Bovine Coronavirus Nonstructural Protein 1 (p28) Is an RNA Binding Protein That Binds Terminal Genomic cis-Replication Elements

Nonstructural protein 1 (nsp1), a 28-kDa protein in the bovine coronavirus (BCoV) and closely related mouse hepatitis coronavirus, is the first protein cleaved from the open reading frame 1 (ORF 1) polyprotein product of genome translation. Recently, a 30-nucleotide (nt) cis-replication stem-loop VI (SLVI) has been mapped at nt 101 to 130 within a 288-nt 5′-terminal segment of the 738-nt nsp1 cistron in a BCoV defective interfering (DI) RNA. Since a similar nsp1 coding region appears in all characterized groups 1 and 2 coronavirus DI RNAs and must be translated in cis for BCoV DI RNA replication, we hypothesized that nsp1 might regulate ORF 1 expression by binding this intra-nsp1 cistronic element. Here, we (i) establish by mutation analysis that the 72-nt intracistronic SLV immediately upstream of SLVI is also a DI RNA cis-replication signal, (ii) show by gel shift and UV-cross-linking analyses that cellular proteins of ∼60 and 100 kDa, but not viral proteins, bind SLV and SLVI, (SLV-VI) and (iii) demonstrate by gel shift analysis that nsp1 purified from Escherichia coli does not bind SLV-VI but does bind three 5′ untranslated region (UTR)- and one 3′ UTR-located cis-replication SLs. Notably, nsp1 specifically binds SLIII and its flanking sequences in the 5′ UTR with ∼2.5 μM affinity. Additionally, under conditions enabling expression of nsp1 from DI RNA-encoded subgenomic mRNA, DI RNA levels were greatly reduced, but there was only a slight transient reduction in viral RNA levels. These results together indicate that nsp1 is an RNA-binding protein that may function to regulate viral genome translation or replication but not by binding SLV-VI within its own coding region.Coronaviruses (CoVs) (59) cause primarily respiratory and gastroenteric diseases in birds and mammals (35, 71). In humans, they most commonly cause mild upper respiratory disease, but the recently discovered human CoVs (HCoVs), HCoV-NL63 (65), HCoV-HKU1 (73), and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-CoV (40) cause serious diseases in the upper and lower respiratory tracts. The SARS-CoV causes pneumonia with an accompanying high (∼10%) mortality rate (69). The ∼30-kb positive-strand CoV genome, the largest known among RNA viruses, is 5′ capped and 3′ polyadenylated and replicates in the cytoplasm (41). As with other characterized cytoplasmically replicating positive-strand RNA viruses (3), translation of the CoV genome is an early step in replication, and terminally located cis-acting RNA signals regulate translation and direct genome replication (41). How these happen mechanistically in CoVs is only beginning to be understood.In the highly studied group 2 mouse hepatitis coronavirus model (MHV A59 strain) and its close relative the bovine CoV (BCoV Mebus strain), five higher-order cis-replication signals have been identified in the 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions (UTRs). These include two in the 5′ UTR required for BCoV defective interfering (DI) RNA replication (Fig. ​(Fig.1A)1A) described as stem-loop III (SLIII) (50) and SLIV (51). Recently, the SLI region in BCoV (15) has been reanalyzed along with the homologous region in MHV and is now described as comprising SL1 and SL2 (Fig. ​(Fig.1A),1A), of which SL2 has been shown to be a cis-replication structure in the context of the MHV genome (38). In the 3′ UTR, two higher-order cis-replication structures have been identified that function in both DI RNA and the MHV genome. These are a 5′-proximal bulged SL and adjacent pseudoknot that potentially act together as a unit (23, 27, 28, 72) and a 3′-proximal octamer-associated bulged SL (39, 76) (Fig. ​(Fig.1A).1A). In addition, the 5′-terminal 65-nucleotide (nt) leader and the 3′-terminal poly(A) tail have been shown to be cis-replication signals for BCoV DI RNA (15, 60).Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.RNA structures in the BCoV genome tested for nsp1 binding. (A) BCoV 5′-terminal and 3′-terminal cis-acting RNA SL structures and flanking sequences identified for BCoV DI RNA replication. Regions of the genome are identified and SL cis-replication elements are identified schematically. Open boxes at nt 100 and 211 identify AUG start codons for the short upstream ORF and ORF 1, respectively. A closed box at nt 124 identifies the UAG stop codon for the short upstream ORF. Shown below the SL structures are the RNA segments used as ³²P-labeled probes in the gel shift assays. BSL-PK, bulged SL-pseudoknot; 8mer-BSL, octamer-associated bulged SL. (B) Gel shift assays for probes when used with purified nsp1. Protein-RNA complexes identifying a shifted probe are labeled C.In CoVs, the 5′-proximal open reading frame (ORF) of ∼20 kb (called ORF 1) comprising the 5′ two-thirds of the genome is translated to overlapping polyproteins of ∼500 and ∼700 kDa, named pp1a and pp1ab (41). pp1ab is formed by a −1 ribosomal frameshift event at the ORF1a-ORF1b junction during translation (41). pp1a and pp1ab are proteolytically processed into potentially 16 nonstructural protein (nsp) end products or partial end products that are proposed to function together as the replicase (24). ORF 1a encodes nsps 1 to 11 which include papain-like proteases (nsp3), a 3C-like main protease (nsp5), membrane-anchoring proteins (nsps 4 and 6), a potential primase (nsp8), and RNA-binding proteins (nsp 7/nsp 8 complex and nsps 9 and 10) of imprecisely understood function (19, 20, 24, 25, 29, 43, 49, 77). ORF 1b encodes nsps 12 to 16 which function as an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, a helicase, an exonuclease, an endonuclease, and a 2′-O-methyltransferase, respectively (6, 17, 24, 44). 