High‐Energy Aqueous Lithium Batteries

Owing to the high voltage of lithium‐ion batteries (LIBs), the dominating electrolyte is non‐aqueous. The idea of an aqueous rechargeable lithium battery (ARLB) dates back to 1994, but it had attracted little attention due to the narrow stable potential window of aqueous electrolytes, which results in low energy density. However, aqueous electrolytes were employed during the 2000s for the fundamental studies of electrode materials in the absence of side reactions such as the decomposition of organic species. The high solubility of lithium bis(trifluoromethane sulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI) in water has introduced new opportunities for high‐voltage ARLBs. Nonetheless, these ideas are somehow overshadowed by the common perception about the essential limitation of the aqueous electrolyte. The electrochemical behaviour of conventional electrode materials can be substantially tuned in the water‐in‐salt electrolytes. The latest idea of utilising a graphite anode in the aqueous water‐in‐salt electrolytes has paved the way towards not only 4‐V ARLB but also a new generation of Li?S batteries with a higher operating voltage and energy efficiency. Furthermore, aqueous electrolytes can provide a cathodically stable environment for Li?O₂ batteries. The present paper aims to highlight these emerging opportunities possibly leading to a new generation of LIBs, which can be substantially cheaper and safer.     

Recent Advances in Non‐Aqueous Electrolyte for Rechargeable Li–O2 Batteries

The rechargeable Li–O₂ battery has attracted much attention over the past decades owing to its overwhelming advantage in theoretical specific energy density compared to state‐of‐the‐art Li‐ion batteries. Practical application requires non‐aqueous Li–O₂ batteries to stably obtain high reversible capacity, which highly depends on a suitable electrolyte system. Up to now, some critical challenges remain in developing desirable non‐aqueous electrolytes for Li–O₂ batteries. Herein, we will review the current status and challenges in non‐aqueous liquid electrolytes, ionic liquid electrolytes and solid‐state electrolytes of Li–O₂ batteries, as well as the perspectives on these issues and future development.     

A Universal Principle to Design Reversible Aqueous Batteries Based on Deposition–Dissolution Mechanism

Conventional charge storage mechanisms for electrode materials are common in widely exploited insertion/extraction processes, while some sporadic examples of chemical conversion mechanisms exist. It is perceived to be of huge potential, but it is quite challenging to develop new battery chemistry to promote battery performance. Here, an initiating and holistic deposition–dissolution battery mechanism for both cathodes and anodes is reported. A MnO₂–Cu battery based on this mechanism demonstrates outstanding energy density (27.7 mWh cm^?2), power density (1232 mW cm^?2), high reversibility, and unusual Coulombic efficiency. It can be charged to 0.8 mAh cm^?2 within 42 s and possessees a stable rate cyclability within vastly varied discharging current density (4–64 mA cm^?2). Moreover, the deposition–dissolution mechanism can be universally adopted and derived such that the corresponding MnO₂–Zn and MnO₂–Bi batteries are successfully constructed. The material selection principle, deposition–dissolution behaviors of cathode/anode materials, and battery performance are systematically elaborated. Since the electrodeposition chemistry is capable of involving a large family of materials, for example, metal oxides as cathode materials, or metals as anode materials, the research could be a model system to open a door to explore new aqueous battery materials and chemistry.     

Dual Anion–Cation Reversible Insertion in a Bipyridinium–Diamide Triad as the Negative Electrode for Aqueous Batteries

