Archaeal histone selection of nucleosome positioning sequences and the procaryotic origin of histone-dependent genome evolution

Archaeal histones and the eucaryal (eucaryotic) nucleosome core histones have almost identical histone folds. Here, we show that DNA molecules selectively incorporated by rHMfB (recombinant archaeal histone B from Methanothermus fervidus) into archaeal nucleosomes from a mixture of approximately 10(14) random sequence molecules contain sequence motifs shown previously to direct eucaryal nucleosome positioning. The dinucleotides GC, AA (=TT) and TA are repeated at approximately 10 bp intervals, with the GC harmonic displaced approximately 5 bp from the AA and TA harmonics [(GCN(3)AA or TA)(n)]. AT and CG were not strongly selected, indicating that TA not equalAT and GC not equalCG in terms of facilitating archaeal nucleosome assembly. The selected molecules have affinities for rHMfB ranging from approximately 9 to 18-fold higher than the level of affinity of the starting population, and direct the positioned assembly of archaeal nucleosomes. Fourier-transform analyses have revealed that AA dinucleotides are much enriched at approximately 10. 1 bp intervals, the helical repeat of DNA wrapped around a nucleosome, in the genomes of Eucarya and the histone-containing Euryarchaeota, but not in the genomes of Bacteria and Crenarchaeota, procaryotes that do not have histones. Facilitating histone packaging of genomic DNA has apparently therefore imposed constraints on genome sequence evolution, and since archaeal histones have no structure in addition to the histone fold, these constraints must result predominantly from histone fold-DNA contacts. Based on the three-domain universal phylogeny, histones and histone-dependent genome sequence evolution most likely evolved after the bacterial-archaeal divergence but before the archaeal-eucaryal divergence, and were subsequently lost in the Crenarchaeota. However, with lateral gene transfer, the first histone fold could alternatively have evolved after the archaeal-eucaryal divergence, early in either the euryarchaeal or eucaryal lineages.     

Histone stoichiometry and DNA circularization in archaeal nucleosomes.

Recombinant (r)HMfB (archaealhistone B fromMethanothermusfervidus) formed complexes with increasing stability with DNA molecules increasing in length from 52 to 100 bp, but not with a 39 bp molecule. By using125I-labeled rHMfB-YY (an rHMfB variant with I31Y and M35Y replacements) and32P-labeled 100 bp DNA, these complexes, designated archaeal nucleosomes, have been shown to contain an archaeal histone tetramer. Consistent with DNA bending and wrapping, addition of DNA ligase to archaeal nucleosomes assembled with 88 and 128 bp DNAs resulted in covalently-closed monomeric circular DNAs which, following histone removal, were positively supercoiled based on their electrophoretic mobilities in the presence of ethidium bromide before and after relaxation by calf thymus topoisomerase I. Ligase addition to mixtures of rHMfB with 53 or 30 bp DNA molecules also resulted in circular DNAs but these were circular dimers and trimers. These short DNA molecules apparently had to be ligated into longer linear multimers for assembly into archaeal nucleosomes and ligation into circles. rHMfB assembled into archaeal nucleosomes at lower histone to DNA ratios with the supercoiled, circular ligation product than with the original 88 bp linear version of this molecule. Archaeal histones are most similar to the globular histone fold region of eukaryal histone H4, and the results reported are consistent with archaeal nucleosomes resembling the structure formed by eukaryal histone (H3+H4)2tetramers.     

