Recent Studies on Invasive Fungal Diseases in Children and Adolescents: an Update

The improved survival of fragile pediatric hosts such as those afflicted with primary or acquired immune deficiencies, prematurity, and surgical pathology – mainly gastrointestinal and trauma – has resulted in an increased number of children susceptible to invasive fungal infections. These infections are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Newer, safer antifungal agents allow for preventive and empiric strategies in the management of patients at risk, such as premature infants, patients receiving chemotherapy, and bone marrow or solid-organ transplant recipients. Improved radiological and molecular techniques result in earlier diagnosis of fungal infections, allowing for preemptive therapy in these patients, minimizing exposure to antifungal agents and the risk of emergence of resistant fungal strains. A better understanding of the differences in pharmacokinetics between children and adults will allow for better utilization of existing antifungal agents and improved outcomes.     

Pediatric pharmacology of antifungal agents

Pediatric age groups display important differences in host biology, predisposing conditions, epidemiology, and presentation of fungal infections relative to the adult population. Over the past decade, major advances have been made in the field of medical mycology. Most importantly, an array of new antifungal agents has entered the clinical arena. Although pediatric approval of several of these agents remains to be established, the pediatric development of antifungal agents is moving forward. Invasive fungal infections will remain important causes for morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised pediatric patients. Although the availability of new therapeutic options is an important advance, antifungal therapy has become increasingly complex, and a thorough understanding of the available antifungal armamentarium is essential for the successful management of individual patients.     

Primary and Secondary Antifungal Prophylaxis in the Immunocompromised Child: Where do we Stand?

Invasive opportunistic fungal infections are important causes of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised children undergoing chemotherapy or haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Primary and secondary chemoprophylaxis of invasive fungal infections targets high risk disease-related patients with acute myeloid leukaemia, high risk acute lymphoblastic leukaemias, recurrent leukaemias and those following allogeneic HSCT. The rationale for antifungal prophylaxis in high risk patients comes from two different aspects. On the one hand, is the difficulty of instant diagnosis and, on the other hand, the consequences of morbidity and mortality by invasive infectious diseases. Although we have limited pediatric data concerning antifungal prophylaxis, it has become part of infectious disease supportive care schemes in most of paediatric leukaemia and HSCT centres. This review has insights on the evidence concerning primary and secondary antifungal prophylaxis in immunocompromised children. Although our knowledge comes from large adult studies concerning antifungal agents, there is a great need for evidence of primary or secondary antifungal prophylaxis in large pediatric clinical trials in order to have a consensus in primary and secondary antifungal prophylaxis in immunocompromised children.     

Antifungal Prophylaxis in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

Invasive fungal infections in children have shown a dramatic increase over the last two decades. Their importance and clinical implications are more prominent in selected groups of patients such as critically ill children in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). This population constitutes an important target for prophylactic antifungal interventions. While antifungal agents have been studied in various clinical settings, knowledge in this particular setting is rather scant. The current data suggest that antifungal prophylaxis in the PICU setting should be tailored to the needs of each patient guided by the individual’s risk factors and local epidemiology.

     

Rare Fungal Infections in Children: An Updated Review of the Literature

An increasing trend of reports of rare fungal diseases has been observed to be mainly associated with the substantial increase of high-risk immunocompromised children, as well as with the selective pressure of antifungal drugs. On the other hand, recent reports have shown that several species of these rare fungi may also cause infections in immunocompetent children without obvious underlying conditions. The clinical spectrum of these infections, and most importantly their outcome, varies greatly, implying for a rather heterogenic group of pediatric infections. Various types of superficial and subcutaneous fungal infections, as well as systemic and disseminated life-threatening infections, have been reported. Prompt diagnosis and appropriate treatment of rare fungal diseases in children remains a great challenge. Several treatment options have been used, ranging from localized to combination treatment with extensive surgical excision and long-term antifungal therapy. We review contemporary data of rare fungal infections in pediatric patients focusing on epidemiology, mycology, management and outcome, published during the last three years.     

An update on the pharmacoeconomics of antifungal pharmacotherapy

The incidence and severity of invasive fungal infections are on the rise and they pose a risk of significant morbidity and mortality. The cost burden of fungal infections in the United States is high. There are many newer, less toxic antifungal agents to manage these challenging infections; however, these agents also carry a high cost of their own. When considering an antifungal agent for a specific patient, it is important to consider safety, efficacy, and cost, thus making it essential to continually evaluate the antifungal pharmacoeconomic literature to assist in the therapeutic decision-making process for patients with invasive fungal infections. Unfortunately, there is a lack of pharmacoeconomic studies addressing the costs associated with the treatment and prevention of fungal infections. Future large-scale clinical studies should include pharmacoeconomic analyses and end points that encompass all costs associated with antifungal drug use, not solely drug acquisition costs.     

