Current Knowledge and Practices of Heath Care Professionals on Opioid-Induced Adrenal Insufficiency

Objective: Opioid-induced adrenal insufficiency (OIAI) is reported in up to 29% of chronic opioid users through suppression of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis. Unrecognized adrenal insufficiency leads to increased morbidity and potentially death; thus, healthcare provider (HCP) awareness of OIAI is crucial. The aim of the present study was to assess the knowledge and current practices of HCPs regarding OIAI and to identify factors associated with decreased awareness.Methods: We carried out a cross-sectional, anonymous survey of HCPs in internal medicine specialties that prescribe or care for patients taking chronic opioids.Results: Of 91 (30%) participants who completed the survey, 51 (56%) were men and 52 (57%) were in training. Most responders were general internal medicine providers (n = 33, 36%), followed by endocrinologists (n = 13, 14%) and various other specialties (n = 45, 49%). While 61 (67%) of respondents prescribed opioids, only 17 (19%) were comfortable in their knowledge of opioid side effects. Among nonendocrine providers, 53 (68%) identified adrenal insufficiency as a known opioid-induced endocrinopathy. Compared to other providers, endocrinologists were more likely to recognize opioid-related endocrinopathies (69% versus 24%, P = .01) and to identify the correct symptoms for OIAI (38% versus 9%, P <.001). One in four nonendocrine providers reported discomfort in managing glucocorticoid replacement therapy. The majority (60%) of providers indicated that online resources and continuing medical education lectures would improve knowledge of OIAI.Conclusion: Our study identified several deficiencies in HCP knowledge of opioid-induced endocrine effects, especially in nonendocrine providers. As many symptoms of OIAI overlap with those of underlying conditions, OIAI could be potentially missed, highlighting the need to further educate providers about opioid-induced endocrinopathies.Abbreviations: ACTH = adrenocorticotropic hormone; AI = adrenal insufficiency; CME = continuing medical education; HCP = healthcare professional; OIAI = opioid-induced adrenal insufficiency     

Glucocorticoid-Induced Adrenal Insufficiency: A Study of the Incidence in Hospital Patients and A Review of Peri-Operative Management

Objective: Glucocorticoid (GC) pharmacotherapy is an effective treatment for a range of diseases, but exposure can suppress the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, leading to glucocorticoid-induced adrenal insufficiency (GC-AI) in some patients. However, the incidence of diagnosed GC-AI and the associated health burden, including the incidence of adrenal crises (ACs), are unknown. Although GC-AI treatment is based on well-established principles, there are no agreed protocols regarding the peri-operative management of exposed patients. The aims of this study were to assess the incidence of diagnosed GC-AI in hospital patients and review current approaches to peri-operative management of surgical patients with GC exposure.Methods: An analysis of hospital admission data concerning adult patients diagnosed with GC-AI and a review of published recommendations for peri-operative GC cover.Results: Between 2001 and 2013, admission with a diagnosis of GC-AI in New South Wales, Australia was rare (annual average of 22.5 admissions/year) and ACs were even more rare (n = 3). Almost two-thirds (64.4%, n = 188) of the patients with diagnosed GC-AI were aged between 50 and 79 years and 45.2% (n = 132) had a comorbid infection. The current approach to peri-operative management of patients with GC exposure appears to be influenced by both the absence of clear guidelines and historic practices. This results in the exposure of some patients to supraphysiologic doses of GCs during the peri-operative period.Conclusion: Hospital admission with a diagnosis of GC-AI (with or without an AC) is very rare. Clear guidelines on peri-operative GC cover are necessary to avoid overreplacement with supraphysiologic doses in susceptible patients.Abbreviations: AC = adrenal crisis; ACTH = adrenocorticotropic hormone; AI = adrenal insufficiency; CI = confidence interval; GC = glucocorticoid; GC-AI = glucocorticoid-induced adrenal insufficiency; HPA = hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal; OR = odds ratio     

