Amyloids of shuffled prion domains that form prions have a parallel in-register beta-sheet structure

The [URE3] and [PSI (+)] prions of Saccharomyces cerevisiae are self-propagating amyloid forms of Ure2p and Sup35p, respectively. The Q/N-rich N-terminal domains of each protein are necessary and sufficient for the prion properties of these proteins, forming in each case their amyloid cores. Surprisingly, shuffling either prion domain, leaving amino acid content unchanged, does not abrogate the ability of the proteins to become prions. The discovery that the amino acid composition of a polypeptide, not the specific sequence order, determines prion capability seems contrary to the standard folding paradigm that amino acid sequence determines protein fold. The shuffleability of a prion domain further suggests that the beta-sheet structure is of the parallel in-register type, and indeed, the normal Ure2 and Sup35 prion domains have such a structure. We demonstrate that two shuffled Ure2 prion domains capable of being prions form parallel in-register beta-sheet structures, and our data indicate the same conclusion for a single shuffled Sup35 prion domain. This result confirms our inference that shuffleability indicates parallel in-register structure.     

Suppression of polyglutamine toxicity by the yeast Sup35 prion domain in Drosophila

The propensity of proteins to form beta-sheet-rich amyloid fibrils is related to a variety of biological phenomena, including a number of human neurodegenerative diseases and prions. A subset of amyloidogenic proteins forms amyloid fibrils through glutamine/asparagine (Q/N)-rich domains, such as pathogenic polyglutamine (poly(Q)) proteins involved in neurodegenerative disease, as well as yeast prions. In the former, the propensity of an expanded poly(Q) tract to abnormally fold confers toxicity on the respective protein, leading to neuronal dysfunction. In the latter, Q/N-rich prion domains mediate protein aggregation important for epigenetic regulation. Here, we investigated the relationship between the pathogenic ataxin-3 protein of the human disease spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 (SCA3) and the yeast prion Sup35, using Drosophila as a model system. We found that the capacity of the Sup35 prion domain to mediate protein aggregation is conserved in Drosophila. Although select yeast prions enhance poly(Q) toxicity in yeast, the Sup35N prion domain suppressed poly(Q) toxicity in the fly. Suppression required the oligopeptide repeat of the Sup35N prion domain, which is critical for prion properties in yeast. These results suggest a trans effect of prion domains on pathogenic poly(Q) disease proteins in a multicellular environment and raise the possibility that Drosophila may allow studies of prion mechanisms.     

