Community Endocrine Surgical Experience With False-Negative Afirma Gec® Results: 2011–2017

Objective: Afirma Gene Expression Classifier® (Afirma GEC) molecular analysis (Veracyte, Inc, San Francisco, CA) is a negative predictive value test developed to reduce the number of thyroidectomies in thyroid nodule patients with indeterminate cytology. GEC technology has reportedly reduced unnecessary thyroid surgery, but few studies have examined Afirma GEC false-negative rates, since usually patients with GEC benign nodules do not undergo surgery for definitive diagnosis. Occasionally, Afirma GEC benign patients require removal of their thyroid nodules for other reasons; this work describes the incidence of malignancy and noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasms with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP) in this population.Methods: We reviewed our community endocrine surgical practice database for patients who had undergone thyroid surgery from January 2011 through April 2017 despite benign Afirma GEC results.Results: Afirma GEC testing was completed for 475 patients during the study period. Surgery was clinically indicated for other reasons in 42 of the 193 patients (22%) with Afirma GEC benign results. Malignancy or NIFTP in the targeted nodule was found in the final histologic evaluation of 14 of the 42 Afirma GEC benign surgical patients. The Afirma GEC false-negative percentage for our incomplete surgical group (FNP-ISG), defined as the surgically proven false negatives divided by the total Afirma GEC benign patients, was 7.3%.Conclusion: Our high surgical rate in Afirma GEC benign nodules reveals an FNP-ISG of 7.3% in our community endocrine surgical patient population; this value exceeds the 5.7% reported in the multicenter 2012 Afirma GEC validation study.Abbreviations: Afirma GEC = Afirma Gene Expression Classifier; FNA = fine-needle aspiration; FNP = false-negative percentage; FNP-ISG = false-negative percentage for an incomplete surgical group; NIFTP = noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasms with papillary-like nuclear features     

Using the Ata and Acr Ti-Rads Sonographic Classifications as Adjunctive Predictors of Malignancy for Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules

Objective: Thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology pose management challenges in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of ultrasound features in navigating clinical decision making in thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed ultrasound imaging from 186 adult patients with thyroid nodules and indeterminate cytology who underwent thyroidectomy at a quaternary hospital from 2010–2017. All nodules were classified based on the American Thyroid Association (ATA) and 2017 American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS). Nodules were included if good quality pre-operative ultrasound imaging and surgical pathology were available.Results: A total of 202 thyroid nodules were included. The median age was 57 years; 82.8% were female. Risk of malignancy (ROM) in resected nodules with Bethesda 3 and 4 cytology was 19.4% and 30.3%, respectively. ATA high-suspicious and TI-RADS 5 nodules had high ROM, 100% in both systems for Bethesda 3 nodules; 66.7% and 50.0%, respectively, for Bethesda 4 nodules. For ATA very-low suspicious/TI-RADS 1 and 2, ROM was 0%. ROM in ATA low-suspicious/TI-RADS 3 nodules with Bethesda 3 cytology was lower (15.2% and 16.0%, respectively) than Bethesda 4 cytology (33.8% and 34.3%, respectively). ATA intermediate-suspicious/TI-RADS 4 nodules with Bethesda 4 cytology had a lower ROM (11.1% and 18.2%, respectively) than Bethesda 3 cytology (28.6 % and 31.6%, respectively).Conclusion: Using either the ATA or the TI-RADS system to risk-stratify nodules with indeterminate cytology may help clinicians plan better for additional diagnostic testing and treatment.Abbreviations: ACR = American College of Radiology; ATA = American Thyroid Association; AUS = atypia of undetermined significance; FLUS = follicular lesion of undetermined significance; FN = follicular neoplasm; PPV = positive predictive value; ROM = risk of malignancy; SFN = suspicious for follicular neoplasm; TI-RADS = Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System     

Clinical Impact of Non-Invasive Follicular Thyroid Neoplasm with Papillary-Like Nuclear Features on the Risk of Malignancy in the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology: A Meta-Analysis of 14,153 Resected Thyroid Nodules