Management and Outcomes of Giant Prolactinoma: A Series of 71 Patients

Objective: To describe outcomes of patients with giant prolactinoma (≥4 cm) and identify predictors of therapeutic response.Methods: In this retrospective study, complete biochemical and structural response were defined as prolactin (PRL) ≤25 ng/mL and no visible tumor at follow-up, respectively.Results: Giant prolactinoma (median size, 4.8 cm [range, 4 to 9.8 cm]; median PRL, 5,927 ng/mL [range, 120 to 100,000 ng/mL]) was diagnosed in 71 patients. Treatments included: dopamine agonists (DAs) (n = 70, 99%), surgery (n = 30, 42%), radiation (n = 10, 14%), and somatostatin analogs (n = 2, 3%). Patients treated with DA monotherapy were older compared with those who received subsequent therapies (47 years vs. 28 years; P = .003) but had similar initial PRL and tumor size. Surgically managed patients were younger compared with the nonsurgical group (35 years vs. 46 years; P = .02) and had lower initial PRL (3,121 ng/mL vs. 6,920 ng/mL; P = .02), yet they had similar tumor response. Hypopituitarism was more common following surgery compared to medical management: adrenal insufficiency (69% vs. 27%; P<.001), hypothyroidism (67% vs. 38%; P = .02), growth hormone deficiency (24% vs. 6%; P = .04), and diabetes insipidus (17% vs. 3%; P = .04). Therapeutic response did not correlate with sex, age, initial PRL, tumor size, or first-line therapy mode. At median follow-up of 4.8 years, the median PRL was 18.3 ng/mL (range, 0.6 to 12,680 ng/mL), and final volume was 0.9 cm³ (range, 0 to 43.0 cm³). In those with available data, 36/65 (55%) patients achieved PRL normalization, and 16/61 (26%) had no visible tumor at follow-up.Conclusion: Most patients with giant prolactinoma have excellent response to DA. Sex, age, initial PRL, and tumor size do not predict therapeutic response.Abbreviations: BRC = bromocriptine; CAB = cabergoline; CSF = cerebrospinal fluid; DA = dopamine agonist; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; PRL = prolactin     

Predicting Recovery Of The Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis After Prolonged Glucocorticoid Use

Objective: Prolonged exposure to glucocorticoids lead to hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis suppression that recovers after cessation of treatment. We aimed to identify the predictive factors for HPA axis recovery after prolonged glucocorticoid use.Methods: Retrospective review of patients who had undergone first short Synacthen test (SST) to assess HPA axis recovery after prolonged use of glucocorticoids.Results: A total of 61% (20/33) of patients had adequate SST response at a median time of 2 years after diagnosis of adrenal insufficiency. Those who had adequate response during SST had higher ambulatory early morning cortisol (P<.01), shorter duration of exposure to glucocorticoids (P = .01), and lower final cumulative hydrocortisone replacement dose (P = .03). Age, gender, body mass index, indications for glucocorticoid use, and basal adrenocorticotropic hormone levels were not predictive of HPA axis recovery. On multivariate analysis, ambulatory early morning cortisol was the only independent predictor of adequate SST response (odds ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 1.01 to 1.04; P = .02). Using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, ambulatory early morning cortisol of 8.8 μg/dL predicted a positive SST response with a sensitivity of 70% and specificity of 93%.Conclusion: Early morning ambulatory cortisol could be used to decide on timely SST in order to prevent complications from unnecessary replacement with glucocorticoids.Abbreviations: ACTH = adrenocorticotropic hormone; BMI = body mass index; CV = coefficient of variation; HPA = hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal; SST = short Synacthen test     

Genetic Forms of Adrenal Insufficiency

Objective: The American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Adrenal Scientific Committee has developed a series of articles to update members on the genetics of adrenal diseases.Methods: Case presentation, discussion of literature, table, and bullet point conclusions.Results: The genetic mutations associated with several familial causes of adrenal insufficiency have now been identified. The most common ones that will be discussed here include Allgrove syndrome, adrenoleukodystrophy, adrenal hypoplasia congenita, autoimmune polyglandular syndrome type 1, congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH), lipoid CAH, and familial glucocorticoid deficiency. Although these diseases most commonly present in childhood, some rarely present in adulthood, and thus all endocrinologists must be familiar with these syndromes. Some patients only develop glucocorticoid deficiency, and others have both glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid deficiency. These diseases may be associated with other conditions, especially neurologic disease, hypogonadism, or dermatologic problems. Diagnosis is suspected based on clinical presentation and laboratory findings. Gene testing may be necessary for confirmation of a diagnosis and/or screening of family members.Conclusion: This article briefly reviews the various familial adrenal insufficiency syndromes and the specific associated gene defects.Abbreviations: AAA = Allgrove syndrome (alachrima-achalasiaadrenal insufficiency) ACTH = adrenocorticotropic hormone AHC = adrenal hypoplasia congenita ALD = adrenoleukodystrophy CAH = congenital adrenal hyperplasia DAX1 = dosage-sensitive sex reversal, adrenal hypoplasia congenita, X-chromosome FGD = familial glucocorticoid deficiency LCAH = lipoid CAH MCM4 = mini-chromosome maintenancedeficient 4 SF1 = steroidogenic factor 1 VLCFA = very-long-chain fatty acid     

