Non-chemotactic Dictyostelium discoideum mutants with altered cGMP signal transduction

Folic acid and cAMP are chemoattractants in Dictyostelium discoideum, which bind to different surface receptors. The signal is transduced from the receptors via different G proteins into a common pathway which includes guanylyl cyclase and acto-myosin. To investigate this common pathway, ten mutants which do not react chemotactically to both cAMP and folic acid were isolated with a simple new chemotactic assay. Genetic analysis shows that one of these mutants (KI-10) was dominant; the other nine mutants were recessive, and comprise nine complementation groups. In wild-type cells, the chemoattractants activate adenylyl cyclase, phospholipase C, and guanylyl cyclase in a transient manner. In mutant cells the formation of cAMP and IP3 were generally normal, whereas the cGMP response was altered in most of the ten mutants. Particularly, mutant KI-8 has strongly reduced basal guanylyl cyclase activity; the enzyme is present in mutant KI-10, but can not be activated by cAMP or folic acid. The cGMP response of five other mutants is altered in either magnitude, dose dependency, or kinetics. These observations suggest that the second messenger cGMP plays a key role in chemotaxis in Dictyostelium.     

Relationship of pseudopod extension to chemotactic hormone-induced actin polymerization in amoeboid cells

Aggregation-competent amoeboid cells of Dictyostelium discoideum are chemotactic toward cAMP. Video microscopy and scanning electron microscopy were used to quantitate changes in cell morphology and locomotion during uniform upshifts in the concentration of cAMP. These studies demonstrate that morphological and motile responses to cAMP are sufficiently synchronous within a cell population to allow relevant biochemical analyses to be performed on large numbers of cells. Changes in cell behavior were correlated with F-actin content by using an NBD-phallacidin binding assay. These studies demonstrate that actin polymerization occurs in two stages in response to stimulation of cells with extracellular cAMP and involves the addition of monomers to the cytochalasin D-sensitive (barbed) ends of actin filaments. The second stage of actin assembly, which peaks at 60 sec following an upshift in cAMP concentration, is temporally correlated with the growth of new pseudopods. The F-actin assembled by 60 sec is localized in these new pseudopods. These results indicate that actin polymerization may constitute one of the driving forces for pseudopod extension in amoeboid cells and that nucleation sites regulating polymerization are under the control of chemotaxis receptors.     

Chemoattractant-mediated transient activation and membrane localization of Akt/PKB is required for efficient chemotaxis to cAMP in Dictyostelium

Chemotaxis-competent cells respond to a variety of ligands by activating second messenger pathways leading to changes in the actin/myosin cytoskeleton and directed cell movement. We demonstrate that Dictyostelium Akt/PKB, a homologue of mammalian Akt/PKB, is very rapidly and transiently activated by the chemoattractant cAMP. This activation takes place through G protein-coupled chemoattractant receptors via a pathway that requires homologues of mammalian p110 phosphoinositide-3 kinase. pkbA null cells exhibit aggregation-stage defects that include aberrant chemotaxis, a failure to polarize properly in a chemoattractant gradient and aggregation at low densities. Mechanistically, we demonstrate that the PH domain of Akt/PKB fused to GFP transiently translocates to the plasma membrane in response to cAMP with kinetics similar to those of Akt/PKB kinase activation and is localized to the leading edge of chemotaxing cells in vivo. Our results indicate Akt/PKB is part of the regulatory network required for sensing and responding to the chemoattractant gradient that mediates chemotaxis and aggregation.     

