The JmjC domain protein Epe1 prevents unregulated assembly and disassembly of heterochromatin

Heterochromatin normally has prescribed chromosomal positions and must not encroach on adjacent regions. We demonstrate that the fission yeast protein Epe1 stabilises silent chromatin, preventing the oscillation of heterochromatin domains. Epe1 loss leads to two contrasting phenotypes: alleviation of silencing within heterochromatin and expansion of silent chromatin into neighbouring euchromatin. Thus, we propose that Epe1 regulates heterochromatin assembly and disassembly, thereby affecting heterochromatin integrity, centromere function and chromosome segregation fidelity. Epe1 regulates the extent of heterochromatin domains at the level of chromatin, not via the RNAi pathway. Analysis of an ectopically silenced site suggests that heterochromatin oscillation occurs in the absence of heterochromatin boundaries. Epe1 requires predicted iron- and 2-oxyglutarate (2-OG)-binding residues for in vivo function, indicating that it is probably a 2-OG/Fe(II)-dependent dioxygenase. We suggest that, rather than being a histone demethylase, Epe1 may be a protein hydroxylase that affects the stability of a heterochromatin protein, or protein-protein interaction, to regulate the extent of heterochromatin domains. Thus, Epe1 ensures that heterochromatin is restricted to the domains to which it is targeted by RNAi.     

Effect of C-banded heterochromatin on centromere separation

The present study is to determine the effects of centromeric heterochromatin on centromere separation. Amniotic cell cultures in which the centromeric heterochromatin of one chromosome was at least twice as large (qh+) as the heterochromatin (qh) in the homologous chromosome were selected. Fifteen amniotic cell samples with 1qh+, 9qh+ or 16qh+ were studied. The size of the centromeric heterochromatin was directly correlated with the delay in centromere separation. The chromosome with the smaller centromeric heterochromatin tended to show earlier centromere separation than the homologue with the larger heterochromatin. Our results suggest that the quantity of centromeric heterochromatin may influence the genetic control of centromere separation.     

Distorted heterochromatin replication in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Drosophila melanogaster</Emphasis> polytene chromosomes as a result of euchromatin-heterochromatin rearrangements

Studies of the position effect resulting from chromosome rearrangements in Drosophila melanogaster have shown that replication distortions in polytene chromosomes correlate with heritable gene silencing in mitotic cells. Earlier studies mostly focused on the effects of euchromatin-heterochromatin rearrangements on replication and silencing of euchromatic regions adjacent to the heterochromatin breakpoint. This review is based on published original data and considers the effect of rearrangements on heterochromatin: heterochromatin blocks that are normally underrepresented or underreplicated in polytene chromosomes are restored. Euchromatin proved to affect heterochromatin, preventing its underreplication. The effect is opposite to the known inactivation effect, which extends from heterochromatin to euchromatin. The trans-action of heterochromatin blocks on replication of heterochromatin placed within euchromatin is discussed. Distortions of heterochromatin replication in polytene chromosomes are considered to be an important characteristic associated with the functional role of the corresponding genome regions.     

Pericentromeric heterochromatin domains are maintained without accumulation of HP1

The heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) family is thought to be an important structural component of heterochromatin. HP1 proteins bind via their chromodomain to nucleosomes methylated at lysine 9 of histone H3 (H3K9me). To investigate the role of HP1 in maintaining heterochromatin structure, we used a dominant negative approach by expressing truncated HP1alpha or HP1beta proteins lacking a functional chromodomain. Expression of these truncated HP1 proteins individually or in combination resulted in a strong reduction of the accumulation of HP1alpha, HP1beta, and HP1gamma in pericentromeric heterochromatin domains in mouse 3T3 fibroblasts. The expression levels of HP1 did not change. The apparent displacement of HP1alpha, HP1beta, and HP1gamma from pericentromeric heterochromatin did not result in visible changes in the structure of pericentromeric heterochromatin domains, as visualized by DAPI staining and immunofluorescent labeling of H3K9me. Our results show that the accumulation of HP1alpha, HP1beta, and HP1gamma at pericentromeric heterochromatin domains is not required to maintain DAPI-stained pericentromeric heterochromatin domains and the methylated state of histone H3 at lysine 9 in such heterochromatin domains.     

