The Escherichia coli UvrD helicase is essential for Tus removal during recombination-dependent replication restart from Ter sites

Blocking replication forks in the Escherichia coli chromosome by ectopic Ter sites renders the RecBCD pathway of homologous recombination and SOS induction essential for viability. In this work, we show that the E. coli helicase II (UvrD) is also essential for the growth of cells where replication forks are arrested at ectopic Ter sites. We propose that UvrD is required for Tus removal from Ter sites. The viability of a SOS non-inducible Ter-blocked strain is fully restored by the expression of the two SOS-induced proteins UvrD and RecA at high level, indicating that these are the only two SOS-induced proteins required for replication across Ter/Tus complexes. Several observations suggest that UvrD acts in concert with homologous recombination and we propose that UvrD is associated with recombination-initiated replication forks and that it removes Tus when a PriA-dependent, restarted replication fork goes across the Ter/Tus complex. Finally, expression of the UvrD homologue from Bacilus subtilis PcrA restores the growth of uvrD-deficient Ter-blocked cells, indicating that the capacity to dislodge Tus is conserved in this distant bacterial species.     

Mutational bias suggests that replication termination occurs near the dif site, not at Ter sites

In bacteria, Ter sites bound to Tus/Rtp proteins halt replication forks moving only in one direction, providing a convenient mechanism to terminate them once the chromosome had been replicated. Considering the importance of replication termination and its position as a checkpoint in cell division, the accumulated knowledge on these systems has not dispelled fundamental questions regarding its role in cell biology: why are there so many copies of Ter, why are they distributed over such a large portion of the chromosome, why is the tus gene not conserved among bacteria, and why do tus mutants lack measurable phenotypes? Here we examine bacterial genomes using bioinformatics techniques to identify the region(s) where DNA polymerase III‐mediated replication has historically been terminated. We find that in both Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis, changes in mutational bias patterns indicate that replication termination most likely occurs at or near the dif site. More importantly, there is no evidence from mutational bias signatures that replication forks originating at oriC have terminated at Ter sites. We propose that Ter sites participate in halting replication forks originating from DNA repair events, and not those originating at the chromosomal origin of replication.     

A replication terminus located at or near a replication checkpoint of Bacillus subtilis functions independently of stringent control

We have examined a replication terminus (psiL1) located on the left arm of the chromosome of Bacillus subtilis and within the yxcC gene and at or near the left replication checkpoint that is activated under stringent conditions. The psiL1 sequence appears to bind to two dimers of the replication terminator protein (RTP) rather weakly and seems to possess overlapping core and auxiliary sites that have some sequence similarities with normal Ter sites. Surprisingly, the asymmetrical, isolated psiL1 site arrested replication forks in vivo in both orientations and independent of stringent control. In vitro, the sequence arrested DnaB helicase in both orientations, albeit more weakly than the normal Ter1 terminus. The key points of mechanistic interest that emerge from the present work are: (i) strong binding of a Ter (psiL1) sequence to RTP did not appear to be essential for fork arrest and (ii) polarity of fork arrest could not be correlated in this case with just symmetrical protein-DNA interaction at the core and auxiliary sites of psiL1. On the basis of the result it would appear that the weak RTP-L1Ter interaction cannot by itself account for fork arrest, thus suggesting a role for DnaB-RTP interaction.     

Requirement for RecFOR-mediated recombination in priA mutant

Restart of arrested replication forks is an important process and PriA, the main Escherichia coli replication restart protein, is essential for viability under any condition that increases the frequency of fork arrest. In priA mutant, replication forks are arrested by spontaneously occurring roadblocks and blocked replication forks persist as a result of the defect in replication restart. In the present work, we analysed how recombination proteins contribute to the viability of the priA mutant. RecFOR-mediated homologous recombination occurs in a large fraction of priA mutant cells, indicating a frequent formation of DNA single strand gaps and their recombinational repair. This high level of homologous recombination renders the proteins that resolve Holliday junctions recombination intermediates essential for viability. When homologous recombination is blocked at early steps by recFOR or recA inactivation, exonuclease V-mediated DNA degradation is required for full viability of priA mutants, indicating that unrepaired gaps are broken and that DNA degradation of the broken DNA allows the formation of viable cells. Models for the formation of single strand DNA gaps consequently to a replication restart defect and for gap processing are proposed.     

