OPM: orientations of proteins in membranes database

SUMMARY: The Orientations of Proteins in Membranes (OPM) database provides a collection of transmembrane, monotopic and peripheral proteins from the Protein Data Bank whose spatial arrangements in the lipid bilayer have been calculated theoretically and compared with experimental data. The database allows analysis, sorting and searching of membrane proteins based on their structural classification, species, destination membrane, numbers of transmembrane segments and subunits, numbers of secondary structures and the calculated hydrophobic thickness or tilt angle with respect to the bilayer normal. All coordinate files with the calculated membrane boundaries are available for downloading. AVAILABILITY: http://opm.phar.umich.edu.     

Transmembrane helices of membrane proteins may flex to satisfy hydrophobic mismatch

A novel mechanism for membrane modulation of transmembrane protein structure, and consequently function, is suggested in which mismatch between the hydrophobic surface of the protein and the hydrophobic interior of the lipid bilayer induces a flexing or bending of a transmembrane segment of the protein. Studies on model hydrophobic transmembrane peptides predict that helices tilt to submerge the hydrophobic surface within the lipid bilayer to satisfy the hydrophobic effect if the helix length exceeds the bilayer width. The hydrophobic surface of transmembrane helix 1 (TM1) of lactose permease, LacY, is accessible to the bilayer, and too long to be accommodated in the hydrophobic portion of a typical lipid bilayer if oriented perpendicular to the membrane surface. Hence, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) data and molecular dynamics simulations show that TM1 from LacY may flex as well as tilt to satisfy the hydrophobic mismatch with the bilayer. In an analogous study of the hydrophobic mismatch of TM7 of bovine rhodopsin, similar flexing of the transmembrane segment near the conserved NPxxY sequence is observed. As a control, NMR data on TM5 of lacY, which is much shorter than TM1, show that TM5 is likely to tilt, but not flex, consistent with the close match between the extent of hydrophobic surface of the peptide and the hydrophobic thickness of the bilayer. These data suggest mechanisms by which the lipid bilayer in which the protein is embedded modulates conformation, and thus function, of integral membrane proteins through interactions with the hydrophobic transmembrane helices.     

Orientation and dynamics of transmembrane peptides: the power of simple models

In this review we discuss recent insights obtained from well-characterized model systems into the factors that determine the orientation and tilt angles of transmembrane peptides in lipid bilayers. We will compare tilt angles of synthetic peptides with those of natural peptides and proteins, and we will discuss how tilt can be modulated by hydrophobic mismatch between the thickness of the bilayer and the length of the membrane spanning part of the peptide or protein. In particular, we will focus on results obtained on tryptophan-flanked model peptides (WALP peptides) as a case study to illustrate possible consequences of hydrophobic mismatch in molecular detail and to highlight the importance of peptide dynamics for the experimental determination of tilt angles. We will conclude with discussing some future prospects and challenges concerning the use of simple peptide/lipid model systems as a tool to understand membrane structure and function.     

The membrane environment modulates self-association of the human GpA TM domain—Implications for membrane protein folding and transmembrane signaling

The influence of lipid bilayer properties on a defined and sequence-specific transmembrane helix-helix interaction is not well characterized yet. To study the potential impact of changing bilayer properties on a sequence-specific transmembrane helix-helix interaction, we have traced the association of fluorescent-labeled glycophorin A transmembrane peptides by fluorescence spectroscopy in model membranes with varying lipid compositions. The observed changes of the glycophorin A dimerization propensities in different lipid bilayers suggest that the lipid bilayer thickness severely influences the monomer-dimer equilibrium of this transmembrane domain, and dimerization was most efficient under hydrophobic matching conditions. Moreover, cholesterol considerably promotes self-association of transmembrane helices in model membranes by affecting the lipid acyl chain ordering. In general, the order of the lipid acyl chains appears to be an important factor involved in determining the strength and stability of transmembrane helix-helix interactions. As discussed, the described influences of membrane properties on transmembrane helix-helix interactions are highly important for understanding the mechanism of transmembrane protein folding and functioning as well as for gaining a deeper insight into the regulation of signal transduction via membrane integral proteins by bilayer properties.     