Compositional Determinants of Prion Formation in Yeast

Numerous prions (infectious proteins) have been identified in yeast that result from the conversion of soluble proteins into β-sheet-rich amyloid-like protein aggregates. Yeast prion formation is driven primarily by amino acid composition. However, yeast prion domains are generally lacking in the bulky hydrophobic residues most strongly associated with amyloid formation and are instead enriched in glutamines and asparagines. Glutamine/asparagine-rich domains are thought to be involved in both disease-related and beneficial amyloid formation. These domains are overrepresented in eukaryotic genomes, but predictive methods have not yet been developed to efficiently distinguish between prion and nonprion glutamine/asparagine-rich domains. We have developed a novel in vivo assay to quantitatively assess how composition affects prion formation. Using our results, we have defined the compositional features that promote prion formation, allowing us to accurately distinguish between glutamine/asparagine-rich domains that can form prion-like aggregates and those that cannot. Additionally, our results explain why traditional amyloid prediction algorithms fail to accurately predict amyloid formation by the glutamine/asparagine-rich yeast prion domains.Amyloid fibers are associated with a large number of neurodegenerative diseases and systemic amyloidoses. Amyloid fibrils are rich in a cross-beta quaternary structure in which β-strands are perpendicular to the long axis of the fibril (8).[URE3] and [PSI⁺] are the prion (infectious protein) forms of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteins Ure2 and Sup35, respectively (61). Formation of both prions involves conversion of the native proteins into an infectious, amyloid form. Ure2 and Sup35 have served as powerful model systems for examining the basis for amyloid formation and propagation. Both proteins possess a well-ordered functional domain responsible for the normal function of the protein, while a functionally and structurally separate glutamine/asparagine (Q/N)-rich intrinsically disordered domain is necessary and sufficient for prion aggregation and propagation (4, 26, 27, 52, 53). Both proteins can form multiple prion variants, which are distinguished by the efficiency of prion propagation and by the precise structure of the amyloid core (14, 54).Five other prion proteins have also been identified in yeast: Rnq1 (13, 46), Swi1 (15), Cyc8 (33), Mca1 (30), and Mot3 (1). Numerous other proteins, including New1, contain domains that show prion activity when inserted in place of the Sup35 prion-forming domain (PFD) (1, 42). Each of these prion proteins contains a Q/N-rich PFD. Similar Q/N-rich domains are overrepresented in eukaryotic genomes (28), raising the intriguing possibility that prion-like structural conversions by Q/N-rich domains may be common in other eukaryotes. However, we currently have little ability to predict whether a given Q/N-rich domain can form prions.A variety of algorithms have been developed to predict a peptide''s propensity to form amyloid fibrils based on its amino acid sequence, including BETASCAN (6), TANGO (17), Zyggregator (51), SALSA (62), and PASTA (55). These algorithms have been successful at identifying regions prone to amyloid aggregation and predicting the effects of mutations on aggregation propensity for many amyloid-forming proteins. However, they have generally been quite ineffective for Q/N-rich amyloid domains such as the yeast PFDs. For example, using the statistical mechanics-based algorithm TANGO (17), which predicts aggregation propensity based on a peptide''s physicochemical properties, Linding et al. found that the Sup35 and Ure2 PFDs both completely lack predicted β-aggregation nuclei (24). Similarly, yeast PFDs are generally lacking in the hydrophobic residues predicted by algorithms such as Zyggregator to nucleate amyloid formation.Why are these algorithms so effective for many amyloid-forming proteins but not for yeast PFDs? For most amyloid proteins, amyloid formation is driven by short hydrophobic protein stretches, and increased hydrophobicity is correlated with an increased amyloid aggregation propensity (34). In contrast, the yeast PFDs are all highly polar domains, due largely to the high concentration of Q/N residues and the lack of hydrophobic residues. High Q/N content is clearly not a requirement for a domain to act as a prion in yeast, since neither the mammalian prion protein PrP nor the Podospora anserina prion protein HET-s is Q/N rich, yet fragments from both proteins can act as prions in yeast (49, 50). However, the significant compositional differences between the yeast PFDs and most other amyloid/prion proteins suggest that there may be two distinct classes of amyloid-forming proteins driven by different types of interactions. Specifically, Q/N residues, which are predicted to have a relatively low amyloid propensity in the context of hydrophobic amyloid domains (34), may promote amyloid formation when present at sufficiently high density. Stacking of Q/N residues to form polar zippers has been proposed to stabilize amyloid fibrils (35). Consistent with this hypothesis, mutational studies of Sup35 indicate that Q/N residues are critical for driving [PSI⁺] formation (12), and expanded poly-Q or poly-N tracts are sufficient to drive amyloid aggregation (36, 63). Therefore, this paper examines the sequence features that allow the polar, Q/N-rich yeast PFDs to form prions.Mutational studies of the PFDs of Ure2 and Sup35 have shown that amino acid composition is the predominant feature driving prion formation (40, 41). Due to the unique compositional biases observed in the yeast PFDs, algorithms have been developed to identify potential PFDs based solely on amino acid composition (19, 28, 42). These algorithms are designed to produce a list of potential prion proteins that meet a specific set of criteria (such as high Q/N content) but are not able to predict the prion propensity of each member of the list or to predict the effects of mutations on prion formation. A recent study by Alberti et al. was the first to systematically test whether compositional similarity to known PFDs is sufficient to distinguish between Q/N-rich proteins that form prions and those that do not. They developed a hidden Markov model to identify domains that are compositionally similar to known PFDs and then analyzed the 100 highest-scoring Q/N-rich domains in a series of in vivo and in vitro assays (1). Remarkably, they discovered 18 proteins with prion-like activity in all assays. However, an equal number, including some of the domains with greatest compositional similarity to known PFDs, showed no prion-like activity.This inability to distinguish between Q/N-rich proteins that form prions and those that do not might seem to suggest that amino acid composition is not an accurate predictor of prion propensity. However, an alternative explanation is that known yeast PFDs are not an ideal training set for a composition-based prediction algorithm, since yeast prions are likely not optimized for maximal prion propensity. It is unclear whether yeast prion formation is a beneficial phenomenon providing a mechanism to regulate protein activity or a detrimental phenomenon analogous to human amyloid disease. [PSI⁺] can increase resistance to certain stress conditions (56), but the failure to observe [PSI⁺] in wild yeast strains (29) argues that beneficial [PSI⁺] formation is at most a rare event. If yeast prions are diseases, the PFDs certainly would not be optimized for maximum prion potential. If prion formation is a beneficial event allowing for rapid conversion between active and inactive states, the prion potential of the PFD would be optimized such that the frequencies of prion formation and loss would yield the optimal balance of prion and nonprion cells (25). Thus, specific residues might be excluded from yeast PFDs either because they inhibit prion formation or because they too strongly promote prion formation; bioinformatic analysis can reveal which residues are excluded from yeast PFDs but not why they are excluded. Accurate prediction of prion propensity requires understanding which deviations from known prion-forming compositions will promote prion formation and which will inhibit.We have therefore developed the first in vivo method to quantitatively determine the prion propensity for each amino acid in the context of a Q/N-rich PFD. As expected, we found proline and charged residues to be strongly inhibitory to prion formation; but surprisingly, despite being largely underrepresented in yeast PFDs, hydrophobic residues strongly promoted prion formation. Furthermore, although Q/N residues dominate yeast PFDs, prion propensity appears relatively insensitive to the exact number of Q/N residues. Using these data, we were able to distinguish with approximately 90% accuracy between Q/N-rich domains that can form prion-like aggregates and those that cannot. These experiments provide the first detailed insight into the compositional requirements for yeast prion formation and illuminate the different methods by which Q/N- and non-Q/N-rich amyloidogenic proteins aggregate.     

