Specific binding of single-stranded telomeric DNA by Cdc13p of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Cdc13p is a single strand telomere-binding protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae; its telomere-binding region is within amino acids 451-693, Cdc13(451-693)p. In this study, we used purified Cdc13p and Cdc13(451-693)p to characterize their telomere binding activity. We found that the binding specificity of single-stranded TG(1-3) DNA by these two proteins is similar. However, the affinity of Cdc13(451-693)p to DNA was slightly lower than that of Cdc13p. The binding of telomeric DNA by these two proteins was disrupted at NaCl concentrations higher than 0.3 m, indicating that electrostatic interaction contributed significantly to the binding process. Because both proteins bound to strand TG(1-3) DNA positioned at the 3' end, the 5' end, or in the middle of the oligonucleotide substrates, our results indicated that the location of TG(1-3) in single-stranded DNA does not appear to be important for Cdc13p binding. Moreover, using DNase I footprint analysis, the structure of the telomeric DNA complexes of Cdc13p and Cdc13(451-693)p was analyzed. The DNase I footprints of these two proteins to three different telomeric DNA substrates were virtually identical, indicating that the telomere contact region of Cdc13p is within Cdc13(451-693)p. Together, the binding properties of Cdc13p and its binding domain support the theory that the specific binding of Cdc13p to telomeres is an important feature of telomeres that regulate telomerase access and/or differentiate natural telomeres from broken ends.     

Genetic analysis reveals essential and non-essential amino acids within the telomeric DNA-binding interface of Cdc13p

Cdc13p is a specific single-stranded telomeric DNA-binding protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. It is involved in protecting telomeres and regulating telomere length. The telomere-binding domain of Cdc13p is located between residues 497 and 693, and its structure has been resolved by NMR spectroscopy. A series of aromatic, hydrophobic and basic residues located at the DNA-binding surface of Cdc13p are involved in binding to telomeres. Here we applied a genetic approach to analyse the involvements of these residues in telomere binding. A series of mutants within the telomere-binding domain of Cdc13p were identified that failed to complement cdc13 mutants in vivo. Among the amino acids that were isolated, the Tyr522, Arg635, and Ile633 residues were shown to locate at the DNA-binding surface. We further demonstrated that Y522C and R635A mutants failed to bind telomeric DNA in vitro, indicating that these residues are indeed required for telomere binding. We did not, however, isolate other mutant residues located at the DNA-binding surface of Cdc13p beyond these three residues. Instead, a mutant on Lys568 was isolated that did not affect the essential function of Cdc13p. The Lys568 is also located on the DNA-binding surface of Cdc13p. Thus these results suggested that other DNA-binding residues are not essential for telomere binding. In the present study, we have established a genetic test that enabled the identification of telomere-binding residues of Cdc13p in vivo. This type of analysis provides information on those residues that indeed contribute to telomere binding in vivo.     

Interaction of Saccharomyces Cdc13p with Pol1p, Imp4p, Sir4p and Zds2p is involved in telomere replication, telomere maintenance and cell growth control

Telomeres are the physical ends of eukaryotic chromosomes. They are important for maintaining the integrity of chromosomes and this function is mediated through a number of protein factors. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Cdc13p binds to telomeres and affects telomere maintenance, telomere position effects and cell cycle progression through G₂/M phase. We identified four genes encoding Pol1p, Sir4p, Zds2p and Imp4p that interact with amino acids 1–252 of Cdc13p using a yeast two-hybrid screening system. Interactions of these four proteins with Cdc13p were through direct protein–protein interactions as judged by in vitro pull-down assays. Direct protein–protein interactions were also observed between Pol1p–Imp4p, Pol1p–Sir4p and Sir4p–Zds2p, whereas no interaction was detected between Imp4p–Sir4p and Zds2p–Imp4p, suggesting that protein interactions were specific in the complex. Pol1p was shown to interact with Cdc13p. Here we show that Zds2p and Imp4p also form a stable complex with Cdc13p in yeast cells, because Zds2p and Imp4p co-immunoprecipitate with Cdc13p, whereas Sir4p does not. The function of the N-terminal 1–252 region of Cdc13p was also analyzed. Expressing Cdc13(252–924)p, which lacks amino acids 1–252 of Cdc13p, causes defects in progressive cell growth and eventually arrested in the G₂/M phase of the cell cycle. These growth defects were not caused by progressive shortening of telomeres because telomeres in these cells were long. Point mutants in the amino acids 1–252 region of Cdc13p that reduced the interaction between Cdc13p and its binding proteins resulted in varying level of defects in cell growth and telomeres. These results indicate that the interactions between Cdc13(1–252)p and its binding proteins are important for the function of Cdc13p in telomere regulation and cell growth. Together, our results provide evidence for the formation of a Cdc13p-mediated telosome complex through its N-terminal region that is involved in telomere maintenance, telomere length regulation and cell growth control.     

