Serum Levels of Carcinoembryonic Antigen in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

Objective: To investigate whether serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels are associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c).Methods: A comparative, cross-sectional, observational study was conducted at Jordan University Hospital, Amman, Jordan, on 282 adult subjects from March 2012 to June 2015. Subjects were classified into 2 groups: T2DM subjects (n = 168) and a healthy comparison group (n = 114). Subjects with any condition known to be associated with elevated CEA levels were excluded. HbA1c and serum CEA levels were measured, and body mass index (BMI) was determined.Results: Subjects with T2DM had significantly higher mean serum CEA than controls (2.4 ± 1.5 vs. 1.5 ± 1.2 ng/mL, P<.0001). Sex did not correlate with CEA levels, while age (Spearman's rho [ρ] = 0.18, P =.002) and HbA1c (ρ = 0.56, P<.0001) did; however, age no longer correlated after correcting for diabetic status. HbA1c was the only variable shown to correlate with CEA in a stepwise linear regression (r = 0.37, P<.001).Conclusion: We observed a statistically significant association between elevated CEA and T2DM, despite average CEA values for both groups being within the reference range. In addition, serum CEA levels correlated positively with HbA1c values.Abbreviations:ADA = American Diabetes AssociationBMI = body mass indexCA 19-9 = carbohydrate antigen 19-9CEA = carcinoembryonic antigenCRP = C-reactive proteinDM = diabetes mellitusHbA1c = glycated hemoglobinJUH = Jordan University HospitalT2DM = type 2 diabetes mellitusρ = Spearman's correlation coefficient     

Diabetic Retinopathy,Classified Using the Lesion-Aware Deep Learning System,Predicts Diabetic End-Stage Renal Disease in Chinese Patients

Objective: To characterize the relationship between diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetic nephropathy (DN) in Chinese patients and to determine whether the severity of DR predicts end-stage renal disease (ESRD).Methods: Bilateral fundic photographs of 91 Chinese type 2 diabetic patients with biopsy-confirmed DN, not in ESRD stage, were obtained at the time of renal biopsy in this longitudinal study. The baseline severity of DR was determined using the Lesion-aware Deep Learning System (RetinalNET) in an open framework for deep learning and was graded using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study severity scale. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) for the effect of the severity of diabetic retinopathy on ESRD.Results: During a median follow-up of 15 months, 25 patients progressed to ESRD. The severity of retinopathy at the time of biopsy was a prognostic factor for progression to ESRD (HR 2.18, 95% confidence interval 1.05 to 4.53, P = .04). At baseline, more severe retinopathy was associated with poor renal function, and more severe glomerular lesions. However, 30% of patients with mild retinopathy and severe glomerular lesions had higher low-density lipo-protein-cholesterol and more severe proteinuria than those with mild glomerular lesions. Additionally, 3% of patients with severe retinopathy and mild glomerular changes were more likely to have had diabetes a long time than those with severe glomerular lesions.Conclusion: Although the severity of DR predicted diabetic ESRD in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and DN, the severities of DR and DN were not always consistent, especially in patients with mild retinopathy or microalbuminuria.Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; DM = diabetic mellitus; DN = diabetic nephropathy; DR = diabetic retinopathy; eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate; ESRD = end-stage renal disease; HbA1c = hemoglobin A1c; HR = hazard ratio; NPDR = nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy; PDR = proliferative diabetic retinopathy; SBP = systolic blood pressure; T2DM = type 2 diabetes mellitus; VEGF = vascular endothelial growth factor     

Hba1C Control And Cost-Effectiveness in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Initiated On Canagliflozin or A Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonist in A Real-World Setting

