A concept for G protein activation by G protein-coupled receptor dimers: the transducin/rhodopsin interface.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are ubiquitous and essential in modulating virtually all physiological processes. These receptors share a similar structural design consisting of the seven-transmembrane alpha-helical segments. The active conformations of the receptors are stabilized by an agonist and couple to structurally highly conserved heterotrimeric G proteins. One of the most important unanswered questions is how GPCRs couple to their cognate G proteins. Phototransduction represents an excellent model system for understanding G protein signaling, owing to the high expression of rhodopsin in rod photoreceptors and the multidisciplinary experimental approaches used to study this GPCR. Here, we describe how a G protein (transducin) docks on to an oligomeric GPCR (rhodopsin), revealing structural details of this critical interface in the signal transduction process. This conceptual model takes into account recent structural information on the receptor and G protein, as well as oligomeric states of GPCRs.     

G protein selectivity is regulated by multiple intracellular regions of GPCRs

GTP-binding protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) bind to a vast diversity of extracellular ligands to regulate a wide variety of physiological responses. Upon binding of extracellular ligands, these seven-transmembrane-spanning receptor molecules couple to one or several subtypes of G protein which reside at the intracellular side of the plasma membrane to trigger intracellular signaling events. Amid the large structural diversity at the intracellular regions of GPCRs, there are only 18 different subtypes of G protein belonging to four subfamilies. The question of how GPCRs select and activate a single or multiple G protein subtype(s) has been the topic of intense investigations. This review will attempt to summarize the available data on the structural determinants in GPCRs that regulate the selectivity of G protein activation. The available data suggest that G protein can be activated by structurally diverse cationic alpha-helical structures with no obvious homology in primary sequence. The selectivity of receptor-G protein coupling is maintained by a combination of two functional domains at the intracellular region. One is the 'activation domain' which can activate multiple G protein subtypes, while the other is the 'selectivity domain' which restricts the coupling to the desired signaling pathway(s). A slight change in the conformation at these two functional domains can affect the fidelity of G protein selectivity. This hypothesis can account for the vast structural diversity of GPCRs which link a fascinating variety of extracellular inputs, yet couple to a limited number of intracellular signaling pathways.     

An olfactory receptor pseudogene whose function emerged in humans: a case study in the evolution of structure–function in GPCRs

Human olfactory receptor, hOR17-210, is identified as a pseudogene in the human genome. Experimental data has shown however, that the gene product of frame-shifted, cloned hOR17-210 cDNA was able to bind an odorant-binding protein and is narrowly tuned for excitation by cyclic ketones. Supported by experimental results, we used the bioinformatics methods of sequence analysis (genome-wide and pair-wise), computational protein modeling and docking, to show that functionality in this receptor is retained due to sequence-structure features not previously observed in mammalian ORs. This receptor does not possess the first two transmembrane helical domains (of seven typically seen in GPCRs). It however, possesses an additional TM that has not been observed in other human olfactory receptors. By incorporating these novel structural features, we created two putative models for this receptor. We also docked odor ligands that were experimentally shown to bind hOR17-210. We show how and why structural modifications of OR17-210 do not hinder this receptor's functionality. Our studies reveal that novel gene rearrangements that result in sequence and structural diversity may have a bearing on OR and GPCR function and evolution.     

Analysis of a G protein-coupled receptor for neurotensin by liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry

The type 1 neurotensin receptor (NTS1) belongs to the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family. GPCRs are involved in important physiological processes, but for many GPCRs ligand binding sites and other structural features have yet to be elucidated. Comprehensive analyses by mass spectrometry (MS) could address such issues, but they are complicated by the hydrophobic nature of the receptors. Recombinant NTS1 must be purified in the presence of detergents to maintain solubility and functionality of the receptor, to allow testing of ligand, or to allow G protein interaction. However, detergents are detrimental to MS analyses. Hence, steps need to be taken to substitute the detergents with MS-compatible polar/organic solvents. Here we report the characterization of NTS1 by electrospray ionization (ESI)-MS with emphasis on methods to transfer intact NTS1 or its proteolytic peptides into compatible solvents by protein precipitation and liquid chromatography (LC) prior to ESI-MS analyses. Molecular mass measurement of intact recombinant NTS1 was performed using a mixture of chloroform/methanol/aqueous trifluoroacetic acid as the mobile phase for size exclusion chromatography-ESI-MS analysis. In a separate experiment, NTS1 was digested with a combination of cyanogen bromide and trypsin and/or chymotrypsin. Subsequent reversed phase LC-ESI-tandem MS analysis resulted in greater than 80% sequence coverage of the NTS1 protein, including all seven transmembrane domains. This work represents the first comprehensive analysis of recombinant NTS1 using MS.     