Delineation of the high-affinity single-stranded telomeric DNA-binding domain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Cdc13

Cdc13 is an essential protein from Saccharomyces cerevisiae that caps telomeres by protecting the C-rich telomeric DNA strand from degradation and facilitates telomeric DNA replication by telomerase. In vitro, Cdc13 binds TG-rich single-stranded telomeric DNA with high affinity and specificity. A previously identified domain of Cdc13 encompassing amino acids 451–694 (the 451–694 DBD) retains the single-stranded DNA-binding properties of the full-length protein; however, this domain contains a large unfolded region identified in heteronuclear NMR experiments. Trypsin digestion and MALDI mass spectrometry were used to identify the minimal DNA-binding domain (the 497–694 DBD) necessary and sufficient for full DNA-binding activity. This domain was completely folded, and the N-terminal unfolded region removed was shown to be dispensable for function. Using affinity photocrosslinking to site-specifically modified telomeric single-stranded DNA, the 497–694 DBD was shown to contact the entire 11mer required for high-affinity binding. Intriguingly, both domains bound single-stranded telomeric DNA with much greater affinity than the full-length protein. The full-length protein exhibited the same rate of dissociation as both domains, however, indicating that the full-length protein contains a region that inhibits association with single-stranded telomeric DNA.     

Renaturation and stabilization of the telomere-binding activity of Saccharomyces Cdc13(451-693)p by L-arginine.

Production of recombinant proteins can be valuable in studying their biological functions. However, recombinant proteins expressed in Escherichia coli sometimes form undesirable insoluble aggregates. Solubilization and renaturation of these aggregates becomes a problem that one needs to solve. Here we used recombinant Cdc13(451-693)p as example to show the presence of l-arginine during renaturation greatly enhanced the renaturation efficiency. Cdc13p is the single-stranded telomere-binding protein of yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The telomere-binding domain has been mapped within amino acids 451-693 of Cdc13p, Cdc13(451-693)p. Recombinant Cdc13(451-693)p was expressed in E. coli as insoluble protein aggregates. Purification of insoluble Cdc13(451-693)p was achieved by denaturing the protein with 6 M guanidine-HCl and followed by Ni-nitrilotriacetic acid agarose column chromatography. Renaturation of Cdc13(451-693)p to the active form was achieved by dialyzing denatured protein in the presence of l-arginine. Moreover, the presence of l-arginine was also helped in maintaining the telomere-binding activity of Cdc13(451-693)p. Taking together, l-arginine might have a general application in renaturation of insoluble aggregates.     

Yeast telomerase appears to frequently copy the entire template in vivo

Telomeres derived from the same formation event in wild type strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae possess the same, precise TG_1–3 sequence for the most internal ~100 bp of the 250–350 bp TG_1–3 repeats. The conservation of this internal domain is thought to reflect the fact that telomere lengthening and shortening, and thus alteration of the precise TG_1–3 sequence, is confined to the terminal region of the telomere. The internal domains of telomeres from yku70Δ and tel1Δ mutants, whose entire telomeres are only ~100 bp, were examined by analyzing 5.1 kb of cloned TG_1–3 sequences from telomeres formed during transformation of wild type, yku70Δ and tel1Δ cells. The internal domains were 97–137 bp in wild type cells, 27–36 bp in yku70Δ cells and 7–9 bp in tel1Δ cells. These data suggest that the majority of the tel1Δ cell TG_1–3 repeats may be resynthesized during shortening and lengthening reactions while a portion of the yku70Δ cell telomeres are protected. TG_1–3 sequences are synthesized by telomerase repeatedly copying an internal RNA template, which introduces a sequence bias into TG_1–3 repeats. Analysis of in vivo-derived telomeres revealed that of the many possible high affinity binding sites for the telomere protein Rap1p in TG_1–3 repeats, only those consistent with telomere hybridization to the ACACAC in the 3′-region of the telomerase RNA template followed by copying of most of the template were present. Copies of the telomerase RNA template made up 40–60% of the TG_1–3 sequences from each strain and could be found in long, tandem repeats. The data suggest that in vivo yeast telomerase frequently allows telomeres to hybridize to the 3′-region of RNA template and copy most of it prior to dissociation, or that in vivo telomere processing events result in the production of TG_1–3 sequences that mimic this process.     

Distinct roles for yeast Stn1 in telomere capping and telomerase inhibition

The budding yeast Cdc13, Stn1 and Ten1 (CST) proteins are proposed to function as an RPA-like complex at telomeres that protects (‘caps'') chromosome ends and regulates their elongation by telomerase. We show that Stn1 has a critical function in both processes through the deployment of two separable domains. The N terminus of Stn1 interacts with Ten1 and carries out its essential capping function. The C terminus of Stn1 binds both Cdc13 and Pol12, and we present genetic data indicating that the Stn1–Cdc13 interaction is required to limit continuous telomerase action. Stn1 telomere association, similar to that of Cdc13, peaks during S phase. Significantly, the magnitude of Stn1 telomere binding is independent of telomere TG tract length, suggesting that the negative effect of Stn1 on telomerase action might be regulated by a modification of CST activity or structure in cis at individual telomeres. Genetic analysis suggests that the Tel1 kinase exerts an effect in parallel with the Stn1 C terminus to counteract its inhibition of telomerase. These data provide new insights into the coordination of telomere capping and telomerase regulation.     

