Lipids at membrane contact sites: cell signaling and ion transport

Communication between organelles is essential to coordinate cellular functions and the cell's response to physiological and pathological stimuli. Organellar communication occurs at membrane contact sites (MCSs), where the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane is tethered to cellular organelle membranes by specific tether proteins and where lipid transfer proteins and cell signaling proteins are located. MCSs have many cellular functions and are the sites of lipid and ion transfer between organelles and generation of second messengers. This review discusses several aspects of MCSs in the context of lipid transfer, formation of lipid domains, generation of Ca²⁺ and cAMP second messengers, and regulation of ion transporters by lipids.     

Lipid transfer and signaling at organelle contact sites: the tip of the iceberg

Membrane contact sites (MCSs) are formed by the close apposition of membranes of two organelles. They are zones where signals and small molecules, such as lipids and calcium, are exchanged between intracellular compartments. The past few years have seen considerable progress in our understanding of how MCSs form and facilitate the exchange of lipids and signals. Here we summarize what has been learned about MCSs between the endoplamic reticulum (ER) and the plasma membrane, the ER and mitochondria, and the ER and endosomes or lysosomes. These findings suggest that we are just beginning to understand how MCSs form and function.     

Maintaining social contacts: The physiological relevance of organelle interactions

Membrane-bound organelles in eukaryotic cells form an interactive network to coordinate and facilitate cellular functions. The formation of close contacts, termed “membrane contact sites” (MCSs), represents an intriguing strategy for organelle interaction and coordinated interplay. Emerging research is rapidly revealing new details of MCSs. They represent ubiquitous and diverse structures, which are important for many aspects of cell physiology and homeostasis. Here, we provide a comprehensive overview of the physiological relevance of organelle contacts. We focus on mitochondria, peroxisomes, the Golgi complex and the plasma membrane, and discuss the most recent findings on their interactions with other subcellular organelles and their multiple functions, including membrane contacts with the ER, lipid droplets and the endosomal/lysosomal compartment.     

Pex30-like proteins function as adaptors at distinct ER membrane contact sites

Membrane lipids and proteins synthesized in the ER are used for de novo assembly of organelles, such as lipid droplets and peroxisomes. After assembly, the growth of these organelles is supported by ER-derived lipids transferred at membrane contact sites (MCSs). How ER sites for organelle biogenesis and lipid transfer are established and regulated is unclear. Here, we investigate how the ER membrane protein Pex30 and its family members Pex28, Pex29, Pex31, and Pex32 target and function at multiple MCSs. We show that different Pex30 complexes function at distinct ER domains and MCSs. Pex30 targets ER–peroxisome MCSs when bound to Pex28 and Pex32, organizes the nuclear–vacuolar junction when bound to Pex29, and promotes the biogenesis of lipid droplets independently of other family members. Importantly, the reticulon homology domain (RHD) mediates the assembly of the various Pex30 complexes. Given the role of RHD in membrane shaping, our findings offer a mechanistic link between MCS and regulation of membrane curvature.     

Short-range intracellular trafficking of small molecules across endoplasmic reticulum junctions

Intracellular trafficking is not mediated exclusively by vesicles. Additional, non-vesicular mechanisms transport material, in particular small molecules such as lipids and Ca(2+) ions, from one organelle to another. This transport occurs at narrow cytoplasmic gaps called membrane contact sites (MCSs), at which two organelles come into close apposition. Despite the conservation of these structures throughout evolution, little is known about this transport, largely because of a lack of knowledge of almost all molecular components of MCSs. Recently, this situation has started to change because the structural proteins that bridge an MCS are now known in a single case, and proteins implicated in lipid trafficking have been localized to MCSs. In the light of these advances, I hypothesize that the endoplasmic reticulum has a central role in the trafficking of lipids and ions by forming a network of MCSs with most other intracellular organelles.     

