The orientation of flies towards visual patterns: On the search for the underlying functional interactions

The average optomotor response of insects to a given visual stimulus (measured in open-loop conditions) can be decomposed into a direction sensitive and a direction insensitive component. This decomposition is conceptual and always possible. The direction sensitive optomotor response represents the “classical” optomotor reflex, already studied in previous investigations; the direction insensitive optomotor response is strictly connected to the orientation and tracking behaviour (see the work of Reichardt and coworkers). Thus a characterization of the direction insensitive response is useful in clarifying the nervous mechanisms underlying the orientation behaviour. For this reason we study in this paper the direction insensitive optomotor (torque) response of fixed flying fliesMusca domestica. Periodic gratings, either moving or flickering, represent our main stimulus, since the dependence of the fly response on the spatial wavelength can unravel the presence and properties of the underlying lateral interactions. In this connection an extension of the Volterra series formalism to multi-input (nervous) networks is first outlined in order to connect our (behavioural) input-output data with the interactive structure of the network. A number of results concerning, for instance, the response of such networks to flickered and moving gratings are derived; they are not restricted to our behavioural results and may be relevant in other fields of neuroscience. These theoretical considerations provide the logical framework of our experimental investigation. The main results are:

1. the direction insensitive optomotor response depends on the spatial frequency of a moving grating, implying the existence of (nonlinear) lateral interactions,
2. its wavelength dependence changes with age, unlike the direction sensitive response,
3. both the direction insensitive response and the (closed loop) orientation behaviour are present only in the lower part of the eye; on the other hand the direction sensitive response is present in every part of the two eyes.

Furthermore the attraction towards a flickered periodic grating shows, as theoretically expected, a wavelength-dependence similar to that of the direction insensitive response, again present only in the lower part of the eye. The interactions which affect the orientation response are selective with respect to the spatiotemporal mapping of the pattern onto the receptor array. It is conjectured that these interactions are the basic mechanisms underlying spontaneous pattern discrimination in flies. Their possible organization is further discussed in terms of our formalism. Moreover our data suggest that two specific nervous circuitries correspond to our conceptual decomposition of the optomotor response.     

用红外方法对蝇翅视动行为的探索

本文报告了利用红外装置对蝇翅视动行为实验研究的初步结果及其分析:1.在红外探测器探测到的信号中找到了一个能反映蝇翅拍动幅度的参数.2.双侧、单侧刺激域的宽度及刺激域的高度对视动反应发生几率在一定范围内正相关,当超过一阈值(即饱和阈值)后,即出现稳定的视动反应,它们的饱和阈值分别为60°,30°,40°刺激条纹的亮度生有类似情况.刺激条纹的运动速度在一定范围内对视动反应无影响.3.当刺激没有达到饱和时,蝇翅出现断续的典型的视动反应,即“0-1波动反应”.4.单侧条纹由前向后运动时,蝇翅出现典型反应,而条纹从后向前运动时,不出现典型的视动反应或反应很弱.双侧刺激时,条纹向前运动几乎不诱发反应;条纹向后运动诱发明显的蝇翅视动反应,且蝇翅平面的方向在拍动过程中发生变化.     

The pursuit response of the housefly and its interaction with the optomotor response

Summary Pursuit responses that are probably involved in chasing behavior can be evoked and quantitatively measured in male houseflies under conditions of tethered flight (Figs. 2, 3, 5). Pursuit responses of females are significantly different from those of males (Table 1).Characteristics of the pursuit response are compared with those of the optomotor response to show that they are mediated by different neural subsystems that are in parallel. A slow system mediates the optomotor response, while a much faster system mediates the pursuit response (Table 1).The interaction between the pursuit response and the optomotor response is one of switching. The optomotor stimulus, when presented alone, evokes the optomotor response. When the pursuit stimulus is superposed, the fly switches from the optomotor system to the pursuit system, and ignores the optomotor stimulus. When the pursuit stimulus is removed, the animal switches back to the optomotor system (Fig. 8).We wish to thank Dr. M.F. Land for his valuable suggestion for measuring the optomotor response. This work was supported by NEI grants EY 01140 and EY 00785.     