Mutational analysis of archaeal histone-DNA interactions

Site-specific mutagenesis of the hmfB gene cloned from the archaeon Methanothermus fervidus, followed by expression in Escherichia coli, has been used to generate approximately 90 recombinant (r) variants of the archaeal histone HMfB. The abilities of these variants to form stable archaeal nucleosome-containing complexes with linear pBR322 DNA, and with an 89 bp restriction fragment of this DNA have been determined. Variants that failed to form such complexes, based on negative gel-shift assays, had substitutions at the N terminus or within the alpha1, L1 and L2 regions of the rHMfB histone fold, at sites predicted to be homologous to eucaryal histone fold residues that contact the DNA in the eucaryal nucleosome. Variants that failed to give gel shifts were further assayed for their abilities to facilitate ligase-catalyzed circularization of a linear 88 bp DNA molecule, and to reduce the ellipticity of a DNA solution at 275 nm (theta(275)). Consistent with cooperative but independent sites of DNA binding, a combination of three residue substitutions, one each in alpha1, L1 and L2, was required to generate a rHMfB variant with no detectable DNA binding based on gel shift, circularization and theta(275) reduction assays.     

Crystal structures of recombinant histones HMfA and HMfB from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Methanothermus fervidus

The hyperthermophilic archaeon Methanothermus fervidus contains two small basic proteins, HMfA (68 amino acid residues) and HMfB (69 residues) that share a common ancestry with the eukaryal nucleosome core histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4. HMfA and HMfB have sequences that differ at 11 locations, they have different structural stabilities, and the complexes that they form with DNA have different electrophoretic mobilities. Here, crystal structures are documented for recombinant (r) HMfA at a resolution of 1.55 A refined to a crystallographic R-value of 19.8 % (tetragonal form) and at 1.48 A refined to a R-value of 18.8 % (orthorhombic form), and for rHMfB at 1.9 A refined to a R-value of 18.0 %. The rHMfA and rHMfB monomers have structures that are just histone folds in which a long central alpha-helix (alpha2; 29 residues) is separated from shorter N-terminal (alpha1; 11 residues) and C-terminal (alpha3; 10 residues) alpha-helices by two loops (L1 and L2; both 6 residues). Within L1 and L2, three adjacent residues are in extended (beta) conformation. rHMfA and rHMfB assemble into homodimers, with the alpha2 helices anti-parallel aligned and crossing at an angle of close to 35 degrees, and with hydrogen bonds formed between the extended, parallel regions of L1 and L2 resulting in short beta-ladders. Dimerization creates a novel N-terminal structure that contains four proline residues, two from each monomer. As prolines are present at these positions in all archaeal histone sequences, this proline-tetrad structure is likely to be a common feature of all archaeal histone dimers. Almost all residues that participate in monomer-monomer interactions are conserved in HMfA and HMfB, consistent with the ability of these monomers to form both homodimers and (HMfA+HMfB) heterodimers. Differences in side-chain interactions that result from non-conservative residue differences in HMfA and HMfB are identified, and the structure of a (rHMfA)(2)-DNA complex is presented based on the structures documented here and modeled by homology to histone-DNA interactions in the eukaryal nucleosome.     

Both DNA and histone fold sequences contribute to archaeal nucleosome stability.

The roles and interdependence of DNA sequence and archaeal histone fold structure in determining archaeal nucleosome stability and positioning have been determined and quantitated. The presence of four tandem copies of TTTAAAGCCG in the polylinker region of pLITMUS28 resulted in a DNA molecule with increased affinity (DeltaDeltaG of approximately 700 cal mol(-1)) for the archaeal histone HMfB relative to the polylinker sequence, and the dominant, quantitative contribution of the helical repeats of the dinucleotide TA to this increased affinity has been established. The rotational and translational positioning of archaeal nucleosomes assembled on the (TTTAAAGCCG)(4) sequence and on DNA molecules selectively incorporated into archaeal nucleosomes by HMfB have been determined. Alternating A/T- and G/C-rich regions were located where the minor and major grooves, respectively, sequentially faced the archaeal nucleosome core, and identical positioning results were obtained using HMfA, a closely related archaeal histone also from Methanothermus fervidus. However, HMfA did not have similarly high affinities for the HMfB-selected DNA molecules, and domain-swap experiments have shown that this difference in affinity is determined by residue differences in the C-terminal region of alpha-helix 3 of the histone fold, a region that is not expected to directly interact with DNA. Rather this region is thought to participate in forming the histone dimer:dimer interface at the center of an archaeal nucleosome histone tetramer core. If differences in this interface do result in archaeal histone cores with different sequence preferences, then the assembly of alternative archaeal nucleosome tetramer cores could provide an unanticipated and novel structural mechanism to regulate gene expression.     