Ultrastructural relationship of the phagophore with surrounding organelles

Phagophore nucleates from a subdomain of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) termed the omegasome and also makes contact with other organelles such as mitochondria, Golgi complex, plasma membrane and recycling endosomes during its formation. We have used serial block face scanning electron microscopy (SB-EM) and electron tomography (ET) to image phagophore biogenesis in 3 dimensions and to determine the relationship between the phagophore and surrounding organelles at high resolution. ET was performed to confirm whether membrane contact sites (MCSs) are evident between the phagophore and those surrounding organelles. In addition to the known contacts with the ER, we identified MCSs between the phagophore and membranes from putative ER exit sites, late endosomes or lysosomes, the Golgi complex and mitochondria. We also show that one phagophore can have simultaneous MCSs with more than one organelle. Future membrane flux experiments are needed to determine whether membrane contacts also signify lipid translocation.     

Interorganellar communication and membrane contact sites in protozoan parasites

A key characteristic of eukaryotic cells is the presence of organelles with discrete boundaries and functions. Such subcellular compartmentalization into organelles necessitates platforms for communication and material exchange between each other which often involves vesicular trafficking and associated processes. Another way is via the close apposition between organellar membranes, called membrane contact sites (MCSs). Apart from lipid transfer, MCSs have been implicated to mediate in various cellular processes including ion transport, apoptosis, and organelle dynamics. In mammalian and yeast cells, contact sites have been reported between the membranes of the following: the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and the plasma membrane (PM), ER and the Golgi apparatus, ER and endosomes (i.e., vacuoles, lysosomes), ER and lipid droplets (LD), the mitochondria and vacuoles, the nucleus and vacuoles, and the mitochondria and lipid droplets, whereas knowledge of MCSs in non-model organisms such as protozoan parasites is extremely limited. Growing evidence suggests that MCSs play more general and conserved roles in cell physiology. In this mini review, we summarize and discuss representative MCSs in divergent parasitic protozoa, and highlight the universality, diversity, and the contribution of MCSs to parasitism.     

Piecing together the structural organisation of lipid exchange at membrane contact sites

Membrane contact sites (MCSs) are areas of close proximity between organelles, implicated in transport of small molecules and in organelle biogenesis. Lipid transfer proteins at MCSs facilitate the distribution of lipid species between organelle membranes. Such exchange processes rely on the apposition of two different membranes delimiting distinct compartments and a cytosolic intermembrane space. Maintaining organelle identity while transferring molecules therefore implies control over MCS architecture both on the ultrastructural and molecular levels. Factors including intermembrane distance, density of resident proteins, and contact surface area fine-tune MCS function. Furthermore, the structural arrangement of lipid transfer proteins and associated proteins underpins the molecular mechanisms of lipid fluxes at MCSs. Thus, the architecture of MCSs emerges as an essential aspect of their function.     

DeepContact: High-throughput quantification of membrane contact sites based on electron microscopy imaging

Membrane contact site (MCS)-mediated organelle interactions play essential roles in the cell. Quantitative analysis of MCSs reveals vital clues for cellular responses under various physiological and pathological conditions. However, an efficient tool is lacking. Here, we developed DeepContact, a deep-learning protocol for optimizing organelle segmentation and contact analysis based on label-free EM. DeepContact presents high efficiency and flexibility in interactive visualizations, accommodating new morphologies of organelles and recognizing contacts in versatile width ranges, which enables statistical analysis of various types of MCSs in multiple systems. DeepContact profiled previously unidentified coordinative rearrangements of MCS types in cultured cells with combined nutritional conditions. DeepContact also unveiled a subtle wave of ER–mitochondrial entanglement in Sertoli cells during the seminiferous epithelial cycle, indicating its potential in bridging MCS dynamics to physiological and pathological processes.     

Routes and mechanisms of post‐endosomal cholesterol trafficking: A story that never ends

Mammalian cells acquire most exogenous cholesterol through receptor‐mediated endocytosis of low‐density lipoproteins (LDLs). After internalization, LDL cholesteryl esters are hydrolyzed to release free cholesterol, which then translocates to late endosomes (LEs)/lysosomes (LYs) and incorporates into the membranes by co‐ordinated actions of Niemann‐Pick type C (NPC) 1 and NPC2 proteins. However, how cholesterol exits LEs/LYs and moves to other organelles remain largely unclear. Growing evidence has suggested that nonvesicular transport is critically involved in the post‐endosomal cholesterol trafficking. Numerous sterol‐transfer proteins (STPs) have been identified to mediate directional cholesterol transfer at membrane contact sites (MCSs) formed between 2 closely apposed organelles. In addition, a recent study reveals that lysosome‐peroxisome membrane contact (LPMC) established by a non‐STP synaptotagmin VII and a specific phospholipid phosphatidylinositol 4,5‐bisphosphate also serves as a novel and important path for LDL‐cholesterol trafficking. These findings highlight an essential role of MCSs in intracellular cholesterol transport, and further work is needed to unveil how various routes are regulated and integrated to maintain proper cholesterol distribution and homeostasis in eukaryotic cells.      

