G-protein coupled receptor agonists mediate Neu1 sialidase and matrix metalloproteinase-9 cross-talk to induce transactivation of TOLL-like receptors and cellular signaling

The mechanism(s) behind GPCR transactivation of TLR receptors independent of TLR ligands is unknown. Here, GPCR agonists bombesin, bradykinin, lysophosphatidic acid (LPA), cholesterol, angiotensin-1 and -2, but not thrombin induce Neu1 activity in live macrophage cell lines and primary bone marrow macrophage cells from wild-type (WT) mice but not from Neu1-deficient mice. Using immunocytochemistry and NFκB-dependent secretory alkaline phosphatase (SEAP) analyses, bombesin induced NFκB activation in BMC-2 and RAW-blue macrophage cells, which was inhibited by MyD88 homodimerization inhibitor, Tamiflu, galardin, piperazine and anti-MMP-9 antibody. Bombesin receptor, neuromedin B (NMBR), forms a complex with TLR4 and MMP9. Silencing MMP9 mRNA using siRNA transfection of RAW-blue macrophage cells markedly reduced Neu1 activity associated with bombesin-, bradykinin- and LPA-treated cells to the untreated controls. These findings uncover a molecular organizational GPCR signaling platform to potentiate Neu1 and MMP-9 cross-talk on the cell surface that is essential for the transactivation of TLR receptors and subsequent cellular signaling.     

Signal characteristics of G protein-transactivated EGF receptor.

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase recently was identified as providing a link to mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) in response to G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) agonists in Rat-1 fibroblasts. This cross-talk pathway is also established in other cell types such as HaCaT keratinocytes, primary mouse astrocytes and COS-7 cells. Transient expression of either Gq- or Gi-coupled receptors in COS-7 cells allowed GPCR agonist-induced EGFR transactivation, and lysophosphatidic acid (LPA)-generated signals involved the docking protein Gab1. The increase in SHC tyrosine phosphorylation and MAPK stimulation through both Gq- and Gi-coupled receptors was reduced strongly upon selective inhibition of EGFR function. Inhibition of phosphoinositide 3-kinase did not affect GPCR-induced stimulation of EGFR tyrosine phosphorylation, but inhibited MAPK stimulation, upon treatment with both GPCR agonists and low doses of EGF. Furthermore, the Src tyrosine kinase inhibitor PP1 strongly interfered with LPA- and EGF-induced tyrosine phosphorylation and MAPK activation downstream of EGFR. Our results demonstrate an essential role for EGFR function in signaling through both Gq- and Gi-coupled receptors and provide novel insights into signal transmission downstream of EGFR for efficient activation of the Ras/MAPK pathway.     

Role of receptor transactivation in the cardioprotective effects of preconditioning and postconditioning

Analysis of published data indicates that the activity of receptors for adenosine, opioids, bradykinin, calcitonin-gene related peptides (CGRP) and epidermal growth factor (EGF) play important role in triggering the cardioprotective effects of ischemic preconditioning. Cannabinoids mimic the infarct-sparing effects of preconditioning. Endogenous adenosine, opioids, bradykinin and CGRP have also been implicated in infarct-reduction with ischemic postconditioning. Again, cannabinoids also mimic the protective effect of postconditioning. Recent works support heterodimerization of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), and GPCR transactivation of EGF receptors. It was found that cross-talk between delta(j)-opioid receptors and adenosine A(1)-receptors is essential to cardiac protection. Furthermore, evidence implicates EGF receptor transactivation in cardioprotective effect of multiple GPCrs including adenosine, acetylcholine, bradykinin, and opioid receptors. Such findings support a convergent pathway in which multiple GPCRs may interact (or function independently) to transactivate EGF receptor-dependent kinase signaling and cytoprotection.     