Objective: It is still controversial as to how the reclassification of noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP) affects the risk of malignancy (ROM) in The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC). This meta-analysis was aimed to investigate the impact of NIFTP on the ROM in each TBSRTC category.Methods: We accessed three electronic databases including PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus to search for relevant data from January, 2016 to July, 2018. Relative risk and meta-analysis of proportions using the DerSimonian-Laird method, and each corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) was pooled using a random-effect model.Results: A total of 14 studies consisting of 14,153 resected nodules were included for meta-analyses. Overall, there was a significant reduction in ROM in all TBSRTC categories following the NIFTP reclassification, except TBSRTC category I. The largest absolute and relative decrease in ROM was observed in TBSRTC category V (16%; 95% CI = 8 to 24) and category III (32%; 95% CI = 24 to 39), respectively. There was a positive correlation between the rate of NIFTP and resection rate (r = 0.83; P = .02). The decreases in ROM were more prominent in Western than in Asian cohorts.Conclusion: We confirmed the decrease in ROM due to the NIFTP reclassification for most of TBSRTC categories, which was more significant in Western than in Asian practice. The incidence of NIFTP was higher in institutions where surgical resection rates were high in patients with indeterminate cytology nodules.Abbreviations: AUS/FLUS = atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance; CI = confidence interval; FNA = fine-needle aspiration; FN/SFN = follicular neoplasm/suspicious for follicular neoplasm; NIFTP = noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features; NI-FVPTC = noninvasive follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma; ROM = risk of malignancy; RR = relative risk; SM = suspicious for malignancy; TBSRTC = The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology     

Surgical Utility of Afirma: Effects of High Cancer Prevalence and Oncocytic Cell Types in Patients with Indeterminate Thyroid Cytology

ObjectiveThe Afirma Gene Expression Classifier (GEC) molecular marker assay was developed for the purpose of improving surgical decision-making with indeterminate fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsies of thyroid nodules. In this paper, we analyze the performance of the GEC over 27 months in a community hospital-based thyroid surgery practice.MethodsWe began using GEC and Thyroid Cytopathology Partners (TCP) exclusively for thyroid FNA analysis in January 2011, shortly after the Afirma GEC became commercially available. In this paper, we focus on patients with indeterminate FNA results and the outcomes of GEC analysis, with particular attention paid to the calculation of the negative predictive value (NPV) of the Afirma test.ResultsWe performed 645 FNAs in 519 patients over 27 months. Overall, 58 FNAs (9%) were read as indeterminate, with 36 of these classified as suspicious by GEC (62%), 20 characterized as GEC benign (34%), and 2 determined to be inadequate due to low mRNA content. Of the 36 suspicious GEC patients, 30 underwent thyroidectomy, and 21 of the 30 had malignant final pathology. Of the 20 benign GEC patients, 5 underwent thyroid surgery, and 2 were discovered to have malignancies. The NPV for the Afirma GEC in our practice environment was 89.6%.ConclusionIn a practice with a high incidence of thyroid cancer in patients with indeterminate FNAs (33% for our practice), the NPV of the Afirma GEC test may not be as robust as suggested in the existing literature. (Endocr Pract. 2014;20:364-369)     

Risk of Malignancy in Thyroid Cytology: The Impact of The Reclassification of Noninvasive Follicular Thyroid Neoplasm with Papillary-Like Nuclear Features (NIFTP)

Objective: Noninvasive encapsulated follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma (EFVPTC) was recently reclassified as noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP). We aimed to compare the risk of malignancy (ROM) of the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (BSRTC) on fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC), before and after the reclassification, in a large cohort of patients.Methods: We analyzed 5,625 consecutive FNAC samples performed in 2012–2014 and selected category III (atypia of undetermined significance [AUS]/follicular lesion of undetermined significance [FLUS]), IV (follicular neoplasm [FN]/suspicious for a follicular neoplasm [SFN]), V (suspicious for malignancy [SFM]), and VI (malignant) of the BSRTC. We reviewed the histology of operated patients and compared ROM before and after the introduction of the NIFTP category.Results: A total of 772 patients were identified and 45% underwent surgery (n = 348). There were 180 cases of AUS/FLUS (10 NIFTP), 114 cases of FN/SFN (2 NIFTP), 29 cases of SFM (3 NIFTP), and 25 cases of BSRTC VI (no NIFTP). Exclusion of NIFTP from malignant lesions resulted in a relative and absolute decrease in the ROM in AUS/FLUS (15.2% and 5.5%, respectively), FN/SFN (7.6% and 1.8%, respectively) and SFM (14.2% and 10.3%, respectively) categories. Among the NIFTP patients, 93% underwent total thyroidectomy and 20% received radioiodine.Conclusion: Reclassification of noninvasive EFVPTC as NIFTP resulted in a decrease in overall ROM, and the BSRTC categories most affected were III and V.Abbreviations: AUS = atypia of undetermined significance; BSRTC = Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology; EFVPTC = encapsulated follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma; FLUS = follicular lesion of undetermined significance; FN = follicular neoplasm; FNAC = fine-needle aspiration cytology; FVPTC = follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma; NIFTP = noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features; PTC = papillary thyroid carcinoma; ROM = risk of malignancy; SFM = suspicious for malignancy; SFN = suspicious for a follicular neoplasm     

Utility of Ultrasound Versus Gene Expression Classifier in Thyroid Nodules with Atypia of Undetermined Significance

