Antiproliferative effects of selective adenosine receptor agonists and antagonists on human lymphocytes: evidence for receptor-independent mechanisms

The effects of standard adenosine receptor (AR) agonists and antagonists on the proliferation of human T lymphocytes, unstimulated and phytohemagglutinin-stimulated human peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL), and Jurkat T cells were investigated. Real-time PCR measurements confirmed the presence of all four AR subtypes on the investigated cells, although at different expression levels. A_2A ARs were predominantly expressed in PBL and further upregulated upon stimulation, while malignant Jurkat T cells showed high expression levels of A₁, A_2A, and A_2B ARs. Cell proliferation was measured by [³H]-thymidine incorporation assays. Several ligands, including the subtype-selective agonists CPA (A₁), BAY60-6583 (A_2B), and IB-MECA (A₃), and the antagonists PSB-36 (A₁), MSX-2 (A_2A), and PSB-10 (A₃) significantly inhibited cell proliferation at micromolar concentrations, which were about three orders of magnitude higher than their AR affinities. In contrast, further investigated AR ligands, including the agonists NECA (nonselective) and CGS21680 (A_2A), and the antagonists preladenant (SCH-420814, A_2A), PSB-1115 (A_2B), and PSB-603 (A_2B) showed no or only minor effects on lymphocyte proliferation. The anti-proliferative effects of the AR agonists could not be blocked by the corresponding antagonists. The non-selective AR antagonist caffeine stimulated phytohemagglutinin-activated PBL with an EC₅₀ value of 104 μM. This is the first study to compare a complete set of commonly used AR ligands for all subtypes on lymphocyte proliferation. Our results strongly suggest that these compounds induce an inhibition of lymphocyte proliferation and cell death through AR-independent mechanisms.     

Common actions of adenosine receptor agonists in modulating human trabecular meshwork cell transport

A₁ adenosine receptors (ARs) reduce, and A₂ARs increase intraocular pressure, partly by differentially altering resistance to aqueous humor outflow. It is unknown whether the opposing effects of A₁AR and A₂AR agonists are mediated at different outflow-pathway cell targets or by opposing actions on a single cell target. We tested whether a major outflow-pathway cell, the trabecular meshwork (TM) cell might constitute the primary AR-agonist target and respond differentially to A₁, A_2A and A₃AR agonists. Receptor activation in human TM cells was identified by applying subtype-selective AR agonists: CPA and ADAC for A₁ARs, CGS 21680 and DPMA for A_2AARs, and Cl-IB-MECA and IB-MECA for A₃ARs. Stimulation of A₁, A_2A and A₃ARs elevated Ca²⁺, measured with fura-2. Whole-cell patch clamping indicated that AR agonists activated ion channels non-uniformly, possibly reflecting variability in magnitude of agonist-triggered second-messenger responses. A₁, A_2A and A₃AR agonists all reduced volume, determined by calcein cell imaging. The endogenous source of adenosine delivery to the outflow pathway could be the TM cells since these cells were stimulated to release ATP by hypotonic perfusion. We conclude that: (1) TM cells express functional A₁, A_2A and A₃ARs; and (2) the reported differential effects of AR agonists on aqueous humor outflow are not mediated by differential actions on TM-cell Ca²⁺ and volume, but likely by actions on separate cell targets. Reprint requests should be addressed to: Dr. Mortimer M. Civan, Dept. of Physiology, University of Pennsylvania, Richards Building, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6085. [Tel.: (215)-898-8773; Fax: (215)-573-5851]     

Adenosine A(2A) receptor activation limits chronic granulomatous disease-induced hyperinflammation

Chronic granulomatous disease (CGD) is caused by defects in the NADPH oxidase complex and is characterized by an increased susceptibility to infection. Other significant complications of CGD include autoimmunity and non-infectious hyperinflammatory disorders. We show that a gp91^phox deficiency leads to the development of phenotypically altered T lymphocytes in mice and that this abnormal, hyperactive phenotype can be modulated by activation of the adenosine A_2A receptor. T cells isolated from CGD mice produce significantly higher levels of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IFN-γ, IL-2, TNF-α, IL-4 and IL-13 than do WT cells after TCR-mediated activation; treatment with the selective adenosine A_2A receptor agonist, CGS21680, potently inhibits this response. Additionally, the over exuberant inflammatory response elicited by thioglycollate challenge in gp91^phox deficient mice is attenuated by CGS21680. These data suggest that treatment with A_2AR agonists may be an effective therapy by which to regulate the immune system hyperactivity that results from a gp91^phox deficiency.     