Reactive oxygen species mediate Met receptor transactivation by G protein-coupled receptors and the epidermal growth factor receptor in human carcinoma cells

Cross-communication between the Met receptor tyrosine kinase and the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has been proposed to involve direct association of both receptors and EGFR kinase-dependent phosphorylation. Here, we demonstrate that in human hepatocellular and pancreatic carcinoma cells the Met receptor becomes tyrosine phosphorylated not only upon EGF stimulation but also in response to G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) agonists. Whereas specific inhibition of the EGFR kinase activity blocked EGF- but not GPCR agonist-induced Met receptor transactivation, it was abrogated in the presence of a reducing agent or treatment of cells with a NADPH oxidase inhibitor. Both GPCR ligands and EGF are further shown to increase the level of reactive oxygen species within the cell. Interestingly, stimulation of the Met receptor by either GPCR agonists, EGF or its cognate ligand HGF, resulted in release of Met-associated beta-catenin and in its Met-dependent translocation into the nucleus, as analyzed by small interfering RNA-mediated knockdown of the Met receptor. Our results provide a new molecular explanation for cell surface receptor cross-talk involving the Met receptor and thereby link the wide diversity of GPCRs and the EGFR to the oncogenic potential of Met signaling in human carcinoma cells.     

NADPH-oxidase-dependent reactive oxygen species mediate EGFR transactivation by FPRL1 in WKYMVm-stimulated human lung cancer cells

Cross talk between unrelated cell surface receptors, such as G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) and receptor tyrosine kinases (RTK), is a crucial signaling mechanism to expand the cellular communication network. We investigated the ability of the GPCR formyl peptide receptor-like 1 (FPRL1) to transactivate the RTK epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in CaLu-6 cells. We observed that stimulation with WKYMVm, an FPRL1 agonist isolated by screening synthetic peptide libraries, induces EGFR tyrosine phosphorylation, p47^phox phosphorylation, NADPH-oxidase-dependent superoxide generation, and c-Src kinase activity. As a result of EGFR transactivation, phosphotyrosine residues provide docking sites for recruitment and triggering of the STAT3 pathway. WKYMVm-induced EGFR transactivation is prevented by the FPRL1-selective antagonist WRWWWW, by pertussis toxin (PTX), and by the c-Src inhibitor PP2. The critical role of NADPH-oxidase-dependent superoxide generation in this cross-talk mechanism is corroborated by the finding that apocynin or a siRNA against p22^phox prevents EGFR transactivation and c-Src kinase activity. In addition, WKYMVm promotes CaLu-6 cell growth, which is prevented by PTX and by WRWWWW. These results highlight the role of FPRL1 as a potential target of new drugs and suggest that targeting both FPRL1 and EGFR may yield superior therapeutic effects compared with targeting either receptor separately.     

Neu1 sialidase and matrix metalloproteinase-9 cross-talk regulates nucleic acid-induced endosomal TOLL-like receptor-7 and -9 activation,cellular signaling and pro-inflammatory responses

The precise mechanism(s) by which intracellular TOLL-like receptors (TLRs) become activated by their ligands remains unclear. Here, we report a molecular organizational G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling platform to potentiate a novel mammalian neuraminidase-1 (Neu1) and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) cross-talk in alliance with neuromedin B GPCR, all of which form a tripartite complex with TLR-7 and -9. siRNA silencing Neu1, MMP-9 and neuromedin-B GPCR in RAW-blue macrophage cells significantly reduced TLR7 imiquimod- and TLR9 ODN1826-induced NF-κB (NF-κB-pSer⁵³⁶) activity. Tamiflu, specific MMP-9 inhibitor, neuromedin B receptor specific antagonist BIM23127, and the selective inhibitor of whole heterotrimeric G-protein complex BIM-46174 significantly block nucleic acid-induced TLR-7 and -9 MyD88 recruitment, NF-κB activation and proinflammatory TNFα and MCP-1 cytokine responses. For the first time, Neu1 clearly plays a central role in mediating nucleic acid-induced intracellular TLR activation, and the interactions involving NMBR–MMP9–Neu1 cross-talk constitute a novel intracellular TLR signaling platform that is essential for NF-κB activation and pro-inflammatory responses.     

