Promoters and regulatory elements that improve adeno-associated virus transgene expression in the brain

Since the first demonstration of central nervous system (CNS) transduction with recombinant adeno-associated virus, improvements in vector production and promoter strength have lead to dramatic increases in the number of cells transduced and the level of expression within each cell. The improvements in promoter strength have resulted from a move away from the original cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter toward the use of hybrid CMV-based promoters and constitutive cellular promoters. This review summarizes and compares different promoters and regulatory elements that have been used with rAAV as a reference toward achieving a high level of rAAV-mediated transgene expression in the CNS.     

Global and regional brain metabolic scaling and its functional consequences

Background  

Information processing in the brain requires large amounts of metabolic energy, the spatial distribution of which is highly heterogeneous, reflecting the complex activity patterns in the mammalian brain.     

Cloning a promoter that puts the expression of tetracycline resistance under the control of the regulatory elements of the mer operon

We have sub-cloned from the Eco RI-H fragments of the IncFII plasmid R100 a 260-bp EcoRI fragment, using the promoter-cloning vehicle, pBRH4, (The Inc FII plasmid codes for the mer operon, and pBRH4 expresses tetracycline resistance only when the deleted tet promoter has been replaced by another sequence that can serve as a promotor). With the 260-bp fragment inserted, the derivative plasmid, pFB4, directs the expression of tetracycline resistance only if there is a second plasmid in the strain that carries the merR-positive regulatory element. Under these conditions, the level of tetracycline resistance is directly proportional to the concentration of Hg2+ present in the medium. The 260-bp fragment also allows low-level constitutive expression of tet resistance when transactivated with merR mutants that have a "micro-constitutive" phenotype. The 260-bp mer promoter fragment contains a single HincII site; there is also but one HincII site in the EcoRI-H fragment of R100 from which the promoter fragment was derived. Restriction analysis of purified Eco RI-H DNA shows that the single HincII site is at 550 bp from the "right"terminus of the IS1b element, which is also present in the EcoRI-H fragment. Because of its biological activity and its location within the "H" fragment, this promoter is very likely a promoter for the structural genes of the operon.     

Distinct distal regulatory elements control tyrosinase expression in melanocytes and the retinal pigment epithelium

Pigment cells of mammals are characterized by two different developmental origins: cells of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) originate from the optic cup of the developing forebrain, whereas melanocytes arise from the neural crest. The pigmentation gene tyrosinase is expressed in all pigment cells but differentially regulated in melanocytes and RPE. The tyrosinase promoter does not confer strong expression in pigment cells in vivo, while inclusion of a distal regulatory element at position -15 kb is necessary and sufficient to provide strong expression in melanocytes. Nevertheless, the regulatory elements responsible for correct spatial and temporal tyrosinase expression in the RPE remained unidentified so far. In this report, we show that a 186 kb BAC containing the tyrosinase gene provides transgene expression in both RPE and melanocytes indicating the presence of regulatory sequences required for expression in the RPE. A deletion analysis of the BAC was performed demonstrating that a RPE-regulatory element resides between -17 and -75 kb. Using multi-species comparative genomic analysis we identified three conserved sequences within this region. When tested in transgenic mice one of these sequences located at -47 kb targeted expression to the RPE. In addition, deletion of this regulatory element within a tyrosinase::lacZ BAC provided evidence that this sequence is not only sufficient but also required for correct spatial and temporal expression in the RPE. The identification of this novel element demonstrates that tyrosinase gene expression is controlled by separate distal regulatory sequences in melanocytes and RPE.     

Two iron-responsive promoter elements control expression of FOX1 in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii

FOX1 encodes an iron deficiency-induced ferroxidase involved in a high-affinity iron uptake system. Mutagenesis analysis of the FOX1 promoter identified two separate iron-responsive elements, FeRE1 (CACACG) and FeRE2 (CACGCG), between positions -87 and -82 and between positions -65 and -60, respectively, and both are needed for induced FOX1 expression under conditions of iron deficiency.     

Comparative functional analysis of the cow and mouse myostatin genes reveals novel regulatory elements in their upstream promoter regions

Myostatin is a paracrine/autocrine factor that inhibits muscle growth, and mutations that affect myostatin activity or expression produce dramatic increases in muscle mass in several species. However, at present it is less clear whether differences in myostatin expression or activity exist between species with differing body sizes. Here we demonstrate that mouse muscle expresses far greater levels of myostatin mRNA than cow. In addition, activity of a 1200 bp mouse myostatin promoter construct was significantly greater than that of a 1200 bp cow myostatin promoter construct in C₂C₁₂ myotubes. In contrast, activity of reporter constructs flanked by one or both untranslated regions (UTRs) was not significantly different between the two species. Sequence analysis identified a number of promoter regions which differed between larger species (cow, pig, goat, sheep, human) and smaller (mouse, rat), including a TATA-box sequence, a CACCC box, two AT-rich regions (AT1 and AT2), and a palindromic sequence (PAL). We therefore used mutagenesis to alter the mouse sequence for each of these elements to that of the cow. Mutagenesis of the TATA, CACC, and AT1 sequences of the mouse to those of the cow significantly decreased activity of the mouse myostatin promoter compared to the wild type mouse promoter, while mutation of the AT2 and PAL sequences tended to increase promoter activity. Finally, the cow myostatin promoter was less responsive to FoxO signaling than the mouse myostatin promoter. Together these data support the hypothesis that differences in promoter activity between mouse and cow may contribute to differences in expression of the myostatin gene between these species.