth inhibition, two-dimensional (2D) gel electrophoresis was used to profile proteins in T47D breast cancer cells. Six proteins were identified that were differentially regulated by 17beta-estradiol, 4-hydroxytamoxifen and the pure antagonist acolbifene (EM-652); calreticulin, synapse associated protein 1 (SYAP1), CD2 antigen binding protein 2 (CD2BP2), nucleosome assembly protein 1 like 1 (NAP1L1), d-3-phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase (3-PHGDH) and pyridoxine 5' phosphate oxidase (PNPO). At the mRNA level, these ligands differentially regulated expression of mRNAs encoding the identified proteins in T47D and MCF7 cells but had no effect on mRNA in ERalpha-negative MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells. These novel SERM-regulated proteins may participate in new or existing pathways for sensitivity or resistance to SERMs.     

An epigenomic approach to therapy for tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer

Tamoxifen has been a frontline treatment for estrogen receptor alpha (ERα)-positive breast tumors in premenopausal women. However, resistance to tamoxifen occurs in many patients. ER still plays a critical role in the growth of breast cancer cells with acquired tamoxifen resistance, suggesting that ERα remains a valid target for treatment of tamoxifen-resistant (Tam-R) breast cancer. In an effort to identify novel regulators of ERα signaling, through a small-scale siRNA screen against histone methyl modifiers, we found WHSC1, a histone H3K36 methyltransferase, as a positive regulator of ERα signaling in breast cancer cells. We demonstrated that WHSC1 is recruited to the ERα gene by the BET protein BRD3/4, and facilitates ERα gene expression. The small-molecule BET protein inhibitor JQ1 potently suppressed the classic ERα signaling pathway and the growth of Tam-R breast cancer cells in culture. Using a Tam-R breast cancer xenograft mouse model, we demonstrated in vivo anti-breast cancer activity by JQ1 and a strong long-lasting effect of combination therapy with JQ1 and the ER degrader fulvestrant. Taken together, we provide evidence that the epigenomic proteins BRD3/4 and WHSC1 are essential regulators of estrogen receptor signaling and are novel therapeutic targets for treatment of Tam-R breast cancer.     

Sequential adjuvant hormone therapy in postmenopausal breast cancer: rationale and clinical results

For the past 15 years tamoxifen has been the standard adjuvant hormone therapy for women with early-stage breast cancer and estrogen receptor (ER)-positive tumors, irrespective of nodal status and other clinicopathological parameters. Recent studies provided evidence that the optimal duration of tamoxifen treatment is 5 years. Based on the positive clinical results obtained with the administration of aromatase inhibitors (AIs) in the metastatic setting, several controlled clinical trials have evaluated the efficacy and side effects of AIs versus standard tamoxifen also as adjuvant therapy in postmenopausal breast cancer patients. The results of the above studies, suggest a therapeutic advantage of AIs over tamoxifen with regard to relapse-free survival and the risk of metachronous contralateral breast cancer. We review the rationale and the available clinical data on initial or sequential hormone treatment with AIs and we propose a novel scenario for possible therapeutic strategies based on the clinicopathological characteristics of the patients and on the biology of each single tumor.     

Progress in the prevention of breast cancer: concept to reality

In 1936, Professor Antoine Lacassagne suggested that breast cancer could be prevented by developing drugs to block estrogen action in the breast. Jensen discovered the physiologic target, the estrogen receptor, that regulates estrogen action in its target tissues and Lerner discovered the first nonsteroidal antiestrogen MER25. However, the success of tamoxifen as a treatment of breast cancer opened the door for the testing of the worth of tamoxifen to reduce breast cancer incidence in high-risk women. In 1998, Fisher showed that tamoxifen could reduce breast cancer incidence by 50%. Nevertheless, only half the women who develop breast cancer have risk factors other than age, so what can be done for women without risk factors? The recognition that nonsteroidal antiestrogens have the ability to modulate estrogen action selectively has advanced the design and development of new drug for multiple diseases. Tamoxifen and raloxifene maintain bone density and raloxifene is now used to prevent osteoporosis and is being tested as a preventive for coronary heart disease and breast cancer. The drug group is now known as selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) and the challenge is to design new agents for multiple applications. If the 20th century was the era of chemotherapy, the 21st century will be the era of chemoprevention.     