Mifepristone Treatment for Mild Autonomous Cortisol Secretion Due to Adrenal Adenomas: A Pilot Study

Objective: Adrenal incidentalomas are increasingly detected with the widespread use of thoracic and abdominal imaging. The most common secretory syndrome in adrenal nodules is autonomous cortisol secretion (ACS). Recent data show that even mild cortisol excess is associated with adverse outcomes. The glucocorticoid receptor antagonist mifepristone has been used in patients with overt Cushing syndrome and hyperglycemia. The purpose of our study was to determine the effect of mifepristone on metabolic parameters in patients with ACS and concomitant prediabetes or diabetes.Methods: Eight patients with either unilateral or bilateral adrenal nodules with ACS were included in the study. Fasting laboratory tests including glucose and insulin levels to calculate homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) were performed at baseline and again after either 3 months (3 patients) or 6 months (5 patients) on mifepristone 300 mg daily treatment. Patients also completed several validated surveys on mood and quality of life at baseline and follow-up.Results: There were significant reductions in fasting glucose measurements and insulin resistance as measured by HOMA-IR in the 6 of 8 study patients in whom these measurements were available (P = .03).Conclusion: This pilot study demonstrates that mifepristone treatment of ACS is associated with a significant decrease in fasting glucose and insulin resistance as measured by HOMA-IR scores. Mifepristone treatment of ACS may be considered as a medical option for patients with ACS due to adrenal adenomas with concomitant abnormal glucose parameters in whom surgical removal is not being considered.Abbreviations: ACS = autonomous cortisol secretion; ACTH = adrenocorticotropic hormone; AI = adrenal incidentaloma; DHEAS = dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate; GR = glucocorticoid receptor; HbA1c = hemoglobin A1c; HOMA-IR = homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance; ODT = overnight dexamethasone suppression test; QoL = quality of life; STAI = state trait anxiety inventory; TSH = thyroid stimulating hormone; UFC = urinary free cortisol     

Primary Adrenal Lymphoma: a Single-Center Experience

Objective: To describe the clinical presentation, biochemistry, imaging features, and treatment outcome of patients with primary adrenal lymphoma (PAL) presenting to a single tertiary care center.Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of case records of 7 patients diagnosed with PAL between January 2011 and May 2014 at our institution in Mumbai, India.Results: Median age of presentation in our series was 48 years (range, 41 to 60 years), with a male to female ratio of 6:1. Bilateral adrenal involvement was seen in 4 of 7 patients (58%). Adrenal insufficiency (AI) was seen in 3 of the 4 patients with bilateral involvement (75%). Computed tomography showed slight to moderate contrast enhancement of adrenal masses in 4 of 5 patients (80%). Diffuse, large, B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) was the most common immunophenotype (85%). One patient died due to rapid disease progression even before starting chemotherapy. Six patients were treated with chemotherapy and/or external beam radiotherapy. After 1 year, 2 more patients had died, whereas 4 patients were in remission.Conclusion: PAL should always be considered in differential diagnosis of bilateral adrenal mass with AI. DLBCL is the most common histologic subtype of PAL. Despite treatment, long-term prognosis of PAL remains poor.Abbreviations: AI = adrenal insufficiency B/L = bilateral CT = computed tomography DLBCL = diffuse, large, B-cell lymphoma EBRT = external beam radiotherapy ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT= ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography PAL = primary adrenal lymphoma T/NK = T cell/natural killer cell     