Selectivity is species-dependent: Characterization of standard agonists and antagonists at human,rat, and mouse adenosine receptors

Adenosine receptors (ARs) have emerged as new drug targets. The majority of data on affinity/potency and selectivity of AR ligands described in the literature has been obtained for the human species. However, preclinical studies are mostly performed in mouse or rat, and standard AR agonists and antagonists are frequently used for studies in rodents without knowing their selectivity in the investigated species. In the present study, we selected a set of frequently used standard AR ligands, 8 agonists and 16 antagonists, and investigated them in radioligand binding studies at all four AR subtypes, A₁, A_2A, A_2B, and A₃, of three species, human, rat, and mouse. Recommended, selective agonists include CCPA (for A₁AR of rat and mouse), CGS-21680 (for A_2A AR of rat), and Cl-IB-MECA (for A₃AR of all three species). The functionally selective partial A_2B agonist BAY60-6583 was found to additionally bind to A₁ and A₃AR and act as an antagonist at both receptor subtypes. The antagonists PSB-36 (A₁), preladenant (A_2A), and PSB-603 (A_2B) displayed high selectivity in all three investigated species. MRS-1523 acts as a selective A₃AR antagonist in human and rat, but is only moderately selective in mouse. The comprehensive data presented herein provide a solid basis for selecting suitable AR ligands for biological studies.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11302-015-9460-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.     

Molecular modeling of a PAMAM-CGS21680 dendrimer bound to an A2A adenosine receptor homodimer

The theoretical possibility of bivalent binding of a dendrimer, covalently appended with multiple copies of a small ligand, to a homodimer of a G protein-coupled receptor was investigated with a molecular modeling approach. A molecular model was constructed of a third generation (G3) poly(amidoamine) (PAMAM) dendrimer condensed with multiple copies of the potent A_2A adenosine receptor agonist CGS21680. The dendrimer was bound to an A_2A adenosine receptor homodimer. Two units of the nucleoside CGS21680 could occupy the A_2A receptor homodimer simultaneously. The binding mode of CGS21680 moieties linked to the PAMAM dendrimer and docked to the A_2A receptor was found to be similar to the binding mode of a monomeric CGS21680 ligand.     

Regulation of adenosine receptors expression in rat B lymphocytes by insulin

Development of diabetes is associated with altered expression of adenosine receptors (ARs). Some of these alterations might be attributed to changes in insulin concentration. This study was undertaken to investigate the possible insulin effect on ARs level, and to determine the signaling pathway utilized by insulin to regulate the expression of ARs in rat B lymphocytes. Western blot analysis of B lymphocytes protein extracts indicated that all four ARs were present at detectable levels in the cells cultured for 24 h without insulin (≤10^?11 M), although the protein band of A_2A‐AR was barely visible. Inclusion of insulin (10^?8 M) in the culture medium resulted in an increase of A₁‐AR and A_2A‐AR protein levels and a significant decrease of A_2B‐AR protein, whereas the protein level of A₃‐AR remained unchanged. Alterations in the ARs protein content were accompanied by changes in the ARs mRNA levels. Increase of the insulin concentration from 10^?11 to 10^?8 M resulted in 50% decrease of A_2B‐AR mRNA level and two‐, and threefold increase of A₁‐AR and A_2A‐AR mRNA levels, respectively. Pretreatment of B cells with cycloheximide completely blocked the insulin action on A₁‐AR and A_2A‐AR mRNA, but not on A_2B‐AR expression. Detailed pharmacological analysis demonstrated that insulin‐induced A₁‐AR and A_2A‐AR mRNA expression through the Ras/Raf‐1/MEK/ERK pathway. The insulin effect on A_2B‐AR expression was blocked by p38 MAP kinase inhibitor (SB 203580). Concluding, elevated insulin concentration differentially affects the expression of ARs in B lymphocytes in a fashion that might enhance the various immunomodulatory effects of adenosine. J. Cell. Biochem. 109: 396–405, 2010. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Role of extracellular cysteine residues in the adenosine A<Subscript>2A</Subscript> receptor