SUMO modification is involved in the maintenance of heterochromatin stability in fission yeast

Several studies have suggested that SUMO may participate in the regulation of heterochromatin, but direct evidence is lacking. Here, we present a direct link between sumoylation and heterochromatin stability. SUMO deletion impaired silencing at heterochromatic regions and induced histone H3 Lys4 methylation, a hallmark of active chromatin in fission yeast. Our findings showed that the SUMO-conjugating enzyme Hus5/Ubc9 interacted with the conserved heterochromatin proteins Swi6, Chp2 (a paralog of Swi6), and Clr4 (H3 Lys9 methyltransferase). Moreover, chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) revealed that Hus5 was highly enriched in heterochromatic regions in a heterochromatin-dependent manner, suggesting a direct role of Hus5 in heterochromatin formation. We also found that Swi6, Chp2, and Clr4 themselves can be sumoylated in vivo and defective sumoylation of Swi6 or Chp2 compromised silencing. These results indicate that Hus5 associates with heterochromatin through interactions with heterochromatin proteins and modifies substrates whose sumoylations are required for heterochromatin stability, including heterochromatin proteins themselves.     

Distorted heterochromatin replication in Drosophila melanogaster polytene chromosomes as a result of euchromatin-heterochromatin rearrangements

Studies of the position effect resulting from chromosome rearrangements in Drosophila melanogaster have shown that replication distortions in polytene chromosomes correlate with heritable gene silencing in mitotic cells. Earlier studies mostly focused on the effects of euchromatin--heterochromatin rearrangements on replication and silencing of euchromatic regions adjacent to the heterochromatin breakpoint. This review is based on published original data and considers the effect of rearrangements on heterochromatin: heterochromatin blocks that are normally underrepresented or underreplicated in polytene chromosomes are restored. Euchromatin proved to affect heterochromatin, preventing its underreplication. The effect is opposite to the known inactivation effect, which extends from heterochromatin to euchromatin. The trans-action of heterochromatin blocks on replication of heterochromatin placed within euchromatin is discussed. Distortions of heterochromatin replication in polytene chromosomes are considered to be an important characteristic associated with the functional role of the corresponding genome regions.     

Cathepsin L stabilizes the histone modification landscape on the Y chromosome and pericentromeric heterochromatin

Posttranslational histone modifications and histone variants form a unique epigenetic landscape on mammalian chromosomes where the principal epigenetic heterochromatin markers, trimethylated histone H3(K9) and the histone H2A.Z, are inversely localized in relation to each other. Trimethylated H3(K9) marks pericentromeric constitutive heterochromatin and the male Y chromosome, while H2A.Z is dramatically reduced at these chromosomal locations. Inactivation of a lysosomal and nuclear protease, cathepsin L, causes a global redistribution of epigenetic markers. In cathepsin L knockout cells, the levels of trimethylated H3(K9) decrease dramatically, concomitant with its relocation away from heterochromatin, and H2A.Z becomes enriched at pericentromeric heterochromatin and the Y chromosome. This change is also associated with global relocation of heterochromatin protein HP1 and histone H3 methyltransferase Suv39h1 away from constitutive heterochromatin; however, it does not affect DNA methylation or chromosome segregation, phenotypes commonly associated with impaired histone H3(K9) methylation. Therefore, the key constitutive heterochromatin determinants can dynamically redistribute depending on physiological context but still maintain the essential function(s) of chromosomes. Thus, our data show that cathepsin L stabilizes epigenetic heterochromatin markers on pericentromeric heterochromatin and the Y chromosome through a novel mechanism that does not involve DNA methylation or affect heterochromatin structure and operates on both somatic and sex chromosomes.     

Heterogeneity of constitutive heterochromatin in somatic Syrian hamster chromosomes.

Syrian hamster constitutive heterochromatin was analyzed for C-band distribution and for BrU late-replication pattern. Characteristic for this species is relatively large amounts of sex-chromosome and autosomal heterochromatin. The distribution of constitutive heterochromatin was determined. The long term of the X chromosome, the whole Y, the short arms of 8 autosomal pairs, the long arm of the smallest metacentric pair, and the centromeric regions of 12 pairs stained intensely dark on C-band preparations. In contrast to the heterochromatin in the centromeric regions, the autosomal short-arm heterochromatin has an increased susceptibility to the denaturation process, as indicated by prolonged exposure to NaOH or Ba(OH)2. Such further exposure to denaturing agents results in an intense dark stain only on the sex-chromosome heterochromatin and centromeric regions of the autosomes. The BrdU late-replication pattern demonstrated that the late-replicating regions correspond to C-bands. Centromeric regions replicate late in the S phase; however, no centromeric region is among the latest replicating segments of the complement. Centromeric and noncentromeric heterochromatin are two distinct categories of constitutive heterochromatin.     