Increasing Prevalence Of Addison Disease: Results From A Nationwide Study

Objective: Primary adrenal insufficiency is a life-threatening endocrine disease unless properly treated. However, few studies on the prevalence, concomitances of the disease, and prescribing of drugs have been published. The goal of the study was to establish the prevalence of primary adrenal insufficiency in Iceland and additionally, to study the most common concomitant diseases in patients with primary adrenal insufficiency, as well as the mode of glucocorticoid replacement therapies.Methods: To achieve this, the medical records of all patients in Iceland who had received the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision, diagnosis code E27, were evaluated for true primary adrenal insufficiency. Additionally, these records were evaluated for concomitant diseases, as well as the mode of glucocorticoid replacement therapy. The study covered the whole population of Iceland over 18 years of age. It was thus a nationwide study. The records were retrieved from large hospitals and clinics and every practicing specialist in endocrinology.Results: Primary adrenal insufficiency was found in 53 individuals, 26 women and 27 men, yielding a prevalence of 22.1 per 100,000 population. Hypothyroidism was by far the most common concomitant disease. Most patients had their glucocorticoid deficiency replaced with shortacting glucocorticoids.Conclusion: The prevalence of primary adrenal insufficiency in Iceland is higher than in earlier reports, with comorbidities being in line with recent studies. Treatment is according to the latest protocols.Abbreviations:CAH = congenital adrenal hyperplasiaCVD = cardiovascular diseaseDM = diabetes mellitusGC = glucocorticoidLSH = Landspitali National University HospitalPAI = primary adrenal insufficiencyPAS = polyendocrine autoimmune syndrome     

Morning Serum Cortisol Level After Transsphenoidal Surgery for Pituitary Adenoma Predicts Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal Function Despite Intraoperative Dexamethasone Use

Objective: Perioperative glucocorticoid (GC) is rarely needed in patients undergoing transsphenoidal surgery (TSS). We instituted a steroid-sparing protocol in the settings of intraoperative dexamethasone use. We evaluated the safety of using a cut off cortisol level of 14 μg/dL on postoperative day (POD)-1 and -6 after dexamethasone use during the surgery. We also analyzed the efficacy of serial morning cortisol levels for weaning GC replacement.Methods: The charts of 48 adult patients who received dexamethasone 4 mg intraoperatively were reviewed. Morning cortisol levels were measured on POD-1. Patients with cortisol ≥14 μg/dL were discharged without CG replacement. Morning cortisol level was checked routinely on POD-6, and GC replacement was initiated when the level was <14 μg/dL. Serial cortisol levels were measured in patients requiring GC after the first postoperative week.Results: Overall, 67% patients had POD-1 cortisol ≥14 μg/dL and did not require GC on discharge. After POD-6, 83% of patients were not on GC replacement. A cosyntropin stimulation testing (CST) was only performed in 3 patients. There were no hospital admissions for adrenal crisis during the postoperative period.Conclusion: A steroid-sparing protocol with POD-1 and -6 morning cortisol levels can be safely and effectively used in the settings of intraoperative dexamethasone administration. It leads to avoidance of GC in more than two-thirds of patients on discharge and more than 80% of patients after the first postoperative week. We found that dynamic adrenal testing could be omitted in the majority of patients by using serial morning cortisol levels to assess the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis.Abbreviations: ACTH = adrenocorticotropic hormone AI = adrenal insufficiency CST = cosyntropin stimulation test ECLIA = electrochemiluminescence immunoassay GC = glucocorticoid HPA = hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal ITT = insulin tolerance test POD = postoperative day TSS = transsphenoidal surgery     

Utility of a Glucocorticoid Sparing Strategy in the Management of Patients Following Transsphenoidal Surgery

Objective: Following transsphenoidal surgery (TSS), it is important to assess for and manage adrenal insufficiency (AI). The goal of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of a glucocorticoid (GC) sparing protocol to limit GC exposure in patients undergoing TSS.Methods: Adult patients undergoing TSS (excluding Cushing disease) with adequate adrenal function prior to surgery underwent TSS without perioperative GC coverage. Following TSS, daily morning fasting serum cortisol levels were tested. GCs were administered at stress doses for serum cortisol <5 mcg/dL, between 5 and 12 mcg/dL in the presence of clinically significant symptoms of AI, or >12 mcg/dL with severe headache, nausea or vomiting, fatigue, anorexia, or hyponatremia. The primary endpoint was the use of GCs in the immediate postoperative period.Results: Of 178 subjects, GCs were administered to 80 (45%) patients for the following indications: 31.3% for serum cortisol <5 mcg/dL; 36.3% for cortisol between 5 and 12 mcg/dL accompanied by symptoms or signs of AI; 8.8% for moderate to severe postoperative hyponatremia; and 7.5% for severe headache, nausea and vomiting, fatigue, or anorexia with cortisol >12 mcg/dL. Logistic regression analysis showed that longer length of hospital stay (odds ratio [OR] 1.22, confidence interval [CI] 1.02–1.45) and the presence of new postoperative anterior pituitary hormone deficiency (OR 3.3, CI 1.26–8.67) were associated with postoperative GC use. By 12 weeks, only 14% of subjects remained on GCs. There were no adverse events related to withholding GCs.Conclusion: Our protocol for managing GC replacement is both safe and effective for limiting GC exposure in patients undergoing TSS.Abbreviations:AI = adrenal insufficiencyCI = confidence intervalFSH = follicle-stimulating hormoneGC = glucocorticoidGH = growth hormoneIGF-1 = insulin-like growth factor-1IV = intravenousLH = luteinizing hormoneLOS = length of hospital stayOR = odds ratioTSS = transsphenoidal surgery     

