Interaction of early secretory pathway and Golgi membranes with microtubules and microtubule motors

This review summarizes the data describing the role of cellular microtubules in transportation of membrane vesicles — transport containers for secreted proteins or lipids. Most events of early vesicular transport in animal cells (from the endoplasmic reticulum to the Golgi apparatus and in the opposite recycling direction) are mediated by microtubules and microtubule motor proteins. Data on the role of dynein and kinesin in early vesicle transport remain controversial, probably because of the differentiated role of these proteins in the movements of vesicles or membrane tubules with various cargos and at different stages of secretion and retrograde transport. Microtubules and dynein motor protein are essential for maintaining a compact structure of the Golgi apparatus; moreover, there is a set of proteins that are essential for Golgi compactness. Dispersion of ribbon-like Golgi often occurs under physiological conditions in interphase cells. Golgi is localized in the leading part of crawling cultured fibroblasts, which also depends on microtubules and dynein. The Golgi apparatus creates its own system of microtubules by attracting γ-tubulin and some microtubule-associated proteins to membranes. Molecular mechanisms of binding microtubule-associated and motor proteins to membranes are very diverse, suggesting the possibility of regulation of Golgi interaction with microtubules during cell differentiation. To illustrate some statements, we present our own data showing that the cluster of vesicles induced by expression of constitutively active GTPase Sar1a[H79G] in cells is dispersed throughout the cell after microtubule disruption. Movement of vesicles in cells containing the intermediate compartment protein ERGIC53/LMANI was inhibited by inhibiting dynein. Inhibiting protein kinase LOSK/SLK prevented orientation of Golgi to the leading part of crawling cells, but the activity of dynein was not inhibited according to data on the movement of ERGIC53/LMANI-marked vesicles.     

Enrico Ferri’s Scientific Socialism: A Marxist Interpretation of Herbert Spencer’s Organic Analogy

Spencer’s evolutionary philosophy is usually identified with right-wing doctrines such as individualism, laissez-faire liberalism and even conservatism. Since he himself defended similar positions, it is perhaps not surprising that the study of the political interpretations of his ideas has drawn relatively little attention. In this article I propose to examine a rather atypical reading of Spencer’s organic analogy, though definitely not a marginal one: Enrico Ferri’s Marxist doctrine of Scientific Socialism. Ferri is not a figure unknown to scholars interested in the political aspects of the evolutionary debate. Nonetheless, the relation between his theory and Spencer’s bio-sociology – notably the complex dialectic of themes such as “the struggle for existence” versus “class struggle,” or “evolution” versus “revolution” – has not yet received full-length analysis. In my study I investigate the diffusion of Spencer’s ideas in Italy and their impact on the new “positivist” sciences of psychology and sociology inasmuch as these questions are essential to understanding Ferri’s position. Throughout, I stress the importance of the intellectual and political context in the process of appropriation of ideas that led to this unexpected shift in meaning.¹ Spencer, 1843, 1851, 1879–1893, 1884.     

How cellular membranes can regulate microtubule network

Microtubule array in eukaryotic cells supports directed transport of various cargoes driven by motor proteins. The arrangement of microtubules in cytoplasm is not stochastic; they are organized in a certain way setting a system of coordinates for intracellular transport. Most cultured fibroblast-like cells possess a radial microtubule array with the minus ends of microtubules gathered on the centrosome and plus ends directed towards the periphery of the cell. Mechanisms that regulate the formation of radial microtubule system remain unclear. Usually centrosome works as a microtubule-organizing center; however, the radial system of microtubules can be formed without centrosome participation. At least in some cases microtubule network can be organized by dynein-dynactin complexes associated with membrane vesicles. Membrane vesicles can nucleate microtubules, anchor them and move along them. However, the role of membrane organelles in microtubule organization began to attract attention of researches only recently. It this review we summarize the data indicating that membrane organelles can organize microtubules, providing “tracks” for their subsequent transport.     

