Endo Echo Improves Primary Care Provider And Community Health Worker Self-Efficacy In Complex Diabetes Management In Medically Underserved Communities

Objective: To determine whether participation in a multidisciplinary telementorship model of healthcare delivery improves primary care provider (PCP) and community health worker (CHW) confidence in managing patients with complex diabetes in medically underserved regions.Methods: We applied a well-established healthcare delivery model, Project ECHO (Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes), to the management of complex diabetes (Endo ECHO) in medically underserved communities. A multidisciplinary team at Project ECHO connected with PCPs and CHWs at 10 health centers across New Mexico for weekly videoconferencing virtual clinics. Participating PCPs and CHWs presented de-identified patients and received best practice guidance and mentor-ship from Project ECHO specialists and network peers. A robust curriculum was developed around clinical practice guidelines and presented by weekly didactics over the ECHO network. After 2 years of participation in Endo ECHO, PCPs and CHWs completed self-efficacy surveys comparing confidence in complex diabetes management to baseline.Results: PCPs and CHWs in rural New Mexico reported significant improvement in self-efficacy in all measures of complex diabetes management, including PCP ability to serve as a local resource for other healthcare providers seeking assistance in diabetes care. Overall self-efficacy improved by 130% in CHWs (P<.0001) and by 60% in PCPs (P<.0001), with an overall large Cohen's effect size.Conclusion: Among PCPs and CHWS in rural, medically underserved communities, participation in Endo ECHO for 2 years significantly improved confidence in complex diabetes management. Application of the ECHO model to complex diabetes care may be useful in resource-poor communities with limited access to diabetes specialist services.Abbreviations: CHW = community health worker; CME = Continuing Medical Education; ECHO = Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes; FQHC = federally qualified health center; PCP = primary care provider     

Comparison Of Hba1C Goals Proposed By An Algorithm To Those Set By Different Members Of Healthcare Teams Within The Dartmouth Hitchcock Health System

Objective: An individualized approach is recommended by guidelines when establishing hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) goals. Setting a goal requires experience and awareness; it is time consuming and not always trivial. A previous study proposed an algorithm for assessing the recommended HbA1c target according to individual patient characteristics. Few investigations have explored the variation of HbA1c goals recommended among different types of providers.Methods: We conducted a survey regarding practice settings, practices related to diabetes mellitus type 2, and HbA1c targets recommended to patients. Our objective was to compare HbA1c goals between Dartmouth Hitchcock Healthcare System providers (including endocrinology department, general internal medicine, and family medicine providers) and a previously validated algorithm. The clinical cases presented were those used in the previously published study.Results: The survey was sent to 228 healthcare providers of whom 81 (35.5%) responded. As recommended by the guidelines, healthcare providers individualize their patients' glycemic goals. The glycemic goals proposed by the providers in our institution were similar to those proposed by the international diabetologists and by the algorithm.Conclusion: Our results further validate the proposed algorithm within a heterogeneous population of healthcare providers. The algorithm could help establish glycemic goals and assist healthcare systems in providing more standardized care.Abbreviations: ADA = American Diabetes Association; APRN = advanced practice registered nurse; DH = Dartmouth Hitchcock Healthcare System; FM = family medicine; GIM = general internal medicine; HbA1c = hemoglobin A1c; PA-C = certified physician assistant     

Provider Practice Habits And Barriers To Care In Obesity Management In A Large Multicenter Health System

