Histone macroH2A1.2 is concentrated in the XY-body by the early pachytene stage of spermatogenesis

The pairing of sex chromosomes during meiosis in male mammals is associated with ongoing heterochromatinization and X inactivation. This process occurs in a specific area of the nucleus that can be discerned morphologically: the sex vesicle or XY-body. In contrast to X inactivation in the somatic cells of female mammals the reasons for X inactivation in the male germline remain obscure. We have recently demonstrated that the inactive X chromosome in somatic cells of female mammals is marked by a high concentration of histone macroH2A. Here we investigate X inactivation in the meiotic cells of the male germline. We demonstrate here that macroH2A1.2 is present in the nuclei of germ cells starting first with localization that is largely, if not exclusively, to the developing XY-body in early pachytene spermatocytes. Our results suggest that inactivation of sex chromosomes in the male germ cell includes a major alteration of the nucleosomal structure.     

Pericentric inversion of the X chromosome: presentation of a case and review of the literature.

A large pericentric inversion of the X chromosome [inv(X)(p22.31q26.3)] was found to be transmitted in four generations through phenotypically normal males and females. In one female carrier, the inv(X) was late replicating in 70% of lymphocytes and 46% of skin fibroblasts. Steroid sulfatase (STS), an enzyme which normally escapes inactivation has been located to Xp22.32 and, in our case, has been moved to an aberrant position. We have assayed its activity in clones with the inv(X) inactive or the normal X inactive and found no significant differences. Thus, the STS locus escaped X inactivation in both the normal and the inverted X chromosomes. A review of the literature shows that almost half of the breakpoints on the short arm are found at region p22 and we propose that low-copy repetitive DNA segments along the X chromosome are responsible for non-homologous pairing and production of inversions.     

Insights into the meiotic behavior and evolution of multiple sex chromosome systems in spiders

A characteristic feature of spider karyotypes is the predominance of unusual multiple X chromosomes. To elucidate the evolution of spider sex chromosomes, their meiotic behavior was analyzed in 2 major clades of opisthothele spiders, namely, the entelegyne araneomorphs and the mygalomorphs. Our data support the predominance of X(1)X(2)0 systems in entelegynes, while rare X(1)X(2)X(3)X(4)0 systems were revealed in the tuberculote mygalomorphs. The spider species studied exhibited a considerable diversity of achiasmate sex chromosome pairing in male meiosis. The end-to-end pairing of sex chromosomes found in mygalomorphs was gradually replaced by the parallel attachment of sex chromosomes in entelegynes. The observed association of male X univalents with a centrosome at the first meiotic division may ensure the univalents' segregation. Spider meiotic sex chromosomes also showed other unique traits, namely, association with a chromosome pair in males and inactivation in females. Analysis of these traits supports the hypothesis that the multiple X chromosomes of spiders originated by duplications. In contrast to the homogametic sex of other animals, the homologous sex chromosomes of spider females were already paired at premeiotic interphase and were inactivated until prophase I. Furthermore, the sex chromosome pairs exhibited an end-to-end association during these stages. We suggest that the specific behavior of the female sex chromosomes may have evolved to avoid the negative effects of duplicated X chromosomes on female meiosis. The chromosome ends that ensure the association of sex chromosome pairs during meiosis may contain information for discriminating between homologous and homeologous X chromosomes and thus act to promote homologous pairing. The meiotic behavior of 4 X chromosome pairs in mygalomorph females, namely, the formation of 2 associations, each composed of 2 pairs with similar structure, suggests that the mygalomorph X(1)X(2)X(3)X(4)0 system originated by the duplication of the X(1)X(2)0 system via nondisjunctions or polyploidization.     