Functional Consequences of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Cross-talk and Trafficking

The signaling capacity of seven-transmembrane/G-protein-coupled receptors (7TM/GPCRs) can be regulated through ligand-mediated receptor trafficking. Classically, the recycling of internalized receptors is associated with resensitization, whereas receptor degradation terminates signaling. We have shown previously that the incretin glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) internalizes fast and is primarily resensitized through recycling back to the cell surface. GLP-1R is expressed in pancreatic islets together with the closely related glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIPR) and glucagon (GCGR) receptors. The interaction and cross-talk between coexpressed receptors is a wide phenomenon of the 7TM/GPCR superfamily. Numerous reports show functional consequences for signaling and trafficking of the involved receptors. On the basis of the high structural similarity and tissue coexpression, we here investigated the potential cross-talk between GLP-1R and GIPR or GCGR in both trafficking and signaling pathways. Using a real-time time-resolved FRET-based internalization assay, we show that GLP-1R, GIPR, and GCGR internalize with differential properties. Remarkably, upon coexpression of the internalizing GLP-1R and the non-internalizing GIPR, GLP-1-mediated GLP-1R internalization was impaired in a GIPR concentration-dependent manner. As a functional consequence of such impaired internalization capability, GLP-1-mediated GLP-1R signaling was abrogated. A similar compromised signaling was found when GLP-1R internalization was abrogated by a dominant-negative version of dynamin (dynamin-1 K44E), which provides a mechanistic link between GLP-1R trafficking and signaling. This study highlights the importance of receptor internalization for full functionality of GLP-1R. Moreover, cross-talk between the two incretin receptors GLP-1R and GIPR is shown to alter receptor trafficking with functional consequences for GLP-1R signaling.     

Distinctive features of Trk neurotrophin receptor transactivation by G protein-coupled receptors.

Ligands for G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) are capable of activating mitogenic receptor tyrosine kinases, in addition to the mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase signaling pathway and classic G protein-dependent signaling pathways involving adenylyl cyclase and phospholipase. For example, receptors for epidermal growth factor (EGF), insulin-like growth-1 and platelet-derived growth factor and can be transactivated through G protein-coupled receptors. Neurotrophins, such as NGF, BDNF and NT-3 also utilize receptor tyrosine kinases, namely TrkA, TrkB and TrkC. Recently, it has been shown that activation of Trk receptor tyrosine kinases can also occur via a G protein-coupled receptor mechanism, without involvement of neurotrophins. Adenosine and adenosine agonists can activate Trk receptor phosphorylation specifically through the seven transmembrane spanning adenosine 2A (A2A) receptor. Several features of Trk receptor transactivation are noteworthy and differ significantly from other transactivation events. Trk receptor transactivation is slower and results in a selective increase in activated Akt. Unlike the biological actions of other tyrosine kinase receptors, increased Trk receptor activity by adenosine resulted in increased cell survival. This article will discuss potential mechanisms by which adenosine can activate trophic responses through Trk tyrosine kinase receptors.     

The beta(2)-adrenergic receptor mediates extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation via assembly of a multi-receptor complex with the epidermal growth factor receptor

Many G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) activate MAP kinases by stimulating tyrosine kinase signaling cascades. In some systems, GPCRs stimulate tyrosine phosphorylation by inducing the "transactivation" of a receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK). The mechanisms underlying GPCR-induced RTK transactivation have not been clearly defined. Here we report that GPCR activation mimics growth factor-mediated stimulation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) with respect to many facets of RTK function. beta(2)-Adrenergic receptor (beta(2)AR) stimulation of COS-7 cells induces EGFR dimerization, tyrosine autophosphorylation, and EGFR internalization. Coincident with EGFR transactivation, isoproterenol exposure induces the formation of a multireceptor complex containing both the beta(2)AR and the "transactivated" EGFR. beta(2)AR-mediated EGFR phosphorylation and subsequent beta(2)AR stimulation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) 1/2 are sensitive to selective inhibitors of both EGFR and Src kinases, indicating that both kinases are required for EGFR transactivation. beta(2)AR-dependent signaling to ERK1/2, like direct EGF stimulation of ERK1/2 activity, is sensitive to inhibitors of clathrin-mediated endocytosis, suggesting that signaling downstream of both the EGF-activated and the GPCR-transactivated EGFRs requires a productive engagement of the complex with the cellular endocytic machinery. Thus, RTK transactivation is revealed to be a process involving both association of receptors of distinct classes and the interaction of the transactivated RTK with the cells endocytic machinery.     

