A Multi-label Classifier for Prediction Membrane Protein Functional Types in Animal

Membrane protein is an important composition of cell membrane. Given a membrane protein sequence, how can we identify its type(s) is very important because the type keeps a close correlation with its functions. According to previous studies, membrane protein can be divided into the following eight types: single-pass type I, single-pass type II, single-pass type III, single-pass type IV, multipass, lipid-anchor, GPI-anchor, peripheral membrane protein. With the avalanche of newly found protein sequences in the post-genomic age, it is urgent to develop an automatic and effective computational method to rapid and reliable prediction of the types of membrane proteins. At present, most of the existing methods were based on the assumption that one membrane protein only belongs to one type. Actually, a membrane protein may simultaneously exist at two or more different functional types. In this study, a new method by hybridizing the pseudo amino acid composition with multi-label algorithm called LIFT (multi-label learning with label-specific features) was proposed to predict the functional types both singleplex and multiplex animal membrane proteins. Experimental result on a stringent benchmark dataset of membrane proteins by jackknife test show that the absolute-true obtained was 0.6342, indicating that our approach is quite promising. It may become a useful high-through tool, or at least play a complementary role to the existing predictors in identifying functional types of membrane proteins.     

Predicting membrane protein types using residue-pair models based on reduced similarity dataset

An algorithm to predict the membrane protein types based on the multi-residue-pair effect in the Markov model is proposed. For a newly constructed dataset of 835 membrane proteins with very low sequence similarity, the overall prediction accuracy has been achieved as high as 81.1% and 71.7% in the resubstitution and jackknife test, respectively, for a prediction of type I single-pass, type II single-pass, multi-pass membrane proteins, lipid chain-anchored and GPI-anchored membrane proteins. The improvement of about 11% in the jackknife test can be achieved compared with the component-coupled algorithm merely based on the amino acid composition (AAC approach). The improvement is also confirmed on a high similarity dataset and the other extrapolating test. The result implies that designing more incisive analysis tools, one should develop algorithms based on the representative dataset with lower sequence similarity. The present algorithm is useful to expedite the determination of the types and functions of new membrane proteins and may be useful for the systematic analysis of functional genome data in a large scale. The computer program is available on request.     

Simultaneous prediction of protein secondary structure and transmembrane spans

Prediction of transmembrane spans and secondary structure from the protein sequence is generally the first step in the structural characterization of (membrane) proteins. Preference of a stretch of amino acids in a protein to form secondary structure and being placed in the membrane are correlated. Nevertheless, current methods predict either secondary structure or individual transmembrane states. We introduce a method that simultaneously predicts the secondary structure and transmembrane spans from the protein sequence. This approach not only eliminates the necessity to create a consensus prediction from possibly contradicting outputs of several predictors but bears the potential to predict conformational switches, i.e., sequence regions that have a high probability to change for example from a coil conformation in solution to an α‐helical transmembrane state. An artificial neural network was trained on databases of 177 membrane proteins and 6048 soluble proteins. The output is a 3 × 3 dimensional probability matrix for each residue in the sequence that combines three secondary structure types (helix, strand, coil) and three environment types (membrane core, interface, solution). The prediction accuracies are 70.3% for nine possible states, 73.2% for three‐state secondary structure prediction, and 94.8% for three‐state transmembrane span prediction. These accuracies are comparable to state‐of‐the‐art predictors of secondary structure (e.g., Psipred) or transmembrane placement (e.g., OCTOPUS). The method is available as web server and for download at www.meilerlab.org . Proteins 2013; 81:1127–1140. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Influence of amino acid properties for discriminating outer membrane proteins at better accuracy