Lateral redistribution of transmembrane proteins and liquid-ordered domains in lipid membranes with inhomogeneous curvature

A number of processes in living cells are accompanied by significant changes of the geometric curvature of lipid membranes. In turn, heterogeneity of the lateral curvature can lead to spatial redistribution of membrane components, most important of which are transmembrane proteins and liquid-ordered lipid-protein domains. These components have a so-called hydrophobic mismatch: the length of the transmembrane domain of the protein, or the thickness of the bilayer of the domain differ from the thickness of the surrounding membrane. In this work we consider redistribution of membrane components with hydrophobic mismatch in membranes with non-uniform geometric curvature. Dependence of the components’ energy on the curvature is calculated in terms of theory of elasticity of liquid crystals adapted to lipid membranes. According to the calculations, transmembrane proteins prefer regions of the membrane with zero curvature. Liquid-ordered domains having a size of a few nm distribute mainly into regions of the membrane with small negative curvature appearing in the cell plasma membrane in the process of endocytosis. The distribution of domains of a large radius is determined by a decrease of their perimeter upon bending; these domains distribute into membrane regions with relatively large curvature.     

How protein transmembrane segments sense the lipid environment

Integral membrane proteins have central roles in a vast number of vital cellular processes. A structural feature that most membrane proteins have in common is the presence of one or more alpha-helices with which they traverse the lipid bilayer. Because of the interaction with the surrounding lipids, the organization of these transmembrane helices will be sensitive to lipid properties like lateral packing, hydrophobic thickness, and headgroup charge. The helices may adapt to the lipids in different ways, which in turn can influence the structure and function of the intact membrane protein. In this review, we will focus on how the lipid environment influences two specific properties of transmembrane segments: their lateral association and their tilt with respect to the bilayer normal.     

Measurement of thermodynamic parameters for hydrophobic mismatch 2: intermembrane transfer of a transmembrane helix

Hydrophobic matching between proteins and lipids is essential for the thermodynamic stability of integral membrane proteins. However, there is no direct thermodynamic information available about the intermembrane transfer of proteins between membranes with different hydrophobic thicknesses, which is crucial for understanding hydrophobic mismatch. This article reports the complete set of thermodynamic parameters (DeltaG, DeltaH, DeltaS, and DeltaC(p)) for the intermembrane transfer of the inert hydrophobic model transmembrane helix NBD-(AALALAA)(3)-NH(2) (NBD: 7-nitro-2-1,3-benzoxadiazol-4-yl), which is exchangeable between vesicles, from 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (POPC) to dimonounsaturated-phosphocholine lipid bilayers with different hydrophobic thicknesses (C14-C22) at 37-58 degrees C. The transfer free energies were calculated from equilibrium values of the extent of helix transfer from donor to acceptor lipid vesicles, as monitored by a decrease in fluorescence resonance energy transfer from the NBD group to a lipid-labeled Rhodamine in the donor upon transfer to the quencher-free acceptor. Under hydrophobic mismatch conditions up to approximately 7 A, the helix partitioning became unfavorable up to +7 kJ mol(-)(1), hampered by an increase in entropic (up to +20 kJ mol(-)(1)) and enthalpic (up to +66 kJ mol(-)(1)) terms in thinner and thicker membranes, respectively. Together with the results that H/D exchange at the membrane interface was accelerated in thinner membranes the obtained thermodynamic parameters were reasonably explained assuming that hydrophobic mismatch induces aqueous exposure or membrane burial of the helix termini, resulting in excess energies originating from the hydration of terminal hydrophobic residues or the unfavorable Born energy of terminal partial charges of the helix macrodipole.     

Orientational preferences of neighboring helices can drive ER insertion of a marginally hydrophobic transmembrane helix

α-helical integral membrane proteins critically depend on the correct insertion of their transmembrane α helices into the lipid bilayer for proper folding, yet a surprisingly large fraction of the transmembrane α helices in multispanning integral membrane proteins are not sufficiently hydrophobic to insert into the target membrane by themselves. How can such marginally hydrophobic segments nevertheless form transmembrane helices in the folded structure? Here, we show that a transmembrane helix with a strong orientational preference (N(cyt)-C(lum) or N(lum)-C(cyt)) can both increase and decrease the hydrophobicity threshold for membrane insertion of a neighboring, marginally hydrophobic helix. This effect helps explain the "missing hydrophobicity" in polytopic membrane proteins.     

