Traditional Chinese medicine shenhuang granule in patients with severe/critical COVID-19: A randomized controlled multicenter trial

BackgroundCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is still a pandemic, with a high mortality rate in severe/critical cases. Therapies based on the Shenghuang Granule have proved helpful in viral infection and septic shock.Hypothesis/PurposeThe objective of the current study was to compare the efficacy and safety of the traditional Chinese medicine, Shenhuang Granule, with standard care in hospitalized patients with severe/critical COVID-19.Study Design and MethodsThis was an open-label, multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial. At 4 medical centers, a total of 111 severe/critical patients were randomly assigned to receive Shenhuang Granule (SHG group) twice a day for 14 days, in addition to standard care, or to receive standard care alone (Control group). The maximal follow up time was 75 days. The clinical endpoint was clinical improvement and mortality.Results54 patients were assigned to the control group and 57 to the SHG group. The overall mortality was 75.9% (41/54) in the control group, and 38.6% (22/57) in the SHG group (p < 0.01 vs. control). The post hoc analysis showed that in the severe category, the mortality of the control group vs. the SHG group was 58.8% (10/17) vs. 5.3% (1/19) (p < 0.01); while in the critical category, it was 83.8% (31/37) vs. 55.3% (21/38) (p < 0.05). In the severe category, the mortality of patients who eventually received an invasive ventilator in the control vs. the SHG group was 58.8% (10/17) vs. 0 (0/19) (p < 0.01). Administration of SHG was associated with increased lymphocytes and decreased adverse events.ConclusionShenhuang Granule is a promising integrative therapy for severe and critical COVID-19.     

Combination of Hua Shi Bai Du granule (Q-14) and standard care in the treatment of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A single-center,open-label,randomized controlled trial

ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of Hua Shi Bai Du Granule (Q-14) plus standard care compared with standard care alone in adults with coronavirus disease (COVID-19).Study DesignA single-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial.SettingWuhan Jinyintan Hospital, Wuhan, China, February 27 to March 27, 2020.ParticipantsA total of 204 patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 were randomized into the treatment group and control group, consisting of 102 patients in each group.InterventionsIn the treatment group, Q-14 was administered at 10 g (granules) twice daily for 14 days, plus standard care. In the control group, patients were provided standard care alone for 14 days.Main Outcome MeasureThe primary outcome was the conversion time for the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) viral assay. Adverse events were analyzed in the safety population.ResultsAmong the 204 patients, 195 were analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle. A total of 149 patients (71 vs. 78 in the treatment and control groups, respectively) tested negative via the SARS-CoV-2 viral assay. There was no statistical significance in the conversion time between the treatment group and control group (Full analysis set: Median [interquartile range]: 10.00 [9.00-11.00] vs. 10.00 [9.00-11.00]; Mean rank: 67.92 vs. 81.44; P = 0.051). The recovery time for fever was shorter in the treatment group than in the control group. The disappearance rate of symptoms like cough, fatigue, and chest discomfort was significantly higher in the treatment group. In chest computed tomography (CT) examinations, the overall evaluation of chest CT examination after treatment compared with baseline showed that more patients improved in the treatment group. There were no significant differences in the other outcomes.ConclusionThe combination of Q-14 and standard care for COVID-19 was useful for the improvement of symptoms (such as fever, cough, fatigue, and chest discomfort), but did not result in a significantly higher probability of negative conversion in the SARS-CoV-2 viral assay. No serious adverse events were observed.Trial RegistrationChiCTR2000030288     

Physcion,a tetra-substituted 9,10-anthraquinone,prevents homocysteine-induced endothelial dysfunction by activating Ca2+- and Akt-eNOS-NO signaling pathways

