Early mouse embryo development: could epigenetics influence cell fate determination?

It is generally assumed that the developmental program of embryogenesis relies on epigenetic mechanisms. However, a mechanistic link between epigenetic marks and cell fate decisions had not been established so far. In a recent article, Torres-Padilla and colleagues show that epigenetic information and, more precisely, histone arginine methylation mediated by CARM1 could contribute to cell fate decisions in the mouse 4-cell-stage embryo. It provides the first indications that global epigenetic information influences allocation of pluripotent cells toward the first cell lineages.     

Mammalian aPKC/Par polarity complex mediated regulation of epithelial division orientation and cell fate

Oriented cell division is a key regulator of tissue architecture and crucial for morphogenesis and homeostasis. Balanced regulation of proliferation and differentiation is an essential property of tissues not only to drive morphogenesis but also to maintain and restore homeostasis. In many tissues orientation of cell division is coupled to the regulation of differentiation producing daughters with similar (symmetric cell division, SCD) or differential fate (asymmetric cell division, ACD). This allows the organism to generate cell lineage diversity from a small pool of stem and progenitor cells. Division orientation and/or the ratio of ACD/SCD need to be tightly controlled. Loss of orientation or an altered ratio can promote overgrowth, alter tissue architecture and induce aberrant differentiation, and have been linked to morphogenetic diseases, cancer and aging. A key requirement for oriented division is the presence of a polarity axis, which can be established through cell intrinsic and/or extrinsic signals. Polarity proteins translate such internal and external cues to drive polarization. In this review we will focus on the role of the polarity complex aPKC/Par3/Par6 in the regulation of division orientation and cell fate in different mammalian epithelia. We will compare the conserved function of this complex in mitotic spindle orientation and distribution of cell fate determinants and highlight common and differential mechanisms in which this complex is used by tissues to adapt division orientation and cell fate to the specific properties of the epithelium.     

Cell memory of epithelial-mesenchymal plasticity in cancer

Fundamental biological processes of cell identity and cell fate determination are controlled by complex regulatory networks. These processes require molecular mechanisms that confer cellular phenotypic memory and state persistence. In this minireview, we will summarize mechanisms of cell memory based on regulatory hysteretic feedback loops and explore epigenetic mechanisms widely represented in nature, with special focus on epithelial-to-mesenchymal plasticity. We will also discuss the functional consequences of cell memory and epithelial-to-mesenchymal plasticity dynamics during development and cancer metastasis.     

Epigenetic programming: from gametes to blastocyst

Embryo development requires a series of cell fate decisions; cell lineages are established early during development and must be "remembered" through multiple cell divisions. It is increasingly evident that epigenetic marks, DNA methylation, histone modifications, and noncoding RNAs, have a critical role in this cell memory during development. During gametogenesis, epigenetic programming results in the production of spermatozoa and oocytes with distinctive chromatin. The goal of this article is to review what is known about the epigenetic marks in mature gametes and how these marks change during early embryo development. An understanding of the role of epigenetic programming during normal development will lay the basis for the elucidation of its role when development goes awry and the consequence is a birth defect.     

Cellular identity and lineage choice

In multicellular organisms, cells usually respond to signals that they encounter in a manner that depends on their particular lineage 'identity'. In other words, cells that have identical genomes can respond in markedly different ways to the same stimulus, with the outcome being determined largely by the previous developmental history of the cell. This general observation implies that individual somatic cells retain a 'working memory' of their ancestry and that this epigenetic information can be passed through successive rounds of DNA replication and cell division. Here, I discuss whether recent advances in our knowledge of chromatin biology and gene silencing can provide new insights into how cell fate is chosen and maintained during development.     

Smoothened, thickveins and the genetic control of cell cycle and cell fate in the developing Drosophila eye

The Hedgehog and Decapentaplegic pathways have several well-characterized functions in the developing Drosophila compound eye, including initiation and progression of the morphogenetic furrow. Other functions involve control of cell cycle and cell survival as well as cell type specification. Here we have used the mosaic clone analysis of null mutations of the smoothened and thickveins genes (which encode the receptors for these two signals) both alone and in combination, to study cell cycle and cell fate in the developing eye. We conclude that both pathways have several, but differing roles in furrow induction and cell fate and survival, but that neither directly affects cell type specification.     

The role of mechanical signals in regulating chondrogenesis and osteogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells

It is becoming increasingly clear that mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) differentiation is regulated by mechanical signals. Mechanical forces generated intrinsically within the cell in response to its extracellular environment, and extrinsic mechanical signals imposed upon the cell by the extracellular environment, play a central role in determining MSC fate. This article reviews chondrogenesis and osteogenesis during skeletogenesis, and then considers the role of mechanics in regulating limb development and regenerative events such as fracture repair. However, observing skeletal changes under altered loading conditions can only partially explain the role of mechanics in controlling MSC differentiation. Increasingly, understanding how epigenetic factors, such as the mechanical environment, regulate stem cell fate is undertaken using tightly controlled in vitro models. Factors such as bioengineered surfaces, substrates, and bioreactor systems are used to control the mechanical forces imposed upon, and generated within, MSCs. From these studies, a clearer picture of how osteogenesis and chondrogenesis of MSCs is regulated by mechanical signals is beginning to emerge. Understanding the response of MSCs to such regulatory factors is a key step towards understanding their role in development, disease and regeneration. Birth Defects Research (Part C) 90:75–85, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Genomic imprinting and epigenetic control of development

Epigenetic mechanisms are extensively utilized during mammalian development. Specific patterns of gene expression are established during cell fate decisions, maintained as differentiation progresses, and often augmented as more specialized cell types are required. Much of what is known about these mechanisms comes from the study of two distinct epigenetic phenomena: genomic imprinting and X-chromosome inactivation. In the case of genomic imprinting, alleles are expressed in a parent-of-origin-dependent manner, whereas X-chromosome inactivation in females requires that only one X chromosome is active in each somatic nucleus. As model systems for epigenetic regulation, genomic imprinting and X-chromosome inactivation have identified and elucidated the numerous regulatory mechanisms that function throughout the genome during development.