Comparison between the movement detection systems underlying the optomotor and the landing response in the housefly

Flies evaluate movement within their visual field in order to control the course of flight and to elicit landing manoeuvres. Although the motor output of the two types of responses is quite different, both systems can be compared with respect to the underlying movement detection systems. For a quantitative comparison, both responses were measured during tethered flight under identical conditions. The stimulus was a sinusoidal periodic pattern of vertical stripes presented bilaterally in the fronto-lateral eye region of the fly. To release the landing response, the pattern was moved on either side from front to back. The latency of the response depends on the stimulus conditions and was measured by means of an infrared light-beam that was interrupted whenever the fly lifted its forelegs to assume a preprogrammed landing posture (Borst and Bahde 1986). As an optomotor stimulus the pattern moved on one side from front to back and on the other side in the opposite direction. The induced turning tendency was measured by a torque meter (Götz 1964). The response values which will be compared are the inverse latencies of the landing response and the amplitude of the yaw torque.

1. Optomotor course-control is more sensitive to pattern movement at small spatial wavelengths (10° and 20°) than the landing response (Fig. 1a and b). This suggests that elementary movement detectors (EMDs, Buchner 1976) with large detection base (the distance between interacting visual elements) contribute more strongly to the landing than to the optomotor system.
2. The optimum contrast frequencies of the different responses obtained at a comparatively high pattern contrast of about 0.6 was found to be between 1 and 10 Hz for the optomotor response, and around 20 Hz for the landing response (Fig. 2a and b). This discrepancy can be explained by the fact that the optomotor response was tested under stationary conditions (several seconds of stimulation) while for the landing response transient response characteristics of the movement detectors have to be taken into account (landing occurs under these conditions within less than 100 ms after onset of the movement stimulus). To test the landing system under more stationary conditions, the pattern contrast had to be reduced to low values. This led to latencies of several seconds. Then the optimum of the landing response is around 4 Hz. This is in the optimum range of the optomotor course-control response. The result suggests the same filter time constants for the movement detectors of both systems.
3. The dependence of both responses on the position and the size of the pattern was examined. The landing response has its optimum sensitivity more ventrally than the optomotor response (Fig. 3a and b). Both response amplitudes increase with the size of the pattern in a similar progression (Fig. 3c and d).

In first approximation, the present results are compatible with the assumption of a common set of movement detectors for both the optomotor course-control and the landing system. Movement detectors with different sampling bases and at different positions in the visual field seem to contribute with different gain to both responses. Accordingly, the control systems underlying both behaviors are likely to be independent already at the level of spatial integration of the detector output.     

Regional specialization for an optomotor response in the honeybee compound eye

ABSTRACT. The optomotor head-turning response of the honeybee ( Apis mellifera ) to a horizontally moving stripe pattern was analysed after occlusion of specific regions of the compound eye. The dorsal half of the eye and the medial region appear to be irrelevant to this behavioural reflex. Occlusion of the ventrolateral portion of the eye, however, even with the remainder of the eye unoccluded, rendered the optomotor system blind. The optomotor response was found to be mediated by an area roughly equal to one-fifth of the total eye surface with some redundancy in the system, since occlusion of at least half of the zone did not significantly impair the response. These results support the hypothesis of physically separate visual subsystems in the bee eye which are adapted for different functions.     