Discriminating outer membrane proteins (OMPs) from other folding types of globular and membrane proteins is an important task both for identifying outer membrane proteins from genomic sequences and for the successful prediction of their secondary and tertiary structures. In this work, we have analyzed the influence of physico-chemical, energetic and conformational properties of amino acid residues for discriminating outer membrane proteins using different machine learning algorithms, such as, Bayes rules, Logistic functions, Neural networks, Support vector machines, Decision trees, etc. We observed that most of the properties have discriminated the OMPs with similar accuracy. The neural network method with the property, free energy change could discriminate the OMPs from other folding types of globular and membrane proteins at the 5-fold cross-validation accuracy of 94.4% in a dataset of 1,088 proteins, which is better than that obtained with amino acid composition. The accuracy of discriminating globular proteins is 94.3% and that of transmembrane helical (TMH) proteins is 91.8%. Further, the neural network method is tested with globular proteins belonging to 30 major folding types and it could successfully exclude 99.4% of the considered 1612 non-redundant proteins. These accuracy levels are comparable to or better than other methods in the literature. We suggest that this method could be effectively used to discriminate OMPs and for detecting OMPs in genomic sequences.     

α-螺旋跨膜蛋白拓扑结构预测方法的评价

在基因组数据中,有20%～30%的产物被预测为跨膜蛋白,本文通过对膜蛋白拓扑结构预测方法进行分析,并评价其结果,为选择更合适的拓扑结构预测方法预测膜蛋白结构。通过对目前已有的拓扑结构预测方法的评价分析,可以为我们在实际工作中提供重要的参考。比如对一个未知拓扑结构的跨膜蛋白序列,我们可以先进行是否含有信号肽的预测,参考Polyphobius和SignalP两种方法,若两种方法预测结果不一致,综合上述对两种方法的评价,Polyphobius预测的综合能力较好,可取其预测的结果,一旦确定含有信号肽,则N端必然位于膜外侧。然后结合序列的长度,判断蛋白是单跨膜还是多重跨膜,即可参照上述评价结果,选择合适的拓扑结构预测方法进行预测。     

Proportion of membrane proteins in proteomes of 15 single-cell organisms analyzed by the SOSUI prediction system

A software system, SOSUI, was previously developed for discriminating between soluble and membrane proteins and predicting transmembrane regions (Hirokawa et al., Bioinformatics, 14 (1998) 378-379). The performance of the system was 99% for the discrimination between two types of proteins and 96% for the prediction of transmembrane helices. When all of the amino acid sequences from 15 single-cell organisms were analyzed by SOSUI, the proportion of predicted polytopic membrane proteins showed an almost constant value of 15-20%, irrespective of the total genome size. However, single-cell organisms appeared to be categorized in terms of the preference of the number of transmembrane segments: species with small genomes were characterized by a significant peak at a helix number of approximately six or seven; species with large genomes showed a peak at 10 or 11 helices; and species with intermediate genome sizes showed a monotonous decrease of the population of membrane proteins against the number of transmembrane helices.     

Comprehensive analysis of the numbers,lengths and amino acid compositions of transmembrane helices in prokaryotic,eukaryotic and viral integral membrane proteins of high-resolution structure

We report a comprehensive analysis of the numbers, lengths and amino acid compositions of transmembrane helices in 235 high-resolution structures of integral membrane proteins. The properties of 1551 transmembrane helices in the structures were compared with those obtained by analysis of the same amino acid sequences using topology prediction tools. Explanations for the 81 (5.2%) missing or additional transmembrane helices in the prediction results were identified. Main reasons for missing transmembrane helices were mis-identification of N-terminal signal peptides, breaks in α-helix conformation or charged residues in the middle of transmembrane helices and transmembrane helices with unusual amino acid composition. The main reason for additional transmembrane helices was mis-identification of amphipathic helices, extramembrane helices or hairpin re-entrant loops. Transmembrane helix length had an overall median of 24 residues and an average of 24.9 ± 7.0 residues and the most common length was 23 residues. The overall content of residues in transmembrane helices as a percentage of the full proteins had a median of 56.8% and an average of 55.7 ± 16.0%. Amino acid composition was analysed for the full proteins, transmembrane helices and extramembrane regions. Individual proteins or types of proteins with transmembrane helices containing extremes in contents of individual amino acids or combinations of amino acids with similar physicochemical properties were identified and linked to structure and/or function. In addition to overall median and average values, all results were analysed for proteins originating from different types of organism (prokaryotic, eukaryotic, viral) and for subgroups of receptors, channels, transporters and others.     