A role of microtubules during the formation of cell processes in neuronal and non-neuronal cells

This review discusses the role of microtubules in the formation of processes from neuronal and non-neuronal cells. In elongating axons of the neuron, tubulin molecules are transported toward the end of pre-existing microtubules, which may be nucleated at the centrosome, via a mechanism called slow axonal flow. Two different hypotheses are presented to explain this mechanism; the transport of soluble monomers and/or oligomers versus the transport of polymerized microtubules. The majority of tubulin seems to be transported as small oligomers as shown by the data presented so far. Alternatively, an active transport of polymerized microtubules driven by microtubule-based motor proteins is postulated as being responsible for the non-uniform polarity of microtubule bundles in dendrites of the neuron. Microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs) play a crucial role in stabilizing the microtubular arrays, whereas the non-uniform polarity of microtubules may be established with the aid of microtubule-based motor proteins. The signals activating centrosomal proteins and MAPs, resulting in process formation, include phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of these proteins. Not only neuronal cells, but also renal glomerular podocytes develop prominent cell processes equipped with well-organized microtubular cytoskeletons, and intermediate and actin filaments. A novel cell culture system for podocytes, in which process formation can be induced, should provide further evidence that microtubules play a pivotal role in process formation of non-neuronal cells.     

Myosin-dependent transport in neurons

Axonal transport in neurons has been shown to be microtubule dependent, driven by the molecular motor proteins kinesin and dynein. However, organelles undergoing fast transport can often pause or rapidly change directions without apparent dissociation from their transport tracks. Cytoskeletal polymers such as neurofilaments and microtubules have also been shown to make infrequent but rapid movements in axons indicating that their transport is likely to involve molecular motors. In addition, neurons have multiple compartments that are devoid of microtubules where transport of organelles is still seen to occur. These areas are rich in other cytoskeletal polymers such as actin filaments. Transported organelles have been shown to associate with multiple motor proteins including myosins. This suggests that nonmicrotubule-based transport may be myosin driven. In this review we will focus our attention on myosin motors known to be present in neurons and evaluate the evidence that they contribute to transport or other functions in the different compartments of the neuron.     

Cytoplasmic microtubules in rabbit platelets

Summary A system of microtubules 200–250 Å in diameter is described in the cytoplasm of rabbit platelets. In thin sections they are seen most frequently cut in cross section and at opposite ends of the elliptical platelet where they form a compact bundle containing 10 to 30 microtubules. In other platelet sections they describe a circumferential course 500 to 600 Å deep to the plasma membrane. Occasional microtubules pass between the marginal band and the centre of the platelet.The relationship of the microtubule system to fibres previously observed in the hyaloplasm of platelets spread on films is discussed, and the marginal band of microtubules in platelets equated to that present in nucleated erythrocytes.I am indebted to Dr. E. H. Mercer for his helpful criticisms and to Miss N. Carroll and Mr. R. G. Hill for technical assistance.     

Overexpression of Tau Protein Inhibits Kinesin-dependent Trafficking of Vesicles,Mitochondria, and Endoplasmic Reticulum: Implications for Alzheimer's Disease

The neuronal microtubule-associated protein tau plays an important role in establishing cell polarity by stabilizing axonal microtubules that serve as tracks for motor-protein–driven transport processes. To investigate the role of tau in intracellular transport, we studied the effects of tau expression in stably transfected CHO cells and differentiated neuroblastoma N2a cells. Tau causes a change in cell shape, retards cell growth, and dramatically alters the distribution of various organelles, known to be transported via microtubule-dependent motor proteins. Mitochondria fail to be transported to peripheral cell compartments and cluster in the vicinity of the microtubule-organizing center. The endoplasmic reticulum becomes less dense and no longer extends to the cell periphery. In differentiated N2a cells, the overexpression of tau leads to the disappearance of mitochondria from the neurites. These effects are caused by tau''s binding to microtubules and slowing down intracellular transport by preferential impairment of plus-end–directed transport mediated by kinesin-like motor proteins. Since in Alzheimer''s disease tau protein is elevated and mislocalized, these observations point to a possible cause for the gradual degeneration of neurons.     

Lipase-catalyzed synthesis of fatty acid sugar ester using extremely supersaturated sugar solution in ionic liquids

Artificial nanotransport systems inspired by intracellular transport processes have been investigated for over a decade using the motor protein kinesin and microtubules. However, only unidirectional cargo transport has been achieved for the purpose of nanotransport in a microfluidic system. Here, we demonstrate bidirectional nanotransport by integrating kinesin and dynein motor proteins. Our molecular system allows microtubule orientation of either polarity in a microfluidic channel to construct a transport track. Each motor protein acts as a nanoactuators that transports microspheres in opposite directions determined by the polarity of the oriented microtubules: kinesin-coated microspheres move toward the plus end of microtubules, whereas dynein-coated microspheres move toward the minus end. We demonstrate both unidirectional and bidirectional transport using kinesin- and dynein-coated microspheres on microtubules oriented and glutaraldehyde-immobilized in a microfluidic channel. Tracking and statistical analysis of microsphere movement demonstrate that 87-98% of microspheres move in the designated direction at a mean velocity of 0.22-0.28 microm/s for kinesin-coated microspheres and 0.34-0.39 microm/s for dynein-coated microspheres. This bidirectional nanotransport goes beyond conventional unidirectional transport to achieve more complex artificial nanotransport in vitro.     

