细胞内膜泡运输中拴系因子的功能

膜泡运输是不同细胞器间进行物质传递的基本方式,分为4个重要步骤：囊泡的出芽、转运、拴系和融合。在此过程中,有许多相关因子参与调控,如包被蛋白、Rab蛋白、拴系因子、SM蛋白和SNARE等。拴系因子在运输囊泡和靶位膜发生接触的最初阶段起重要调控作用,多数拴系因子形成大的多亚基复合体发挥功能。目前,关于拴系因子的功能已经有了一定的了解,在此,我们对酵母、哺乳动物以及植物细胞中的已知拴系因子的特点和功能进行了概述。     

The transport of Staufen2-containing ribonucleoprotein complexes involves kinesin motor protein and is modulated by mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway

There is increasing evidence showing that mRNA is transported to the neuronal dendrites in ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complexes or RNA granules, which are aggregates of mRNA, rRNA, ribosomal proteins, and RNA-binding proteins. In these RNP complexes, Staufen, a double-stranded RNA-binding protein, is believed to be a core component that plays a key role in the dendritic mRNA transport. This study investigated the molecular mechanisms of the dendritic mRNA transport using green fluorescent protein-tagged Staufen2 produced employing a Sindbis viral expression system. The kinesin heavy chain was found to be associated with Staufen2. The inhibition of kinesin resulted in a significant decrease in the level of dendritic transport of the Staufen2-containing RNP complexes in neurons under non-stimulating or stimulating conditions. This suggests that the dendritic transport of the Staufen2-containing RNP complexes use kinesin as a motor protein. A mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitor, PD98059, inhibited the activity-induced increase in the amount of both the Staufen2-containing RNP complexes and Ca(2+)/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II alpha-subunit mRNA in the distal dendrites of cultured hippocampal neurons. Overall, these results suggest that dendritic mRNA transport is mediated via the Staufen2 and kinesin motor proteins and might be modulated by the neuronal activity and mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway.     

Exploring protein import pores of cellular organelles at the single molecule level using the planar lipid bilayer technique

Proteins of living cells carry out their specialized functions within various subcellular membranes or aqueous spaces. Approximately half of all the proteins of a typical cell are transported into or across membranes. Targeting and transport to their correct subcellular destinations are essential steps in protein biosynthesis. In eukaryotic cells secretory proteins are transported into the endoplasmic reticulum before they are transported in vesicles to the plasma membrane. Virtually all proteins of the endosymbiotic organelles, chloroplasts and mitochondria, are synthesized on cytosolic ribosomes and posttranslationally imported. Genetic and biochemical techniques led to rather detailed knowledge on the subunit composition of the various protein transport complexes which carry out the membrane transport of the preproteins. Conclusive concepts on targeting and cytosolic transport of polypeptides emerged, while still few details on the molecular nature and mechanisms of the channel moieties of protein translocation complexes have been achieved. In this paper we will describe the history of how the individual subunits forming the channel pores of the chloroplast, mitochondrial and endoplasmic reticulum protein import machineries were identified and characterized by single channel electrophysiological techniques in planar bilayers. We will also highlight recent developments in the exploration of the molecular properties of protein translocating channels and the regulation of the diverse protein translocation systems using the planar bilayer technique.     

Structural biology of type VI secretion systems

Type VI secretion systems (T6SSs) are transenvelope complexes specialized in the transport of proteins or domains directly into target cells. These systems are versatile as they can target either eukaryotic host cells and therefore modulate the bacteria-host interaction and pathogenesis or bacterial cells and therefore facilitate access to a specific niche. These molecular machines comprise at least 13 proteins. Although recent years have witnessed advances in the role and function of these secretion systems, little is known about how these complexes assemble in the cell envelope. Interestingly, the current information converges to the idea that T6SSs are composed of two subassemblies, one resembling the contractile bacteriophage tail, whereas the other subunits are embedded in the inner and outer membranes and anchor the bacteriophage-like structure to the cell envelope. In this review, we summarize recent structural information on individual T6SS components emphasizing the fact that T6SSs are composite systems, adapting subunits from various origins.     