Shedding light on prion disease

Several fatal, progressive neurodegenerative diseases, including various prion and prion-like disorders, are connected with the misfolding of specific proteins. These proteins misfold into toxic oligomeric species and a spectrum of distinct self-templating amyloid structures, termed strains. Hence, small molecules that prevent or reverse these protein-misfolding events might have therapeutic utility. Yet it is unclear whether a single small molecule can antagonize the complete repertoire of misfolded forms encompassing diverse amyloid polymorphs and soluble oligomers. We have begun to investigate this issue using the yeast prion protein, Sup35, as an experimental paradigm. We have discovered that a polyphenol, (-)epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), effectively inhibited the formation of infectious amyloid forms (prions) of Sup35 and even remodeled preassembled prions. Surprisingly, EGCG selectively modulated specific prion strains and even selected for EGCG-resistant prion strains with novel structural and biological characteristics. Thus, treatment with a single small molecule antagonist of amyloidogenesis can select for novel, drug-resistant amyloid polymorphs. Importantly, combining EGCG with another small molecule, 4,5-bis-(4-methoxyanilino)phthalimide, synergistically antagonized and remodeled a wide array of Sup35 prion strains without producing any drug-resistant prions. We suggest that minimal drug cocktails, small collections of drugs that collectively antagonize all amyloid polymorphs, should be identified to besiege various neurodegenerative disorders.     