The G protein-coupled A_2A adenosine receptor represents an important drug target. Crystal structures and modeling studies indicated that three disulfide bonds are formed between ECL1 and ECL2 (I, Cys71^2.69-Cys159^45.43; II, Cys74^3.22-Cys146^45.30, and III, Cys77^3.25-Cys166^45.50). However, the A_2BAR subtype appears to require only disulfide bond III for proper function. In this study, each of the three disulfide bonds in the A_2AAR was disrupted by mutation of one of the cysteine residues to serine. The mutant receptors were stably expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells and analyzed in cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) accumulation and radioligand binding studies using structurally diverse agonists: adenosine, NECA, CGS21680, and PSB-15826. Results were rationalized by molecular modeling. The observed effects were dependent on the investigated agonist. Loss of disulfide bond I led to a widening of the orthosteric binding pocket resulting in a strong reduction in the potency of adenosine, but not of NECA or 2-substituted nucleosides. Disruption of disulfide bond II led to a significant reduction in the agonists’ efficacy indicating its importance for receptor activation. Disulfide bond III disruption reduced potency and affinity of the small adenosine agonists and NECA, but not of the larger 2-substituted agonists. While all the three disulfide bonds were essential for high potency or efficacy of adenosine, structural modification of the nucleoside could rescue affinity or efficacy at the mutant receptors. At present, it cannot be excluded that formation of the extracellular disulfide bonds in the A_2AAR is dynamic. This might add another level of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) modulation, in particular for the cysteine-rich A_2A and A_2BARs.     

A2A adenosine receptor activation prevents neutrophil aging and promotes polarization from N1 towards N2 phenotype

Extracellular adenosine is a biologically active signaling molecule that accumulates at sites of metabolic stress in sepsis. Extracellular adenosine has potent immunosuppressive effects by binding to and activating G protein-coupled A_2A adenosine receptors (A_2AARs) on the surface of neutrophils. A_2AAR signaling reproduces many of the phenotypic changes in neutrophils that are characteristic of sepsis, including decreased degranulation, impaired chemotaxis, and diminished ability to ingest and kill bacteria. We hypothesized that A_2AARs also suppress neutrophil aging, which precedes cell death, and N1 to N2 polarization. Using human neutrophils isolated from healthy subjects, we demonstrate that A_2AAR stimulation slows neutrophil aging, suppresses cell death, and promotes the polarization of neutrophils from an N1 to N2 phenotype. Using genetic knockout and pharmacological blockade, we confirmed that A_2AARs decrease neutrophil aging in murine sepsis induced by cecal ligation and puncture. A_2AARs expression is increased in neutrophils from septic patients compared to healthy subject but A_2AAR expression fails to correlate with aging or N1/N2 polarization. Our data reveals that A_2AARs regulate neutrophil aging in healthy but not septic neutrophils.

     

Characterization of adenosine receptors in Mullus surmuletus

The intent of the present study was to investigate adenosine receptor sites in brain membranes of the saltwater teleost fish, Mullus surmuletus, using the A₁ receptor selective agonist, [³H]CHA, and A_2a receptor selective agonist [³H]CGS 21680. The A₁ selective agonist, [³H]CHA, bound saturably, reversibly and with high affinity to a single-class of binding sites (K_d 1.47 nM; B_max 100–190 fmol/mg protein, dependent on fish length). The A_2a selective agonist, [³H]CGS 21680, also bound saturably, reversibly and with relative high affinity to a single-class of binding sites (K_d 44.2 nM; B_max 150–300 fmol/mg protein dependent on fish length). In equilibrium competition experiments, adenosine analogous, NECA, CGS 21680, CHA, CPA, S-PIA, R-PIA, CPCA, DPMA, and xanthine antagonists, DPCPX, XAC, and THEO all displaced [³H]CHA and [³H]CGS 21680 specifically bound to brain membranes from Mullus surmuletus. Specific binding of both [³H]CHA and [³H]CGS 21680 was inhibited by GDPβS. For [³H]CHA the IC₅₀ value was 2.5 ± 0.1 μM, while for [³H]CGS 21680 the IC₅₀ value was 7.7 ± 0.3 μM. Our results indicate that the high affinity binding sites for [³H]CHA have some pharmacological characteristics of mammalian A₁ adenosine receptors, while the binding sites for [³H]CGS 21680 appear to be virtually identical to the binding sites for [³H]CHA.     