BackgroundHomocysteine (Hcy) induced vascular endothelial dysfunction is known to be closely associated with oxidative stress and impaired NO system. 1,8-Dihydroxy-3-methoxy-6-methylanthracene-9,10-dione (physcion) has been known to has antioxidative and anti-inflammatory properties.PurposeThe purpose of the present study was to define the protective effect of physcion on Hcy-induced endothelial dysfunction and its mechanisms involved.Study Design and MethodsHyperhomocysteinemia (HHcy) rat model was induced by feeding 3% methionine. A rat thoracic aortic ring model was used to investigate the effects of physcion on Hcy-induced impairment of endothelium-dependent relaxation. Two doses, low (L, 30 mg/kg/day) and high (H, 50 mg/kg/day) of physcion were used in the present study. To construct Hcy-injured human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) model, the cells treated with 3 mM Hcy. The effects of physcion on Hcy-induced HUVECs cytotoxicity and apoptosis were studied using MTT and flow cytometry. Confocal analysis was used to determine the levels of intracellular Ca²⁺. The levels of protein expression of the apoptosis-related markers Bcl-2, Bax, caspase-9/3, and Akt and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) were evaluated by western blot.ResultsIn the HHcy rat model, plasma levels of Hcy and malondialdehyde (MDA) were elevated (20.45 ± 2.42 vs. 4.67 ± 1.94 μM, 9.42 ± 0.48 vs. 3.47 ± 0.59 nM, p < 0.001 for both), whereas superoxide dismutase (SOD) and nitric oxide (NO) levels were decreased (77.11 ± 4.78 vs. 115.02 ± 5.63 U/ml, 44.51 ± 4.45 vs. 64.18 ± 5.34 μM, p < 0.001 and p < 0.01, respectively). However, treatment with physcion significantly reversed these changes (11.82 ± 2.02 vs. 20.45 ± 2.42 μM, 5.97 ± 0.72 vs. 9.42 ± 0.48 nM, 108.75 ± 5.65 vs. 77.11 ± 4.78 U/ml, 58.14 ± 6.02 vs. 44.51 ± 4.45 μM, p < 0.01 for all). Physcion also prevented Hcy-induced impairment of endothelium-dependent relaxation in HHcy rats (1.56 ± 0.06 vs. 15.44 ± 2.53 nM EC₅₀ for ACh vasorelaxation, p < 0.05 vs. HHcy). In Hcy-injured HUVECs, physcion inhibited the impaired viability, apoptosis and reactive oxygen species. Hcy treatment significantly increased the protein phosphorylation levels of p38 (2.26 ± 0.20 vs. 1.00 ± 0.12, p <0.01), ERK (2.11 ± 0.21 vs. 1.00 ± 0.11, p <0.01) and JNK. Moreover, physcion reversed the Hcy-induced apoptosis related parameter changes such as decreased mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) and Bcl-2/Bax protein ratio, and increased protein expression of caspase-9/3 in HUVECs. Furthermore, the downregulation of Ca²⁺, Akt, eNOS and NO caused by Hcy were recovered with physcion treatment in HUVECs.ConclusionPhyscion prevents Hcy-induced endothelial dysfunction by activating Ca²⁺- and Akt-eNOS-NO signaling pathways. This study provides the first evidence that physcion might be a candidate agent for the prevention of cardiovascular disease induced by Hcy.     

溶栓胶囊联合丁苯酞软胶囊对脑梗死恢复期患者血液流变学、脑血流动力学和神经因子的影响

摘要 目的：探讨溶栓胶囊联合丁苯酞软胶囊对脑梗死恢复期患者血液流变学、脑血流动力学和神经因子的影响。方法：选取2021年1月-2022年1月期间长治医学院附属和平医院收治的100例脑梗死恢复期患者,按照随机数字表法分为研究组（50例）和对照组（50例）,对照组接受丁苯酞软胶囊治疗,研究组接受溶栓胶囊联合丁苯酞软胶囊治疗。对比两组疗效、血液流变学、脑血流动力学、神经因子和不良反应发生情况。结果：研究组90.00%的临床总有效率高于对照组72.00%（P<0.05）。治疗20 d后,两组美国国立卫生院神经功能缺损评分（NIHSS）评分下降,Barthel指数（BI）评分升高,且研究组改善幅度大于对照组（P<0.05）。治疗20 d后,两组全血粘度、血浆粘度、血沉（ESR）、纤维蛋白原（FIB）和红细胞压积（HCT）均下降,且研究组低于对照组（P<0.05）。治疗20 d后,两组平均血流速度（Vm）升高,搏动指数（PI）及阻力指数（RI）均下降,且研究组改善幅度大于对照组（P<0.05）。治疗20 d后,两组神经元特异性烯醇化酶（NSE）下降,神经生长因子（NGF）、神经营养因子（BDNF）升高,且研究组改善幅度大于对照组（P<0.05）。两组不良反应发生率组间对比无差异（P>0.05）。结论：溶栓胶囊联合丁苯酞软胶囊可有效改善脑梗死恢复期患者血液流变学、脑血流动力学,促进神经功能恢复,提高生活活动能力,效果显著。     