Controlling the prion propensity of glutamine/asparagine-rich proteins

ABSTRACT

The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae can harbor a number of distinct prions. Most of the yeast prion proteins contain a glutamine/asparagine (Q/N) rich region that drives prion formation. Prion-like domains, defined as regions with high compositional similarity to yeast prion domains, are common in eukaryotic proteomes, and mutations in various human proteins containing prion-like domains have been linked to degenerative diseases, including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Here, we discuss a recent study in which we utilized two strategies to generate prion activity in non-prion Q/N-rich domains. First, we made targeted mutations in four non-prion Q/N-rich domains, replacing predicted prion-inhibiting amino acids with prion-promoting amino acids. All four mutants formed foci when expressed in yeast, and two acquired bona fide prion activity. Prion activity could be generated with as few as two mutations, suggesting that many non-prion Q/N-rich proteins may be just a small number of mutations from acquiring aggregation or prion activity. Second, we created tandem repeats of short prion-prone segments, and observed length-dependent prion activity. These studies demonstrate the considerable progress that has been made in understanding the sequence basis for aggregation of prion and prion-like domains, and suggest possible mechanisms by which new prion domains could evolve.     

Prions: Portable prion domains

Self-propagating abnormal proteins, prions, have been identified in yeast; asparagine/glutamine-rich 'prion domains' within these proteins can inactivate the linked functional domains; new prion domains and reporters have been used to make 'synthetic prions', leading to discoveries of new natural prions.     

The effects of amino acid composition on yeast prion formation and prion domain interactions

Yeast prions provide a powerful model system for examining prion formation and propagation in vivo. Yeast prion formation is driven primarily by amino acid composition, not by primary amino acid sequence. However, although yeast prion domains are consistently glutamine/asparagine-rich, they otherwise vary significantly in their compositions. Therefore, elucidating the exact compositional requirements for yeast prion formation has proven challenging. We have developed an in vivo method that allows for estimation of the prion propensity of each amino acid within the context of a yeast prion domain.1 Using these values, we are able to predict the prion-propensity of various glutamine/asparagine-rich yeast domains. These results provide insight into the basis for yeast prion formation, and may aid in the discovery of additional novel prion domains. Additionally, we examined whether amino acid composition could drive interactions between heterologous glutamine/asparagine-rich proteins.2 Although inefficient interactions between yeast prion domains have previously been observed, we found that one prion protein, Ure2, is able to interact with compositionally similar domains with unprecedented efficiency. This observation, combined with the growing number of yeast prions, suggests that a broad network of interactions between heterologous glutamine/asparagine-rich proteins may affect yeast prion formation.     

Scrambled prion domains form prions and amyloid

The [URE3] prion of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a self-propagating amyloid form of Ure2p. The amino-terminal prion domain of Ure2p is necessary and sufficient for prion formation and has a high glutamine (Q) and asparagine (N) content. Such Q/N-rich domains are found in two other yeast prion proteins, Sup35p and Rnq1p, although none of the many other yeast Q/N-rich domain proteins have yet been found to be prions. To examine the role of amino acid sequence composition in prion formation, we used Ure2p as a model system and generated five Ure2p variants in which the order of the amino acids in the prion domain was randomly shuffled while keeping the amino acid composition and C-terminal domain unchanged. Surprisingly, all five formed prions in vivo, with a range of frequencies and stabilities, and the prion domains of all five readily formed amyloid fibers in vitro. Although it is unclear whether other amyloid-forming proteins would be equally resistant to scrambling, this result demonstrates that [URE3] formation is driven primarily by amino acid composition, largely independent of primary sequence.     

In vitro analysis of SpUre2p, a prion-related protein, exemplifies the relationship between amyloid and prion

The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae contains in its proteome at least three prion proteins. These proteins (Ure2p, Sup35p, and Rnq1p) share a set of remarkable properties. In vivo, they form aggregates that self-perpetuate their aggregation. This aggregation is controlled by Hsp104, which plays a major role in the growth and severing of these prions. In vitro, these prion proteins form amyloid fibrils spontaneously. The introduction of such fibrils made from Ure2p or Sup35p into yeast cells leads to the prion phenotypes [URE3] and [PSI], respectively. Previous studies on evolutionary biology of yeast prions have clearly established that [URE3] is not well conserved in the hemiascomycetous yeasts and particularly in S. paradoxus. Here we demonstrated that the S. paradoxus Ure2p is able to form infectious amyloid. These fibrils are more resistant than S. cerevisiae Ure2p fibrils to shear force. The observation, in vivo, of a distinct aggregation pattern for GFP fusions confirms the higher propensity of SpUre2p to form fibrillar structures. Our in vitro and in vivo analysis of aggregation propensity of the S. paradoxus Ure2p provides an explanation for its loss of infective properties and suggests that this protein belongs to the non-prion amyloid world.     