Tel2p, a regulator of yeast telomeric length in vivo, binds to single-stranded telomeric DNA in vitro

The telomeres of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae consist of a duplex region of TG_1–3 repeats that acquire a single-stranded 3’ extension of the TG_1–3 strand at the end of S-phase. The length of these repeats is kept within a defined range by regulators such as the TEL2-encoded protein (Tel2p). Here we show that Tel2p can specifically bind to single-stranded TG_1–3. Tel2p binding produced several shifted bands; however, only the slowest migrating band contained Tel2p. Methylation protection and interference experiments as well as gel shift experiments using inosine-containing probes indicated that the faster migrating bands resulted from Tel2p-mediated formation of DNA secondary structures held together by G-G interactions. Tel2p bound to single-stranded substrates that were at least 19 bases in length and contained 14 bases of TG_1–3, and also to double-stranded/single-stranded hybrid substrates with a 3’ TG_1–3 overhang. Tel2p binding to a hybrid substrate with a 24 base single-stranded TG_1–3 extension also produced a band characteristic of G-G-mediated secondary structures. These data suggest that Tel2p could regulate telomeric length by binding to the 3’ single-stranded TG_1–3 extension present at yeast telomeres. Received: 12 November 1998; in revised form: 6 April 1999 / Accepted: 13 April 1999     

Quantitative amplification of single-stranded DNA (QAOS) demonstrates that cdc13-1 mutants generate ssDNA in a telomere to centromere direction

We have developed a method that allows quantitative amplification of single-stranded DNA (QAOS) in a sample that is primarily double-stranded DNA (dsDNA). Single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) is first captured by annealing a tagging primer at low temperature. Primer extension follows to create a novel, ssDNA-dependent, tagged molecule that can be detected by PCR. Using QAOS levels of between 0.2 and 100% ssDNA can be accurately quantified. We have used QAOS to characterise ssDNA levels at three loci near the right telomere of chromosome V in budding yeast cdc13-1 mutants. Our results confirm and extend previous studies which demonstrate that when Cdc13p, a telomere-binding protein, is disabled, loci close to the telomere become single stranded whereas centromere proximal sequences do not. In contrast to an earlier model, our new results are consistent with a model in which a RAD24-dependent, 5′ to 3′ exonuclease moves from the telomere toward the centromere in cdc13-1 mutants. QAOS has been adapted, using degenerate tagging primers, to preferentially amplify all ssDNA sequences within samples that are primarily dsDNA. This approach may be useful for identifying ssDNA sequences associated with physiological or pathological states in other organisms.     

Sequential Loading of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ku and Cdc13p to Telomeres