Effect and safety of Chinese herbal medicine granules in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 in Wuhan,China: a retrospective,single-center study with propensity score matching

BackgroundChinese herbal medicine (CHM) has been used for severe illness caused by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but its treatment effects and safety are unclear.PurposeThis study reviews the effect and safety of CHM granules in the treatment of patients with severe COVID-19.MethodsWe conducteda single-center, retrospective study on patients with severe COVID-19 in a designated hospital in Wuhan from January 15, 2020 to March 30, 2020. The propensity score matching (PSM) was used to assess the effect and safety of the treatment using CHM granules. The ratio of patients who received treatment with CHM granules combined with usual care and those who received usual care alone was 1:1. The primary outcome was the time to clinical improvement within 28 days, defined as the time taken for the patients’ health to show improvement by decline of two categories (from the baseline) on a modified six-category ordinal scale, or to be dischargedfrom the hospital before Day 28.ResultsUsing PSM, 43 patients (45% male) aged 65.6 (57–70) yearsfrom each group were exactly matched. No significant difference was observed in clinical improvement of patients treated with CHM granules compared with those who received usual (p = 0.851). However, the use of CHM granules reduced the 28-day mortality (p = 0.049) and shortened the duration of fever (4 days vs. 7 days, p = 0.002). The differences in the duration of cough and dyspnea and the difference in lung lesion ratio on computerized tomography scans were not significant.Commonly,patients in the CHM group had an increased D-dimer level (p = 0.036).ConclusionForpatients with severe COVID-19, CHM granules, combined with usual care, showed no improvement beyond usual care alone. However, the use of CHM granules reduced the 28-day mortality rate and the time to fever alleviation. Nevertheless, CHM granules may be associated with high risk of fibrinolysis.     

Efficacy and safety of Chinese herbal medicine versus Lopinavir-Ritonavir in adult patients with coronavirus disease 2019: A non-randomized controlled trial

BackgroundTreatments for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are limited by suboptimal efficacy.MethodsFrom January 30, 2020 to March 23, 2020, we conducted a non-randomised controlled trial, in which all adult patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 were assigned to three groups non-randomly and given supportive treatments: Group A, Lopinavir-Ritonavir; Group B, Huashi Baidu Formula (a Chinese medicineformula made by the China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences to treat COVID-19, which is now in the clinical trial period) and Lopinavir-Ritonavir; and Group C, Huashi Baidu Formula. The use of antibiotics, antiviruses, and corticosteroids was permitted in Group A and B. Traditional Chinese medicine injections were permitted in Group C. The primary outcomes were clinical remission time (interval from admission to the first time the patient tested negatively for novel coronavirus or an obvious improvement was observed from chest CT) and clinical remission rate (number of patients whose clinical time was within 16 days/total number of patients).ResultsA total of 60 adult patients with COVID-19 were enrolled at sites in Wuhan, China, and the sample size of each group was 20. In Groups A, B and C, the clinical remission rates were 95.0%%(19/20), 100.0%%(20/20) and 100.0%%(20/20), respectively. Compared with Groups A and B, the clinical remission time of Group C was significantly shorter (5.9 days vs. 10.8 days, p < 0.05; 5.9 days vs. 9.7 days, p < 0.05). There was no significant difference among Groups A, B, and C in terms of the time taken to be released from quarantine. The clinical biochemical indicators and safety indexes showed no significant differences among the three groups.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that Lopinavir-Ritonavir has some efficacy in the treatment of COVID-19, and the Huashi Baidu Formula might enhance this effect to an extent. In addition, superiority was displayed in the treatment of COVID-19 through a combination of the Huashi Baidu Formula and traditional Chinese medicine injection. In future, well-designed prospective double-blinded randomised control trials are required to confirm our findings.     