RecA-mediated rescue of Escherichia coli strains with replication forks arrested at the terminus

The recombinational rescue of chromosome replication was investigated in Escherichia coli strains with the unidirectional origin oriR1, from the plasmid R1, integrated within oriC in clockwise (intR1(CW)) or counterclockwise (intR1(CC)) orientations. Only the intR1(CC) strain, with replication forks arrested at the terminus, required RecA for survival. Unlike the strains with RecA-dependent replication known so far, the intR1(CC) strain did not require RecBCD, RecF, RecG, RecJ, RuvAB, or SOS activation for viability. The overall levels of degradation of replicating chromosomes caused by inactivation of RecA were similar in oriC and intR1(CC) strains. In the intR1(CC) strain, RecA was also needed to maintain the integrity of the chromosome when the unidirectional replication forks were blocked at the terminus. This was consistent with suppression of the RecA dependence of the intR1(CC) strain by inactivating Tus, the protein needed to block replication forks at Ter sites. Thus, RecA is essential during asymmetric chromosome replication for the stable maintenance of the forks arrested at the terminus and for their eventual passage across the termination barrier(s) independently of the SOS and some of the major recombination pathways.     

Replication arrests during a single round of replication of the Escherichia coli chromosome in the absence of DnaC activity

We used a flow cytometric assay to determine the frequency of replication fork arrests during a round of chromosome replication in Escherichia coli. After synchronized initiation from oriC in a dnaC(Ts) strain, non-permissive conditions were imposed, such that active DnaC was not available during elongation. Under these conditions, about 18% of the cells failed to complete chromosome replication. The sites of replication arrests were random and occurred on either arm of the bidirectionally replicating chromosome, as stalled forks accumulated at the terminus from both directions. The forks at the terminal Ter sites disappeared in the absence of Tus protein, as the active forks could then pass through the terminus to reach the arrest site, and the unfinished rounds of replication would be completed without DnaC. In a dnaC2(Ts)rep double mutant, almost all cells failed to complete chromosome replication in the absence of DnaC activity. As inactivation of Rep helicase (the rep gene product) has been shown to cause frequent replication arrests inducing double-strand breaks (DSBs) in a replicating chromosome, DnaC activity appears to be essential for replication restart from DSBs during elongation.     

Loss of RecA function affects the ability of Escherichia coli to maintain recombinant plasmids containing a Ter site.

In the Escherichia coli chromosome, DNA replication forks arrested by a Tus-Ter complex or by DNA damage are reinitiated through pathways that involve RecA and numerous other recombination functions. To examine the role of recombination in the processing of replication forks arrested by a Tus-Ter complex, the requirements for recombination-associated gene products were assessed in cells carrying Ter plasmids, i.e., plasmids that contain a Ter site oriented to block DNA replication. Of the E. coli recombination functions tested, only loss of recA conferred an observable phenotype on cells containing a Ter plasmid, which was inefficient transformation and reduced ability to maintain a Ter plasmid when Tus was expressed. Given the current understanding of replication reinitiation, the simplest explanation for the restriction of Ter plasmid maintenance was a reduced ability to restart plasmid replication in a recA tus(+) background. However, we were unable to detect a difference in the efficiency of replication arrest by Tus in recA-proficient and recA-deficient cells, which suggests that the inability to restart arrested replication forks is not the cause of the restriction on growth, but is due to an additional function provided by RecA. Other explanations for restriction of Ter plasmid maintenance were examined, including plasmid multimerization, plasmid rearrangements, and copy number differences. The most likely cause of the restriction on Ter plasmid maintenance was a reduced copy number in recA cells that was detected when the copy number was measured in relation to an external control. Possibly, loss of RecA function leads to improper processing of replication forks arrested at a Ter site, leading to the generation of degradation-prone substrates.     