Ku is a heterodimeric protein involved in nonhomologous end-joining of the DNA double-stranded break repair pathway. It binds to the double-stranded DNA ends and then activates a series of repair enzymes that join the broken DNA. In addition to its function in DNA repair, the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ku (Yku) is also a component of telomere protein-DNA complexes that affect telomere function. The yeast telomeres are composed of duplex C_1–3(A/T)G_1–3 telomeric DNA repeats plus single-stranded TG_1–3 telomeric DNA tails. Here we show that Yku is capable of binding to a tailed-duplex DNA formed by telomeric DNA that mimics the structure of telomeres. Addition of Cdc13p, a single-stranded telomeric DNA-binding protein, to the Yku-DNA complex enables the formation of a ternary complex with Cdc13p binding to the single-stranded tail of the DNA substrate. Because pre-loading of Cdc13p to the single-stranded telomeric tail inhibits the binding of Yku, the results suggested that loading of Yku and Cdc13p to telomeres is sequential. Through generating a double-stranded break near telomeric DNA sequences, we found that Ku protein appears to bind to the de novo synthesized telomeres earlier than that of Cdc13p in vivo. Thus, our results indicated that Yku interacts directly with telomeres and that sequential loading of Yku followed by Cdc13p to telomeres is required for both proteins to form a ternary complex on telomeres. Our results also offer a mechanism that the binding of Cdc13p to telomeres might prevent Yku from initiating DNA double-stranded break repair pathway on telomeres.DNA damages in the form of double-stranded breaks (DSBs)⁴ compromise the integrity of genomes. Failure in repairing or mis-repairing double-stranded breaks can lead to chromosome instability and eventually cell death or cancer (1). Double-stranded breaks are repaired by two main pathways, the homologous recombination and nonhomologous DNA end-joining. In nonhomologous DNA end-joining, Ku is the first protein to bind to the DNA ends to initiate the repair pathway (2). Upon binding, Ku then recruits a series of repair enzymes to join the broken ends (2). Ku is a heterodimeric protein composed of 70- and ∼80-kDa subunits. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Ku includes Yku70 and Yku80 subunits. Because the biochemical configuration of the broken ends could be very diverse on DSBs, Ku binds to double-stranded ends in a sequence- and energy-independent manner. It is capable of binding to DNA ends with blunt 3′-overhangs or 5′-overhangs as well as double-stranded DNA with nicks, gaps, or internal loops (3–7). However, Ku does not have high affinity to single-stranded DNA. The crystal structure of human Ku heterodimer indicates that it forms a ring structure that encircles duplex DNA (7). This unique structure feature enables Ku to recognize DNA ends and achieves its high affinity binding.In additional to the role in double-stranded break repair, Ku was shown to be a component of telomeric protein-DNA complex in yeast and mammals (8–10). Telomeres are terminal structures of chromosomes composed of short tandem repeated sequences (11, 12). Mutation of YKU70 or YKU80 causes defects in telomere structure (13–15), telomere silencing (16–19), and replication timing of telomeres (20). The function of yeast Ku (Yku) on telomeres could mediate through protein-protein interaction with Sir4p or protein-RNA interaction with Tlc1 RNA (21, 22). For example, through the interaction with Sir4p, Yku selectively affects telomeres silencing but not the silent mating type loci (17). Yku could also bind to telomerase Tlc1 RNA for telomere length maintenance (22). Judged by the DNA binding activity of Yku, it is reasonable to suggest that it may bind directly to telomeric DNA. Indeed, it was shown that human Ku is capable of binding directly to telomeric DNA in vitro (15). Moreover, because the deletion of SIR4 in budding yeast (23) or Taz1 in fission yeast (24) does not abolish the association of Ku with chromosomal ends, this suggests that Ku might bind directly to telomeric DNA in cells. However, because yeast telomeres have a short 12–14-mer single-stranded tail (25), it is uncertain whether Yku could pass the single-stranded region to reach its binding site. The direct binding of Yku to telomeric DNA has not been experimentally determined.In contrast to double-stranded breaks, the ends of linear chromosomes are not recognized by repair enzymes as DNA damage. In S. cerevisiae, Cdc13p is the single-stranded TG_1–3 DNA-binding protein that enables cells to differentiate whether the ends of a linear DNA are telomeres or broken ends (26–29). Thus, although the mechanism of how cells prevent the activation of DSB repair pathway in telomere is unclear, it is likely that binding of Cdc13p to telomeres might inhibit the initiation of DNA damage response by the Ku protein. Here, using a tailed-duplex DNA synthesized by telomeric DNA sequences to mimic telomere structure, we showed that Yku binds directly to this tailed-duplex DNA substrate and forms a ternary complex with Cdc13p. Our results also showed that Yku loaded to a de novo synthesized telomere earlier than Cdc13p in vivo. These results support the direct binding of Yku to telomeric DNA and that the spatial orientation of Cdc13p might block the activation of DSB repair pathway on telomeres.     

The Telomere Capping Complex CST Has an Unusual Stoichiometry,Makes Multipartite Interaction with G-Tails,and Unfolds Higher-Order G-Tail Structures

The telomere-ending binding protein complex CST (Cdc13-Stn1-Ten1) mediates critical functions in both telomere protection and replication. We devised a co-expression and affinity purification strategy for isolating large quantities of the complete Candida glabrata CST complex. The complex was found to exhibit a 2∶4∶2 or 2∶6∶2 stoichiometry as judged by the ratio of the subunits and the native size of the complex. Stn1, but not Ten1 alone, can directly and stably interact with Cdc13. In gel mobility shift assays, both Cdc13 and CST manifested high-affinity and sequence-specific binding to the cognate telomeric repeats. Single molecule FRET-based analysis indicates that Cdc13 and CST can bind and unfold higher order G-tail structures. The protein and the complex can also interact with non-telomeric DNA in the absence of high-affinity target sites. Comparison of the DNA–protein complexes formed by Cdc13 and CST suggests that the latter can occupy a longer DNA target site and that Stn1 and Ten1 may contact DNA directly in the full CST–DNA assembly. Both Stn1 and Ten1 can be cross-linked to photo-reactive telomeric DNA. Mutating residues on the putative DNA–binding surface of Candida albicans Stn1 OB fold domain caused a reduction in its crosslinking efficiency in vitro and engendered long and heterogeneous telomeres in vivo, indicating that the DNA–binding activity of Stn1 is required for telomere protection. Our data provide insights on the assembly and mechanisms of CST, and our robust reconstitution system will facilitate future biochemical analysis of this important complex.     