Cargo-carrying motor vehicles on the neuronal highway: transport pathways and neurodegenerative disease

Within axons vital cargoes must be transported over great distances along microtubule tracks to maintain neuronal viability. Essential to this system are the molecular motors, kinesin and dynein, which transport a variety of neuronal cargoes. Elucidating the transport pathways, the identity of the cargoes transported, and the regulation of motor-cargo complexes are areas of intense investigation. Evidence suggests that essential components, including signaling proteins, neuroprotective and repair molecules, and vesicular and cytoskeletal components are all transported. In addition newly emerging data indicate that defects in axonal transport pathways may contribute to the initiation or progression of chronic neuronal dysfunction. In this review we concentrate on microtubule-based motor proteins, their linkers, and cargoes and discuss how factors in the axonal transport pathway contribute to disease states. As additional cargo complexes and transport pathways are identified, an understanding of the role these pathways play in the development of human disease will hopefully lead to new diagnostic and treatment strategies.     

How do plant virus nucleic acids move through intercellular connections?

In addition to their function in transport of water, ions, small metabolites, and growth factors in normal plant tissue, the plasmodesmata presumably serve as routes for cell-to-cell movement of plant viruses in infected tissue. Virus cell-to-cell spread through plasmodesmata is an active process mediated by specialized virus encoded movement proteins; however, the mechanism by which these proteins operate is not clear. We incorporate recent information on the biochemical properties of plant virus movement proteins and their interaction with plasmodesmata in a model for transport of nucleic acids through plasmodesmatal channels. We propose that only single stranded (ss) nucleic acids can be transported efficiently through plasmodesmata, and that movement proteins function as molecular chaperones for ss nucleic acids to form unfolded movement protein-ss nucleic acid complexes. These complexes are targeted to plasmodesmata. Plasmodesmatal permeability is then increased following interaction with movement protein and the entire movement complex or its nucleic acid component is translocated across the plasmodesmatal channel.     

Motif-based endomembrane trafficking

Endomembrane trafficking, which allows proteins and lipids to flow between the different endomembrane compartments, largely occurs by vesicle-mediated transport. Transmembrane proteins intended for transport are concentrated into a vesicle or carrier by undulation of a donor membrane. This is followed by vesicle scission, uncoating, and finally, fusion at the target membrane. Three major trafficking pathways operate inside eukaryotic cells: anterograde, retrograde, and endocytic. Each pathway involves a unique set of machinery and coat proteins that pack the transmembrane proteins, along with their associated lipids, into specific carriers. Adaptor and coatomer complexes are major facilitators that function in anterograde transport and in endocytosis. These complexes recognize the transmembrane cargoes destined for transport and recruit the coat proteins that help form the carriers. These complexes use either linear motifs or posttranslational modifications to recognize the cargoes, which are then packaged and delivered along the trafficking pathways. In this review, we focus on the different trafficking complexes that share a common evolutionary branch in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), and we discuss up-to-date knowledge about the cargo recognition motifs they use.

Trafficking protein complexes recognize specific linear motifs or modifications on integral membrane proteins and this recognition guides their transport between the different cellular compartments.

ADVANCED

• Plant research is slowly gaining insight into the linear trafficking motifs used by the various AP complexes.Recent observations point out that steady-state accumulation of cargo proteins at the plasma membrane is not necessarily caused by to impaired internalization.
• TSET/TPC, the most recently identified member of the heterotetrameric adaptor complex-containing coat (HTAC-CC) family, and the identification of an endocytic-autophagosomal degradation pathway operating between the contact sites of the endoplasmic reticulum with the plasma membrane and the vacuole provide previously undiscovered additional layers of complexity to endomembrane trafficking in plants.