Objective: Thyroid nodules with fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology categorized as atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) often undergo additional diagnostic analysis with the Afirma Gene Expression Classifier (GEC), which classifies these as either high probability of being benign (GEC-B) or suspicious for malignancy (GEC-S). Our goal was to assess the clinical validity and utility of GEC in the evaluation of AUS cytology and evaluate the performance of ultrasonography (USG) for predicting malignancy in this subset.Methods: We conducted a study with a retrospective cohort of patients from January 2012 to January 2014 who had FNA of thyroid nodules >1 cm in size with AUS cytology.Results: Cleveland Clinic Florida has an overall prevalence of AUS of 5%. A total of 119 cases with nodules >1 cm in size were reported as AUS. Forty-eight (40.3%) had a GEC performed after the first FNA (AUS-1), and 27 of these were GEC-S. Of those 27, 21 went for surgery and 14 (66.6%) had thyroid cancer on histopathology. The remaining 71 with AUS-1 were sent for a second FNA: 19 nodules were benign and did not undergo further evaluation, while the remaining 52 were reported as AUS for the second consecutive time (AUS-2). AUS-2 samples were sent for GEC. Of these 52 AUS-2, 38 (73.1%) were reported as GEC-S. Thirty-five went for surgery and 32 (91.4%) had confirmed malignancy on histopathology. Positive predictive value (PPV) was 91.4% for AUS-2 and 66.6% for AUS-1. Moreover, AUS-2 nodules that were hypoechoic and solid on USG showed a PPV of 92% for malignancy.Conclusion: In our practice, the diagnostic accuracy to predict malignancy with GEC for AUS-1 nodules was poor (PPV, 66.6%). The PPV of GEC testing was markedly higher at 91.4% performed after two consecutive AUS cytologies. AUS-2 nodules that were solid and hypoechoic on USG also had a high probability to be malignant (PPV, 92%). We recommend repeat FNA on AUS-1 nodules rather than proceeding directly to GEC testing. Also, we suggest that among AUS-2 nodules, surgery can be recommended when USG shows solid and hypoechoic features with GEC testing reserved for the remainder.Abbreviations:AUS = atypia of undetermined significanceFNA = fine-needle aspirationGEC = gene expression classifierGEC-B = GEC-benignGEC-S = GEC-suspicious for malignancyNPV = negative predictive valuePPV = positive predictive valueUSG = ultrasonography     

Additional Surgery for Occult Risk Factors After Lobectomy in Solitary Thyroid Nodules is Predicted by Cytopathology Classification and Tumor Size

Objective: Clinical practice for differentiated thyroid cancer is moving towards lobectomy rather than total thyroidectomy in patients at low risk of recurrence. However, recurrence risk assessment depends on post-operative findings, while the surgical decision is based on preoperative factors. We determined the preoperative predictors of occult higher-risk pathology and rates of completion thyroidectomy among surgical candidates with nonbenign thyroid nodules 10 to 40 mm and no evidence of extrathyroidal extension or metastasis on preoperative evaluation.Methods: Thyroid surgery cases at a single institution from 2005–2015 were reviewed to identify those meeting American Thyroid Association (ATA) criteria for lobectomy. ATA-based risk stratification from postoperative surgical pathology was compared to preoperative cytopathology, ultrasound, and clinical findings.Results: Of 1,995 thyroid surgeries performed for nonbenign thyroid nodules 10 to 40 mm, 349 met ATA criteria for lobectomy. Occult high-risk features such as tall cell variant, gross extrathyroidal invasion, or vascular invasion were found in 36 cases (10.7%), while intraoperative lymphadenopathy led to surgical upstaging in 13 (3.7%). Intermediate risk features such as moderate lymphadenopathy or minimal extrathyroidal extension were present in an additional 44 cases. Occult risk features were present twice as often in Bethesda class 6 cases (35%) as in lower categories (12 to 17%). In multivariable analysis, Bethesda class and nodule size, but not age, race, sex, or ultrasound features, were significant predictors of occult higher-risk pathology.Conclusion: Most solitary thyroid nodules less than 4 cm and with cytology findings including atypia of undetermined significance through suspicious for papillary thyroid cancer would be sufficiently treated by lobectomy.Abbreviations: ATA = American Thyroid Association; CND = central neck dissection; DTC = differentiated thyroid cancer; ETE = extrathyroidal extension; FNA = fine needle aspiration; FTC/HCC = follicular thyroid carcinoma/Hurthle cell carcinoma; NIFTP = noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features; OR = odds ratio; PTC = papillary thyroid cancer; US = ultrasound     

Statistical Comparison of Afirma Gsc and Afirma Gec Outcomes in a Community Endocrine Surgical Practice: Early Findings