Distinct ADAM metalloproteinases regulate G protein-coupled receptor-induced cell proliferation and survival

Cross-talk between G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling systems is widely established in a variety of normal and transformed cell types. Here, we demonstrate that the EGFR transactivation signal requires metalloproteinase cleavage of epidermal growth factor-like growth factor precursors in fibroblasts, ACHN kidney, and TccSup bladder carcinoma cells. Furthermore, we present evidence that blockade of the metalloproteinase-disintegrin tumor necrosis factor-alpha-converting enzyme (TACE/ADAM17) by a dominant negative ADAM17 mutant prevents angiotensin II-stimulated pro-HB-EGF cleavage, EGFR activation, and cell proliferation in ACHN tumor cells. Moreover, we found that in TccSup cancer cells, the lysophosphatidic acid-induced transactivation signal is mediated by ADAM15, demonstrating that distinct combinations of growth factor precursors and ADAMs (a disintegrin and metalloproteinases) regulate GPCR-EGFR cross-talk pathways in cell lines derived from urogenital cancer. Our data show further that activation of ADAMs results in discrete cellular responses; whereas GPCR agonists promote activation of the Ras/MAPK pathway and cell proliferation via the EGFR in fibroblasts and ACHN cells, EGFR transactivation pathways regulate activation of the survival mediator Akt/protein kinase B and the susceptibility of fibroblasts and TccSup bladder carcinoma cells to proapoptotic signals such as serum deprivation, death receptor stimulation, and the chemotherapeutic drug doxorubicin. Thus, ADAM15 and -17 function as effectors of GPCR-mediated signaling and define critical characteristics of cancer cells.     

An activity-based probe reveals dynamic protein-protein interactions mediating IGF-1R transactivation by the GABA(B) receptor

Many GPCRs (G-protein-coupled receptors) can activate RTKs (receptor tyrosine kinases) in the absence of RTK ligands, a phenomenon called transactivation. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms remain undefined. In the present study we investigate the molecular basis of GABA(B) (γ-aminobutyric acid B) receptor-mediated transactivation of IGF-1R (insulin-like growth factor type I receptor) in primary neurons. We take a chemical biology approach by developing an activity-based probe targeting the GABA(B) receptor. This probe enables us first to lock the GABA(B) receptor in an inactive state and then activate it with a positive allosteric modulator, thereby permitting monitoring of the dynamic of the protein complex associated with IGF-1R transactivation. We find that activation of the GABA(B) receptor induces a dynamic assembly and disassembly of a protein complex, including both receptors and their downstream effectors. FAK (focal adhesion kinase), a non-RTK, plays a key role in co-ordinating this dynamic process. Importantly, this dynamic of the GABA(B) receptor-associated complex is critical for transactivation and transactivation-dependent neuronal survival. The present study has identified an important mechanism underlying GPCR transactivation of RTKs, which was enabled by a new chemical biology tool generally applicable for dissecting GPCR signalling.     

