Complementation of a Herpes Simplex Virus ICP0 Null Mutant by Varicella-Zoster Virus ORF61p

The herpes simplex virus (HSV) ICP0 protein acts to overcome intrinsic cellular defenses that repress viral α gene expression. In that vein, viruses that have mutations in ICP0''s RING finger or are deleted for the gene are sensitive to interferon, as they fail to direct degradation of promyelocytic leukemia protein (PML), a component of host nuclear domain 10s. While varicella-zoster virus is also insensitive to interferon, ORF61p, its ICP0 ortholog, failed to degrade PML. A recombinant virus with each coding region of the gene for ICP0 replaced with sequences encoding ORF61p was constructed. This virus was compared to an ICP0 deletion mutant and wild-type HSV. The recombinant degraded only Sp100 and not PML and grew to higher titers than its ICP0 null parental virus, but it was sensitive to interferon, like the virus from which it was derived. This analysis permitted us to compare the activities of ICP0 and ORF61p in identical backgrounds and revealed distinct biologic roles for these proteins.Alphaherpesviruses encode orthologs of the herpes simplex virus (HSV) α gene product ICP0. ICP0 is a nuclear phosphoprotein that behaves as a promiscuous activator of viral and cellular genes (7, 11, 28, 29). ICP0 also functions as an E3 ubiquitin ligase to target several host proteins for proteasomal degradation (4, 10, 11, 16, 26). Through this activity, ICP0 promotes degradation of components of nuclear domain 10 (ND10) bodies, including the promyelocytic leukemia protein (PML) and Sp100. These proteins are implicated in silencing of herpesvirus genomes (9, 10, 22, 34). Therefore, ICP0-mediated degradation of ND10 components may disrupt silencing of HSV genes to enable efficient gene expression. This hypothesis provides a plausible mechanistic explanation of how ICP0 induces gene activation.Introduction of DNA encoding the ICP0 orthologs from HSV, bovine herpesvirus, equine herpesvirus, and varicella-zoster virus (VZV) can also affect nuclear structures and proteins (27). In addition, and more specific to this report, ORF61p, the VZV ortholog, activates viral promoters and enhances infectivity of viral DNA like ICP0, the prototype for this gene family (24, 25). However, we have previously demonstrated two key biological differences between the HSV and VZV orthologs. We first showed that unlike ICP0, ORF61p is unable to complement depletion of BAG3, a host cochaperone protein. As a result, VZV is affected by silencing of BAG3 (15), whereas growth of HSV is altered only when ICP0 is not expressed (17). Furthermore, we have shown that while both proteins target components of ND10s, expression of ICP0 results in degradation of both PML and Sp100, whereas ORF61p specifically reduces Sp100 levels (16). These findings suggest that these proteins have evolved separately to provide different functions for virus replication.Virus mutants lacking the ICP0 gene have an increased particle-to-PFU ratio, a substantially lower yield, and decreased levels of α gene expression, in a multiplicity-of-infection (MOI)- and cell-type-dependent manner (2, 4, 8, 33). These mutants are also defective at degrading ND10 components (23). Depletion of PML and Sp100 accelerates virus gene expression and increases plaquing efficiency of HSV ICP0-defective viruses but has no effect on wild-type virus, suggesting that PML and Sp100 are components of an intrinsic anti-HSV defense mechanism that is counteracted by ICP0''s E3 ligase activity (9, 10). Interestingly, ICP0 null viruses are also hypersensitive to interferon (IFN) (26), a property that was suggested to be mediated via PML (3).To directly compare the activities of the two orthologs, we constructed an HSV mutant virus that expresses ORF61p in place of ICP0. The resulting chimeric virus only partially rescues the ICP0 null phenotype. Our studies emphasize the biological differences between ICP0 and ORF61p and shed light on the requirements for PML and Sp100 during infection.     

Conserved Motifs within Ebola and Marburg Virus VP40 Proteins Are Important for Stability,Localization, and Subsequent Budding of Virus-Like Particles