Objective: The Veracyte Afirma Gene Expression Classifier (GEC) has been the most widely used negative predictive value molecular classifier for indeterminate cytology thyroid nodules since January 2011. To improve the specificity and further reduce unnecessary thyroid surgeries, a second-generation assay (Afirma Genetic Sequence Classifier [GSC]) was released for clinical use in August 2017. We report 11 months of clinical outcomes experience with the GSC and compare them to our 6.5-year experience with the GEC.Methods: We searched our practice registry for FNAB nodules with Afirma results from January 2011through June 2018. GEC versus GSC results were compared overall, in oncocytic and nononcocytic aspirates and by pathologic outcomes.Results: GSC identified less indeterminate cytology nodules as suspicious (38.8%; 54/139) when compared to GEC (58.4%; 281/481). There was a decrease of in the percentage of oncocytic fine-needle aspiration thyroid biopsy (FNAB) subjects classified as suspicious in the GSC group, with 86 of 104 oncocytic indeterminates (82.7%) classified as suspicious by GEC and 12 of 34 (35.3%) classified as suspicious by GSC. The surgery rate in patients with oncocytic aspirates fell from 56% in the GEC group to 31% in the GSC-evaluated group (45%). Pathology analysis demonstrated a false-negative percentage for an incomplete surgical group of 9.5% for GEC and 1.2% for GSC.Conclusion: Our GSC data suggest that the GSC further reduces surgery in indeterminate thyroid nodules by improving the specificity of Afirma technology without compromising sensitivity. A primary determinant for this change is a significant improvement in the specificity of the Afirma GSC test in oncocytic FNAB aspirates.Abbreviations: FNAB = fine-needle aspiration biopsy; GEC = Gene Expression Classifier; GSC = Genetic Sequence Classifier     

A Direct Comparison of the Ata and Ti-Rads Ultrasound Scoring Systems

Objective: This study compares the American Thyroid Association (ATA) classification system with the 2017 American College of Radiology (ACR) Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) for predicting cancer risk in thyroid nodules.Methods: This is a retrospective review of ultrasound imaging of all adult patients with thyroid nodules >5 mm who underwent thyroidectomy at a tertiary care hospital in 2016. We assessed the ability of either system to predict malignancy based on surgical histopathology. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive values (NPV) and positive predictive values (PPV), and area-under-the-curve (AUC) were calculated and compared using McNemar's, Fisher exact, or DeLong's tests.Results: Three hundred and twenty-three nodules from 213 adults were included. Median patient age was 55 years; 75.6% were female. 27.2% nodules were malignant. Both ATA and ACR TI-RADS provide effective diagnostic performance, a sensitivity of 77.3% versus 78.4%, respectively, a specificity of 76.6% versus 73.2%, respectively, a PPV of 55.3% versus 52.3%, respectively, and a NPV of 90% for both. The level of agreement between the two classification systems was almost perfect (weighted Kappa statistic = 0.93, AUC 0.77 ATA versus 0.76 TI-RADS &lsqb;P = .18]). However, of the 40 (TI-RADS level 3) TR3 nodules (<2.5 cm), 10% were malignant, and of the 31 (TI-RADS level 4) TR4 nodules (<1.5 cm), 38% were malignant.Conclusion: The ATA and TI-RADS classification systems appear to have similar diagnostic value for predicting thyroid cancer. However, subanalysis of TR3 and TR4 nodules with consideration of size criteria showed that there is a higher risk of missing a malignancy if the ACR TI-RADS recommendation is followed. These results should be validated in a different patient cohort with a lower incidence of cancer.Abbreviations: ACR = American College of Radiology; ATA = American Thyroid Association; FNA = Fine Needle Aspiration; κ = weighted Kappa statistic; NPV = negative predictive values; PPV = positive predictive values; TI-RADS = Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System; TR1 = TI-RADS level 1; TR2 = TI-RADS level 2; TR3 = TI-RADS level 3; TR4 = TI-RADS level 4; TR5 = TI-RADS level 5     

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of the American Thyroid Association Guidelines and American College of Radiology TI-RADS

