共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Tessa Richards 《BMJ (Clinical research ed.)》1983,286(6362):378-379
8.
Richard Smith 《BMJ (Clinical research ed.)》1982,285(6346):959-960
9.
10.
Jonathan A. Patz Holly K. Gibbs Jonathan A. Foley Jamesine V. Rogers Kirk R. Smith 《EcoHealth》2007,4(4):397-405
Climate change, as an environmental hazard operating at the global scale, poses a unique and “involuntary exposure” to many
societies, and therefore represents possibly the largest health inequity of our time. According to statistics from the World
Health Organization (WHO), regions or populations already experiencing the most increase in diseases attributable to temperature
rise in the past 30 years ironically contain those populations least responsible for causing greenhouse gas warming of the
planet. Average global carbon emissions approximate one metric ton per year (tC/yr) per person. In 2004, United States per
capita emissions neared 6 tC/yr (with Canada and Australia not far behind), and Japan and Western European countries range
from 2 to 5 tC/yr per capita. Yet developing countries’ per capita emissions approximate 0.6 tC/yr, and more than 50 countries
are below 0.2 tC/yr (or 30-fold less than an average American). This imbalance between populations suffering from an increase
in climate-sensitive diseases versus those nations producing greenhouse gases that cause global warming can be quantified
using a “natural debt” index, which is the cumulative depleted CO2 emissions per capita. This is a better representation of the responsibility for current warming than a single year’s emissions.
By this measure, for example, the relative responsibilities of the U.S. in relation to those of India or China is nearly double
that using an index of current emissions, although it does not greatly change the relationship between India and China. Rich
countries like the U.S. have caused much more of today’s warming than poor ones, which have not been emitting at significant
levels for many years yet, no matter what current emissions indicate. Along with taking necessary measures to reduce the extent
of global warming and the associated impacts, society also needs to pursue equitable solutions that first protect the most
vulnerable population groups; be they defined by demographics, income, or location. For example, according to the WHO, 88%
of the disease burden attributable to climate change afflicts children under age 5 (obviously an innocent and “nonconsenting”
segment of the population), presenting another major axis of inequity. Not only is the health burden from climate change itself
greatest among the world’s poor, but some of the major mitigation approaches to reduce the degree of warming may produce negative
side effects disproportionately among the poor, for example, competition for land from biofuels creating pressure on food
prices. Of course, in today’s globalized world, eventually all nations will share some risk, but underserved populations will
suffer first and most strongly from climate change. Moreover, growing recognition that society faces a nonlinear and potentially
irreversible threat has deep ethical implications about humanity’s stewardship of the planet that affect both rich and poor. 相似文献
11.
12.
13.
Second International Conference on Transgenic Animals, Beijing, China, October 23–26, 1998. Organized by the Bilong Institute for Transgenic Animals and the China International Conference Center for Sciences and Technology 相似文献
14.
15.
Tony Delamothe 《BMJ (Clinical research ed.)》1988,296(6638):1728-1729
16.
17.
Richard Smith 《BMJ (Clinical research ed.)》1984,289(6437):101-102
18.
19.
20.
Tessa Richards 《BMJ (Clinical research ed.)》1983,287(6385):120