Reafferent control of optomotor yaw torque inDrosophila melanogaster

Summary In the flight simulator the optomotor response ofDrosophila melanogaster does not operate as a simple feedback loop. Reafferent and exafferent motion stimuli are processed differently. Under open-loop conditions responses to motion are weaker than under closed-loop conditions. It takes the fly less than 100 ms to distinguish reafferent from exafferent motion. In closed-loop conditions, flies constantly generate torque fluctuations leading to small-angle oscillations of the panorama. This reafferent motion stimulus facilitates the response to exafferent motion but does not itself elicit optomotor responses. Reafference control appears to be directionally selective: while a displacement of the patternm by as little as 0.1° against the expected direction leads to a fast syndirectional torque response, displacements in the expected direction have no comparable effect. Based on the behavior of the mutantrol sol, which under open-loop conditions is directionally motion-blind but in closed-loop conditions still performs optomotor balance, a model is proposed in which the fly's endogenous torque fluctuations are an essential part of the course control process. It is argued that the model may also account for wild type optomotor balance in the flight simulator.     

The effect of strenuous exercise and beta-adrenergic blockade on the visual performance of juvenile rainbow trout,Oncorhynchus mykiss

It is hypothesised that the visual performance of rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss, will be impaired by strenuous exercise as a result of metabolic stress (blood lactacidosis) that activates the Root effect and limits the oxygen-carrying capacity of blood flowing to the eye. The ability to resolve high contrast objects on a moving background, as a measure of visual performance, was quantified pre- and post-exercise using the optomotor response. Strenuous exercise induced a metabolic acidosis (8.0 mmol l(-1) blood lactate) and a significant red cell swelling response but no change in the optomotor response threshold (120 min of arc) was observed. Beta-adrenergic blockade (propranolol) abolished post-exercise red cell swelling but optomotor response thresholds were still maintained at 120 min of arc despite a significant blood lactate load (7.8 mmol l(-1)). The choroid rete mirabile of the trout is extremely well developed (rete area:eye area = 0.39) and may maintain visual performance by ensuring a relatively direct supply of oxygen to the central regions of the avascular retina. Exercised fish under beta-adrenergic blockade exhibited an enhanced optomotor response at 240-300 min of arc. Assuming that these responses reflect "tunnel vision", adrenergic regulation of red cell function may preserve a high ocular PO(2) gradient that satisfies the oxygen demand of peripheral retinal cells.     