STIM1 Is a Novel Component of ER-Chlamydia trachomatis Inclusion Membrane Contact Sites

Productive developmental cycle of the obligate intracellular bacterial pathogen Chlamydia trachomatis depends on the interaction of the replicative vacuole, named the inclusion, with cellular organelles. We have recently reported the formation of ER-Inclusion membrane contact sites (MCSs), where the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is in apposition to the inclusion membrane. These platforms contain the C. trachomatis inclusion membrane protein IncD, the mammalian ceramide transfer protein CERT and the ER resident proteins VAPA/B and were proposed to play a role in the non-vesicular trafficking of lipids to the inclusion. Here, we identify STIM1 as a novel component of ER-Inclusion MCSs. STIM1, an ER calcium (Ca²⁺) sensor that relocate to ER-Plasma Membrane (PM) MCSs upon Ca²⁺ store depletion, associated with C. trachomatis inclusion. STIM1, but not the general ER markers Rtn3C and Sec61ß, was enriched at the inclusion membrane. Ultra-structural studies demonstrated that STIM1 localized to ER-Inclusion MCSs. Time-course experiments showed that STIM1, CERT and VAPB co-localized throughout the developmental cycle. By contrast, Orai1, the PM Ca²⁺ channel that interacts with STIM1 at ER-PM MCSs, did not associate with C. trachomatis inclusion. Upon ER Ca²⁺ store depletion, a pool of STIM1 relocated to ER-PM MCSs, while the existing ER-Inclusion MCSs remained enriched in STIM1. Finally, we have identified the CAD domain, which mediates STIM1-Orai1 interaction, as the minimal domain required for STIM1 enrichment at ER-Inclusion MCSs. Altogether this study identifies STIM1 as a novel component of ER-C. trachomatis inclusion MCSs. We discuss the potential role(s) of STIM1 during the infection process.     

Chlamydiae interaction with the endoplasmic reticulum: contact,function and consequences

Chlamydiae and chlamydiae‐related organisms are obligate intracellular bacterial pathogens. They reside in a membrane‐bound compartment termed the inclusion and have evolved sophisticated mechanisms to interact with cellular organelles. This review focuses on the nature, the function(s) and the consequences of chlamydiae–inclusion interaction with the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). The inclusion membrane establishes very close contact with the ER at specific sites termed ER–inclusion membrane contact sites (MCSs). These MCSs are constituted of a specific set of factors, including the C. trachomatis effector protein IncD and the host cell proteins CERT and VAPA/B. Because CERT and VAPA/B have a demonstrated role in the non‐vesicular trafficking of lipids between the ER and the Golgi, it was proposed that Chlamydia establish MCSs with the ER to acquire host lipids. However, the recruitment of additional factors to ER–inclusion MCSs, such as the ER calcium sensor STIM1, may suggest additional functions unrelated to lipid acquisition. Finally, chlamydiae interaction with the ER appears to induce the ER stress response, but this response is quickly dampened by chlamydiae to promote host cell survival.     

Polyhedral organelles compartmenting bacterial metabolic processes

Bacterial polyhedral organelles are extremely large macromolecular complexes consisting of metabolic enzymes encased within a multiprotein shell that is somewhat reminiscent of a viral capsid. Recent investigations suggest that polyhedral organelles are widely used by bacteria for optimizing metabolic processes. The distribution and diversity of these unique structures has been underestimated because many are not formed during growth on standard laboratory media and because electron microscopy is required for their observation. However, recent physiological studies and genomic analyses tentatively indicate seven functionally distinct organelles distributed among over 40 genera of bacteria. Functional studies conducted thus far are consistent with the idea that polyhedral organelles act as microcompartments that enhance metabolic processes by selectively concentrating specific metabolites. Relatively little is known about how this is achieved at the molecular level. Possible mechanisms include regulation of enzyme activity or efficiency, substrate channeling, a selectively permeable protein shell, and/or differential solubility of metabolites within the organelle. Given their complexity and distinctive structure, it would not be surprising if aspects of their biochemical mechanism are unique. Therefore, the unusual structure of polyhedral organelles raises intriguing questions about their assembly, turnover, and molecular evolution, very little of which is understood.     