The Low-Dose Acth Stimulation Test: is 30 Minutes Long Enough?

Objective: Controversy persists regarding the use of the low-dose adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) stimulation test (LDST) for the diagnosis of adrenal insufficiency (AI) and optimal test result interpretation. However, many centers are now using the LDST to assess cortisol secretion adequacy, and some only use a 30-minute cortisol level to determine adrenal sufficiency or AI. This study examined both 30- and 60-minute cortisol levels to assess whether the interpretation of the test was affected when both cortisol levels were taken into consideration.Methods: Data were obtained by retrospective chart review from a single pediatric endocrinology unit over a 7-year period. We identified 82 patients who completed the LDST. Their mean age was 11.7 years, and 37% were female. Cortisol levels were evaluated at baseline and 30 and 60 minutes after cosyntropin administration. A cutoff value ≥18 μg/dL was used to define adrenal sufficiency.Results: We found that 54% of patients reached peak cortisol levels at 60 minutes, and 11 patients who did not pass the test at 30 minutes did so at 60 minutes. The only predictive characteristic was weight status; overweight and obese individuals tended to peak at 30 minutes, and normal and underweight individuals tended to peak at 60 minutes.Conclusion: Although further studies are necessary to confirm our findings, it appears that measuring cortisol both 30 and 60 minutes following synthetic ACTH administration may be necessary to avoid overdiagnosing AI.Abbreviations: ACTH = adrenocorticotropic hormone AI = adrenal insufficiency BMI = body mass index LDST = low-dose ACTH stimulation test MRI = magnetic resonance imaging     

Serum Morning Cortisol as A Screening Test for Adrenal Insufficiency

Objective: To evaluate the performance of morning serum cortisol (MSC) compared to a 10 mg adrenocortico-tropic hormone (ACTH) stimulation test in the diagnosis of adrenal insufficiency (AI).Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of ACTH stimulation tests were conducted. From a total of 312 potentially eligible ACTH stimulation tests, 306 met the inclusion criteria. The population was randomized into 2 groups: test (n = 159) and validation (n = 147). In the test group, the receiver operating characteristics curve test evaluated the diagnostic performance of MSC.Results: A subnormal cortisol response to ACTH was found in 25.8% of the test group. The area under the curve values of MSC to predict AI at +30 minutes, +60 minutes, or at maximal cortisol response were 0.874, 0.897, and 0.925 (95% confidence interval &lsqb;CI] 0.81 to 0.92, 0.83 to 0.93, and 0.87 to 0.96). The Youden index was 234.2 mmol/L with a sensitivity of 83.3% (95% CI 65.2 to 94.3%), and a specificity of 89.1% (95% CI 82.4 to 93.9%). Positive and negative predictive values were 64.1% (95% CI 47.1 to 78.8%) and 95.8% (95% CI 90.5 to 98.6%). There was no difference in age, gender, AI prevalence, or mean serum cortisol at +30 or +60 minutes in the validation group; however, a lower mean MSC value was found. Lower sensitivity and specificity values (88.3% and 60%, respectively) were found for the 234.2 mmol/L cutoff value.Conclusion: This study supports the role of MSC as a first-step diagnostic test in patients with clinically suspected AI. The short stimulation test could be omitted in almost half of the cases. Prospective and longitudinal studies to reproduce and confirm the cutoff values proposed are warranted.Abbreviations: ACTH = adrenocorticotropic hormone; AI = adrenal insufficiency; AUC = area under the curve; CI = confidence interval; HPA = hypothalamic pituitary adrenal; ITT = insulin tolerance test; MSC = morning serum cortisol     