RHEOTROPISM IN FISHES

(1) The fluid properties of air and water enable animals to orientate to flow and this behaviour in water is termed rheotaxis. Fish, however, have a wide range of responses to currents, extending beyond simple orientation, and the term rheotropism is therefore used as a ‘portmanteau’ word to describe all such reactions. (2) Fish detect currents directly by flow over the body surface or indirectly by other stimuli. Indirect responses are more common and occur in response to visual, tactile and inertial stimuli resulting from displacement of the fish by the current. Reactions to displacement of visual images are called optomotor reactions. The lateral line is not involved except in the detection of small localized jets of water. It has not been demonstrated that any fish can detect the current by electrical stimuli, although it is theoretically possible for some to do so. (3) In the basic form of rhotaxis the fish heads upstream and maintains station by stemming the current. Current detection thresholds fall within the range 0.4 to 10 cm/s for tactile stimuli but may be as low as 0.03 cm/s for visual stimuli. (4) Visual responses have been studied by simulating displacement by the current in optomotor apparatus. Fish respond to a rotating black-and-white-striped background by compensatory movements of the head and eyes - optokinetic nystagmus - or by the optomotor reaction, in which the fish swims with the background. (5) Fish show an orthokinesis in optomotor apparatus, their mean swimming speed increasing with the speed of rotation of the background. The precise form of the relationship varies between species and there is also considerable individual variation in performance. Fish accelerate and decelerate relative to the background, fixating on a particular stripe for short periods. (6) Factors limiting the appearance of the optomotor response are contrast, illuminance, acuity, critical flicker fusion frequency and spectral sensitivity. (7) Fish tolerate retinal image movements equivalent to those received when they are carried forwards by the current but not to those received when they are carried backwards. There are ganglion cells in the optic tectum which are sensitive to the direction of movement of targets across the visual field. In the goldfish there are significantly more units sensitive to movements in the temporo-nasal than in the opposite direction. (8) There are close parallels between the behaviour of fish in schools and in an optomotor apparatus. The optomotor response is apparently innate, occurring in newly hatched fry. (9) Physical and chemical factors can modify rheotaxis. Temperature and olfactory stimuli affect both the sign of the taxis and the kinetic component of the behaviour. (10) Thyroid hormones which are involved in the control of migration have been shown to affect the kinetic component of rheotaxis. (11) Fish show a number of hydrodynamic adaptations to life in currents. Morphological modifications are greatest in fish from torrential streams, which show extreme dorsoventral flattening and have specialized adhesive organs. Other fish select areas of low velocity or decrease their buoyancy with increasing current speed. (12) Rheotropic behaviour plays an important role in the distribution of fish within stream systems, in the maintenance of territory and station and in feeding behaviour. Territory, station and spawning sites in salmonids are all selected in relation to water velocity. (13) Water currents are thought to provide either a transport system or directional clues for fish on migration. The fish either does not respond to the current and is carried passively downstream, or it makes an orientated movement, swimming up- or downstream. (14) Eggs and larvae are known to drift passively downstream from their spawning grounds and some adult fish may also drift passively. In the sea both adult and juvenile fish use a form of modulated drift associated with vertical migration. Fish move up into midwater either by direct tidal selection or in relation to the diel cycle of illuminance. In fresh water the downstream migrations of salmonid fry, and smolts under some conditions, occur by modulated drift. (15) There is no evidence that fish migrating in the sea orientate to the current, but in fresh water the upstream migrations of diadromous fish are clearly orientated movements. (16) Water velocity is a major factor for salmonids migrating upstream. For fry it limits the occurrence of upstream migrations and for adults it can also prevent upstream movement. But migrations are often initiated by freshets, and changing water velocity is thought to be the most important factor associated with a freshet. (17) Both environmental and genetic factors affect the direction of migration in relation to the current. In some sockeye salmon fry direction is determined by temperature, but in others the overall direction of movement is genetically determined and environmental factors only modify the behaviour. (18) Rheotropic behaviour has a number of important practical applications in the capture of fish and in guiding them past dams and power stations. (19) The optomotor response plays a basic role in the capture of roundfish by trawls under conditions when the fish can see the gear. Many fish are caught because they become fatigued after a prolonged period of swimming at the same speed as the trawl. (20) Most success in guiding fish away from hazardous areas and bypassing them round dams has been achieved with mechanical barriers which depend on rheotropic reactions of the fish. (21) Louvre screens are very successful in deflecting juvenile salmonids migrating downstream past small dams but are impracticable at large dams. Instead, the turbine intakes are commonly sited at a considerable depth and fish are bypassed by mechanical screens either at the surface of the forebay or into the gatewells immediately upstream of the turbine intakes. (22) With upstream migrants the basic problem is to attract fish to the lower end of the fishways. An adequate ‘attraction velocity’ is an important feature of fishways, which must be sited so that the fish avoid the high velocity discharges from spillways and turbines.     

The three-dimensional optomotor torque system ofDrosophila melanogaster

Summary The well known optomotor yaw torque response in flies is part of a 3-dimensional system. Optomotor responses around the longitudinal and transversal body axes (roll and pitch) with strinkingly similar properties to the optomotor yaw response are described here forDrosophila melanogaster. Stimulated by visual motion from a striped drum rotating around an axis aligned with the measuring axis, a fly responds with torque of the same polarity as that of the rotation of the pattern. In this stimulus situation the optomotor responses for yaw, pitch and roll torque have about the same amplitudes and dynamic properties (Fig. 2). Pronounced negative responses are measured with periodic gratings of low pattern wavelengths due to geometrical interference (Fig. 3). The responses depend upon the contrast frequency rather than the angular velocity of the pattern (Fig. 4). Like the optomotor yaw response, roll and pitch responses can be elicited by small field motion in most parts of the visual field; only for motion below and behind the fly roll and pitch responses have low sensitivity.The mutantoptomotor-blind ^H31 (omb ^H31) in which the giant neurones of the lobula plate are missing or severely reduced, is impaired in all 3 optomotor torque responses (Fig. 5) whereas other visual responses like the optomotor lift/thrust response and the landing response (elicited by horizontal front-to-back motion) are not affected (Heisenberg et al. 1978).We propose that the lobula plate giant neurons mediate optomotor torque responses and that the VS-cells in particular are involved in roll and pitch but not in lift/thrust control. This hypothesis accommodates various electrophysiological and anatomical observations about these neurons in large flies.Abbreviation EMD elementary movement detector     