Organ-specific distribution and subcellular localisation of ascorbate peroxidase isoenzymes in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) plants

Summary. Ascorbate peroxidase (EC 1.11.1.11), a heme-containing homodimeric protein, is a hydrogen peroxide-scavenging enzyme, playing an important role in plants in order to protect them from oxidative stress, thus adverting cellular damage. Several ascorbate peroxidase isoenzymes have been reported but the understanding of their physiological role still depends on a better knowledge of their precise localisation within plant organs. Immunocytochemistry techniques were performed in order to elucidate the peroxisomal and cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase distribution within tissues of leaves and sprouts of potato plants. The peroxisomal isoenzyme was found to have a broad distribution in sprouts, but a differential one in leaves, being restricted to the spongy parenchyma. This differential expression may be associated to the mesophyll asymmetry and the diverse physiological processes that occur in it. The cytosolic isoenzyme was not detected in leaves under the used conditions, probably because it is present in low amounts in these tissues. The results obtained in sprouts were at least curious: cytosolic ascorbate was found to be adjacent to the amyloplasts. Given these results, it is possible to state that apart from their similarity, these two isoenzymes reside in different organelles and seem to take part in different physiological processes as suggested by their organ- and tissue-specific distribution. Correspondence and reprints: Plant Functional Biology Department, Institute for Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre 823, 4150-180 Porto, Portugal.     

Intracellular organelle networks: Understanding their organization and communication through systems-level modeling and analysis

Background

Membrane-bound intracellular organelles are biochemically distinct compartments used by eukaryotic cells for serving specialized physiological functions and organizing their internal environment. Recent studies revealed surprisingly extensive communication between these organelles and highlighted the network nature of their organization and communication. Since organization and communication of the organelles are carried out at the systems level through their networks, systems-level studies are essential for understanding the underlying mechanisms.

Methods

We reviewed recent studies that used systems-level quantitative modeling and analysis to understand organization and communication of intracellular organelle networks.

Results

We first review modeling and analysis studies on how fusion/fission and degradation/biogenesis, two essential and closely related classes of activities of individual organelles, collectively mediate the dynamic organization of their networks. We then turn to another important aspect of the dynamic organization of the organelle networks, namely how organelles are physically connected within their networks, a property referred to as the topology of the networks in mathematics, and summarize some of their distinct properties. Lastly, we briefly review modeling and analysis studies that aim to understand communication between different organelle networks, focusing on cellular calcium homeostasis as an example. We conclude with a brief discussion of future directions for research in this area.

Conclusion

Together, the reviewed studies provide critical insights into how diverse activities of individual organelles collectively mediate the organization and communication of their networks. They demonstrate the essential role of systemslevel modeling and analysis in understanding complex behavior of such networks.

     

电子断层成像技术及其在细胞生物学中的应用

电子断层成像技术（electrontomography）是近年来发展起来一项三维成像技术,可以在纳米分辨率（2-10nm）水平上获得生物大分子及其复合物或聚集体、细胞器、细胞以及组织的三维结构,而且可以用于研究生物大分子在细胞中的定位、排列、分布以及相互作用,已逐渐成为细胞生物学领域中的一项重要技术手段。该文针对这项技术及其在细胞生物学中的应用作一简要介绍。     

Cnm1: A bridge between mitochondria and nuclear ER

Few membrane contact sites have been defined at the molecular level. By using a high-throughput, microscopy-based screen, Eisenberg-Bord, Zung et al. (2021. J. Cell Biol. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.202104100) identify Cnm1 as a novel tethering protein that mediates contact between mitochondria and the nuclear ER in response to phospholipid levels.