     

Transport of functional messenger RNA from liver nuclei in a reconstituted cell-free system

The reliability of a reconstituted cell-free system for messenger RNA processing and transport, consisting of isolated nuclei in fortified cytosol, has been evaluated in terms of the functionality and regulated release of the transported product. The poly(A) messenger RNA transport in vitro formed appropriate initiation complexes with ribosomes in an optimized translation system and had template activity comparable to that transported in vivo. The intra-nuclear origin of this messenger RNA is supported by pulse-labeling studies, its transport from detergent-treated nuclei and the absence of the release under non-transport conditions. Serum albumin was identified by immunoprecipitation and electrophoresis as one of the products synthesized when the transported RNA was translated in vitro. The transport of messenger RNA in the cell-free system was dependent on specific cytosol (soluble cytoplasmic) proteins. These proteins, which constitutes less than 0.1% of the total cytosol proteins, are precipitated wtih streptomycin with high specificity.     

溶酶体相关细胞器生物发生复合体相互作用组构成胞内体运输网络

随着高等生物中十几个新的参与囊泡运输的 Hermansky-Pudlak 综合征(HPS)蛋白质的发现, 认为可能存在一类新的囊泡运输通路。该通路主要由新近鉴定的 3 个被称为溶酶体相关细胞器生物发生复合体(BLOC)所组成, 被分别命名为BLOC-1、BLOC-2 和 BLOC-3。越来越多的证据表明这些复合体与以前认识较清楚的 AP3 和 HOPS 复合体共同在胞内体运输中起重要作用。这些复合体之间的相互作用构成了以胞内体和细胞骨架为连接纽带的参与蛋白质运输的复杂网络。该网络中的每个节点的相互作用可区分为复合体内和复合体外相互作用两大类。复合体之间的联系可以是来自不同复合体亚基间的直接相互作用, 也可以通过耦联的节点联结不同的复合体。解析这一复杂网络有助于进一步了解参与蛋白质和膜运输这一动态而精细网络的结构与功能。一旦该网络结构得到破坏, 则可能导致如 HPS 这类囊泡运输或细胞器发生障碍性疾病。     

Transport and proofreading of proteins by the twin-arginine translocation (Tat) system in bacteria

The twin-arginine translocation (Tat) system operates in plant thylakoid membranes and the plasma membranes of most free-living bacteria. In bacteria, it is responsible for the export of a number of proteins to the periplasm, outer membrane or growth medium, selecting substrates by virtue of cleavable N-terminal signal peptides that contain a key twin-arginine motif together with other determinants. Its most notable attribute is its ability to transport large folded proteins (even oligomeric proteins) across the tightly sealed plasma membrane. In Gram-negative bacteria, TatABC subunits appear to carry out all of the essential translocation functions in the form of two distinct complexes at steady state: a TatABC substrate-binding complex and separate TatA complex. Several studies favour a model in which these complexes transiently coalesce to generate the full translocase. Most Gram-positive organisms possess an even simpler "minimalist" Tat system which lacks a TatB component and contains, instead, a bifunctional TatA component. These Tat systems may involve the operation of a TatAC complex together with a separate TatA complex, although a radically different model for TatAC-type systems has also been proposed. While bacterial Tat systems appear to require the presence of only a few proteins for the actual translocation event, there is increasing evidence for the operation of ancillary components that carry out sophisticated "proofreading" activities. These activities ensure that redox proteins are only exported after full assembly of the cofactor, thereby avoiding the futile export of apo-forms. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled Protein translocation across or insertion into membranes.     