ObjectiveTo evaluate the 2015 American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines and 2017 American College of Radiology (ACR) Thyroid Imaging, Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) for their efficacy in predicting malignant thyroid nodules and safety in recommending fine needle aspiration (FNA).MethodsWe reviewed data of 970 thyroid nodules from 908 patients with core needle biopsy pathology. We calculated the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for each guideline to predict malignancies. We compared the areas under the curve and FNA recommendations between the 2 guidelines.ResultsAccording to the core needle biopsy pathology, 59.9% (581/970) of the thyroid nodules were malignant. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value was 68%, 91%, 33%, 67%, and 70%, respectively, for the ATA guidelines and 70%, 84%, 49%, 71%, and 68%, respectively, for the ACR TI-RADS. Areas under the curve (ATA: 0.71 vs ACR TI-RADS: 0.74; P = .054) were similar when predicting malignancies. For the 545 nodules with maximum diameter ≥1.0 cm, the ACR TI-RADS recommended FNA less often than the ATA guidelines (83.3% [454/545] vs 87.7% [478/545]; P = .01). For the 321 malignant nodules with maximum diameter ≥1.0 cm, the proportions of FNA recommendations were not significantly different (ACR TI-RADS: 90.7% [291/321] vs ATA: 92.5% [297/321]; P = .06).ConclusionThe 2015 ATA guidelines and 2017 ACR TI-RADS showed a similar ability in predicting malignancies. Reducing FNA recommendations by the ACR TI-RADS would not lead to a significant decrease in the FNA recommendations given for malignancies with maximum diameter ≥1.0 cm.     

Quality of Life Following Molecular Marker Testing for Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules

Objective: Thyroid cancer has a disproportionately negative effect on the quality of life (QOL) compared to malignancies with a worse prognosis. The QOL of patients with indeterminate thyroid nodules has not been previously evaluated. We aimed to assess the impact of molecular test results on the QOL of patients with indeterminate thyroid nodules.Methods: A short version of the Thyroid-Related Patient-Reported Outcome (ThyPro-39) was used to assess the QOL of patients who underwent thyroid fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy throughout UCLA Health from May, 2016, to June, 2017. All patients with indeterminate biopsy results underwent molecular testing with either Afirma Gene Expression Classifier or ThyroSeq v2 at the time of the initial biopsy. The QOL associated with symptoms of goiter, anxiety, depression, and impaired daily life were analyzed.Results: Of 825 consented patients, 366 completed the assessment (44.4% response rate). FNA results included 76% benign, 7% malignant, and 17% indeterminate. There were no differences in QOL between patients with a benign FNA and patients with an indeterminate result with benign molecular testing. In patients with an indeterminate FNA, symptoms of goiter (20.5 versus 10.4; P = .033) and depression (33.3 versus 21.0; P = .026) were worse for patients with suspicious versus benign molecular test results; however, no significant differences were observed in anxiety or impaired daily life.Conclusion: A benign molecular test result may provide reassurance for patients with indeterminate thyroid nodules that the risk of malignancy is low. Long-term follow-up is necessary to determine if benign molecular test results maintain improved QOL.     

Comparison of 5 Thyroid Ultrasound Stratification Systems for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Nodules and to Avoid Biopsy Using Histology as Reference Standard

ObjectiveWe aimed to compare the thyroid ultrasound risk stratification systems (RSSs) of the American College of Radiology (ACR) Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS), European TI-RADS, Korean TI-RADS, and American Thyroid Association (ATA), American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, American College of Endocrinology, and Associazione Medici Endocrinologi guidelines to differentiate benign from malignant thyroid nodules and to avoid unnecessary fine needle aspiration (FNA).MethodsThe records of 1143 nodules ≥1 cm that underwent FNA biopsy and thyroidectomy between 2012 and 2020 at our institution were reviewed. Ultrasound categories and FNA recommendation indications of 5 international RSSs were compared with histopathological findings as benign or malignant. The ultrasound categories and recommended FNA indications, the proportion of the avoidable FNA procedures, and false negative rates (FNRs) by different systems were compared with each other.ResultsOf the 1143 nodules, 45% had thyroid malignancy. FNA recommendation and ultrasound risk classification of ATA guidelines had the highest area under curves of 0.619, and 0.715, respectively. ACR TI-RADS, American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology/Associazione Medici Endocrinologi guidelines, European TI-RADS, ATA guidelines, and Korean TI-RADS would have avoided FNA for 34.7%, 31%, 25.7%, 20%, and 6% of nodules with an FNR of 24%, 28.5%, 22%, 7.2%, and 1.9%, respectively.ConclusionOur findings showed that all RSSs classified the nodules appropriately for malignancy. ATA guidelines had the highest area under curves and a low FNR, whereas ACR TI-RADS would have spared more patients from FNA with a high FNR.     