Carvacrol improves pulmonary function tests,oxidant/antioxidant parameters and cytokine levels in asthmatic patients: A randomized,double-blind,clinical trial

BackgroundCarvacrol effects on inflammatory mediators, lung pathology and tracheal responsiveness were indicated in animal models of pulmonary diseases.PurposeTo evaluate carvacrol effects on respiratory symptoms, pulmonary function tests (PFT), oxidative stress markers and cytokine levels in asthmatic patients.Study DesignThis study was a randomized, placebo-controlled double-blind, clinical trial.MethodsThirty-three moderate asthmatic patients were divided to the two groups of: placebo group (n = 16) and carvacrol group (1.2 mg/kg/day, n = 17). Prepared capsules were taken for two months along, 3 times/day along with routine medications. Respiratory symptoms, PFT, and oxidative stress markers were evaluated before the treatment (step 0), and one (step I) and two months (step II) after the beginning of the treatment. However, cytokine levels in serum and supernatant of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), and their gene expression were evaluated in step 0 and II.ResultsIn carvacrol-treated group, respiratory symptoms significantly decreased after one- and two-month treatment with carvacrol compared to pre-treatment values (p < 0.05 to p < 0.001). Compared to step 0, PFT values were significantly increased in step I and II, in treated group with carvacrol (p < 0.05 to p < 0.001). Most oxidative stress markers were improved following carvacrol treatment (p < 0.05 to p < 0.001). Treatment with carvacrol for two‐month also significantly improved cytokine levels in serum and supernatant of PBMC, compared to step 0 (p < 0.05 to p < 0.001). However, no significant changes were observed in the above-noted parameters in the placebo group.ConclusionDue to anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effect, carvacrol could be suggested as a therapeutic agent for asthma.     

Pathological and immunological evaluation of different regimens of praziquantel treatment in a mouse model of Schistosoma mansoni infection

BackgroundOne of the considerable challenges of schistosomiasis chemotherapy is the inefficacy of praziquantel (PZQ) at the initial phase of the infection. Immature schistosomes are not susceptible to PZQ at the curative dose. Here, we investigated the efficacy of different PZQ regimens administered during the initial stage of Schistosoma mansoni infection in mice.Methodology/Principal findingsTwo months-old mice were individually infected with 80 S. mansoni cercariae and divided into one infected-untreated control group (IC) and four PZQ-treated groups: PZQ at 100 mg/kg/day for five consecutive days (group PZQ1), PZQ at 100 mg/kg/day for 28 days (group PZQ2), PZQ at 18 mg/kg/day for 28 days (group PZQ3) and a single dose of PZQ at 500 mg/kg (group PZQ4). The treatment started on day one post-infection (p.i), and each group of mice was divided into two subgroups euthanized on day 36 or 56 p.i, respectively. We determined the mortality rate, the parasitological burden, the hepatic and intestinal granulomas, the serum levels of Th-1, Th-2, and Th-17 cytokines, and gene expression. The treatment led to a significant (p < 0.001) reduction of worm burden and egg counts in the intestine and liver in groups PZQ2 and PZQ3. On 56^th day p.i, there was a significant reduction (p < 0.001) of the number and volume of the hepatic granulomas in groups PZQ2 and PZQ3 compared to group PZQ1 or PZQ4. Moreover, in group PZQ3, the serum levels of IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-13, and IL-17 and their liver mRNA expressions were significantly reduced while IL-10 and TGF-β gene expression significantly increased. The highest mortality rate (81.25%) was recorded in group PZQ2.Conclusion/SignificanceThis study revealed that the administration of PZQ at 18 mg/kg/day for 28 consecutive days was the optimal effective posology for treating S. mansoni infection at the initial stage in a murine model.     