Expanding the yeast prion world

Mammalian and fungal prion proteins form self-perpetuating β-sheet-rich fibrillar aggregates called amyloid. Prion inheritance is based on propagation of the regularly oriented amyloid structures of the prion proteins. All yeast prion proteins identified thus far contain aggregation-prone glutamine/asparagine (Gln/Asn)-rich domains, although the mammalian prion protein and fungal prion protein HET-s do not contain such sequences. In order to fill this gap, we searched for novel yeast prion proteins lacking Gln/Asn-rich domains via a genome-wide screen based on cross-seeding between two heterologous proteins and identified Mod5, a yeast tRNA isopentenyltransferase, as a novel non-Gln/Asn-rich yeast prion protein. Mod5 formed self-propagating amyloid fibers in vitro and the introduction of Mod5 amyloids into non-prion yeast induced dominantly and cytoplasmically heritable prion state [MOD⁺], which harbors aggregates of endogenous Mod5. [MOD⁺] yeast showed an increased level of membrane lipid ergosterol and acquired resistance to antifungal agents. Importantly, enhanced de novo formation of [MOD⁺] was observed when non-prion yeast was grown under selective pressures from antifungal drugs. Our findings expand the family of yeast prions to non-Gln/Asn-rich proteins and reveal the acquisition of a fitness advantage for cell survival through active prion conversion.     

Genetic and epigenetic control of the efficiency and fidelity of cross‐species prion transmission

Self‐perpetuating amyloid‐based protein isoforms (prions) transmit neurodegenerative diseases in mammals and phenotypic traits in yeast. Although mechanisms that control species specificity of prion transmission are poorly understood, studies of closely related orthologues of yeast prion protein Sup35 demonstrate that cross‐species prion transmission is modulated by both genetic (specific sequence elements) and epigenetic (prion variants, or ‘strains’) factors. Depending on the prion variant, the species barrier could be controlled at the level of either heterologous co‐aggregation or conversion of the aggregate‐associated heterologous protein into a prion polymer. Sequence divergence influences cross‐species transmission of different prion variants in opposing ways. The ability of a heterologous prion domain to either faithfully reproduce or irreversibly switch the variant‐specific prion patterns depends on both sequence divergence and the prion variant. Sequence variations within different modules of prion domains contribute to transmission barriers in different cross‐species combinations. Individual amino acid substitutions within short amyloidogenic stretches drastically alter patterns of cross‐species prion conversion, implicating these stretches as major determinants of species specificity.     

The [RNQ+] prion: A model of both functional and pathological amyloid

The formation of fibrillar amyloid is most often associated with protein conformational disorders such as prion diseases, Alzheimer disease and Huntington disease. Interestingly, however, an increasing number of studies suggest that amyloid structures can sometimes play a functional role in normal biology. Several proteins form self-propagating amyloids called prions in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. These unique elements operate by creating a reversible, epigenetic change in phenotype. While the function of the non-prion conformation of the Rnq1 protein is unclear, the prion form, [RNQ+], acts to facilitate the de novo formation of other prions to influence cellular phenotypes. The [RNQ+] prion itself does not adversely affect the growth of yeast, but the overexpression of Rnq1p can form toxic aggregated structures that are not necessarily prions. The [RNQ+] prion is also involved in dictating the aggregation and toxicity of polyglutamine proteins ectopically expressed in yeast. Thus, the [RNQ+] prion provides a tractable model that has the potential to reveal significant insight into the factors that dictate how amyloid structures are initiated and propagated in both physiological and pathological contexts.     

Analysis of yeast prion aggregates with amyloid-staining compound in vivo

Yeast prions are protein-based genetic elements whose non-Mendelian patterns of inheritance are explained by their inheritance of altered conformations. Here we showed that aggregates made by overexpression of two different prion domains of Sup35 and Rnq1, were stained in yeast by thioflavin-S, an amyloid binding compound. These results suggested that yeast prion domains take the form of amyloid in vivo, and supported the idea that the self-propagating property of amyloids is responsible for the heritable traits of yeast prions.     