Aqueous batteries are an emerging candidate for low‐cost and environmentally friendly grid storage systems. Designing such batteries from inexpensive, abundant, recyclable, and nontoxic organic active materials provides a logical step toward improving both the environmental and economic impact of these systems. Herein the first ever battery material that works with simultaneous uptake and release of both cations and anions is proposed by coupling p‐type (bipyridinium) and n‐type (naphthalene diimide) redox moieties. It represents one of a new family of electrode materials which demonstrates an optimal oxidation potential (?0.47 V vs saturated calomel electrode), extremely fast kinetics, a highly competitive capacity (63 mA h g^?1 at 4C), and cyclability in both neutral Na⁺ and Mg²⁺ electrolytes of molar range concentration. Through a combination of UV–vis spectroelectrochemistry, electrochemical quartz‐crystal microbalance, Operando synchrotron‐X‐ray diffraction, and density functional theory calculations a novel dual cation/anion insertion mechanism was proven and rationalized. Based on these findings, this innovative p/n‐type product may well provide a viable option for use as a negative electrode material, thereby promoting the design of cutting‐edge, low‐cost, rocking‐chair dual‐ion aqueous batteries.     

Hybrid and Aqueous Lithium‐Air Batteries

Lithium‐air (Li‐air) batteries have become attractive because of their extremely high theoretical energy density. However, conventional Li‐air cells operating with non‐aqueous electrolytes suffer from poor cycle life and low practical energy density due to the clogging of the porous air cathode by insoluble discharge products, contamination of the organic electrolyte and lithium metal anode by moist air, and decomposition of the electrolyte during cycling. These difficulties may be overcome by adopting a cell configuration that consists of a lithium‐metal anode protected from air by a Li⁺‐ion solid electrolyte and an air electrode in an aqueous catholyte. In this type of configuration, a Li⁺‐ion conducting “buffer” layer between the lithium‐metal anode and the solid electrolyte is often necessary due to the instability of many solid electrolytes in contact with lithium metal. Based on the type of buffer layer, two different battery configurations are possible: “hybrid” Li‐air batteries and “aqueous” Li‐air batteries. The hybrid and aqueous Li‐air batteries utilize the same battery chemistry and face similar challenges that limit the cell performance. Here, an overview of recent developments in hybrid and aqueous Li‐air batteries is provided and the factors that influence their performance and impede their practical applications, followed by future directions are discussed.     

Metal‐Air Batteries: Metal–Air Batteries with High Energy Density: Li–Air versus Zn–Air (Adv. Energy Mater. 1/2011)

In the past decade, there have been exciting developments in the field of lithium ion batteries as energy storage devices, resulting in the application of lithium ion batteries in areas ranging from small portable electric devices to large power systems such as hybrid electric vehicles. However, the maximum energy density of current lithium ion batteries having topatactic chemistry is not sufficient to meet the demands of new markets in such areas as electric vehicles. Therefore, new electrochemical systems with higher energy densities are being sought, and metal‐air batteries with conversion chemistry are considered a promising candidate. More recently, promising electrochemical performance has driven much research interest in Li‐air and Zn‐air batteries. This review provides an overview of the fundamentals and recent progress in the area of Li‐air and Zn‐air batteries, with the aim of providing a better understanding of the new electrochemical systems.     

Hydrated Intercalation for High‐Performance Aqueous Zinc Ion Batteries

Aqueous zinc ion batteries (AZIBs) are steadily gaining attention based on their attractive merits regarding cost and safety. However, there are many obstacles to overcome, especially in terms of finding suitable cathode materials and elucidating their reaction mechanisms. Here, a mixed‐valence vanadium oxide, V₆O₁₃, that functions as a stable cathode material in mildly acidic aqueous electrolytes is reported. Paired with a zinc metal anode, this material exhibits performance metrics of 360 mAh g^?1 at 0.2 A g^?1, 92% capacity retention after 2000 cycles, and 145 mAh g^?1 at a current density of 24.0 A g^?1. A combination of experiments and density functional theory calculations suggests that hydrated intercalation, where water molecules are cointercalated with Zn ions upon discharge, accounts for the aforementioned electrochemical performance. This intercalation mechanism facilitates Zn ion diffusion throughout the host lattice and electrode–electrolyte interface via electrostatic shielding and concurrent structural stabilization. Through a correlation of experimental data and theoretical calculations, the promise of utilizing hydrated intercalation as a means to achieve high‐performance AZIBs is demonstrated.     