Cytoplasmic Dynein and Dynactin Are Required for the Transport of Microtubules into the Axon

Previous work from our laboratory suggested that microtubules are released from the neuronal centrosome and then transported into the axon (Ahmad, F.J., and P.W. Baas. 1995. J. Cell Sci. 108: 2761–2769). In these studies, cultured sympathetic neurons were treated with nocodazole to depolymerize most of their microtubule polymer, rinsed free of the drug for a few minutes to permit a burst of microtubule assembly from the centrosome, and then exposed to nanomolar levels of vinblastine to suppress further microtubule assembly from occurring. Over time, the microtubules appeared first near the centrosome, then dispersed throughout the cytoplasm, and finally concentrated beneath the periphery of the cell body and within developing axons. In the present study, we microinjected fluorescent tubulin into the neurons at the time of the vinblastine treatment. Fluorescent tubulin was not detected in the microtubules over the time frame of the experiment, confirming that the redistribution of microtubules observed with the experimental regime reflects microtubule transport rather than microtubule assembly. To determine whether cytoplasmic dynein is the motor protein that drives this transport, we experimentally increased the levels of the dynamitin subunit of dynactin within the neurons. Dynactin, a complex of proteins that mediates the interaction of cytoplasmic dynein and its cargo, dissociates under these conditions, resulting in a cessation of all functions of the motor tested to date (Echeverri, C.J., B.M. Paschal, K.T. Vaughan, and R.B. Vallee. 1996. J. Cell Biol. 132: 617–633). In the presence of excess dynamitin, the microtubules did not show the outward progression but instead remained near the centrosome or dispersed throughout the cytoplasm. On the basis of these results, we conclude that cytoplasmic dynein and dynactin are essential for the transport of microtubules from the centrosome into the axon.     

Interactions between the Translation Machinery and Microtubules

Microtubules are components of eukaryotic cytoskeleton that are involved in the transport of various components from the nucleus to the cell periphery and back. They also act as a platform for assembly of complex molecular ensembles. Ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complexes, such as ribosomes and mRNPs, are transported over significant distances (e.g. to neuronal processes) along microtubules. The association of RNPs with microtubules and their transport along these structures are essential for compartmentalization of protein biosynthesis in cells. Microtubules greatly facilitate assembly of stress RNP granules formed by accumulation of translation machinery components during cell stress response. Microtubules are necessary for the cytoplasm-to-nucleus transport of proteins, including ribosomal proteins. At the same time, ribosomal proteins and RNA-binding proteins can influence cell mobility and cytoplasm organization by regulating microtubule dynamics. The molecular mechanisms underlying the association between the translation machinery components and microtubules have not been studied systematically; the results of such studies are mostly fragmentary. In this review, we attempt to fill this gap by summarizing and discussing the data on protein and RNA components of the translation machinery that directly interact with microtubules or microtubule motor proteins.     

Hook2 contributes to aggresome formation

Background  

Aggresomes are pericentrosomal accumulations of misfolded proteins, chaperones and proteasomes. Their positioning near the centrosome, like that of other organelles, requires active, microtubule-dependent transport. Linker proteins that can associate with the motor protein dynein, organelles, and microtubules are thought to contribute to the active maintenance of the juxtanuclear localization of many membrane bound organelles and aggresomes. Hook proteins have been proposed to serve as adaptors for the association of cargos with dynein for transport on microtubules. Hook2 was shown to localize to the centrosome, bind centriolin, and contribute to centrosomal function.     