Sensitivity of yeast strains with long G-tails to levels of telomere-bound telomerase

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pif1p helicase is a negative regulator of telomere length that acts by removing telomerase from chromosome ends. The catalytic subunit of yeast telomerase, Est2p, is telomere associated throughout most of the cell cycle, with peaks of association in both G1 phase (when telomerase is not active) and late S/G2 phase (when telomerase is active). The G1 association of Est2p requires a specific interaction between Ku and telomerase RNA. In mutants lacking this interaction, telomeres were longer in the absence of Pif1p than in the presence of wild-type PIF1, indicating that endogenous Pif1p inhibits the active S/G2 form of telomerase. Pif1p abundance was cell cycle regulated, low in G1 and early S phase and peaking late in the cell cycle. Low Pif1p abundance in G1 phase was anaphase-promoting complex dependent. Thus, endogenous Pif1p is unlikely to act on G1 bound Est2p. Overexpression of Pif1p from a non-cell cycle-regulated promoter dramatically reduced viability in five strains with impaired end protection (cdc13–1, yku80Δ, yku70Δ, yku80–1, and yku80–4), all of which have longer single-strand G-tails than wild-type cells. This reduced viability was suppressed by deleting the EXO1 gene, which encodes a nuclease that acts at compromised telomeres, suggesting that the removal of telomerase by Pif1p exposed telomeres to further C-strand degradation. Consistent with this interpretation, depletion of Pif1p, which increases the amount of telomere-bound telomerase, suppressed the temperature sensitivity of yku70Δ and cdc13–1 cells. Furthermore, eliminating the pathway that recruits Est2p to telomeres in G1 phase in a cdc13–1 strain also reduced viability. These data suggest that wild-type levels of telomere-bound telomerase are critical for the viability of strains whose telomeres are already susceptible to degradation.     

RPA-like proteins mediate yeast telomere function

Cdc13, Stn1 and Ten1 are essential yeast proteins that both protect chromosome termini from unregulated resection and regulate telomere length. Cdc13, which localizes to telomeres through high-affinity binding to telomeric single-stranded DNA, has been extensively characterized, whereas the contribution(s) of the Cdc13-associated Stn1 and Ten1 proteins to telomere function have remained unclear. We show here that Stn1 and Ten1 are DNA-binding proteins with specificity for telomeric DNA substrates. Furthermore, Stn1 and Ten1 show similarities to Rpa2 and Rpa3, subunits of the heterotrimeric replication protein A (RPA) complex, which is the major single-stranded DNA-binding activity in eukaryotic cells. We propose that Cdc13, Stn1 and Ten1 function as a telomere-specific RPA-like complex. Identification of an RPA-like complex that is targeted to a specific region of the genome suggests that multiple RPA-like complexes have evolved, each making individual contributions to genomic stability.     

“Poisoning” yeast telomeres distinguishes between redundant telomere capping pathways

In most eukaryotes, telomeres are composed of tandem arrays of species-specific DNA repeats ending with a G-rich 3′ overhang. In budding yeast, Cdc13 binds this overhang and recruits Ten1–Stn1 and the telomerase protein Est1 to protect (cap) and elongate the telomeres, respectively. To dissect and study the various pathways employed to cap and maintain the telomere end, we engineered telomerase to incorporate Tetrahymena telomeric repeats (G₄T₂) onto the telomeres of the budding yeast Kluyveromyces lactis. These heterologous repeats caused telomere–telomere fusions, cell cycle arrest at G2/M, and severely reduced viability—the hallmarks of telomere uncapping. Fusing Cdc13 or Est1 to universal minicircle sequence binding protein (UMSBP), a small protein that binds the single-stranded G₄T₂ repeats, rescued the cell viability and restored telomere capping, but not telomerase-mediated telomere maintenance. Surprisingly, Cdc13–UMSBP-mediated telomere capping was dependent on the homologous recombination factor Rad52, while Est1–UMSBP was not. Thus, our results distinguish between two, redundant, telomere capping pathways.     

Combinatorial recognition of a complex telomere repeat sequence by the Candida parapsilosis Cdc13AB heterodimer

The telomere repeat units of Candida species are substantially longer and more complex than those in other organisms, raising interesting questions concerning the recognition mechanisms of telomere-binding proteins. Herein we characterized the properties of Candida parapsilosis Cdc13A and Cdc13B, two paralogs that are responsible for binding and protecting the telomere G-strand tails. We found that Cdc13A and Cdc13B can each form complexes with itself and a heterodimeric complex with each other. However, only the heterodimer exhibits high-affinity and sequence-specific binding to the telomere G-tail. EMSA and crosslinking analysis revealed a combinatorial mechanism of DNA recognition, which entails the A and B subunit making contacts to the 3′ and 5′ region of the repeat unit. While both the DBD and OB4 domain of Cdc13A can bind to the equivalent domain in Cdc13B, only the OB4 complex behaves as a stable heterodimer. The unstable Cdc13AB_DBD complex binds G-strand with greatly reduced affinity but the same sequence specificity. Thus the OB4 domains evidently contribute to binding by promoting dimerization of the DBDs. Our investigation reveals a rare example of combinatorial recognition of single-stranded DNA and offers insights into the co-evolution of telomere DNA and cognate binding proteins.     

