What was the evolutionary synthesis?

There has not been another scientific revolution that caused as much turmoil and dissension as the darwinian one. For almost 80 years it was again and again pronounced to be a failure and to be totally refuted, and at least three major alternatives were proposed to replace it. Yet, in the 1930s-1940s the opposing views were quickly and decisively refuted and a largely unified evolutionary theory emerged. Why and how this happened, however, is still rather controversial.     

What limits the Serengeti zebra population?

The populations of the ecologically dominant ungulates in the Serengeti ecosystem (zebra, wildebeest and buffalo) have shown markedly different trends since the 1960s: the two ruminants both irrupted after the elimination of rinderpest in 1960, while the zebras have remained stable. The ruminants are resource limited (though parts of the buffalo population have been limited by poaching since the 1980s). The zebras resource acquisition tactics should allow them to outcompete the ruminants, but their greater spatial dispersion makes them more available to predators, and it has been suggested that this population is limited by predation. To investigate the mechanisms involved in the population dynamics of Serengeti zebra, we compared population dynamics among the three species using demographic models based on age-class-specific survival and fecundity. The only major difference between zebra and the two ruminants occurred in the first-year survival. We show that wildebeest have a higher reproductive potential than zebra (younger age at first breeding and shorter generation time). Nevertheless, these differences in reproduction cannot account for the observed differences in the population trends between the zebra and the ruminants. On the other hand, among-species differences in first-year survival are great enough to account for the constancy of zebra population size. We conclude that the very low first-year survival of zebra limits this population. We provide new data on predation in the Serengeti and show that, as in other ecosystems, predation rates on zebras are high, so predation could hold the population in a predator pit. However, lion and hyena feed principally on adult zebras, and further work is required to discover the process involved in the high mortality of foals.     

What limits the velocity of fast-skeletal muscle contraction in mammals?

In rat skeletal muscle the unloaded shortening velocity (Vo) is defined by the myosin isoform expressed in the muscle fibre. In 2001 we suggested that ADP release from actomyosin in solution (controlled by k(-AD)) was of the right size to limit Vo. However, to compare mechanical and solution kinetic data required a series of corrections to compensate for the differences in experimental conditions (0.5 M KCl, 22 degrees C for kinetic assays of myosin, 200 mM ionic strength, 12 degrees C to measure Vo). Here, a method was developed to prepare heavy meromyosin (HMM) from pure myosin isoforms isolated from single muscle fibres and to study k(-AD) (determined from the affinity of the acto-myosin complex for ADP, KAD) and the rate of ATP-induced acto-HMM dissociation (controlled by K1k+2) under the same experimental condition used to measure Vo). In fast-muscle myosin isolated from a wide range of mammalian muscles, k(-AD) was found to be too fast to limit Vo, whereas K1k+2 was of the right magnitude for ATP-induced dissociation of the cross-bridge to limit shortening velocity. The result was unexpected and prompted further experiments using the stopped-flow approach on myosin subfragment-1 (S1) and HMM obtained from bulk preparations of rabbit and rat muscle. These confirmed that the rate of cross-bridge dissociation by ATP limits the velocity of contraction for fast myosin II isoforms at 12 degrees C, while k(-AD) limits the velocity of slow myosin II isoforms. Extrapolating our data to 37 degrees C suggests that at physiological temperature the rate of ADP dissociation may limit Vo for both isoforms.     

What limits meiotic crossovers?

Comment on: Crismani W, et al. Science 2012; 336:1588-90.     

What limits photosynthesis? Identifying the thermodynamic constraints of the terrestrial biosphere within the Earth system