Objective: To compare glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) control and medication costs between patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) treated with canagliflozin 300 mg (CANA) or a glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) in a real-world setting.Methods: Adults with T2DM newly initiated on CANA or a GLP-1 RA (index date) were identified from IQVIA™ Real-World Data Electronic Medical Records U.S. database (March 29, 2012–April 30, 2016). Inverse probability of treatment weighting accounted for differences in baseline characteristics. HbA1c levels at 3-month intervals were compared using generalized estimating equations. Medication costs used wholesale acquisition costs.Results: For both cohorts (CANA: n = 11,435; GLP-1 RA: n = 11,582), HbA1c levels decreased at 3 months postindex and remained lower through 30 months. Absolute changes in mean HbA1c from index to 3 months postindex for CANA and GLP-1 RA were -1.16% and -1.21% (patients with baseline HbA1c ≥7% &lsqb;53 mmol/mol]); -1.54% and -1.51% (patients with baseline HbA1c ≥8% &lsqb;64 mmol/mol]); and -2.13% and -1.99% (patients with baseline HbA1c ≥9% &lsqb;75 mmol/mol]), respectively. Postindex, CANA patients with baseline HbA1c ≥7% had similar HbA1c levels at each interval versus GLP-1 RA patients, except 9 months (mean HbA1c, 7.75% &lsqb;61 mmol/mol] vs. 7.86% &lsqb;62 mmol/mol]; P = .0305). CANA patients with baseline HbA1c ≥8% and ≥9% had consistently lower HbA1c numerically versus GLP-1 RA patients and statistically lower HbA1c at 9 (baseline HbA1c ≥8% or ≥9%), 27, and 30 months (baseline HbA1c ≥9%). Continuous 12-month medication cost $3,326 less for CANA versus GLP-1 RA.Conclusion: This retrospective study demonstrated a similar evolution of HbA1c levels among CANA and GLP-1 RA patients in a real-world setting. Lower medication costs suggest CANA is economically dominant over GLP-1 RA (similar effectiveness, lower cost).Abbreviations:AHA = antihyperglycemic agentBMI = body mass indexCANA = canagliflozin 300 mgDCSI = diabetes complications severity indexeGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rateEMR = electronic medical recordGLP-1 RA = glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonistHbA1c = glycated hemoglobinICD-9-CM = International Classification of Diseases–Ninth Revision–Clinical ModificationICD-10-CM = International Classification of Diseases–Tenth Revision–Clinical ModificationIPTW = inverse probability of treatment weightingITT = intent-to-treatMPR = medication possession ratioPDC = proportion of days coveredPS = propensity scorePSM = propensity score matchingQuan-CCI = Quan-Charlson comorbidity indexSGLT2 = sodium-glucose cotransporter 2T2DM = type 2 diabetes mellitusWAC = wholesale acquisition cost     

Vascular Complications in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Prevalence and Comorbidities in 6 Countries of Latin America (A Cohort of the Discover Study Program)

Objective: To provide real world observational data about glucose control, the burden of diabetes, comorbidities, and cardiovascular risk factors among patients initiating second-line therapy in Latin America (LA).Methods: This report is a cross-sectional analysis of the LA cohort of the DISCOVER study, describing the regional prevalence of microvascular and macrovascular complications in Mexico, Costa Rica, Panama, Colombia, Argentina, and Brazil.Results: One thousand six hundred and sixteen patients were included in 69 investigational sites. Hemoglobin A1c was >7% (42 mmol/mol) in 81.3% of subjects. Macrovascular complications were reported by 13.8% of the subjects. Microvascular conditions were reported in 15.2% of the subjects. The prevalence of hypertension and of hyperlipidemia was 55.5% and 45.9%, respectively. Blood pressure, total cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein were out of target levels in 38.5%, 51.2%, and 81.7% of the patients, respectively. Overweight or obesity was reported in 83.8% of the cases.Conclusion: Our study shows that patients with type 2 diabetes in LA are not reaching their glucose, lipids, blood pressure, and weight targets. The prevalence of microvascular (15.2%), macrovascular (13.8%), and uncontrolled comorbidities in patients at an early stage of the disease (initiating a second-line therapy) highlights the need for more aggressive risk factor screening as well as treatment in LA.Abbreviations: CV = cardiovascular; CVD = cardiovascular disease; DM = diabetes mellitus; HbA1c = hemoglobin A1c; LA = Latin America/Latin American; LDL = low density cholesterol; T2DM = type 2 diabetes mellitus     

The Clinical And Metabolic Characteristics Of Young-Onset Ketosis-Prone Type 2 Diabetes In China

Objective: To investigate the prevalence and clinical characteristics of ketosis-prone type 2 diabetes (KPD) in Chinese patients with young-onset diabetes.Methods: A total of 238 young diabetic patients were recruited from our inpatient department from January 1, 2012, to December 28, 2014. KPD was defined as diabetes without precipitating illness and with the presence of ketosis or diabetic ketoacidosis in the absence of autoantibodies at the time of diagnosis. We reviewed the clinical characteristics and disease progression of this group of patients.Results: Eighteen patients fulfilled the criteria for KPD, and the prevalence of patients with KPD was 7.6%. The mean (SD) age of the KPD group at the time of diagnosis of diabetes was 27.6 (4.85) years, and these patients were predominantly male (male to female ratio, 8:1) and had a high proportion of obesity and new-onset diabetes and a strong family history of diabetes. β-Cell function in the KPD group was intermediate between type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Patients with KPD had the highest levels of glycated hemoglobin, triglycerides, total cholesterol, and free fatty acids and the lowest levels of high-density lipoprotein. After 3 to 12 months of follow-up, 17 of 18 patients with KPD (94.4%) were able to discontinue insulin therapy, and 11 patients (61.1%) were managed with diet or exercise alone.Conclusion: KPD patients accounted for 7.6% of the diabetic patients requiring admission to a large urban hospital in China, with an age of onset of diabetes of ≤35 years. These patients are more likely to be male, have abnormal lipid metabolism, and have more reversible β-cell dysfunction.Abbreviations:BMI = body mass indexDKA = diabetic ketoacidosisGAD 65 = glutamate decarboxylase 65HbA _1c = glycated hemoglobinICAs = islet-cell antibodiesKPD = ketosis-prone type 2 diabetes mellitusLADA = latent autoimmune diabetes in an adultMIDD = maternally inherited diabetes and deafnessMODY = maturityonset diabetes of the youngT1DM = type 1 diabetes mellitusT2DM = type 2 diabetes mellitus     