TEN1 Is Essential for CDC13-Mediated Telomere Capping

Telomere binding proteins protect chromosome ends from degradation and mask chromosome termini from checkpoint surveillance. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Cdc13 binds single-stranded G-rich telomere repeats, maintaining telomere integrity and length. Two additional proteins, Ten1 and Stn1, interact with Cdc13 but their contributions to telomere integrity are not well defined. Ten1 is known to prevent accumulation of aberrant single-stranded telomere DNA; whether this results from defective end protection or defective telomere replication is unclear. Here we report our analysis of a new group of ten1 temperature-sensitive (ts) mutants. At permissive temperatures, ten1-ts strains display greatly elongated telomeres. After shift to nonpermissive conditions, however, ten1-ts mutants accumulate extensive telomeric single-stranded DNA. Cdk1 activity is required to generate these single-stranded regions, and deleting the EXO1 nuclease partially suppresses ten1-ts growth defects. This is similar to cdc13-1 mutants, suggesting ten1-ts strains are defective for end protection. Moreover, like Cdc13, our analysis reveals Ten1 promotes de novo telomere addition. Interestingly, in ten1-ts strains at high temperatures, telomeric single-stranded DNA and Rad52-YFP repair foci are strongly induced despite Cdc13 remaining associated with telomeres, revealing Cdc13 telomere binding is not sufficient for end protection. Finally, unlike cdc13-1 mutants, ten1-ts strains display strong synthetic interactions with mutations in the POLα complex. These results emphasize that Cdc13 relies on Ten1 to execute its essential function, but leave open the possibility that Ten1 has a Cdc13-independent role in DNA replication.GENOME stability is critically dependent upon functional telomeres. DNA ends that lack telomeres, or that have dysfunctional telomeres, are metabolized by DNA repair processes; without an appropriate repair template, such chromosome ends can be resected or joined inappropriately with other chromosome ends. Thus, genomic integrity can be significantly compromised by telomere dysfunction, particularly in proliferating cells where cycles of instability may ensue due to creation of dicentric chromosomes (Bailey and Murnane 2006). Protein complexes that bind to the duplex and single-stranded telomere repeats are key for stabilizing the chromosome ends (de Lange 2005). In proliferating cells, this job is complicated not only because the terminal chromatin must be opened during the process of chromosome replication, but also because additional processes that metabolize DNA ends are active. For example, while nonhomologous end joining processes are preferentially used in repair of DNA double-strand breaks in G1, homologous recombination is preferentially used for this repair in S and G2 (Ferreira and Cooper 2004; Zierhut and Diffley 2008). Given these complexities, it is not surprising that our molecular understanding of how telomere proteins protect chromosomes ends is incomplete.Budding yeast has been useful for dissecting how cells correctly metabolize their chromosome ends. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the terminal DNA comprises approximately 300 bp of TG_1-3/C_1-3A sequences, ending with a short single-stranded overhang of the G-rich repeats. This 3′ overhang is ∼12–14 nucleotides, although during the late S/G2 phase of the cell cycle, it becomes longer, >30 nucleotides in length (Wellinger et al. 1993b; Dionne and Wellinger 1996; Larrivee et al. 2004). Central among factors that prevent inappropriate telomere degradation in S. cerevisiae is Cdc13, a protein that binds to single-stranded telomere G-rich repeats (Garvik et al. 1995; Lin and Zakian 1996; Nugent et al. 1996). Reducing Cdc13 function through either the cdc13-1 temperature sensitive (ts) allele or the cdc13-td conditional null (degron) allele results in telomere C-strand loss, with degradation continuing into the subtelomeric chromosomal regions (Garvik et al. 1995; Vodenicharov and Wellinger 2006). Correspondingly, homologous recombination at chromosome termini increases in cdc13-1 strains (Carson and Hartwell 1985; Garvik et al. 1995). The loss of Cdc13 unmasks the telomeres, provoking activation of the DNA damage checkpoint (Weinert and Hartwell 1993; Garvik et al. 1995). This protective role of Cdc13 is most likely its essential function.A thorough, mechanistic understanding of how Cdc13 mediates chromosome end protection is hampered in part because the activities responsible for the loss of the telomere C strand are not fully known. At normal telomeres, the Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 complex has a role regulating resection required for telomere addition, whereas the Exo1 nuclease, Rad9 and Rad24 checkpoint proteins each influence the resection process at uncapped telomeres (Lydall and Weinert 1995; Maringele and Lydall 2002; Larrivee et al. 2004; Zubko et al. 2004). The 5′-to-3′ resection of both normal and uncapped telomeres is regulated by the activity of Cdk1, the yeast cyclin-dependent kinase (Frank