Safety And Efficacy Of Dpp-4 Inhibitors For The Management Of Hospitalized General Medicine And Surgery Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

Objective: DPP-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) have been shown to be effective for the management of inpatient diabetes. We report pooled data from 3 prospective studies using DPP-4i in general medicine and surgery patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).Methods: We combined data from 3 randomized studies comparing DPP-4i alone or in combination with basal insulin or a basal-bolus insulin regimen. Medicine (n = 266) and surgery (n = 319) patients admitted with a blood glucose (BG) between 140 and 400 mg/dL, treated with diet, oral agents, or low-dose insulin therapy were included. Patients received DPP-4i alone (n = 144), DPP-4i plus basal insulin (n = 158) or basal-bolus regimen (n = 283). All groups received correctional doses with rapid-acting insulin for BG >140 mg/dL. The primary endpoint was differences in mean daily BG between groups. Secondary endpoints included differences in hypoglycemia and hospital complications.Results: There were no differences in mean hospital daily BG among patients treated with DPP-4i alone (170 ± 37 mg/dL), DPP-4i plus basal (172 ± 42 mg/dL), or basalbolus (172 ± 43 mg/dL), P = .94; or in the percentage of BG readings within target of 70 to 180 mg/dL (63 ± 32%, 60 ± 31%, and 64 ± 28%, respectively; P = .42). There were no differences in length of stay or complications, but hypoglycemia was less common with DPP-4i alone (2%) compared to DPP-4i plus basal (9%) and basal-bolus (10%); P = .004.Conclusion: Treatment with DPP-4i alone or in combination with basal insulin is effective and results in a lower incidence of hypoglycemia compared to a basal-bolus insulin regimen in general medicine and surgery patients with T2D.Abbreviations: BG = blood glucose; BMI = body mass index; CI = confidence interval; DPP-4i = dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors; HbA1c = hemoglobin A1c; OR = odds ratio; T2D = type 2 diabetes     

Two Treatment Approaches for Human Regular U-500 Insulin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes not Achieving Adequate Glycemic Control on High-Dose U-100 Insulin Therapy With or Without Oral Agents: A Randomized,Titration-To-Target Clinical Trial

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of 2 dosing regimens for human regular U-500 insulin (U-500R, 500 units/mL) replacing high-dose U-100 insulins with or without oral antihyperglycemic drugs in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D).Methods: We conducted a 24-week, open-label, parallel trial in 325 patients (demographics [means]: age, 55.4 years; diabetes duration, 15.2 years; body mass index, 41.9 kg/m²; glycated hemoglobin [HbA_1c], 8.7%; U-100 insulin dose, 287.5 units administered in 5 injections/day [median; range, 2 to 10]). Patients were randomized to thrice-daily (TID, n = 162) or twice-daily (BID, n = 163) U-500R after a 4-week lead-in period. The primary outcome was HbA_1c change from baseline.Results: After 24 weeks, both treatments demonstrated significant HbA_1c reductions (TID, -1.12%; BID, -1.22%; both, P<.001) and clinical equivalence (difference, -0.10%; 95% confidence interval, -0.33 to 0.12%; noninferiority margin, 0.4%). Comparable increases in total daily U-500R dose (TID, 242.7 to 343.1 units; BID, 249.0 to 335.0 units) were observed. Incidence and rate of documented symptomatic hypoglycemia (≤70 mg/dL) were lower for TID versus BID (P = .003 and P = .02, respectively); severe hypoglycemia was similar between treatments. Weight gain was similar in both groups (TID, 5.4 kg; BID, 4.9 kg).Conclusion: Initiation and titration of U-500R using either algorithm (TID or BID) improves glycemic control effectively and safely with fewer injections in patients with T2D treated with high-dose/high-volume U-100 insulin. These results provide clinicians with a practical framework for using U-500R in severely insulin-resistant patients with suboptimally controlled T2D.Abbreviations: BID = twice daily FAS = full analysis set HbA_1c = glycated hemoglobin PG = plasma glucose SMPG = self-monitored plasma glucose T2D = type 2 diabetes TDD = total daily dose TID = thrice daily U-500R = human regular U-500 insulin     