3′ Proximal genomic ORFs encoding structural and accessory proteins are translated from a 3′-nested set of subgenomic mRNAs (sgmRNAs) (41).The N-terminal ORF 1a protein, nsp1, in the case of BCoV and MHV is also named p28 to identify the cleaved 28-kDa product (18). The precise role of nsp1 in virus replication has not been determined, but it is known that a sequence encoding an N-proximal nsp1 region in MHV (nt 255 to 369 in the 738-nt coding sequence) cannot be deleted from the genome without loss of productive infection (10). nsp1 also directly binds nsp7 and nsp10 (11) and by confocal microscopy is found associated with the membranous replication complex (10, 66) and virus assembly sites (11). The amino acid sequence of nsp1 is poorly conserved among CoVs, indicating that it may be a protein that interacts with cellular components (1, 58). In the absence of other viral proteins, MHV nsp1 induces general host mRNA degradation (79) and cell cycle arrest (16). The SARS-CoV nsp1 homolog, a 20-kDa protein, has been reported to cause mRNA degradation (30, 45), inhibition of host protein synthesis (30, 45, 70), inhibition of interferon signaling (70, 79), and cytokine dysregulation in lung cells (36).In this study, we examine the RNA-binding properties of BCoV nsp1 with the hypothesis that it is a potential regulator of translation or replication through its binding of SLVI mapping within its coding region. The rationale for this hypothesis stems from five observations. (i) In the BCoV DI RNA, the 5′-terminal one-third (approximately) of the nsp1 cistron and the entire nucleocapsid (N) protein cistron together comprise the single contiguous ORF in the DI RNA, and most of both coding regions appear required for DI RNA replication (15). (ii) The partial nsp1 cistron in the DI RNA must be translated in cis for DI RNA replication in helper virus-infected cells (12, 14). (iii) A similar part of the nsp1 cistron is found in the genome of all characterized naturally occurring group 1 and 2 CoV DI RNAs described to date (7, 8). (iv) A cis-acting SL named SLVI is found within the partial nsp1 cistron in the BCoV DI RNA (12). (v) Translation, which involves a 5′→3′ transit of ribosomes, and negative-strand synthesis, which involves a 3′→5′ transit of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, cannot simultaneously occur on the same molecule with a single ORF (4, 31). Thus, to enable genome replication an inhibition of translation at least early in infection for cytoplasmically replicating positive-strand RNA viruses is required (4, 5, 22, 32). Mechanisms of translation inhibition have been described for the Qβ viral genome, wherein the viral replicase autoregulates translation by binding an intracistronic cis-replication element (32), and for the polio virus genome, wherein genome circularization inhibits the early translation step (5, 22). Therefore, since nsp1 is synthesized early and also contains an intracistronic cis-replication element, we postulated that it is autoregulatory with RNA binding properties.Here, we do the following: (i) demonstrate by mutagenesis analysis that the 72-nt SLV, mapping immediately upstream of SLVI and within the partial nsp1 cistron, is also a cis-acting DI RNA replication element; (ii) show by gel shift and UV cross-linking analyses that there is likely no binding of an intracellular viral protein to SLV and SLVI (SLV-VI), but there is binding of unidentified cellular proteins of ∼60 and 100 kDa; and (iii) show by gel shift analysis that recombinant nsp1 purified from Escherichia coli does not bind SLV-VI but does bind SLs I to IV in the 5′ UTR and also the 3′-terminal bulged SL in the 3′ UTR, suggesting a possible regulatory role at these sites. Notably, specific binding with ∼2.5 μM affinity of nsp1 to SLIII and its flanking regions in the 5′ UTR was observed. Additionally, we show that, under conditions that would express nsp1 from a DI RNA-encoded sgmRNA, DI RNA levels are greatly reduced; viral RNA species levels, however, are reduced only slightly, and this reduction is transient. These results together indicate that nsp1 is an RNA-binding protein that may function as a regulator of viral translation or replication but not through its binding of cis-acting SLs V and VI within its own cistron.     