et al. 2006; Vodenicharov and Wellinger 2006). Similar to the activities that promote 5′-to-3′ degradation of DNA ends at double-strand breaks (Aylon et al. 2004; Ira et al. 2004), the activities that lead to telomere resection are active in late S and G2 cell cycle phases (Wellinger et al. 1993a, 1996; Marcand et al. 2000; Vodenicharov and Wellinger 2006). Interestingly, Cdc13 is required to prevent degradation at telomeres only in proliferating cells and not when cells are blocked in stationary phase (Vodenicharov and Wellinger 2006). Additional factors, such as the S. cerevisiae Rap1 protein, prevent chromosome fusions by nonhomologous recombination during the G1 phase of the cell cycle (Pardo and Marcand 2005; Marcand et al. 2008).At least two additional proteins, Stn1 and Ten1, aid the capping role of Cdc13. Like CDC13, both STN1 and TEN1 are essential, and loss of their function leads to excessive single-stranded telomeric DNA (Grandin et al. 1997, 2001; Petreaca et al. 2007). STN1 was originally identified as a high copy suppressor of cdc13-1 temperature sensitivity (Grandin et al. 1997), and TEN1 was similarly isolated as a dosage suppressor of stn1-13 (Grandin et al. 2001). Combining either the cdc13-1 allele with stn1 mutations or the ten1-31 allele with stn1-13 is lethal (Grandin et al. 2001; Petreaca et al. 2007). The essential nature of these genes makes it difficult to clearly differentiate whether these genes operate in the same, or in parallel pathways to protect telomeres. A compelling argument that Cdc13, Stn1, and Ten1 likely function in a common pathway is that, in addition to these genetic interactions, Stn1 and Ten1 proteins interact with one another both in vivo and in vitro (Grandin et al. 2001; Gao et al. 2007), and each associates with Cdc13 in the yeast two-hybrid assay (Grandin et al. 1997, 2001; Petreaca et al. 2007). From these data, Cdc13, Stn1, and Ten1 are suggested to function as a single complex that mediates chromosome end protection in S. cerevisiae. Such a complex would share some similarities with the single-stranded DNA binding complex RPA (Gao et al. 2007). Whether these proteins normally operate exclusively as a heterotrimeric complex is still not entirely clear. Stn1 and Ten1 can make contributions to capping that are independent of Cdc13, as shown in experiments where overproducing the Stn1 essential domain with Ten1 replaced the essential function of Cdc13 (Petreaca et al. 2006). In addition, while the Schizosaccharomyces pombe Stn1 and Ten1 homologs are critical for telomere protection, they do not interact with Pot1, the single-stranded telomere binding protein that is also critical for telomere capping (Martin et al. 2007).The role of Ten1 in maintaining both telomere integrity and length homeostasis is not understood. It has been assumed that Stn1 and Ten1 play the same role as Cdc13 in maintaining telomere integrity, namely, preventing inappropriate terminal resection. However, whether this is in fact the case is not entirely clear. For one, disrupting the DNA replication machinery can give rise to an excess of terminal single-stranded DNA, although in this case, the ssDNA accumulation is attributed to a failure to synthesize the lagging DNA strand rather than removing a block to telomere resection (Diede and Gottschling 1999; Adams Martin et al. 2000). Although both Cdc13 and Stn1 are thought to act as capping proteins, each can interact with Polα subunits (Qi et al. 2003; Grossi et al. 2004; Petreaca et al. 2006), making it important to evaluate Ten1 function more carefully. Our goal here was to compare how Cdc13 and Ten1 promote chromosome end protection, first by testing whether Ten1 acts to prevent telomere resection from activities comparable to those that degrade telomeres in cdc13-1, and second by determining the impact of ten1 dysfunction upon Cdc13. The cdc13-1 allele has been extremely useful in analyzing the CDC13 essential function; TEN1 analysis has been hindered by a lack of equivalent genetic reagents. Here we have created a collection of ten1-ts alleles useful for probing the essential role of TEN1. Analysis of these alleles, which show constitutive telomere elongation, reveals that Ten1 promotes telomere capping with a similar cell cycle dependency as Cdc13, protecting ends during the period in which mitotic forms of Cdk1 are active. Critically, by showing that single-stranded DNA is generated in ten1-ts strains under conditions where semi-conservative replication is complete, we conclude that Ten1 truly can function as a capping protein. Moreover, the ten1-ts strains fail to restrain degradation of chromosome ends and induce formation of Rad52 repair foci, despite the association of wild-type Cdc13 with telomeres, indicating not only that Cdc13 binds telomeres independent of Ten1 function, but also that Cdc13 telomere localization is not sufficient for end protection. Finally, although the ten1-ts capping-deficient phenotypes parallel cdc13-1, only the ten1-ts strains are highly sensitive to impaired POL1 function, leaving open the possibility that TEN1 function additionally impacts terminal replication.     

