Genome-wide survey of prokaryotic O-protein phosphatases

Complex and diverse signal transduction circuits are responsible for the efficient functioning of cellular network. Protein kinases and O-protein phosphatases are primarily responsible for propagating such stimuli within a eukaryotic cell. However, there is limited understanding of O-protein phosphatases in the prokaryotic genomes. The availability of complete genome sequence information for several prokaryotes permits a genome-wide survey of O-protein phosphatases. The distribution of the various protein phosphatase families has been observed to be mosaic, with the exception of the members of the phospho protein family P (PPP), which is consistent with previous studies. The PPP family is ubiquitous in the prokaryotic world and undergoes the highest sequence divergence within a genome amongst phosphatases studied. The co-occurrence of low molecular mass tyrosine phosphatase (LMWPc) and PPP domain in a single polypeptide suggests that the protein present in Archaeoglobus fulgidus might represent the progenitor for all protein phosphatases. The curation of data on prokaryotic protein phosphatases provides a convenient framework for the analysis of domain architectures and for characterising structural and functional properties of this important family of signalling proteins.     

Domain architectural census of eukaryotic gene products containing O-protein phosphatases

Intricate molecular signalling within cellular environment is manifested through phosphorylation of proteins. Regulation of the phosphorylation state is executed through complex networking among kinases and their biochemical antagonists, the protein phosphatases. Protein dephosphorylation in eukaryotic systems is largely performed through four structurally distinct Ser/Thr and Tyr O-protein phosphatase superfamilies. 555 O-protein phosphatases, belonging to the four distinct families, could be identified using sensitive sequence search techniques across five eukaryotic model organisms (yeast, fly, worm, mouse and humans). These phosphatases could be grouped into 49 subfamilies associated with distinct domain architecture and discrete biochemical function. Only five of the architectures are shared across the five eukaryotic genomes. Interestingly, the number of occurrence of tyrosine phosphatases is correlated to the complexity of the genome. Analysis of domain architectures suggests amenability of the tyrosine phosphatases to occur in complex architectures unlike Ser/Thr phosphatases. Domain duplication and shuffling is shown as the customary mechanism for the evolution of the phosphatases. Several architectures are common between humans and other genomes, which are probably non-linearly inherited in humans or specifically lost in several others.     

Evolutionary radiation pattern of novel protein phosphatases revealed by analysis of protein data from the completely sequenced genomes of humans, green algae, and higher plants

In addition to the major serine/threonine-specific phosphoprotein phosphatase, Mg(2+)-dependent phosphoprotein phosphatase, and protein tyrosine phosphatase families, there are novel protein phosphatases, including enzymes with aspartic acid-based catalysis and subfamilies of protein tyrosine phosphatases, whose evolutionary history and representation in plants is poorly characterized. We have searched the protein data sets encoded by the well-finished nuclear genomes of the higher plants Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and Oryza sativa, and the latest draft data sets from the tree Populus trichocarpa and the green algae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii and Ostreococcus tauri, for homologs to several classes of novel protein phosphatases. The Arabidopsis proteins, in combination with previously published data, provide a complete inventory of known types of protein phosphatases in this organism. Phylogenetic analysis of these proteins reveals a pattern of evolution where a diverse set of protein phosphatases was present early in the history of eukaryotes, and the division of plant and animal evolution resulted in two distinct sets of protein phosphatases. The green algae occupy an intermediate position, and show similarity to both plants and animals, depending on the protein. Of specific interest are the lack of cell division cycle (CDC) phosphatases CDC25 and CDC14, and the seeming adaptation of CDC14 as a protein interaction domain in higher plants. In addition, there is a dramatic increase in proteins containing RNA polymerase C-terminal domain phosphatase-like catalytic domains in the higher plants. Expression analysis of Arabidopsis phosphatase genes differentially amplified in plants (specifically the C-terminal domain phosphatase-like phosphatases) shows patterns of tissue-specific expression with a statistically significant number of correlated genes encoding putative signal transduction proteins.     

