Does looping and clustering in the nucleus regulate gene expression?

There has been considerable interest in the way that chromatin is spatially organised within the cell nucleus and how that may relate to gene expression and its control. New molecular techniques have identified looped chromatin domains at the mammalian beta-globin and the Drosophila hsp70 loci. Looped domains may insulate chromatin from the influence of neighbouring domains, and the bases of loops may also act to concentrate proteins locally within the nucleus. The spatial clustering of sequences from the Drosophila bithorax complex, located in trans, has also been demonstrated. An emerging theme is that bringing DNA and proteins together within a defined sub-region of the nuclear volume facilitates both the activation and the repression of gene expression. Nuclear compartments may also be involved in the post-translational modification of proteins by sumoylation and ubiquitylation.     

The insulator binding protein CTCF associates with the nuclear matrix

Nuclear DNA is organized into chromatin loop domains. At the base of these loops, matrix-associated regions (MARs) of the DNA interact with nuclear matrix proteins. MARs act as structural boundaries within chromatin, and MAR binding proteins may recruit multiprotein complexes that remodel chromatin. The potential tumor suppressor protein CTCF binds to vertebrate insulators and is required for insulator activity. We demonstrate that CTCF is associated with the nuclear matrix and can be cross-linked to DNA by cisplatin, an agent that preferentially cross-links nuclear matrix proteins to DNA in situ. These results suggest that CTCF anchors chromatin to the nuclear matrix, suggesting that there is a functional connection between insulators and the nuclear matrix. We also show that the chromatin-modifying enzymes HDAC1 and HDAC2, which are intrinsic nuclear matrix components and thought to function as corepressors of CTCF, are incapable of associating with CTCF. Hence, the insulator activity of CTCF apparently involves an HDAC-independent association with the nuclear matrix. We propose that CTCF may demarcate nuclear matrix-dependent points of transition in chromatin, thereby forming topologically independent chromatin loops that may support gene silencing.     

Topologically associating domains and chromatin loops depend on cohesin and are regulated by CTCF,WAPL, and PDS5 proteins

Mammalian genomes are spatially organized into compartments, topologically associating domains (TADs), and loops to facilitate gene regulation and other chromosomal functions. How compartments, TADs, and loops are generated is unknown. It has been proposed that cohesin forms TADs and loops by extruding chromatin loops until it encounters CTCF, but direct evidence for this hypothesis is missing. Here, we show that cohesin suppresses compartments but is required for TADs and loops, that CTCF defines their boundaries, and that the cohesin unloading factor WAPL and its PDS5 binding partners control the length of loops. In the absence of WAPL and PDS5 proteins, cohesin forms extended loops, presumably by passing CTCF sites, accumulates in axial chromosomal positions (vermicelli), and condenses chromosomes. Unexpectedly, PDS5 proteins are also required for boundary function. These results show that cohesin has an essential genome‐wide function in mediating long‐range chromatin interactions and support the hypothesis that cohesin creates these by loop extrusion, until it is delayed by CTCF in a manner dependent on PDS5 proteins, or until it is released from DNA by WAPL.     

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis of higher-order chromatin structures of Zea mays. Highly methylated DNA in the 50 kb chromatin structure

We have investigated the presence of higher-order chromatin structures in different maize tissues. Taking advantage of the pulsed-field gel electrophoresis technique to analyse large DNA fragments from intact nuclei and cells, we have determined the size distribution of the high-molecular-weight DNA fragments obtained from chromatin degradation by endogenous nucleases in isolated nuclei. Chromatin digestion leads to the appearance of stable DNA fragments of about 50 kb in all the tissues examined, suggesting the folding of DNA in higher-order chromatin domain structures. It has been reported that such chromatin domains are formed by loops of the 30 nm fibres anchored to the nuclear matrix by a complex set of proteins, including DNA topoisomerase II. Treatment of maize protoplasts with the calcium ionophore A23187 and the antitumour drug VM-26, which specifically inhibit the religation of the cleaved DNA in the topoisomerase II reaction, also produces the 50 kb structure. Analysis of the DNA contained in the 50 kb chromatin structure shows a higher degree of methylation than in bulk maize chromosomal DNA. The role of methylated DNA in the chromatin folding is discussed.     

Spatial organization and conformational mobility of DNA complexed with nucleoproteins]

The importance of spatial organization of DNA for the regulation of genome activity is discussed. The main problem reviewed in this paper includes cooperative interactions of proteins with DNA, formation of DNA loops in the regulatory domains of the genome and conformational mobility of DNA in chromatin.     

Progressive polycomb assembly on H3K27me3 compartments generates polycomb bodies with developmentally regulated motion

Polycomb group (PcG) proteins are conserved chromatin factors that maintain silencing of key developmental genes outside of their expression domains. Recent genome-wide analyses showed a Polycomb (PC) distribution with binding to discrete PcG response elements (PREs). Within the cell nucleus, PcG proteins localize in structures called PC bodies that contain PcG-silenced genes, and it has been recently shown that PREs form local and long-range spatial networks. Here, we studied the nuclear distribution of two PcG proteins, PC and Polyhomeotic (PH). Thanks to a combination of immunostaining, immuno-FISH, and live imaging of GFP fusion proteins, we could analyze the formation and the mobility of PC bodies during fly embryogenesis as well as compare their behavior to that of the condensed fraction of euchromatin. Immuno-FISH experiments show that PC bodies mainly correspond to 3D structural counterparts of the linear genomic domains identified in genome-wide studies. During early embryogenesis, PC and PH progressively accumulate within PC bodies, which form nuclear structures localized on distinct euchromatin domains containing histone H3 tri-methylated on K27. Time-lapse analysis indicates that two types of motion influence the displacement of PC bodies and chromatin domains containing H2Av-GFP. First, chromatin domains and PC bodies coordinately undergo long-range motions that may correspond to the movement of whole chromosome territories. Second, each PC body and chromatin domain has its own fast and highly constrained motion. In this motion regime, PC bodies move within volumes slightly larger than those of condensed chromatin domains. Moreover, both types of domains move within volumes much smaller than chromosome territories, strongly restricting their possibility of interaction with other nuclear structures. The fast motion of PC bodies and chromatin domains observed during early embryogenesis strongly decreases in late developmental stages, indicating a possible contribution of chromatin dynamics in the maintenance of stable gene silencing.     