Separation methods in the analysis of protein membrane complexes

The separation of membrane protein complexes can be divided into two categories. One category, which is operated on a relatively large scale, aims to purify the membrane protein complex from membrane fractions while retaining its native form, mainly to characterize its nature. The other category aims to analyze the constituents of the membrane protein complex, usually on a small scale. Both of these face the difficulty of isolating the membrane protein complex without interference originating from the hydrophobic nature of membrane proteins or from the close association with membrane lipids. To overcome this difficulty, many methods have been employed. Crystallized membrane protein complexes are the most successful example of the former category. In these purification methods, special efforts are made in the steps prior to the column chromatography to enrich the target membrane protein complexes. Although there are specific aspects for each complex, the most popular method for isolating these membrane protein complexes is anion-exchange column chromatography, especially using weak anion-exchange columns. Another remarkable trend is metal affinity column chromatography, which purifies the membrane protein complex as an intact complex in one step. Such protein complexes contain subunit proteins which are genetically engineered so as to include multiple-histidine tags at carboxyl- or amino-termini. The key to these successes for multi-subunit complex isolation is the idea of keeping the expression at its physiological level, rather than overexpression. On the other hand, affinity purification using the Fv fragment, in which a Strep tag is genetically introduced, is ideal because this method does not introduce any change to the target protein. These purification methods supported by affinity interaction can be applied to minor membrane protein complexes in the membrane system. Isoelectric focusing (IEF) and blue native (BN) electrophoresis have also been employed to prepare membrane protein complexes. Generally, a combination of two or more chromatographic and/or electrophoretic methods is conducted to separate membrane protein complexes. IEF or BN electrophoresis followed by 2nd dimension electrophoresis serve as useful tools for analytical demand. However, some problems still exist in the 2D electrophoresis using IEF. To resolve such problems, many attempts have been made, e.g. introduction of new chaotropes, surfactants, reductants or supporting matrices. This review will focus in particular on two topics: the preparative methods that achieved purification of membrane protein complexes in the native (intact) form, and the analytical methods oriented to resolve the membrane proteins. The characteristics of these purification and analytical methods will be discussed along with plausible future developments taking into account the nature of membrane protein complexes.     

Small proteins in bacteria – Big challenges in prediction and identification

Proteins with up to 100 amino acids have been largely overlooked due to the challenges associated with predicting and identifying them using traditional methods. Recent advances in bioinformatics and machine learning, DNA sequencing, RNA and Ribo-seq technologies, and mass spectrometry (MS) have greatly facilitated the detection and characterisation of these elusive proteins in recent years. This has revealed their crucial role in various cellular processes including regulation, signalling and transport, as toxins and as folding helpers for protein complexes. Consequently, the systematic identification and characterisation of these proteins in bacteria have emerged as a prominent field of interest within the microbial research community. This review provides an overview of different strategies for predicting and identifying these proteins on a large scale, leveraging the power of these advanced technologies. Furthermore, the review offers insights into the future developments that may be expected in this field.     

The mechanochemistry of integrated motor protein complexes

The assembly of molecular motor proteins into multi-unit protein complexes plays an important role in determining the intracellular transport and trafficking properties of many subcellular commodities. Yet, it is not known how proteins within these complexes interact and function collectively. Considering the established ties between motor transport and diseases, it has become increasingly important to investigate the functional properties of these essential transport ‘motifs’. Doing so requires that the composite motile and force-generating properties of multi-unit motor assemblies are characterized. However, such analyses are typically confounded by a lack of understanding of the links between the structural and mechanical properties of many motor complexes. New experimental challenges also emerge when one examines motor cooperation. Distributions in the mechanical microstates available to motor ensembles must be examined in order to fully understand the transport behavior of multi-motor complexes. Furthermore, mechanisms by which motors communicate must be explored to determine whether motor groups can move cargo together in a truly cooperative fashion. Resolving these issues requires the development of experimental methods that allow the dynamics of complex systems of transport proteins to be monitored with the same precision available to single-molecule biophysical assays. Herein, we discuss key fundamental principles governing the function of motor complexes and their relation to mechanisms that regulate intracellular cargo transport. We also outline new experimental strategies to resolve these essential features of intracellular transport.     

Identification of Protein Transport Complexes in the Chloroplastic Envelope Membranes via Chemical Cross-Linking

Transport of cytoplasmically synthesized proteins into chloroplasts uses an import machinery present in the envelope membranes. To identify the components of this machinery and to begin to examine how these components interact during transport, chemical cross-linking was performed on intact chloroplasts containing precursor proteins trapped at a particular stage of transport by ATP limitation. Large crosslinked complexes were observed using three different reversible homobifunctional cross-linkers. Three outer envelope membrane proteins (OEP86, OEP75, and OEP34) and one inner envelope membrane protein (IEP110), previously reported to be involved in protein import, were identified as components of these complexes. In addition to these membrane proteins, a stromal member of the hsp100 family, ClpC, was also present in the complexes. We propose that ClpC functions as a molecular chaperone, cooperating with other components to accomplish the transport of precursor proteins into chloroplasts. We also propose that each envelope membrane contains distinct translocation complexes and that a portion of these interact to form contact sites even in the absence of precursor proteins.     

