Regulation of the Cortical Actin Cytoskeleton in Budding Yeast by Twinfilin,a Ubiquitous Actin Monomer-sequestering Protein

Here we describe the identification of a novel 37-kD actin monomer binding protein in budding yeast. This protein, which we named twinfilin, is composed of two cofilin-like regions. In our sequence database searches we also identified human, mouse, and Caenorhabditis elegans homologues of yeast twinfilin, suggesting that twinfilins form an evolutionarily conserved family of actin-binding proteins. Purified recombinant twinfilin prevents actin filament assembly by forming a 1:1 complex with actin monomers, and inhibits the nucleotide exchange reaction of actin monomers. Despite the sequence homology with the actin filament depolymerizing cofilin/actin-depolymerizing factor (ADF) proteins, our data suggests that twinfilin does not induce actin filament depolymerization. In yeast cells, a green fluorescent protein (GFP)–twinfilin fusion protein localizes primarily to cytoplasm, but also to cortical actin patches. Overexpression of the twinfilin gene (TWF1) results in depolarization of the cortical actin patches. A twf1 null mutation appears to result in increased assembly of cortical actin structures and is synthetically lethal with the yeast cofilin mutant cof1-22, shown previously to cause pronounced reduction in turnover of cortical actin filaments. Taken together, these results demonstrate that twinfilin is a novel, highly conserved actin monomer-sequestering protein involved in regulation of the cortical actin cytoskeleton.     

Two distinct regions of calponin share common binding sites on actin resulting in different modes of calponin–actin interaction

Calponins are a small family of proteins that alter the interaction between actin and myosin II and mediate signal transduction. These proteins bind F-actin in a complex manner that depends on a variety of parameters such as stoichiometry and ionic strength. Calponin binds G-actin and F-actin, bundling the latter primarily through two distinct and adjacent binding sites (ABS1 and ABS2). Calponin binds other proteins that bind F-actin and considerable disagreements exist as to how calponin is located on the filament, especially in the presence of other proteins. A study (Galkin, V.E., Orlova, A., Fattoum, A., Walsh, M.P. and Egelman, E.H. (2006) J. Mol. Biol. 359, 478–485.), using EM single-particle reconstruction has shown that there may be four modes of interaction, but how these occur is not yet known. We report that two distinct regions of calponin are capable of binding some of the same sites on actin (such as 18–28 and 360–372 in subdomain 1). This accounts for the finding that calponin binds the filament with different apparent geometries. We suggest that the four modes of filament binding account for differences in stoichiometry and that these, in turn, arise from differential binding of the two calponin regions to actin. It is likely that the modes of binding are reciprocally influenced by other actin-binding proteins since members of the α-actinin group also adopt different actin-binding positions and bind actin principally through a domain that is similar to calponin's ABS1.     

Isolation and properties of two actin-binding domains in gelsolin

Gelsolin is a Ca2+-sensitive 90-kDa protein which regulates actin filament length. A molecular variant of gelsolin is present in plasma as a 93-kDa protein. Functional studies have shown that gelsolin contains two actin-binding sites which are distinct in that after Ca2+-mediated binding, removal of free Ca2+ releases actin from one site but not from the other. We have partially cleaved human plasma gelsolin with alpha-chymotrypsin and identified two distinct actin-binding domains. Peptides CT17 and CT15, which contain one of the actin-binding domains, bind to actin independently of Ca2+; peptides CT54 and CT47, which contain the other domain, bind to actin reversibly in response to changes in Ca2+ concentration. These peptides sequester actin monomers inhibiting polymerization. Unlike intact gelsolin, neither group of peptides nucleates actin assembly or forms stable filament end caps. CT17 and CT15 can however sever actin filaments. Amino acid sequence analyses place CT17 at the NH2 terminus of gelsolin and CT47 at the carboxyl-terminal two-thirds of gelsolin. Circular dichroism measurements show that Ca2+ induces an increase in the alpha-helical content of CT47. These studies provide a structural basis for understanding the interaction of gelsolin with actin and allow comparison with other Ca2+-dependent actin filament severing proteins.     