Effects of optokinetic stimulation on motor asymmetry in the goldfish

In goldfish fries, we examined the effect of the optomotor reaction (drive to swim toward moving images of vertical dark bars) on the behavioral motor asymmetry. Contralateral optokinetic stimulation of fishes (rotation of the bars against the direction preferred by fishes in their turnings) gradually smoothed and, later on, inverted the motor asymmetry, while the asymmetry underwent no modifications in the case of ipsilateral optokinetic stimulation (rotation of the bars in the direction similar to that preferred for turnings). Contralateral optokinetic stimulation also induced long-lasting inversion of the motor asymmetry of immobilized fishes deprived of the possibility to follow the movement of bar images. Ipsilateral optokinetic stimulation of fishes with the enucleation of the ipsilateral eye enhanced their motor asymmetry, while contralateral stimulation either did not modify the motor asymmetry of such individuals or inverted this feature. These data agree with the concept that, in fishes, one eye dominates and more actively provides tracking of the movement of bars, while another eye is a subdominant one. In general, we first found that the use of specific visual stimulation allows one to modify for a long time the behavioral motor asymmetry of the fishes, which, as is known, correlates with the morphofunctional asymmetry of Mauthner neurons (MNs). Visual information that activates MNs influences mostly the ventral dendrites of these neurons; thus, our findings allow us to believe that stimulations, which initiate the optomotor reaction, can serve as an adequate physiological model of natural visual stimulation of MNs (with projection of the respective influences on the ventral dendrites of the above cells). The use of such an experimental paradigm opens up new possibilities for studies of the role of these dendrites in the functions of MNs and of the plasticity of morphofunctional organization of these cells. Neirofiziologiya/Neurophysiology, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 133–145, March–April, 2007.     

Antennal mechanosensors mediate sex pheromone‐induced upwind orientation in the potato tuberworm moth

Males of the potato tuberworm moth Phthorimaea operculella (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) locate conspecific females by a series of short and straight flights, or ‘hops’. On the floor of a wind tunnel, P. operculella can change their heading angles in response to wind direction shift, suggesting that they detect wind direction and orient upwind when on the ground. It is unlikely that they navigate in wind by vision‐induced optomotor anemotaxis as in many flying moths. To investigate the mechanism of wind direction detection in this species, their orientation behaviour in response to pheromone pulses is observed in a wind tunnel. Intact male moths orient upwind even in complete darkness. After the flagellum of one antenna is amputated, male moths still successfully orient upwind. However, they fail to head upwind when the basal segments of both of their antennae are immobilized with glue. The ability to surge upwind is restored by removing the glue from the antennae. Thus, the results of the present study indicate that males of P. operculella orient upwind in response to mechanoreceptive cues from mechanosensory organs on their antennae. In Lepidoptera, two distinct anemotactic mechanisms of different sensory modalities appear to coexist: optomotor anemotaxis when airborne and the aim‐then‐shoot anemotactic system mediated by antennal mechanoreception when on the ground.     

Flight-phase and visual-field related optomotor yaw responses in gregarious desert locusts during tethered flight

Tethered flying desert locusts, Schistocerca gregaria, generate yaw-torque in response to rotation of a radial grating located beneath them. By screening parts of the pattern, rotation of the unscreened grating turned out to induce a compensatory steering (by pattern motion within transversally oriented 90° wide sectors) as well as an upwind/downwind turning response (by pattern motion within the anterior ventral 90° wide sector). The strength and polarity of responses upon the unscreened grating results from a linear superposition of these two response components. The results are discussed with regard to a functional specialization of eye regions.In a typical experiment, 3 consecutive flight-phases, assumed to mirror start, long-range flight, and landing of a free-flying locust, were distinguished. They may result from a time dependent variation of the polarity and relative strength of upwind/downwind turning and compensatory steering responses. Starting and landing phases were under strong optomotor control and were dominated by the high-gain compensatory steering. In contrast, the phase of long-range flight was under weak optomotor control resulting from a low gain in both of the two response components. The biological significance of this variable strength of optomotor control on free flight orientation of swarming locusts is discussed.     