Thrombospondin-1 and CD47 regulation of cardiac,pulmonary and vascular responses in health and disease

Cardiovascular homeostasis and health is maintained through the balanced interactions of cardiac generated blood flow and cross-talk between the cellular components that comprise blood vessels. Central to this cross-talk is endothelial generated nitric oxide (NO) that stimulates relaxation of the contractile vascular smooth muscle (VSMC) layer of blood vessels. In cardiovascular disease this balanced interaction is disrupted and NO signaling is lost. Work over the last several years indicates that regulation of NO is much more complex than previously believed. It is now apparent that the secreted protein thrombospondin-1 (TSP1), that is upregulated in cardiovascular disease and animal models of the same, on activating cell surface receptor CD47, redundantly inhibits NO production and NO signaling. This inhibitory event has implications for baseline and disease-related responses mediated by NO. Further work has identified that TSP1-CD47 signaling stimulates enzymatic reactive oxygen species (ROS) production to further limit blood flow and promote vascular disease. Herein consideration is given to the most recent discoveries in this regard which identify the TSP1-CD47 axis as a major proximate governor of cardiovascular health.     

Modulation of polycystic kidney disease by G-protein coupled receptors and cyclic AMP signaling

Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease (ADPKD) is a systemic disorder associated with polycystic liver disease (PLD) and other extrarenal manifestations, the most common monogenic cause of end-stage kidney disease, and a major burden for public health. Many studies have shown that alterations in G-protein and cAMP signaling play a central role in its pathogenesis. As for many other diseases (35% of all approved drugs target G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) or proteins functioning upstream or downstream from GPCRs), treatments targeting GPCR have shown effectiveness in slowing the rate of progression of ADPKD. Tolvaptan, a vasopressin V2 receptor antagonist is the first drug approved by regulatory agencies to treat rapidly progressive ADPKD. Long-acting somatostatin analogs have also been effective in slowing the rates of growth of polycystic kidneys and liver. Although no treatment has so far been able to prevent the development or stop the progression of the disease, these encouraging advances point to G-protein and cAMP signaling as a promising avenue of investigation that may lead to more effective and safe treatments. This will require a better understanding of the relevant GPCRs, G-proteins, cAMP effectors, and of the enzymes and A-kinase anchoring proteins controlling the compartmentalization of cAMP signaling. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of general GPCR signaling; the function of polycystin-1 (PC1) as a putative atypical adhesion GPCR (aGPCR); the roles of PC1, polycystin-2 (PC2) and the PC1-PC2 complex in the regulation of calcium and cAMP signaling; the cross-talk of calcium and cAMP signaling in PKD; and GPCRs, adenylyl cyclases, cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases, and protein kinase A as therapeutic targets in ADPKD.     

The changing world of G protein-coupled receptors: from monomers to dimers and receptor mosaics with allosteric receptor–receptor interactions

Based on indications of direct physical interactions between neuropeptide and monoamine receptors in the early 1980s, the term receptor–receptor interactions was introduced and later on the term receptor heteromerization in the early 1990s. Allosteric mechanisms allow an integrative activity to emerge either intramolecularly in G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) monomers or intermolecularly via receptor–receptor interactions in GPCR homodimers, heterodimers, and receptor mosaics. Stable heteromers of Class A receptors may be formed that involve strong high energy arginine–phosphate electrostatic interactions. These receptor–receptor interactions markedly increase the repertoire of GPCR recognition, signaling and trafficking in which the minimal signaling unit in the GPCR homomers appears to be one receptor and one G protein. GPCR homomers and GPCR assemblies are not isolated but also directly interact with other proteins to form horizontal molecular networks at the plasma membrane.     

G蛋白偶联受体激酶的调控

G蛋白偶联受体激酶(G protein-coupled receptor kinase,GRK)特异地使活化的G蛋白偶联受体(G protein-coupled receptor,GPCR)发生磷酸化及脱敏化,从而终止后者介导的信号转导通路。研究表明,GRK的功能被高度调控,并具有下行调节GPCR的能力。调控GRK功能的机制包括两个层次：(1)多种途径调控激酶的亚细胞定位及活性,包括GPCR介导、G蛋白偶联、磷脂作用、Ca^2 结合蛋白调控、蛋白激酶C活化、MAPK反馈抑制、小窝蛋白抑制等;(2)调控GRK表达水平,主要体现在其与某些疾病的联系。     

Insights into cellular signalling by G protein coupled receptor transactivation of cell surface protein kinase receptors