THE EVOLUTION OF HETEROMORPHIC SEX CHROMOSOMES

The facts and ideas which have been discussed lead to the following synthesis and model. 1. Heteromorphic sex chromosomes evolved from a pair of homomorphic chromosomes which had an allelic difference at the sex-determining locus. 2. The first step in the evolution of sex-chromosome heteromorphism involved either a conformational or a structural difference between the homologues. A structural difference could have arisen through a rearrangement such as an inversion or a translocation. A conformational difference could have occurred if the sex-determining locus was located in a chromosomal domain which behaved as a single control unit and involved a substantial segment of the chromosome. It is assumed that any conformational difference present in somatic cells would have been maintained in meiotic prophase. 3. Lack of conformational or structural homology between the sex chromosomes led to meiotic pairing failure. Since pairing failure reduced fertility, mechanisms preventing it had a selective advantage. Meiotic inactivation (heterochromatinization) of the differential region of the X chromosome in species with heterogametic males and euchromatinization of the W in species with heterogametic females are such mechanisms, and through them the pairing problems are avoided. 4. Structural and conformational differences between the sex chromosomes in the heterogametic sex reduced recombination. In heterogametic males recombination was reduced still further by the heterochromatinization of the X chromosome, which evolved in response to selection against meiotic pairing failure. 5. Suppression of recombination resulted in an increase in the mutation rate and an increased rate of fixation of deleterious mutations in the recombination-free chromosome regions. Functional degeneration of the genetically isolated regions of the Y and W was the result. In XY males this often led to further meiotic inactivation of the differential region of the X chromosome, and in this way an evolutionary positive-feedback loop may have been established. 6. Structural degeneration (loss of material) followed functional degeneration of Y or W chromosomes either because the functionally degenerate genes had deleterious effects which made their loss a selective advantage, or because shorter chromosomes were selectively neutral and became fixed by chance. 7. The evolutionary routes to sex-chromosome heteromorphism in groups with female heterogamety are more limited than in those with male heterogamety. Oocytes are usually large and long-lived, and are likely to need the products of X- or Z-linked genes. Meiotic inactivation of these chromosomes is therefore unlikely. In the oocytes of ZW females, meiotic pairing failure is avoided through euchromatinization of the W rather than heterochromatinization of the Z chromosome.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Lack of evidence that the XqYq pairing tips at meiosis in the mouse show hypersensitivity to DNAse I

In situ nick translation procedures have been applied to meiotic metaphase I divisions of the normal and XY, Sxr mouse. Unlike in man, where the pairing tips of the XY bivalent show a special sensitivity to DNAse I nicking, no such sensitivity can be detected for either of these types of mouse. Hypersensitivity in the D-band equivalent region of the X chromosome does, however, exist, this site being early replicating in somatic cells and housing the X inactivation centre (Xce).     

哺乳动物X染色体失活机制

哺乳动物X染色体连锁基因的剂量平衡,是通过雌性胚胎发育早期随机或印记失活一条X染色体来实现的,这是一个复杂的过程,包括：启动、计数、选择、维持等一系列的步骤。X染色体失活中心是X染色体失活的主控开关座位,调节X失活的早期事件,失活发生后,X染色体的失活状态可稳定地存在并传递给后代,这一过程涉及基因组印记的形成。此外,在雄性动物,精原细胞减数分裂早期也存在着短暂的X染色体失活现象。现对哺乳动物X染色体失活机制的最新进展进行综述。     

Identification of a Ctcf cofactor, Yy1, for the X chromosome binary switch

In mammals, inactivation of one X chromosome in the female equalizes gene dosages between XX females and XY males. Two noncoding loci, Tsix and Xite, together regulate X chromosome fate by controlling homologous chromosome pairing, counting, and mutually exclusive choice. Following choice, the asymmetry of Xite and Tsix expression drives divergent chromosome fates, but how this pattern becomes established is currently unknown. Although no proven trans-acting factors have been identified, a likely candidate is Ctcf, a chromatin insulator with essential function in autosomal imprinting. Here, we search for trans-factors and identify Yy1 as a required cofactor for Ctcf. Paired Ctcf-Yy1 elements are highly clustered within the counting/choice and imprinting domain of Tsix. A deficiency of Yy1 leads to aberrant Tsix and Xist expression, resulting in a deficit of male and female embryos. Yy1 and Ctcf associate through specific protein-protein interactions and together transactivate Tsix. We propose that the Ctcf-Yy1-Tsix complex functions as a key component of the X chromosome binary switch.     

Colocalization of Multiple DNA Loci: A Physical Mechanism

A variety of important cellular processes require, for functional purposes, the colocalization of multiple DNA loci at specific time points. In most cases, the physical mechanisms responsible for bringing them in close proximity are still elusive. Here we show that the interaction of DNA loci with a concentration of diffusing molecular factors can induce spontaneously their colocalization, through a mechanism based on a thermodynamic phase transition. We consider up to four DNA loci and different valencies for diffusing molecular factors. In particular, our analysis illustrates that a variety of nontrivial stable spatial configurations is allowed in the system, depending on the details of the molecular factor/DNA binding-sites interaction. Finally, we discuss as a case study an application of our model to the pairing of X chromosome at X inactivation, one of the best-known examples of DNA colocalization. We also speculate on the possible links between X colocalization and inactivation.     