The activity of pleurodorsal muscles during flight and at rest in the moth Manduca sexta (L.)

In the moth Manduca sexta, the paired mesothoracic flight steering muscle II PD2m takes part in the generation of the flight rhythm and is spontaneously active in the non-flying animal. This spontaneous activity is modulated by optomotor stimuli and directionally selective. The directional response characteristics are analyzed. Another spontaneously active steering muscle pair, the III PD2c, is situated in the metathorax. The activities of this pair and of a third muscle pair, the III PD3 are also influenced by visual stimulation.The responses of all 6 muscles to optomotor stimuli which simulate the flight situations yaw, roll, thrust and lift are analyzed. Each situation elicits a unique pattern of activation/deactivation within this set of muscles. The activity pattern in non-flying animals allows the prediction of flight steering mechanisms such as changes of wing area in flight turns and provides a useful basis for the analysis of visuo-motor pathways.     

Distinct Acute Zones for Visual Stimuli in Different Visual Tasks in Drosophila

The fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster has a sophisticated visual system and exhibits complex visual behaviors. Visual responses, vision processing and higher cognitive processes in Drosophila have been studied extensively. However, little is known about whether the retinal location of visual stimuli can affect fruit fly performance in various visual tasks. We tested the response of wild-type Berlin flies to visual stimuli at several vertical locations. Three paradigms were used in our study: visual operant conditioning, visual object fixation and optomotor response. We observed an acute zone for visual feature memorization in the upper visual field when visual patterns were presented with a black background. However, when a white background was used, the acute zone was in the lower visual field. Similar to visual feature memorization, the best locations for visual object fixation and optomotor response to a single moving stripe were in the lower visual field with a white background and the upper visual field with a black background. The preferred location for the optomotor response to moving gratings was around the equator of the visual field. Our results suggest that different visual processing pathways are involved in different visual tasks and that there is a certain degree of overlap between the pathways for visual feature memorization, visual object fixation and optomotor response.     

Motion sensitive interneurons in the optomotor system of the fly

The functional properties of the three horizontal cells (north horizontal cell, HSN; equatorial horizontal cell, HSE; south horizontal cell, HSS) in the lobula plate of the blowflyCalliphora erythrocephala were investigated electrophysiologically. 1. The receptive fields of the HSN, HSE, and HSS cover the dorsal, equatorial and ventral part of the ipsilateral visual field, respectively. In all three cells, the sensitivity to visual stimulation is highest in the frontal visual field and decreases laterally. The receptive fields and spatial sensitivity distributions of the horizontal cells are directly determined by the position and extension of their dendritic fields in the lobula plate and the dendritic density distributions within these fields. 2. The horizontal cells respond mainly to progressive (front to back) motion and are inhibited by motion in the reverse direction, the preferred and null direction being antiparallel. The amplitudes of motion induced excitatory and inhibitory responses decline like a cosine function with increasing deviation of the direction of motion from the preferred direction. Stimulation with motion in directions perpendicular to the preferred direction is ineffective. 3. The preferred directions of the horizontal cells show characteristic gradual orientation changes in different parts of the receptive fields: they are horizontally oriented only in the equatorial region and increasingly tilted vertically towards the dorsofrontal and ventrofrontal margins of the visual field. These orientation changes can be correlated with equivalent changes in the local orientation of the lattice of ommatidial axes in the pertinent compound eye. 4. The response amplitudes of the horizontal cells under stimulation with a moving periodic grating depend strongly on the contrast frequency of the stimulus. Maximal responses were found at contrast frequencies of 2–5 Hz. 5. The spatial integration properties of the horizontal cells (studied in the HSE) are highly nonlinear. Under stimulation with extended moving patterns, their response amplitudes are nearly independent of the size of the stimuli. It is demonstrated that this response behaviour does not result from postsynaptic saturation in the dendrites of the cells. The results indicate that the horizontal system is essentially involved in the neural control of optomotor torque responses performed by the fly in order to minimize unvoluntary deviations from a straight flight course.     

