Inducible UV repair potential of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO

Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO lacks UV-inducible Weigle reactivation and Weigle mutagenesis of UV-damaged bacteriophages. This lack of UV-inducible, error-prone DNA repair appears to be due to the absence of efficiently expressed umuDC-like genes in this species. When the P. aeruginosa recA gene is introduced into a recA(Def) mutant of Escherichia coli K12, the P. aeruginosa recA gene product is capable of mediating UV-induced mutagenesis, indicating that it could participate in a recA-lexA-like regulatory network and function in inducible DNA repair pathways if such existed in P. aeruginosa. The presence of the IncP9, UV-resistance plasmid R2 in RecA+ strains of P. aeruginosa PAO allows UV-inducible, mutagenic DNA repair of UV-irradiated bacteriophages. R2 also greatly stimulates the ability of UV radiation to induce mutagenesis of the bacterial chromosome. When R2 is introduced into P. aeruginosa strains containing either the recA908 or recA102 mutation, plasmid-mediated UV resistance and Weigle reactivation are not observed. These observations suggest that the increased protection afforded to P. aeruginosa by R2 is derived from a RecA-mediated, DNA-damage-inducible, error-prone DNA repair system which complements the lack of a chromosomally encoded umuDC-like operon.     

Error-prone SOS repair can be error-free

Most of the mutagenesis that accompanies the SOS repair of ultraviolet light-induced lesions in the single-stranded DNA of phage S13 is eliminated when the groES or the groEL gene of Escherichia coli is defective. Therefore, this SOS mutagenesis is not a necessary consequence of what is commonly called error-prone repair, but is additionally imposed on the repair system by the GroE heat shock proteins, which are responsible for the assembly of polypeptides into multimeric structures.     

Inducible SOS response system of DNA repair and mutagenesis in Escherichia coli

Chromosomal DNA is exposed to continuous damage and repair. Cells contain a number of proteins and specific DNA repair systems that help maintain its correct structure. The SOS response was the first DNA repair system described in Escherichia coli induced upon treatment of bacteria with DNA damaging agents arrest DNA replication and cell division. Induction of the SOS response involves more than forty independent SOS genes, most of which encode proteins engaged in protection, repair, replication, mutagenesis and metabolism of DNA. Under normal growth conditions the SOS genes are expressed at a basal level, which increases distinctly upon induction of the SOS response. The SOS-response has been found in many bacterial species (e.g., Salmonella typhimurium, Caulobacter crescentus, Mycobacterium tuberculosis), but not in eukaryotic cells. However, species from all kingdoms contain some SOS-like proteins taking part in DNA repair that exhibit amino acid homology and enzymatic activities related to those found in E. coli. but are not organized in an SOS system. This paper presents a brief up-to-date review describing the discovery of the SOS system, the physiology of SOS induction, methods for its determination, and the role of some SOS-induced genes.     

Evidence that UV-inducible error-prone repair is absent in Haemophilus influenzae Rd, with a discussion of the relation to error-prone repair of alkylating-agent damage.

Haemophilus influenzae Rd and its derivatives are mutated either not at all or to only a very small extent by ultraviolet (UV) radiation, X-rays, methyl methanesulfonate, and nitrogen mustard, though they are readily mutated by such agents as N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine, ethyl methanesulfonate, and nitrosocarbaryl. In these respects H. influenzae Rd resembles the lexA mutants of Escherichia coli that lack the SOS or reclex UV-inducible error-prone repair system. This similarity is further brought out by the observation that chloramphenicol has little or no effect on post-replication repair after UV irradiation. In E. coli, chloramphenicol has been reported to considerably inhibit post-replication repair in the wild type but not in the lexA mutant. Earlier work has suggested that most or all the mutations induced in H. influenzae by NC result from error-prone repair. Combined treatment with NC and either X-rays or UV shows that the NC error-prone repair system does not produce mutations from the lesions induced by these radiations even while it is producing them from its own lesions. It is concluded that the NC error-prone repair system or systems and the reclex error-prone system are different.     