Characterization of a low affinity binding site for N6-substituted adenosine derivatives in rat testis membranes

Abstract

The binding characteristics of radiolabeled N⁶-(cyclohexyl)adenosine ([³H]CHA), N⁶-(R-phenylisopropyl)adenosine ([³H]R-PIA), 5′-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine ([³H]NECA), and 2-[4-(2-carboxyethyl)phenyl]ethyl-amino-5′-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine ([³H]CGS 21680), to rat testis membranes were investigated. Specific binding of [³H]CGS 21680, a selective agonist for the A_2a adenosine receptor, was very modest whilst the nonselective agonist [³H]NECA bound to rat testis membranes showing high binding capacity. At least two types of binding sites for [³H]NECA could be identified in rat testis membranes: high affinity sites and high capacity sites. Selective agonists for the At adenosine receptor, [³H]CHA and [³H]R-PIA bound with high affinity to a single class of binding sites. This high affinity binding site showed the typical pharmacological specificity of the A₁ adenosine receptor with a potency order for agonists of CHA R-PIA > NECA > N⁶-(S-phenylisopropyl)adenosine (S-PIA). In order to detect the presence of the A₃ adenosine receptor in these membranes we selectively blocked the A₁ receptor with a large molar excess of a xanthine antagonist, either 1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine (DPCPX) or xanthine amine congener (XAC). In the presence of an antagonist a low affinity binding site for [³H]CHA and [³H]R-PIA was detected. This low affinity binding site showed a different pharmacological specificity than the high affinity binding site. In fact the potency order for agonists was CHA NECA = R-PIA > S-PIA. This finding suggests that the low affinity binding site represents the A₃ adenosine receptor.     

A2B adenosine receptor blockade inhibits growth of prostate cancer cells

The role of the A_2B adenosine receptor (AR) in prostate cell death and growth was studied. The A_2B AR gene expression quantified by real-time quantitative RT-PCR and Western blot analysis was the highest among four AR subtypes (A₁, A_2A, A_2B, and A₃) in all three commonly used prostate cancer cell lines, PC-3, DU145, and LNCaP. We explored the function of the A_2B AR using PC-3 cells as a model. The A_2B AR was visualized in PC-3 cells by laser confocal microscopy. The nonselective A_2B AR agonist NECA and the selective A_2B AR agonist BAY60-6583, but not the A_2A AR agonist CGS21680, concentration-dependently induced adenosine 3′,5′-cyclic monophosphate (cyclic AMP) accumulation. NECA diminished lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release, TNF-α-induced increase of caspase-3 activity, and cycloheximide (CHX)-induced morphological changes typical of apoptosis in PC-3 cells, which were blocked by a selective A_2B AR antagonist PSB603. NECA-induced proliferation of PC-3 cells was diminished by siRNA specific for the A_2B AR. The selective A_2B AR antagonist PSB603 was shown to inhibit cell growth in all three cell lines. Thus, A_2B AR blockade inhibits growth of prostate cancer cells, suggesting selective A_2B AR antagonists as potential novel therapeutics.     

The role of activated adenosine receptors in degranulation of human LAD2 mast cells

Mast cell degranulation triggers hypersensitivity reactions at the body–environment interface. Adenosine modulates degranulation, but enhancement and inhibition have both been reported. Which of four adenosine receptors (ARs) mediate modulation, and how, remains uncertain. Also uncertain is whether adenosine reaches mast cell ARs by autocrine ATP release and ecto-enzymatic conversion. Uncertainties partly reflect species and cell heterogeneity, circumvented here by focusing on homogeneous human LAD2 cells. Quantitative PCR detected expression of A_2A, A_2B, and A₃, but not A₁, ARs. Nonselective activation of ARs with increasing NECA monotonically enhanced immunologically or C3a-stimulated degranulation. NECA alone stimulated degranulation slightly. Selective AR antagonists did not affect C3a-stimulated degranulation. NECA''s enhancement of C3a-triggered degranulation was partially inhibited by separate application of each selective antagonist, and abolished by simultaneous addition of antagonists to the three ARs. Only the A_2A antagonist separately inhibited NECA''s enhancement of immunologically stimulated degranulation, which was abolished by simultaneous addition of the three selective antagonists. Immunological or C3a activation did not stimulate ATP release. NECA also enhanced immunologically triggered degranulation of mouse bone marrow derived mast cells (BMMCs), which was partially reduced only by simultaneous addition of the three antagonists or by the nonselective antagonist {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"CGS15943","term_id":"875345334"}}CGS15943. BMMCs also expressed A_2A, A_2B, and A₃ ARs. but not A₁AR detectably. We conclude that (a) A₁AR is unnecessary for LAD2 degranulation or AR enhancement; (b) A_2A, A_2B, and A₃ ARs all contribute to pharmacologic AR enhancement of LAD2 and BMMC degranulation; and (c) LAD2 cells depend on microenvironmental adenosine to trigger AR modulation.     