Protein subcellular location prediction

The function of a protein is closely correlated with its subcellular location. With the rapid increase in new protein sequences entering into data banks, we are confronted with a challenge: is it possible to utilize a bioinformatic approach to help expedite the determination of protein subcellular locations? To explore this problem, proteins were classified, according to their subcellular locations, into the following 12 groups: (1) chloroplast, (2) cytoplasm, (3) cytoskeleton, (4) endoplasmic reticulum, (5) extracell, (6) Golgi apparatus, (7) lysosome, (8) mitochondria, (9) nucleus, (10) peroxisome, (11) plasma membrane and (12) vacuole. Based on the classification scheme that has covered almost all the organelles and subcellular compartments in an animal or plant cell, a covariant discriminant algorithm was proposed to predict the subcellular location of a query protein according to its amino acid composition. Results obtained through self-consistency, jackknife and independent dataset tests indicated that the rates of correct prediction by the current algorithm are significantly higher than those by the existing methods. It is anticipated that the classification scheme and concept and also the prediction algorithm can expedite the functionality determination of new proteins, which can also be of use in the prioritization of genes and proteins identified by genomic efforts as potential molecular targets for drug design.     

Transmembrane helices predicted at 95% accuracy.

We describe a neural network system that predicts the locations of transmembrane helices in integral membrane proteins. By using evolutionary information as input to the network system, the method significantly improved on a previously published neural network prediction method that had been based on single sequence information. The input data were derived from multiple alignments for each position in a window of 13 adjacent residues: amino acid frequency, conservation weights, number of insertions and deletions, and position of the window with respect to the ends of the protein chain. Additional input was the amino acid composition and length of the whole protein. A rigorous cross-validation test on 69 proteins with experimentally determined locations of transmembrane segments yielded an overall two-state per-residue accuracy of 95%. About 94% of all segments were predicted correctly. When applied to known globular proteins as a negative control, the network system incorrectly predicted fewer than 5% of globular proteins as having transmembrane helices. The method was applied to all 269 open reading frames from the complete yeast VIII chromosome. For 59 of these, at least two transmembrane helices were predicted. Thus, the prediction is that about one-fourth of all proteins from yeast VIII contain one transmembrane helix, and some 20%, more than one.     

Using Fourier Spectrum Analysis and Pseudo Amino Acid Composition for Prediction of Membrane Protein Types

Membrane proteins are generally classified into the following five types: (1) type I membrane protein, (2) type II membrane protein, (3) multipass transmembrane proteins, (4) lipid chain-anchored membrane proteins, and (5) GPI-anchored membrane proteins. Given the sequence of an uncharacterized membrane protein, how can we identify which one of the above five types it belongs to? This is important because the biological function of a membrane protein is closely correlated with its type. Particularly, with the explosion of protein sequences entering into databanks, it is in high demand to develop an automated method to address this problem. To realize this, the key is to catch the statistical characteristics for each of the five types. However, it is not easy because they are buried in a pile of long and complicated sequences. In this paper, based on the concept of the pseudo amino acid composition (Chou, K. C. (2001). PROTEINS: Structure, Function, and Genetics 43: 246–255), the technique of Fourier spectrum analysis is introduced. By doing so, the sample of a protein is represented by a set of discrete components that can incorporate a considerable amount of the sequence order effects as well as its amino acid composition information. On the basis of such a statistical frame, the support vector machine (SVM) is introduced to perform predictions. High success rates were yielded by the self-consistency test, jackknife test, and independent dataset test, suggesting that the current approach holds a promising potential to become a high throughput tool for membrane protein type prediction as well as other related areas.     