Organelles communicate through the exchange of biological materials by vesicular trafficking or at sites of close membrane apposition known as membrane contact sites (MCSs). While the molecular machinery mediating vesicular trafficking has been well characterized, our knowledge of the molecules involved in forming and regulating MCSs is limited. MCSs physically tether two or more organelles via protein–protein or protein–lipid interactions, contain defined proteomes, and perform specific biological functions (1). While MCSs have been appreciated microscopically since the 1950s, only recently have advances in technology permitted the discovery of the molecular composition of some MCSs (2). A major breakthrough occurred when a synthetic biology screen identified the ER–mitochondria encounter structure (ERMES), which forms an MCS between the ER and mitochondria (3). ERMES has since been shown to be involved in phospholipid transport between mitochondria and the ER (4). While ERMES is one of the best characterized MCSs, there are still many questions as to the precise molecules being transported at ER–mitochondria contacts and how directionality of transport is achieved. Subsequent studies using split fluorescent proteins revealed that nearly all organelles appear to form MCSs of some kind (5). Thus, despite progress in defining the components and functions of a few MCSs, there are still many MCSs whose molecular identities are completely unknown.Recently, a study in mammalian cells identified an MCS between the nucleus and mitochondria that plays a role in adapting cells to stress via the mitochondrial retrograde signaling response (6). The proteins that form this MCS are not conserved in yeast, however, suggesting that alternative mechanisms for nucleus–mitochondria contacts exist in other organisms. In this issue, Eisenberg-Bord, Zung et al., set out to identify proteins involved in forming an MCS between mitochondria and the nuclear ER that is distinct from ERMES-mediated ER–mitochondria contacts (7). First, high-resolution cryo-electron tomographs revealed that mitochondria form contacts with the nucleus that have an average separation of ∼20 nm, which is within the expected range for a bona fide MCS (1). To identify the molecular composition of this contact site, the authors generated a synthetic reporter that is specific to nucleus-mitochondria contacts by fusing one part of a split fluorescent protein to an outer mitochondrial membrane protein and the other to a peripheral nuclear protein. A high-throughput, microscopy-based genetic screen was then used to compare the localization of the synthetic reporter to fluorescently tagged versions of all yeast proteins. Candidates were refined by determining which proteins caused an expansion of the nucleus–mitochondria contact site upon overexpression, a phenotype that has been observed with other MCS proteins (8). Based on these results, the best candidate for a molecular tether between mitochondria and the nucleus was Ybr063c.Ybr063c is a 46-kD nonessential protein of uncharacterized function that contains predicted transmembrane domains. The authors first demonstrated that Ybr063c is an integral membrane protein residing on the nuclear membrane. In support of Ybr063c forming a nucleus–mitochondria contact site that is distinct from ERMES, Ybr063c did not colocalize with ERMES subunits nor did overexpression of Ybr063c alter the size of ERMES patches. Remarkably, overexpression of Ybr063c resulted in the mitochondrial network becoming tightly associated with the nuclear membrane. Based on these results, the authors concluded that Ybr063c functions as a molecular tether between mitochondria and the nucleus and the protein was renamed Cnm1 for contact nucleus mitochondria 1.Through further genetic screens, Eisenberg-Bord, Zung et al., identified several genes that are required to cluster mitochondria around the nucleus when Cnm1 is overexpressed. Interestingly, several of these genes are known to function in phosphatidylcholine (PC) metabolism. Deletion of these components resulted in a decrease in Cnm1 expression, which alters the extent of nucleus-mitochondria contacts. Overexpression of Cnm1 in genetic conditions that reduce PC levels resulted in exaggerated growth defects. These results raise the possibility that Cnm1-mediated nuclear–mitochondria contacts may be involved in the transport of PC from the ER to mitochondria. Thus, while the functional importance is unknown, Cnm1-mediated nuclear–mitochondria contacts respond to PC levels.The genetic screens also identified a single resident mitochondrial protein, Tom70, as affecting the ability of overexpressed Cnm1 to cluster mitochondria around the nucleus. Subsequent experiments demonstrated that localization of Cnm1 to the nuclear membrane and Tom70 to the mitochondrial membrane is required to tether mitochondria to the nucleus upon overexpression of Cnm1. Thus, Cnm1 and Tom70 mediate an MCS between mitochondria and the nucleus.The identification of Cnm1-mediated nucleus–mitochondria contacts