The effect of heterochromatin on synapsis of the sex chromosomes of Peromyscus (Rodentia, Cricetidae)

The pairing behavior of the sex chromosomes in male and female individuals representing seven species of Peromyscus was analyzed by electron microscopy of silver-stained zygotene and pachytene configurations. Six species possess submetacentric or metacentric X chromosomes with heterochromatic short arms. Sex-chromosome pairing in these species is initiated during early pachynema at an interstitial position on the X and Y axes. Homologous synapsis then progresses in a unidirectional fashion towards the telomeres of the X short arm and the corresponding arm of the heterochromatic Y chromosome. The distinctive pattern of synaptic initiation allowed a late-synapsing bivalent in fetal oocytes to be tentatively identified as that of the X chromosomes. In contrast to the other species, Peromyscus megalops possesses an acrocentric X chromosome and a very small Y chromosome. Sex-chromosome pairing in this species is initiated at the proximal telomeric region during late zygonema, and then proceeds interstitially towards the distal end of the Y chromosome. These observations suggest that the presence of X short-arm heterochromatin and corresponding Y heterochromatin interferes with late-zygotene alignment of the pairing initiation sites, thereby delaying XY synaptic initiation until early pachynema. The pairing initiation sites are conserved in the vicinity of the X and Y centromeres in Peromyscus, and consequently the addition of heterochromatin during sex-chromosome evolution essentially displaces these sites to an interstitial position.     

HIM-8 binds to the X chromosome pairing center and mediates chromosome-specific meiotic synapsis

The him-8 gene is essential for proper meiotic segregation of the X chromosomes in C. elegans. Here we show that loss of him-8 function causes profound X chromosome-specific defects in homolog pairing and synapsis. him-8 encodes a C2H2 zinc-finger protein that is expressed during meiosis and concentrates at a site on the X chromosome known as the meiotic pairing center (PC). A role for HIM-8 in PC function is supported by genetic interactions between PC lesions and him-8 mutations. HIM-8 bound chromosome sites associate with the nuclear envelope (NE) throughout meiotic prophase. Surprisingly, a point mutation in him-8 that retains both chromosome binding and NE localization fails to stabilize pairing or promote synapsis. These observations indicate that stabilization of homolog pairing is an active process in which the tethering of chromosome sites to the NE may be necessary but is not sufficient.     

X chromosome choice occurs independently of asynchronous replication timing

In mammals, dosage compensation is achieved by X chromosome inactivation in female cells. Xist is required and sufficient for X inactivation, and Xist gene deletions result in completely skewed X inactivation. In this work, we analyzed skewing of X inactivation in mice with an Xist deletion encompassing sequence 5 KB upstream of the promoter through exon 3. We found that this mutation results in primary nonrandom X inactivation in which the wild-type X chromosome is always chosen for inactivation. To understand the molecular mechanisms that affect choice, we analyzed the role of replication timing in X inactivation choice. We found that the two Xist alleles and all regions tested on the X chromosome replicate asynchronously before the start of X inactivation. However, analysis of replication timing in cell lines with skewed X inactivation showed no preference for one of the two Xist alleles to replicate early in S-phase before the onset of X inactivation, indicating that asynchronous replication timing does not play a role in skewing of X inactivation.     

Sexual antagonism and X inactivation--the SAXI hypothesis

X inactivation has evolved in the soma of mammalian females so that both sexes have the same ratio of X:autosomal gene expression. The X chromosome in the germ cells of XY males is also precociously inactivated for reasons that remain unclear. Unlike X inactivation in the soma, this germline X inactivation is not restricted to mammals but has evolved independently in several animal phyla. Thus, germline X inactivation might have been the precursor of somatic X inactivation in mammals. We now propose a hypothesis for the evolution of germline X inactivation. The hypothesis predicts a redistribution of late spermatogenic genes from the X chromosome to the autosomes, leading eventually to germline X inactivation as the X chromosome becomes 'demasculinized'. Sexual antagonism could be the mechanism driving this redistribution. Recent expression and genetic studies in mammals, nematodes and Drosophila support this hypothesis, and expression data on taxa that have not evolved germline X inactivation, such as birds and butterflies, should shed further light on it.     

Sex-chromosome pairing: evidence that the behavior of the pseudoautosomal region differs during male and female meiosis.