The complement of protein phosphatase catalytic subunits encoded in the genome of Arabidopsis

Reversible protein phosphorylation is critically important in the modulation of a wide variety of cellular functions. Several families of protein phosphatases remove phosphate groups placed on key cellular proteins by protein kinases. The complete genomic sequence of the model plant Arabidopsis permits a comprehensive survey of the phosphatases encoded by this organism. Several errors in the sequencing project gene models were found via analysis of predicted phosphatase coding sequences. Structural sequence probes from aligned and unaligned sequence models, and all-against-all BLAST searches, were used to identify 112 phosphatase catalytic subunit sequences, distributed among the serine (Ser)/threonine (Thr) phosphatases (STs) of the protein phosphatase P (PPP) family, STs of the protein phosphatase M (PPM) family (protein phosphatases 2C [PP2Cs] subfamily), protein tyrosine (Tyr) phosphatases (PTPs), low-M(r) protein Tyr phosphatases, and dual-specificity (Tyr and Ser/Thr) phosphatases (DSPs). The Arabidopsis genome contains an abundance of PP2Cs (69) and a dearth of PTPs (one). Eight sequences were identified as new protein phosphatase candidates: five dual-specificity phosphatases and three PP2Cs. We used phylogenetic analyses to infer clustering patterns reflecting sequence similarity and evolutionary ancestry. These clusters, particularly for the largely unexplored PP2C set, will be a rich source of material for plant biologists, allowing the systematic sampling of protein function by genetic and biochemical means.     

Functional assignment of MAPK phosphatase domains

Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways are well conserved in most organisms, from yeast to humans. The principal components of these pathways are MAP kinases whose activity is regulated by phosphorylation, implicating various MAPK protein effectors-in particular, protein phosphatases that inactivate MAPKs by dephosphorylation. The molecular basis of binding specificity of such regulatory phosphatases to MAPKs is poorly understood. To try to pinpoint potential functional regions within the sequences and to help identify new family members, we have applied a multimotif pattern-recognition approach to characterize two MAPK phosphatase subfamilies (tyrosine-specific and dual specificity) that are crucial in the regulation of MAPKs. We built "fingerprints" for these two subfamilies that are unique to, and highly discriminatory for, each group of proteins. The fingerprints were used in a genome-wide screen, identifying more than 80 MAPK phosphatase domains, several of which were in partial sequences or unclassified proteins. We confirmed experimentally that one predicted MAPK phosphatase orthologue in Xenopus binds to ERK1/2, suggesting a role in MAPK signaling and thus supporting our functional predictions. Further analysis, mapping the fingerprints on the three-dimensional structure of MAPK phosphatases, revealed that some of the fingerprint motifs reside in the N-terminal noncatalytic regions coinciding with reported MAPK binding sites, while others lie within the catalytic phosphatase domain. These results also suggest the presence of putative allosteric sites in the catalytic region for modulation of protein-protein interactions, and provide a framework for future experimental validation.     

The Drosophila primo locus encodes two low-molecular-weight tyrosine phosphatases

The fine modulation of tyrosine phosphorylation by protein tyrosine phosphatases and protein tyrosine kinases is a key regulatory mechanism for many cell signaling pathways active during development. In a screen for genes with interesting expression patterns in the developing Drosophila pupal retina, we identified a novel pair of protein tyrosine phosphatases that exhibit an expression pattern suggesting a role in multiple steps of Drosophila neurogenesis. Together, these phosphatases define the primo locus. Their sequence is approx. 50% identical to each other and to low-molecular-weight protein tyrosine phosphatases (LMW-PTPs) identified in other species. Little is understood of the biological role of LMW-PTPs, and the powerful tools available in Drosophila should provide important insight into their role in signaling and development.     