Tus-mediated arrest of DNA replication in Escherichia coli is modulated by DNA supercoiling

In the absence of RecA, expression of the Tus protein of Escherichia coli is lethal when ectopic Ter sites are inserted into the chromosome in an orientation that blocks completion of chromosome replication. Using this observation as a basis for genetic selection, an extragenic suppressor of Tus-mediated arrest of DNA replication was isolated with diminished ability of Tus to halt DNA replication. Resistance to tus expression mapped to a mutation in the stop codon of the topA gene (topA869), generating an elongated topoisomerase I protein with a marked reduction in activity. Other alleles of topA with mutations in the carboxyl-terminal domain of topoisomerase I, topA10 and topA66, also rendered recA strains with blocking Ter sites insensitive to tus expression. Thus, increased negative supercoiling in the DNA of these mutants reduced the ability of Tus-Ter complexes to arrest DNA replication. The increase in superhelical density did not diminish replication arrest by disrupting Tus-Ter interactions, as Tus binding to Ter sites was essentially unaffected by the topA mutations. The topA869 mutation also relieved the requirement for recombination functions other than recA to restart replication, such as recC, ruvA and ruvC, indicating that the primary effect of the increased negative supercoiling was to interfere with Tus blockage of DNA replication. Introduction of gyrB mutations in combination with the topA869 mutation restored supercoiling density to normal values and also restored replication arrest at Ter sites, suggesting that supercoiling alone modulated Tus activity. We propose that increased negative supercoiling enhances DnaB unwinding activity, thereby reducing the duration of the Tus-DnaB interaction and leading to decreased Tus activity.     

Binding of the replication terminator protein Fob1p to the Ter sites of yeast causes polar fork arrest

Fob1p protein has been implicated in the termination of replication forks at the two tandem termini present in the non-transcribed spacer region located between the sequences encoding the 35 S and the 5 S RNAs of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. However, the biochemistry and mode of action of this protein were previously unknown. We have purified the Fob1p protein to near-homogeneity, and we developed a novel technique to show that it binds specifically to the Ter1 and Ter2 sequences. Interestingly, the two sequences share no detectable homology. We present two lines of evidence showing that the interaction of the Fob1p with the Ter sites causes replication termination. First, a mutant of FOB1, L104S, that significantly reduced the binding of the mutant form of the protein to the tandem Ter sites, also failed to promote replication termination in vivo. The mutant did not diminish nucleolar transport, and interaction of the mutant form of Fob1p with itself and with another protein encoded in the locus YDR026C suggested that the mutation did not cause global misfolding of the protein. Second, DNA site mutations in the Ter sequences that separately and specifically abolished replication fork arrest at Ter1 or Ter2 also eliminated sequence-specific binding of the Fob1p to the two sites. The work presented here definitively established Ter DNA-Fob1p interaction as an important step in fork arrest.     

Differential Tus-Ter binding and lock formation: implications for DNA replication termination in Escherichia coli

In E. coli, DNA replication termination occurs at Ter sites and is mediated by Tus. Two clusters of five Ter sites are located on each side of the terminus region and constrain replication forks in a polar manner. The polarity is due to the formation of the Tus-Ter-lock intermediate. Recently, it has been shown that DnaB helicase which unwinds DNA at the replication fork is preferentially stopped at the non-permissive face of a Tus-Ter complex without formation of the Tus-Ter-lock and that fork pausing efficiency is sequence dependent, raising two essential questions: Does the affinity of Tus for the different Ter sites correlate with fork pausing efficiency? Is formation of the Tus-Ter-lock the key factor in fork pausing? The combined use of surface plasmon resonance and GFP-Basta showed that Tus binds strongly to TerA-E and G, moderately to TerH-J and weakly to TerF. Out of these ten Ter sites only two, TerF and H, were not able to form significant Tus-Ter-locks. Finally, Tus's resistance to dissociation from Ter sites and the strength of the Tus-Ter-locks correlate with the differences in fork pausing efficiency observed for the different Ter sites by Duggin and Bell (2009).     

Deletions at stalled replication forks occur by two different pathways.

