Spatial distribution patterns of interphase centromeres during retinoic acid-induced differentiation of promyelocytic leukemia cells

BACKGROUND: The pericentromeric heterochromatin is an important element for the regulation of gene silencing. Its spatial distribution during interphase appears to be cell-type specific. This study analyzes three-dimensional (3D) centromere distribution patterns during cellular differentiation along the neutrophil pathway. METHODS: Differentiation of the promyelocytic leukemia cell line NB4 was induced by retinoic acid. Centromeres in interphase nuclei were visualized by immunofluorescence staining of centromere-associated proteins with CREST serum. 3D images of nuclei were obtained by confocal microscopy. Automated methods for the segmentation of point-like objects in 3D images were implemented to detect the position of centromeres. Features of centromere localization patterns were determined by constructing the minimal spanning tree of the centromere distribution. RESULTS: In differentiated NB4 cells, the number of centromere conglomerates (chromocenters) was decreased and the distance between chromocenters was increased as compared with untreated controls. The nuclear volume did not differ between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The measured rearrangement of centromeres indicates a progressive clustering of heterochromatin and a global remodeling of interphase chromosome territories during differentiation of NB4 cells. The developed methods for the analysis of 3D centromere distribution patterns provide the opportunity for a fast and objective analysis of heterochromatin remodeling.     

Organisation of complex nuclear domains in somatic mouse cells.

The number and associations of heterochromatin chromocenters, nucleoli, centromeres and telomeres were studied in the nucleus of different somatic cells of Mus domesticus. Fibroblasts of the cell line 3T3, kidney cells (primary culture), and bone marrow cells were used. The above mentioned nuclear and chromosome markers were identified by DAPI/actinomycin D, indirect immunofluorescence with anti-centromere antibodies, silver impregnation for nucleolar proteins and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) with telomeric probes. The quantitative analysis of the nuclei showed that the pericentromeric heterochromatin is organised in about 18 chromocenters per nucleus in the 3T3 cells, and about seven in kidney and bone marrow cells, having generally a peripheral distribution in the nucleus of all the studied cells. Several aggregated centromeres were participating in each of the chromocenters, about four centromeres per 3T3 cell and about six centromeres per kidney and bone marrow cells. Some of the chromocenters were also in close association with nucleoli. The number of telomeric labels per nucleus was as expected for each chromosome set (2n = 68-70 and 2n = 40). About half of the telomeric signals were loosely aggregated within the heterochromatic blocks while the rest were distributed in the nucleus as unrelated units not bound with chromocenters. The three cell types have complex nuclear territories formed by different chromosomal domains: the pericentromeric heterochromatin, centromeres, proximal telomeres and nucleoli. With the exception of some bone marrow cells, we have not found a nuclear polarisation of the analysed chromosomal markers compatible with the Rabl configuration. However, Rabl anaphasic polarisation allows the contact of centromeric regions making possible that centromeric associations arise. If in addition, associative elements such as constitutive heterochromatin or nucleoli are close to the centromeric regions, like in Mus domesticus chromosomes, then the associations might be consolidated and persist until the interphase. These associations may be the origin of the nuclear domains described here for Mus domesticus somatic cells.     

Three-dimensional localization and dynamics of centromeres in mouse oocytes during folliculogenesis

Very little is known about oocyte nuclear architecture during folliculogenesis. Using antibodies to reveal centromeres, Hoechst-staining to detect the AT-rich pericentromeric heterochromatin (chromocenters), combined with confocal microscopy for the three-dimensional analysis of the nucleus, we demonstrate that during mouse folliculogenesis the oocyte nuclear architecture undergoes dynamic changes. In oocytes isolated from primordial and primary follicles, centromeres and chromocenters were preferentially located at the periphery of the nucleus. During oocyte growth, centromeres and chromocenters were initially found spread within the nucleus and then progressively clustered around the periphery of the nucleolus. Our results indicate that the oocyte nuclear achitecture is developmentally regulated and they contribute to a further understanding of the role of nuclear organization in the regulation of genome functioning during differentiation and development.     

The radial positioning of chromatin is not inherited through mitosis but is established de novo in early G1

The organization of chromatin in the nucleus is nonrandom. Different genomic regions tend to reside in preferred nuclear locations, relative to radial position and nuclear compartments. Several lines of evidence support a role for chromatin localization in the regulation of gene expression. Therefore, a key problem is how the organization of chromatin is established and maintained in dividing cell populations. There is controversy about the extent to which chromatin organization is inherited from mother to daughter nucleus. We have used time-lapse microscopy to track specific human loci after exit from mitosis. In comparison to later stages of interphase, we detect increased chromatin mobility during the first 2 hr of G1, and during this period association of loci with nuclear compartments is both gained and lost. Although chromatin in daughter nuclei has a rough symmetry in its spatial distribution, we show, for the first time, that the association of loci with nuclear compartments displays significant asymmetry between daughter nuclei and therefore cannot be inherited from the mother nucleus. We conclude that the organization of chromatin in the nucleus is not passed down precisely from one cell to its descendents but is more plastic and becomes refined during early G1.     