Neural correlates of the optomotor response in the fly

Summary Studies of the optomotor response, the tendency to turn in response to a moving pattern, have yielded some understanding of the motion detection capabilities of the fly. We present data from extracellular microelectrode recordings from the optic lobes of the housefly, Musca domestica and the blowflies Eucalliphora lilaea and Calliphora phaenicia. Directionally selective and directionally nonselective motion sensitive units were observed in the region between the medulla and the lobula of all three species. Employing similar stimulus conditions to those used in the optomotor reaction studies, it was found that the response of the directionally selective units exhibited most of the characteristics of the optomotor response torque measurements. It is concluded that these units code the information prerequisite to the optomotor response and hence, that much data processing is achieved in the first few synaptic layers of the insect visual nervous system.     

Evidence for the role of retinal receptors R 7/8 in the orientation behaviour of the fly

The height orientation of flying houseflies Musca domestica has been analyzed:

1. The luminance threshold of the orientation behaviour has been determined. It corresponds to the luminance threshold needed for the optomotor response in the torque released by the receptors R 7/8 (Eckert, 1973).
2. The direction of the E-vector of the linearly polarized stimulating light has been varied at a luminance just above threshold. It was found that the ability of the fly to fixate is dependent upon this parameter.
3. The rhabdomeres R 1–6 and/or 7/8 have been stimulated selectively and the threshold of the height orientation response has been measured under the different conditions of stimulation. It has been found that the threshold of luminance, when all receptors are stimulated, is almost identical to the threshold when only the receptors R 7/8 are stimulated. If the receptors R 1–6 are stimulated specifically the response threshold is rised by 1 to 2 decades of illuminance, as compared to the specific stimulation of R 7/8.

It is concluded that the results of all experiments are in accordance with the hypothesis, that the receptors R 7/8 are necessary for the orientation behaviour.     

Sensitivity of the Goldfish Motion Detection System Revealed by Incoherent Random Dot Stimuli: Comparison of Behavioural and Neuronal Data

Background

Global motion detection is one of the most important abilities in the animal kingdom to navigate through a 3-dimensional environment. In the visual system of teleost fish direction-selective neurons in the pretectal area (APT) are most important for global motion detection. As in all other vertebrates these neurons are involved in the control of slow phase eye movements during gaze stabilization. In contrast to mammals cortical pathways that might influence motion detection abilities of the optokinetic system are missing in teleost fish.

Results

To test global motion detection in goldfish we first measured the coherence threshold of random dot patterns to elicit horizontal slow phase eye movements. In addition, the coherence threshold of the optomotor response was determined by the same random dot patterns. In a second approach the coherence threshold to elicit a direction selective response in neurons of the APT was assessed from a neurometric function. Behavioural thresholds and neuronal thresholds to elicit slow phase eye movements were very similar, and ranged between 10% and 20% coherence. In contrast to these low thresholds for the optokinetic reaction and APT neurons the optomotor response could only be elicited by random dot patterns with coherences above 40%.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest a high sensitivity for global motion in the goldfish optokinetic system. Comparison of neuronal and behavioural thresholds implies a nearly one-to-one transformation of visual neuron performance to the visuo-motor output. In addition, we assume that the optomotor response is not mediated by the optokinetic system, but instead by other motion detection systems with higher coherence thresholds.     