In humans, recombination in the pseudoautosomal region is approximately 10-fold higher in males than in females. This difference is thought to reflect the fact that, in females, there is opportunity for genetic exchange along the entire length of the X chromosome, resulting in a relative reduction in the likelihood of exchange in the pseudoautosomal region. In two instances in the laboratory mouse where X-chromosome pairing and exchange in females are limited to the pseudoautosomal region, a significant level of X-chromosome pairing failure was observed at diakinesis/metaphase I. Further analysis indicated that, in female meiosis, the inability of the X chromosome to consistently form a pairing configuration via the pseudoautosomal region alone is not a property of the pseudoautosomal region per se but is due to the fact that it resides on an X chromosome. Thus previously reported sex-linked differences in recombination rate in the pseudoautosomal region may actually reflect differences in pairing and/or recombination of the pseudoautosomal region on an X chromosome undergoing male versus female meiosis.     

A fluorescent in situ hybridization analysis of X chromosome pairing in early human female meiosis

Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) utilizing an X chromosome whole library probe was used directly to assess the rate of aneuploidy and pairing behavior of the X chromosome in human female meiosis. Over 3000 meiotic cells obtained from fetal ovaries (gestational age 13–22 weeks) were scored for meiotic stage and evaluated for pairing abnormalities. No pairing anomalies were observed in 832 pachytenes. Twenty-two percent (88/398) of cells in zygotene were partially paired, but nonhomologous pairings could not be identified. One aneuploid preleptotene oocyte, presumably from mitotic nondisjunction was detected. To our knowledge, this is the first report of the use of FISH utilizing whole chromosome probes to evaluate the pairing behavior of chromosomes in human female meiosis. The application of this technique to study the relationship between nondisjunction and chromosome pairing behavior in maternal-age-related aneuploidy is discussed.     

X chromosome imprinting and inactivation in preimplantation mammalian embryos

Dosage compensation for the mammalian X chromosome involves the silencing of one X chromosome to achieve equal X-linked gene expression between males and females. X chromosome inactivation (XCI) is controlled by a complex set of genetic elements located in a region known as the X chromosome inactivation center, and is regulated by a combination of genomic imprinting, cell lineage-dependent erasure of imprinting, an unidentified mechanism of X chromosome counting, an incompletely understood means of selection of one X chromosome for inactivation and developmentally regulated changes in X chromosome chromatin. A detailed understanding of when and how these components of XCI occur is essential for elucidating the operative mechanisms. A model accounting for early events related to XCI, including observations in uniparental and aneuploid embryos, is presented.     

A Cis-Acting Locus That Promotes Crossing over between X Chromosomes in Caenorhabditis Elegans

This study reports the characterization of a cis-acting locus on the Caenorhabditis elegans X chromosome that is crucial for promoting normal levels of crossing over specifically between the X homologs and for ensuring their proper disjunction at meiosis I. The function of this locus is disrupted by the mutation me8, which maps to the extreme left end of the X chromosome within the region previously implicated by studies of X;A translocations and X duplications to contain a meiotic pairing site. Hermaphrodites homozygous for a deletion of the locus (Df/Df) or heterozygous for a deletion and the me8 mutation (me8/Df) exhibit extremely high levels of X chromosome nondisjunction at the reductional division; this is correlated with a sharp decrease in crossing over between the X homologs as evidenced both by reductions in genetic map distances and by the presence of achiasmate chromosomes in cytological preparations of oocyte nuclei. Duplications of the wild-type region that are unlinked to the X chromosome cannot complement the recombination and disjunction defects in trans, indicating that this region must be present in cis to the X chromosome to ensure normal levels of crossing over and proper homolog disjunction. me8 homozygotes exhibit an altered distribution of crossovers along the X chromosome that suggests a defect in processivity along the X chromosome of an event that initiates at the chromosome end. Models are discussed in which the cis-acting locus deleted by the Dfs functions as a meiotic pairing center that recruits trans-acting factors onto the chromosomes to nucleate assembly of a crossover-competent complex between the X homologs. This pairing center might function in the process of homolog recognition, or in the initiation of homologous synapsis.     

Assessment of X bends in patients with atypical X chromosome phenotypes.

Several patients with X chromosome structural abnormalities have been more severely affected clinically than expected. Since bends at Xq13-21 have been associated with inactivation, the authors scored bends retrospectively in 62 patients with X chromosome aneuploidy and 21 cases with structural abnormalities of the X chromosome. They found that patients with 2 X inactivation sites where one X was structurally abnormal had significantly fewer cells with X bends than normal 46,XX. In addition, these patients also showed X bends on the normal X more often than would be expected if non-random X inactivation of the abnormal X chromosome was occurring. Five of the 6 patients with a short or long arm deletion or paracentric inversion of Xq were mentally retarded or had other congenital anomalies not usually associated with Turner syndrome. This suggests to them that these clinical findings may be related to interference with X inactivation patterns in cells with a structurally abnormal X chromosome.