Revisiting Hydrophobic Mismatch with Free Energy Simulation Studies of Transmembrane Helix Tilt and Rotation

Protein-lipid interaction and bilayer regulation of membrane protein functions are largely controlled by the hydrophobic match between the transmembrane (TM) domain of membrane proteins and the surrounding lipid bilayer. To systematically characterize responses of a TM helix and lipid adaptations to a hydrophobic mismatch, we have performed a total of 5.8-μs umbrella sampling simulations and calculated the potentials of mean force (PMFs) as a function of TM helix tilt angle under various mismatch conditions. Single-pass TM peptides called WALPn (n = 16, 19, 23, and 27) were used in two lipid bilayers with different hydrophobic thicknesses to consider hydrophobic mismatch caused by either the TM length or the bilayer thickness. In addition, different flanking residues, such as alanine, lysine, and arginine, instead of tryptophan in WALP23 were used to examine their influence. The PMFs, their decomposition, and trajectory analysis demonstrate that 1), tilting of a single-pass TM helix is the major response to a hydrophobic mismatch; 2), TM helix tilting up to ∼10° is inherent due to the intrinsic entropic contribution arising from helix precession around the membrane normal even under a negative mismatch; 3), the favorable helix-lipid interaction provides additional driving forces for TM helix tilting under a positive mismatch; 4), the minimum-PMF tilt angle is generally located where there is the hydrophobic match and little lipid perturbation; 5), TM helix rotation is dependent on the specific helix-lipid interaction; and 6), anchoring residues at the hydrophilic/hydrophobic interface can be an important determinant of TM helix orientation.     

Transmembrane helices of membrane proteins may flex to satisfy hydrophobic mismatch

A novel mechanism for membrane modulation of transmembrane protein structure, and consequently function, is suggested in which mismatch between the hydrophobic surface of the protein and the hydrophobic interior of the lipid bilayer induces a flexing or bending of a transmembrane segment of the protein. Studies on model hydrophobic transmembrane peptides predict that helices tilt to submerge the hydrophobic surface within the lipid bilayer to satisfy the hydrophobic effect if the helix length exceeds the bilayer width. The hydrophobic surface of transmembrane helix 1 (TM1) of lactose permease, LacY, is accessible to the bilayer, and too long to be accommodated in the hydrophobic portion of a typical lipid bilayer if oriented perpendicular to the membrane surface. Hence, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) data and molecular dynamics simulations show that TM1 from LacY may flex as well as tilt to satisfy the hydrophobic mismatch with the bilayer. In an analogous study of the hydrophobic mismatch of TM7 of bovine rhodopsin, similar flexing of the transmembrane segment near the conserved NPxxY sequence is observed. As a control, NMR data on TM5 of lacY, which is much shorter than TM1, show that TM5 is likely to tilt, but not flex, consistent with the close match between the extent of hydrophobic surface of the peptide and the hydrophobic thickness of the bilayer. These data suggest mechanisms by which the lipid bilayer in which the protein is embedded modulates conformation, and thus function, of integral membrane proteins through interactions with the hydrophobic transmembrane helices.     

Protein modulation of lipids, and vice-versa, in membranes

This review describes: (i) perturbations of the membrane lipids that are induced by integral membrane proteins, and reciprocally, (ii) the effects that the lipids may have on the function of membrane-associated proteins. Topics of the first category that are covered include: stoichiometry and selectivity of the first shell of lipids associated at the intramembranous perimeter of transmembrane proteins; the chain configuration and exchange rates of the first-shell lipids; the effects of transmembrane peptides on transbilayer movement of lipids (flip-flop); the effects of membrane proteins on lipid polymorphism and formation of non-lamellar phases; and the effects of hydrophobic mismatch on lipid chain configuration, phase stability and selectivity of lipid-protein association. Topics of the second category are: the influence of lipid selectivity on conformational changes in the protein; the effects of elastic fluctuations of the lipid bilayer on protein insertion and orientation in membranes; the effects of hydrophobic matching on intramembrane protein-protein association; and the effects of intrinsic lipid curvature on membrane integration, oligomer formation and activity of membrane proteins.     