The Association of Decreased Serum Gdnf Level with Hyperglycemia and Depression in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Objective: Comorbidity of diabetes and depression is a critical problem. Decreased glial-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) has been demonstrated in depression, but no evidence of a relationship between GDNF and diabetes has been shown. The present studies were designed to investigate the relationship between GDNF and metabolism.Methods: In Study 1, we performed a case-control study in which subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), prediabetes (p-DM), and normal glucose tolerance (NGT) were included. In Study 2, we performed a cross-sectional study in 296 patients having pre-existing diabetes in whom the levels of serum GDNF, blood glucose, blood lipids, blood pressure, body mass index, scores from the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), the EuroQol-5 scale, and the diabetes distress scale were measured, as well as single-nucleotide polymorphisms of GDNF including rs884344, rs3812047, and rs2075680.Results: In Study 1, serum GDNF concentration was significantly lower in the T2DM group than in the NGT group (NGT: 11.706 ± 3.918 pg/mL; p-DM: 10.736 ± 3.722 pg/mL; type 2 diabetes mellitus &lsqb;T2DM group]: 9.884 ± 2.804 pg/mL, P = .008). In Study 2, significantly decreased serum GDNF levels were observed in subjects with poor glycemic control or depression (glycated hemoglobin &lsqb;HbA1c] <7.0% without depression: 11.524 ± 2.903 pg/mL; HbA1c ≥7.0% without depression: 10.625 ± 2.577 pg/mL; HbA1c <7.0% with depression: 10.355 ± 2.432 pg/mL; HbA1c ≥7.0% with depression: 8.824 ± 2.102 pg/mL, P = .008). Double-factor variance analysis showed that glycemic control and depression were independent factors for the GDNF level. Moreover, the serum GDNF level was significantly inversely associated with the fasting plasma glucose, 2 hours postprandial plasma glucose, HbA1c, and PHQ-9 score.Conclusion: Glycemic dysregulation was an independent factor for the GDNF level. These findings suggest that GDNF level might be involved in the pathophysiology of T2DM and depression through various pathways.Abbreviations: BP = blood pressure; CHO = cholesterol; DDS = diabetes distress scale; DM = diabetes mellitus; EQ-5D = the health-related dimensions of the EuroQol-5 scale; FPG = fasting plasma glucose; GDNF = glial-derived neurotrophic factor; HbA1c = glycated hemoglobin; HDL = high-density lipoprotein; LDL = low-density lipoprotein; NGT = normal glucose tolerance; PHQ-9 = Patient Health Questionnaire; p-DM = prediabetes; PPG = postprandial plasma glucose; SNP = single-nucleotide polymorphism; T2DM = type 2 diabetes mellitus; TG = triglyceride     

SGLT-2 Inhibitor Therapy Added to GLP-1 Agonist Therapy in the Management of T2DM

Objective: To assess the real-world efficacy and safety of canagliflozin therapy added to type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients who have received a minimum 1 year of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonist therapy.Methods: This pre-post observational study assessed the efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in a group of T2DM patients from a community endocrinology practice who received GLP-1 agonist therapy for a minimum of 12 months. The primary study outcome was change in mean glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level from baseline. Secondary endpoints included changes in average weight, and comparison of the percentage of patients obtaining an HbA1c <7%.Results: A total of 75 patients met all the study criteria. Baseline patient characteristics were as follows: average age, 58 ± 9 years; mean duration of T2DM, 14 ± 6 years; 56% male; 92% Caucasian; baseline body mass index (BMI), 39.4 ± 9.4 kg/m²; and mean baseline HbA1c, 7.94 ± 0.69%. HbA1c and weight were significantly reduced by 0.39% and 4.6 kg, respectively. Adverse effects were reported by 13 (17.3%) patients, including 4 (5.3%) who discontinued canagliflozin because of adverse reactions.Conclusion: Canagliflozin was generally well tolerated and significantly further reduced mean HbA1c levels and body weight in patients with T2DM when added to GLP-1 regimen.Abbreviations:BP = blood pressureBUN = blood urea nitrogenCANTATA = Canagliflozin Treatment and Trial AnalysisDBP = diastolic blood pressureDKA = diabetic ketoacidosisDPP-4 = dipeptidyl peptidase-4EMR = electronic medical recordFDA = Food and Drug AdministrationGFR = glomerular filtration rateGLP-1 = glucagon-like peptide-1HbA1c = glycated hemoglobinHDL-C = high-density lipoprotein cholesterolLDL-C = low-density lipoprotein cholesterolSCr = serum creatinineSGLT-2 = sodium glucose cotransporter 2T2DM = type 2 diabetes mellitusTZD = thiazolidinedioneUTI = urinary tract infection     