Objective: To identify provider recommendations and barriers in obesity management in a multicenter academic health system with extensive weight-loss management resources.Methods: A 26-question online survey was sent to attending physicians, trainees, and advanced practice providers in primary care specialties (internal medicine, family medicine, women's health) and endocrinology.Results: The survey response rate was 26% (111/430). Of respondents, 50% were internal medicine, 24% family medicine, 16% women's health, and 9% endocrinology. The majority were attending physicians (54%) and residents (40%). About 50% of respondents advised weight loss for a body mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m² in >50% of clinic visits. Limited time (82%) was the most common reason for not discussing weight loss, followed by the perception that discussion would not change patient behavior, insufficient knowledge, and discomfort broaching the subject. Common barriers to prescribing anti-obesity medications included limited experience (57%) and concern for adverse reactions (26%). Only 44% offered bariatric surgery to >50% of their patients who met criteria. Primary reasons for not referring included concerns of high surgical risk from comorbidities (57%) and potential adverse events (32%). Endocrinology had the highest referral to surgery. Attending physicians and fellows were more likely than residents to advise weight loss at lower BMI, offer medications, and refer to bariatric surgery.Conclusion: Our study reveals reluctance and lack of primary care confidence in managing obesity with pharmacotherapy and bariatric surgery, especially in the earlier stages of obesity. Barriers to care include lack of clinic time, limited experience, and concerns about treatment risks.Abbreviations: BMI = body mass index; HbA1c = hemoglobin A1c; IRB = Institutional Review Board     

Implementation of Genetics to Personalize Medicine

Background: We stand on the verge of integrating individual genetic and genomic information into health care provision and maintenance to improve health, increase efficiency, and decrease costs. We are beginning to integrate information on inherited susceptibility, gene expression, and predicted pharmacogenomic response to refine our medical management.Objective: This article reviews the current utility of genetics and genomics in a wide array of clinical circumstances, considers the future applications, and defines some of the obstacles and potential solutions to clinical integration of genomic medicine.Methods: Using the search terms genetics, genomics, pharmacogenomics, newborn screening, long QT syndrome, BRCA1/BRCA2, maturity onset diabetes of youth, diabetes, hemochromatosis, coronary artery disease, copy number changes, genetic discrimination, and genetic education, the PubMed database was searched from January 2000 to March 2007 to identify pertinent articles. Search results were restricted to English-language and human studies.Results: Several areas of medicine have begun to incorporate genetics into clinical practice, including newborn screening and breast cancer risk stratification and treatment. Molecular genetic tests are, and will increasingly become, available for inherited arrhythmias, diabetes, cancer, coronary artery disease, and pharmacogenomics. However, there are many barriers to implementation, including the cost of testing, the genetic literacy of patients and health care providers, and concerns about genetic discrimination.Conclusion: Genetics and genomics will be increasingly utilized in every field of medicine; however, health care providers and patients must have realistic expectations about its predictive power and current limitations.     

The Synergy to Enable Glycemic Control Following Emergency Department Discharge Program for Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: Step-Diabetes

Objective: To evaluate a diabetes (DM) care delivery model among hyperglycemic adults with type 2 DM being discharged from the emergency department (ED) to home. The primary hypothesis was that a focused education and medication management intervention would lead to a greater short-term improvement in glycemic control compared to controls.Methods: A 4-week, randomized controlled trial provided antihyperglycemic medications management using an evidence-based algorithm plus survival skills diabetes self-management education (DSME) for ED patients with blood glucose (BG) levels ≥200 mg/dL. The intervention was delivered by endocrinologist-supervised certified diabetes educators. Controls received usual ED care.Results: Among 101 participants (96% Black, 54% female, 62.3% Medicaid and/or Medicare insurance), 77% completed the week 4 visit. Glycated hemoglobin A1C (A1C) went from 11.8 ± 2.4 to 10.5 ± 1.9% (P<.001) and 11.5 ± 2.0 to 11.1 ± 2.1% in the intervention and control groups, respectively (P = .012). At 4 weeks, the difference in A1C reduction between groups was 0.9% (P = .01). Mean BG decreased for both groups (P<.001), with a higher percentage of intervention patients (65%) reaching a BG <180 mg/dL compared to 29% of controls (P = .002). Hypoglycemia rates did not differ by group, and no severe hypoglycemia was reported. Medication adherence (Modified Morisky Score©) improved from low to medium (P<.001) among intervention patients and did not improve among controls.Conclusions: This study provides evidence that a focused diabetes care delivery intervention can be initiated in the ED among adults with type 2 diabetes and hyperglycemia and safely and effectively completed in the ambulatory setting. Improvement in short-term glycemic outcomes and medication adherence were observed.Abbreviations: A1C = glycated hemoglobin A1C BG = blood glucose BMI = body mass index CDE = certified diabetes educator CI = confidence interval DM = diabetes mellitus DSME = diabetes self-management education ED = emergency departmentMMAS-8 = Modified Morisky Medication Scale PCP = primary care provider POC = point of care SQ = subcutaneous     