Isolation of actin-binding protein and villin from toad oocytes

Two actin-modulating proteins have been purified from toad oocytes. A high-molecular weight protein, similar in structure and function to macrophage actin-binding protein, accounts for the isotropic actin-crosslinking activity in oocyte homogenates. A calcium-dependent activity in toad oocyte homogenates which shortens actin filaments is accounted for by a 95,000-dalton protein which resembles villin, an actin-severing and -bundling protein of avian epithelial brush borders. In the presence of high (? μM) calcium, this protein shortens actin filaments in a concentration-dependent fashion and stimulates filament assembly when added to monomeric actin. In the absence of calcium the protein promotes the formation of actin filament bundles. Therefore, in the toad oocyte actin can be crosslinked into a network by actin-binding protein. Calcium regulation of the actin network may be mediated by villin. These results are different from those reported in echinoderm eggs.     

Toxoplasma gondii Actin Depolymerizing Factor Acts Primarily to Sequester G-actin

Toxoplasma gondii is a protozoan parasite belonging to the phylum Apicomplexa. Parasites in this phylum utilize a unique process of motility termed gliding, which is dependent on parasite actin filaments. Surprisingly, 98% of parasite actin is maintained as G-actin, suggesting that filaments are rapidly assembled and turned over. Little is known about the regulated disassembly of filaments in the Apicomplexa. In higher eukaryotes, the related actin depolymerizing factor (ADF) and cofilin proteins are essential regulators of actin filament turnover. ADF is one of the few actin-binding proteins conserved in apicomplexan parasites. In this study we examined the mechanism by which T. gondii ADF (TgADF) regulates actin filament turnover. Unlike other members of the ADF/cofilin (AC) family, apicomplexan ADFs lack key F-actin binding sites. Surprisingly, this promotes their enhanced disassembly of actin filaments. Restoration of the C-terminal F-actin binding site to TgADF stabilized its interaction with filaments but reduced its net filament disassembly activity. Analysis of severing activity revealed that TgADF is a weak severing protein, requiring much higher concentrations than typical AC proteins. Investigation of TgADF interaction with T. gondii actin (TgACT) revealed that TgADF disassembled short TgACT oligomers. Kinetic and steady-state polymerization assays demonstrated that TgADF has strong monomer-sequestering activity, inhibiting TgACT polymerization at very low concentrations. Collectively these data indicate that TgADF promoted the efficient turnover of actin filaments via weak severing of filaments and strong sequestering of monomers. This suggests a dual role for TgADF in maintaining high G-actin concentrations and effecting rapid filament turnover.     

Identification of Obscure yet Conserved Actin-Associated Proteins in Giardia lamblia

Consistent with its proposed status as an early branching eukaryote, Giardia has the most divergent actin of any eukaryote and lacks core actin regulators. Although conserved actin-binding proteins are missing from Giardia, its actin is utilized similarly to that of other eukaryotes and functions in core cellular processes such as cellular organization, endocytosis, and cytokinesis. We set out to identify actin-binding proteins in Giardia using affinity purification coupled with mass spectroscopy (multidimensional protein identification technology [MudPIT]) and have identified >80 putative actin-binding proteins. Several of these have homology to conserved proteins known to complex with actin for functions in the nucleus and flagella. We validated localization and interaction for seven of these proteins, including 14-3-3, a known cytoskeletal regulator with a controversial relationship to actin. Our results indicate that although Giardia lacks canonical actin-binding proteins, there is a conserved set of actin-interacting proteins that are evolutionarily indispensable and perhaps represent some of the earliest functions of the actin cytoskeleton.     

Binding of gelsolin domain 2 to actin. An actin interface distinct from that of gelsolin domain 1 and from ADF/cofilin.