Genetic analysis of the role of G protein-coupled receptor signaling in electrotaxis

Cells display chemotaxis and electrotaxis by migrating directionally in gradients of specific chemicals or electrical potential. Chemotaxis in Dictyostelium discoideum is mediated by G protein–coupled receptors. The unique Gβ is essential for all chemotactic responses, although different chemoattractants use different receptors and Gα subunits. Dictyostelium amoebae show striking electrotaxis in an applied direct current electric field. Perhaps electrotaxis and chemotaxis share similar signaling mechanisms? Null mutation of Gβ and cAMP receptor 1 and Gα2 did not abolish electrotaxis, although Gβ-null mutations showed suppressed electrotaxis. By contrast, G protein signaling plays an essential role in chemotaxis. G protein–coupled receptor signaling was monitored with PHcrac–green fluorescent protein, which translocates to inositol phospholipids at the leading edge of cells during chemotaxis. There was no intracellular gradient of this protein during electrotaxis. However, F-actin was polymerized at the leading edge of cells during electrotaxis. We conclude that reception and transduction of the electrotaxis signal are largely independent of G protein–coupled receptor signaling and that the pathways driving chemotaxis and electrotaxis intersect downstream of heterotrimeric G proteins to invoke cytoskeletal elements.     

Signal transduction in neutrophil chemotaxis

This review discusses current knowledge on signal transduction pathways controlling chemotaxis of neutrophils and similar cells. Most neutrophil chemoattractants bind to seven-transmembrane-helix receptors. These receptors activate trimeric G proteins of the Gi class in neutrophils to initiate chemotaxis. Phospholipases Cbeta, phosphoinositide 3-kinase gamma, and PH domain-containing proteins play various roles in signaling further downstream. The actin cytoskeleton is crucial for cell motility, and is controlled by Rho family GTP-binding proteins. PIP 5-kinase, LIM kinase, myosin light chain kinase and phosphatase, or WASP-like proteins may be important links between Rho GTPases and actin during chemotaxis. Newly emerging ideas on the regulation of the "compass" of chemotaxing cells, which may involve Cdc42 and certain PH domain-containing proteins, are also presented.     

Actin cross-linking proteins cortexillin I and II are required for cAMP signaling during Dictyostelium chemotaxis and development

Starvation induces Dictyostelium amoebae to secrete cAMP, toward which other amoebae stream, forming multicellular mounds that differentiate and develop into fruiting bodies containing spores. We find that the double deletion of cortexillin (ctx) I and II alters the actin cytoskeleton and substantially inhibits all molecular responses to extracellular cAMP. Synthesis of cAMP receptor and adenylyl cyclase A (ACA) is inhibited, and activation of ACA, RasC, and RasG, phosphorylation of extracellular signal regulated kinase 2, activation of TORC2, and stimulation of actin polymerization and myosin assembly are greatly reduced. As a consequence, cell streaming and development are completely blocked. Expression of ACA-yellow fluorescent protein in the ctxI/ctxII-null cells significantly rescues the wild-type phenotype, indicating that the primary chemotaxis and development defect is the inhibition of ACA synthesis and cAMP production. These results demonstrate the critical importance of a properly organized actin cytoskeleton for cAMP-signaling pathways, chemotaxis, and development in Dictyostelium.     

Diverse chemotactic responses of Dictyostelium discoideum amoebae in the developing (temporal) and stationary (spatial) concentration gradients of folic acid,cAMP, Ca(2+) and Mg(2+)