Polarity of microtubular structures in manchette-like formations: Possible role of the “11th filament”

Bundles of microtubular structures appear in the cytoplasm of spermatids of the African frog Dicroglossus occipitalis. They are observed in the vicinity of axonemes. Natural tubulin polymerization leads to the formation of hooks on microtubular structures. They can be related to experimentally induced tubulin hooks. The direction of curvature of the hooks allows us to define the polarity of the bundles. This is opposite to the polarity of axonemal microtubules: Bundles and axonemes are antiparallel. Under colchicine action, arch-like microtubular structures are shown to open in the same direction as they lock. This enables us to characterize their opening and locking site: It corresponds to the place of the “11th filament” described in microtubular structures such axonemes. The “11th filament” is thus demonstrated to be the most susceptible to natural opening and to the action of colchicine in microtubular structures.     

Coupling viruses to dynein and kinesin-1

It is now clear that transport on microtubules by dynein and kinesin family motors has an important if not critical role in the replication and spread of many different viruses. Understanding how viruses hijack dynein and kinesin motors using a limited repertoire of proteins offers a great opportunity to determine the molecular basis of motor recruitment. In this review, we discuss the interactions of dynein and kinesin-1 with adenovirus, the α herpes viruses: herpes simplex virus (HSV1) and pseudorabies virus (PrV), human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and vaccinia virus. We highlight where the molecular links to these opposite polarity motors have been defined and discuss the difficulties associated with identifying viral binding partners where the basis of motor recruitment remains to be established. Ultimately, studying microtubule-based motility of viruses promises to answer fundamental questions as to how the activity and recruitment of the dynein and kinesin-1 motors are coordinated and regulated during bi-directional transport.     

The role of motor proteins in signal propagation

The signaling and transport systems of eucaryotic cells are tightly interconnected: intracellular transport along microtubules and microfilaments is required to position signaling-pathway components, while signaling molecules control activity of motor proteins and their interaction with tracks and cargoes. Recent data, however, give evidence that active transport is engaged in signaling as a means of signal transduction. This review focuses on this specific aspect of the interaction of two systems.     

Bidirectional transport of organelles: unity and struggle of opposing motors

Bidirectional transport along microtubules is ensured by opposing motor proteins: cytoplasmic dynein that drives cargo to the minus-ends and various kinesins that generally move to the plus-ends of microtubules. Regulation of motor proteins that are simultaneously bound to the same organelle is required to maintain directional transport and prevent pausing of cargo pulled away by motors of opposite polarity. Debates of the recent decade have been focused on two possible mechanisms of such regulation: (i) coordination, which implies that only one type of motors is active at a given time, and (ii) tug-of-war, which assumes that both motors are active at the same time and that direction of transport depends on the outcome of motor's confrontation. The initial idea of coordination has been challenged by observations of simultaneous activity of plus- and minus-end-directed motors applied to the same cargo. Analysis of the available data indicates that coordination and tug-of-war theories rather complement than contradict each other: cargo interacts with two teams of active motors, the resulting direction and the winner team are determined by coordination complexes, but the activity of the loser team is never completely inhibited and remains at some background level. Such persisting activity might enhance the overall efficiency of transport by increasing processivity or helping to overcome the obstacles on microtubule track.     

Origins of reversed directionality in the ncd molecular motor.

The head or motor domain of the ncd (non-claret disjunctional) molecular motor is 41% identical to that of kinesin, yet moves along microtubules in the opposite direction to kinesin. We show here that despite the reversed directionality of ncd, its kinetics in solution are homologous in key respects to those of kinesin. The rate limiting step, ADP release, occurs at 0.0033 s-1 at 100 mM NaCl and is accelerated approximately 1000-fold when the motor binds to microtubules. Other reaction steps are all very fast (> 0.1 s-1) compared with ADP release, and the motor is consequently paused in the ncd.ADP state until microtubule binding occurs (Kd = 2 microM), at which point ADP release is triggered and the motor locks onto the microtubule in a rigor-like state. These data identify close functional homology between the strong binding states of kinesin and ncd, and in view of this we discuss a possible mechanism for directional reversal, in which the strong binding states of ncd and kinesin are functionally identical, but the weak binding states are biased in opposite directions.     

Directional motility of kinesin motor proteins

Kinesin motor proteins are molecules capable of moving along microtubules. They share homology in the so-called core motor domain which acts as a microtubule-dependent ATPase. The surprising finding that different members of the superfamily move in opposite directions along microtubules despite their close similarity has stimulated intensive research on the determinants of motor directionality. This article reviews recent biophysical, biochemical, structural and mutagenic studies that contributed to the elucidation of the mechanisms that cause directional motion of kinesin motor proteins.