Comparison of Diagnostic Performance between the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System and American Thyroid Association Guidelines: A Systematic Review

Objective: We aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS) with the American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines in risk stratification of thyroid nodules.Methods: We performed a computerized search of Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar to identify eligible articles published before July 31, 2019. We included studies providing head-to-head comparison between ACR TI-RADS and ATA guidelines, with fine-needle aspiration biopsy cytology results or pathology results as the reference standard. Quality assessment of included studies was conducted using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies–2 tool. Summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity were calculated by bivariate modeling and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic modeling. We also performed multiple subgroup analyses and meta-regression.Results: Twelve original articles with 13,000 patients were included, involving a total of 14,867 thyroid nodules. The pooled sensitivity of ACR TI-RADS and ATA guidelines was 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76–0.89) and 0.89 (95% CI, 0.80–0.95), with specificity of 0.67 (95% CI, 0.56–0.76) and 0.46 (95% CI, 0.29–0.63), respectively. There were no significant differences between the two classification criteria in terms of both sensitivity (P = .26) and specificity (P = .05). For five studies providing direct comparison of ACR TI-RADS, ATA guidelines, and Korean TI-RADS, our analyses showed that the Korean TI-RADS yielded the highest sensitivity (0.89; 95% CI, 0.82–0.94), but at the cost of a significant decline in specificity (0.23; 95% CI, 0.17–0.30).Conclusion: Both classification criteria demonstrated favorable sensitivity and moderate specificity in the stratification of thyroid nodules. However, use of ACR TI-RADS could avoid a large number of biopsies at the cost of only a slight decrease in sensitivity.Abbreviations: ACR = American College of Radiology; ATA = American Thyroid Association; FNAB = fine-needle aspiration biopsy; HSROC = hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic; SROC = summary receiver operating characteristic; TI-RADS = Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System; US = ultrasonography     

Thyroseq®V2.0 Molecular Testing: A Cost-Effective Approach for the Evaluation of Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules

Objective: Approximately 15 to 30% of thyroid nodules have indeterminate cytology. Many of these nodules are treated surgically, but only 5 to 30% are malignant. Molecular testing can further narrow the risk of malignancy of these nodules. Our objective was to assess the cost effectiveness of ThyroSeq®V2.0 compared to diagnostic thyroidectomy for the evaluation of indeterminate nodules.Methods: Cytology and histopathology slides of Bethesda category III and IV (suspicious for follicular neoplasia [SFN]) nodules obtained between January 1, 2014 and November 30, 2016 were re-reviewed by 2 endocrine cytopathologists. Costs for a diagnostic approach using ThyroSeq® were calculated and compared to those of diagnostic thyroidectomy.Results: We included 8 Bethesda category III nodules that underwent ThyroSeq® and 8 that underwent diagnostic surgery. Of those submitted for ThyroSeq®, 4 were positive for mutations and underwent thyroid surgery. The average cost per nodule evaluated was $14,669 using ThyroSeq®, compared to $23,338 for diagnostic thyroid surgery. The cost per thyroid cancer case detected was $58,674 using ThyroSeq® compared to $62,233 for diagnostic thyroid surgery. We included 13 nodules Bethesda category IV that underwent ThyroSeq® and 11 that underwent diagnostic surgery. Of those submitted for ThyroSeq®, 6 were positive for mutation and underwent thyroid surgery. The average costs per nodule evaluated were $14,641 using ThyroSeq® and $24,345 using diagnostic thyroidectomy. The cost per thyroid cancer case detected was $31,721 when using ThyroSeq® compared to $53,560 for diagnostic thyroidectomy.Conclusion: The use of ThyroSeq® in our institution is cost effective compared to diagnostic thyroid surgery for the evaluation of Bethesda categories III and IV (SFN) nodules.Abbreviations: FNA = fine-needle aspiration; GEC = gene expression classifier; NIFTP = noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features; PTC = papillary thyroid cancer; SFN = suspicious for follicular neoplasia     

Pre‐operative features of non‐invasive follicular thyroid neoplasms with papillary‐like nuclear features: An analysis of their cytological,Gene Expression Classifier and sonographic findings

Objective

To investigate the corresponding cytological diagnoses, Gene Expression Classifier (GEC) results and ultrasound features of thyroid nodules diagnosed as non‐invasive follicular thyroid neoplasms with papillary‐like nuclear features (NIFTP), as well as any coexisting pathology.

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of thyroid nodules histologically diagnosed as NIFTP at our institution between 1^st April 2016 and 1^st April 2017. The following data points were collected: demographics, nodule size, ultrasound features, cytological diagnosis, GEC results, origin of sample (in‐house vs outside hospital) and any additional pathology identified in the resection specimen.