Lipid-protein interactions in biological membranes: a structural perspective

Lipid molecules bound to membrane proteins are resolved in some high-resolution structures of membrane proteins. An analysis of these structures provides a framework within which to analyse the nature of lipid-protein interactions within membranes. Membrane proteins are surrounded by a shell or annulus of lipid molecules, equivalent to the solvent layer surrounding a water-soluble protein. The lipid bilayer extends right up to the membrane protein, with a uniform thickness around the protein. The surface of a membrane protein contains many shallow grooves and protrusions to which the fatty acyl chains of the surrounding lipids conform to provide tight packing into the membrane. An individual lipid molecule will remain in the annular shell around a protein for only a short period of time. Binding to the annular shell shows relatively little structural specificity. As well as the annular lipid, there is evidence for other lipid molecules bound between the transmembrane alpha-helices of the protein; these lipids are referred to as non-annular lipids. The average thickness of the hydrophobic domain of a membrane protein is about 29 A, with a few proteins having significantly smaller or greater thicknesses than the average. Hydrophobic mismatch between a membrane protein and the surrounding lipid bilayer generally leads to only small changes in membrane thickness. Possible adaptations in the protein to minimise mismatch include tilting of the helices and rotation of side chains at the ends of the helices. Packing of transmembrane alpha-helices is dependent on the chain length of the surrounding phospholipids. The function of membrane proteins is dependent on the thickness of the surrounding lipid bilayer, sometimes on the presence of specific, usually anionic, phospholipids, and sometimes on the phase of the phospholipid.     

Biophysical investigations of membrane perturbations by polypeptides using solid-state NMR spectroscopy (review)

Polypeptides have been prepared by solid-phase peptide synthesis and labelled with 15N at single sites to be used for static or magic angle spinning solid-state NMR spectroscopy. After reconstitution into oriented membranes, the alignment of polypeptide alpha-helices with respect to the bilayer surface is accessible by proton-decoupled 15N solid-state NMR spectroscopy. In addition, limiting values of rotational diffusion coefficients are obtained. The effects of membrane inserted peptides on the bilayer phospholipids have been investigated by 2H and 31P solid-state NMR spectroscopy. Long hydrophobic peptides such as the channel-forming domains of Vpu of HIV-1 or M2 of influenza A adopt stable alignments approximately parallel to the bilayer normal in agreement with models suggesting transmembrane helical bundle formation. The 15N chemical shift data agree with tilt angles of approximately 20 degrees and 33 degrees, respectively. In contrast, multi-charged amphipathic alpha-helices adopt stable orientations parallel to the bilayer surface. In the presence of these peptides, decreased order parameters of the fatty acyl chains, membrane thinning, and the loss of long-range order are observed. Peptides that change topology in a pH dependent manner are more potent in antibiotic assays under experimental conditions where they show in-plane alignments. This result suggests that their detergent-like properties, rather than the formation of transmembrane helical bundles, are responsible for their cell-killing activities. Topological equilibria are also observed within proteins or for polypeptides that do not match the hydrophobic thickness of the bilayer.     

Energetics of hydrophobic matching in lipid-protein interactions

Lipid chain length modulates the activity of transmembrane proteins by mismatch between the hydrophobic span of the protein and that of the lipid membrane. Relative binding affinities of lipids with different chain lengths are used to estimate the excess free energy of lipid-protein interaction that arises from hydrophobic mismatch. For a wide range of integral proteins and peptides, the energy cost is much less than the elastic penalty of fully stretching or compressing the lipid chains to achieve complete hydrophobic matching. The chain length dependences of the free energies of lipid association are described by a model that combines elastic chain extension with a free energy term that depends linearly on the extent of residual mismatch. The excess free energy densities involved lie in the region of 0.5-2.0 k_BT.nm⁻². Values of this size could arise from exposure of hydrophobic groups to polar portions of the lipid or protein, but not directly to water, or alternatively from changes in tilt of the transmembrane helices that are energetically comparable to those activating mechanosensitive channels. The influence of hydrophobic mismatch on dimerization of transmembrane helices and their transfer between lipid vesicles, and on shifts in chain-melting transitions of lipid bilayers by incorporated proteins, is analyzed by using the same thermodynamic model. Segmental order parameters confirm that elastic lipid chain distortions are insufficient to compensate fully for the mismatch, but the dependence on chain length with tryptophan-anchored peptides requires that the free energy density of hydrophobic mismatch should increase with increasing extent of mismatch.     