The responses of Dictyostelium discoideum amoebae to developing (temporal) and stationary (spatial) gradients of folic acid, cAMP, Ca(2+), and Mg(2+) were studied using the methods of computer-aided image analysis. The results presented demonstrate that the new type of experimental chambers used for the observation of single cells moving within the investigated gradients of chemoattractants permit time lapse recording of single amoebae and determination of the trajectories of moving cells. It was found that, besides folic acid and cAMP (natural chemoattractants for Dictyostelium discoideum amoebae), also extracellular Ca(2+) and Mg(2+) are potent inducers of these cells' chemotaxis, and the amoebae of D. discoideum can respond to various chemoattractants differently. In the positively developing gradients of folic acid, cAMP, Ca(2+), and Mg(2+) oriented locomotion of amoebae directed towards the higher concentration of the tested chemoattractants was observed. However, in the negatively developing (temporal) and stationary linear (spatial) gradients, the univocal chemotaxis of amoebae was recorded only in the case of the Mg(2+) concentration gradient. This demonstrates that amoebae can respond to both developing and stationary gradients, depending upon the nature of the chemoattractant. We also investigated the effects of chosen inhibitors of signalling pathways upon chemotaxis of D. discoideum amoebae in the positively developing (temporal) gradients of tested chemoattractants. Verapamil was found to abolish the chemotaxis of amoebae only in the Ca(2+) gradients. Pertussis toxin suppressed the chemotactic response of cells in the gradients of folic acid and cAMP but did not prevent chemotaxis in those of Ca(2+) and Mg(2+), while quinacrine inhibited chemotaxis in the gradients of folic acid, cAMP, and Ca(2+) but only slightly affected chemotaxis in the Mg(2+) gradient. None of the tested inhibitors causes inhibition of cell random movement, when applied in isotropic solution. Also EDTA and EGTA up to 50 mM concentration did not inhibit locomotion of amoebae in control isotropic solutions.     

Making all the right moves: chemotaxis in neutrophils and Dictyostelium

Neutrophils and Dictyostelium discoideum share the ability to migrate directionally in response to external chemoattractant gradients. The binding of chemoattractants to specific receptors that are coupled to heterotrimeric G proteins leads to a wide range of biochemical responses that become highly localized as cells polarize and migrate by chemotaxis. The signaling mechanisms that lead to the predominant polymerization of F-actin at the front of cells for propulsion and to myosin II assembly at the sides to suppress lateral pseudopod formation and at the back for retraction are now beginning to emerge.     

Tumor suppressor PTEN mediates sensing of chemoattractant gradients

Shallow gradients of chemoattractants, sensed by G protein-linked signaling pathways, elicit localized binding of PH domains specific for PI(3,4,5)P3 at sites on the membrane where rearrangements of the cytoskeleton and pseudopod extension occur. Disruption of the PI 3-phosphatase, PTEN, in Dictyostelium discoideum dramatically prolonged and broadened the PH domain relocation and actin polymerization responses, causing the cells lacking PTEN to follow a circuitous route toward the attractant. Exogenously expressed PTEN-GFP localized to the surface membrane at the rear of the cell. Membrane localization required a putative PI(4,5)P2 binding motif and was required for chemotaxis. These results suggest that specific phosphoinositides direct actin polymerization to the cell's leading edge and regulation of PTEN through a feedback loop plays a critical role in gradient sensing and directional migration.     

Sensory adaptation of Dictyostelium discoideum cells to chemotactic signals

Postvegetative Dictyostelium discoideum cells react chemotactically to gradients of cAMP, folic acid, and pterin. In the presence of a constant concentration of 10(-5) M cAMP cells move at random. They still are able to respond to superimposed gradients of cAMP, although the response is less efficient than without the high background level of cAMP. Cells which are accommodated to 10(-5) M cAMP do not react to a gradient of cAMP if the mean cAMP concentration is decreasing with time. This indicates the involvement of adaptation in the detection of chemotactic gradients: cells adapt to the mean concentration of chemoattractant and respond to positive deviations from the mean concentration. Cells adapted to high cAMP concentrations react normally to gradients of folic acid or pterin. Adaptation to one of these compounds does not affect the response to the other attractants. This suggests that cAMP, folic acid, and pterin are detected by different receptors, and that adaptation is localized at a step in the transduction process before the signals from these receptors coincide into one pathway. I discuss the implications of adaptation for chemotaxis and cell aggregation.     