Specific in vivo protein-protein interactions between Escherichia coli SOS mutagenesis proteins.

One of the components of the RecA-LexA-controlled SOS response in Escherichia coli cells is an inducible error-prone DNA replication pathway that results in a substantial increase in the mutation rate. It is believed that error-prone DNA synthesis is performed by a multiprotein complex that is formed by UmuC, UmuD', RecA, and probably DNA polymerase III holoenzyme. It is postulated that the formation of such a complex requires specific interactions between these proteins. We have analyzed the specific protein-protein interactions between UmuC, UmuD, and UmuD' fusion proteins, using a Saccharomyces cerevisiae two-hybrid system. In agreement with previous in vitro data, we have shown that UmuD and UmuD' are able to form both homodimers (UmuD-UmuD and UmuD'-UmuD') and a heterodimer (UmuD-UmuD'). Our data show that UmuC fusion protein is capable of interacting exclusively with UmuD' and not with UmuD. Thus, posttranslational processing of UmuD into UmuD' is a critical step in SOS mutagenesis, enabling only the latter protein to interact with UmuC. Our data seem to indicate that the integrity of the entire UmuC sequence is essential for UmuC-UmuD' heterotypic interaction. Finally, in our studies, we used three different UmuC mutant proteins: UmuC25, UmuC36, and UmuC104. We have found that UmuC25 and UmuC36 are not capable of associating with UmuD'. In contrast, UmuC104 protein interacts with UmuD' protein with an efficiency identical to that of the wild-type protein. We postulate that UmuC104 protein might be defective in interaction with another, unknown protein essential for the SOS mutagenesis pathway.     

Overlapping functions for recF and priA in cell viability and UV-inducible SOS expression are distinguished by dnaC809 in Escherichia coli K-12

The recF and priA genes have roles in DNA repair and homologous recombination. Mutations in these genes also cause decreases in cell viability and alterations in UV-inducible sulAp–lacZ (SOS) expression. To find out if the two genes are in the same or different pathways for viability and SOS expression, the phenotypes of the double mutant strains were studied. The recF priA double mutant showed a lower viability and SOS expression level than either of the single mutants. In the case of cell viability, recF missense mutations decreased viability of a priA2 :: kan strain two to fivefold whereas recF null priA2 :: kan double mutants were not viable at all. dnaC809 , a mutation that suppresses the UV-sensitive (UV^S) and Rec⁻ phenotypes of priA2 :: kan , restored cell viability, but not UV-inducible SOS expression, to a priA recF strain. Since recF is epistatic with recO and recR ( recOR ) for UV resistance, recOR mutations were also tested with priA2 :: kan . No overlap was found between recOR and priA for viability and SOS expression. It is concluded that priA and recF have two different overlapping functions in viability and SOS expression that are distinguishable by the effects of dnaC809 . The role of recF in a priA2 :: kan strain in cell viability is a new function for recF and unlike recF  's other roles in DNA repair and recombination, is independent of recOR . A new role for priA in UV-inducible SOS expression in a recF mutant is also defined.     

Nucleotide sequence and LexA regulation of the Escherichia coli recN gene.

The nucleotide sequence of a 2224 bp region of the Escherichia coli chromosome that carries the LexA regulated recN gene has been determined. A region of 1701 nucleotides encoding a polypeptide of 567 amino acids with a predicted molecular weight of 63,599 was identified as the most probable sequence for the recN structural gene. The proposed initiation codon is preceded by a reasonable Shine-Dalgarno sequence and a promoter region containing two 16 bp sequences, separated by 6 bp, that match the consensus sequence (SOS box) for binding LexA protein. DNA fragments containing this putative promoter region are shown to bind LexA in vitro and to have LexA-regulated promoter activity in vivo. The amino acid sequence of RecN predicted from the DNA contains a region that is homologous to highly conserved sequences found in several DNA repair enzymes and other proteins that bind ATP. A sequence of 9 amino acids was found to be homologous to a region of the RecA protein of E. coli postulated to have a role in DNA/nucleotide binding.     