Anthraquinone Derivatives in Aqueous Flow Batteries

Anthraquinone derivatives are being considered for large scale energy storage applications because of their chemical tunability and rapid redox kinetics. The authors investigate four anthraquinone derivatives as negative electrolyte candidates for an aqueous quinone‐bromide redox flow battery: anthraquinone‐2‐sulfonic acid (AQS), 1,8‐dihydroxyanthraquinone‐2,7‐disulfonic acid (DHAQDS), alizarin red S (ARS), and 1,4‐dihydroxyanthraquinone‐2,3‐dimethylsulfonic acid (DHAQDMS). The standard reduction potentials are all lower than that of anthraquinone‐2,7‐disulfonic acid (AQDS), the molecule used in previous quinone‐bromide batteries. DHAQDS and ARS undergo irreversible reactions on contact with bromine, which precludes their use against bromine but not necessarily against other electrolytes. DHAQDMS is apparently unreactive with bromine but cannot be reversibly reduced, whereas AQS is stable against bromine and stable upon reduction. The authors demonstrate an AQS‐bromide flow cell with higher open circuit potential and peak galvanic power density than the equivalent AQDS‐bromide cell. This study demonstrates the use of chemical synthesis to tailor organic molecules for improving flow battery performance.     

Metal‐Organic Framework Integrated Anodes for Aqueous Zinc‐Ion Batteries

Zinc‐based batteries have a high capacity and are safe, cost‐effective, environmentally‐friendly, and capable of scalable production. However, dendrite formation and poor reversibility hinder their performance. Metal‐organic framework (MOF)‐based Zn anodes are made by wet chemistry to address these issues. These MOF‐based anodes exhibit high efficiency during Zn plating‐stripping and prevent dendrite formation, as shown by ex situ SEM analysis. The practicality of the MOF‐based anodes is demonstrated in aqueous Zn ion batteries, which show improved performance including specific capacity, cycle life, and safety relative to the pristine Zn anode due to their hydrophilic and porous surface. These results, along with the easy scalability of the process, demonstrate the high potential of MOF‐modified Zn anodes for use in dendrite‐free, higher‐performance, Zn‐based energy storage systems.     

Opportunities and Reality of Aqueous Rechargeable Batteries

Despite the dominance of lithium‐ion batteries (LIBs) in today's battery market, they are not flawless. Accordingly, the battery community is striving to strengthen the global battery portfolio with alternative systems. One branch of this effort is research into aqueous rechargeable batteries (ARBs). The simplicity of this concept, as well as rising safety concerns in commercial LIBs, has attracted numerous ARB‐related investigations in the past decade. Such heightened interest calls for a critical assessment of the field, especially with respect to its current state and potential opportunities. This essay examines the reality of ARBs in terms of their current socio‐technological context, which has been formed through a long history of battery research and development, often intertwined with social demands of the time. Attention is directed toward rechargeable batteries, briefly discussing their history, chemistry, and applications. The emergence of LIBs and their quick rise to market dominance with the concurrent fall of primitive ARBs serves as context for evaluating the current reality for newly emerging ARBs. Assessing their current position in academia and the battery market allows us to identify future opportunities and hurdles for incorporating ARBs into the global battery portfolio.     

Recent Advances in Vanadium‐Based Aqueous Rechargeable Zinc‐Ion Batteries

Aqueous zinc‐ion batteries (AZIBs) have attracted considerable attention as promising next‐generation power sources because of the abundance, low cost, eco‐friendliness, and high security of Zn resources. Recently, vanadium‐based materials as cathodes in AZIBs have gained interest owing to their rich electrochemical interaction with Zn²⁺ and high theoretical capacity. However, existing AZIBs are still far from meeting commercial requirements. This article summarizes recent advances in the rational design of vanadium‐based materials toward AZIBs. In particular, it highlights various tactics that have been reported to increase the intercalation space, structural stability, and the diffusion ability of the guest Zn²⁺, as well as explores the structure‐dependent electrochemical performance and the corresponding energy storage mechanism. Furthermore, this article summarizes recent achievements in the optimization of aqueous electrolytes and Zn anodes to resolve the issues that remain with Zn anodes, including dendrite formation, passivation, corrosion, and the low coulombic efficiency of plating/stripping. The rationalization of these research findings can guide further investigations in the design of cathode/anode materials and electrolytes for next‐generation AZIBs.     