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Structure of the Nucleic Acid-Binding Domain of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Nonstructural Protein 3

The nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) structure of a globular domain of residues 1071 to 1178 within the previously annotated nucleic acid-binding region (NAB) of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus nonstructural protein 3 (nsp3) has been determined, and N- and C-terminally adjoining polypeptide segments of 37 and 25 residues, respectively, have been shown to form flexibly extended linkers to the preceding globular domain and to the following, as yet uncharacterized domain. This extension of the structural coverage of nsp3 was obtained from NMR studies with an nsp3 construct comprising residues 1066 to 1181 [nsp3(1066-1181)] and the constructs nsp3(1066-1203) and nsp3(1035-1181). A search of the protein structure database indicates that the globular domain of the NAB represents a new fold, with a parallel four-strand β-sheet holding two α-helices of three and four turns that are oriented antiparallel to the β-strands. Two antiparallel two-strand β-sheets and two 3₁₀-helices are anchored against the surface of this barrel-like molecular core. Chemical shift changes upon the addition of single-stranded RNAs (ssRNAs) identified a group of residues that form a positively charged patch on the protein surface as the binding site responsible for the previously reported affinity for nucleic acids. This binding site is similar to the ssRNA-binding site of the sterile alpha motif domain of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Vts1p protein, although the two proteins do not share a common globular fold.The coronavirus replication cycle begins with the translation of the 29-kb positive-strand genomic RNA to produce two large polyprotein species (pp1a and pp1ab), which are subsequently cleaved to produce 15 or possibly 16 nonstructural proteins (nsp''s) (11). Among these, nsp3 is the largest nsp and also the largest coronavirus protein. nsp3 is a glycosylated (16, 22), multidomain (36, 51), integral membrane protein (38). All known coronaviruses encode a homologue of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) nsp3, and sequence analysis suggests that at least some functions of nsp3 may be found in all members of the order Nidovirales (11). Hallmarks of the coronavirus nsp3 proteins include one or two papain-like proteinase domains (3, 12, 16, 31, 56, 62), one to three histone H2A-like macrodomains which may bind RNA or RNA-like substrates (5, 9, 48, 54, 55), and a carboxyl-terminal Y domain of unknown function (13). An extensive bioinformatics analysis of the coronavirus replicase proteins by Snijder et al. (51) provided detailed annotations of the then-recently sequenced SARS-CoV genome (35, 47), including the identification of a domain unique to SARS-CoV and the prediction of the ADP-ribose-1″-phosphatase (ADRP) activity of the X domain (since shown to be one of the macrodomains).Only limited information is so far available regarding the ways in which the functions of nsp3 are involved in the coronavirus replication cycle. Some functions of nsp3 appear to be directed toward protein; e.g., the nsp3 proteinase domain cleaves the amino-terminal two or three nsp''s from the polyprotein and has deubiquitinating activity (4, 6, 14, 30, 53, 60). Most homologues of the most conserved macrodomain of nsp3 appear to possess ADRP activity (9, 34, 41-43, 48, 59) and may act on protein-conjugated poly(ADP-ribose); however, this function appears to be dispensable for replication (10, 42) and may not be conserved in all coronaviruses (41). The potential involvement of nsp3 in RNA replication is suggested by the presence of several RNA-binding domains (5, 36, 49, 54, 55). nsp3 has been identified in convoluted membrane structures that are also associated with other replicase proteins and that have been shown to be involved in viral RNA synthesis (16, 24, 52), and nsp3 papain-like proteinase activity is essential for replication (14, 62). Other conserved structural features of nsp3 include two ubiquitin-like domains (UB1 and UB2) (45, 49). We have also recently reported that nsp3 is a structural protein, since it was identified as a minor component of purified SARS-CoV preparations, although it is not known whether nsp3 is directly involved in virogenesis or is incidentally incorporated due to protein-protein or protein-RNA interactions (36).A nucleic acid-binding region (NAB) is located within the polypeptide segment of residues 1035 to 1203 of nsp3. The NAB is expected to be located in the cytoplasm, along with the papain-like protease, ADRP, a region unique to SARS-CoV (the SARS-CoV unique domain [SUD]), and nsp3a, since both the N and C termini of nsp3 were shown previously to be cytoplasmic (38). Two hydrophobic segments are membrane spanning (38), and the NAB is located roughly 200 residues in the N-terminal direction from the first membrane-spanning segment. This paper presents the next step in the structural coverage of nsp3, with the determination of the NAB structure. The structural studies included nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) characterization of two constructs, an nsp3 construct comprising residues 1035 to 1181 [nsp3(1035-1181)] and nsp3(1066-1203), and complete NMR structure determination for the construct nsp3(1066-1181) (see Fig. ​Fig.8).8). The structural data were then used as a platform from which to investigate the nature of the previously reported single-stranded RNA (ssRNA)-binding activity of the NAB (36). Since no three-dimensional (3D) structures for the corresponding domains in other group II coronaviruses are known and since the SARS-CoV NAB has only very-low-level sequence identity to other proteins, such data could not readily be derived from comparisons with structurally and functionally characterized homologues.Open in a separate windowFIG. 