Plant homologue of human excision repair gene ERCC1 points to conservation of DNA repair mechanisms

Nucleotide excision repair (NER), a highly versatile DNA repair mechanism, is capable of removing various types of DNA damage including those induced by UV radiation and chemical mutagens. NER has been well characterized in yeast and mammalian systems but its presence in plants has not been reported. Here it is reported that a plant gene isolated from male germline cells of lily (Lilium longiflorum) shows a striking amino acid sequence similarity to the DNA excision repair proteins human ERCC1 and yeast RAD10. Homologous genes are also shown to be present in a number of taxonomically diverse plant genera tested, suggesting that this gene may have a conserved function in plants. The protein encoded by this gene is able to correct significantly the sensitivity to the cross-linking agent mitomycin C in ERCC1-deficient Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. These findings suggest that the NER mechanism is conserved in yeast, animals and higher plants.     

Two Lactococcus lactis genes, including lacX, cooperate to trigger an SOS response in a recA-negative background.

A 4.3-kb EcoRI fragment from a Lactococcus lactis genomic library alleviates the methyl methanesulfonate, mitomycin C, and UV sensitivities of an Escherichia coli recA mutant (M. Novel, X. F. Huang, and G. Novel, FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 72:309-314, 1990). It complements recA1 and delta recA mutations but not recA13. Three proteins (with molecular masses of 20, 35, and 23 kDa) were produced from this fragment in a T7-directed system, and three corresponding genes were detected by DNA sequencing, namely, ISS1CH;lacX, which is the distal gene of the lac operon; and a third open reading frame, named lacN, which encodes 211 amino acids. Mutations produced in either lacX or in lacN resulted in the loss of the resistance to DNA-damaging agents. Thus, these two genes appeared to be involved in this activity. Introduction of pUCB214 carrying the 4.3-kb fragment into a lexA+ delta recA306 sfiA::lacZ strain resulted in UV-inducible synthesis of beta-galactosidase. A uvrA strain or a lexA (Ind-) strain containing pUCB214 did not support any DNA repair. However, a lexA (Def-) strain carrying pUCB214 could partly repair UV damage. We discuss possible targets for LacX and LacN products, and we speculate that LacX and LacN may constitute a two-component regulatory system that is able to respond to SOS signals, and then to act in the SOS response, bypassing the RecA-activated function.     

Roles of E. coli double-strand-break-repair proteins in stress-induced mutation

Special mechanisms of mutation are induced during growth-limiting stress and can generate adaptive mutations that permit growth. These mechanisms may provide improved models for mutagenesis in antibiotic resistance, evolution of pathogens, cancer progression and chemotherapy resistance. Stress-induced reversion of an Escherichia coli episomal lac frameshift allele specifically requires DNA double-strand-break-repair (DSBR) proteins, the SOS DNA-damage response and its error-prone DNA polymerase, DinB. We distinguished two possible roles for the DSBR proteins. Each might act solely upstream of SOS, to create single-strand DNA that induces SOS. This could upregulate DinB and enhance mutation globally. Or any or all of them might function other than or in addition to SOS promotion, for example, directly in error-prone DSBR. We report that in cells with SOS genes derepressed constitutively, RecA, RuvA, RuvB, RuvC, RecF, and TraI remain required for stress-induced mutation, demonstrating that these proteins act other than via SOS induction. RecA and TraI also act by promoting SOS. These and additional results with hyper-mutating recD and recG mutants support roles for these proteins via error-prone DSBR. Such mechanisms could localize stress-induced mutagenesis to small genomic regions, a potentially important strategy for adaptive evolution, both for reducing additional deleterious mutations in rare adaptive mutants and for concerted evolution of genes.     