Physicians' Self-Perceptions of Care for Emerging Adults with Type 1 Diabetes

Objective: Establishing care with adult providers is essential for emerging adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) transitioning from pediatric care. Although research evaluating the transition from pediatric to adult care has been focused primarily on patients' perceptions, little is known about the adult providers' perspectives. We sought to ascertain adult providers' perspectives of caring for the medical and psychosocial needs of this patient population.Methods: We developed and mailed a survey to 79 regional adult endocrinologists and 186 primary care physicians (PCPs) identified through 2 regional insurance plans. Questions addressed perceived aptitude in clinical aspects of diabetes management, importance and availability of diabetes team members, and opinions regarding recommended transition methods.Results: The response rate was 43% for endocrinologists and 13% for PCPs. Endocrinologists reported higher aptitude in insulin management (P<.01). PCPs reported greater aptitude in screening and treating depression (P<0.01). Although endocrinologists and PCPs did not differ in their views of the importance of care by a comprehensive team, endocrinologists reported better access to diabetes educators and dieticians than PCPs (P<.01). Recommended transition methods were described as useful.Conclusion: These preliminary results suggest that endocrinologists are better prepared to assume diabetes care of emerging adults, whereas PCPs may be better prepared to screen and treat associated depression. Future studies are needed to determine if a medical home model with cooperative management improves care for emerging adults with T1D.Abbreviations: T1D = type 1 diabetes CDE = certified diabetes educator RD = registered dietitian PCPs = primary care physicians     

Current Knowledge and Practices of Heath Care Professionals on Opioid-Induced Adrenal Insufficiency

Objective: Opioid-induced adrenal insufficiency (OIAI) is reported in up to 29% of chronic opioid users through suppression of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis. Unrecognized adrenal insufficiency leads to increased morbidity and potentially death; thus, healthcare provider (HCP) awareness of OIAI is crucial. The aim of the present study was to assess the knowledge and current practices of HCPs regarding OIAI and to identify factors associated with decreased awareness.Methods: We carried out a cross-sectional, anonymous survey of HCPs in internal medicine specialties that prescribe or care for patients taking chronic opioids.Results: Of 91 (30%) participants who completed the survey, 51 (56%) were men and 52 (57%) were in training. Most responders were general internal medicine providers (n = 33, 36%), followed by endocrinologists (n = 13, 14%) and various other specialties (n = 45, 49%). While 61 (67%) of respondents prescribed opioids, only 17 (19%) were comfortable in their knowledge of opioid side effects. Among nonendocrine providers, 53 (68%) identified adrenal insufficiency as a known opioid-induced endocrinopathy. Compared to other providers, endocrinologists were more likely to recognize opioid-related endocrinopathies (69% versus 24%, P = .01) and to identify the correct symptoms for OIAI (38% versus 9%, P <.001). One in four nonendocrine providers reported discomfort in managing glucocorticoid replacement therapy. The majority (60%) of providers indicated that online resources and continuing medical education lectures would improve knowledge of OIAI.Conclusion: Our study identified several deficiencies in HCP knowledge of opioid-induced endocrine effects, especially in nonendocrine providers. As many symptoms of OIAI overlap with those of underlying conditions, OIAI could be potentially missed, highlighting the need to further educate providers about opioid-induced endocrinopathies.Abbreviations: ACTH = adrenocorticotropic hormone; AI = adrenal insufficiency; CME = continuing medical education; HCP = healthcare professional; OIAI = opioid-induced adrenal insufficiency     

Obstetrics and Gynecology: Considerations in Career Selection

Current training programs in obstetrics and gynecology are not producing an excess of specialists in view of future manpower needs. In addition to being specialists and consultants, obstetrician-gynecologists also function as providers of primary care for women. During the last decade, three formal sub-specialties of obstetrics and gynecology have evolved: gynecologic oncology, maternal-fetal medicine and reproductive endocrinology. These have improved patient care and have altered the structure of resident education. With more American medical school graduates entering this specialty, the quality of resident applicants has improved, creating intense competition for desirable training positions. Those inclined toward a career in obstetrics and gynecology can be assured that it will provide an increasingly favorable and challenging environment for professional activity in the future.     