8.Sequence alignment of the polypeptide segment nsp3(1066-1181) that forms the globular domain of the SARS-CoV NAB with homologues from other group II coronaviruses. Protein multiple-sequence alignment was performed using ClustalW2 and included sequences from SARS-CoV Tor2 (accession no. {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"AAP41036","term_id":"30795144","term_text":"AAP41036"}}AAP41036) and representatives of three protein clusters corresponding to three group II coronavirus lineages identified by a BLAST search: bat coronavirus HKU5-5 (BtCoV-HKU5-5; accession no. {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"ABN10901","term_id":"124389468","term_text":"ABN10901"}}ABN10901), BtCoV-HKU9-1 (accession no. {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"P0C6T6","term_id":"190360129","term_text":"P0C6T6"}}P0C6T6), and human coronavirus HKU1-N16 (HCoV-HKU1-N16; accession no. {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"ABD75496","term_id":"89515407","term_text":"ABD75496"}}ABD75496). Above the sequences, the positions in full-length SARS-CoV nsp3, the locations of the regular secondary structures in the presently solved NMR structure of the SARS-CoV NAB globular domain, and the residue numbering in this domain are indicated. Amino acids are colored according to conservation and biochemical properties, following ClustalW conventions. Residues implicated in interactions with ssRNA are marked with inverted black triangles. In the present context, the key features are that there is only one position with conservation of K or R (red) and that there are extended sequences with conservation of hydrophobic residues (blue) (see the text).     

Investigation of Clade B New World Arenavirus Tropism by Using Chimeric GP1 Proteins

Clade B of the New World arenaviruses contains both pathogenic and nonpathogenic members, whose surface glycoproteins (GPs) are characterized by different abilities to use the human transferrin receptor type 1 (hTfR1) protein as a receptor. Using closely related pairs of pathogenic and nonpathogenic viruses, we investigated the determinants of the GP1 subunit that confer these different characteristics. We identified a central region (residues 85 to 221) in the Guanarito virus GP1 that was sufficient to interact with hTfR1, with residues 159 to 221 being essential. The recently solved structure of part of the Machupo virus GP1 suggests an explanation for these requirements.Arenaviruses are bisegmented, single-stranded RNA viruses that use an ambisense coding strategy to express four proteins: NP (nucleoprotein), Z (matrix protein), L (polymerase), and GP (glycoprotein). The viral GP is sufficient to direct entry into host cells, and retroviral vectors pseudotyped with GP recapitulate the entry pathway of these viruses (5, 13, 24, 31). GP is a class I fusion protein comprising two subunits, GP1 and GP2, cleaved from the precursor protein GPC (4, 14, 16, 18, 21). GP1 contains the receptor binding domain (19, 28), while GP2 contains structural elements characteristic of viral membrane fusion proteins (8, 18, 20, 38). The N-terminal stable signal peptide (SSP) remains associated with the mature glycoprotein after cleavage (2, 39) and plays a role in transport, maturation, and pH-dependent fusion (17, 35, 36, 37).The New World arenaviruses are divided into clades A, B, and C based on phylogenetic relatedness (7, 9, 11). Clade B contains the human pathogenic viruses Junin (JUNV), Machupo (MACV), Guanarito (GTOV), Sabia, and Chapare, which cause severe hemorrhagic fevers in South America (1, 10, 15, 26, 34). Clade B also contains the nonpathogenic viruses Amapari (AMAV), Cupixi, and Tacaribe (TCRV), although mild disease has been reported for a laboratory worker infected with TCRV (29).Studies with both viruses and GP-pseudotyped retroviral vectors have shown that the pathogenic clade B arenaviruses use the human transferrin receptor type 1 (hTfR1) to gain entry into human cells (19, 30). In contrast, GPs from nonpathogenic viruses, although capable of using TfR1 orthologs from other species (1), cannot use hTfR1 (1, 19) and instead enter human cells through as-yet-uncharacterized hTfR1-independent pathways (19). In addition, human T-cell lines serve as useful tools to distinguish these GPs, since JUNV, GTOV, and MACV pseudotyped vectors readily transduce CEM cells, while TCRV and AMAV GP vectors do not (27; also unpublished data). These properties of the GPs do not necessarily reflect a tropism of the pathogenic viruses for human T cells, since viral tropism is influenced by many factors and T cells are not a target for JUNV replication in vivo (3, 22, 25).     