Patient Perspectives on Obesity Management: Need for Greater Discussion of BMI and Weight-Loss Options Beyond Diet and Exercise,Especially in Patients With Diabetes

Objective: To identify perceptions of obesity management in patients with and without diabetes.Methods: A 48-question survey was administered in 2018 to our Endocrinology Clinic's adult patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m². Chi-squared or Fisher's exact tests were used to compare variables between groups.Results: Of 146 respondents, 105 had diabetes and 41 did not. Most respondents were female (61.4%), African American (66.4%), and with an income <$50,000 (58.6%). Those with diabetes had significantly greater comorbidities of hypertension, high cholesterol, and arthritis. Over 90% in both groups agreed that obesity is related to hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, and early death. Only 48% were aware of their BMI, and only 30.5% with diabetes and 41.5% without diabetes perceived themselves to be obese. Over 60% in each group reported discussion of diet and exercise with their providers, whereas few in both groups reported referral to a formal weight-loss program (18.9%) or to a specialty that manages obesity (4.2%), or discussion of anti-obesity medications (11.2%) or bariatric surgery (8.4%). Reported concerns with anti-obesity medications and bariatric surgery included lack of knowledge and side effects or complications.Conclusion: These findings revealed excellent patient awareness of obesity as a health problem but misperception of obese status and unawareness of BMI. Presence of diabetes and other comorbidities did not result in greater discussion of weight-loss methods beyond diet and exercise. Increased patient education and discussion of specific weight-loss services, anti-obesity medications, and bariatric surgery are needed.Abbreviations: BMI = body mass index; DM = diabetes mellitus; HbA1c = hemoglobin A1c; HCP = healthcare provider     

De-Intensification of Diabetes Treatment in Elderly Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Objective: De-intensification of diabetes treatment is recommended in elderly patients with tight glycemic control at high risk of hypoglycemia. However, rates of de-intensification in endocrine practice are unknown. We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the rate of de-intensification of antidiabetic treatment in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and tight glycemic control.Methods: All patients with ≥2 clinic visits over a 1-year period at a major academic diabetes center were included. De-intensification of diabetes treatment was defined as a decrease or discontinuation of any antidiabetic drug without adding another drug, or a reduction in the total daily dose of insulin or a sulfonylurea drug with or without adding a drug without risk of hypoglycemia.Results: Out of 3,186 unique patients, 492 were ≥65 years old with T2DM and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) <7.5% (<58 mmol/mol). We found 308 patients treated with a sulfonylurea drug or insulin, 102 of whom had hypoglycemia as per physician note. Among these 102 patients, 38 (37%) were advised to de-intensify therapy. In a subgroup analysis of patients ≥75 years old with HbA1c <7% (<53 mmol/mol), we found that out of 23 patients treated with a sulfonylurea drug or insulin and reporting hypoglycemia, 11 (43%) were advised de-intensification of therapy. There were no significant predictors of de-intensification of treatment.Conclusion: Our study suggests that de-intensification of antidiabetic medications is uncommon in elderly patients with T2DM. Strategies may need to be developed to prevent the potential harm of overtreatment in this population.Abbreviations: ADA = American Diabetes Association; CGM = continuous glucose monitoring; HbA1c = hemoglobin A1c; T2DM = type 2 diabetes mellitus; UKPDS = United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study     

The Association of Serum Bilirubin on Kidney Clinicopathologic Features and Renal Outcome in Patients with Diabetic Nephropathy: A Biopsy-Based Study

Objective: To explore the relationship between serum bilirubin concentration and clinicopathologic features and renal outcome in biopsy-diagnosed diabetic nephropathy (DN) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.Methods: In this retrospective study, 118 patients with DN were enrolled. Participants were divided into two groups according to their median baseline serum bilirubin concentration: Group 1 (serum bilirubin ≤7.5 μmol /L); Group 2 (serum bilirubin >7.5 μmol /L). Basic clinical parameters were measured at the time of renal biopsy, and the relationships between serum bilirubin and the clinicopathologic features and renal outcome were analyzed.Results: Patients in Group 1 often had inferior renal function. Compared with Group 2, the glomerular classification and interstitial inflammation were more severe in subjects of Group 1, while arteriolar hyalinosis and interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA) were comparable between the groups. Serum bilirubin was negatively correlated with the severity of the glomerular classification, interstitial inflammation, and IFTA. In the prognostic analysis, higher serum bilirubin level was associated with a lower risk of progression to end-stage renal disease, which was independent of the effects of age, gender, duration of diabetes, anemia, serum glucose, and hypertension but not of estimated glomerular filtration rate (hazard ratio, 0.406; 95% confidence interval, 0.074 to 2.225; P = .299).Conclusion: Our study showed a negative correlation between serum bilirubin level and renal pathologic lesions in patients with DN; serum bilirubin showed an inverse association with DN progression, but this was not independent.Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; CKD = chronic kidney disease; DM = diabetes mellitus; DN = diabetic nephropathy; DR = diabetic retinopathy; eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate; ESRD = end-stage renal disease; HbA1c = glycated hemoglobin; HO-1 = heme oxygenase 1; HR = hazard ratio; IFTA = interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy; log-BIL = log-transformed baseline serum bilirubin; T2DM = type 2 diabetes mellitus     