Health Care Transition in Young Adults with Type 1 Diabetes: Barriers to Timely Establishment of Adult Diabetes Care

ObjectiveTo examine barriers to health care transition reported by young adults with type 1 diabetes and associations between barriers and prolonged gaps between pediatric and adult diabetes care.MethodsWe surveyed young adults aged 22 to 30 years with type 1 diabetes about their transition experiences, including barriers to timely establishment of adult diabetes care. We evaluated relationships between barriers and gaps in care using multivariate logistic regression.ResultsThe response rate was 53% (258 of 484 eligible subjects). Respondents (62% female) were 26.7 ± 2.4 years old and transitioned to adult diabetes care at 19.5 ± 2.9 years. Reported barriers included lack of specific adult provider referral name (47%) or contact information (27%), competing life priorities (43%), difficulty getting an appointment (41%), feeling upset about leaving pediatrics (24%), and insurance problems (10%). In multivariate analysis, barriers most strongly associated with gaps in care >6 months were lack of adult provider name (odds ratio [OR], 6.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.0-12.7) or contact information (OR, 5.3; 95% CI, 2.0-13.9), competing life priorities (OR, 5.2; 95% CI, 2.7-10.3), and insurance problems (OR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.2-10.3). Overall, respondents reporting ≥1 moderate/major barrier (48%) had 4.7-fold greater adjusted odds of a gap in care >6 months (95% CI, 2.8-8.7).ConclusionSignificant barriers to transition, such as a lack of specific adult provider referrals, may be addressed with more robust preparation by pediatric providers and care coordination. Further study is needed to evaluate strategies to improve young adult self-care in the setting of competing life priorities. (Endocr Pract. 2013;19:946-952)     

The Effects of a Comprehensive Multidisciplinary Outpatient Diabetes Program on Hospital Readmission Rates in Patients with Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Prospective Study

Objective: The diagnosis of diabetes mellitus is associated with an increased risk of hospital readmissions. The goal of this study was to determine whether there was a difference in the rates of 30-day and 365-day hospital readmissions between diabetic patients who, upon their discharge, received diabetes care in a standard primary care setting and those who received their care in a specialized multidisciplinary diabetes program.Methods: This was a randomized controlled prospective study.Results: One hundred and ninety two consecutive patients were recruited into the study, 95 (49%) into standard care (control group) and 97 (51%) into a multidisciplinary diabetes program (intervention group). The 30-day overall hospital readmission rates (including both emergency department and hospital readmissions) were 19% in the control group and 7% in the intervention group (P = .02). The 365-day overall hospital readmission rates were 38% in the control group and 14% in the intervention group (P = .0002).Conclusion: Patients with diabetes who are assigned to a specialized multidisciplinary diabetes program upon their discharge exhibit significantly reduced hospital readmission rates at 30 days and 365 days after discharge.     

Patient Perspectives on Obesity Management: Need for Greater Discussion of BMI and Weight-Loss Options Beyond Diet and Exercise,Especially in Patients With Diabetes