核基质结合序列（MAR）与基因表达调控

核基质结合序列（MAR）是能在体外与核基质特异结合的DNA序列,广泛存在于染色质Loop结构的边界序列中。随着研究的深入,发现MAR序列不仅在染色质折叠中起到重要作用,影响邻近内源基因表达,而且将MAR序列构建到外源基因表达盒两侧转化动植物时,也影响外源基因的表达。因此,MAR序列是基因组中一种重要的基因间边界序列,为阐明非编码序列在基因表达中的作用和构建真核生物高效表达载体提供了新途径。     

Cross-linking of DNA through HMGA1 suggests a DNA scaffold

Binding of proteins to DNA is usually considered 1D with one protein bound to one DNA molecule. In principle, proteins with multiple DNA binding domains could also bind to and thereby cross-link different DNA molecules. We have investigated this possibility using high-mobility group A1 (HMGA1) proteins, which are architectural elements of chromatin and are involved in the regulation of multiple DNA-dependent processes. Using direct stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (dSTORM), we could show that overexpression of HMGA1a-eGFP in Cos-7 cells leads to chromatin aggregation. To investigate if HMGA1a is directly responsible for this chromatin compaction we developed a DNA cross-linking assay. We were able to show for the first time that HMGA1a can cross-link DNA directly. Detailed analysis using point mutated proteins revealed a novel DNA cross-linking domain. Electron microscopy indicates that HMGA1 proteins are able to create DNA loops and supercoils in linearized DNA confirming the cross-linking ability of HMGA1a. This capacity has profound implications for the spatial organization of DNA in the cell nucleus and suggests cross-linking activities for additional nuclear proteins.     

Heterogeneous interactions and polymer entropy decide organization and dynamics of chromatin domains

Chromatin is known to be organized into multiple domains of varying sizes and compaction. While these domains are often imagined as static structures, they are highly dynamic and show cell-to-cell variability. Since processes such as gene regulation and DNA replication occur in the context of these domains, it is important to understand their organization, fluctuation, and dynamics. To simulate chromatin domains, one requires knowledge of interaction strengths among chromatin segments. Here, we derive interaction-strength parameters from experimentally known contact maps and use them to predict chromatin organization and dynamics. Taking two domains on the human chromosome as examples, we investigate its three-dimensional organization, size/shape fluctuations, and dynamics of different segments within a domain, accounting for hydrodynamic effects. Considering different cell types, we quantify changes in interaction strengths and chromatin shape fluctuations in different epigenetic states. Perturbing the interaction strengths systematically, we further investigate how epigenetic-like changes can alter the spatio-temporal nature of the domains. Our results show that heterogeneous weak interactions are crucial in determining the organization of the domains. Computing effective stiffness and relaxation times, we investigate how perturbations in interactions affect the solid- and liquid-like nature of chromatin domains. Quantifying dynamics of chromatin segments within a domain, we show how the competition between polymer entropy and interaction energy influence the timescales of loop formation and maintenance of stable loops.     

Forces driving the three‐dimensional folding of eukaryotic genomes

The last decade has radically renewed our understanding of higher order chromatin folding in the eukaryotic nucleus. As a result, most current models are in support of a mostly hierarchical and relatively stable folding of chromosomes dividing chromosomal territories into A‐ (active) and B‐ (inactive) compartments, which are then further partitioned into topologically associating domains (TADs), each of which is made up from multiple loops stabilized mainly by the CTCF and cohesin chromatin‐binding complexes. Nonetheless, the structure‐to‐function relationship of eukaryotic genomes is still not well understood. Here, we focus on recent work highlighting the biophysical and regulatory forces that contribute to the spatial organization of genomes, and we propose that the various conformations that chromatin assumes are not so much the result of a linear hierarchy, but rather of both converging and conflicting dynamic forces that act on it.     

Structure and function of the BAH domain in chromatin biology

Abstract

Proteins containing Bromo Adjacent Homology (BAH) domain are often associated with biological processes involving chromatin, and mutations in BAH domains have been found in human diseases. A number of structural and functional studies have revealed that the BAH domain plays diverse and versatile roles in chromatin biology, including protein–protein interactions, recognition of methylated histones and nucleosome binding. Here we review recent developments in structural studies of the BAH domain, and intend to place the structural results in the context of biological functions of the BAH domain-containing proteins. A converging theme from the structural studies appears that the predominantly β-sheet fold of the BAH domain serves as a scaffold, and function-specific structural features are incorporated at the loops connecting the β-strands and surface-exposed areas. The structures clearly specified regions critical for protein–protein interactions, located the position of methyllysine-binding site and implicated areas important for nucleosome binding. The structural results provided valuable insights into the molecular mechanisms of BAH domains in molecular recognitions, and the information should greatly facilitate mechanistic understanding of BAH domain proteins in chromatin biology.