Condensed chromatin and its underreplication during root differentiation in leguminosae

Interphase nuclear structure was studied in 15 leguminous species. Eleven species showed chromocentric interphase nuclei while the remaining 4 had reticulate nuclei. The number of chromocenters appeared to be dependent on the number of chromosomes (2n). The total proportion of condensed chromatin as determined by planimetry was found to vary from 11–24% in chromocentric nuclei and 29–62% in reticulate nuclei. The condensed chromatin amount showed a direct correlation with the nuclear DNA content (2C). Though the interphase nuclear structure remained same in differentiated cells, the amount of condensed chromatin was considerably less than that in the meristematic cells, indicating underreplication of heterochromatin during differentiation. HCl-Giemsa method seems to be the simplest method for detection of underreplication in plants.1. NCL Communication No. 35942. To whom all the correspondence should be addressed     

Reversible chromosome condensation induced in Drosophila embryos by anoxia: visualization of interphase nuclear organization

We have studied the morphology of nuclei in Drosophila embryos during the syncytial blastoderm stages. Nuclei in living embryos were viewed with differential interference-contrast optics; in addition, both isolated nuclei and fixed preparations of whole embryos were examined after staining with a DNA-specific fluorescent dye. We find that: (a) The nuclear volumes increase dramatically during interphase and then decrease during prophase of each nuclear cycle, with the magnitude of the nuclear volume increase being greatest for those cycles with the shortest interphase. (b) Oxygen deprivation of embryos produces a rapid developmental arrest that is reversible upon reaeration. During this arrest, interphase chromosomes condense against the nuclear envelope and the nuclear volumes increase dramatically. In these nuclei, individual chromosomes are clearly visible, and each condensed chromosome can be seen to adhere along its entire length to the inner surface of the swollen nuclear envelope, leaving the lumen of the nucleus devoid of DNA. (c) In each interphase nucleus the chromosomes are oriented in the "telophase configuration," with all centromeres and all telomeres at opposite poles of the nucleus; all nuclei at the embryo periphery (with the exception of the pole cell nuclei) are oriented with their centromeric poles pointing to the embryo exterior.     

Acrocentric centromere organization within the chromocenter of the human sperm nucleus.

It has recently been reported that in human sperm cells, the centromeres are clustered in a chromocenter in the interior region of the nucleus. The aim of the present study was to determine the intra-chromocenter organization of the five centromeres of the acrocentric chromosomes responsible for the biosynthesis of rRNA. The acrocentric centromeres were labeled by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) after mild decondensation of the sperm nuclei to preserve the tail structure. The tail was used as a topographical marker for the orientation of the nucleus. The following results were obtained: (a) the association among the five centromeres was higher than expected from random distribution; (b) all the centromeres observed were randomly located within the chromocenter, occupying about 87% of the total area of the internal nucleus; (c) a major subpopulation of centromeres was located in a preferred area occupying 8.3% of the total nuclear area, with a peak 0.6 microm on the lateral axis and 1.0 microm on the apical side of the longitudinal axis; and (d) The dispersion of the centromeres was not influenced by the degree of the nuclear decondensation. We conclude that in human sperm nuclei, the acrocentric centromeres are organized within a nonlocalized structural element in the chromocenter. The chromocenter can range from an expanded size of 87% of the whole nucleus to a preferred size of 8.3% independent of the degree of nuclear decondensation. These findings have important implications for nuclear function (rRNA) that is not directly related to sperm cell function or early embryo development.     

Architectural reorganization of the nuclei upon transfer into oocytes accompanies genome reprogramming

The ability of cloned embryos to sustain full-term development depends on the ability of the recipient ooplasm to reprogram the donor cell genome. As the nuclear architecture has recently emerged as a key-factor in the regulation of gene expression, we questioned whether early embryos obtained from transfer of ES metaphasic chromosomes into mouse ooplasm would adopt the somatic or embryonic type of nuclear organization. We have particularly focused on the arrangement of chromosomal territories with respect to the nucleolar compartment, and the pericentric heterochromatin domains called chromocenters. We found that nuclear transfer triggers profound chromatin rearrangements including the dispersion of the donor cell chromocenters components. These rearrangements lead to a typical 1-cell pronuclear organization, namely a radial arrangement of the chromosome territories with centromeres attached to the nucleoli, which adopt the compact fibrillar structure of nucleolar precursor bodies (NPBs). Subsequently, during the second cycle, the cloned embryos undergo further reorganization with the establishment of new chromocenters, clustered in one part of the nucleus, as during normal embryogenesis. We could also establish that the adequate distribution of chromosomal territories at the pronuclear stage seems important for the development until blastocyst.     