Prediction of membrane protein types from sequences and position-specific scoring matrices

Membrane protein plays an important role in some biochemical process such as signal transduction, transmembrane transport, etc. Membrane proteins are usually classified into five types [Chou, K.C., Elrod, D.W., 1999. Prediction of membrane protein types and subcellular locations. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 34, 137-153] or six types [Chou, K.C., Cai, Y.D., 2005. J. Chem. Inf. Modelling 45, 407-413]. Designing in silico methods to identify and classify membrane protein can help us understand the structure and function of unknown proteins. This paper introduces an integrative approach, IAMPC, to classify membrane proteins based on protein sequences and protein profiles. These modules extract the amino acid composition of the whole profiles, the amino acid composition of N-terminal and C-terminal profiles, the amino acid composition of profile segments and the dipeptide composition of the whole profiles. In the computational experiment, the overall accuracy of the proposed approach is comparable with the functional-domain-based method. In addition, the performance of the proposed approach is complementary to the functional-domain-based method for different membrane protein types.     

Artificial neural network model for predicting membrane protein types

Membrane proteins can be classified among the following five types: (1) type I membrane protein. (2) type II membrane protein. (3) multipass transmembrane proteins. (4) lipid chain-anchored membrane proteins, and (5) GPI-anchored membrane proteins. T. Kohonen's self-organization model which is a typical neural network is applied for predicting the type of a given membrane protein based on its amino acid composition. As a result, the high rates of self-consistency (94.80%) and cross-validation (77.76%), and stronger fault-tolerant ability were obtained.     

Cellular levels of heme affect the activity of dimeric glutamyl-tRNA reductase

Prestin, a multipass transmembrane protein whose N- and C-termini are localized to the cytoplasm, must be trafficked to the plasma membrane to fulfill its cellular function as a molecular motor. One challenge in studying prestin sequence-function relationships within living cells is separating the effects of amino acid substitutions on prestin trafficking, plasma membrane localization and function. To develop an approach for directly assessing prestin levels at the plasma membrane, we have investigated whether fusion of prestin to a single pass transmembrane protein results in a functional fusion protein with a surface-exposed N-terminal tag that can be detected in living cells. We find that fusion of the biotin-acceptor peptide (BAP) and transmembrane domain of the platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) to the N-terminus of prestin-GFP yields a membrane protein that can be metabolically-labeled with biotin, trafficked to the plasma membrane, and selectively detected at the plasma membrane using fluorescently-tagged streptavidin. Furthermore, we show that the addition of a surface detectable tag and a single-pass transmembrane domain to prestin does not disrupt its voltage-sensitive activity.     

使用多特征联合变量的支持向量机方法预测外膜蛋白

外膜蛋白(Outer Membrane Proteins, OMPs)是一类具有重要生物功能的蛋白质, 通过生物信息学方法来预测OMPs能够为预测OMPs的二级和三级结构以及在基因组发现新的OMPs提供帮助。文中提出计算蛋白质序列的氨基酸含量特征、二肽含量特征和加权多阶氨基酸残基指数相关系数特征, 将三类特征组合, 采用支持向量机(Support Vector Machine, SVM)算法来识别OMPs。计算了包括四种残基指数的多种组合特征的识别结果, 并且讨论了相关系数的阶次和权值对预测性能的影响。在数据集上的十倍交叉验证测试和独立性测试结果显示, 组合特征识别方法对OMPs和非OMPs的识别精度最高分别达到96.96%和97.33%, 优于现有的多种方法。在五种细菌基因组内识别OMPs的结果显示, 组合特征方法具有很高的特异性, 并且对PDB数据库中已知结构的OMPs识别准确度超过99%。表明该方法能够作为基因组内筛选OMPs的有效工具。     