It is generally assumed that of the six domains that comprise gelsolin, domain 2 is primarily responsible for the initial contact with the actin filament that will ultimately result in the filament being severed. Other actin-binding regions within domains 1 and 4 are involved in gelsolin's severing and subsequent capping activity. The overall fold of all gelsolin repeated domains are similar to the actin depolymerizing factor (ADF)/cofilin family of actin-binding proteins and it has been proposed that there is a similarity in the actin-binding interface. Gelsolin domains 1 and 4 bind G-actin in a similar manner and compete with each other, whereas domain 2 binds F-actin at physiological salt concentrations, and does not compete with domain 1. Here we investigate the domain 2 : actin interface and compare this to our recent studies of the cofilin : actin interface. We conclude that important differences exist between the interfaces of actin with gelsolin domains 1 and 2, and with ADF/cofilin. We present a model for F-actin binding of domain 2 with respect to the F-actin severing and capping activity of the whole gelsolin molecule.     

Direct modulation of the host cell cytoskeleton by Salmonella actin-binding proteins

Invasive Salmonella trigger their own uptake into non-phagocytic eukaryotic cells by delivering virulence proteins that stimulate signaling pathways and remodel the actin cytoskeleton. It has recently emerged that Salmonella encodes two actin-binding proteins, SipC and SipA, which together efficiently nucleate actin polymerization and stabilize the resulting supramolecular filament architecture. Therefore, Salmonella might directly initiate actin polymerization independently of the cellular Arp2/3 complex early in the cell entry process. This is an unprecedented example of a direct intervention strategy to facilitate entry of a pathogen into a target cell. Here, we discuss the Salmonella actin-binding proteins and how they might function in combination with entry effectors that stimulate Rho GTPases. We propose that membrane-targeted bacterial effector proteins might trigger actin polymerization through diverse mechanisms during cell entry by bacterial pathogens.     

Co-loss of profilin I, II and cofilin with actin from maturing phagosomes inDictyostelium discoideum

Summary Although it is known that actin polymerizes rapidly at the plasma membrane during the ingestion phase of phagocytosis, not yet fully understood are the mechanisms by which actin is recruited to form a phagoeytic cup and subsequently is dissociated from the phagosome. The aim of this study was to identify actin-binding proteins that mediated actin filament dynamics during phagosome formation and processing. We report that profilins I and II, which promote filament assembly, and cofilin, which stimulates filament disassembly, were constituents of phagosomes isolated fromDictyostelium discoideum fed latex beads, and associated with actin. Biochemical analyses detected one isoform only of cofilin, which bound actin in unstimulated cells as well as in cells engaged in phagocytosis, subjected to various stress treatments, and through development. At membranes of young phagosomes, profilins I and II colocalized with monomeric actin labeled with fluorescent DNase I, and cofilin colocalized with filamentous actin labeled with rhodamine phalloidin. Both immunocytochemical and quantitative immunoblotting data indicated that the kinetic loss of profilins I, II, and cofilin of maturing phagosomes closely followed the falling levels of actin associated with the vesicles. As evidence of vesicle processing,D. discoideum crystal protein (an esterase) was recruited rapidly to phagosomes and its levels increased while those of actin, profilins I, II, and cofilin jointly decreased. The localization data and concurrent losses of profilins and cofilin with actin from phagosomes are consistent with the roles of these actin-binding proteins in filament dynamics and indicated that they were involved in regulating the assembly and disassembly of the actin coat of phagosomes.Abbreviations DNase deoxyribonuclease - FITC fluorescein isothiocyanate - NEpHGE nonequilibrium pH gradient gel electrophoresis - SDS-PAGE sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis     

Structure of the actin-depolymerizing factor homology domain in complex with actin

Actin dynamics provide the driving force for many cellular processes including motility and endocytosis. Among the central cytoskeletal regulators are actin-depolymerizing factor (ADF)/cofilin, which depolymerizes actin filaments, and twinfilin, which sequesters actin monomers and caps filament barbed ends. Both interact with actin through an ADF homology (ADF-H) domain, which is also found in several other actin-binding proteins. However, in the absence of an atomic structure for the ADF-H domain in complex with actin, the mechanism by which these proteins interact with actin has remained unknown. Here, we present the crystal structure of twinfilin's C-terminal ADF-H domain in complex with an actin monomer. This domain binds between actin subdomains 1 and 3 through an interface that is conserved among ADF-H domain proteins. Based on this structure, we suggest a mechanism by which ADF/cofilin and twinfilin inhibit nucleotide exchange of actin monomers and present a model for how ADF/cofilin induces filament depolymerization by weakening intrafilament interactions.     