Identification of Protein-Tyrosine Phosphatases in Archaea

Protein-tyrosine dephosphorylation is a major mechanism in cellular regulation. A large number of protein-tyrosine phosphatases is known from Eukarya, and more recently bacterial homologues have also been identified. By employing conserved sequence patterns from both eukaryotic and bacterial protein-tyrosine phosphatases, we have identified three homologous sequences in two of the four complete archaeal genomes. Two hypothetical open reading frames in the genome of Methanococcus jannaschii (MJ0215 and MJECL20) and one in the genome of Pyrococcus horikoshii (PH1732) clearly bear all the conserved residues of this family. No homologues were found in the genomes of Archaeoglobus fulgidus and Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum. This is the first report of protein-tyrosine phosphatase sequences in Archaea. Received: 29 April 1998 / Accepted: 27 November 1998     

Evolution of the multifunctional protein tyrosine phosphatase family

The protein tyrosine phosphatase (PTP) family plays a central role in signal transduction pathways by controlling the phosphorylation state of serine, threonine, and tyrosine residues. PTPs can be divided into dual specificity phosphatases and the classical PTPs, which can comprise of one or two phosphatase domains. We studied amino acid substitutions at functional sites in the phosphatase domain and identified putative noncatalytic phosphatase domains in all subclasses of the PTP family. The presence of inactive phosphatase domains in all subclasses indicates that they were invented multiple times in evolution. Depending on the domain composition, loss of catalytic activity can result in different consequences for the function of the protein. Inactive single-domain phosphatases can still specifically bind substrate and protect it from dephosphorylation by other phosphatases. The inactive domains of tandem phosphatases can be further subdivided. The first class is more conserved, still able to bind phosphorylated tyrosine residues and might recruit multiphosphorylated substrates for the adjacent active domain. The second has accumulated several variable amino acid substitutions in the catalytic center, indicating a complete loss of tyrosine-binding capabilities. To study the impact of substitutions in the catalytic center to the evolution of the whole domain, we examined the evolutionary rates for each individual site and compared them between the classes. This analysis revealed a release of evolutionary constraint for multiple sites surrounding the catalytic center only in the second class, emphasizing its difference in function compared with the first class. Furthermore, we found a region of higher conservation common to both domain classes, suggesting a new regulatory center. We discuss the influence of evolutionary forces on the development of the phosphatase domain, which has led to additional functions, such as the specific protection of phosphorylated tyrosine residues, substrate recruitment, and regulation of the catalytic activity of adjacent domains.     

The flip side of phospho‐signalling: Regulation of protein dephosphorylation and the protein phosphatase 2Cs

Protein phosphorylation is a key signalling mechanism and has myriad effects on protein function. Phosphorylation by protein kinases can be reversed by protein phosphatases, thus allowing dynamic control of protein phosphorylation. Although this may suggest a straightforward kinase–phosphatase relationship, plant genomes contain five times more kinases than phosphatases. Here, we examine phospho‐signalling from a protein phosphatase centred perspective and ask how relatively few phosphatases regulate many phosphorylation sites. The most abundant class of plant phosphatases, the protein phosphatase 2Cs (PP2Cs), is surrounded by a web of regulation including inhibitor and activator proteins as well as posttranslational modifications that regulate phosphatase activity, control phosphatase stability, or determine the subcellular locations where the phosphatase is present and active. These mechanisms are best established for the Clade A PP2Cs, which are key components of stress and abscisic acid signalling. We also describe other PP2C clades and illustrate how these phosphatases are highly regulated and involved in a wide range of physiological functions. Together, these examples of multiple layers of phosphatase regulation help explain the unbalanced kinase–phosphatase ratio. Continued use of phosphoproteomics to examine phosphatase targets and phosphatase–kinase relationships will be important for deeper understanding of phosphoproteome regulation.     

Protein phosphatases: a genomic outlook to understand their function in plants

Protein phosphatases are the vital regulatory components of various signal transduction pathways in eukaryotes. Signaling pathways triggered during stress and development have been regulated by different classes of protein phosphatases in plants. Recently, genome-wide expressional analysis in Arabidopsis and crop plant such as rice revealed differential expression pattern for several protein phosphatases under different abiotic stresses, in various tissues and at different developmental stages. This expression pattern could be extrapolated to the possible function of protein phosphatases in abiotic stress signaling and tolerance, and during plant development. Here, we discuss organisation and expression patterns of members of the protein phosphatase gene family, and their potential functional role in plants.     