使用多特征联合变量的支持向量机方法预测外膜蛋白

外膜蛋白(Outer Membrane Proteins, OMPs)是一类具有重要生物功能的蛋白质, 通过生物信息学方法来预测OMPs能够为预测OMPs的二级和三级结构以及在基因组发现新的OMPs提供帮助。文中提出计算蛋白质序列的氨基酸含量特征、二肽含量特征和加权多阶氨基酸残基指数相关系数特征, 将三类特征组合, 采用支持向量机(Support Vector Machine, SVM)算法来识别OMPs。计算了包括四种残基指数的多种组合特征的识别结果, 并且讨论了相关系数的阶次和权值对预测性能的影响。在数据集上的十倍交叉验证测试和独立性测试结果显示, 组合特征识别方法对OMPs和非OMPs的识别精度最高分别达到96.96%和97.33%, 优于现有的多种方法。在五种细菌基因组内识别OMPs的结果显示, 组合特征方法具有很高的特异性, 并且对PDB数据库中已知结构的OMPs识别准确度超过99%。表明该方法能够作为基因组内筛选OMPs的有效工具。     

On the Importance of Amino Acid Sequence and Spatial Proximity of Interacting Residues for Protein Folding

Abstract

Membrane proteins can be classified among the following five types: (1) type I membrane protein. (2) type II membrane protein. (3) multipass transmembrane proteins. (4) lipid chain- anchored membrane proteins, and (5) GPI-anchored membrane proteins. T. Kohonen's self-organization model which is a typical neural network is applied for predicting the type of a given membrane protein based on its amino acid composition. As a result, the high rates of self-consistency (94.80%) and cross-validation (77.76%), and stronger fault-tolerant ability were obtained.     

Predicting membrane protein types by fusing composite protein sequence features into pseudo amino acid composition

Membrane proteins are vital type of proteins that serve as channels, receptors, and energy transducers in a cell. Prediction of membrane protein types is an important research area in bioinformatics. Knowledge of membrane protein types provides some valuable information for predicting novel example of the membrane protein types. However, classification of membrane protein types can be both time consuming and susceptible to errors due to the inherent similarity of membrane protein types. In this paper, neural networks based membrane protein type prediction system is proposed. Composite protein sequence representation (CPSR) is used to extract the features of a protein sequence, which includes seven feature sets; amino acid composition, sequence length, 2 gram exchange group frequency, hydrophobic group, electronic group, sum of hydrophobicity, and R-group. Principal component analysis is then employed to reduce the dimensionality of the feature vector. The probabilistic neural network (PNN), generalized regression neural network, and support vector machine (SVM) are used as classifiers. A high success rate of 86.01% is obtained using SVM for the jackknife test. In case of independent dataset test, PNN yields the highest accuracy of 95.73%. These classifiers exhibit improved performance using other performance measures such as sensitivity, specificity, Mathew's correlation coefficient, and F-measure. The experimental results show that the prediction performance of the proposed scheme for classifying membrane protein types is the best reported, so far. This performance improvement may largely be credited to the learning capabilities of neural networks and the composite feature extraction strategy, which exploits seven different properties of protein sequences. The proposed Mem-Predictor can be accessed at http://111.68.99.218/Mem-Predictor.     

Statistical approach for lysosomal membrane proteins (LMPs) identification

Discrimination of Lysosomal membrane proteins (LMP’s) from folding types of globular (GPs) and other membrane proteins (OtMPs) is an important task both for identifying LMPs from genomic sequences and for the successful prediction of their secondary and tertiary structures. We have systematically analyzed the amino acid frequencies as well as dipeptide count of GPs, LMPs and OtMPs. Based on the above calculated single amino acid frequency combined with dipeptide count information, we statistically discriminated LMPs from GPs and OtMPs. This approach correctly classified the LMPs with an accuracy of 95 %. On the other hand, the amino acid frequency alone can discriminate LMPs with an accuracy of only 79 %. Similarly dipeptide count alone has an accuracy of 87 % for the discrimination of LMPs. Thus the combined information of both amino acid frequencies and dipeptide composition gives us significant high accurate results.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11693-014-9153-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.