Systemic fungal infections: A pharmacist/researcher perspective

Systemic fungal infections are increasing in prevalence, especially in immunocompromised patients and post-surgical patients. The rise in systemic fungal infections has resulted in increased utilization of antifungal agents which, in turn, has contributed to escalating resistance rates as seen by the increasing number of fungal pathogens added to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Antimicrobial Resistance Threats Report in 2019. Unfortunately, there are few novel antifungal agents coming to market to combat these ever-increasing resistance rates. In this review, we cover the current climate of antifungal agents and explore agents coming through the pipeline and potentially to market. We also discuss the indicated uses for empiric and targeted antifungal therapies as well as the need to include antifungal agents as a part of antimicrobial stewardship programs that focus heavily on antibacterial agents.     

Systemic antifungals. Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics

Invasive fungal infections are important causes of morbidity and mortality in critically ill non neutropenic patients. For many years, amphotericin B and flucytosine have been the only available antifungal agents for invasive fungal infections. Fortunately, the antifungal armamentarium has increased during the past two decades with the addition of several new agents. In addition to itraconazole and fluconazole, lipid formulations of amphotericin B, voriconazole, and caspofungin have been recently licensed. These various antifungal agents differ in their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile.     

AmBisome,tres retos: infección por Candida auris,infección del sistema nervioso central e infección asociada a biopelículas

The treatment of invasive fungal infections remains a challenge, both for the diagnosis and for the need of providing the appropriate antifungal therapy. Candida auris is a pathogenic yeast that is responsible for hospital outbreaks, especially in intensive care units; it is characterized by a high resistance to the antifungal agents and can become multidrug-resistant. At present, the recommended antifungal agents for the invasive infections with this pathogen are echinocandins, always after carrying out an antifungal susceptibility testing. In case of no clinical response or persistent candidemia, the addition of liposomal amphotericin B or isavuconazole may be considered. Both fungal infection of the central nervous system and that associated with biomedical devices remain rare entities affecting mainly immunocompromised patients. However, an increase in their incidence in recent years, along with high morbidity and mortality, has been shown. The treatment of these infections is conditioned by the limited knowledge of the pharmacokinetic properties of antifungals. A better understanding of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters of the different antifungals is essential to determine the efficacy of the antifungal agents in the treatment of these infections.     

Pros and Cons of Extrapolating Animal Data on Antifungal Pharmacodynamics to Humans

Both the incidence of invasive fungal infections and the number of antifungal agents available to clinicians have expanded significantly over the past two decades. Successes with pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluations of other antimicrobial agents in animal models and their clinical correlations with patient outcomes have led to an increased number of studies evaluating both old and new antifungal agents. Recently, animal models have successfully defined target pharmacodynamic indices for many antifungal agents and fungal infections, but validation of these targets in human studies is frequently lacking. This article evaluates the potential pros and cons of extrapolating to humans the animal data on antifungal pharmacodynamics.     

Pharmacokinetics,Safety and Efficacy of Voriconazole in Pediatric Patients: An Update

Opportunistic invasive fungal infections are important infectious complications in severely immunocompromised children with hematological malignancies and/or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and are causes of considerable morbidity and mortality. Voriconazole is a broad-spectrum, second generation antifungal triazole with activity against yeast and filamentous fungi and first line indications against invasive aspergillosis and invasive candidiasis. While the compound has been approved in children and adolescents for several years, the dose finding in this population is ongoing and data on safety and efficacy continue to be accrued. The purpose of this article is to provide an update on the pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy of voriconazole in pediatric patients.     

Harnessing calcineurin as a novel anti-infective agent against invasive fungal infections

The number of immunocompromised patients with invasive fungal infections continues to increase and new antifungal therapies are not keeping pace with the growing incidence of these infections and their associated mortality. Calcineurin inhibition is currently used to exert effective immunosuppression following organ transplantation and in treating various other conditions. However, the calcineurin pathway is also intricately involved in the growth and pathogenesis of the three major fungal pathogens of humans, Cryptococcus neoformans, Candida albicans and Aspergillus fumigatus, and the exploitation of fungal calcineurin pathways holds great promise for the future development of novel antifungal agents. This Review summarizes our current understanding of calcineurin biology in these fungal species, and its exciting potential role in treating invasive fungal infections.     

Antifungal Distribution Into Cerebrospinal Fluid,Vitreous Humor,Bone, and Other Difficult Sites

The incidence of invasive fungal infections continues to increase, especially in patients with immune dysfunction. Fungal infections are often difficult to treat, requiring therapy for weeks or months to eradicate infection. Although fungal infections of the central nervous system, eye, and bones occur less frequently than infections at other sites, it is necessary to assess the utility of the currently available antifungal agents in treating these infections. Unfortunately, information regarding drug distribution to these sites is often scarce and limited to a few animal studies or case reports. This review summarizes information about commonly used antifungal agents and their penetration into the central nervous system, eye, and bone.     