Objective: To identify perceptions of obesity management in patients with and without diabetes.Methods: A 48-question survey was administered in 2018 to our Endocrinology Clinic's adult patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m². Chi-squared or Fisher's exact tests were used to compare variables between groups.Results: Of 146 respondents, 105 had diabetes and 41 did not. Most respondents were female (61.4%), African American (66.4%), and with an income <$50,000 (58.6%). Those with diabetes had significantly greater comorbidities of hypertension, high cholesterol, and arthritis. Over 90% in both groups agreed that obesity is related to hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, and early death. Only 48% were aware of their BMI, and only 30.5% with diabetes and 41.5% without diabetes perceived themselves to be obese. Over 60% in each group reported discussion of diet and exercise with their providers, whereas few in both groups reported referral to a formal weight-loss program (18.9%) or to a specialty that manages obesity (4.2%), or discussion of anti-obesity medications (11.2%) or bariatric surgery (8.4%). Reported concerns with anti-obesity medications and bariatric surgery included lack of knowledge and side effects or complications.Conclusion: These findings revealed excellent patient awareness of obesity as a health problem but misperception of obese status and unawareness of BMI. Presence of diabetes and other comorbidities did not result in greater discussion of weight-loss methods beyond diet and exercise. Increased patient education and discussion of specific weight-loss services, anti-obesity medications, and bariatric surgery are needed.Abbreviations: BMI = body mass index; DM = diabetes mellitus; HbA1c = hemoglobin A1c; HCP = healthcare provider     

Transgender Care by Endocrinologists in the United States

Objective: Little is known about the attitudes and practice patterns of transgender care by endocrinologists. The objective of this study was to assess the knowledge, practice patterns, access, and competency among a representative sample of endocrinologists in the mid-Atlantic region of the United States.Methods: An anonymous 19-item paper survey was administered to 80 conference attendees that included 61 adult endocrinologists, 13 endocrinology fellows, 2 pediatric endocrinologists, and 4 nurse practitioners/physician assistants.Results: The participation rate was estimated to be ~80%. Sixty-three percent of endocrinology providers were willing to provide transgender care, but the majority of providers had no current transgender patients under their care. Half of providers had read the Endocrine Society's clinical practice guidelines, with a rate of 70% among those under age 40. Nonetheless, only 20% were “very” comfortable in discussing gender identity and/or sexual orientation, and 41% described themselves as “somewhat” or “very” competent to provider transgender care.Conclusion: Endocrinologists and other providers have received more education and training on transgender care within the past decade. Nevertheless, many participants have had little opportunity to care for transgender patients, and they rate their competency to do so as low. Research is needed on how to increase comfort levels regarding gender identity among those who provider care to transgender patients.     

The Role of Glucagon in the Pathophysiology and Management of Diabetes

Objective: There is general recognition that insulin and glucagon are the main hormones involved in the pathophysiology of diabetes, but the role of glucagon in diabetes is complex and in some circumstances controversial. The increasing appreciation of the role of glucagon in currently used hypoglycemic agents and the ongoing development of glucagon-targeted therapies underscores glucagon's important contribution in optimizing diabetes management. The current review provides a background on glucagon physiology and pathophysiology and an update for investigators, endocrinologists, and other healthcare providers on glucagon-modulating therapies.Methods: A literature review was conducted utilizing published literature in PubMed and AccessMedicine including the years 1922–2015 using the following key words: glucagon, bihormonal, diabetes mellitus, glucagon antagonists, glucagon-targeted therapies.Results: Glucagon is a counterregulatory hormone that promotes hepatic glucose production, thus preventing hypoglycemia in normal physiology. In patients with diabetes mellitus, glucagon secretion may be unregulated, which contributes to problems with glucose homeostasis. Several of the most effective therapies for diabetes have been found to suppress glucagon secretion or action, which may contribute to their success. Additionally, glucagon-specific targeted therapies, such as glucagon receptor antagonists, are being studied at a basic and clinical level.Conclusion: Glucagon plays an important role in contributing to hyperglycemia in patients with diabetes. Utilizing hypoglycemic agents that decrease glucagon secretion or inhibit glucagon action can help improve glycemic control, making these agents a valuable resource in diabetes therapy.Abbreviations:cAMP = cyclic adenosine monophosphateDPP-4 = dipeptidyl peptidase 4GLP-1 = glucagon-like peptide 1GR^-/- = glucagon receptor knockoutGR-ASO = antisense oligonucleotides targeted against the glucagon receptorHbA1c = hemoglobin A1cHGP = hepatic glucose productionSGLT-2 = sodium-glucose cotrans-porter 2T1DM = type 1 diabetes mellitusT2DM = type 2 diabetes mellitus     