Photosynthesis converts sunlight into the chemical free energy that feeds the Earth's biosphere, yet at levels much lower than what thermodynamics would allow for. I propose here that photosynthesis is nevertheless thermodynamically limited, but this limit acts indirectly on the material exchange. I substantiate this proposition for the photosynthetic activity of terrestrial ecosystems, which are notably more productive than the marine biosphere. The material exchange for terrestrial photosynthesis involves water and carbon dioxide, which I evaluate using global observation-based datasets of radiation, photosynthesis, precipitation and evaporation. I first calculate the conversion efficiency of photosynthesis in terrestrial ecosystems and its climatological variation, with a median efficiency of 0.77% (n = 13,274). The rates tightly correlate with evaporation on land (r² = 0.87), which demonstrates the importance of the coupling of photosynthesis to material exchange. I then infer evaporation from the maximum material exchange between the surface and the atmosphere that is thermodynamically possible using datasets of solar radiation and precipitation. This inferred rate closely correlates with the observation-based land evaporation dataset (r² = 0.84). When this rate is converted back into photosynthetic activity, the resulting patterns correlate highly with the observation-based dataset (r² = 0.66). This supports the interpretation that it is not energy directly that limits terrestrial photosynthesis, but rather the material exchange that is driven by sunlight. This interpretation can explain the very low, observed conversion efficiency of photosynthesis in terrestrial ecosystems as well as its spatial variations. More generally, this implies that one needs to take the necessary material flows and exchanges associated with life into account to understand the thermodynamics of life. This, ultimately, requires a perspective that links the activity of the biosphere to the thermodynamic constraints of transport processes in the Earth system.     

What limits the efficiency of double-strand break-dependent stress-induced mutation in Escherichia coli?

Stress-induced mutation is a collection of molecular mechanisms in bacterial, yeast and human cells that promote mutagenesis specifically when cells are maladapted to their environment, i.e. when they are stressed. Here, we review one molecular mechanism: double-strand break (DSB)-dependent stress-induced mutagenesis described in starving Escherichia coli. In it, the otherwise high-fidelity process of DSB repair by homologous recombination is switched to an error-prone mode under the control of the RpoS general stress response, which licenses the use of error-prone DNA polymerase, DinB, in DSB repair. This mechanism requires DSB repair proteins, RpoS, the SOS response and DinB. This pathway underlies half of spontaneous chromosomal frameshift and base substitution mutations in starving E. coli [Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011;108:13659-13664], yet appeared less efficient in chromosomal than F' plasmid-borne genes. Here, we demonstrate and quantify DSB-dependent stress-induced reversion of a chromosomal lac allele with DSBs supplied by I-SceI double-strand endonuclease. I-SceI-induced reversion of this allele was previously studied in an F'. We compare the efficiencies of mutagenesis in the two locations. When we account for contributions of an F'-borne extra dinB gene, strain background differences, and bypass considerations of rates of spontaneous DNA breakage by providing I-SceI cuts, the chromosome is still ～100 times less active than F. We suggest that availability of a homologous partner molecule for recombinational break repair may be limiting. That partner could be a duplicated chromosomal segment or sister chromosome.     

What are the relative costs,limits and correlates of increased degree of serotiny?

There is variability in the period that serotinous species retain seeds in protective closed cones and in the sizes of the cones. Seed predation and inter‐fire recruitment have been suggested to be reasons for this variability. I argue against these two reasons. Variation in annual rates of increase in fecundity and in numbers of flowering episodes before fire should be correlated with the degree of serotiny. These two attributes are a consequence of cone size, plant architecture and degree of serotiny.     

Are glycosyltransferases the evolutionary antecedents of the immunoglobulins?

The glycosyltransferases may be the evolutionary precursors of the immunoglobulins, although critical evidence for this hypothesis is not yet available. The transferases add sugars to non-glycosylated proteins, lipids, and organic molecules, as well as to oligosaccharides, glycoproteins, and glycolipids. The enzymes are specific, extremely polymorphic, occasionally inducible, and may be structurally related to one another. Circumstantial evidence links the transferases to both the MHC and T/t loci in the mouse. Finally, antibodies against purified transferases are difficult to produce and sometimes they react with immunoglobulins. The present hypothesis predicts that transferases should show some sequence homology with immunoglobulins, and that some MHC proteins will be glycosyltransferases.     

What makes bacterial pathogens so sticky?