Membrane protein insertase YidC in bacteria and archaea

The insertion of proteins into the prokaryotic plasma membrane is catalyzed by translocases and insertases. On one hand, the Sec translocase operates as a transmembrane channel that can open laterally to first bind and then release the hydrophobic segments of a substrate protein into the lipid bilayer. On the other hand, YidC insertases interact with their substrates in a groove‐like structure at an amphiphilic protein–lipid interface thus allowing the transmembrane segments of the substrate to slide into the lipid bilayer. The recently published high‐resolution structures of YidC provide new mechanistic insights of how transmembrane proteins achieve the transition from an aqueous environment in the cytoplasm to the hydrophobic lipid bilayer environment of the membrane.     

Identification of transmembrane tryptic peptides of rhodopsin using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry.

The application of mass spectrometry for determining the topography of integral membrane proteins has focused primarily on the mass determination of fragments that do not reside in the lipid bilayer. In this work, we present the accurate mass determination of transmembrane tryptic peptides of bovine rhodopsin using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. The ability to determine the accurate mass of hydrophobic transmembrane peptides will facilitate the mapping of ligand binding sites in membrane receptors. It will also augment the determination of membrane spanning regions from integral membrane proteins digested in lipid bilayers. Affinity-purified rhodopsin in detergent and rhodopsin in retinal rod membranes were digested with trypsin. Tryptic peptides were separated using reverse-phase, high-performance liquid chromatography at 55 degrees C with the detergent octyl-beta-glucoside in the mobile phase. Four of the six transmembrane tryptic peptides of rhodopsin were identified, ranging in mass from 3,260 Da to 6,528 Da. The identities of the peptides were confirmed by Edman microsequencing. In addition, heterogeneity in the glycosylation of the N-terminal tryptic peptide of rhodopsin was identified by MALDI MS, without modifying the carbohydrate prior to analysis.     

Lipid-protein interactions in biological membranes: a structural perspective

Lipid molecules bound to membrane proteins are resolved in some high-resolution structures of membrane proteins. An analysis of these structures provides a framework within which to analyse the nature of lipid-protein interactions within membranes. Membrane proteins are surrounded by a shell or annulus of lipid molecules, equivalent to the solvent layer surrounding a water-soluble protein. The lipid bilayer extends right up to the membrane protein, with a uniform thickness around the protein. The surface of a membrane protein contains many shallow grooves and protrusions to which the fatty acyl chains of the surrounding lipids conform to provide tight packing into the membrane. An individual lipid molecule will remain in the annular shell around a protein for only a short period of time. Binding to the annular shell shows relatively little structural specificity. As well as the annular lipid, there is evidence for other lipid molecules bound between the transmembrane α-helices of the protein; these lipids are referred to as non-annular lipids. The average thickness of the hydrophobic domain of a membrane protein is about 29 Å, with a few proteins having significantly smaller or greater thicknesses than the average. Hydrophobic mismatch between a membrane protein and the surrounding lipid bilayer generally leads to only small changes in membrane thickness. Possible adaptations in the protein to minimise mismatch include tilting of the helices and rotation of side chains at the ends of the helices. Packing of transmembrane α-helices is dependent on the chain length of the surrounding phospholipids. The function of membrane proteins is dependent on the thickness of the surrounding lipid bilayer, sometimes on the presence of specific, usually anionic, phospholipids, and sometimes on the phase of the phospholipid.     

Life at the border: Adaptation of proteins to anisotropic membrane environment

This review discusses main features of transmembrane (TM) proteins which distinguish them from water‐soluble proteins and allow their adaptation to the anisotropic membrane environment. We overview the structural limitations on membrane protein architecture, spatial arrangement of proteins in membranes and their intrinsic hydrophobic thickness, co‐translational and post‐translational folding and insertion into lipid bilayers, topogenesis, high propensity to form oligomers, and large‐scale conformational transitions during membrane insertion and transport function. Special attention is paid to the polarity of TM protein surfaces described by profiles of dipolarity/polarizability and hydrogen‐bonding capacity parameters that match polarity of the lipid environment. Analysis of distributions of Trp resides on surfaces of TM proteins from different biological membranes indicates that interfacial membrane regions with preferential accumulation of Trp indole rings correspond to the outer part of the lipid acyl chain region—between double bonds and carbonyl groups of lipids. These “midpolar” regions are not always symmetric in proteins from natural membranes. We also examined the hydrophobic effect that drives insertion of proteins into lipid bilayer and different free energy contributions to TM protein stability, including attractive van der Waals forces and hydrogen bonds, side‐chain conformational entropy, the hydrophobic mismatch, membrane deformations, and specific protein–lipid binding.