Directional sensing during chemotaxis

Cells have the innate ability to sense and move towards a variety of chemoattractants. We investigate the pathways by which cells sense and respond to chemoattractant gradients. We focus on the model system Dictyostelium and compare our understanding of chemotaxis in this system with recent advances made using neutrophils and other mammalian cell types, which share many molecular components and signaling pathways with Dictyostelium. This review also examines models that have been proposed to explain how cells are able to respond to small differences in ligand concentrations between the anterior leading edge and posterior of the cell. In addition, we highlight the overlapping functions of many signaling components in diverse processes beyond chemotaxis, including random cell motility and cell division.     

Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate induces cyclic GMP formation in Dictyostelium discoideum

Chemotactic signalling in the cellular slime mould Dictyostelium discoideum employs signalling molecules such as folate and cyclic AMP. These bind to specific cell surface receptors and rapidly trigger internal responses that induce chemotactic movement of the amoebae. Previous studies have shown that actin is polymerised within 3-5 sec of cyclic AMP or folate binding and that a peak of cyclic GMP is formed within 9-12 sec. Release of Ca2+ from intracellular stores has been implicated as a secondary messenger. Here we present evidence that D-myo-inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate, when added to permeabilized amoebae of Dictyostelium, can mimic the action of chemoattractants on normal intact amoebae in inducing cyclic GMP formation. Our data suggest that IP3, which is known to act as an intermediary messenger between cell surface hormone receptors and release of Ca2+ from internal stores in mammalian cells, functions in a similar capacity during chemotaxis of this primitive eukaryote.     

Coronin, an actin binding protein of Dictyostelium discoideum localized to cell surface projections, has sequence similarities to G protein beta subunits.

A soluble actin binding protein of Dictyostelium discoideum cells has been extracted and purified from precipitated actin-myosin complexes. This protein with a relative molecular mass of 55 kDa has been named coronin because of its association with crown-shaped cell surface projections of growth-phase D. discoideum cells. In aggregating cells, which respond most sensitively to the chemoattractant cyclic AMP, coronin is accumulated at the front where surface projections are directed towards a cAMP source. Since these cells can quickly change shape and polarity, it follows that coronin is rapidly reshuffled within the cells during motion and chemotactic orientation. The cDNA derived sequence of coronin indicates a protein of 49 kDa, consisting of an amino-terminal domain with similarities to the beta subunits of G proteins and a carboxy-terminal domain with a high tendency for alpha-helical structure. It is hypothesized that coronin is implicated in the transmission of chemotactic signals from cAMP receptors in the plasma membrane through G proteins to the cortical cytoskeleton, whose structure and activity is locally modulated.     

Chemotaxis: a feedback-based computational model robustly predicts multiple aspects of real cell behaviour

The mechanism of eukaryotic chemotaxis remains unclear despite intensive study. The most frequently described mechanism acts through attractants causing actin polymerization, in turn leading to pseudopod formation and cell movement. We recently proposed an alternative mechanism, supported by several lines of data, in which pseudopods are made by a self-generated cycle. If chemoattractants are present, they modulate the cycle rather than directly causing actin polymerization. The aim of this work is to test the explanatory and predictive powers of such pseudopod-based models to predict the complex behaviour of cells in chemotaxis. We have now tested the effectiveness of this mechanism using a computational model of cell movement and chemotaxis based on pseudopod autocatalysis. The model reproduces a surprisingly wide range of existing data about cell movement and chemotaxis. It simulates cell polarization and persistence without stimuli and selection of accurate pseudopods when chemoattractant gradients are present. It predicts both bias of pseudopod position in low chemoattractant gradients and--unexpectedly--lateral pseudopod initiation in high gradients. To test the predictive ability of the model, we looked for untested and novel predictions. One prediction from the model is that the angle between successive pseudopods at the front of the cell will increase in proportion to the difference between the cell's direction and the direction of the gradient. We measured the angles between pseudopods in chemotaxing Dictyostelium cells under different conditions and found the results agreed with the model extremely well. Our model and data together suggest that in rapidly moving cells like Dictyostelium and neutrophils an intrinsic pseudopod cycle lies at the heart of cell motility. This implies that the mechanism behind chemotaxis relies on modification of intrinsic pseudopod behaviour, more than generation of new pseudopods or actin polymerization by chemoattractants.     