Reversible phosphorylation of histidine residues in vertebrate proteins

Knowledge on kinases and phosphatases acting on serine, threonine and tyrosine residues of vertebrate proteins is huge. These enzymes are still under intensive investigation at present. This is in sharp contrast to what is known about kinases and phosphatases acting on histidine, arginine, lysine and aspartate residues in vertebrate proteins. It also is in contrast to extensive studies of histidine/aspartate phosphorylation in prokaryotes. This minireview briefly summarizes what we have learned about the reversible phosphorylation of histidine residues in mammals. It is described how the field developed during 40 years of science. The article especially highlights the discovery of the first protein histidine phosphatase from vertebrates. Having identified and characterized a protein histidine phosphatase provides at least one desperately required tool to handle and study phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of histidine residues in vertebrates in more detail. Recent evidence even suggests an involvement of histidine phosphorylation in signal transduction.     

Evidence for protein phosphatase 1 and 2A regulation of K+ channels in two types of leaf cells.

Ion channels control ion fluxes across membranes, membrane potential, and signal transduction between and within cells. Protein kinases and phosphatases are important regulators involved in stimulus-response coupling in eukaryotic organisms. We have identified in extracts of Vicia faba leaf cells protein phosphatase activities inhibited by okadaic acid (OA) and calyculin A (CA), two inhibitors of protein phosphatases 1 and 2A. Using whole-cell patch-clamp techniques, we have demonstrated that inward K+ currents in guard cells are inhibited by nanomolar concentrations of OA or CA, whereas outward K+ currents are not affected. However, the same inhibitors enhance the magnitude of outward K+ currents in mesophyll cells. A phosphatase antagonist, adenosine-5'-O-(3-thiotriphosphate), has an effect similar to OA and CA on outward K+ currents in mesophyll cells. Our findings suggest that protein phosphatases 1 and/or 2A play different physiological roles in modulating the activity of K+ channels in mesophyll cells and guard cells.     

Protein tyrosine phosphorylation in streptomycetes

Using phosphotyrosine-specific antibodies, we demonstrate that in several Streptomyces spp. a variety of proteins are phosphorylated on tyrosine residues. Tyrosine phosphorylation was found in a number of Streptomyces species including Streptomyces lividans, Streptomyces hygroscopicus and Streptomyces lavendulae. Each species exhibited a unique pattern of protein tyrosine phosphorylation. Moreover, the patterns of tyrosine phosphorylation varied during the growth phase and were also influenced by culture conditions. We suggest that metabolic shifts during the complex growth cycle of these filamentous bacteria, and possibly secondary metabolic pathways, may be controlled by the action of protein tyrosine kinases and phosphatases, as has been demonstrated in signal transduction pathways in eukaryotic organisms.     

Protein tyrosine phosphatase containing SH2 domains: characterization, preferential expression in hematopoietic cells, and localization to human chromosome 12p12-p13.

Protein tyrosine phosphorylation has been implicated in the growth and functional responses of hematopoietic cells. Recently, approaches have been developed to characterize the protein tyrosine phosphatases that may contribute to regulation of protein tyrosine phosphorylation. One novel protein tyrosine phosphatase was expressed predominantly in hematopoietic cells. Hematopoietic cell phosphatase encodes a 68-kDa protein that contains a single phosphatase conserved domain. Unlike other known protein tyrosine phosphatases, hematopoietic cell phosphatase contains two src homology 2 domains. We also cloned the human homolog, which has 95% amino acid sequence identity. Both the murine and human gene products have tyrosine-specific phosphatase activity, and both are expressed predominantly in hematopoietic cells. Importantly, the human gene maps to chromosome 12 region p12-p13. This region is associated with rearrangements in approximately 10% of cases of acute lymphocytic leukemia in children.     

Differential expression of a novel murine non-receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase during differentiation of P19 embryonal carcinoma cells.