Pituitary Dysfunction in Patients with Intracranial Germ Cell Tumors Treated with Radiotherapy

Objective:To evaluate the endocrine abnormalities in intracranial germ cell tumors (iGCTs) treated with radio-therapy (RT), and to discuss the effects of RT on pituitary functions.Methods: Seventy-seven patients diagnosed with iGCTs who had received RT and endocrine follow-up in Huashan Hospital between January 2010 and July 2017 were retrospectively analyzed, consisting of 49 germinomas and 28 NGGCTs. The median follow-up period was 50.0 months. Fifty-one patients had radiologically proved suprasellar/sellar lesions.Results: The male to female ratio was 62/15. The median endocrine follow-up period was 19 (4, 42) months. The median age at the last endocrine visit was 18 (16, 20) years old. The 5-year overall and recurrence-free survival were both 98.7%. The overall prevalence of central adrenal insufficiency (CAI), central hypothyroidism (CHT), central hypogonadism (CHG), hyperprolactinemia, and central diabetes insipidus (CDI) was 57.3%, 56%, 56.6%, 35.3%, and 52.1%, respectively, after RT. Patients having suprasellar/sellar lesions showed significantly higher post-therapeutic prevalence of hypopituitarism than those who didn’t. Compared to that before RT, CAI, CHT, and CHG weren’t significantly improved while the levels of prolactin and the prevalence of CDI declined significantly (P =.03 and.001). The radiation doses to pituitary and hypothalamus between those with and without CAI, CHT, and CHG weren’t significantly different.Conclusion: The prevalence of hypopituitarism was high in iGCTs, especially in those with suprasellar/sellar involvement. The levels of prolactin and the prevalence of CDI declined significantly after RT. The hypopituitarism in iGCTs was mainly induced by tumor effects, and RT showed no additional damage to pituitary functions in our study.Abbreviations: AFP = alpha-fetoprotein; CAI = central adrenal insufficiency; CDI = central diabetes insipidus; CHG = central hypogonadism; CHT = central hypothyroidism; CT = computed tomography; DA = dopamine; GH = growth hormone; βHCG = beta-human chorionic gonadotropin; HPA = hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal; HPG = hypothalamus-pituitary-gonadal; HPL = hyperprolactinemia; HPT = hypothalamus-pituitary-thyroid; iGCT = intracranial germ cell tumor; IGF-1 = insulin-like growth factor 1; NGGCT = nongerminomatous germ cell tumors; OS = overall survival; PFS = progression-free survival; PRL = hypothalamus-pituitary-prolactin; RT = radiotherapy     

Clinical Outcomes in Adrenal Incidentaloma: Experience From one Center

Objective: To investigate the outcome in patients with adrenal incidentaloma (AI).Methods: A retrospective evaluation of 637 patients with AI referred to a tertiary center over 8 years. Radiologic and hormonal evaluations were performed at baseline. Follow-up imaging was carried out if necessary, and hormonal evaluation was performed at 24 months according to national guidelines.Results: The mean age was 62.7 ± 11.6 years, and the mean AI size was 25.3 ± 17.0 mm at presentation. Hormonal evaluation revealed that 85.4% of all tumors were nonfunctioning adenomas, 4.1% subclinical Cushing syndrome (SCS), 1.4% pheochromocytoma, 1.4% primary hyperaldosteronism, 0.8% Cushing syndrome, 0.6% adrenocortical carcinoma, 0.3% congenital adrenal hyperplasia, 2.2% metastasis to adrenals, and 3.8% other lesions of benign origin. Bilateral tumors were found in 11%, and compared to unilateral tumors, SCS was more prevalent. Only 2 cases were reclassified during follow-up, both as SCS, but neither had had a dexamethasone suppression test performed at initial work-up. In patients diagnosed with an adrenal metastasis, 92.9% were deceased within 2 years. Excluding those with malignant tumors, 12.9% of patients died during the study period of up to 11 years due to other causes than adrenal.Conclusion: Most AIs were benign, but a small fraction of tumors were functional and malignant. The prognosis of patients with adrenal metastasis was extremely poor, but otherwise, the mortality rate was similar to that for the general population. Follow-up of AIs <4 cm with an initial nonfunctional profile and benign radiologic appearance appears unwarranted, but screening for congenital adrenal hyperplasia should be considered.Abbreviations: 17OHP = 17-hydroxyprogesterone ACC = adrenal cortical carcinoma ACTH = adrenocorticotropic hormone AI = adrenal incidentaloma CAH = congenital adrenal hyperplasia CT = computed tomography CS = Cushing syndrome DST = dexamethasone suppression test HPA = hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis MRI = magnetic resonance imaging SCS = subclinical Cushing syndrome T2DM = type 2 diabetes mellitus UFC = urinary free cortisol     