Invasive fungal infections in critically ill patients: different therapeutic options and a uniform strategy

The high morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs associated with the invasive fungal infections, especially in the critical care setting, is of importance since the prophylactic, empiric, and pre-emptive therapy interventions, based on early identification of risk factors, is of common occurrence. In the last years alone there have been important developments in antifungal pharmacotherapy. Evidence-based studies using new antifungal agents are now emerging as important players in the pharmacotherapy of invasive fungal infections in seriously ill and difficult patients. However, data on critically ill patients are more limited and usually recovered from general studies. This study shows the benefits obtained by the new antifungal agents on different clinical situations in critical care units. The increasing number of non-C. albicans species and the high mortality rates in these settings suggest that the application of early de-escalation therapy in critically ill patients with fungal infection should be mandatory. The possibility of using antifungal combination therapy in these types of patients should be considered.     

Antifungals: mechanism of action and resistance, established and novel drugs

Serious fungal infections, caused mostly by opportunistic species, are increasingly common in immunocompromised and other vulnerable patients. The use of antifungal drugs, primarily azoles and polyenes, has increased in parallel. Yet, established agents do not satisfy the medical need completely: azoles are fungistatic and vulnerable to resistance, whereas polyenes cause serious host toxicity. Drugs in clinical development include echinocandins, pneumocandins, and improved azoles. Promising novel agents in preclinical development include several inhibitors of fungal protein, lipid and cell wall syntheses. Recent advances in fungal genomics, combinatorial chemistry, and high-throughput screening may accelerate the antifungal discovery process.     

Aerosolized Delivery of Antifungal Agents

Pulmonary infections caused by Aspergillus species are associated with significant morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients. Although the treatment of pulmonary fungal infections requires the use of systemic agents, aerosolized delivery is an attractive option in prevention because the drug can concentrate locally at the site of infection with minimal systemic exposure. Current clinical evidence for the use of aerosolized delivery in preventing fungal infections is limited to amphotericin B products, although itraconazole, voriconazole, and caspofungin are under investigation. Based on conflicting results from clinical trials that evaluated various amphotericin B formulations, the routine use of aerosolized delivery cannot be recommended. Further research with well-designed clinical trials is necessary to elucidate the therapeutic role and risks associated with aerosolized delivery of antifungal agents. This article provides an overview of aerosolized delivery systems, the intrapulmonary pharmacokinetic properties of aerosolized antifungal agents, and key findings from clinical studies.     

Evaluation of fungaemia infections in a Hungarian university hospital between 1996 and 2009

The incidence of Candida species causing bloodstream infections in the University Hospital of Szeged, Hungary, between 1996 and 2009, and the susceptibilities of these isolates to antifungal agents were evaluated.Automated blood culture systems (Vital, bioMérieux, Marcy-l'Etoile, France; and BACTEC 9120, Becton-Dickinson Diagnostic Systems, Sparks, USA) were used. The in vitro susceptibilities of the yeast isolates to antifungal agents were determined by the Etest method (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden).Bloodstream infections were caused by yeast strains in 231 cases during this period, and 226 Candida strains were cultured from 216 candidaemia patients. Bloodstream infections caused by multiple Candida spp. were diagnosed almost every year. Of the 216 patients, 67 were children; and 55 infants needed intensive care. In 2005, C. glabrata caused an increase in the incidence of invasive fungal infections in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. The PFGE analysis of 12 isolates distinguished 4 different karyotypes. The incidence of bloodstream infections caused by fungi did not change during the 14-year study period. The most frequent species cultured from blood samples were C. albicans and C. glabrata. The incidence of resistant isolates remained constant. The local trends of fungaemia must be monitored and compared with global reports.     

Antifungal activity of nontraditional antifungal agents

Invasive fungal infections are becoming increasingly important in the management of critically ill and immunocompromised patients. As organ and stem cell transplantation becomes more prominent and immune therapies are employed for diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and plaque psoriasis, the population of patients at risk continues to grow. Many invasive fungal infections are associated with extremely high mortality rates. Antifungal options are limited and novel therapies are intriguing as we attempt to improve patient outcomes and preserve the antifungal armamentarium. Many other classes of pharmaceuticals typically seen as non-antifungal do in fact have significant antifungal activity. Prominent among these are calcineurin inhibitors, antiarrhythmics, antidepressants, antibacterials, and others. Some have activity alone and some augment the activity of conventional antifungals. Unfortunately, clinical data are lacking for most of these agents and their role in therapy remains undefined. This review focuses on several representative non-antifungal agents with antifungal activity.     

Pharmacology, in vitro activity, and in vivo efficacy of new antifungal agents

Invasive fungal infections remain significant clinical challenges and are associated with high morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients. Despite the availability of new antifungal agents, response rates against many of these infections remain suboptimal. In addition, many of the clinically available agents have limited oral bioavailability, are associated with adverse effects due to similarities between fungal and mammalian cells, or have significant drug-drug interactions. For these reasons, there is great interest in developing new antifungal drugs, including those with novel mechanisms of action. This article reviews the pharmacology, in vitro activity, and in vivo effectiveness of new antifungal agents, including members of new classes with novel mechanisms of action and at various stages of preclinical and clinical development. These agents include the triazole isavuconazole, the echinocandin aminocandin, the histone deacetylase inhibitor MGCD290, and the sordarin derivative FR290581.