Quality of Life and Insulin Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Background: A frequently cited barrier to insulin use in type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) is concern about the adverse effects on quality of life. Results of studies in this area have been mixed, with insulin use showing decreased, enhanced, or no impact on quality of life.Objective: The purpose of this paper is to discuss the state of the science regarding the effects of insulin on quality of life and to present strategies providers can implement in their clinical practices to decrease barriers to insulin use among patients with type 2 DM.Methods: An English-language MEDLINE search of the current literature using the terms insulin and quality of life was conducted for this article.Results: Although patient-identified concerns regarding insulin use represent some aspects of quality of life, study results have been mixed. However, 2 large studies examining the use of insulin glargine and its effects on quality of life found that glargine was associated with significantly greater improvements in quality of life when added to oral antidiabetic agents (OADs) than was the use of OADs alone. Another study examined the effects of intensive multi- therapy (monthly visits, self-management diabetes education, and medication adjustments) on quality of life among patients with type 2 DM and found that quality-of-life scores improved among patients who initiated insulin therapy during the trial. The effects of insulin delivery systems on quality of life have also been assessed. In these studies, patients preferred insulin pens over vials and syringes and inhaled over injected insulin. Health care providers can facilitate acceptance of insulin by employing strategies to help patients overcome psychological barriers to insulin therapy.Conclusions: Although patient concerns about the effects of insulin use are legitimate, insulin therapy is often needed to achieve treatment targets. Providers can reduce the impact on quality of life by addressing barriers, helping patients improve metabolic control, and providing ongoing information and support.     

Implications of the ADA/EASD consensus algorithm for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus for primary care practitioners: Four pivotal points

Background: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) is appearing in adults at an epidemic rate. Primary care clinicians will, out of necessity, provide diabetes care for most patients with type 2 DM. A systematic care plan will contribute to effective and cost-efficient management of the increasing number of diabetic patients presenting in the primary care setting.Objectives: The aims of this article were to review the consensus algorithm developed by the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (ADA/EASD) for the treatment of type 2 DM and to increase awareness of this document within the community that is most likely to manage patients with type 2 DM.Methods: Research was focused on the value of the consensus algorithm to primary care practitioners for the management of patients with type 2 DM.Results: Research revealed 4 aspects of the algorithm involving use of medications (including insulin) and measurement of glycosylated hemoglobin levels that would help health care providers construct a systematic and workable plan for aggressive treatment of type 2 DM.Conclusions: The 4 issues raised within the ADA/EASD consensus algorithm have a significant impact on primary care practitioners and challenge usual practices in the care of patients with type 2 DM.     

Risk Factors for Hypoglycemia in Inpatients with Total Parenteral Nutrition and Type 2 Diabetes: A Post HOC Analysis of the Insupar Study

Objective: Treatment of hyperglycemia with insulin is associated with increased risk of hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients receiving total parenteral nutrition (TPN). The aim of this study was to determine the predictors of hypoglycemia in hospitalized T2DM patients receiving TPN.Methods: Post hoc analysis of the INSUPAR study, which is a prospective, open-label, multicenter clinical trial of adult inpatients with T2DM in a noncritical setting with indication for TPN.Results: The study included 161 patients; 31 patients (19.3%) had hypoglycemic events, but none of them was severe. In univariate analysis, hypoglycemia was significantly associated with the presence of diabetes with end-organ damage, duration of diabetes, use of insulin prior to admission, glycemic variability (GV), belonging to the glargine insulin group in the INSUPAR trial, mean daily grams of lipids in TPN, mean insulin per 10 grams of carbohydrates, duration of TPN, and increase in urea during TPN. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that the presence of diabetes with end-organ damage, GV, use of glargine insulin, and TPN duration were risk factors for hypoglycemia.Conclusion: The presence of T2DM with end-organ damage complications, longer TPN duration, belonging to the glargine insulin group, and greater GV are factors associated with the risk of hypoglycemia in diabetic noncritically ill inpatients with parenteral nutrition.Abbreviations: ADA = American Diabetes Association; BMI = body mass index; CV% = coefficient of variation; DM = diabetes mellitus; GI = glargine insulin; GV = glycemic variability; ICU = intensive care unit; RI = regular insulin; T2DM = type 2 diabetes mellitus; TPN = total parenteral nutrition     