Archaeal nucleosome positioning sequence from Methanothermus fervidus.

DNA in Methanothermus fervidus, a hyperthermophilic archaeon, is constrained into archaeal nucleosomes in vivo by the archaeal histones HMfA and HMfB. Here, we document the translational and rotational positioning of archaeal nucleosome assembly in vitro by a sequence from the 7S RNA encoding region of the M. fervidus genome. The minor groove of the DNA at the center of the DNA sequence, protected from micrococcal nuclease digestion by incorporation into a positioned archaeal nucleosome, faces away from the archaeal histone core.     

Histones and chromatin structure in hyperthermophilic Archaea

Abstract: HMf is a histone from the hyperthermophile Methanothermus fervidus . It is the archetype and most studied member of a family of archaeal histones that have primary sequences and three-dimensional structures in common with the eukaryal nucleosome core histones and that bind and compact DNA molecules into nucleosome-like structures (NLS). HMf preparations are mixtures of two similar, small (∼7.5 kDa) polypeptides designated HMfA and HMfB that in vivo form both homodimers and heterodimers. HMfA synthesis predominates during exponential growth but the relative amount of HMfB increases as M. fervidus cells enter the stationary growth phase. Analyses of homogeneous preparations of recombinant (r) (HMfA)₂ and (rHMfB)₂ have demonstrated that these proteins have different DNA-binding and compaction properties in vitro, consistent with different roles in vivo for the (HMfA)₂, (HMfB)₂ and HMfA · HMfB dimers, and for the NLS that they form, in regulating gene expression and in genome compaction and stability.     

Negative constrained DNA supercoiling in archaeal nucleosomes

Archaeal histones have significant sequence and structural similarity to their eukaryal counterparts. However, whereas DNA is wrapped in negatively constrained supercoils in eukaryal nucleosomes, it has been reported that DNA is positively supercoiled by archaeal nucleosomes. This was inferred from experiments performed at low temperature and low salt concentrations, conditions markedly different from those expected for many archaea in vivo. Here, we report that the archaeal histones HMf and HTz wrap DNA in negatively constrained supercoils in buffers containing potassium glutamate (K-Glu) above 300 mM, either at 37 degrees C or at 70 degrees C. This suggests that high salt concentrations allow an alternate archaeal nucleosome topology: a left-handed tetramer rather than the right-handed tetramer seen in low salt conditions. In contrast, the archaeal histone MkaH produces DNA negative supercoiling at all salt concentrations, suggesting that this duality of structure is not possible for this atypical protein, which is formed by the association of two histone folds in a single polypeptide. These results extend the already remarkable similarity between archaeal and eukaryal nucleosomes, as it has been recently shown that DNA can be wrapped into either positive or negative supercoils around the H3/H4 tetramer. Negative supercoiling could correspond to the predominant physiological mode of DNA supercoiling in archaeal nucleosomes.     

Large scale preparation of positively supercoiled DNA using the archaeal histone HMf.

A technique to prepare relatively large quantities (>/=100 microg) of highly positively supercoiled DNA is reported. This uses a recombinant archaeal histone (rHMfB) to introduce toroidal supercoils, and an inexpensive chicken blood extract to relax unrestrained superhelical tension. Preparation of positively supercoiled pUC19 DNA molecules, >50% of which have linking number changes ranging from+8 to+17, is demonstrated. Advantages include the high degree of positive supercoiling that can be achieved, control over the extent of supercoiling, easy production of relatively large quantities of supercoiled DNA, and low cost.     