Differences in centromere positioning of cycling and postmitotic human cell types

Centromere positioning in human cell nuclei was traced in non-cycling peripheral blood lymphocytes (G0) and in terminally differentiated monocytes, as well as in cycling phytohemagglutinin-stimulated lymphocytes, diploid lymphoblastoid cells, normal fibroblasts, and neuroblastoma SH-EP cells using immunostaining of kinetochores, confocal microscopy and three-dimensional image analysis. Cell cycle stages were identified for each individual cell by a combination of replication labeling with 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine and immunostaining of pKi67. We demonstrate that the behavior of centromeres is similar in all cell types studied: a large fraction of centromeres are in the nuclear interior during early G1; in late G1 and early S phase, centromeres shift to the nuclear periphery and fuse in clusters. Peripheral location and clustering of centromeres are most pronounced in non-cycling cells (G0) and terminally differentiated monocytes. In late S and G2, centromeres partially decluster and migrate towards the nuclear interior. In the rather flat nuclei of adherently growing fibroblasts and neuroblastoma cells, kinetochores showed asymmetrical distributions with preferential kinetochore location close either to the bottom side of the nucleus (adjacent to the growth surface) or to the nuclear upper side. This asymmetrical distribution of centromeres is considered to be a consequence of chromosome arrangement in anaphase rosettes.     

Deposition,turnover, and release of CENH3 at <Emphasis Type="Italic">Arabidopsis</Emphasis> centromeres

The kinetochore is a complex multiprotein structure located at centromeres and required for the proper segregation of chromosomes during mitosis and meiosis. An important role in kinetochore assembly and function plays the centromeric histone H3 variant (CENH3). Cell cycle stage of CENH3 deposition to centromeres varies between different organisms. We confirmed by in vivo studies that deposition of Arabidopsis CENH3 takes place at centromeres during G2 and demonstrated that additionally a low turnover of CENH3 occurs along the cell cycle, apparently for replacement of damaged protein. Furthermore, enhanced yellow fluorescent protein (EYFP)-CENH3 of photobleached chromocenters is not replaced by EYFP-CENH3 molecules from unbleached centromeres of the same nucleus, indicating a stable incorporation of CENH3 into centromeric nucleosomes. In differentiated endopolyploid nuclei however, the amount of CENH3 at centromeres declines with age.     

Chromatin states and nuclear organization in development — a view from the nuclear lamina

The spatial distribution of chromatin domains in interphase nuclei changes dramatically during development in multicellular organisms. A crucial question is whether nuclear organization is a cause or a result of differentiation. Genetic perturbation of lamina–heterochromatin interactions is helping to reveal the cross-talk between chromatin states and nuclear organization.     

串叶松香草Giemsa C带和染色中心研究

以Giemsa C带技术处理串叶松香草根尖细胞染色体(2n=14),全部着丝点及第5和第7对染色体短臂端部显稳定的C带,第6对染色体长臂有两条明显的居间带,其他居间带小而不稳定(重复率不高)。间期细胞核染色体呈Rable构型,其着丝点一极最多出现20个染色中心。统计分析表明,靠近着丝点的短臂端带区和居间带区异染色质有易与着丝点区异染色质融合的倾向。分裂中期Giemsa C带数目与间期染色中心数目存在数量对应关系。     

Structure and function in the budding yeast nucleus

Budding yeast, like other eukaryotes, carries its genetic information on chromosomes that are sequestered from other cellular constituents by a double membrane, which forms the nucleus. An elaborate molecular machinery forms large pores that span the double membrane and regulate the traffic of macromolecules into and out of the nucleus. In multicellular eukaryotes, an intermediate filament meshwork formed of lamin proteins bridges from pore to pore and helps the nucleus reform after mitosis. Yeast, however, lacks lamins, and the nuclear envelope is not disrupted during yeast mitosis. The mitotic spindle nucleates from the nucleoplasmic face of the spindle pole body, which is embedded in the nuclear envelope. Surprisingly, the kinetochores remain attached to short microtubules throughout interphase, influencing the position of centromeres in the interphase nucleus, and telomeres are found clustered in foci at the nuclear periphery. In addition to this chromosomal organization, the yeast nucleus is functionally compartmentalized to allow efficient gene expression, repression, RNA processing, genomic replication, and repair. The formation of functional subcompartments is achieved in the nucleus without intranuclear membranes and depends instead on sequence elements, protein-protein interactions, specific anchorage sites at the nuclear envelope or at pores, and long-range contacts between specific chromosomal loci, such as telomeres. Here we review the spatial organization of the budding yeast nucleus, the proteins involved in forming nuclear subcompartments, and evidence suggesting that the spatial organization of the nucleus is important for nuclear function.     

Specific radial positions of centromeres of human chromosomes X, 1, and 19 remain unchanged in chromatin-depleted nuclei of primary human fibroblasts: evidence for the organizing role of the nuclear matrix

Radial positions of centromeres of human chromosomes X, 1, and 19 were determined in the nuclei of primary fibroblasts before and after removal of 60%-80% of chromatin. It has been demonstrated that the specific radial positions of these centromeres (more central for the chromosome 19 centromere and more peripheral for the centromeres of chromosomes 1 and X) remain unchanged in chromatin-depleted nuclei. Additional digestion of nuclear RNA did not influence this specific distribution. These results strongly suggest that the characteristic organization of interphase chromosomes is supported by the proteinous nuclear matrix and is not maintained by simple repulsing of negatively charged chromosomes.