Classification of amine type G-protein coupled receptors with feature selection

G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) are involved in various physiological processes. Therefore, classification of amine type GPCRs is important for proper understanding of their functions. Though some effective methods have been developed, it still remains unknown how many and which features are essential for this task. Empirical studies show that feature selection might address this problem and provide us with some biologically useful knowledge. In this paper, a feature selection technique is introduced to identify those relevant features of proteins which are potentially important for the prediction of amine type GPCRs. The selected features are finally accepted to characterize proteins in a more compact form. High prediction accuracy is observed on two data sets with different sequence similarity by 5-fold cross-validation test. The comparison with a previous method demonstrates the efficiency and effectiveness of the proposed method.     

Ins and outs of GPCR signaling in primary cilia

Primary cilia are specialized microtubule‐based signaling organelles that convey extracellular signals into a cellular response in most vertebrate cell types. The physiological significance of primary cilia is underscored by the fact that defects in assembly or function of these organelles lead to a range of severe diseases and developmental disorders. In most cell types of the human body, signaling by primary cilia involves different G protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs), which transmit specific signals to the cell through G proteins to regulate diverse cellular and physiological events. Here, we provide an overview of GPCR signaling in primary cilia, with main focus on the rhodopsin‐like (class A) and the smoothened/frizzled (class F) GPCRs. We describe how such receptors dynamically traffic into and out of the ciliary compartment and how they interact with other classes of ciliary GPCRs, such as class B receptors, to control ciliary function and various physiological and behavioral processes. Finally, we discuss future avenues for developing GPCR‐targeted drug strategies for the treatment of ciliopathies.     

DEP-domain-mediated regulation of GPCR signaling responses

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) mediate cellular responses to a variety of stimuli, but how specific responses are regulated has been elusive, as the types of GPCRs vastly outnumber the classes of G protein heterotrimers available to initiate downstream signaling. In our analysis of signaling proteins containing DEP domains ( approximately 90 residue sequence motifs first recognized in fly Dishevelled, worm EGL-10, and mammalian Pleckstrin), we find that DEP domains are responsible for specific recognition of GPCRs. We examined the yeast regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) protein Sst2 and demonstrate that the DEP domains in Sst2 mediate binding to its cognate GPCR (Ste2). DEP-domain-mediated tethering promotes downregulation by placing the RGS protein in proximity to its substrate (receptor-activated Galpha subunit). Sst2 docks to the Ste2 cytosolic tail, but only its unphosphorylated state, allowing for release and recycling of this regulator upon receptor desensitization and internalization. DEP-domain-mediated targeting of effectors and regulators to specific GPCRs provides a means to dictate the nature, duration, and specificity of the response.     

Identification of ciliary localization sequences within the third intracellular loop of G protein-coupled receptors

Primary cilia are sensory organelles present on most mammalian cells. The functions of cilia are defined by the signaling proteins localized to the ciliary membrane. Certain G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), including somatostatin receptor 3 (Sstr3) and serotonin receptor 6 (Htr6), localize to cilia. As Sstr3 and Htr6 are the only somatostatin and serotonin receptor subtypes that localize to cilia, we hypothesized they contain ciliary localization sequences. To test this hypothesis we expressed chimeric receptors containing fragments of Sstr3 and Htr6 in the nonciliary receptors Sstr5 and Htr7, respectively, in ciliated cells. We found the third intracellular loop of Sstr3 or Htr6 is sufficient for ciliary localization. Comparison of these loops revealed a loose consensus sequence. To determine whether this consensus sequence predicts ciliary localization of other GPCRs, we compared it with the third intracellular loop of all human GPCRs. We identified the consensus sequence in melanin-concentrating hormone receptor 1 (Mchr1) and confirmed Mchr1 localizes to primary cilia in vitro and in vivo. Thus, we have identified a putative GPCR ciliary localization sequence and used this sequence to identify a novel ciliary GPCR. As Mchr1 mediates feeding behavior and metabolism, our results implicate ciliary signaling in the regulation of body weight.     