Cross-talk from β-Adrenergic Receptors Modulates α2A-Adrenergic Receptor Endocytosis in Sympathetic Neurons via Protein Kinase A and Spinophilin

Inter-regulation of adrenergic receptors (ARs) via cross-talk is a long appreciated but mechanistically unclear physiological phenomenon. Evidence from the AR literature and our own extensive studies on regulation of α_2AARs by the scaffolding protein spinophilin have illuminated a potential novel mechanism for cross-talk from β to α₂ARs. In the present study, we have characterized a mode of endogenous AR cross-talk in native adrenergic neurons whereby canonical βAR-mediated signaling modulates spinophilin-regulated α_2AAR endocytosis through PKA. Our findings demonstrate that co-activation of β and α_2AARs, either by application of endogenous agonist or by simultaneous stimulation with distinct selective agonists, results in acceleration of endogenous α_2AAR endocytosis in native neurons. We show that receptor-independent PKA activation by forskolin is sufficient to accelerate α_2AAR endocytosis and that α_2AAR stimulation alone drives accelerated endocytosis in spinophilin-null neurons. Endocytic response acceleration by β/α_2AAR co-activation is blocked by PKA inhibition and lost in spinophilin-null neurons, consistent with our previous finding that spinophilin is a substrate for phosphorylation by PKA that disrupts its interaction with α_2AARs. Importantly, we show that α₂AR agonist-mediated α_2AAR/spinophilin interaction is blocked by βAR co-activation in a PKA-dependent fashion. We therefore propose a novel mechanism for cross-talk from β to α₂ARs, whereby canonical βAR-mediated signaling coupled to PKA activation results in phosphorylation of spinophilin, disrupting its interaction with α_2AARs and accelerating α_2AAR endocytic responses. This mechanism of cross-talk has significant implications for endogenous adrenergic physiology and for therapeutic targeting of β and α_2AARs.     

Tritium-labeled agonists as tools for studying adenosine A<Subscript>2B</Subscript> receptors

A selective agonist radioligand for A_2B adenosine receptors (A_2BARs) is currently not available. Such a tool would be useful for labeling the active conformation of the receptors. Therefore, we prepared BAY 60-6583, a potent and functionally selective A_2BAR (partial) agonist, in a tritium-labeled form. Despite extensive efforts, however, we have not been able to establish a radioligand binding assay using [³H]BAY 60-6583. This is probably due to its high non-specific binding and its moderate affinity, which had previously been overestimated based on functional data. As an alternative, we evaluated the non-selective A_2BAR agonist [³H]NECA for its potential to label A_2BARs. [³H]NECA showed specific, saturable, and reversible binding to membrane preparations of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) or human embryonic kidney (HEK) cells stably expressing human, rat, or mouse A_2BARs. In competition binding experiments, the AR agonists 2-chloroadenosine (CADO) and NECA displayed significantly higher affinity when tested versus [³H]NECA than versus the A_2B-antagonist radioligand [³H]PSB-603 while structurally diverse AR antagonists showed the opposite effects. Although BAY 60-6583 is an A_2BAR agonist, it displayed higher affinity versus [³H]PSB-603 than versus [³H]NECA. These results indicate that nucleoside and non-nucleoside agonists are binding to very different conformations of the A_2BAR. In conclusion, [³H]NECA is currently the only useful radioligand for determining the affinity of ligands for an active A_2BAR conformation.     