G protein coupled receptor (GPCR) signalling is mediated by transactivation independent and transactivation dependent pathways. GPCRs transactivate protein tyrosine kinase receptors (PTKRs) and protein serine/threonine kinase receptors (PS/TKR). Since the initial observations of transactivation dependent signalling, there has been an effort to understand the mechanisms behind this phenomena. GPCR signalling has evolved to include biased signalling. Biased signalling, whereby selected ligands can activate the same GPCR that can generate multiple signals, but drive only a unique response. To date, there has been no focus on the ability of biased agonists to activate the PTKR and PS/TKR transactivation pathways differentially. As such, this represents a novel direction for future research. This review will discuss the main mechanisms of GPCR mediated receptor transactivation and the pathways involved in intracellular responses.     

Constraints on GPCR Heterodimerization Revealed by the Type-4 Induced-Association BRET Assay

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) comprise the largest and most pharmacologically important family of cell-surface receptors encoded by the human genome. In many instances, the distinct signaling behavior of certain GPCRs has been explained in terms of the formation of heteromers with, for example, distinct signaling properties and allosteric cross-regulation. Confirmation of this has, however, been limited by the paucity of reliable methods for probing heteromeric GPCR interactions in situ. The most widely used assays for GPCR stoichiometry, based on resonance energy transfer, are unsuited to reporting heteromeric interactions. Here, we describe a targeted bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) assay, called type-4 BRET, which detects both homo- and heteromeric interactions using induced multimerization of protomers within such complexes, at constant expression. Using type-4 BRET assays, we investigate heterodimerization among known GPCR homodimers: the CXC chemokine receptor 4 and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptors. We observe that CXC chemokine receptor 4 and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptors can form heterodimers with GPCRs from their immediate subfamilies but not with more distantly related receptors. We also show that heterodimerization appears to disrupt homodimeric interactions, suggesting the sharing of interfaces. Broadly, these observations indicate that heterodimerization results from the divergence of homodimeric receptors and will therefore likely be restricted to closely related homodimeric GPCRs.     

5-HT1A receptors transactivate the platelet-derived growth factor receptor type beta in neuronal cells

In the absence of ligand, certain growth factor receptors can be activated via G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) activation in a process termed transactivation. Serotonin (5-HT) receptors can transactivate platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) β receptors in smooth muscle cells, but it is not known if similar pathways occur in neuronal cells. Here we show that 5-HT can transiently increase the phosphorylation of PDGFβ receptors through 5-HT_1A receptors in a time- and dose-dependent manner in SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells. 5-HT also transactivates PDGFβ receptors in primary cortical neurons. This transactivation pathway is pertussis-toxin sensitive and Src tyrosine kinase-dependent. This pathway is also dependent on phospholipase C activity and intracellular calcium signaling. Several studies involving PDGFβ receptor transactivation by GPCRs have also demonstrated a PDGFβ receptor-dependent increase in the phosphorylation of ERK1/2. Yet in SH-SY5Y cells, 5-HT treatment causes a PDGFβ receptor-independent increase in ERK1/2 phosphorylation. This crosstalk between 5-HT and PDGFβ receptors identifies a potentially important signaling link between the serotonergic system and growth factor signaling in neurons.     

Cross-talk at the crossroads of sphingosine-1-phosphate, growth factors, and cytokine signaling

Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) is a bioactive sphingolipid that mediates a wide array of biologic effects through its interaction with a family of five G protein-coupled receptors. Cytokines and growth factors interact with this signaling pathway in a variety of ways, including both activation and regulation of the expression of the enzymes that regulate synthesis and degradation of S1P. Not only do many growth factors and cytokines stimulate S1P production, leading to transactivation of S1P receptors, ligation of S1P receptors by S1P can also transactivate growth factor tyrosine kinase receptors and stimulate growth factor and cytokine signaling cascades. This review discusses the mechanisms involved in cross-talk between S1P, cytokines, and growth factors and the impact of that cross-talk on cell signaling and cell biology.