Overall and cause-specific hospitalisation and death after COVID-19 hospitalisation in England: A cohort study using linked primary care,secondary care,and death registration data in the OpenSAFELY platform

BackgroundThere is concern about medium to long-term adverse outcomes following acute Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), but little relevant evidence exists. We aimed to investigate whether risks of hospital admission and death, overall and by specific cause, are raised following discharge from a COVID-19 hospitalisation.Methods and findingsWith the approval of NHS-England, we conducted a cohort study, using linked primary care and hospital data in OpenSAFELY to compare risks of hospital admission and death, overall and by specific cause, between people discharged from COVID-19 hospitalisation (February to December 2020) and surviving at least 1 week, and (i) demographically matched controls from the 2019 general population; and (ii) people discharged from influenza hospitalisation in 2017 to 2019. We used Cox regression adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, obesity, smoking status, deprivation, and comorbidities considered potential risk factors for severe COVID-19 outcomes.We included 24,673 postdischarge COVID-19 patients, 123,362 general population controls, and 16,058 influenza controls, followed for ≤315 days. COVID-19 patients had median age of 66 years, 13,733 (56%) were male, and 19,061 (77%) were of white ethnicity. Overall risk of hospitalisation or death (30,968 events) was higher in the COVID-19 group than general population controls (fully adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.22, 2.14 to 2.30, p < 0.001) but slightly lower than the influenza group (aHR 0.95, 0.91 to 0.98, p = 0.004). All-cause mortality (7,439 events) was highest in the COVID-19 group (aHR 4.82, 4.48 to 5.19 versus general population controls [p < 0.001] and 1.74, 1.61 to 1.88 versus influenza controls [p < 0.001]). Risks for cause-specific outcomes were higher in COVID-19 survivors than in general population controls and largely similar or lower in COVID-19 compared with influenza patients. However, COVID-19 patients were more likely than influenza patients to be readmitted or die due to their initial infection or other lower respiratory tract infection (aHR 1.37, 1.22 to 1.54, p < 0.001) and to experience mental health or cognitive-related admission or death (aHR 1.37, 1.02 to 1.84, p = 0.039); in particular, COVID-19 survivors with preexisting dementia had higher risk of dementia hospitalisation or death (age- and sex-adjusted HR 2.47, 1.37 to 4.44, p = 0.002). Limitations of our study were that reasons for hospitalisation or death may have been misclassified in some cases due to inconsistent use of codes, and we did not have data to distinguish COVID-19 variants.ConclusionsIn this study, we observed that people discharged from a COVID-19 hospital admission had markedly higher risks for rehospitalisation and death than the general population, suggesting a substantial extra burden on healthcare. Most risks were similar to those observed after influenza hospitalisations, but COVID-19 patients had higher risks of all-cause mortality, readmission or death due to the initial infection, and dementia death, highlighting the importance of postdischarge monitoring.

Krishnan Bhaskaran and co-workers study health outcomes after admission with COVID-19 and subsequent discharge.     

Concentrations of LH,prolactin and progesterone in early-pregnant and oestradiol-treated pigs

Fifteen gilts (n = 5 per group) were used to study plasma LH, prolactin and progesterone concentrations on days 13–19 after oestrus in early-pregnant, oestradiol-treated (5 mg, administered on days 11–15) and control cycling pigs.Peripheral blood samples were taken without stress at one-hour intervals for 12 h on days 13–14, 15–16 and 18–19. There was no difference amongst groups in LH levels on days 13–14 and 15–16. The LH levels in the cycling untreated pigs was lower (P < 0.05) than in pregnant gilts on days 18–19. Concentrations of prolactin in oestradioltreated pigs were 7–20 times higher than in pregnant pigs. The greatest differences in progesterone concentrations were recorded on days 18–19. Progesterone levels were less (P < 0.01) in oestrogen-treated gilts (14.54±1.09 ng/ml) when compared with pregnant gilts (24.23 ± 4.10). A comparison of the secretion patterns for the three hormones showed that injections of oestradiol given to the cycling gilt did not result in patterns which fully imitate the implantation period of natural pregnancy in the pig.     

Radiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer in elderly patients: results and prognostic factors a single cohort

BackgroundThe objective of this study was to assess the treatment outcomes and prognostic factors of elderly patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer (LAHNC) undergoing radiotherapy (RT).Materials and methodsA retrospective cohort from a single institution, from 2000 to 2015, including patients older than 65 years old with LAHNC (stage III–IVa) treated by RT combined or not with chemotherapy (CRT). Univariate and multivariate analysis (MVA) were performed to identify prognostic factors associated with overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CS), and locoregional control (LRC). A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant.Results220 patients with LAHNC and > 65 years of age were identified. The median follow-up was 3.8 years, the 3/5 years estimated OS, CS, and LRC rate was 40%/30%, 49%/34%, 76%/45%, respectively. In the univariate analysis, clinical stage (III vs. IVa/b, p = 0.01), tumor stage (T1/2 vs. T3/4, p = 0.035), Karnofsky performance status (KPS, 60–70, p = 0.03) and tumor site (other than vs. hypopharynx, p = 0.0001) were associated with lower OS. Patients with clinical stage (III vs. IVa/b, p = 0.01), tumor stage (T1/2 vs. T3/4, p = 0.015), N stage (N0/1 vs. N2/3, p = 0.04), (KPS 60–70, p = 0.04) and tumor site (other than vs. hypopharynx, p = 0.0001) had worst CS. For the LRC, clinical stage (III vs. IVa/b, p = 0.02), tumor stage (T1/2 vs. T3/4, p = 0.02), treatment type (CRT vs. RT, p = 0.02), RT technique (IMRT vs. 2DRT/3DRT, p = 0.0001), and tumor site (other than vs. hypopharynx, p = 0.02) were significant. In the MVA, KPS maintained significant for OS and CS. For LRC, clinical stage (Iva/b, p = 0.007), tumor stage (T3/4, p = 0.047) and radiotherapy technique other than IMRT (p = 0.0001) were significant.ConclusionThe OS, CS, and LRC were associated with several prognostic factors. The clinical performance was the main marker of OS and CS. Chemoradiation should be offered to selected elderly patients using IMRT to improve LRC.     

Trace element imbalances in patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis therapy – Report of an observational study in a cohort of Portuguese patients

IntroductionPatients with end-stage renal disease undergoing hemodialysis therapy are at risk of developing deficiencies of essential trace elements and/or overload of toxic trace elements, both of which may significantly affect their clinical status of. Those imbalances may result from the disease itself but also from the quality of the therapeutic process, namely the hemodialysis process, which has greatly evolved in the last decades. Thus, old observations that have been assumed as very well-proven have been recently questioned. In this case-control study we evaluate the current trace elements status in a group of Portuguese patients under hemodialysis therapy.Material and methodsSerum samples from patients (n = 93), collected for the routine periodic control of Al levels, were analyzed for a wide panel of trace elements (Li, Al, Mn, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Se, Rb, Sr, Mo, Cd, Ba, Pb) using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry technique (hemodialysis patients’ group). For comparison purposes, samples of individuals with no evidence of renal disease according to standard laboratory analytical criteria (n = 50) were also analyzed (control group).ResultsThe results showed significant differences between the two groups, with higher values in hemodialysis patients group for Al (14.6 vs. 9.5 μg/L), Co, Ni, Sr, Mo (4.5 vs. 1.4 μg/L), Cd (0.058 vs. 0.025 μg/L) and Pb (0.55 vs. 0.30 μg/L); and lower values in hemodialysis patients group for Li (4.0 vs. 75.8 μg/L), Mn, Cu (943.5 vs. 1038.5 μg/L), Zn (943.5 vs. 1038.5 μg/L), Se (71.5 vs. 103.8 μg/L), Rb (202.4 vs. 300.3 μg/L) and Ba (0.65 vs. 8.7 μg/L).ConclusionThis study confirms that hemodialysis patients tend to present significant trace elements imbalances, which may be related to the higher morbidity and mortality observed in this specific patients’ group.     