The filovirus VP40 protein is capable of budding from mammalian cells in the form of virus-like particles (VLPs) that are morphologically indistinguishable from infectious virions. Ebola virus VP40 (eVP40) contains well-characterized overlapping L domains, which play a key role in mediating efficient virus egress. L domains represent only one component required for efficient budding and, therefore, there is a need to identify and characterize additional domains important for VP40 function. We demonstrate here that the ₉₆LPLGVA₁₀₁ sequence of eVP40 and the corresponding ₈₄LPLGIM₈₉ sequence of Marburg virus VP40 (mVP40) are critical for efficient release of VP40 VLPs. Indeed, deletion of these motifs essentially abolished the ability of eVP40 and mVP40 to bud as VLPs. To address the mechanism by which the ₉₆LPLGVA₁₀₁ motif of eVP40 contributes to egress, a series of point mutations were introduced into this motif. These mutants were then compared to the eVP40 wild type in a VLP budding assay to assess budding competency. Confocal microscopy and gel filtration analyses were performed to assess their pattern of intracellular localization and ability to oligomerize, respectively. Our results show that mutations disrupting the ₉₆LPLGVA₁₀₁ motif resulted in both altered patterns of intracellular localization and self-assembly compared to wild-type controls. Interestingly, coexpression of either Ebola virus GP-WT or mVP40-WT with eVP40-ΔLPLGVA failed to rescue the budding defective eVP40-ΔLPLGVA mutant into VLPs; however, coexpression of eVP40-WT with mVP40-ΔLPLGIM successfully rescued budding of mVP40-ΔLPLGIM into VLPs at mVP40-WT levels. In sum, our findings implicate the LPLGVA and LPLGIM motifs of eVP40 and mVP40, respectively, as being important for VP40 structure/stability and budding.Ebola and Marburg viruses are members of the family Filoviridae. Filoviruses are filamentous, negative-sense, single-stranded RNA viruses that cause lethal hemorrhagic fevers in both humans and nonhuman primates (5). Filoviruses encode seven viral proteins including: NP (major nucleoprotein), VP35 (phosphoprotein), VP40 (matrix protein), GP (glycoprotein), VP30 (minor nucleoprotein), VP24 (secondary matrix protein), and L (RNA-dependent RNA polymerase) (2, 5, 10, 12, 45). Numerous studies have shown that expression of Ebola virus VP40 (eVP40) alone in mammalian cells leads to the production of virus-like particles (VLPs) with filamentous morphology which is indistinguishable from infectious Ebola virus particles (12, 17, 18, 25, 26, 27, 30, 31, 34, 49). Like many enveloped viruses such as rhabdovirus (11) and arenaviruses (44), Ebola virus encodes late-assembly or L domains, which are sequences required for the membrane fission event that separates viral and cellular membranes to release nascent virion particles (1, 5, 7, 10, 12, 18, 25, 27, 34). Thus far, four classes of L domains have been identified which were defined by their conserved amino acid core sequences: the Pro-Thr/Ser-Ala-Pro (PT/SAP) motif (25, 27), the Pro-Pro-x-Tyr (PPxY) motif (11, 12, 18, 19, 41, 53), the Tyr-x-x-Leu (YxxL) motif (3, 15, 27, 37), and the Phe-Pro-Ile-Val (FPIV) motif (39). Both PTAP and the PPxY motifs are essential for efficient particle release for eVP40 (25, 27, 48, 49), whereas mVP40 contains only a PPxY motif. L domains are believed to act as docking sites for the recruitment of cellular proteins involved in endocytic trafficking and multivesicular body biogenesis to facilitate virus-cell separation (8, 13, 14, 16, 28, 29, 33, 36, 43, 50, 51).In addition to L domains, oligomerization, and plasma-membrane localization of VP40 are two functions of the protein that are critical for efficient budding of VLPs and virions. Specific sequences involved in self-assembly and membrane localization have yet to be defined precisely. However, recent reports have attempted to identify regions of VP40 that are important for its overall function in assembly and budding. For example, the amino acid region ₂₁₂KLR₂₁₄ located at the C-terminal region was found to be important for efficient release of eVP40 VLPs, with Leu₂₁₃ being the most critical (30). Mutation of the ₂₁₂KLR₂₁₄ region resulted in altered patterns of cellular localization and oligomerization of eVP40 compared to those of the wild-type genotype (30). In addition, the proline at position 53 was also implicated as being essential for eVP40 VLP release and plasma-membrane localization (54).In a more recent study, a YPLGVG motif within the M protein of Nipah virus (NiV) was shown to be important for stability, membrane binding, and budding of NiV VLPs (35). Whether this NiV M motif represents a new class of L domain remains to be determined. However, it is clear that this YPLGVG motif of NiV M is important for budding, perhaps involving a novel mechanism (35). Our rationale for investigating the corresponding, conserved motifs present within the Ebola and Marburg virus VP40 proteins was based primarily on these findings with NiV. In addition, Ebola virus VP40 motif maps close to the hinge region separating the N- and C-terminal domains of VP40 (4). Thus, the ₉₆LPLGVA₁₀₁ motif of eVP40 is predicted to be important for the overall stability and function of VP40 during egress. Findings presented here indicate that disruption of these filovirus VP40 motifs results in a severe defect in VLP budding, due in part to impairment in overall VP40 structure, stability and/or intracellular localization.     