The Impact of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists on Patients with Diabetes on Insulin Therapy

Objective: The clinical benefit of adding a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) to basal-bolus or very high dose insulin regimens is unclear. This study investigated the impact of adding a GLP-1RA to a spectrum of insulin regimens (basal, basal-bolus, and U-500) to determine the impact on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), weight loss, and total daily insulin dose (TDD) over the course of 12 months.Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on 113 participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus using insulin therapy. Each participant's HbA1c, body weight, and TDD were recorded prior to initiation of GLP-1RA therapy and at the 3, 6, and 12-month time points while on combination therapy.Results: Across all participants, the HbA1c values decreased significantly from a baseline of 8.9 (74 mmol/mol) ± 0.14% to 8.2 (66 mmol/mol) ± 0.14% (P<.01) in the first 3 months, 8.0 (64 mmol/mol) ± 0.12% (P<.01) at 6 months, to 8.3 (67 mmol/mol) ± 0.14% (P<.01) at 12 months. There was no significant decrease in weight or TDD with the addition of a GLP-1RA overall or in different insulin groups. However, there was a clinically significant decrease in weight over the study duration.Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that adding a GLP-1RA to various insulin regimens may help to achieve glycemic goals while avoiding the less desirable side effects of weight gain and increasing insulin regimens. However, the expected weight loss and decrease in TDD may not be as sizable in the clinical setting.Abbreviations: DCOE = Diabetes Center of Excellence; DM = diabetes mellitus; GLP-1RA = glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist; HbA1c = hemoglobin A1c; RCT = randomized controlled trial; TDD = total daily dose     

Effect of Gluten-FREE Diet on Metabolic Control and Anthropometric Parameters in Type 1 Diabetes with Subclinical Celiac Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Objective: It is unclear whether the institution of gluten-free diet (GFD) is beneficial in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1DM) and subclinical celiac disease (CD). Our primary objective was to evaluate the effect of GFD on the frequency of hypoglycemia, in patients with T1DM and subclinical CD. Our secondary objective was to investigate the effect of GFD on height, weight, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), insulin dose requirement, and bone mineral homeostasis.Methods: We carried out a prospective open label randomized controlled trial (RCT). Patients with T1DM and subclinical CD were randomized to receive GFD or a normal diet for 1 year. The primary outcome was the frequency of hypoglycemic episodes (blood glucose <70 mg/dL) measured by self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) at the sixth month of the study in the 2 groups.Results: Screening for CD was carried out in 320 T1DM patients. Thirty eligible patients were randomized to receive GFD (n = 15) or a normal diet (n = 15). The mean number of hypoglycemic episodes/month recorded by SMBG and the mean time spent in hypoglycemia measured by CGM (minutes) in the GFD group versus the non-GFD group at six months was 2.3 minutes versus 3.4 minutes (P = .5) and 124.1 minutes versus 356.9 minutes (P = .1), respectively. The mean number of hypoglycemic episodes/month significantly declined in the GFD group (3.5 episodes at baseline versus 2.3 episodes at the sixth month; P = .03). The mean HbA1c declined by 0.73% in the GFD group and rose by 0.99% in non-GFD group at study completion.Conclusion: This is the first RCT to assess the effect of GFD in T1DM and subclinical CD. A trend towards a decrease in hypoglycemic episodes and better glycemic control was seen in patients receiving GFD.Abbreviations: BMC = bone mineral content; BMI = body mass index; CD = celiac disease; CGM = continuous glucose monitoring; GFD = gluten-free diet; Hb = hemoglobin; HbA1c = glycosylated hemoglobin; iPTH = intact parathyroid hormone; RCT = randomized controlled trial; SMBG = self-monitoring of blood glucose; T1DM = type 1 diabetes mellitus; tTG-IgA = tissue transglutaminase immunoglobulin A     

Integrated Insulin Pump and Continuous Glucose Monitoring Technology in Diabetes Care Today: A Perspective of Real-Life Experience With the Minimed™ 670G Hybrid Closed-Loop System