Prognostic Significance of ESR1 Gene Amplification,mRNA/Protein Expression and Functional Profiles in High-Risk Early Breast Cancer: A Translational Study of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG)

Background

Discrepant data have been published on the incidence and prognostic significance of ESR1 gene amplification in early breast cancer.

Patients and Methods

Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor blocks were collected from women with early breast cancer participating in two HeCOG adjuvant trials. Messenger RNA was studied by quantitative PCR, ER protein expression was centrally assessed using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and ESR1 gene copy number by dual fluorescent in situ hybridization probes.

Results

In a total of 1010 women with resected node-positive early breast adenocarcinoma, the tumoral ESR1/CEP6 gene ratio was suggestive of deletion in 159 (15.7%), gene gain in 551 (54.6%) and amplification in 42 cases (4.2%), with only 30 tumors (3%) harboring five or more ESR1 copies. Gene copy number ratio showed a significant, though weak correlation to mRNA and protein expression (Spearman''s Rho <0.23, p = 0.01). ESR1 clusters were observed in 9.5% (57 gain, 38 amplification) of cases. In contrast to mRNA and protein expression, which were favorable prognosticators, gene copy number changes did not obtain prognostic significance. When ESR1/CEP6 gene ratio was combined with function (as defined by ER protein and mRNA expression) in a molecular classifier, the Gene Functional profile, it was functional status that impacted on prognosis. In univariate analysis, patients with functional tumors (positive ER protein expression and gene ratio normal or gain/amplification) fared better than those with non-functional tumors with ESR1 gain (HR for relapse or death 0.49–0.64, p = 0.003). Significant interactions were observed between gene gain/amplification and paclitaxel therapy (trend for DFS benefit from paclitaxel only in patients with ESR1 gain/amplification, p = 0.066) and Gene Functional profile with HER2 amplification (Gene Functional profile prognostic only in HER2-normal cases, p = 0.029).

Conclusions

ESR1 gene deletion and amplification do not constitute per se prognostic markers, instead they can be classified to distinct prognostic groups according to their protein-mediated functional status.     

Risk factors of recurrence in small-sized, node negative breast cancer in young women: a retrospective study in Chinese population

We aimed to investigate risk factors of local and distant recurrence in small-sized, node negative breast cancer in women <35 years in a Chinese cohort. Between January 1994 and January 2007, 107 patients with pathologically confirmed small-sized (?1 cm), node negative breast cancer who did not receive neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy were included. The 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) was estimated according to different prognostic variables. With a median time of 60 months (range, 8–60 months) follow-up, local and distant recurrence were observed in 25 cases (23.4%). By univariate analysis, HER-2 positivity, triple negative (TN), and high Ki-67 index (?14%) were risk factors of a lower RFS (hazard ratio (HR) 6.680, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.350–18.985, P<0.0001 for HER-2 positive; HR 4.769, 95%CI 1.559–14.591, P=0.006 for TN; HR 6.030, 95%CI 2.659–13.674, P<0.0001 for high Ki-67 index). Patients with grade 3 tumors had a lower RFS (HR 2.922, 95%CI 1.096–7.791, P=0.032) compared with those with grade 1 or grade 2 tumors. By multivariate analysis, HER-2 positivity (HR 10.204, 95%CI 3.391–30.704, P<0.0001), TN (HR 10.521, 95% CI 3.152–35.113, P<0.0001) and high Ki-67 index (HR 10.820, 95%CI 4.338–27.002, P<0.0001) remained risk factors of RFS. In this cohort, HER-2 positivity, triple negative and high Ki-67 index were independent risk factors of RFS in young patients with T1a,bN0 breast cancer. Subsequent pregnancy did not affect RFS.     

Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Gene Copy Number Gain in Inflammatory Breast Cancer (IBC): Prevalence,Clinicopathologic Features and Prognostic Implication

Background

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is the most aggressive form of breast cancer, and its molecular pathogenesis still remains to be elucidated. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and implication of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) copy number change in IBC patients.

Methods

We retrospectively collected formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor tissues and medical records of IBC patients from several institutes in Korea. ALK gene copy number change and rearrangement were assessed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay, and ALK expression status was evaluated by immunohistochemical (IHC) staining.

Results

Thirty-six IBC patients including those with HER2 (+) breast cancer (16/36, 44.4%) and triple-negative breast cancer (13/36, 36.1%) were enrolled in this study. ALK copy number gain (CNG) was observed in 47.2% (17/36) of patients, including one patient who harbored ALK gene amplification. ALK CNG (+) patients showed significantly worse overall survival compared to ALK CNG (-) patients in univariate analysis (24.9 months vs. 38.1 months, p = 0.033). Recurrence free survival (RFS) after curative mastectomy was also significantly shorter in ALK CNG (+) patients than in ALK CNG (-) patients (n = 22, 12.7 months vs. 43.3 months, p = 0.016). Multivariate Cox regression analysis with adjustment for HER2 and ER statuses showed significantly poorer RFS for ALK CNG (+) patients (HR 5.63, 95% CI 1.11–28.44, p = 0.037).

Conclusion

This study shows a significant presence of ALK CNG in IBC patients, and ALK CNG was associated with significantly poorer RFS.     

'Arimidex' (anastrozole) versus tamoxifen as adjuvant therapy in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer--efficacy overview

ATAC, a randomized, double-blind trial, compared tamoxifen (20 mg) with anastrozole (‘Arimidex’) (1 mg) alone, and the combination of anastrozole plus tamoxifen (combination), as adjuvant endocrine treatment for postmenopausal patients with early breast cancer. Patients with operable invasive breast cancer following completion of primary therapy, who were candidates to receive adjuvant endocrine therapy, were eligible for this study. Primary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS) and tolerability. Other endpoints included time to recurrence (TTR: censoring non-breast cancer deaths before recurrence) and the incidence of contralateral breast cancer. A total of 9366 patients were included in this study (N=3125, 3116 and 3125 for anastrozole, tamoxifen and the combination, respectively). Median duration of therapy was 30.7 months and median follow-up was 33.3 months. The total numbers of events were 317, 379 and 383 for anastrozole, tamoxifen and the combination, respectively. DFS was significantly improved in the overall population for anastrozole versus tamoxifen (hazard ratio (HR)=0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.71–0.96), P=0.013). Anastrozole showed improved TTR compared with tamoxifen (HR=0.79, CI (0.67–0.94), P=0.008), which improved even further in the ER+ and/or PR+ subgroup (HR=0.73, CI (0.59–0.90), P=0.003). The incidences of hot flushes, thromboembolic events, ischaemic cerebrovascular events, vaginal bleeding/discharge and endometrial cancer were significantly reduced with anastrozole compared with tamoxifen (P<0.03 for all). Musculoskeletal disorders and fractures were significantly reduced in patients receiving tamoxifen compared with those on anastrozole (P<0.03 for both). No increase in hip fractures was seen for anastrozole versus tamoxifen (11 versus 13, respectively). Combination treatment was equivalent to tamoxifen in terms of both efficacy and tolerability. Anastrozole showed superior efficacy to tamoxifen for DFS, TTR and contralateral breast cancer. Early findings show anastrozole to be an effective and well-tolerated endocrine option for the treatment of postmenopausal patients with early breast cancer. For the first time a choice now exists for adjuvant endocrine treatment for postmenopausal women with hormone responsive tumours. Longer follow-up will further define the benefit/risk of anastrozole adjuvant therapy.