Adenosine A2A receptor activation is determinant for BDNF actions upon GABA and glutamate release from rat hippocampal synaptosomes

Adenosine, through A_2A receptor (A_2AR) activation, can act as a metamodulator, controlling the actions of other modulators, as brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). Most of the metamodulatory actions of adenosine in the hippocampus have been evaluated in excitatory synapses. However, adenosine and BDNF can also influence GABAergic transmission. We thus evaluated the role of A_2AR on the modulatory effect of BDNF upon glutamate and GABA release from isolated hippocampal nerve terminals (synaptosomes). BDNF (30 ng/ml) enhanced K⁺-evoked [³H]glutamate release and inhibited the K⁺-evoked [³H]GABA release from synaptosomes. The effect of BDNF on both glutamate and GABA release requires tonic activation of adenosine A_2AR since for both neurotransmitters, the BDNF action was blocked by the A_2AR antagonist SCH 58261 (50 nM). In the presence of the A_2AR agonist, {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"CGS21680","term_id":"878113053","term_text":"CGS21680"}}CGS21680 (30 nM), the effect of BDNF on either glutamate or GABA release was, however, not potentiated. It is concluded that both the inhibitory actions of BDNF on GABA release as well as the facilitatory action of the neurotrophin on glutamate release are dependent on the activation of adenosine A_2AR by endogenous adenosine. However, these actions could not be further enhanced by exogenous activation of A_2AR.     

Adenosine receptor agonists affect taurine release from mouse brain stem slices in ischemia

The release of the inhibitory amino acid taurine is markedly enhanced under ischemic conditions in both adult and developing brain stem, together with a pronounced increase in the release of the neuromodulator adenosine. We now studied the effects of adenosine receptor agonists and antagonists on [³H]taurine release in the brain stem in normoxia and ischemia, using a superfusion system. Under standard conditions, the adenosine A₁ receptor agonist N⁶-cyclohexyladenosine (CHA) potentiated basal taurine release in adult mice, which response was blocked by the antagonist 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX). CHA and the A_2a receptor agonist 2-p-(2-carboxyethyl)phenylamino-5′-N-ethylcarboxaminoadenosinehydrochloride (CGS 21680) had no effect on the release in developing mice. In ischemia, CHA depressed both basal and K⁺-stimulated taurine release in developing mice in a receptor-mediated manner, blocked by DPCPX. The A_2a receptor agonist CGS 21680 was also inhibitory. Taurine and adenosine may thus not cooperate in developing mice to prevent ischemic neuronal damage. On the other hand, CGS 21680 enhanced taurine release in the adult brain stem in ischemia, both basal and K⁺-stimulated release being affected. These effects were abolished by the antagonist 3,7-dimethyl-1-propargylxanthine (DMPX), indicating a receptor-mediated process. In this case elevated levels of taurine could be beneficial, protecting against hyperexcitation and excitotoxicity.     

The PI3K–NF-κB signal transduction pathway is involved in mediating the anti-inflammatory effect of IB-MECA in adjuvant-induced arthritis

The anti-inflammatory effect of adenosine was previously found to be mediated via activation of the A₃ adenosine receptor (A₃AR). The aim of the present study was to decipher the molecular mechanism involved with the inhibitory effect of IB-MECA, an A₃AR agonist, on adjuvant-induced arthritis.     

Antagonist binding and induced conformational dynamics of GPCR A2A adenosine receptor

The A_2A adenosine receptor (A_2AAR) is a unique G‐protein coupled receptor (GPCR), because besides agonist, its antagonist could also lead to therapeutic relevance. Based on A_2AAR‐antagonist crystal structure, we have studied the binding mechanism of two distinct antagonists, ZM241385 and KW6002, and dynamic behaviors of A_2AAR induced by antagonist binding. Key residues interacting with both antagonists and residues specifically binding to one of them are identified. ZM241385 specifically bound to S67^2.65, M177^5.38, and N253^6.55, while KW6002 binds to F62^2.60, A81^3.29, and H264^7.29. Moreover, interactions with L167^5.28 are found for both antagonists, which were not reported in agonist binding. The dynamic behaviors of antagonist bound holo‐A_2AARs were found to be different from the apo‐A_2AAR in three typical functional switches, (i) the “ionic lock” was in equilibrium between formation and breakage in apo‐A_2AAR, but stayed broken in holo‐A_2AARs; (ii) the “rotamer toggle switch,” T88^3.36/F242^6.44/W246^6.48, adopted different rotameric conformations in apo‐A_2AAR and holo‐A_2AARs; (iii) apo‐A_2AAR preferred α‐helical intracellular loop (IC)2 and flexible IC3, while holo‐A_2AARs had a flexible IC2 and α‐helical IC3. Our results indicated that antagonist binding induced different conformational rearrangements of these characteristic functional switches in apo‐A_2AAR and holo‐A_2AARs. Proteins 2013; 81:1399–1410. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Adenosine A<Subscript>2A</Subscript> agonist and A<Subscript>2B</Subscript> antagonist mediate an inhibition of inflammation-induced contractile disturbance of a rat gastrointestinal preparation