DivIC Stabilizes FtsL against RasP Cleavage

The essential cell division protein FtsL is a substrate of the intramembrane protease RasP. Using heterologous coexpression experiments, we show here that the division protein DivIC stabilizes FtsL against RasP cleavage. Degradation seems to be initiated upon accessibility of a cytosolic substrate recognition motif.Cell division in bacteria is a highly regulated process (1). The division site selection as well as assembly and disassembly of the divisome have to be strictly controlled (1, 4). Although the spatial control of the divisome is relatively well understood (2, 4, 14, 17), mechanisms governing the temporal control of division are still mainly elusive. Regulatory proteolysis was thought to be a potential modulatory mechanism (8, 9). The highly unstable division protein FtsL was shown to be rate limiting for division and would make an ideal candidate for a regulatory factor in the timing of bacterial cell division (7, 9). In Bacillus subtilis, FtsL is an essential protein of the membrane part of the divisome (5, 7, 8). It is necessary for the assembly of the membrane-spanning division proteins, and a knockout is lethal (8, 9, 12). We have previously reported that FtsL is a substrate of the intramembrane protease RasP (5).These findings raised the question of whether RasP can regulate cell division by cleaving FtsL from the division complex. In order to mimic the situation in which FtsL is bound to at least one of its interaction partners, we used a heterologous coexpression system in which we synthesized FtsL and DivIC. It has been reported before that DivIC and FtsL are intimate binding partners in various organisms (6, 9, 15, 21, 22, 26) and that FtsL and DivIC (together with DivIB) can form complexes even in the absence of the other divisome components (6, 21). We therefore asked whether RasP is able to cleave FtsL in the presence of its major interaction partner DivIC, which would argue for the possibility that RasP could cleave FtsL within a mature divisome. In contrast, if interaction with DivIC could stabilize FtsL against RasP cleavage, this result would bring such a model into question. An alternative option for the role of RasP might be the removal of FtsL from the membrane. It has been shown that divisome disassembly and prevention of reassembly are crucial to prevent minicell formation close to the new cell poles (3, 16).     

Ecoepidemiology and Complete Genome Comparison of Different Strains of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Related Rhinolophus Bat Coronavirus in China Reveal Bats as a Reservoir for Acute,Self-Limiting Infection That Allows Recombination Events

Despite the identification of severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus (SARSr-CoV) in Rhinolophus Chinese horseshoe bats (SARSr-Rh-BatCoV) in China, the evolutionary and possible recombination origin of SARSr-CoV remains undetermined. We carried out the first study to investigate the migration pattern and SARSr-Rh-BatCoV genome epidemiology in Chinese horseshoe bats during a 4-year period. Of 1,401 Chinese horseshoe bats from Hong Kong and Guangdong, China, that were sampled, SARSr-Rh-BatCoV was detected in alimentary specimens from 130 (9.3%) bats, with peak activity during spring. A tagging exercise of 511 bats showed migration distances from 1.86 to 17 km. Bats carrying SARSr-Rh-BatCoV appeared healthy, with viral clearance occurring between 2 weeks and 4 months. However, lower body weights were observed in bats positive for SARSr-Rh-BatCoV, but not Rh-BatCoV HKU2. Complete genome sequencing of 10 SARSr-Rh-BatCoV strains showed frequent recombination between different strains. Moreover, recombination was detected between SARSr-Rh-BatCoV Rp3 from Guangxi, China, and Rf1 from Hubei, China, in the possible generation of civet SARSr-CoV SZ3, with a breakpoint at the nsp16/spike region. Molecular clock analysis showed that SARSr-CoVs were newly emerged viruses with the time of the most recent common ancestor (tMRCA) at 1972, which diverged between civet and bat strains in 1995. The present data suggest that SARSr-Rh-BatCoV causes acute, self-limiting infection in horseshoe bats, which serve as a reservoir for recombination between strains from different geographical locations within reachable foraging range. Civet SARSr-CoV is likely a recombinant virus arising from SARSr-CoV strains closely related to SARSr-Rh-BatCoV Rp3 and Rf1. Such frequent recombination, coupled with rapid evolution especially in ORF7b/ORF8 