Objective: Intensive glucose management with insulin pump and continuous glucose monitoring therapy in insulin-treated patients with diabetes poses many challenges in all aspects of daily life. Automated insulin delivery (AID) is the ultimate goal of insulin replacement therapy to reduce the burden of managing this condition. Many systems are being tested in the clinical research setting, and one hybrid closed-loop (HCL) system has received Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for use in type 1 diabetes patients above the age of 14 years.Methods: Literature review and clinical practice experience from the Diabetes and Technology Program at an academic medical center.Results: This review outlines recent advances in AID systems, focusing on the FDA-approved MiniMed™ 670G HCL system and the real-life experience 1-year post-release in an academic medical center with over 60 patients on this system. The unique challenges of adapting to this new system outside the clinical trial setting are highlighted, and a training protocol designed specifically for the onboarding of first-time users is described.Conclusion: HCL insulin therapy offers several advantages, at the same time posing unique challenges to the user. Systematic training of patients with diabetes transitioning to this system is essential for retention and success of use.Abbreviations: AID = automated insulin delivery; CGM = continuous glucose monitoring; FDA = Food and Drug Administration; HbA1c = glycated hemoglobin; HCL = hybrid closed-loop; ICR = insulin to carbohydrate ratio; SAP = sensor augmented pump; T1DM = type 1 diabetes     

Impact of Weight loss Trajectory Following Randomization to Bariatric Surgery on Long-Term Diabetes Glycemic and Cardiometabolic Parameters

Objective: It is unclear whether acute weight loss or the chronic trajectory of weight loss after bariatric surgery is associated with long-term type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) glycemic improvement. This ancillary study of the Surgical Treatment and Medications Potentially Eradicate Diabetes Efficiently (STAMPEDE) trial aimed to answer this question.Methods: In STAMPEDE, 150 patients with T2DM were randomized to bariatric surgery, and 96 had 5-year follow-up. Data post–Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB, n = 49) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG, n = 47) were analyzed. We defined percent weight loss in the first year as negative percent decrease from baseline weight to lowest weight in the first year. Percent weight regain was positive percent change from lowest weight in the first year to fifth year. Weight change was then correlated with cardiometabolic (CM) and glycemic outcomes at 5 years using Spearman rank correlations and multivariate analysis.Results: In both RYGB and SG, less weight loss in the first year positively correlated with higher 5-year glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (RYGB, β = +0.13; P<.001 and SG, β = 0.14; P<.001). In SG, greater weight regain from nadir positively correlated with higher HbA1c (β = 0.06; P = .02), but not in RYGB. Reduced first-year weight loss was also correlated with increased 5-year triglycerides (β = 1.81; P = .01), but not systolic blood pressure. Weight regain did not correlate with CM outcomes.Conclusion: Acute weight loss may be more important for T2DM glycemic control following both RYGB and SG as compared with weight regain. Clinicians should aim to assist patients with achieving maximal weight loss in the first year post-op to maximize long-term health of patients.Abbreviations: BMI = body mass index; HbA1c = glycated hemoglobin; RYGB = Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; SBP = systolic blood pressure; SG = sleeve gastrectomy; STAMPEDE = Surgical Treatment and Medications Potentially Eradicate Diabetes Efficiently; T2DM = type 2 diabetes mellitus; TG = triglyceride     

Impact of Switching Youth With Diabetes to Insulin Degludec in Clinical Practice

Objective: Many youth with diabetes struggle to meet glycemic targets. The new ultralong duration of action of insulin degludec (iDeg) holds potential to ameliorate missed doses of basal insulin and improve glycemic control in youth with diabetes.Methods: A retrospective chart review was undertaken of youth age 13 to <24 years in our practice with type 1 diabetes (T1D) or type 2 diabetes (T2D) who had been switched from glargine or detemir to iDeg to evaluate the impact of this transition on glycemic control.Results: Glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in youth with T1D (n = 82) remained stable during 6 months of treatment with iDeg (10.1 ± 2.11% &lsqb;87 ± 23 mmol/mol] at start of iDeg compared to 10.1 ± 2.12% &lsqb;87 ± 23 mmol/mol] at 6 months of treatment), whereas in youth with T2D (n = 16), HbA1c significantly declined from 10.6 ± 2.3% (92 ± 25 mmol/mol) to 8.3 ± 2.2% (67 ± 24 mmol/mol) (P = .0024).Conclusion: In youth switched to iDeg, which in our practice is commonly due to ineffectiveness of the patient's current regimen, the outcome differences we saw may be due to preserved beta-cell function in youth with T2D. It remains to be seen whether there are benefits of transition to iDeg in youth with T1D beyond glycemic outcomes, such as reduction in ketosis and episodes of diabetic ketoacidosis.Abbreviations: DKA = diabetic ketoacidosis; DPV = Diabetes-Patienten-Verlaufsdokumentation (German/Austrian Prospective Diabetes Follow-Up Registry); HbA1c = glycated hemoglobin A1c; iDeg = insulin degludec; T1D = type 1 diabetes; T2D = type 2 diabetes     

The Efficacy and Safety of Co-Administration of Sitagliptin With Metformin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes at Hospital Discharge