Results

The case cohort included 87 nodules diagnosed as NIFTP (size range: 1‐7 cm, mean: 2.5 cm) from 82 patients (age range: 22‐82, mean age: 50.4, M:F—1:4.1). Corresponding FNA results were available for 72 nodules (82.8%) and were categorised as follows: benign (n = 5, 6.9%), atypia of unknown significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (n = 29, 40.3%), follicular neoplasm/suspicious for follicular neoplasm/follicular neoplasm with oncocytic features (n = 27, 37.5%), suspicious for papillary thyroid carcinoma (n = 6, 8.3%) and malignant (n = 5, 6.9%). GEC results were available for 32 (44.4%) nodules, with the majority of cases classified as suspicious (81.3%). On ultrasound, most of the nodules were predominantly solid (81.8%), vascular (93.8%), non‐calcified (86.5%), and either hypoechoic (44.9%) or isoechoic (38.8%). In addition to NIFTP and other benign findings in the background thyroid, 75 separate malignant tumours were identified in 38 (46.3%) patients, many of which were papillary thyroid microcarcinomas (86.5%) with lymph node metastases present in two cases.

Conclusions

The majority of thyroid nodules histologically diagnosed as NIFTP have indeterminate cytology (77.8%) and are classified as suspicious (81.3%) by GEC testing. Taken together, these findings can guide clinicians toward a more conservative therapeutic approach.

     

Guideline Implementation on Fine-Needle Aspiration for Thyroid Nodules: Focusing on Micronodules

Objective: We investigated patients who were referred to our institution after fine-needle aspiration (FNA) was performed at outside clinics to evaluate how many nodules satisfied the FNA indications of the Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (K-TIRADS) and compare that to the number of thyroid nodules that satisfy the FNA indications of the American College of Radiology (ACR)-TIRADS and American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines.Methods: Between January 2018 and December 2018, 2,628 patients were included in our study. The included patients were those referred for thyroid surgery after having a suspicious thyroid nodule. We retrospectively applied the three guidelines to each thyroid nodule and determined whether each nodule satisfied the FNA indications. We compared the proportion of nodules satisfying the FNA indications of each guideline using a generalized linear model and generalized estimating equation.Results: The median size of the 2,628 thyroid nodules was 0.9 cm (range, 0.2 to 9.5 cm). We found that FNA was not indicated for 54.1%, 47.7%, and 19.1% of nodules and 87.3%, 99.0%, and 97.8% among them were micronodules (<1 cm) according to the ACR-TIRADS, ATA guideline, and K-TIRADS, respectively. The proportion of micronodules which satisfied the FNA indications was significantly higher for the K-TIRADS (65.1%) compared to the ACR TIRADS (12.1%) and ATA guideline (12.1%) (P<.001).Conclusion: Among patients referred for thyroid surgery to our institutions, about 35% of the micronodules underwent FNA despite not being appropriate for indications by the K-TIRADS. Systematic training for physicians as well as modifications to increase the sensitivity of the guideline may be needed to reduce the overdiagnosis of thyroid cancers, especially for micronodules.     

Implementing Key Changes in The American Thyroid Association 2015 Thyroid Nodules/Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Guidelines Across Practice Types

Objective: This article provides suggestions to help clinicians implement important changes in the 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma (“ATA 2015”) across diverse settings.Methods: Key ATA 2015 changes are summarized regarding: (1) thyroid nodule management; (2) lobectomy versus thyroidectomy for differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC); and (3) surveillance following primary treatment of DTC. Advice to facilitate implementation is based on clinical experience and selected literature.Results: Strategies are described to enhance acquisition of high-quality information that helps identify patients who may possibly avoid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of thyroid nodules or total thyroidectomy for DTC, or undergo less intense postoperative surveillance. Sonographic imaging of nodules may improve if sonograms are obtained by clinicians ordering or performing FNA or trusted high-volume sonographers. Cytopathologic assessment and reporting can be improved by working with regional or national experts. Pre-operative evaluation by endocrinologists is important so that patients are referred to experienced, proficient surgeons and assisted with well-informed decision-making regarding surgical radicality. Endocrinologists and surgeons should ensure performance of pre-operative neck ultrasonography, voice/laryngeal evaluation, and contrast-enhanced cross-sectional imaging when appropriate. Findings should be disseminated to all healthcare team members, ideally through a comprehensive medical record accessible to the entire team.Conclusion: Optimization of the sequence of specialist visits and assembly of interactive multidisciplinary teams coupled with intensified interdisciplinary and patient communication may enable clinicians to more effectively implement ATA 2015, which calls for more individualized, and often, less “invasive” management of thyroid nodules and DTC.Abbreviations: ATA 2009 = 2009 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma; ATA 2015 = 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma; DTC = differentiated thyroid carcinoma; FNA = fine-needle aspiration; PET/CT = positron emission tomography/computed tomography     

Can the American Thyroid Association,K-Tirads,and Acr-Tirads Ultrasound Classification Systems Be Used to Predict Malignancy in Bethesda Category IV Nodules?