Replication blockage induces non-homologous deletions in Escherichia coli. The mechanism of the formation of these deletions was investigated. A pBR322-mini-oriC hybrid plasmid carrying two E. coli replication terminators (Ter sites) in opposite orientations was used. Deletions which remove at least the pBR322 blocking site (named Ter1) occurred at a frequency of 2 x 10(-6) per generation. They fall into two equally large classes: deletions that join sequences with no homology, and others that join sequences of 3-10 bp of homology. Some 95% of the deletions in the former class resulted from the fusion of sequences immediately preceding the two Ter sites, indicating a direct role for blocked replication forks in their formation. These deletions were not found in a topA10 mutant, suggesting a topoisomerase I-mediated process. In contrast, deletions joining short homologous sequences were not affected by the topA10 mutation. However, the incidence of this second class of deletions increased 10-fold in a recD mutant, devoid of exonuclease V activity. This indicates that linear molecules are intermediates in their formation. In addition, approximately 50% of these deletions were clustered in the region flanking the Ter1 site. We propose that they are produced by repair of molecules broken at the blocked replication forks.     

Mutational bias suggests that replication termination occurs near the dif site,not at Ter sites: what's the Dif?

In this issue of Molecular Microbiology, Hendrickson and Lawrence analyse the sequence of bacterial genomes to map the historical traffic pattern of chromosome replication. Their surprising conclusion is that most forks terminate at the dif site rather than at the Tus/Ter sites where most investigators have concluded termination occurs most frequently. What make this analysis novel are the methods and the revisionist hypotheses for how and why forks might stop at dif.     

Mechanistic insights into replication termination as revealed by investigations of the Reb1-Ter3 complex of Schizosaccharomyces pombe

Relatively little is known about the interaction of eukaryotic replication terminator proteins with the cognate termini and the replication termination mechanism. Here, we report a biochemical analysis of the interaction of the Reb1 terminator protein of Schizosaccharomyces pombe, which binds to the Ter3 site present in the nontranscribed spacers of ribosomal DNA, located in chromosome III. We show that Reb1 is a dimeric protein and that the N-terminal dimerization domain of the protein is dispensable for replication termination. Unlike its mammalian counterpart Ttf1, Reb1 did not need an accessory protein to bind to Ter3. The two myb/SANT domains and an adjacent, N-terminal 154-amino-acid-long segment (called the myb-associated domain) were both necessary and sufficient for optimal DNA binding in vitro and fork arrest in vivo. The protein and its binding site Ter3 were unable to arrest forks initiated in vivo from ars of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in the cell milieu of the latter despite the facts that the protein retained the proper affinity of binding, was located in vivo at the Ter site, and apparently was not displaced by the “sweepase” Rrm3. These observations suggest that replication fork arrest is not an intrinsic property of the Reb1-Ter3 complex.     

Insertion of inverted Ter sites into the terminus region of the Escherichia coli chromosome delays completion of DNA replication and disrupts the cell cycle

To investigate the co-ordination between DNA replication and cell division, we have disrupted the DNA replication cycle of Escherichia coli by inserting inverted Ter sites into the terminus region to delay completion of the chromosome. The inverted Ter sites (designated Inv Ter :: spc ^r) were initially inserted into the chromosome of a Δ tus strain to allow unrestrained chromosomal replication. We then introduced a functional tus gene by transforming the Inv Ter :: spc ^r strain with a plasmid carrying the tus gene under control of an arabinose-inducible promoter. In the presence of 0.2% arabinose, the cells formed long filaments, suggesting that activation of the inverted Ter sites by Tus arrested DNA replication and delayed the onset of cell division. Induction of sfiA , a gene in the SOS regulon, was observed following arrest of DNA replication; however, when a sfiB114 allele was introduced into Inv Ter :: spc ^r strain, long filaments were still formed, suggesting that the sfi -independent pathway also caused filamentation. Either recA :: cam ^r or lexA3 alleles suppressed filamentation when introduced in the Inv Ter strain. Interestingly, in both the recA :: cam ^r and lexA3 mutants, virtually all cells had a nucleoid, suggesting that cell division was proceeding even though DNA replication was not complete. These results suggest that DNA replication and cell division are uncoupled when recA is inactivated or when genes repressed by LexA cannot be induced.     