region, in these animals may have accounted for the cross-species transmission and emergence of SARS.Coronaviruses can infect a wide variety of animals, causing respiratory, enteric, hepatic, and neurological diseases with different degrees of severity. On the basis of genotypic and serological characteristics, coronaviruses were classified into three distinct groups (2, 20, 54). Among coronaviruses that infect humans, human coronavirus 229E (HCoV-229E) and human coronavirus NL63 (HCoV-NL63) belong to group 1 coronaviruses and human coronavirus OC43 (HCoV-OC43), and human coronavirus HKU1 (HCoV-HKU1) belong to group 2 coronaviruses, whereas severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus (SARSr-CoV) has been classified as a group 2b coronavirus, distantly related to group 2a, and the recently discovered group 2c and 2d coronaviruses (6, 8, 10, 18, 31, 38, 43, 46, 49, 50). Recently, the Coronavirus Study Group of the International Committee for Taxonomy of Viruses has proposed renaming the traditional group 1, 2, and 3 coronaviruses Alphacoronavirus, Betacoronavirus, and Gammacoronavirus, respectively (http://talk.ictvonline.org/media/p/1230.aspx).Among all coronaviruses, SARSr-CoV has caused the most severe disease in humans, with over 700 fatalities since the SARS epidemic in 2003. Although the identification of SARSr-CoV in Himalayan palm civets and raccoon dogs in live animal markets in southern China suggested that wild animals could be the origin of SARS (11), the presence of the virus in only market or farmed civets, but not civets in the wild, and the rapid evolution of SARSr-CoV genomes in market civets suggested that these caged animals were only intermediate hosts (24, 39, 42, 52). Since bats are commonly found and served in wild animal markets and restaurants in Guangdong, China (47), we have previously carried out a study of bats from the region and identified a SARSr-CoV in Rhinolophus Chinese horseshoe bats (SARSr-Rh-BatCoV) (21). Similar viruses have also been found in three other species of horseshoe bats in mainland China (25), supporting the hypothesis that horseshoe bats are a reservoir of SARSr-CoV. Recently, viruses closely related to SARSr-Rh-BatCoV in China were also reported in Chaerophon bats from Africa, although only partial RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) sequences were available (41). In addition, more than 10 previously unrecognized coronaviruses of huge diversity have since been identified in bats from China and other countries (1, 3, 5, 9, 22, 27, 32, 33, 40, 46, 51), suggesting that bats play an important role in the ecology and evolution of coronaviruses.As a result of the unique mechanism of viral replication, coronaviruses have a high frequency of recombination (20). Such a high recombination rate, coupled with the infidelity of the polymerases of RNA viruses, may allow them to adapt to new hosts and ecological niches (12, 48). Recombination in coronaviruses was first recognized between different strains of murine hepatitis virus (MHV) and subsequently in other coronaviruses, such as infectious bronchitis virus, between MHV and bovine coronavirus, and between feline coronavirus type I and canine coronavirus generating feline coronavirus type II (12, 16, 17, 23). Recently, by complete genome analysis of 22 strains of HCoV-HKU1, we have also documented for the first time that natural recombination events in a human coronavirus can give rise to three different genotypes (48).Although previous studies have attempted to study the possible evolutionary and recombination origin of SARSr-CoV, no definite conclusion can be made on whether the viruses from bats are the direct ancestor of SARSr-CoV in civets and humans, given the paucity of available strains and genome sequences. To better define the epidemiology and evolution of SARSr-Rh-BatCoV in China and their role as a recombination origin of SARSr-CoV in civets, we carried out a 4-year study on coronaviruses in Chinese horseshoe bats in Hong Kong and Guangdong Province of southern China. Bat tagging was also performed to study the migration pattern of bats and viral persistence. The complete genomes of 10 strains of SARSr-Rh-BatCoV obtained at different time were sequenced and compared to previously sequenced genomes. With the availability of this larger set of genome sequences for more accurate analysis, recombination and molecular clock analyses were performed to elucidate the evolutionary origin and time of interspecies transmission of SARSr-CoV.     