Highly Solvating Electrolytes for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries

There is a critical need to evaluate lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries with practically relevant high sulfur loadings and minimal electrolyte. Under such conditions, the concentration of soluble polysulfide intermediates in the electrolyte drastically increases, which can alter the fundamental nature of the solution‐mediated discharge and thereby the total sulfur utilization. In this work, an investigation into various high donor number (DN) electrolytes that allow for increased polysulfide dissolution is presented, and the way in which this property may in fact be necessary for increasing sulfur utilization at low electrolyte and high loading conditions is demonstrated. The solvents dimethylacetamide, dimethyl sulfoxide, and 1‐methylimidazole are holistically evaluated against dimethoxyethane as electrolyte co‐solvents in Li–S cells, and they are used to investigate chemical and electrochemical properties of polysulfide species at both dilute and practically relevant conditions. The nature of speciation exhibited by lithium polysulfides is found to vary significantly between these concentrations, particularly with regard to the S₃^?? species. Furthermore, the extent of the instability in conventional electrolyte solvents and high DN solvents with both lithium metal and polysulfides is thoroughly investigated. These studies establish a basis for future efforts into rationally designing an optimal electrolyte for a lean electrolyte, high energy density Li–S battery.     

Metal–Air Batteries with High Energy Density: Li–Air versus Zn–Air

In the past decade, there have been exciting developments in the field of lithium ion batteries as energy storage devices, resulting in the application of lithium ion batteries in areas ranging from small portable electric devices to large power systems such as hybrid electric vehicles. However, the maximum energy density of current lithium ion batteries having topatactic chemistry is not sufficient to meet the demands of new markets in such areas as electric vehicles. Therefore, new electrochemical systems with higher energy densities are being sought, and metal‐air batteries with conversion chemistry are considered a promising candidate. More recently, promising electrochemical performance has driven much research interest in Li‐air and Zn‐air batteries. This review provides an overview of the fundamentals and recent progress in the area of Li‐air and Zn‐air batteries, with the aim of providing a better understanding of the new electrochemical systems.     

High‐Fluorinated Electrolytes for Li–S Batteries

Rechargeable Li–S batteries are regarded as one of the most promising next‐generation energy‐storage systems. However, the inevitable formation of Li dendrites and the shuttle effect of lithium polysulfides significantly weakens electrochemical performance, preventing its practical application. Herein, a new class of localized high‐concentration electrolyte (LHCE) enabled by adding inert fluoroalkyl ether of 1H,1H,5H‐octafluoropentyl‐1,1,2,2‐tetrafluoroethyl ether into highly‐concentrated electrolytes (HCE) lithium bis(fluorosulfonyl) imide/dimethoxyether (DME) system is reported to suppress Li dendrite formation and minimize the solubility of the high‐order polysulfides in electrolytes, thus reducing the amount of electrolyte in cells. Such a unique LHCE can achieve a high coulombic efficiency of Li plating/stripping up to 99.3% and completely suppressing the shuttling effect, thus maintaining a S cathode capacity of 775 mAh g^?1 for 150 cycles with a lean electrolyte of 4.56 g A^?1 h^?1. The LHCE reduces the solubility of lithium polysulfides, allowing the Li/S cell to achieve super performance in a lean electrolyte. This conception of using inert diluents in a highly concentrated electrolyte can accelerate commercialization of Li–S battery technology.