脑血康胶囊联合巴曲酶对急性脑梗死患者血清 MBP、NSE水平的影响

摘要 目的：研究脑血康胶囊联合巴曲酶对急性脑梗死患者血清髓鞘碱性蛋白(myebin bosic protein,MBP)、神经元特异性烯醇化酶(neuron-specific enolase,NSE)水平的影响。方法：选择2018年3月～2019年3月我院收治的161例急性脑梗死患者,将其随机分为两组。对照组静脉滴注巴曲酶,首次给予10 BU,隔日给予5 BU,每两天给药1次;观察组在巴曲酶的基础上联合口服脑血康胶囊,每天3 次,每次3粒。观察和比较两组治疗总有效率、治疗前后血清MBP、NSE、全血黏度(whole blood viscosity,WBV)、红细胞压积(hematocrit,HCT)、血浆黏度(plasma viscosity,PV)和纤维蛋白原(fibrinogen,FIB)水平及NHISS和BI评分的变化。结果：治疗后,观察组的有效率为91.25 %,明显高于对照组(64.2%,P<0.05);两组血清MBP、NSE、WBV、HCT、PV和FIB水平均较治疗前明显降低(P<0.05),且观察组的以上指标明显低于对照组(P<0.05);两组的BI评分明显升高(P<0.05),NHISS评分明显降低(P<0.05),观察组BI评分明显高于对照组,而NHISS评分明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论：脑血康胶囊联合巴曲酶对急性脑梗死有显著的疗效,能明显降低患者血清MBP、NSE水平,促进神经功能的恢复。     

Postoperative radio-chemotherapy for rectal cancer: A retrospective analysis from a tertiary referral hospital

AimTo report results of postoperative radio-chemotherapy (RT-CHT) for rectal cancer (RC).BackgroundTotal mesorectal excision (TME) is an essential treatment method in rectal cancer (RC). Perioperative radiotherapy in locally advanced RC improves loco-regional free survival (LRFS). Preoperative radiotherapy is a preferred option; however, some patients are not referred for it. In case of the risk of loco-regional failure postoperative radio-chemotherapy (RT-CHT) is indicated.Material and methodsBetween 2004 and 2010, 182 patients with pathological stage II-III RC (TME performed — 41%, resection R0 — 88%, circumferential resection margin evaluated — 55.5% and was above 2 mm in 66% of them) received postoperative RT-CHT in our institution. Overall survival (OS) and LRFS were estimated with the Kaplan–Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to compare the impact of prognostic factors on survival.ResultsFive-year OS and LRFS rates were 63% and 85%, respectively. Loco-regional recurrence and isolated distant metastases rates were 11.5% and 19%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed stage (III vs. II), HR: 2.3 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.4–3.8), p = 0.0001; extent of resection (R1−2 vs. R0), HR: 2.14 (95%CI: 1.14–3.99), p = 0.017, and age (>65 vs. ≤65 years), HR: 1.66 (95%CI: 1.06–2.61), p = 0.027 as prognostic factors for OS. Extent of resection (R1−2 vs. R0), HR: 3.65 (95%CI: 1.41–9.43), p = 0.008 had significant impact on LRFS.ConclusionDespite a suboptimal quality of surgery and pathological reports, the outcome in our series is close to that reported in the literature. We confirm a strong impact of the extent of resection on patient’s outcome, which confirms the pivotal role of surgery in the management of RC.     