Action of plasmid ColIb-P9 on the survival after ultraviolet irradiation and on the mutagenesis of the imiC, uvm, recL, uvrE and tif1 sfiA lexA spr mutants of Escherichia coli K-12 cells

To clarify the mechanisms whereby the ColIb-P9 plasmid affects DNA repair processes, its effect was studied in mutant Escherichia coli K-12 cells with altered mutagenesis and DNA repair. The plasmid was shown to protect umuC, uvm, recL and uvrE mutants after UV irradiation. The frequency of UV-induced his+ revertants increased in the presence of the plasmid in umuC, uvm and recL mutant cells. The ColIb-P9 plasmid completely restored the UV mutability and survival of umuC mutants. These results suggest that the ColIb-P9 plasmid may encode a product similar to that of the umuC gene. In the tif1 sfiA lexA spr mutant cells where SOS functions are constitutively expressed, the ColIb-P9 plasmid increased the number of his+ revertants several times. This suggests that the action of ColIb-P9 is probably brought about not via the derepression of the recA gene but at the subsequent stages of the recA+lexA+-dependent DNA error-prone repair.     

Vertebrate immunity: mutator proteins and their evolution

M.E. Lobashev has brilliantly postulated in 1947 that error-prone repair contribute to mutations in cells. This was shown to be true once the mechanisms of UV mutagenesis in Escherichia coli were deciphered. Induced mutations are generated during error-prone SOS DNA repair with the involvement of inaccurate DNA polymerases belonging to the Y family. Currently, several distinct mutator enzymes participating in spontaneous and induced mutagenesis have been identified. Upon induction of these proteins, mutation rates increase by several orders of magnitude. These proteins regulate the mutation rates in evolution and in ontogeny during immune response. In jawed vertebrates, somatic hypermutagenesis occurs in the variable regions of immunoglobulin genes, leading to affinity maturation of antibodies. The process is initiated by cytidine deamination in DNA to uracil by AID (Activation-Induced Deaminase). Further repair of uracil-containing DNA through proteins that include the Y family DNA polymerases causes mutations, induce gene conversion, and class switch recombination. In jawless vertebrates, the variable lymphocyte receptors (VLR) serve as the primary molecules for adaptive immunity. Generation of mature VLRs most likely depends on agnathan AID-like deaminases. AID and its orthologs in lamprey (PmCDA1 and PMCDA2) belong to the AID/APOBEC family of RNA/DNA editing cytidine deaminases. This family includes enzymes with different functions: APOBEC1 edits RNA, APOBEC3 restricts retroviruses. The functions of APOBEC2 and APOBEC4 have not been yet determined. Here, we report a new member of the AID/APOBEC family, APOBEC5, in the bacterium Xanthomonas oryzae. The widespread presence of RNA/DNA editing deaminases suggests that they are an ancient means of generating genetic diversity.     

Repair promoted by plasmid pKM101 is different from SOS repair.

In E. coli K12 bacteria carrying plasmid pKM101, prophage lambda was induced at UV doses higher than in plasmid-less parental bacteria. UV-induced reactivation per se was less effective. Bacteria with pKM101 showed no alteration in their division cycle. Plasmid pKM101 coded for a constitutive error-prone repair different from the inducible error-prone repair called SOS repair. Plasmid pKM101 protected E. coli bacteria from UV damage but slightly sensitized them to X-ray lesions. Protection against UV damage was effective in mutant bacteria deficient in DNA excision-repair provided that the recA, lexA and uvrE genes were functional. Survival of phages lambda and S13 after UV irradiation was enhanced in bacteria carrying plasmid pKM101; phage lambda mutagenesis was also increased. Plasmid pKM101 repaired potentially lethal DNA lesions, although wild-type DNA sequences may not necessarily be restored; hence the mutations observed are the traces of the original DNA lesions.