Adenosine can show anti-inflammatory as well as pro-inflammatory activities. The contribution of the specific adenosine receptor subtypes in various cells, tissues and organs is complex. In this study, we examined the effect of the adenosine A_2A receptor agonist CGS 21680 and the A_2BR antagonist PSB-1115 on acute inflammation induced experimentally by 2,4,6-trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid (TNBS) on rat ileum/jejunum preparations. Pre-incubation of the ileum/jejunum segments with TNBS for 30 min resulted in a concentration-dependent inhibition of acetylcholine (ACh)-induced contractions. Pharmacological activation of the A_2AR with CGS 21680 (0.1–10 μM) pre-incubated simultaneously with TNBS (10 mM) prevented concentration-dependently the TNBS-induced inhibition of the ACh contractions. Stimulation of A_2BR with the selective agonist BAY 60-6583 (10 μM) did neither result in an increase nor in a further decrease of ACh-induced contractions compared to the TNBS-induced inhibition. The simultaneous pre-incubation of the ileum/jejunum segments with TNBS (10 mM) and the selective A_2BR antagonist PSB-1115 (100 μM) inhibited the contraction-decreasing effect of TNBS. The effects of the A_2AR agonist and the A_2BR antagonist were in the same range as the effect induced by 1 μM methotrexate. The combination of the A_2AR agonist CGS 21680 and the A_2BR antagonist PSB-1115 at subthreshold concentrations of both agents found a significant amelioration of the TNBS-diminished contractility. Our results demonstrate that the activation of A_2A receptors or the blockade of the A_2B receptors can prevent the inflammation-induced disturbance of the ACh-induced contraction in TNBS pre-treated small intestinal preparations. The combination of both may be useful for the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases.     

Expression of A1 adenosine receptors in the developing avian retina: in vivo modulation by A2A receptors and endogenous adenosine

Little is known about the mechanisms that regulate the expression of adenosine receptors during CNS development. We demonstrate here that retinas from chick embryos injected in ovo with selective adenosine receptor ligands show changes in A1 receptor expression after 48 h. Exposure to A1 agonist N⁶‐cyclohexyladenosine (CHA) or antagonist 8‐Cyclopentyl‐1, 3‐dipropylxanthine (DPCPX) reduced or increased, respectively, A1 receptor protein and [³H]DPCPX binding, but together, CHA+DPCPX had no effect. Interestingly, treatment with A_2A agonist 3‐[4‐[2‐[[6‐amino‐9‐[(2R,3R,4S,5S)‐5‐(ethylcarbamoyl)‐3,4‐dihydroxy‐oxolan‐2‐yl]purin‐2‐yl]amino] ethyl]phenyl] propanoic acid (CGS21680) increased A1 receptor protein and [³H]DPCPX binding, and reduced A_2A receptors. The A_2A antagonists 7‐(2‐phenylethyl)‐5‐amino‐2‐(2‐furyl)‐pyrazolo‐[4,3‐e]‐1,2,4‐trizolo[1,5‐c] pyrimidine (SCH58261) and 4‐(2‐[7‐amino‐2‐[2‐furyl][1,2,4]triazolo[2,3‐a][1,3,5]triazo‐5‐yl‐amino]ethyl)phenol (ZM241385) had opposite effects on A1 receptor expression. Exposure to CGS21680 + CHA did not change A1 receptor levels, whereas CHA + ZM241385 or CGS21680 + DPCPX had no synergic effect. The blockade of adenosine transporter with S‐(4‐nitrobenzyl)‐6‐thioinosine (NBMPR) also reduced [³H]DPCPX binding, an effect blocked by DPCPX, but not enhanced by ZM241385. [³H]DPCPX binding kinetics showed that treatment with CHA reduced and CGS21680 increased the Bmax, but did not affect Kd values. CHA, DPCPX, CGS21680, and ZM241385 had no effect on A1 receptor mRNA. These data demonstrated an in vivo regulation of A1 receptor expression by endogenous adenosine or long‐term treatment with A1 and A_2A receptors modulators.