NMR structure of the second intracellular loop of the alpha 2A adrenergic receptor: evidence for a novel cytoplasmic helix

A major, unresolved question in signal transduction by G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) is to understand how, at atomic resolution, a GPCR activates a G protein. A step toward answering this question was made with the determination of the high-resolution structure of rhodopsin; we now know the intramolecular interactions that characterize the resting conformation of a GPCR. To what degree does this structure represent a structural paradigm for other GPCRs, especially at the cytoplasmic surface where GPCR-G protein interaction occurs and where the sequence homology is low among GPCRs? To address this question, we performed NMR studies on approximately 35-residue-long peptides including the critical second intracellular loop (i2) of the alpha 2A adrenergic receptor (AR) and of rhodopsin. To stabilize the secondary structure of the peptide termini, 4-12 residues from the adjacent transmembrane helices were included and structures determined in dodecylphosphocholine micelles. We also characterized the effects on an alpha 2A AR peptide of a D130I mutation in the conserved DRY motif. Our results show that in contrast to the L-shaped loop in the i2 of rhodopsin, the i2 of the alpha 2A AR is predominantly helical, supporting the hypothesis that there is structural diversity within GPCR intracellular loops. The D130I mutation subtly modulates the helical structure. The spacing of nonpolar residues in i2 with helical periodicity is a predictor of helical versus loop structure. These data should lead to more accurate models of the intracellular surface of GPCRs and of receptor-mediated G protein activation.     

Two to tango: GPCR oligomers and GPCR-TRP channel interactions in nociception

G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent the largest family of cell surface receptors that are involved in regulating several physiological and behavioral responses in organisms. Indeed, over half of all the approved drugs on the market target GPCRs. Over the past twenty years, several lines of evidence have suggested that GPCRs associate to form oligomeric structures that substantially expand the complexity of signaling processes in vivo. In addition, GPCRs have also been shown to functionally regulate ion channels and help fine-tune neurotransmission. In this review, we will discuss recent advances in both mechanisms, with specific focus on opioid receptors, cannabinoid receptors and transient receptor potential (TRP) calcium channels in nociception. A better understanding of such mechanisms will be imperative in designing analgesics devoid of deleterious side effects and mitigating drug abuse.     

The putative signal peptide of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor is not required for receptor synthesis but promotes receptor expression

GLP-1R (glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor) mediates the ‘incretin effect’ and many other anti-diabetic actions of its cognate ligand, GLP-1 (glucagon-like peptide-1). It belongs to the class B family of GPCRs (G protein-coupled receptors) and possesses an N-terminal putative SP (signal peptide). It has been reported that this sequence is required for the synthesis of GLP-1R and is cleaved after receptor synthesis. In the present study, we conducted an in-depth exploration towards the role of the putative SP in GLP-1R synthesis. A mutant GLP-1R without this sequence was expressed in HEK293 cells (human embryonic kidney 293 cells) and displayed normal functionality with respect to ligand binding and activation of adenylate cyclase. Thus the putative SP does not seem to be required for receptor synthesis. Immunoblotting analysis shows that the amount of GLP-1R synthesized in HEK293 cells is low when the putative SP is absent. This indicates that the role of the sequence is to promote the expression of GLP-1R. Furthermore, epitopes tagged at the N-terminal of GLP-1R are detectable by immunofluorescence and immunoblotting in our experiments. In conclusion, the present study points to different roles of SP in GLP-1R expression which broadens our understanding of the functionality of this putative SP of GLP-1R and possibly other Class B GPCRs.     

Classification of G-protein coupled receptors based on support vector machine with maximum relevance minimum redundancy and genetic algorithm

Background  

Because a priori knowledge about function of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can provide useful information to pharmaceutical research, the determination of their function is a quite meaningful topic in protein science. However, with the rapid increase of GPCRs sequences entering into databanks, the gap between the number of known sequence and the number of known function is widening rapidly, and it is both time-consuming and expensive to determine their function based only on experimental techniques. Therefore, it is vitally significant to develop a computational method for quick and accurate classification of GPCRs.     

GPCR signalling to the translation machinery

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are involved in most physiological processes, many of them being engaged in fully differentiated cells. These receptors couple to transducers of their own, primarily G proteins and β-arrestins, which launch intracellular signalling cascades. Some of these signalling events regulate the translational machinery to fine-tune general cell metabolism or to alter protein expression pattern. Though extensively documented for tyrosine kinase receptors, translational regulation by GPCRs is still poorly appreciated. The objective of this review paper is to address the following questions: i) is there a “GPCR signature” impacting on the translational machinery, and ultimately on the type of mRNA translated? ii) are the regulatory networks involved similar as those utilized by tyrosine kinase receptors? In particular, we will discuss the specific features of translational control mediated by GPCRs and highlight the intrinsic properties of GPCRs these mechanisms could rely on.     

Structural biology of G protein‐coupled receptor signaling complexes

G protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs) constitute the largest family of cell surface receptors that mediate numerous cell signaling pathways, and are targets of more than one‐third of clinical drugs. Thanks to the advancement of novel structural biology technologies, high‐resolution structures of GPCRs in complex with their signaling transducers, including G‐protein and arrestin, have been determined. These 3D complex structures have significantly improved our understanding of the molecular mechanism of GPCR signaling and provided a structural basis for signaling‐biased drug discovery targeting GPCRs. Here we summarize structural studies of GPCR signaling complexes with G protein and arrestin using rhodopsin as a model system, and highlight the key features of GPCR conformational states in biased signaling including the sequence motifs of receptor TM6 that determine selective coupling of G proteins, and the phosphorylation codes of GPCRs for arrestin recruitment. We envision the future of GPCR structural biology not only to solve more high‐resolution complex structures but also to show stepwise GPCR signaling complex assembly and disassembly and dynamic process of GPCR signal transduction.     