Impact of TP53 Codon 72 and MDM2 SNP 309 Polymorphisms in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of TP53 (codon 72, rs1042522) and MDM2 promoter (SNP 309, rs2279744) have been associated with risk for various human cancers. However, studies analyzing these polymorphisms in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are lacking. We investigated TP53 codon 72 and MDM2 SNP 309 polymorphisms in 32 patients with PDAC, 16 patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP), and 32 normal controls, using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue. We also examined TP53 and MDM2 protein immunohistochemistry (IHC) to assess the involvement of these differences in malignant transformation and disease progression. TP53 Pro/Pro genotype was significantly more frequent in PDAC patients than in controls (65.6 vs. 15.6%, p < 0.001) and no significant difference was found between CP patients (37.5%) and controls. In MDM2 SNP 309, there were no significant differences among the three groups. Based on the Kaplan-Meier analysis, overall survival was significantly shorter in MDM2 G/G genotypes compared with other genotypes (G/T and T/T) (359 vs. 911 days, p = 0.016) whereas no significant differences in TP53 genotypes were observed (638 vs. 752 days, p = 0.471). Although TP53 IHC was frequent in PDAC patients (53.1%), TP53 and MDM2 protein expression was not correlated with polymorphisms. Our study demonstrated TP53 codon 72 polymorphism is potentially a genetic predisposing factor while MDM2 SNP 309 polymorphism might be useful in predicting survival outcome.     

Different Approaches for Treating Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Retrospective Study of 153 Cases from a Single Spinal Center

ObjectiveThe optimal surgical treatment for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MCSM) remains controversial. This study compared the outcomes of three surgical approaches for MSCM treatment, focusing on the efficacy and safety of a combined approach.MethodsThis retrospective study included 153 consecutive MCSM patients (100 men, 53 women; mean age ± standard deviation, 55.7 ± 9.4 years) undergoing operations involving ≥3 intervertebral segments. The patients were divided into three groups according to surgical approach: anterior (n = 19), posterior (n = 76), and combined (n = 58). We assessed demographic variables, perioperative parameters, and clinical outcomes ≥12 months after surgery (20.5 ± 7.6 months), including Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, improvement, recovery rate, and complications.ResultsThe anterior group had the most favorable preoperative conditions, including the highest preoperative JOA score (12.95 ± 1.86, p = 0.046). In contrast, the combined group had the highest occupancy ratio (48.0% ± 11.6%, p = 0.002). All groups showed significant neurological improvement at final follow-ups, with JOA recovery rates of 59.7%, 54.6%, and 68.9% in the anterior, posterior, and combined groups, respectively (p = 0.163). After multivariable adjustments, the groups did not have significantly different clinical outcomes (postoperative JOA score, p = 0.424; improvement, p = 0.424; recovery rate, p = 0.080). Further, subgroup analyses of patients with occupancy ratios ≥50% showed similar functional outcomes following the posterior and combined approaches. Overall complication rates did not differ significantly among the three approaches (p = 0.600). Occupancy ratios did not have a significant negative influence on postoperative recovery following the posterior approach.ConclusionsIf applied appropriately, all three approaches are effective for treating MCSM. All three approaches had equivalent neurological outcomes, even in subgroups with high occupancy ratios. Further investigations of surgical approaches to MCSM are needed, particularly prospective multicenter studies with long-term follow-up.     

The TrkB agonist, 7,8-dihydroxyflavone,impairs fracture healing in mice

Objectives:To study the effects of the selective TrkB agonist, 7,8-dihydroxyflavone (7,8-DHF), on fracture healing in mice and on an osteoprogenitor cell line, Kusa4b10, in vitro.Methods:Mice received unilateral closed mid-shaft tibial fractures and treated for two weeks with vehicle or 5 mg/kg/day DHF and euthanised at 28 days post-fracture. Calluses were analysed by micro-computed tomography (µCT) and three-point bending biomechanical test. Kusa4b10 cells were cultured with 50nM of 7,8-DHF or vehicle for 3-, 7-, 14-days for RT-PCR, and 21 days for mineralization.Results:µCT found 7,8-DHF calluses had decreased tissue volume (p=0.042), mean polar moment of inertia (p = 0.004), and mean cross-sectional area (p=0.042) compared to controls. At 28 days biomechanical analyses showed 7,8-DHF treatment decreased peak force (p=0.011) and stiffness per unit area (p=0.012). 7,8-DHF treatment did not change Kusa4b10 gene expression of Runx2 and alkaline phosphatase at all time points, nor mineralization.Conclusions:7,8-DHF treatment had a negative impact on fracture healing at 28 days post-fracture via an unknown mechanism. 7,8-DHF may have had a central role in impairing fracture healing.