The Role of Heterochromatin in the Expression of a Heterochromatic Gene, the Rolled Locus of Drosophila Melanogaster

Constitutive heterochromatic regions of chromosomes are those that remain condensed through most or all of the cell cycle. In Drosophila melanogaster, the constitutive heterochromatic regions, located around the centromere, contain a number of gene loci, but at a much lower density than euchromatin. In the autosomal heterochromatin, the gene loci appear to be unique sequence genes interspersed among blocks of highly repeated sequences. Euchromatic genes do not function well when brought into the vicinity of heterochromatin (position-effect variegation). We test the possibility that the blocks of centromeric heterochromatin provide an environment essential for heterochromatic gene function. To assay directly the functional requirement of autosomal heterochromatic genes to reside in heterochromatin, the rolled (rl) gene, which is normally located deep in chromosome 2R heterochromatin, was relocated within small blocks of heterochromatin to a variety of euchromatic positions by successive series of chromosomal rearrangements. The function of the rl gene is severely affected in rearrangements in which the rl gene is isolated in a small block of heterochromatin, and these position effects can be reverted by rearrangements which bring the rl gene closer to any large block of autosomal or X chromosome heterochromatin. There is some evidence that five other 2R heterochromatic genes are also affected among these rearrangements. These findings demonstrate that the heterochromatic genes, in contrast to euchromatic genes whose function is inhibited by relocation to heterochromatin, require proximity to heterochromatin to function properly, and they argue strongly that a major function of the highly repeated satellite DNA, which comprises most of the heterochromatin, is to provide this heterochromatic environment.     

Phase transitions in heterochromatin organization

Heterochromatin formation has been proposed to involve phase transitions on the level of the three-dimensional folding of heterochromatin regions and the liquid–liquid demixing of heterochromatin proteins. Here, I outline the hallmarks of such transitions and the current challenges to detect them in living cells. I further discuss the abundance and properties of prominent heterochromatin proteins and relate them to their potential role in driving phase transitions. Recent data from mouse fibroblasts indicate that pericentric heterochromatin is organized via a reordering transition on the level of heterochromatin regions that does not necessarily involve liquid–liquid demixing of heterochromatin proteins. Evaluating key hallmarks of the different candidate phase transition mechanisms across cell types and species will be needed to complete the current picture.     

Arrangement of centromeres in mouse cells

Applying a staining procedure which reveals constitutive heterochromatin to cytological preparations of the mouse (Mus musculus), one detects heterochromatin pieces at the centromeric areas of all chromosomes except the Y. The Y chromosome is somewhat heteropyenotic in general but possesses no intensely stained centromeric heterochromatin. The arrangement of the centromeric heterochromatin in interphase cells is apparently specific for a given cell type. In meiotic prophase, centromeric heterochromatin may form clusters among bivalents. From the location of the centromeric heterochromatin of the X chromosome in the sex bivalent, it is concluded that the association between the X and Y (common end) in meiosis is limited to the distal portions of the sex elements.     

Chromosome restriction enzyme digestion in domestic pig (Sus scrofa) constitutive heterochromatin arrangement

The bimodal karyotype of pig appears to contain two types of constitutive heterochromatin, reflecting different satellite DNA families: GC-rich heterochromatin located mainly in the centromeric regions of the biarmed chromosomes, and less-GC-rich heterochromatin in the centromeric regions of the one-armed chromosomes. In order to better discriminate this constitutive heterochromatin, we treated pig chromosome preparations with eight different restriction endonucleases, followed by C-banding. This technique allowed an expedited characterization of the constitutive heterochromatin and demonstrated its great heterogeneity in pig chromosomes. Our work allowed the detection and identification of twenty-two heterochromatin subclasses (twelve centromeric, four interstitial, five telomeric, and the Yq band). Moreover, several cryptic interstitial and telomeric bands were revealed. The work presented here is useful not only for fundamental studies of chromosome banding and constitutive heterochromatin, but also offers a new approach for pig clinical cytogenetics.     