Cooperative regulation of endocytic vesicle transport by yeast Eps15-like protein Pan1p and epsins

Dynamic actin filaments are required for the formation and internalization of endocytic vesicles. Yeast actin cables serve as a track for the translocation of endocytic vesicles to early endosomes, but the molecular mechanisms regulating the interaction between vesicles and the actin cables remain ambiguous. Previous studies have demonstrated that the yeast Eps15-like protein Pan1p plays an important role in this interaction, and that interaction is not completely lost even after deletion of the Pan1p actin-binding domain, suggesting that additional proteins mediate association of the vesicle with the actin cable. Other candidates for mediating the interaction are endocytic coat proteins Sla2p (yeast Hip1R) and Ent1p/2p (yeast epsins), as these proteins can bind to both the plasma membrane and the actin filament. Here, we investigated the degree of redundancy in the actin-binding activities of Pan1p, Sla2p, and Ent1p/2p involved in the internalization and transport of endocytic vesicles. Expression of the nonphosphorylatable form of Pan1p, Pan1-18TA, caused abnormal accumulation of both actin cables and endocytic vesicles, and this accumulation was additively suppressed by deletion of the actin-binding domains of both Pan1p and Ent1p. Interestingly, deletion of the actin-binding domains of Pan1p and Ent1p in cells lacking the ENT2 gene resulted in severely defective internalization of endocytic vesicles and recruitment of actin cables to the site of endocytosis. These results suggest that Pan1p and Ent1p/2p cooperatively regulate the interaction between the endocytic vesicle and the actin cable.     

Structure of macrophage actin-binding protein molecules in solution and interacting with actin filaments

We have examined the structure of actin-binding molecules in solution and interacting with actin filaments. At physiological ionic strength, actin-binding protein has a M_r value of 540 × 10³ as determined by direct and indirect hydrodynamic measurements. It is an asymmetrical dimer composed of 270 × 10³ dalton subunits. Viewed in the electron microscope after negative staining or low angle shadowing, actin-binding protein molecules assume a broad range of conformations varying from closed circular structures to fully extended strands 162 nm in contour length. All configurations are apparently derived from the same structure which consists of two monomer chains connected end-to-end. The radius of gyration determined from the electron microscopic images was 21.3 nm in agreement with the value of 17.6 nm calculated from hydrodynamic assays. The average axial ratio from hydrodynamic measurements was 17:1, whereas fully extended dimer molecules in the electron microscope would have an axial ratio of 54:1. All of these observations indicate that actin-binding protein dimers are extremely flexible. The flexibility parameter λ (Landau &; Lifshits, 1958) for actinbinding protein is 0.18 nm^?1.As determined by sedimentation, actin-binding protein binds to actin filaments with a K_a value of 2 × 10⁶m^?1 and a capacity of one dimer to 14 actin monomers in filaments. After incubation of high concentrations (molar ratio to actin ≥ 1:10) of actin-binding protein with actin filaments, long filament bundles are visible in the electron microscope. Under these conditions, actin-binding protein molecules decorate the actin filaments in the bundles at regular 40 nm intervals or once every 15 monomers, approximately equivalent to the binding capacity measured by sedimentation. Low concentrations of actin-binding protein (molar ratio to actin ≥ 1:50) which promote the gelation of actin filaments in solution, did not detectably alter the isotropy of the actin filaments. Direct visualization of actinbinding protein molecules between actin filaments in the electron microscope showed that dimers are sufficient for crossbridging of actin filaments and that actinbinding protein dimers are bipolar, composed of monomers connected head-to-head and having actin-binding sites located on the free tails.We conclude that actin-binding protein is a dimer at physiological ionic strength. Each dimer has two actin filament binding sites and is therefore sufficient to gel actin filaments in solution. The length and flexibility of the actin-binding protein subunits render this molecule structurally suited for the crosslinking of large helical filaments into isotropic networks.     