Mutational analysis of differences in thermostability between histones from mesophilic and hyperthermophilic archaea

Amino acid residues responsible for the large difference in thermostability between HMfB and HFoB, archaeal histones from the hyperthermophile Methanothermus fervidus and the mesophile Methanobacterium formicicum, respectively, have been identified by site-specific mutagenesis. The thermal denaturation of approximately 70 archaeal histone variants has been monitored by circular dichroism, and the data generated were fit to a two-state unfolding model (dimer-->two random coil monomers) to obtain a standard-state (1M) melting temperature for each variant dimer. The results of single-, double-, and triple-residue substitutions reveal that the much higher stability of rHMfB dimers, relative to rHFoB dimers, is conferred predominantly by improved intermolecular hydrophobic interactions near the center of the histone dimer core and by additional favorable ion pairs on the dimer surface.     

Conserved eukaryotic histone-fold residues substituted into an archaeal histone increase DNA affinity but reduce complex flexibility

Although the archaeal and eukaryotic nucleosome core histones evolved from a common ancestor, conserved lysine residues are present at DNA-binding locations in all four eukaryotic histones that are not present in the archaeal histones. Introduction of lysine residues at the corresponding locations into an archaeal histone, HMfB, generated a variant with increased affinity for DNA that formed more compact complexes with DNA. However, these complexes no longer facilitated the circularization of short DNA molecules and had lost the flexibility to wrap DNA alternatively in either a negative or positive supercoil.     

Histones and nucleosomes in Archaea and Eukarya: a comparative analysis

Archaeal histones from mesophilic, thermophilic, and hyperthermophilic members of the Euryarchaeota have primary sequences, the histone fold, tertiary structures, and dimer formation in common with the eukaryal nucleosome core histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4. Archaeal histones form nucleoprotein complexes in vitro and in vivo, designated archaeal nucleosomes, that contain histone tetramers and protect approximately 60 base pairs of DNA from nuclease digestion. Based on the sequence and structural homologies and experimental data reviewed here, archaeal nucleosomes appear similar, and may be homologous in evolutionary terms and function, to the structure at the center of the eukaryal nucleosome formed by the histone (H3+H4)₂ tetramer. Received: January 22, 1998 / Accepted: February 16, 1998     

Conserved Substitution Patterns around Nucleosome Footprints in Eukaryotes and Archaea Derive from Frequent Nucleosome Repositioning through Evolution

Nucleosomes, the basic repeat units of eukaryotic chromatin, have been suggested to influence the evolution of eukaryotic genomes, both by altering the propensity of DNA to mutate and by selection acting to maintain or exclude nucleosomes in particular locations. Contrary to the popular idea that nucleosomes are unique to eukaryotes, histone proteins have also been discovered in some archaeal genomes. Archaeal nucleosomes, however, are quite unlike their eukaryotic counterparts in many respects, including their assembly into tetramers (rather than octamers) from histone proteins that lack N- and C-terminal tails. Here, we show that despite these fundamental differences the association between nucleosome footprints and sequence evolution is strikingly conserved between humans and the model archaeon Haloferax volcanii. In light of this finding we examine whether selection or mutation can explain concordant substitution patterns in the two kingdoms. Unexpectedly, we find that neither the mutation nor the selection model are sufficient to explain the observed association between nucleosomes and sequence divergence. Instead, we demonstrate that nucleosome-associated substitution patterns are more consistent with a third model where sequence divergence results in frequent repositioning of nucleosomes during evolution. Indeed, we show that nucleosome repositioning is both necessary and largely sufficient to explain the association between current nucleosome positions and biased substitution patterns. This finding highlights the importance of considering the direction of causality between genetic and epigenetic change.     

Influence of DNA topology and histone tails in nucleosome organization on pBR322 DNA.