Objective: Management of thyroid nodules with Bethesda category III and IV cytology on fine needle aspiration (FNA) is challenging as they cannot be adequately classified as benign or malignant. Ultrasound (US) patterns have demonstrated the utility in evaluating the risk of malignancy (ROM) of Bethesda category III nodules. This study aims to evaluate the value of 3 well-established US grading systems (American Thyroid Association &lsqb;ATA], Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System &lsqb;Korean-TIRADS], and The American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System &lsqb;ACR-TIRADS]) in determining ROM in Bethesda category IV nodules.Methods: Ninety-two patients with 92 surgically resected thyroid nodules who had Bethesda category IV cytology on FNA were identified. Nodule images were retrospectively graded using the 3 systems in a blinded manner. Associations between US risk category and malignant pathology for each system were analyzed.Results: Of the 92 nodules, 56 (61%) were benign and 36 (39%) were malignant. Forty-seven per cent of ATA high risk nodules, 53% of K-TIRADS category 5 nodules, and 50% of ACR-TIRADS category 5 nodules were malignant. The ATA high-risk category had 25% sensitivity, 82% specificity, 47% positive predictive value (PPV) for malignancy. K-TIRADS category 5 had 25% sensitivity, 85% specificity, 53% PPV for malignancy. ACR-TIRADS category 5 had 25% sensitivity, 84% specificity, 50% PPV for malignancy. None of the 3 grading systems yielded a statistically significant correlation between US risk category and the ROM (P = .30, .72, .28).Conclusion: The ATA, Korean-TIRADS, and ACR-TIRADS classification systems are not helpful in stratifying ROM in patients with Bethesda category IV nodules. Clinicians should be cautious of using ultra-sound alone when deciding between therapeutic options for patients with Bethesda category IV thyroid nodules.     

Consistency of Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System Reporting in Community-Based Imaging Centers Versus a Large Tertiary Hospital

ObjectiveIn our country, thyroid nodules are sonographically evaluated in health maintenance organization (HMO) imaging centers, and patients are referred to tertiary hospitals for ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy when indicated. We evaluated the concordance in Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) classification reporting between these sites.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study reviewing the sonographic features of thyroid nodules evaluated both at the HMO and a large tertiary center between January 2018 and December 2019. The primary outcome was concordance between the TI-RADS classification at both sites. Additional endpoints included correlation of TI-RADS to the Bethesda category following FNA and correlation of TI-RADS with malignancy on final pathology at each site.ResultsThe records of 336 patients with 370 nodules were reviewed. The level of concordance was poor (19.8%), with 277 (74.8%) nodules demonstrating higher TI-RADS and 20 (5.4%) lower TI-RADS at the HMO compared to the hospital (P < .001; weighted κ = 0.120). FNA results were available for 236 (63.8%) nodules. The Bethesda category strongly correlated with the hospital TI-RADS (P < .001), yet not with HMO TI-RADS (P = .123). In the surgically removed 57 nodules, a strong correlation was identified between the malignancy on final pathology and TI-RADS documented at the hospital (P < .001), yet not at the HMO (P = .259).ConclusionsThere is poor agreement between TI-RADS classification on ultrasound performed in the HMO compared to a tertiary hospital. The hospital’s TI-RADS strongly correlated with the Bethesda category and the final risk of malignancy, unlike the HMO.     

The impact of the non‐invasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary‐like nuclear feature terminology in the routine diagnosis of thyroid tumours

Background

Due to the recent proposal of the non‐invasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary‐like nuclear feature (NIFTP) category, the authors analyse the state of the art in the challenging diagnosis of follicular thyroid neoplasms in routine practice.

Methods and results

A consecutive series of 200 histological diagnoses, with complete cytological correlation, was analysed following the introduction of the NIFTP definition. The study was conducted in a general hospital with a high prevalence of thyroid benign nodules that accounted for approximately 60% of surgically‐treated nodules. The significant incidence of the new NIFTP category was 7%. Concurrently, a gradual decrease of the follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma (fvPTC) was observed (3.5%). When evaluating the FNA biopsies within the NIFTP group, despite the systematic evaluation of nuclear crowding, enlargement, irregularities and clearing, the final cytological class was often indeterminate for malignancy (Thy3/III‐IV, 71%). At histology, the application of the semiquantitative NIFTP score for the evaluation of the PTC‐like nuclear features was able to discriminate benign lesions (score 0/1) from fvPTC (score 2/3). A certain degree of overlapping still persisted between NIFTP and fvPTC (score 2) or between NIFTP and benign lesions (score 1).

Conclusions

In the routine evaluation of FNA biopsies, the presence of subtle and questionable PTC‐like nuclear features still remains a controversial aspect of the diagnostic workflow. Given that the NIFTP category was introduced to stratify the low‐risk group of thyroid tumours more precisely, pathologists should force themselves to apply the nuclear score rigorously and to classify cases assigned a score of 1 as benign proliferations.