Functional cooperation between the microtubule and actin cytoskeletons

In diverse cell types, microtubule (MT) and actin filament networks cooperate functionally during a wide variety of processes, including vesicle and organelle transport, cleavage furrow placement, directed cell migration, spindle rotation, and nuclear migration. The mechanisms by which MTs and actin filaments cooperate to mediate these different processes can be grouped into two broad categories: coordinated MT- and actin-based transport to move vesicles, organelles, and cell fate determinants; and targeting and capture of MT ends at cortical actin sites. Over the past several years, a growing number of cellular factors that bridge these cytoskeletal systems have been identified. These include 'hetero-motor' complexes (physically associated myosin and kinesin), myosin-CLIP170 complexes, formin homology (FH) proteins, dynein and the dynactin complex, Kar9p, coronin, Kelch repeat-containing proteins, and ERM proteins.     

Distinct RNP complexes of shuttling hnRNP proteins with pre-mRNA and mRNA: candidate intermediates in formation and export of mRNA

Nascent pre-mRNAs associate with hnRNP proteins in hnRNP complexes, the natural substrates for mRNA processing. Several lines of evidence indicate that hnRNP complexes undergo substantial remodeling during mRNA formation and export. Here we report the isolation of three distinct types of pre-mRNP and mRNP complexes from HeLa cells associated with hnRNP A1, a shuttling hnRNP protein. Based on their RNA and protein compositions, these complexes are likely to represent distinct stages in the nucleocytoplasmic shuttling pathway of hnRNP A1 with its bound RNAs. In the cytoplasm, A1 is associated with its nuclear import receptor (transportin), the cytoplasmic poly(A)-binding protein, and mRNA. In the nucleus, A1 is found in two distinct types of complexes that are differently associated with nuclear structures. One class contains pre-mRNA and mRNA and is identical to previously described hnRNP complexes. The other class behaves as freely diffusible nuclear mRNPs (nmRNPs) at late nuclear stages of maturation and possibly associated with nuclear mRNA export. These nmRNPs differ from hnRNPs in that while they contain shuttling hnRNP proteins, the mRNA export factor REF, and mRNA, they do not contain nonshuttling hnRNP proteins or pre-mRNA. Importantly, nmRNPs also contain proteins not found in hnRNP complexes. These include the alternatively spliced isoforms D01 and D02 of the hnRNP D proteins, the E0 isoform of the hnRNP E proteins, and LRP130, a previously reported protein with unknown function that appears to have a novel type of RNA-binding domain. The characteristics of these complexes indicate that they result from RNP remodeling associated with mRNA maturation and delineate specific changes in RNP protein composition during formation and transport of mRNA in vivo.     

Microtubule gelation-contraction in vitro and its relationship to component a of slow axonal transport

Microtubule proteins, isolated by cycles of assembly, will undergo ATP-dependent gelation-contraction in vitro. A particulate component is present in these preparations, which is required for the gelation-contraction of microtubules assembled from purified tubulin. These particulates contain tubulin, neurofilament, spectrin, MAP2, and other as yet unidentified proteins. The particulates have a microtubule-stimulated ATPase that may be unique and is the likely motor for microtubule gelation-contraction. The basic structural unit of these particulates appears to be a crescent-shaped, or hemispherical, granule about 20 nm in diameter. The particles move along microtubule walls at a rate of about 1 micron. When compared to known physiological phenomena, microtubule gelation-contraction has striking similarities to component a of slow axonal transport (SCa), but displays no relationship to slow component b or to fast transport. On the basis of their similarities in composition, solubility, and rate of movement, we have proposed that the particulates responsible for microtubule gelation-contraction are the insoluble protein complexes, which have been suggested to be the transported component of SCa. We have termed these structures "slow component a particulates" or "SCAPs." It is probable that similar motile protein complexes exist in cells other than neurons, and we propose the term "dynasome" to describe such structures in general.