Recently, we have found that the assembly of nucleosomes reconstituted on negatively supercoiled DNA is cooperative. In the present paper the role of DNA topology and of histone tails in nucleosome assembly was explored. Reconstituted minichromosomes on relaxed DNA at different histone/DNA ratios (R) were assayed by topological analysis and electron microscopy visualization. Both methods show a linear relationship between average nucleosome number (N) and R. This suggests that in the case of relaxed DNA, cooperative internucleosomal interactions are small or absent. The influence of histone tails in nucleosome assembly was studied on minichromosomes reconstituted with trypsinized histone octamer on negatively supercoiled DNA by topological analysis. The topoisomers distribution, after trypsinization, dramatically changes, indicating that nucleosome-nucleosome interactions are remarkably decreased. These results show that, in chromatin folding, in addition to the well known role of histone H1, the interactions between histone octamer tails and DNA are also of importance.     

Effect of trypsinization and histone H5 addition on DNA twist and topology in reconstituted minichromosomes.

Free DNA in solution exhibits an untwisting of the double helix with increasing temperature. We have shown previously that when DNA is reconstituted with histones to form nucleosome core particles, both the core DNA and the adjacent linker DNA are constrained from thermal untwisting. The origin of this constraint is unknown. Here we examine the effect of two modifications of nucleosome structure on the constraint against thermal untwisting, and also on DNA topology. In one experiment, we removed the highly positively charged histone amino and carboxy termini by trypsinization. Alternatively, we added histone H5, a histone H1 variant from chick erythrocytes. Neither of these modifications had any major effect on DNA topology or twist in the nucleosome.     

Archaeal histone tetramerization determines DNA affinity and the direction of DNA supercoiling

DNA binding and the topology of DNA have been determined in complexes formed by >20 archaeal histone variants and archaeal histone dimer fusions with residue replacements at sites responsible for histone fold dimer:dimer interactions. Almost all of these variants have decreased affinity for DNA. They have also lost the flexibility of the wild type archaeal histones to wrap DNA into a negative or positive supercoil depending on the salt environment; they wrap DNA into positive supercoils under all salt conditions. The histone folds of the archaeal histones, HMfA and HMfB, from Methanothermus fervidus are almost identical, but (HMfA)(2) and (HMfB)(2) homodimers assemble into tetramers with sequence-dependent differences in DNA affinity. By construction and mutagenesis of HMfA+HMfB and HMfB+HMfA histone dimer fusions, the structure formed at the histone dimer:dimer interface within an archaeal histone tetramer has been shown to determine this difference in DNA affinity. Therefore, by regulating the assembly of different archaeal histone dimers into tetramers that have different sequence affinities, the assembly of archaeal histone-DNA complexes could be localized and used to regulate gene expression.     

Roles for Gcn5 in promoting nucleosome assembly and maintaining genome integrity

The coordinated process of DNA replication and nucleosome assembly, termed replication-coupled (RC) nucleosome assembly, is important for the maintenance of genome integrity. Loss of genome integrity is linked to aging and cancer. RC nucleosome assembly involves deposition of histone H3-H4 by the histone chaperones CAF-1, Rtt106 and Asf1 onto newly-replicated DNA. Coordinated actions of these three histone chaperones are regulated by modifications on the histone proteins. One such modification is histone H3 lysine 56 acetylation (H3K56Ac), a mark of newly-synthesized histone H3 that regulates the interaction between H3-H4 and the histone chaperones CAF-1 and Rtt106 following DNA replication and DNA repair. Recently, we have shown that the lysine acetyltransferase Gcn5 and H3 N-terminal tail lysine acetylation also regulates the interaction between H3-H4 and CAF-1 to promote the deposition of newly-synthesized histones. Genetic studies indicate that Gcn5 and Rtt109, the H3K56Ac lysine acetyltransferase, function in parallel to maintain genome stability. Utilizing synthetic genetic array analysis, we set out to identify additional genes that function in parallel with Gcn5 in response to DNA damage. We summarize here the role of Gcn5 in nucleosome assembly and suggest that Gcn5 impacts genome integrity via multiple mechanisms, including nucleosome assembly.