Pathogenic bacteria use a variety of cell surface adhesins to promote binding to host tissues and protein-coated biomaterials, as well as cell–cell aggregation. These cellular interactions represent the first essential step that leads to host colonization and infection. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) has greatly contributed to increase our understanding of the specific interactions at play during microbial adhesion, down to the single-molecule level. A key asset of AFM is that adhesive interactions are studied under mechanical force, which is highly relevant as surface-attached pathogens are often exposed to physical stresses in the human body. These studies have identified sophisticated binding mechanisms in adhesins, which represent promising new targets for antiadhesion therapy.     

Keeping pace with climate change: what is wrong with the evolutionary potential of upper thermal limits?

The potential of populations to evolve in response to ongoing climate change is partly conditioned by the presence of heritable genetic variation in relevant physiological traits. Recent research suggests that Drosophila melanogaster exhibits negligible heritability, hence little evolutionary potential in heat tolerance when measured under slow heating rates that presumably mimic conditions in nature. Here, we study the effects of directional selection for increased heat tolerance using Drosophila as a model system. We combine a physiological model to simulate thermal tolerance assays with multilocus models for quantitative traits. Our simulations show that, whereas the evolutionary response of the genetically determined upper thermal limit (CTmax) is independent of methodological context, the response in knockdown temperatures varies with measurement protocol and is substantially (up to 50%) lower than for CTmax. Realized heritabilities of knockdown temperature may grossly underestimate the true heritability of CTmax. For instance, assuming that the true heritability of CTmax in the base population is h² = 0.25, realized heritabilities of knockdown temperature are around 0.08–0.16 depending on heating rate. These effects are higher in slow heating assays, suggesting that flawed methodology might explain the apparently limited evolutionary potential of cosmopolitan D. melanogaster.     

What are the evolutionary origins of stomatal responses to abscisic acid in land plants?

The evolution of active stomatal closure in response to leaf water deficit, mediated by the hormone abscisic acid (ABA), has been the subject of recent debate. Two different models for the timing of the evolution of this response recur in the literature. A single‐step model for stomatal control suggests that stomata evolved active, ABA‐mediated control of stomatal aperture, when these structures first appeared, prior to the divergence of bryophyte and vascular plant lineages. In contrast, a gradualistic model for stomatal control proposes that the most basal vascular plant stomata responded passively to changes in leaf water status. This model suggests that active ABA‐driven mechanisms for stomatal responses to water status instead evolved after the divergence of seed plants, culminating in the complex, ABA‐mediated responses observed in modern angiosperms. Here we review the findings that form the basis for these two models, including recent work that provides critical molecular insights into resolving this intriguing debate, and find strong evidence to support a gradualistic model for stomatal evolution.     

What limits nitrate uptake from soil?

Abstract. An accepted view, that unless nitrate concentrations in the soil solution are very low (e.g. below 0.1–0.2 mol m^?3) the growth of high-yielding crops is not limited by the availability of nitrogen, is challenged. Conventional analyses of nutrient supply and demand, based on calculations of apparent inflow rates (uptake rates per unit total root length) are invalid. Apparent inflow rates are inversely proportional to root length. The convention of using total root length grossly overestimates the fraction of the root system active in nutrient uptake. Consequently, inflow rates based on total root lengths underestimate the true values, indicating unrealistically low nutrient concentration differentials between bulk soil and root surfaces required to drive uptake. An alternative method of analysis is suggested. This is based on total nutrient uptake rather than on inflow rate. Measurements of the former do not depend on estimates of active root length and can be made directly and reliably. The method was applied to data obtained from a pot experiment using spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L., cv. Wembley) grown in soil without nitrogen fertilizer (N₀) or with nitrogen fertilizer equivalent to 200kg N ha^?1 (N⁺). Soil nitrate concentrations calculated using the conventional method based on total root length, suggested that any increases in concentration above those measured in the N⁰ treatment should not have resulted in increased uptake and growth. However, the N⁺ plants were always bigger than those in the No treatment, refuting this suggestion. Theoretical uptakes of nitrogen (calculated initially on the basis of a fully active root system) were adjusted, by reducing the effective root length incrementally, until the theoretical uptake matched the measured net uptake of nitrogen. The mean fractions of the root systems likely to have been involved in nitrate uptake were 11% and 3.5% of the total lengths of root in the N⁰ and N⁺ treatments, respectively.