The effects of glutamine/asparagine content on aggregation and heterologous prion induction by yeast prion-like domains

Prion-like domains are low complexity, intrinsically disordered domains that compositionally resemble yeast prion domains. Many prion-like domains are involved in the formation of either functional or pathogenic protein aggregates. These aggregates range from highly dynamic liquid droplets to highly ordered detergent-insoluble amyloid-like aggregates. To better understand the amino acid sequence features that promote conversion to stable, detergent-insoluble aggregates, we used the prediction algorithm PAPA to identify predicted aggregation-prone prion-like domains with a range of compositions. While almost all of the predicted aggregation-prone domains formed foci when expressed in cells, the ability to form the detergent-insoluble aggregates was highly correlated with glutamine/asparagine (Q/N) content, suggesting that high Q/N content may specifically promote conversion to the amyloid state in vivo. We then used this data set to examine cross-seeding between prion-like proteins. The prion protein Sup35 requires the presence of a second prion, [PIN⁺], to efficiently form prions, but this requirement can be circumvented by the expression of various Q/N-rich protein fragments. Interestingly, almost all of the Q/N-rich domains that formed SDS-insoluble aggregates were able to promote prion formation by Sup35, highlighting the highly promiscuous nature of these interactions.     

Insights into intragenic and extragenic effectors of prion propagation using chimeric prion proteins

The study of fungal prion proteins affords remarkable opportunities to elucidate both intragenic and extragenic effectors of prion propagation. The yeast prion protein Sup35 and the self-perpetuating [PSI+] prion state is one of the best characterized fungal prions. While there is little sequence homology among known prion proteins, one region of striking similarity exists between Sup35p and the mammalian prion protein PrP. This region is comprised of roughly five octapeptide repeats of similar composition. The expansion of the repeat region in PrP is associated with inherited prion diseases. In order to learn more about the effects of PrP repeat expansions on the structural properties of a protein that undergoes a similar transition to a self-perpetuating aggregate, we generated chimeric Sup35-PrP proteins. Using both in vivo and in vitro systems we described the effect of repeat length on protein misfolding, aggregation, amyloid formation, and amyloid stability. We found that repeat expansions in the chimeric prion proteins increase the propensity to initiate prion propagation and enhance the formation of amyloid fibers without significantly altering fiber stability.     

The [RNQ+] prion: A model of both functional and pathological amyloid

The formation of fibrillar amyloid is most often associated with protein conformational disorders such as prion diseases, Alzheimer disease and Huntington disease. Interestingly, however, an increasing number of studies suggest that amyloid structures can sometimes play a functional role in normal biology. Several proteins form self-propagating amyloids called prions in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. These unique elements operate by creating a reversible, epigenetic change in phenotype. While the function of the non-prion conformation of the Rnq1 protein is unclear, the prion form, [RNQ⁺], acts to facilitate the de novo formation of other prions to influence cellular phenotypes. The [RNQ⁺] prion itself does not adversely affect the growth of yeast, but the overexpression of Rnq1p can form toxic aggregated structures that are not necessarily prions. The [RNQ⁺] prion is also involved in dictating the aggregation and toxicity of polyglutamine proteins ectopically expressed in yeast. Thus, the [RNQ⁺] prion provides a tractable model that has the potential to reveal significant insight into the factors that dictate how amyloid structures are initiated and propagated in both physiological and pathological contexts.Key words: [RNQ⁺], [PSI⁺], prion, polyglutamine, functional amyloid, toxic amyloid, chaperones, epigenetic     

Relationship between prion propensity and the rates of individual molecular steps of fibril assembly