Optomotor control of wing beat and body posture in drosophila

Continuous movement of striped patterns was presented on either side of a tethered fruitfly, Drosophila melanogaster, in order to simulate the displacement of stationary landmarks within the visual field of the freely moving fly. The horizontal components of the stimulus elicit, predominantly, yaw-torque responses during flight, or turning responses on the ground, which counteract involuntary deviations from a streight course in the corresponding mode of locomotion. The vertical components elicit, predominantly, covariant responses of lift and thrust which enable the fly to maintain a given level of flight. Monocular stimulation is sufficient to produce antagonistic responses, if the direction of the stimulus is reversed. The following constituents of the responses were derived mainly from properties of wing beat and body posture on photographs of fixed flight under visual stimulation. Wing stroke modulation (W. S. M.): The difference, and the sum, of the stroke amplitudes on either side are independently controlled by horizontal and vertical movement components, respectively. The maximum range of modulation per wing (12.3°) is equivalent to a 63% change in thrust on the corresponding side. Leg stroke modulation (L.S.M.): In the walking fly each pair of legs is under control of visual stimulation. The details of leg articulation are still unknown. Abdominal deflection (A.D.): An actively induced posture effect. Facilitates steering during free flight at increased air speed. Hind leg deflection (H.L.D.): Same as before. On most of the photographs the hind legs were deflected simultaneously and in the same direction as the abdomen. Hitch inhibition (H.I.): The term hitch denotes a transient reduction of stroke amplitude which seems to occur spontaneously and independently on either side of the fly. The hitch angle (12.2±3.8° S.D.) is most probably invariant to visual stimulation. Hitches are comparatively frequent in the absence of pattern movement. Their inhibition under visual stimulation is equivalent to an increase of the average thrust of the corresponding wing. The different constituents contribute to the optomotor responses according to the following tentative scheme (Fig. 7). The torque response is essentially due to the effects of W.S.M., A.D., H.L.D. and H.I., and the turning response to L.S.M. and possibly H.L.D., if the landmarks drift from anterior to posterior. So far, H.I. seems to be the only source of the torque response, and L.S.M. the only source of the turning response, if the landmarks drift in the opposite direction. The lift/thrust response results essentially from the effects of W.S.M. and H.I., no matter whether the landmarks drift from inferior to superior or in the opposite direction. The results obtained so far suggest that the optomotor control of course and altitude in Drosophila requires at least eight independent input channels or equivalent means for the separation of the descending signals from the visual centres. Further extension and refinement of the wiring scheme is required in order to improve the identification of the sensory inputs of the motor system and the classification of optomotor defective mutants.     

Aim‐then‐shoot anemotaxis involved in the hopping approach of potato tuberworm moth Phthorimaea operculella toward a sex pheromone source

Male moths locate conspecific females by pheromone‐induced upwind flight maintained by detecting a visual flow, termed optomotor anemotaxis. Their behavioural pattern is characterized by an upwind surge in response to a pheromone stimulus and crosswind casting after odour loss, which is considered to be reset and restarted on receipt of another pheromone pulse. However, pheromone‐stimulated males of the potato tuberworm moth Phthorimaea operculella exhibit a series of short and straight intermittent flights, or hops, when moving upwind. It is unclear whether they navigate by employing the same behavioural pattern and wind detection mechanism as that used by flying moths. To analyze odour‐modulated anemotaxis in male potato tuberworm moths, a flat wind tunnel is constructed to give regular odour stimuli to an insect regardless of its location. Moths are subjected to pheromone pulses of different frequencies to test whether they show a behavioural pattern that is reset and restarted by a pheromone pulse. Moths on the ground are also subjected to crosswind shear to examine their detection of wind direction. Path analyses reveal that males surge upwind when they receive a pheromone pulse and exhibit casting by successive hops when they lose odour. This behavioural pattern appears to be similar to that of flying moths. When the direction of the airflow is switched orthogonally, males adjust their course angle accordingly when they are on the ground. It is suggested that, instead of optomotor anemotaxis, this ‘aim‐then‐shoot’ system aids the detection of wind direction, possibly by mechanosensory means.