Actin organization, bristle morphology, and viability are affected by actin capping protein mutations in Drosophila

Regulation of actin filament length and orientation is important in many actin-based cellular processes. This regulation is postulated to occur through the action of actin-binding proteins. Many actin-binding proteins that modify actin in vitro have been identified, but in many cases, it is not known if this activity is physiologically relevant. Capping protein (CP) is an actin-binding protein that has been demonstrated to control filament length in vitro by binding to the barbed ends and preventing the addition or loss of actin monomers. To examine the in vivo role of CP, we have performed a molecular and genetic characterization of the beta subunit of capping protein from Drosophila melanogaster. We have identified mutations in the Drosophila beta subunit-these are the first CP mutations in a multicellular organism, and unlike CP mutations in yeast, they are lethal, causing death during the early larval stage. Adult files that are heterozygous for a pair of weak alleles have a defect in bristle morphology that is correlated to disorganized actin bundles in developing bristles. Our data demonstrate that CP has an essential function during development, and further suggest that CP is required to regulate actin assembly during the development of specialized structures that depend on actin for their morphology.     

Identification of Arabidopsis cyclase-associated protein 1 as the first nucleotide exchange factor for plant actin

The actin cytoskeleton powers organelle movements, orchestrates responses to abiotic stresses, and generates an amazing array of cell shapes. Underpinning these diverse functions of the actin cytoskeleton are several dozen accessory proteins that coordinate actin filament dynamics and construct higher-order assemblies. Many actin-binding proteins from the plant kingdom have been characterized and their function is often surprisingly distinct from mammalian and fungal counterparts. The adenylyl cyclase-associated protein (CAP) has recently been shown to be an important regulator of actin dynamics in vivo and in vitro. The disruption of actin organization in cap mutant plants indicates defects in actin dynamics or the regulated assembly and disassembly of actin subunits into filaments. Current models for actin dynamics maintain that actin-depolymerizing factor (ADF)/cofilin removes ADP-actin subunits from filament ends and that profilin recharges these monomers with ATP by enhancing nucleotide exchange and delivery of subunits onto filament barbed ends. Plant profilins, however, lack the essential ability to stimulate nucleotide exchange on actin, suggesting that there might be a missing link yet to be discovered from plants. Here, we show that Arabidopsis thaliana CAP1 (AtCAP1) is an abundant cytoplasmic protein; it is present at a 1:3 M ratio with total actin in suspension cells. AtCAP1 has equivalent affinities for ADP- and ATP-monomeric actin (Kd approximately 1.3 microM). Binding of AtCAP1 to ATP-actin monomers inhibits polymerization, consistent with AtCAP1 being an actin sequestering protein. However, we demonstrate that AtCAP1 is the first plant protein to increase the rate of nucleotide exchange on actin. Even in the presence of ADF/cofilin, AtCAP1 can recharge actin monomers and presumably provide a polymerizable pool of subunits to profilin for addition onto filament ends. In turnover assays, plant profilin, ADF, and CAP act cooperatively to promote flux of subunits through actin filament barbed ends. Collectively, these results and our understanding of other actin-binding proteins implicate CAP1 as a central player in regulating the pool of unpolymerized ATP-actin.     

Electron microscopic visualization of the filament binding mode of actin-binding proteins

A large number of actin-binding proteins (ABPs) regulate various kinds of cellular events in which the superstructure of the actin cytoskeleton is dynamically changed. Thus, to understand the actin dynamics in the cell, the mechanisms of actin regulation by ABPs must be elucidated. Moreover, it is particularly important to identify the side, barbed-end or pointed-end ABP binding sites on the actin filament. However, a simple, reliable method to determine the ABP binding sites on the actin filament is missing. Here, a novel electron microscopic method for determining the ABP binding sites is presented. This approach uses a gold nanoparticle that recognizes a histidine tag on an ABP and an image analysis procedure that can determine the polarity of the actin filament. This method will facilitate future study of ABPs.     