opens many questions about the function and composition of the contact site and how it operates in the broader context of mitochondrial–nuclear communication. While identifying the functions of MCSs has proven challenging, the genetic screens conducted in this study provide an excellent starting point by elucidating a link between Cnm1 and PC metabolism. The authors propose that Cnm1-mediated contacts could function in the direct transport of PC from the ER to mitochondria (Fig. 1). In this model, ERMES, which likely functions in earlier steps of PC synthesis by transporting phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) or phosphatidylserine (PS), would have a distinct but related function in organizing and maintaining a pipeline for the transport of lipids between the ER and mitochondria (Fig. 1). This model is speculative, however, and future experiments will be necessary to define the role of Cnm1 in PC metabolism.Open in a separate windowFigure 1.The ER and vacuole form multiple MCSs with mitochondria in budding yeast. The ER is depicted in green, and the mitochondrial network is depicted in gray. ERMES mediates an MCS between tubular ER and mitochondria. In addition to functions that are distinct from lipid trafficking, ERMES-mediated MCSs likely function to transport PS or PE between the organelles. Cnm1 mediates an MCS specifically between the nuclear ER and mitochondria and potentially functions in PC transport. The Vps13-Mcp1 vCLAMP mediates an MCS between mitochondria and the vacuole that likely functions in lipid transport and may have redundant functions with ERMES. The Vps39-Tom40 vCLAMP is a separate MCS between mitochondria and the vacuole that responds to different stress conditions, though its function is unknown.There is a growing body of evidence that two organelles can form multiple MCSs that are spatially and functionally distinct. In addition to ERMES and Cnm1-mediated mitochondria–ER contacts, in yeast, two distinct MCSs have been described between mitochondria and the vacuole that are referred to as vacuolar and mitochondrial patches, or vCLAMPs. One, mediated by Vam6 and Tom40, has been implicated in responding to cellular stress while the other, mediated by Mcp1 and Vps13, may have overlapping functions with the ERMES complex (8, 9; Fig. 1). Interestingly, many of the proteins present at MCSs have been shown to be multifunctional (2). For example, the vCLAMP component Vam6 is also a subunit of the homotypic fusion and protein-sorting (HOPS) complex while its binding partner Tom40 is the central subunit of the translocase of outer membrane (TOM) complex (8). Thus, while these complexes have distinct biological functions in vacuolar protein sorting and mitochondrial protein import respectively, individual subunits have moonlighting functions in the formation, and perhaps function, of MCSs. Eisenberg-Bord, Zung et al., now reveal that Tom70, another component of the TOM complex, also plays a role in the formation of nucleus–mitochondria contacts. This raises the exciting possibility that cells use these multifunctional proteins to coordinate functions such as mitochondrial protein import with lipid trafficking. A crucial next step will be to determine how the multiple functions of these proteins are coordinated to maintain organelle homeostasis.Nuclear–mitochondrial communication is a critical aspect of eukaryotic cellular life that allows cells to adapt to different environmental conditions and energy needs. A breakdown in communication between mitochondria and the nucleus has been implicated in several diseases, including cancers (10). The formation of a nucleus–mitochondria MCS likely facilitates the exchange of lipids or small molecules that stimulate signaling pathways to help cells respond to environmental changes or mitochondrial damage (6, 7). Identifying the molecules that regulate these contacts and clarifying the physiological contexts under which these contacts function is crucial to our understanding of human disease. Thus, the identification of a nucleus-mitochondria MCS represents a significant breakthrough in our understanding of nucleus–mitochondria communication.     

Chemo- and opto-genetic tools for dissecting the role of membrane contact sites in living cells: Recent advances and limitations

Membrane contact sites (MCSs) are morphologically defined intracellular structures where cellular membranes are closely apposed. Recent progress has significantly advanced our understanding of MCSs with the use of new tools and techniques. Visualization of MCSs in living cells by split fluorescence proteins or FRET-based techniques tells us the dynamic property of MCSs. Manipulation of MCSs by chemically-induced dimerization (CID) or light-induced dimerization (LID) greatly contributes to our understanding of their functional aspects including inter-organelle lipid transport mediated by lipid transfer proteins (LTPs). Here we highlight recent advances in these tools and techniques as applied to MCSs, and we discuss their advantages and limitations.