Actin polymerization and pseudopod extension during amoeboid chemotaxis

Amoebae of the cellular slime mold Dictyostelium discoideum are an excellent model system for the study of amoeboid chemotaxis. These cells can be studied as a homogeneous population whose response to chemotactic stimulation is sufficiently synchronous to permit the correlation of the changes in cell shape and biochemical events during chemotaxis. Having demonstrated this synchrony of response, we show that actin polymerization occurs in two stages during stimulation with chemoattractants. The assembly of F-actin that peaks between 40 and 60 sec after the onset of stimulation is temporally correlated with the growth of new pseudopods. F-actin, which is assembled by 60 sec after stimulation begins, is localized in the new pseudopods that are extended at this time. Both stages of actin polymerization during chemotactic stimulation involve polymerization at the barbed ends of actin filaments based on the cytochalasin sensitivity of this response. We present a hypothesis in which actin polymerization is one of the major driving forces for pseudopod extension during chemotaxis. The predictions of this model, that localized regulation of actin nucleation activity and actin filament cross-linking must occur, are discussed in the context of current models for signal transduction and of recent information regarding the types of actin-binding proteins that are present in the cell cortex.     

Actin polymerization in response to different chemoattractants is reduced in granulocytes from chronic myeloid leukemia patients

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), a hematopoietic stem cell disorder, is characterized by the presence of Philadelphia chromosome (Ph1). Earlier studies have shown that various functions, such as chemotaxis, fluid phase pinocytosis, phagocytosis, and degranulation in response to chemotactic peptide formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine (fMLP), were defective in polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNL) from CML patients. These functions depend on actin microfilaments (MF). Further studies showed that fMLP-induced actin polymerization was lower in CML PMNL. To see if this defect is specific to stimulation by fMLP alone or is a global phenomenon involving other chemoattractant receptors, chemotaxis and actin polymerization were studied in response to fMLP, an analog of fMLP, formyl-methionine-1 aminocyclooctane 1 carboxylic acid-phenyalanine-O-methionine (FACC8), platelet-activating factor (PAF), and leukotriene B4 (LTB4). These compounds bind to different chemoattractant receptors. Chemotaxis and actin polymerization in response to all four chemoattractants were significantly lower in CML PMNL compared with PMNL from normal subjects and were differentially affected for the different chemoattractants. These results suggest a global phenomenon involving all four chemoattractant-stimulated pathways. This lower amount of F-actin may be responsible for the defective chemotaxis seen in these cells.     

Transduction of the chemotactic signal to the actin cytoskeleton of Dictyostelium discoideum

Dictyostelium discoideum amebae chemotax toward folate during vegetative growth and toward extracellular cAMP during the aggregation phase that follows starvation. Stimulation of starving amebae with extracellular cAMP leads to both actin polymerization and pseudopod extension (Hall et al., 1988, J. Cell. Biochem. 37, 285-299). We have identified an actin nucleation activity (NA) from starving amebae that is regulated by cAMP receptors and controls actin polymerization (Hall et al., 1989, J. Cell Biol., in press). We show here that NA from vegetative cells is also regulated by chemotactic receptors for folate. Our studies indicate that NA is an essential effector in control of the actin cytoskeleton by chemotactic receptors. Guided by a recently proposed model for signal transduction from the cAMP receptor (Snaar-Jagalska et al., 1988, Dev. Genet. 9, 215-225), we investigated which of three signaling pathways activates the NA effector. Treatment of whole cells with a commercial pertussis toxin preparation (PT) inhibited cAMP-stimulated NA. However, endotoxin contamination of the PT appears to account for this effect. The synag7 mutation and caffeine treatment do not inhibit activation of NA by cAMP. Thus, neither activation of adenylate cyclase nor a G protein sensitive to PT treatment of whole cells is necessary for the NA response. Actin nucleation activity stimulated with folate is normal in vegetative fgdA cells. However, cAMP suppresses rather than activates NA in starving fgdA cells. This indicates that the components of the actin nucleation effector are present and that a pathway regulating the inhibitor(s) of nucleation remains functional in starving fgdA cells. The locus of the fgdA defect, a G protein implicated in phospholipase C activation, is directly or indirectly responsible for transduction of the stimulatory chemotactic signal from cAMP receptors to the nucleation effector in Dictyostelium.     