Exposure of single-stranded telomeric DNA causes G2/M cell cycle arrest in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Cdc13p is a single-stranded TG(1-3) DNA binding protein that protects telomeres and maintains telomere length. A mutant allele of CDC13, cdc13-1, causes accumulation of single-stranded TG(1-3) DNA near telomeres along with a G(2)/M cell cycle arrest at non-permissive temperatures. We report here that when the single-stranded TG(1-3) DNA is masked by its binding proteins, such as S. cerevisiae Gbp2p or Schizosaccharomyces pombe Tcg1, the growth arrest phenotype of cdc13-1 is rescued. Mutations on Gbp2p that disrupt its binding to the single-stranded TG(1-3) DNA render the protein unable to complement the defects of cdc13-1. These results indicate that the presence of a single-stranded TG(1-3) tail in cdc13-1 cells serves as the signal for the cell cycle checkpoint. Moreover, the binding activity of Gbp2p to single-stranded TG(1-3) DNA appears to be associated with its ability to restore the telomere-lengthening phenotype in cdc13-1 cells. These results indicate that Gbp2p is involved in modulating telomere length.     

Ten1 functions in telomere end protection and length regulation in association with Stn1 and Cdc13

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Cdc13 has been proposed to mediate telomerase recruitment at telomere ends. Stn1, which associates with Cdc13 by the two-hybrid interaction, has been implicated in telomere maintenance. Ten1, a previously uncharacterized protein, was found to associate physically with both Stn1 and Cdc13. A binding defect between Stn1-13 and Ten1 was responsible for the long telomere phenotype of stn1-13 mutant cells. Moreover, rescue of the cdc13-1 mutation by STN1 was much improved when TEN1 was simultaneously overexpressed. Several ten1 mutations were found to confer telomerase-dependent telomere lengthening. Other, temperature-sensitive, mutants of TEN1 arrested at G(2)/M via activation of the Rad9-dependent DNA damage checkpoint. These ten1 mutant cells were found to accumulate single-stranded DNA in telomeric regions of the chromosomes. We propose that Ten1 is required to regulate telomere length, as well as to prevent lethal damage to telomeric DNA.     

The Yeast Centrin,Cdc31p,and the Interacting Protein Kinase,Kic1p,Are Required for Cell Integrity

Cdc31p is the yeast homologue of centrin, a highly conserved calcium-binding protein of the calmodulin superfamily. Previously centrins have been implicated only in microtubule-based processes. To elucidate the functions of yeast centrin, we carried out a two-hybrid screen for Cdc31p-interacting proteins and identified a novel essential protein kinase of 1,080 residues, Kic1p (kinase that interacts with Cdc31p). Kic1p is closely related to S. cerevisiae Ste20p and the p-21– activated kinases (PAKs) found in a wide variety of eukaryotic organisms. Cdc31p physically interacts with Kic1p by two criteria; Cdc31p coprecipitated with GST–Kic1p and it bound to GST–Kic1p in gel overlay assays. Furthermore, GST–Kic1p exhibited in vitro kinase activity that was CDC31-dependent. Although kic1 mutants were not defective for spindle pole body duplication, they exhibited a variety of mutant phenotypes demonstrating that Kic1p is required for cell integrity. We also found that cdc31 mutants, previously identified as defective for spindle pole body duplication, exhibited lysis and morphological defects. The cdc31 kic1 double mutants exhibited a drastic reduction in the range of permissive temperature, resulting in a severe lysis defect. We conclude that Kic1p function is dependent upon Cdc31p both in vivo and in vitro. We postulate that Cdc31p is required both for SPB duplication and for cell integrity/morphogenesis, and that the integrity/morphogenesis function is mediated through the Kic1p protein kinase.     

Survival and Growth of Yeast without Telomere Capping by Cdc13 in the Absence of Sgs1, Exo1, and Rad9

Maintenance of telomere capping is absolutely essential to the survival of eukaryotic cells. Telomere capping proteins, such as Cdc13 and POT1, are essential for the viability of budding yeast and mammalian cells, respectively. Here we identify, for the first time, three genetic modifications that allow budding yeast cells to survive without telomere capping by Cdc13. We found that simultaneous inactivation of Sgs1, Exo1, and Rad9, three DNA damage response (DDR) proteins, is sufficient to allow cell division in the absence of Cdc13. Quantitative amplification of ssDNA (QAOS) was used to show that the RecQ helicase Sgs1 plays an important role in the resection of uncapped telomeres, especially in the absence of checkpoint protein Rad9. Strikingly, simultaneous deletion of SGS1 and the nuclease EXO1, further reduces resection at uncapped telomeres and together with deletion of RAD9 permits cell survival without CDC13. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis studies show that cdc13-1 rad9Δ sgs1Δ exo1Δ strains can maintain linear chromosomes despite the absence of telomere capping by Cdc13. However, with continued passage, the telomeres of such strains eventually become short and are maintained by recombination-based mechanisms. Remarkably, cdc13Δ rad9Δ sgs1Δ exo1Δ strains, lacking any Cdc13 gene product, are viable and can grow indefinitely. Our work has uncovered a critical role for RecQ helicases in limiting the division of cells with uncapped telomeres, and this may provide one explanation for increased tumorigenesis in human diseases associated with mutations of RecQ helicases. Our results reveal the plasticity of the telomere cap and indicate that the essential role of telomere capping is to counteract specific aspects of the DDR.