Protein phosphorylation on tyrosine residues is one of the major mechanisms of cell signal transduction and is regulated by protein tyrosine kinases and protein tyrosine phosphatases. Here we report the molecular cloning of an additional member of the protein tyrosine phosphatase-family from differentiated murine P19 embryonal carcinoma cells. This non-receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase, P19-PTP, does not contain regulatory sequences, homologous to the ones found in other non-receptor PTPases. P19-PTP is differentially expressed during in vitro differentiation of P19 EC cells, in that P19-PTP mRNA could only be detected in embryoid bodies, derived from P19 cells.     

Exploiting protein structure data to explore the evolution of protein function and biological complexity

New directions in biology are being driven by the complete sequencing of genomes, which has given us the protein repertoires of diverse organisms from all kingdoms of life. In tandem with this accumulation of sequence data, worldwide structural genomics initiatives, advanced by the development of improved technologies in X-ray crystallography and NMR, are expanding our knowledge of structural families and increasing our fold libraries. Methods for detecting remote sequence similarities have also been made more sensitive and this means that we can map domains from these structural families onto genome sequences to understand how these families are distributed throughout the genomes and reveal how they might influence the functional repertoires and biological complexities of the organisms. We have used robust protocols to assign sequences from completed genomes to domain structures in the CATH database, allowing up to 60% of domain sequences in these genomes, depending on the organism, to be assigned to a domain family of known structure. Analysis of the distribution of these families throughout bacterial genomes identified more than 300 universal families, some of which had expanded significantly in proportion to genome size. These highly expanded families are primarily involved in metabolism and regulation and appear to make major contributions to the functional repertoire and complexity of bacterial organisms. When comparisons are made across all kingdoms of life, we find a smaller set of universal domain families (approx. 140), of which families involved in protein biosynthesis are the largest conserved component. Analysis of the behaviour of other families reveals that some (e.g. those involved in metabolism, regulation) have remained highly innovative during evolution, making it harder to trace their evolutionary ancestry. Structural analyses of metabolic families provide some insights into the mechanisms of functional innovation, which include changes in domain partnerships and significant structural embellishments leading to modulation of active sites and protein interactions.     

Mitotic phosphatases: no longer silent partners

Recent work has highlighted the important role played by protein phosphatase complexes in the regulation of mitosis from yeast to mammals. There have been important advances in defining the roles of the protein serine/threonine phosphatases PP1 and PP2A and the dual specificity protein tyrosine phosphatases CDC25 and Cdc14. Three independent studies defined a regulatory role for PP2A in the control of sister chromatid cohesion, involving a direct interaction with shugoshin. A chromatin targeting subunit has been identified for PP1 and the complex shown to play an essential role in chromosome segregation. Key regulatory residues within CDC25 have been mapped and its activity tied both to the initial activation of cyclin-dependent kinases at the centrosome and to DNA damage checkpoints. Novel roles have been defined for Cdc14, including regulation of rDNA and telomere segregation and participation in spindle assembly. These exciting advances show that protein phosphatases are not merely silent partners to kinases in regulating the control of cell division.     

Prediction of substrate sites for protein phosphatases 1B,SHP-1, and SHP-2 based on sequence features

Tyrosine phosphorylation plays crucial roles in numerous physiological processes. The level of phosphorylation state depends on the combined action of protein tyrosine kinases and protein tyrosine phosphatases. Detection of possible phosphorylation and dephosphorylation sites can provide useful information to the functional studies of relevant proteins. Several studies have focused on the identification of protein tyrosine kinase substrates. However, compared with protein tyrosine kinases, the prediction of protein tyrosine phosphatase substrates involved in the balance of protein phosphorylation level falls behind. This paper described a method that utilized the k-nearest neighbor algorithm to identity the substrate sites of three protein tyrosine phosphatases based on the sequence features of manually collected dephosphorylation sites. In the performance evaluation, both sensitivities and specificities could reach above 75 % for all three protein tyrosine phosphatases. Finally, the method was applied on a set of known tyrosine phosphorylation sites to search for candidate substrates.