Performance of Free Versus Total Cortisol Following Cosyntropin Stimulation Testing in an Outpatient Setting

Objective: Free cortisol (FC) is potentially superior to total cortisol (TC) measurements in selected clinical settings; however, the advantages of uniform use of FC in outpatient settings are unclear. The objectives of this study were to describe the dynamic response of FC during cosyntropin stimulation testing (CST) compared to TC and to determine the rates of discordance.Methods: This is a cross-sectional study of 295 stable patients who underwent CST in an outpatient Endocrine Testing Center. The main outcome measures were TC and FC measurements during CST.Results: The mean age of the 295 subjects was 49.1 (16.9) years. Of 218 females, 43 were taking estrogen therapy (ET) at the time of testing. Adrenal insufficiency (AI) was diagnosed in 41/295 (14%) patients. The FC concentrations were associated with TC concentrations at baseline (R² = 0.77, P<.001), 30 minutes (R² = 0.87, P<.001), and 60 minutes (R² = 0.90, P<.001). The FC cutoffs for AI were 873 and 1,170 ng/dL at 30 and 60 minutes, respectively. The FC had a more pronounced fold change from baseline to peak than TC (median 3.2 vs. 1.7, P<.001). Both TC and FC at baseline were higher in females on ET compared to those who were not and to males; however, peak TC and FC values were similar. In 3/43 females on ET, FC, and TC results were discordant (P = .003).Conclusion: We report 99% concordance of TC and FC measurements in a large outpatient cohort. The discordant rates were high in females treated with ET (7%). The FC measurements during CST in females on ET may provide a more rapid and accurate diagnosis of AI.Abbreviations:ACTH = adrenocorticotropic hormoneAI = adrenal insufficiencyCBG = corticosteroid-binding proteinCST = cosyntropin stimulation testingET = estrogen therapyFC = free cortisolfΔ = fold changeROC = receiver operating characteristicTC = total cortisol     

Changing to Basal-Bolus Insulin Therapy for the Inpatient Management of Hyperglycemia—A Natural Experiment

Objective: Most acute-care hospitals have transitioned from sliding-scale to basal-bolus insulin therapy to manage hyperglycemia during hospitalization, but there is limited scientific evidence demonstrating better short-term clinical outcomes using the latter approach. The present study sought to determine if using basal-bolus insulin therapy favorably affects these outcomes in noncritical care settings and, if so, whether the magnitude of benefit differs in patients with known versus newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes.Methods: This natural experiment compared outcomes in 10,120 non–critically ill adults with type 2 diabetes admitted to an academic teaching hospital before and after hospital-wide implementation of a basal-bolus insulin therapy protocol. A group of 30,271 inpatients without diabetes (type 1 or 2) served as controls. Binomial models were used to compare percentages of patients with type 2 diabetes who were transferred to intensive care, experienced complications, or died in the hospital before and after implementation of the protocol, controlling for changes in the control group. The analysis also evaluated before-after changes in length of stay and glucometric indicators.Results: Implementation of basal-bolus therapy did not reduce intensive care use (the primary outcome), complications, mortality, or median length of stay, except in patients with newly diagnosed diabetes (n = 234), who experienced a statistically significant decline in the incidence of complications (P<.01). The absence of effect in previously diagnosed patients was observed in spite of a 32% decline (from 3.7% to 2.5%) in the proportion of inpatient days with hypoglycemia <70 mg/dL (P<.01) and a 16% decline (from 13.5% to 11.3%) in the proportion of days with hyperglycemia >300 mg/dL (P<.01).Conclusion: Despite achieving significant reductions in both hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia, use of basal-bolus insulin therapy to manage hyperglycemia in non–critically ill hospitalized patients did not improve short-term clinical outcomes, except in the small minority of patients with newly diagnosed diabetes. The optimal management of hyperglycemia for improving these outcomes has yet to be determined.Abbreviation: ICD-9 = International Classification of Diseases–Ninth Revision