真核细胞染色体DNA复制起始及复制叉稳定性维持的机制

在真核生物中,DNA复制在染色体上特定的多位点起始．当细胞处在晚M及G1期,多个复制起始蛋白依次结合到DNA复制源,组装形成复制前复合体．pre．RC在Gl-S的转折期得到激活,随后,多个直接参与DNA复制又形成的蛋白结合到DNA复制源,启动DNA的复制,形成两个双向的DNA复制又．在染色体上,移动的DNA复制又经常会碰到复制障碍（二级DNA结构、一些蛋白的结合位点、损伤的碱基等）而暂停下来,此时,需要细胞周期检验点的调控来稳定复制叉,否则,会导致复制又垮塌及基因组不稳定．本文就真核细胞染色体DNA复制起始的机制,以及复制又稳定性的维持机制进行简要综述．     

A newly identified DNA replication terminus site, TerE, on the Escherichia coli chromosome.

To search for heretofore unidentified DNA replication termination (Ter) sites on the Escherichia coli chromosome, we screened the entire Kohara lambda bacteriophage library using as probes the four known 22-bp Ter sequences. We found a Ter site, which we named TerE, located at 23.2 min on the linkage map. TerE inhibits only counterclockwise DNA replication. Macroscopically, five Ter sites are located in a periodic arrangement on the genome.     

Chromosome structuring limits genome plasticity in Escherichia coli

Chromosome organizations of related bacterial genera are well conserved despite a very long divergence period. We have assessed the forces limiting bacterial genome plasticity in Escherichia coli by measuring the respective effect of altering different parameters, including DNA replication, compositional skew of replichores, coordination of gene expression with DNA replication, replication-associated gene dosage, and chromosome organization into macrodomains. Chromosomes were rearranged by large inversions. Changes in the compositional skew of replichores, in the coordination of gene expression with DNA replication or in the replication-associated gene dosage have only a moderate effect on cell physiology because large rearrangements inverting the orientation of several hundred genes inside a replichore are only slightly detrimental. By contrast, changing the balance between the two replication arms has a more drastic effect, and the recombinational rescue of replication forks is required for cell viability when one of the chromosome arms is less than half than the other one. Macrodomain organization also appears to be a major factor restricting chromosome plasticity, and two types of inverted configurations severely affect the cell cycle. First, the disruption of the Ter macrodomain with replication forks merging far from the normal replichore junction provoked chromosome segregation defects. The second major problematic configurations resulted from inversions between Ori and Right macrodomains, which perturb nucleoid distribution and early steps of cytokinesis. Consequences for the control of the bacterial cell cycle and for the evolution of bacterial chromosome configuration are discussed.     

Site-directed mutagenesis and phylogenetic comparisons of the Escherichia coli Tus protein: DNA-protein interactions alone can not account for Tus activity

The Tus protein of Escherichia coli is capable of arresting DNA replication in an orientation-dependent manner when bound to specific sequences in the bacterial chromosome called Ter sites. Arrest of DNA replication has been postulated to occur either by a barrier mechanism, where Tus acts as a physical block to replication fork progression, or through protein-protein interactions between Tus and some component of the replication fork. A previous mutational analysis of Tus suggested that the amino acids in the L1 loop might play a role in replication arrest. Site-directed mutagenesis of amino acids in the L1 loop and other amino acid residues on the "non-permissive" face of Tus was performed to identify residues that affected Tus function. One mutant, E47Q, gave results that are inconsistent with the barrier model, showing a greater affinity for the Ter site (with a t 1/2 of 348 min versus 150 min for wild-type Tus) but a reduced ability to arrest DNA replication in vivo. In addition to the site-directed mutagenesis studies, the tus genes of Salmonella, Klebsiella, and Yersinia were sequenced and the proteins expressed in E. coli to assess their ability to arrest DNA replication. The results presented here support a role for protein-protein interactions in Tus function, and suggest that residues E47 and E49 participate in replication fork arrest.