Circadian clocks in mouse and human CD4+ T cells

Though it has been shown that immunological functions of CD4+ T cells are time of day-dependent, the underlying molecular mechanisms remain largely obscure. To address the question whether T cells themselves harbor a functional clock driving circadian rhythms of immune function, we analyzed clock gene expression by qPCR in unstimulated CD4+ T cells and immune responses of PMA/ionomycin stimulated CD4+ T cells by FACS analysis purified from blood of healthy subjects at different time points throughout the day. Molecular clock as well as immune function was further analyzed in unstimulated T cells which were cultured in serum-free medium with circadian clock reporter systems. We found robust rhythms of clock gene expression as well as, after stimulation, IL-2, IL-4, IFN-γ production and CD40L expression in freshly isolated CD4+ T cells. Further analysis of IFN-γ and CD40L in cultivated T cells revealed that these parameters remain rhythmic in vitro. Moreover, circadian luciferase reporter activity in CD4+ T cells and in thymic sections from PER2::LUCIFERASE reporter mice suggest that endogenous T cell clock rhythms are self-sustained under constant culture conditions. Microarray analysis of stimulated CD4+ T cell cultures revealed regulation of the NF-κB pathway as a candidate mechanism mediating circadian immune responses. Collectively, these data demonstrate for the first time that CD4+ T cell responses are regulated by an intrinsic cellular circadian oscillator capable of driving rhythmic CD4+ T cell immune responses.     

Pineal regulation of circadian rhythms of 2-deoxy[14C]glucose uptake and 2[125I]iodomelatonin binding in the visual system of the house sparrow,Passer domesticus

The pineal gland and its hormone melatonin are crucial for the generation of circadian rhythms in several species of passerine birds. The sites and mechanisms by which they influence avian behavior are therefore of particular interest. Recent research employing several brain imaging techniques has indicated that the sites of melatonin action within the avian brain are wide-spread within the 4 major visual pathways. In this study, we have investigated whether the avian homologue of the mammalian suprachiasmatic nucleus, the visual suprachiasmatic nucleus (vSCN), and other visually sensitive structures express circadian rhythms of 2-deoxy[¹⁴C]glucose (2DG) uptake and 2[¹²⁵I]iodomelatonin (IMEL) binding in house sparrows,Passer domesticus, under constant environmental conditions in the presence or absence of the pineal gland. The results indicate that 2DG uptake in the vSCN is oscillatory in sham-operated sparrows but damps to arrhythmicity in pinealectomized birds, suggesting this structure contains a damped circadian oscillator independent of pineal input. We have also asked whether IMEL binding is rhythmic under these conditions in the same brains. These results indicate IMEL binding is rhythmic in several structures in the circadian, tectofugal, thalamofugal visual pathways and that pinealectomy increases the level of IMEL binding 2–4 fold suggesting that IMEL binding is down regulated by endogenous melatonin. However, the circadian rhythm of this binding is only gradually abolished, suggesting it too is regulated by a non-pineal circadian clock. These data are discussed in the context of the behavioral neurobiology of avian circadian systems and the neuroendocrine loop model.     

Expression of clock genes in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells throughout the sleep/wake and circadian cycles

The rhythmic expression of circadian clock genes in the neurons of the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) underlies the manifestation of endogenous circadian rhythmicity in behavior and physiology. Recent evidence demonstrating rhythmic clock gene expression in non-SCN tissues suggests that functional clocks exist outside the central circadian pacemaker of the brain. In this investigation, the nature of an oscillator in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) is evaluated by assessing clock gene expression throughout both a typical sleep/wake cycle (LD) and during a constant routine (CR). Six healthy men and women aged (mean±SEM) 23.7±1.6 yrs participated in this five-day investigation in temporal isolation. Core body temperature and plasma melatonin concentration were measured as markers of the central circadian pacemaker. The expression of HPER1, HPER2, and HBMAL1 was quantified in PBMCs sampled throughout an uninterrupted 72 h period. The core body temperature minimum and the midpoint of melatonin concentration measured during the CR occurred 2:17±0:20 and 3:24 ±0:09 h before habitual awakening, respectively, and were well aligned to the sleep/wake cycle. HPER1 and HPER2 expression in PBMCs demonstrated significant circadian rhythmicity that peaked early after wake-time and was comparable under LD and CR conditions. HBMAL1 expression was more variable, and peaked in the middle of the wake period under LD conditions and during the habitual sleep period under CR conditions. For the first time, bi-hourly sampling over three consecutive days is used to compare clock gene expression in a human peripheral oscillator under different sleep/wake conditions.     

LIGHT-REGULATED WD1 and PSEUDO-RESPONSE REGULATOR9 form a positive feedback regulatory loop in the Arabidopsis circadian clock

In Arabidopsis thaliana, central circadian clock genes constitute several feedback loops. These interlocking loops generate an ~24-h oscillation that enables plants to anticipate the daily diurnal environment. The identification of additional clock proteins can help dissect the complex nature of the circadian clock. Previously, LIGHT-REGULATED WD1 (LWD1) and LWD2 were identified as two clock proteins regulating circadian period length and photoperiodic flowering. Here, we systematically studied the function of LWD1/2 in the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Analysis of the lwd1 lwd2 double mutant revealed that LWD1/2 plays dual functions in the light input pathway and the regulation of the central oscillator. Promoter:luciferase fusion studies showed that activities of LWD1/2 promoters are rhythmic and depend on functional PSEUDO-RESPONSE REGULATOR9 (PRR9) and PRR7. LWD1/2 is also needed for the expression of PRR9, PRR7, and PRR5. LWD1 is preferentially localized within the nucleus and associates with promoters of PRR9, PRR5, and TOC1 in vivo. Our results support the existence of a positive feedback loop within the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Further mechanistic studies of this positive feedback loop and its regulatory effects on the other clock components will further elucidate the complex nature of the Arabidopsis circadian clock.