Gender Differences in patient-provider symptom agreement in reporting respiratory complaints on a questionnaire

Background: Men and women communicate differently, but it is unclear whether this influences health care outcomes.Objective: Because women patients frequently choose women health care providers, we examined whether this preference was affected by communication styles. We focused on communication of disease-specific symptoms, hypothesizing that symptom agreement between women patients and women health care providers would be greater than between other patient-provider gender combinations.Methods: Patients attending outpatient clinics were recruited as part of a study of respiratory illness at 7 university-affiliated sites during 3 consecutive influenza seasons (2000–2003). Individuals aged ≥ 19 years were offered enrollment if they sought care for cold or flu symptoms at a participating study site. Patients were eligible to participate in the study if they reported any 1 of 6 symptoms: cough, runny nose, fever (subjective), muscle aches, sore throat, and/or exhaustion. Using separate questionnaires, patients and their health care providers recorded the patients' respiratory symptoms (as present or absent). Patients recorded their symptoms before visiting their health care provider, and providers recorded patient symptoms after the visit. Symptom agreement was compared using general estimating equations across all gender combinations.Results: A total of 327 patients (220 women, 107 men) and 84 health care providers (37 women, 47 men) participated in the study. Overall symptom agreement for all patient-provider gender combinations was 81.9% (95% CI, 79.6%–84.2%). For each symptom, the observed agreement significantly exceeded the agreement expected by chance alone (P < 0.001 for all symptoms except “no energy,” which was P = 0.023). The male-male pairing of patient and provider was more likely to agree on a symptom than were the other gender combinations, although not statistically significantly more so than the female-female pairing.Conclusions: In this survey of patients with respiratory illness, there was no significant difference in symptom agreement for most symptoms between the male-male and female-female patient-provider combinations. Based on these findings, symptom agreement alone does not explain why women patients select women health care providers.     

Improvements in Metabolic Control in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Following Referral to a Diabetes Center, 2005–2010

Objective: We aimed to compare metabolic control in adults with diabetes in the general population to those newly referred to a diabetes center and after 1 year of specialty care.Methods: We performed a retrospective comparison of adults with diabetes aged ≥20 years data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES, n = 1,674) and a diabetes center (n = 3,128) from 2005–2010. NHANES participants represented the civilian, non-institutionalized U.S. population. Diabetes center referrals lived primarily around eastern Massachusetts. The proportion attaining targets for glycated hemoglobin A1c (A1c), blood pressure (BP), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, or all 3 (ABC control) and the proportion prescribed medications to lower A1c, BP, or cholesterol were evaluated.Results: Compared to the general sample, a smaller proportion of new diabetes center referrals had A1c <7% (<53 mmol/mol, 24% vs. 53%, P<.001), BP <130/80 mm Hg (38% vs. 50%, P<.001), and ABC control (5.6% vs. 17%, P<.001) but not LDL<100 mg/dL (<2.6 mmol/L, 54% vs. 53%, P = .65). After 1 year, more diabetes center referrals attained targets for A1c (40%), BP (38%), LDL (67%), and ABC control (15%) (P<.001 for all versus baseline). ABC control was not different between the general sample and diabetes center referrals at 1 year (P = .16). After 1 year, a greater percentage of diabetes center referrals compared to the general sample were prescribed medications to lower glucose (95% vs. 72%), BP (79% vs. 64%), and cholesterol (77% vs. 54%)(all P<.001).Conclusion: Compared to the general population, glycemic control was significantly worse for adults newly referred to the diabetes center. Within 1 year of specialty care, ABC control increased 270% in the setting of significant therapy escalation.Abbreviations:A1c = glycated hemoglobin A1cABC = composite of A1c, blood pressure, and cholesterolACEi = angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitorARB = angiotensin receptor blockerBMI = body mass indexBP = blood pressureEHR = electronic health recordLDL = low-density lipoproteinNCHS = National Center for Health StatisticsNHANES = National Health and Nutrition Examination SurveyPCP = primary care provider