Objective: Few randomized controlled trials have focused on the optimal management of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) during the transition from the inpatient to outpatient setting. This multicenter open-label study explored a discharge strategy based on admission hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) to guide therapy in general medicine and surgery patients with T2D.Methods: Patients with HbA1c ≤7% (53 mmol/mol) were discharged on sitagliptin and metformin; patients with HbA1c between 7 and 9% (53–75 mmol/mol) and those >9% (75 mmol/mol) were discharged on sitagliptinmetformin with glargine U-100 at 50% or 80% of the hospital daily dose. The primary outcome was change in HbA1c at 3 and 6 months after discharge.Results: Mean HbA1c on admission for the entire cohort (N = 253) was 8.70 ± 2.3% and decreased to 7.30 ± 1.5% and 7.30 ± 1.7% at 3 and 6 months (P<.001). Patients with HbA1c <7% went from 6.3 ± 0.5% to 6.3 ± 0.80% and 6.2 ± 1.0% at 3 and 6 months. Patients with HbA1c between 7 and 9% had a reduction from 8.0 ± 0.6% to 7.3 ± 1.1% and 7.3 ± 1.3%, and those with HbA1c >9% from 11.3 ± 1.7% to 8.0 ± 1.8% and 8.0 ± 2.0% at 3 and 6 months after discharge (both P<.001). Clinically significant hypoglycemia (<54 mg/dL) was observed in 4%, 4%, and 7% among patients with a HbA1c <7%, 7 to 9%, and >9%, while a glucose <40 mg/dL was reported in <1% in all groups.Conclusion: The proposed HbA1c-based hospital discharge algorithm using a combination of sitagliptin-metformin was safe and significantly improved glycemic control after hospital discharge in general medicine and surgery patients with T2D.Abbreviations: BG = blood glucose; DPP-4 = dipeptidyl peptidase-4; eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate; HbA1c = hemoglobin A1c; T2D = type 2 diabetes     

Potential Place of SGLT2 Inhibitors in Treatment Paradigms for type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Objective: Following the first Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in 2013, sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have generated much interest among physicians treating patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Here, the role in treatment with this drug class is considered in the context of T2DM treatment paradigms.Methods: The clinical trials for the SGLT2 inhibitors are examined with a focus on canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, and empagliflozin.Results: Evidence from clinical trials in patients with T2DM supports the use of SGLT2 inhibitors either as monotherapy or in addition to other glucose-lowering treatments as adjuncts to diet and exercise, and we have gained significant clinical experience in a relatively short time.Conclusion: The drugs appear to be useful in a variety of T2DM populations, contingent primarily on renal function. Most obviously, SGLT2 inhibitors appear to be well suited for patients with potential for hypoglycemia or weight gain. In clinical trials, patients treated with SGLT2 inhibitors have experienced moderate weight loss and a low risk of hypoglycemic events except when used in combination with an insulin secretagogue. In addition, SGLT2 inhibitors have been shown to reduce blood pressure, so they may be beneficial in patients with T2DM complicated by hypertension. SGLT2 inhibitors were incorporated into the 2015 American Diabetes Association (ADA)/European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) position statement on the management of hyperglycemia and received an even more prominent position in the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE)/American College of Endocrinology (ACE) comprehensive diabetes management guidelines and algorithm.Abbreviations: AE = adverse event A1C = glycated hemoglobin CI = confidence interval CKD = chronic kidney disease DKA = diabetic ketoacidosis DPP-4 = dipeptidyl peptidase 4 eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate FDA = Food and Drug Administration FPG = fasting plasma glucose GLP-1 = glucagon-like peptide 1 HDL-C = high-density lipoprotein cholesterol HR = hazard ratio LADA = late-onset autoimmune diabetes of adulthood LDL-C = low-density lipoprotein cholesterol MACE = major adverse cardiovascular events SGLT1 = sodium glucose cotransporter 1 SGLT2 = sodium glucose cotransporter 2 T1DM = type 1 diabetes mellitus T2DM = type 2 diabetes mellitus UACR = urine albumin to creatinine ratio     

Differences in Achieving Hba1C Goals Among Patients Seen by Endocrinologists and Primary Care Providers

Objective: This study evaluated whether there is a difference in the proportion of patients with type 2 diabetes who achieve a hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) <7% within one year following treatment by an endocrinologist or primary care physician (PCP).Methods: We conducted a retrospective, propensity-matched study of patients with type 2 diabetes that were not optimally controlled and seen within our health system from 2007–2016. We assessed differences in short term health outcomes for patients following an endocrinologist visit compared to a PCP visit.Results: Patients seen by endocrinologists obtained HbA1c control at a faster rate (hazard ratio = 1.226; 95% confidence interval = 1.01 to 1.488) than those seen by a PCP. Furthermore, 34.5% and 29.5% of those treated by endocrinologists and PCPs, respectively, obtained HbA1c control by one year. Endocrinologists were more likely to prescribe a new medication class within 90 days than PCPs (14.1% versus 10.3%, respectively, P = .043). There was no difference in the risk of hospitalization between groups; 24.4% and 24.1% of those treated by endocrinologists and PCPs, respectively, were hospitalized within one year.Conclusion: Patients treated by endocrinology specialists were more likely to achieve a target HbA1c of <7% (53 mmol/mol) than those treated by PCPs in our health-care system. The performance difference may be partially explained by a higher rate of adding new classes of diabetes medications to the patient's pharmacologic regimens within 90 days by endocrinologists compared with PCPs. The long-term impact of these differences is unknown but has the potential to have an unfavorable impact on the health of the population.Abbreviations: ACP = American College of Physicians; CI = confidence interval; DUHS = Duke University Health System; HbA1c = hemoglobin A1c; HR = hazard ratio; PCP = primary care physician; SMD = standard mean difference     