Genetic Evidence for a Connection between Rous Sarcoma Virus Gag Nuclear Trafficking and Genomic RNA Packaging

The packaging of retroviral genomic RNA (gRNA) requires cis-acting elements within the RNA and trans-acting elements within the Gag polyprotein. The packaging signal ψ, at the 5′ end of the viral gRNA, binds to Gag through interactions with basic residues and Cys-His box RNA-binding motifs in the nucleocapsid. Although specific interactions between Gag and gRNA have been demonstrated previously, where and when they occur is not well understood. We discovered that the Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) Gag protein transiently localizes to the nucleus, although the roles of Gag nuclear trafficking in virus replication have not been fully elucidated. A mutant of RSV (Myr1E) with enhanced plasma membrane targeting of Gag fails to undergo nuclear trafficking and also incorporates reduced levels of gRNA into virus particles compared to those in wild-type particles. Based on these results, we hypothesized that Gag nuclear entry might facilitate gRNA packaging. To test this idea by using a gain-of-function genetic approach, a bipartite nuclear localization signal (NLS) derived from the nucleoplasmin protein was inserted into the Myr1E Gag sequence (generating mutant Myr1E.NLS) in an attempt to restore nuclear trafficking. Here, we report that the inserted NLS enhanced the nuclear localization of Myr1E.NLS Gag compared to that of Myr1E Gag. Also, the NLS sequence restored gRNA packaging to nearly wild-type levels in viruses containing Myr1E.NLS Gag, providing genetic evidence linking nuclear trafficking of the retroviral Gag protein with gRNA incorporation.The encapsidation of the RNA genome is essential for retrovirus replication. Because the viral genomic RNA (gRNA) constitutes only a small fraction of the total cellular mRNA, a specific Gag-RNA interaction is thought to be required for viral genome packaging (2). The determinants of virus-specific gRNA incorporation include the cis-acting element at the 5′end of the viral gRNA, known as the packaging signal (ψ), and the nucleocapsid (NC) domain of the Gag polyprotein (3, 14, 62). In Rous sarcoma virus (RSV), the NC domain contains basic residues that are required for the recognition of and binding to ψ, as well as two Cys-His motifs that maintain the overall conformation of NC and are essential for RNA packaging (30, 31).Packaging of gRNA into progeny virions requires that the unspliced viral mRNA be exported from the nucleus. However, cellular proofreading mechanisms ensure that unspliced or intron-containing mRNAs are retained in the nucleus until splicing occurs. Complex retroviruses like human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) overcome this export block of unspliced genomes by encoding the Rev protein, which interacts with a cis-acting sequence in the viral RNA (the Rev-responsive element [RRE]) to facilitate cytoplasmic accumulation of intron-containing viral mRNA (16, 35). The export of the Rev-viral RNA complex is mediated through the interaction of a leucine-rich nuclear export signal (NES) in Rev with the CRM1 nuclear export factor (17, 18, 37, 41). Simple retroviruses do not encode Rev-like regulatory proteins, so other strategies for the export of unspliced viral RNAs are needed. For Mason-Pfizer monkey virus, a cis-acting constitutive transport element induces nuclear export of the unspliced viral RNA in a process mediated by the cellular mRNA nuclear export factor TAP (5, 25, 46, 63). In RSV, an RNA element composed of either of the two direct repeats flanking the src gene mediates the cytoplasmic accumulation of unspliced viral RNA by using host export proteins TAP and Dpb5 (29, 42, 44).The findings of recent studies suggest that specific RNA export pathways direct viral gRNA to sites of virion assembly (56); for example, HIV-1 gRNA export out of the nucleus by the Rev-RRE-CRM1 complex is required for the proper subcellular localization of Gag and efficient virus particle production (26, 57). In the case of RSV, little is known about the trafficking of the viral RNA destined for virion encapsidation or the effects of the gRNA nuclear export pathway on Gag trafficking and virus particle production. However, we do know that RSV Gag enters the nucleus during infection, owing to nuclear localization signals (NLSs) in the matrix (MA) and NC domains. The nuclear localization of Gag is transient, and export is mediated by a CRM1-dependent NES in the p10 region (6, 52, 53). Thus, it is feasible that Gag may facilitate the nuclear export of the gRNA, either directly or indirectly, to promote particle assembly (53).In support of this idea, Gag mutants engineered to be more efficiently directed to the plasma membrane than wild-type Gag by the addition of the Src membrane-binding domain (in Myr1E virus) or by the insertion of extra basic residues (in SuperM virus) are not concentrated in nuclei when cells are treated with the CRM1 inhibitor leptomycin B (LMB) (8, 20, 53). Moreover, Myr1E and SuperM virus particles incorporate reduced levels of viral gRNA compared to the levels incorporated by wild-type particles. Thus, there is a correlation between the nuclear transit of Gag and gRNA packaging, although the Myr1E and SuperM viruses may be deficient in gRNA encapsidation because they are transported to the plasma membrane too rapidly (8). To test the hypothesis that the loss of Gag nuclear trafficking is responsible for the gRNA packaging defect, we used a gain-of-function genetic approach whereby a heterologous NLS was inserted into Myr1E Gag, yielding mutant virus Myr1E.NLS. Our results revealed that restoring the nuclear trafficking of Myr1E Gag also restored the incorporation of gRNA into mutant virus particles.