Evidence for a Conformational Change in Actin Induced by Fimbrin (N375) Binding

Fimbrin belongs to a superfamily of actin cross-linking proteins that share a conserved 27-kD actin-binding domain. This domain contains a tandem duplication of a sequence that is homologous to calponin. Calponin homology (CH) domains not only cross-link actin filaments into bundles and networks, but they also bind intermediate filaments and some signal transduction proteins to the actin cytoskeleton. This fundamental role of CH domains as a widely used actin-binding domain underlines the necessity to understand their structural interaction with actin. Using electron cryomicroscopy, we have determined the three-dimensional structure of F-actin and F-actin decorated with the NH₂-terminal CH domains of fimbrin (N375). In a difference map between actin filaments and N375-decorated actin, one end of N375 is bound to a concave surface formed between actin subdomains 1 and 2 on two neighboring actin monomers. In addition, a fit of the atomic model for the actin filament to the maps reveals the actin residues that line, the binding surface. The binding of N375 changes actin, which we interpret as a movement of subdomain 1 away from the bound N375. This change in actin structure may affect its affinity for other actin-binding proteins and may be part of the regulation of the cytoskeleton itself. Difference maps between actin and actin decorated with other proteins provides a way to look for novel structural changes in actin.     

Cortactin binding to F-actin revealed by electron microscopy and 3D reconstruction

Cortactin and WASP activate Arp2/3-mediated actin filament nucleation and branching. However, different mechanisms underlie activation by the two proteins, which rely on distinct actin-binding modules and modes of binding to actin filaments. It is generally thought that cortactin binds to "mother" actin filaments, while WASP donates actin monomers to Arp2/3-generated "daughter" filament branches. Interestingly, cortactin also binds WASP in addition to F-actin and the Arp2/3 complex. However, the structural basis for the role of cortactin in filament branching remains unknown, making interpretation difficult. Here, electron microscopy and 3D reconstruction were carried out on F-actin decorated with the actin-binding repeating domain of cortactin, revealing conspicuous density on F-actin attributable to cortactin that is located on a consensus-binding site on subdomain-1 of actin subunits. Strikingly, the binding of cortactin widens the gap between the two long-pitch filament strands. Although other proteins have been found to alter the structure of the filament, the cortactin-induced conformational change appears unique. The results are consistent with a mechanism whereby alterations of the F-actin structure may facilitate recruitment of the Arp2/3 complex to the "mother" filament in the cortex of cells. In addition, cortactin may act as a structural adapter protein, stabilizing nascent filament branches while mediating the simultaneous recruitment of Arp2/3 and WASP.     

Get to grips: steering local actin dynamics with IQGAPs

IQGAPs are actin-binding proteins that scaffold numerous interaction partners, transmitting extracellular signals that influence mitogenic, morphological and migratory cell behaviour. However, the precise mechanisms by which IQGAP proteins influence actin dynamics and actin filament structures have been elusive. Now that IQGAP1 has emerged as a potential key regulator of actin-cytoskeletal dynamics by recruiting both the actin related protein (Arp)2/3 complex and/or formin-dependent actin polymerizing machineries, we propose that IQGAP1 might coordinate the function of mechanistically different actin nucleators for cooperative localized actin filament production in various cellular processes.     

Actin filaments in yeast are unstable in the absence of capping protein or fimbrin

Many actin-binding proteins affect filament assembly in vitro and localize with actin in vivo, but how their molecular actions contribute to filament assembly in vivo is not understood well. We report here that capping protein (CP) and fimbrin are both important for actin filament assembly in vivo in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, based on finding decreased actin filament assembly in CP and fimbrin mutants. We have also identified mutations in actin that enhance the CP phenotype and find that those mutants also have decreased actin filament assembly in vivo. In vitro, actin purified from some of these mutants is defective in polymerization or binding fimbrin. These findings support the conclusion that CP acts to stabilize actin filaments in vivo. This conclusion is particularly remarkable because it is the opposite of the conclusion drawn from recent studies in Dictyostelium (Hug, C., P.Y. Jay, I. Reddy, J.G. McNally, P.C. Bridgman, E.L. Elson, and J.A. Cooper. 1995. Cell. 81:591-600). In addition, we find that the unpolymerized pool of actin in yeast is very small relative to that found in higher cells, which suggests that actin filament assembly is less dynamic in yeast than higher cells.