Integrative bioinformatics for functional genome annotation: trawling for G protein-coupled receptors

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) are amongst the best studied and most functionally diverse types of cell-surface protein. The importance of GPCRs as mediates or cell function and organismal developmental underlies their involvement in key physiological roles and their prominence as targets for pharmacological therapeutics. In this review, we highlight the requirement for integrated protocols which underline the different perspectives offered by different sequence analysis methods. BLAST and FastA offer broad brush strokes. Motif-based search methods add the fine detail. Structural modelling offers another perspective which allows us to elucidate the physicochemical properties that underlie ligand binding. Together, these different views provide a more informative and a more detailed picture of GPCR structure and function. Many GPCRs remain orphan receptors with no identified ligand, yet as computer-driven functional genomics starts to elaborate their functions, a new understanding of their roles in cell and developmental biology will follow.     

Prediction of G-protein-coupled receptor classes

Being the largest family of cell surface receptors, G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are among the most frequent targets of therapeutic drugs. The functions of many of GPCRs are unknown, and it is both time-consuming and expensive to determine their ligands and signaling pathways. This forces us to face a critical challenge: how to develop an automated method for classifying the family of GPCRs so as to help us in classifying drugs and expedite the process of drug discovery. Owing to their highly divergent nature, it is difficult to predict the classification of GPCRs by means of conventional sequence alignment approaches. To cope with such a situation, the CD (Covariant Discriminant) predictor was introduced to predict the families of GPCRs. The overall success rate thus obtained by jack-knife test for 1238 GPCRs classified into three main families, i.e., class A-"rhodopsin like", class B-"secretin like", and class C-"metabotrophic/glutamate/pheromone", was over 97%. The high success rate suggests that the CD predictor holds very high potential to become a useful tool for understanding the actions of drugs that target GPCRs and designing new medications with fewer side effects and greater efficacy.     

G蛋白偶联受体与G蛋白相互作用的最新研究进展

传统观念认为,在激动剂作用下,G蛋白偶联受体(GPCRs)能够激活G蛋白的α亚基,从而使Gα亚基与Gβγ亚基分离,被激活的Gα亚基通过信号转导进一步参与细胞的生理过程。但是,最新研究发现GPCRs和G蛋白存在多种偶联关系,GPCRs不仅能够激活Gα亚基,还可以与Gβγ亚基相互靠近,甚至会使G蛋白亚基构象发生重排而不分离,这对于疾病发病机制的研究及新的药物靶点的发现具有重要意义。就GPCRs与G蛋白之间的相互作用以及最新研究技术作一简要综述。     

Greatly enhanced detection of a volatile ligand at femtomolar levels using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET)

Our goal is to develop a general transduction system for G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). GPCRs are present in most eukaryote cells and transduce diverse extracellular signals. GPCRs comprise not only the largest class of integral membrane receptors but also the largest class of targets for therapeutic drugs. In all cases studied, binding of ligand to a GPCR leads to a sub-nanometer intramolecular rearrangement. Here, we report the creation of a novel chimaeric BRET-based biosensor by insertion of sequences encoding a bioluminescent donor and a fluorescent acceptor protein into the primary sequence of a GPCR. The BRET(2)-ODR-10 biosensor was expressed in membranes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Assays conducted on isolated membranes indicated an EC(50) in the femtomolar range for diacetyl. The response was ligand-specific and was abolished by a single point mutation in the receptor sequence. Novel BRET-GPCR biosensors of this type have potential application in many fields including explosive detection, quality control of food and beverage production, clinical diagnosis and drug discovery.     

Electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy on G-protein-coupled receptors: Adopting strategies from related model systems

Membrane proteins, including ion channels, transporters and G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), play a significant role in various physiological processes. Many of these proteins are difficult to express in large quantities, imposing crucial experimental restrictions. Nevertheless, there is now a wide variety of studies available utilizing electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopic techniques that expand experimental accessibility by using relatively small quantities of protein. Here, we give an overview starting from basic strategies in EPR on membrane proteins with a focus on GPCRs, while emphasizing several applications from recent years. We highlight how the arsenal of EPR-based techniques may provide significant further contributions to understanding the complex molecular machinery and energetic phenomena responsible for seamless workflow in essential biological processes.