Ca(2+) signalling is not required for chemotaxis in Dictyostelium

Dictyostelium cells can move rapidly towards a source of cyclic-AMP (cAMP). This chemoattractant is detected by G-protein-linked receptors, which trigger a signalling cascade including a rapid influx of Ca(2+). We have disrupted an inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (InsP(3)) receptor-like gene, iplA, to produce null cells in which Ca(2+) entry in response to chemoattractants is abolished, as is the normal increase in free cytosolic Ca(2+) ([Ca(2+)](c)) that follows chemotactic stimulation. However, the resting [Ca(2+)](c) is similar to wild type. This mutant provides a test for the role of Ca(2+) influx in both chemotaxis and the signalling cascade that controls it. The production of cyclic-GMP and cAMP, and the activation of the MAP kinase, DdERK2, triggered from the cAMP receptor, are little perturbed in the mutant; mobilization of actin into the cytoskeleton also follows similar kinetics to wild type. Mutant cells chemotax efficiently towards cAMP or folic acid and their sensitivity to cAMP is similar to wild type. Finally, they move at similar speeds to wild-type cells, with or without chemoattractant. We conclude that Ca(2+) signalling is not necessary for chemotaxis to cAMP.     

Neutrophil chemoattractant receptors and the membrane skeleton

Signal transduction via receptors for N-formylmethionyl peptide chemoattractants (FPR) on human neutrophils is a highly regulated process which involves participation of cytoskeletal elements. Evidence exists suggesting that the cytoskeleton and/or the membrane skeleton controls the distribution of FPR in the plane of the plasma membrane, thus controlling the accessibility of FPR to different proteins in functionally distinct domains. In desensitized cells, FPR are restricted to domains which are depleted of G proteins but enriched in cytoskeletal proteins such as actin and fodrin. Thus, the G protein signal transduction partners of FPR become inaccessible to the agonist-occupied receptor, preventing cell activation. The mechanism of interaction of FPR with the membrane skeleton is poorly understood but evidence is accumulating that suggests a direct binding of FPR (and other receptors) to cytoskeletal proteins such as actin.     

Initiation of multicellular differentiation in Dictyostelium discoideum is regulated by coronin A

Many biological systems respond to environmental changes by activating intracellular signaling cascades, resulting in an appropriate response. One such system is represented by the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum. When food sources become scarce, these unicellular cells can initiate a cAMP-driven multicellular aggregation program to ensure long-term survival. On starvation, the cells secrete conditioned medium factors that initiate cAMP signal transduction by inducing expression of genes such as cAMP receptors and adenylate cyclase. The mechanisms involved in the activation of the first pulses of cAMP release have been unclear. We here show a crucial role for the evolutionarily conserved protein coronin A in the initiation of the cAMP response. On starvation, coronin A–deficient cells failed to up-regulate the expression of cAMP-regulated genes, thereby failing to initiate development, despite a normal prestarvation response. Of importance, external addition of cAMP to coronin A–deficient cells resulted in normal chemotaxis and aggregate formation, thereby restoring the developmental program and suggesting a functional cAMP relay in the absence of coronin A. These results suggest that coronin A is dispensable for cAMP sensing, chemotaxis, and development per se but is part of a signal transduction cascade essential for system initiation leading to multicellular development in Dictyostelium.