Opportunistic Screening For Diabetes And Prediabetes Using Hemoglobin A1C In An Urban Primary Care Setting

Objective: In 2010, the American Diabetes Association (ADA) endorsed hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) as 1 of 3 tests for diabetes and prediabetes screening. We describe the use of HbA1c testing for screening during routine visits in primary care clinics of an urban health care system in the U.S.Methods: In 2013 to 2014, retrospective analyses of deidentified electronic health records over a 2-year period, January 2010 to December 2011, for academic private practices (clinic group 1) and federally-qualified Community Health Centers (clinic group 2) identified 11,885 adults without prior diabetes or recent HbA1c testing. We estimated the proportion of patients eligible for screening according to ADA and U.S. Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines and calculated the potential yield of previously undiagnosed diabetes or prediabetes among those who received at least 1 HbA1c test.Results: Overall, 3,316 and 5,613 patients of clinic groups 1 and 2 (75.2% of each) were eligible for screening by ADA guidelines, while only 1,764 (39.9%) of clinic group 1 and 3,799 (50.9%) of clinic group 2 were eligible by USPSTF guidelines. In those eligible by either guideline, 731 (21.4%) patients of clinic group 1 and 1,293 (21.5%) of clinic group 2 received HbA1c testing; among these, in 71 (9.7%) and 121 (9.4%) patients from clinic groups 1 and 2, respectively, HbA1c results were in the diabetes range, and in 330 (45.2%) and 733 (56.7%), results were in the prediabetes range.Conclusion: In urban primary care settings, appropriate HbA1c testing could result in the detection of a substantial number of previously undiagnosed diabetes and prediabetes cases needing treatment.Abbreviations:ADA = American Diabetes AssociationBMI = body mass indexCI = confidence intervalEHR = electronic health recordHbA1c = hemoglobin A1cHTN = hypertensionICD = International Classification of DiseasesIFCC = International Federation of Clinical ChemistryOGTT = oral glucose tolerance testUSPSTF = U.S. Preventative Services Task Force     

Efficacy and Safety of Dulaglutide in Hispanic/Latino Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in the Award Clinical Program

Objective: The aim of this post hoc analysis was to assess the efficacy and safety of once-weekly dulaglutide in Hispanic/Latino patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in phase 3 AWARD trials 1 to 6.Methods: Hispanic/Latino data at Week 26 were pooled across studies for each dulaglutide dose to analyze the change from baseline in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), percent to HbA1c goal, and adverse events (AEs). Change from baseline in HbA1c, change from baseline in weight and hypoglycemia were analyzed by Hispanic/Latino and non-Hispanic/Latino subgroups for each study.Results: Of the 3,136 patients randomized to dulaglutide 1.5 or 0.75 mg, 949 were reported as having Hispanic/Latino ethnicity. Baseline characteristics were similar for Hispanic/Latino and overall populations, except there were slightly more Hispanic/Latino females and weight was slightly lower for Hispanic/Latino patients. Hispanic/Latino patients receiving dulaglutide 1.5 mg had a reduction in HbA1c of 1.25% (95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.35, -1.15); dulaglutide 0.75 mg had a reduction of 1.07% (95% CI: -1.18, -0.96). Reductions in HbA1c and percent to goal HbA1c <7% and ≤6.5% were similar between Hispanic/Latino patients and the overall population. Weight change and hypoglycemia were similar between Hispanic/Latino and non-Hispanic/Latino subgroups for all studies. Treatment-emergent AEs were consistent with the overall population.Conclusion: Dulaglutide improved glycemic control with the potential for weight loss in Hispanic/Latino patients with T2D. Dulaglutide was well tolerated and had a low risk of hypoglycemia when used without insulin secretagogues or insulin. In the Hispanic/Latino population, dulaglutide efficacy and safety was consistent with that of the overall population.Abbreviations:AE = adverse eventAWARD = Assessment of Weekly AdministRation of dulaglutide in DiabetesBID = twice dailyCARMELA = The Cardiovascular Risk Factor Multiple Evaluation of Latin AmericaCI = confidence intervalGLP-1 RA = glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonistHbA1c = glycosylated hemoglobinT2D = type 2 diabetes