Peptides and proteins possess an inherent propensity to self-assemble into generic fibrillar nanostructures known as amyloid fibrils, some of which are involved in medical conditions such as Alzheimer disease. In certain cases, such structures can self-propagate in living systems as prions and transmit characteristic traits to the host organism. The mechanisms that allow certain amyloid species but not others to function as prions are not fully understood. Much progress in understanding the prion phenomenon has been achieved through the study of prions in yeast as this system has proved to be experimentally highly tractable; but quantitative understanding of the biophysics and kinetics of the assembly process has remained challenging. Here, we explore the assembly of two closely related homologues of the Ure2p protein from Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces paradoxus, and by using a combination of kinetic theory with solution and biosensor assays, we are able to compare the rates of the individual microscopic steps of prion fibril assembly. We find that for these proteins the fragmentation rate is encoded in the structure of the seed fibrils, whereas the elongation rate is principally determined by the nature of the soluble precursor protein. Our results further reveal that fibrils that elongate faster but fracture less frequently can lose their ability to propagate as prions. These findings illuminate the connections between the in vitro aggregation of proteins and the in vivo proliferation of prions, and provide a framework for the quantitative understanding of the parameters governing the behavior of amyloid fibrils in normal and aberrant biological pathways.     

A non-Q/N-rich prion domain of a foreign prion, [Het-s], can propagate as a prion in yeast

Prions are self-propagating, infectious aggregates of misfolded proteins. The mammalian prion, PrP(Sc), causes fatal neurodegenerative disorders. Fungi also have prions. While yeast prions depend upon glutamine/asparagine (Q/N)-rich regions, the Podospora anserina HET-s and PrP prion proteins lack such sequences. Nonetheless, we show that the HET-s prion domain fused to GFP propagates as a prion in yeast. Analogously to native yeast prions, transient overexpression of the HET-s fusion induces ring-like aggregates that propagate in daughter cells as cytoplasmically inherited, detergent-resistant dot aggregates. Efficient dot propagation, but not ring formation, is dependent upon the Hsp104 chaperone. The yeast prion [PIN(+)] enhances HET-s ring formation, suggesting that prions with and without Q/N-rich regions interact. Finally, HET-s aggregates propagated in yeast are infectious when introduced into Podospora. Taken together, these results demonstrate prion propagation in a truly foreign host. Since yeast can host non-Q/N-rich prions, such native yeast prions may exist.     

Prion domains: sequences, structures and interactions

Mammalian and most fungal infectious proteins (also known as prions) are self-propagating amyloid, a filamentous beta-sheet structure. A prion domain determines the infectious properties of a protein by forming the core of the amyloid. We compare the properties of known prion domains and their interactions with the remainder of the protein and with chaperones. Ure2p and Sup35p, two yeast prion proteins, can still form prions when the prion domains are shuffled, indicating a parallel in-register beta-sheet structure.     

Molecular basis for transmission barrier and interference between closely related prion proteins in yeast

Replicating amyloids, called prions, are responsible for transmissible neurodegenerative diseases in mammals and some heritable phenotypes in fungi. The transmission of prions between species is usually inhibited, being highly sensitive to small differences in amino acid sequence of the prion-forming proteins. To understand the molecular basis of this prion interspecies barrier, we studied the transmission of the [PSI(+)] prion state from Sup35 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to hybrid Sup35 proteins with prion-forming domains from four other closely related Saccharomyces species. Whereas all the hybrid Sup35 proteins could adopt a prion form in S. cerevisiae, they could not readily acquire the prion form from the [PSI(+)] prion of S. cerevisiae. Expression of the hybrid Sup35 proteins in S. cerevisiae [PSI(+)] cells often resulted in frequent loss of the native [PSI(+)] prion. Furthermore, all hybrid Sup35 proteins showed different patterns of interaction with the native [PSI(+)] prion in terms of co-polymerization, acquisition of the prion state, and induced prion loss, all of which were also dependent on the [PSI(+)] variant. The observed loss of S. cerevisiae [PSI(+)] can be related to inhibition of prion polymerization of S. cerevisiae Sup35 and formation of a non-heritable form of amyloid. We have therefore identified two distinct molecular origins of prion transmission barriers between closely sequence-related prion proteins: first, the inability of heterologous proteins to co-aggregate with host prion polymers, and second, acquisition by these proteins of a non-heritable amyloid fold.