DA/DAPI-Fluorescent heteromorphism of human Y chromosome

Summary Variation of DA/DAPI intensity in the Yq12 band was observed in five amniotic cell specimens and one blood specimen from the father of one fetus. Three distinct classes of Yq heterochromatin were identified by distamycin A (DA) treatment of the cell cultures and various staining techniques. The heterochromatin in the Yq11.23 sub-band does not under-condense when exposed to DA, and shows pale fluorescence with quinacrine staining, positive C-banding, and bright fluorescence with DA/DAPI technique. This class of heterochromatin was consistently observed in all specimens studied. The other two classes of heterochromatin are in the Yq12 band. Both show undercondensation when exposed to DA, quinacrine-bright fluorescence, and positive C-banding; howover, one class of heterochromatin shows DA/DAPI-bright fluorescence and the other shows pale fluorescence. The size and banding intensity of the two classes of heterochromatin in Yq12 are variable. These results provide cytological evidence of heterogeneity within the Y heterochromatin region containing AT-rich DNA.     

Studies on polytene chromosomes of Smittia parthenogenetica (Chironomidae,Diptera)

In polytene chromosome II of Smittia parthenogenetica a heterochromatin insertion has been studied which is derived from a germ-line limited chromosome section (Bauer, 1970). This insertion is C-banding positive, late replicating, inactive in RNA synthesis, fluoresces brightly with quinacrine and is polytenized. After N-banding a major part of the heterochromatin insertion is N-banding negative, whereas in the centre of the insertion a N-banding positive body is present. The properties of the N-positive and N-negative parts of the inserted heterochromatin section are compared with the properties of the heterochromatin of Chironomus melanotus and Drosophila melanogaster. It is concluded that the heterochromatin insertion consists of two different heterochromatin types and it is discussed whether the N-banding positive part within the insertion represents a heterochromatin type which is underreplicated during polytenization.Dedicated to Professor Dr. Hans Bauer in honour of his 75th birthday on September 27, 1979     

Targeting heterochromatin formation to transposable elements in Drosophila: Potential roles of the piRNA system

Successful heterochromatin formation is critical for genome stability in eukaryotes, both to maintain structures needed for mitosis and meiosis and to silence potentially harmful transposable elements. Conversely, inappropriate heterochromatin assembly can lead to inappropriate silencing and other deleterious effects. Hence targeting heterochromatin assembly to appropriate regions of the genome is of utmost importance. Here we focus on heterochromatin assembly in Drosophila melanogaster, the model organism in which variegation, or cell-to-cell variable gene expression resulting from heterochromatin formation, was first described. In particular, we review the potential role of transposable elements as genetic determinants of the chromatin state and examine how small RNA pathways may participate in the process of targeted heterochromatin formation.     

Distinct roles for Sir2 and RNAi in centromeric heterochromatin nucleation,spreading and maintenance

Epigenetically regulated heterochromatin domains govern essential cellular activities. A key feature of heterochromatin domains is the presence of hypoacetylated nucleosomes, which are methylated on lysine 9 of histone H3 (H3K9me). Here, we investigate the requirements for establishment, spreading and maintenance of heterochromatin using fission yeast centromeres as a paradigm. We show that establishment of heterochromatin on centromeric repeats is initiated at modular ‘nucleation sites’ by RNA interference (RNAi), ensuring the mitotic stability of centromere‐bearing minichromosomes. We demonstrate that the histone deacetylases Sir2 and Clr3 and the chromodomain protein Swi6^HP1 are required for H3K9me spreading from nucleation sites, thus allowing formation of extended heterochromatin domains. We discovered that RNAi and Sir2 along with Swi6^HP1 operate in two independent pathways to maintain heterochromatin. Finally, we demonstrate that tethering of Sir2 is pivotal to the maintenance of heterochromatin at an ectopic locus in the absence of RNAi. These analyses reveal that Sir2, together with RNAi, are sufficient to ensure heterochromatin integrity and provide evidence for sequential establishment, spreading and maintenance steps in the assembly of centromeric heterochromatin.