Alignment of the c-Type Cytochrome OmcS along Pili of Geobacter sulfurreducens

Immunogold localization revealed that OmcS, a cytochrome that is required for Fe(III) oxide reduction by Geobacter sulfurreducens, was localized along the pili. The apparent spacing between OmcS molecules suggests that OmcS facilitates electron transfer from pili to Fe(III) oxides rather than promoting electron conduction along the length of the pili.There are multiple competing/complementary models for extracellular electron transfer in Fe(III)- and electrode-reducing microorganisms (8, 18, 20, 44). Which mechanisms prevail in different microorganisms or environmental conditions may greatly influence which microorganisms compete most successfully in sedimentary environments or on the surfaces of electrodes and can impact practical decisions on the best strategies to promote Fe(III) reduction for bioremediation applications (18, 19) or to enhance the power output of microbial fuel cells (18, 21).The three most commonly considered mechanisms for electron transfer to extracellular electron acceptors are (i) direct contact between redox-active proteins on the outer surfaces of the cells and the electron acceptor, (ii) electron transfer via soluble electron shuttling molecules, and (iii) the conduction of electrons along pili or other filamentous structures. Evidence for the first mechanism includes the necessity for direct cell-Fe(III) oxide contact in Geobacter species (34) and the finding that intensively studied Fe(III)- and electrode-reducing microorganisms, such as Geobacter sulfurreducens and Shewanella oneidensis MR-1, display redox-active proteins on their outer cell surfaces that could have access to extracellular electron acceptors (1, 2, 12, 15, 27, 28, 31-33). Deletion of the genes for these proteins often inhibits Fe(III) reduction (1, 4, 7, 15, 17, 28, 40) and electron transfer to electrodes (5, 7, 11, 33). In some instances, these proteins have been purified and shown to have the capacity to reduce Fe(III) and other potential electron acceptors in vitro (10, 13, 29, 38, 42, 43, 48, 49).Evidence for the second mechanism includes the ability of some microorganisms to reduce Fe(III) that they cannot directly contact, which can be associated with the accumulation of soluble substances that can promote electron shuttling (17, 22, 26, 35, 36, 47). In microbial fuel cell studies, an abundance of planktonic cells and/or the loss of current-producing capacity when the medium is replaced is consistent with the presence of an electron shuttle (3, 14, 26). Furthermore, a soluble electron shuttle is the most likely explanation for the electrochemical signatures of some microorganisms growing on an electrode surface (26, 46).Evidence for the third mechanism is more circumstantial (19). Filaments that have conductive properties have been identified in Shewanella (7) and Geobacter (41) species. To date, conductance has been measured only across the diameter of the filaments, not along the length. The evidence that the conductive filaments were involved in extracellular electron transfer in Shewanella was the finding that deletion of the genes for the c-type cytochromes OmcA and MtrC, which are necessary for extracellular electron transfer, resulted in nonconductive filaments, suggesting that the cytochromes were associated with the filaments (7). However, subsequent studies specifically designed to localize these cytochromes revealed that, although the cytochromes were extracellular, they were attached to the cells or in the exopolymeric matrix and not aligned along the pili (24, 25, 30, 40, 43). Subsequent reviews of electron transfer to Fe(III) in Shewanella oneidensis (44, 45) appear to have dropped the nanowire concept and focused on the first and second mechanisms.Geobacter sulfurreducens has a number of c-type cytochromes (15, 28) and multicopper proteins (12, 27) that have been demonstrated or proposed to be on the outer cell surface and are essential for extracellular electron transfer. Immunolocalization and proteolysis studies demonstrated that the cytochrome OmcB, which is essential for optimal Fe(III) reduction (15) and highly expressed during growth on electrodes (33), is embedded in the outer membrane (39), whereas the multicopper protein OmpB, which is also required for Fe(III) oxide reduction (27), is exposed on the outer cell surface (39).OmcS is one of the most abundant cytochromes that can readily be sheared from the outer surfaces of G. sulfurreducens cells (28). It is essential for the reduction of Fe(III) oxide (28) and for electron transfer to electrodes under some conditions (11). Therefore, the localization of this important protein was further investigated.     

The Spike Protein of Murine Coronavirus Regulates Viral Genome Transport from the Cell Surface to the Endoplasmic Reticulum during Infection

We observed that the nonfusogenic mouse hepatitis virus (MHV) strain MHV-2 reached a titer of ∼2 log₁₀ higher than that of the fusogenic strain A59 in astrocytoma DBT cells. To determine whether the spike protein is responsible for the difference, a recombinant virus, Penn-98-1, that contains the A59 genome with a spike from MHV-2 was used to infect DBT cells. Results showed that Penn-98-1 behaved like MHV-2, thus establishing a role for the spike protein in viral growth. The inverse correlation between viral fusogenicity and growth was further established in four different cell types and with a fusogenic mutant, the S757R mutant, derived from isogenic Penn-98-1. While both A59 and Penn-98-1 entered cells at similar levels, viral RNA and protein syntheses were significantly delayed for A59. Interestingly, when the genomic RNAs were delivered directly into the cells via transfection, the levels of gene expression for these viruses were similar. Furthermore, cell fractionation experiments revealed that significantly more genomic RNAs for the nonfusogenic MHVs were detected in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) within the first 2 h after infection than for the fusogenic MHVs. Pretreatment of Penn-98-1 with trypsin reversed its properties in syncytium formation, virus production, and genome transport to the ER. These findings identified a novel role for the spike protein in regulating the uncoating and delivery of the viral genome to the ER after internalization.Murine coronavirus mouse hepatitis virus (MHV) is a member of the family Coronaviridae. It is an enveloped, positive-strand-RNA virus. The viral envelope contains three or four structural proteins, depending on the virus strain (21). The spike (S) protein is a glycoprotein with a molecular mass of approximately 180 kDa. For some MHV strains, such as JHM and A59, the S protein is cleaved by a furin-like proteinase into two subunits, the amino-terminal S1 and the carboxyl-terminal S2. The S1 subunit is thought to form the globular head of the spike and is responsible for the initial attachment of the virus to the receptor on the cell surface. The S2 subunit, which forms the stalk portion of the spike and which anchors the S protein to the viral envelope, facilitates the fusion between the viral envelope and the cell membrane and cell-cell fusion (4, 7, 20, 25, 39). In contrast, the S protein of some other MHV strains, such as MHV-2, does not undergo cleavage and usually does not cause cell-cell fusion (15, 34). It appears that the cleavability of the MHV S protein is associated usually, though not always, with its fusogenicity (10, 36). It has been suggested that the fusogenicity of the S protein may determine the route of virus entry, i.e., via direct fusion with plasma membranes or following endocytosis (11, 34), although the mechanism for virus-induced cell-cell fusion may differ from that for virus-cell fusion during entry (8). The S protein also elicits the induction of neutralizing antibodies and cell-mediated immunity in infected hosts (3). It is therefore an important determinant for viral infectivity, pathogenicity, and virulence (2, 5, 31, 38). The hemagglutinin-esterase (HE) protein is present only in certain MHV strains (22, 42) and may play a role in viral pathogenesis (44, 45). The small envelope (E) protein and the membrane (M) protein play a key role in virus assembly (40). The nucleocapsid (N) protein is a phosphoprotein of approximately 50 kDa and is associated with the RNA genome to form the nucleocapsid inside the envelope (21, 37).Infection of host cells by MHV is mediated through the interaction between the S protein and the cellular receptors that are members of the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) family of the immunoglobulin superfamily (9). This interaction then triggers fusion between the viral envelope and the plasma membrane or the endosomal membrane, the latter of which follows receptor-mediated endocytosis, thus allowing the nucleocapsid to deliver into the cytoplasm. Direct entry from the plasma membrane appears to be the predominant route for most MHV strains (19, 28), although entry by some mutant MHVs, such as OBLV60 and MHV-2, is low pH dependent, i.e., via endocytosis (11, 34). However, nothing is known about how the genomic RNA is transported to the rough endoplasmic reticulum (ER) for translation. Once on the ER, the viral genomic RNA is translated into a polymerase polyprotein from the 5′-end two open reading frames (two-thirds of the genome) via ribosomal frameshifting. The polymerase polyproteins in turn synthesize genomic and multiple species of subgenomic mRNAs. These mRNAs are then translated into nonstructural and structural proteins, the latter of which are essential for generation of progeny viruses.MHV can infect rodents, causing hepatitis, enteritis, nephritis, and central nervous system diseases. In the mouse central nervous system, some MHV strains, such as JHM and A59, are neurovirulent, causing acute encephalitis and chronic demyelination (1, 13), while others, such as MHV-2, exhibit extremely low neurovirulence, causing only meningitis without apparent encephalitis and demyelination (6, 16, 41). Extensive mutagenesis studies in combination with targeted RNA recombination have identified that the S protein is the major determinant of MHV pathogenicity in animals, although other viral genes also appear to modulate viral pathogenicity (17, 32). For example, the recombinant MHV Penn-98-1, which contains the S protein of MHV-2 in an A59 genome background, causes acute meningoencephalitis similar to that caused by A59 but does not cause demyelination similar to that observed for MHV-2 (6). It has also been shown that the amounts of antigen staining and necrosis in the liver correlate with the viral titer, which is determined largely by the S protein (29). However, how the S protein affects viral titer in cell culture and in animals is not known.In the present study, we initially observed that the levels of production of infectious viruses in an astrocytoma DBT cell line were markedly different among three MHV strains. Using the recombinant MHV Penn-98-1 and its isogenic S757R mutant, we further established that the S protein is responsible for the observed difference. The difference in virus production between A59 and Penn-98-1 was detected as early as 4 to 6 h postinfection (p.i.) and likely occurred during the early stages of the virus life cycle but after virus internalization. Interestingly, when the genomic RNAs were delivered directly into the cells via transfection, the levels of gene expression for these viruses were similar. Furthermore, cell fractionation experiments revealed that significantly more genomic RNAs for nonfusogenic MHVs were delivered to the ER within the first 2 h after infection than for fusogenic MHVs. These results demonstrate that the spike protein of MHV can regulate the intracellular transport of the viral genome to the ER following internalization. To our knowledge, this is the first study identifying a role for a coronavirus S protein in genome delivery in addition to its well-established role in receptor binding and virus-cell and cell-cell fusions during infection.